food system vulnerability and adaptation to global environmental change in greater faridpur region...
TRANSCRIPT
FOOD SYSTEM VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION TO GLOBAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE IN GREATER FARIDPUR REGION IN BANGLADESH
AHSAN UDDIN AHMED
Executive Director, Centre for Global Change
Site description
Greater Faridpur Region
Representative area which exhibits the general flooding characteristics of areas found in Eastern Himalayan Region.
“Too much water” during monsoon.
Frequent flooding.
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
Site descriptionPopulation: Only 4.9% of
national totalFaridpur is relatively more
urbanized, having higher population density than the rest of the Districts
Population Distribution in Greater Faridpur Region (IGP-5)
28%
19%18%
19%
16%
Faridpur Gopalgonj Shariatpur
Madaripur Rajbari
Income information: Per capita income is somewhat lower in GFR than the rest of the country. [$480/cap ppp]
General information about poverty & malnutrition Percentage of population below poverty line National Rural UrbanNational 33.7 37.4 19.1Regional Avg. 32.0 41.7 12.0No updated District-wise data available
Per capita availability of food grains (kg) 205.2Head count poverty 1805 k. cal per person per day.Incidence of poverty 42 % (Head – count ratio) cost of Basic Needs Method, 2000
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
Site description (Contd.)
Percent of population involved in agriculture: Pop (‘000) Urban Rural
All Sector 44,322 10,723 (24.19%) 33,599 (75.81%)
Agriculture 21,246 (47.94%) 2,670 (12.57%) 18,576 (87.43%)
About 6% farms are located in Greater Faridpur Region.
Migration:However, field info suggests that there are seasonal migration to Munshiganj (to help potato growers) and to urban areas for easy employment; in addition, there are migration abroad in search of employment
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
Availability
A. Long-term production potential declining/questionable
B. Increasingly becoming dependent on international importA B
Land shrinking, degrading Gap between national
Susceptibility to hazards production & demand
Industrial and agrochemical pollution increasing
Input supply – uncertain future High population
AvailabilityAccess
Utilization
Food systems: Prioritized issuesGECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7,
2009
AccessVery low affordability
High incidence of poverty
Low wage rates, high production cost
Intra-hh allocation in favour of males
Women receiving the worst, the least
Preference is largely undermined
Common hh’s diet is based on carbohydrate only!
Food systems: Prioritized issues
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
AvailabilityAccess
Utilization
Utilization
Nutritional value sacrificed
High value produce are sold to purchase rice
Food items not safe any more
Too much contaminants in processed food
Food systems: Prioritized issues
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
AvailabilityAccess
Utilization
GEC drivers/ trends (in relation to IGP-5)
Too much water during the monsoon
No control over regional flow patterns in monsoon
Drainage problem, flood
Late flood and implications for food production
Under GEC (i.e., CC) monsoon flow will increase
More frequent high floods
Occasional cyclonic storms
Riverbank erosion
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
Vulnerability to food system
Sensitive Food Security determinant
GEC-related stress to which exposed
Sensitivity to GEC stress
Coping capacity
Overall vulnerability
Production potential
Late Flood Drainage congestion
Low: opting for low-yielding variety
Moderate now, will become high
Exchange dependence
Change in production due to T & R
Low int. availability; price shock
Low: difficult for the poor to cope with
High
Very low affordability
Too much water in monsoon
Flood-related loss
Very low: lesser consumption
Very high
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
Vulnerability to food system (contd.)
Sensitive Food Security determinant
GEC-related stress to which exposed
Sensitivity to water stress
Coping capacity
Overall vulnerability
Intra-hh allocation for women
Hazard-related crop loss
High, Crop loss due to hazards
Very low: much reduced consumption
Very high
Preference is undermined
As above Very high; production loss & price hike
Very low: carbohydrates
Very high
Nutritional value sacrificed
As above High; low farm gate price, low wages
Low: high value products sold, carbohydrates
High
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
A set of adaptation (proposed by stakeholders)
Link with Food Security Outcomes & Determinants
Increased emphasis on production
Availability
(Production)
Improved flood management system
Availability (production & distribution)
Early Warning for EWE
Seasonal forecasting
Research for improved varieties suitable in marooned conditions
Availability (production)
Access (affordability, price)
Rationalization of lowest wage rate, procurement rates
Access (affordability, price, allocation)
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
A set of adaptation (proposed by stakeholders)
Link with Food Security Outcomes & Determinants
Incentives for oilseeds and lentil production (diversification), poultry and milk products
Access (affordability, price, allocation)
Utilization (nutritional value)
Implementation of food safety legal frameworks
Utilization (nutritional value)
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009
Food safety legal framework implemented
Increased emphasis on production
State
Private Sector
NGO/CSO
Resource Managers/ farmers
Improved Food Mgmt System
Early warning for EWE, forecasting
Suitable Variety Development
Wage Rate, procurement rate
Incentives of expanding food diversity
AVAILABILITY
Production
Exchange
Distribution
ACCESS
Affordability
Allocation
Preference
UTILIZATION
Nutritional Value
Social value
Food safety
FS Outcomes
Resource Managers/ farmers
State
Private Sector
NGO/CSO
Wage Rate, procurement rate
AVAILABILITY
Production
Exchange
Distribution
ACCESS
Affordability
Allocation
Preference/Diversity
UTILIZATION
Nutritional Value
Social Value
Food Safety
GECAFS IGP Briefing: Feb. 7, 2009