first quarter 2018 social weather survey: net satisfaction rating … · 2018. 5. 10. · mindanao,...

1st Quarter 2018 Social Weather Survey

SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 1 of 22

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Website: www.sws.org.ph

Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465

Fax: 920-2181

pr20180510 - Satisfaction with National Admin Overall and on Issues (media release_REV).docx

First Quarter 2018 Social Weather Survey:

Net satisfaction rating of the Duterte National Administration

declines to “Very Good” +58

Excellent in Mindanao; Very Good in Metro Manila, Balance

Luzon and Visayas

Very Good in all classes; Excellent among college graduates

Excellent on 1, Very Good on 6, Good on 11, Moderate on 1,

and Neutral on 1 subject

National Administration’s net rating improves on 2 subjects,

declines on 3, steady on 15 others

Social Weather Stations

The First Quarter 2018 Social Weather Survey, done on March 23-27, 2018, found 69% of adult

Filipinos satisfied, 18% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 11% dissatisfied with the general

performance of the current National Administration, for a net satisfaction rating of very good +58

(% satisfied minus % dissatisfied) – a 12-point decline and one grade down from the record-high excellent

+70 (79% satisfied, 9% dissatisfied) in December 2017 [Chart 1; Table 1].

Excellent in Mindanao; Very Good in Metro Manila, Balance Luzon and Visayas

The 12-point decline in the Duterte Administration’s general net satisfaction rating between

December 2017 and March 2018 was due to declines in the net satisfaction scores in Balance Luzon,

Mindanao, and Metro Manila, combined with a steady score in the Visayas.

The National Administration’s net satisfaction rating in the Visayas has been at very good +57 for

the past three quarters, from September 2017 to March 2018 [Chart 2; Table 2].

It stayed excellent in Mindanao, at +72 in March 2018, although down by 15 points from the

record-high +87 in December 2017.

It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, at +50 in March 2018, although down by 17 points from the

record-high +67 in December 2017.

http://www.sws.org.ph/


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 2 of 22

However, it fell by one grade from excellent to very good in Metro Manila, at +58 in March 2018,

down by 13 points from the record-high +71 in December.

Very Good in all classes; Excellent among college graduates

Net satisfaction with the National Administration stayed very good in classes ABC, at +56 in

March 2018, although down by 6 points from +62 in December 2017 [Chart 3; Table 3].

It also stayed very good in class E, at +54 in March 2018, although down by 12 points from +66

in December 2017.

However, it fell by one grade from excellent to very good in class D or the masa, at +58 in March

2018, down by 13 points from the record-high +71 in December 2017.

By socio-demographics, the National Administration's net satisfaction rating score stayed excellent

among college graduates, hardly moving from +74 in December 2017 to +72 in March 2018.

It stayed very good but had double-digit declines among women (from +68 to +55), and among

elementary graduates (from +68 to +56).

However, it fell by one grade from excellent to very good among men (from +73 to +60), among

the 25-34 year olds (from +72 to +62), among 35-44 year olds (from +79 to +47), among non-elementary

graduates (from +71 to +59), and among high school graduates (from +70 to +54).

The SWS terminology for net satisfaction ratings is as follows: +70 and above, “excellent”; +50

to +69, “very good”; +30 to +49, “good”; +10 to +29, “moderate”, +9 to –9, “neutral”; –10 to –29,

“poor”; –30 to –49, “bad”; –50 to –69, “very bad”; –70 and below, “execrable”. SWS considers the

movement from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade”.

Excellent on 1, Very Good on 6, Good on 11, and Moderate on 1, and Neutral on 1 subject

Out of 20 specific performance subjects rated, the Duterte Administration's net satisfaction ratings

were excellent on 1 subject, very good on 6 subjects, good on 11 subjects, moderate on 1 subject, and

neutral on 1 subject. SWS calls this its Governance Report Card [Tables 4 and 5].

The net satisfaction rating of the National Administration was excellent on Helping victims of

disasters (+75) [Chart 4].

It was very good on: Helping the poor (+68), Reconstructing Marawi City (+63), Building and

maintenance of public works (+62), Promoting the welfare of OFWs (+59), Fighting terrorism (+58), and

Protecting human rights (+54) [Charts 5 to 10].

It was good on: Eradicating graft and corruption (+46), Ensuring an efficient public

transportation system (+41), Telling the truth to the people (+41), Reconciling with Muslim rebels (+41),


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 3 of 22

Fulfilling commitments in international treaties (+40), Fighting crimes (+40), Having good relations with

the UN and other important international organizations (+37), Reconciling with communist rebels (+37),

Foreign relations (+36), Defending the country's territorial rights (+36), and Defending Philippine

sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea (+34) [Charts 11 to 18].

It was moderate on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry (+22) [Chart 19].

It was neutral on Fighting inflation (+6) [Chart 20].

National Administration’s net rating improves on 2 subjects, declines on 3, steady on 15 others

The March 2018 survey found the National Administration’s net satisfaction rating up by at least

one grade on 2 specific subjects, down by one grade on 3 specific subjects, and steady on 15 others,

compared to when they were last surveyed.

The National Administration’s net rating rose by two grades to a new record-high excellent +75

on Helping victims of disasters, up by 33 points from the good +42 in March 2017. This surpassed the

previous record of excellent +73 in August 2012.

It rose by one grade to very good +54 on Protecting human rights, up by 9 points from the good

+45 in December 2017.

It stayed very good on four specific subjects.

The new record-high very good +68 on Helping the poor was 2 points above the very good +66 in

December 2007. This surpassed the previous record of very good +67 in September 2017.

The very good +62 on Building and maintenance of public works was 3 points above the very good


The very good +59 on Promoting the welfare of OFWs was 3 points below the very good +62 in

September 2016.

The very good +58 on Fighting terrorism was 9 points below the very good +67 in December

2017.

However, it declined by one grade to very good +63 on Reconstructing Marawi City, down by 7

points from the excellent +70 in September 2017.

It stayed good on eight specific subjects.

The good +46 on Eradicating graft and corruption was 4 points above the good +42 in December

2017.

The good +41 on Ensuring an efficient public transportation system was 1 point below the good



SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 4 of 22

The good +41 on Telling the truth to the people was 6 points below the good +47 in December

2017.

The good +41 on Reconciling with Muslim rebels was 7 points below the good +48 in December

2017.

The good +40 on Fighting crimes was 3 points below the good +43 in December 2017.

The good +37 on Reconciling with communist rebels was 6 points below the good +43 in

December 2017.

The good +36 on Defending the country's territorial rights was 10 points below the good +46 in

December 2017. This is the lowest in almost two years, since the moderate +28 in April 2016.

However, it fell by one grade to good +36 on Foreign relations, down by 19 points from the very

good +55 in December 2017. This is the lowest in almost two years, since the good +36 in April 2016.

The National Administration’s net rating stayed moderate on Ensuring that no family will ever be

hungry, although down by 11 points from +33 in December 2017 to +22 in March 2018. This is similar

to the moderate +22 in March 2017.

However, it fell by one grade to neutral +6 on Fighting inflation, down by 18 points from the

moderate +24 in December 2017. This is the lowest in almost two years, since the neutral -3 in April

2016.

The subjects on Fulfilling commitments in international treaties, Having good relations with the

UN and other important international organizations, and Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West

Philippine Sea were surveyed for the first time by SWS.

Survey background

The March 2018 Social Weather Survey was conducted from March 23-27, 2018 using face-to-

face interviews of 1,200 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 each in Metro Manila, Balance

Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±3% for national percentages, and ±6% each

for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao).

The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population

projections for 2018 to obtain the national estimates.

The Social Weather Survey items on public satisfaction with the general performance of the

National Administration, and its performance on specific subjects, are non-commissioned. These items

were included on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 5 of 22

The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a

single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects. The general

rating is repeated every quarter, whereas only a core of the specific subject-ratings are repeated. Subjects

are included or excluded depending on their contemporary salience.

The survey question on public satisfaction with the overall performance of the national

administration is as follows: “Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa

kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? Kayo po ba ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO

NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, o

LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? [On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF

SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED?]”

For the specific subjects, the survey questions are as follows: “GAANO PO KAYO NASISIYAHAN

O HINDI NASISIYAHAN SA PAMAMALAKAD NG KASALUKUYANG ADMINISTRASYONG

NASYONAL TUNGKOL SA (PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES)? MASASABI BA NINYONG KAYO AY

LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI,

MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? PAKISAGOT PO ANG MGA

ITO SA PAMAMAGITAN NG PAGLALAGAY NG BAWAT KARD SA NAAANGKOP NA LUGAR SA

RATING BOARD NA ITO. (SHUFFLE CARD) [How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration’s performance in (programs or activities)? Would you say that you are VERY

SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT

DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the

appropriate box on this rating board. (SHUFFLE CARD)]”

1. PAGLALABAN SA TERORISMO (Fighting terrorism)

2. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA MGA REBELDENG MUSLIM UPANG ANG MGA ITO AY

MAGBALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with Muslim rebels)

3. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA MGA REBELDENG KOMUNISTA UPANG ANG MGA ITO AY

MAGBALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with communist rebels)

4. PAGTUTULONG SA MGA MAHIHIRAP (Helping the poor)

5. PAGLALABAN SA PAGTAAS NG PRESYO (Fighting inflation)

6. PANINIGURO NA WALANG PAMILYANG KAILANMAN AY MAGUGUTOM AT WALANG

MAKAIN (Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat)

7. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA IBANG BANSA (Foreign relations)

8. PAGKAKAROON NG MAGANDANG UGNAYAN SA UNITED NATIONS AT SA IBA PANG

MAHAHALAGANG ORGANISASYONG INTERNASYONAL (Having good relations with the

United Nations and other important international organizations)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 6 of 22

9. PAGTUTUPAD SA MGA OBLIGASYON SA MGA KASUNDUANG INTERNASYONAL

(Fulfilling commitments in international treaties)

10. PAGPUPUKSA NG KATIWALIAN AT PANGUNGURAKOT SA GOBYERNO (Eradicating

graft and corruption in government)

11. PAGTATANGGOL SA KARAPATAN NG BANSA SA TERITORYONG DAGAT NITO

(Defending the country's rights to its territorial seas)

12. PAGTATANGGOL SA KASARINLAN NG PILIPINAS SA WEST PHILIPPINE SEA (Defending

Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea)

13. PANINIGURONG MAAYOS ANG SISTEMA NG PAMPUBLIKONG TRANSPORTASYON

(Ensuring an efficient public transportation system)

14. PAGPAPAGAWA AT PAGSASAAYOS NG MGA KALSADA, TULAY AT IBA PANG

IMPRASTRUKTURA (Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges)

15. PAGSASABI NG KATOTOHANAN SA MGA TAO (Telling the truth to the people)

16. PAGTATAGUYOD NG KAPAKANAN NG MGA PILIPINONG NAGTATRABAHO SA IBANG

BANSA (Promoting the welfare of OFWs)

17. PAGTUTULONG SA MGA BIKTIMA NG KALAMIDAD (Helping victims of disasters)

18. PAGBUBUO MULI SA LUNGSOD NG MARAWI (Reconstruction of Marawi City)

19. PAGLALABAN SA MGA KRIMENG BUMIBIKTIMA SA ORDINARYONG MAMAMAYAN

TULAD NG PAGPATAY, HOLDAP, PAGNANAKAW, PANANAKIT NA PISIKAL, ATBP.

(Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical

violence, etc.)

20. PAGTATANGGOL SA KARAPATANG PANTAO (Protection of human rights)

SWS terminology for Net Satisfaction Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; +50 to +69, "very

good"; +30 to +49, "good"; +10 to +29, "moderate", +9 to –9, "neutral"; –10 to –29, "poor"; –30 to

–49, "bad"; –50 to –69, "very bad"; –70 and below, "execrable"]. A single-digit net satisfaction is

considered not significantly different from zero. SWS considers the movement from one classification to

another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade".

SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and

analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Leo S Laroza.

#


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 7 of 22

Chart 1

Table 1

First Quarter 2018 Social Weather ReportMarch 23-27, 2018 National Survey

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 – MAR 2018

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+58

VG

1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction


* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused responses. Q: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN

C. AQUINOFEB 89 +23SEP 89 +14APR 90 +17NOV 90 -10JUL 91 - 1NOV 91 + 1FEB 92 - 2APR 92 - 5

RAMOSSEP 92 +32DEC 92 +30APR 93 +24JUL 93 +31SEP 93 +14DEC 93 +24APR 94 +15AUG 94 +14NOV 94 +16DEC 94 +17MAR 95 +10JUN 95 + 6OCT 95 -18DEC 95 - 3APR 96 0JUN 96 +11

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE

OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINESRAMOS (cont.)

SEP 96 +10DEC 96 - 1APR 97 +28JUN 97 +31SEP 97 + 5DEC 97 +20FEB 98 + 8MAR 98 + 9

ESTRADASEP 98 +19NOV 98 +36MAR 99 +34JUN 99 +28OCT 99 + 2DEC 99 - 8MAR 00 + 6JUL 00 +24SEP 00 +10DEC 00 + 2

ARROYOMAR 01 +27JUL 01 +12SEP 01 + 8NOV 01 +27MAR 02 +12

ARROYO (cont.)MAY 02 0SEP 02 +15NOV 02 +13MAR 03 - 3JUN 03 +23SEP 03 - 6NOV 03 +3MAR 04 +14AUG 04 +15DEC 04 + 3MAR 05 - 6MAY 05 -13AUG 05 -11DEC 05 -15MAR 06 -15JUN 06 + 2SEP 06 - 3NOV 06 - 2FEB 07 - 3SEP 07 + 9DEC 07 -11MAR 08 -19JUN 08 -21SEP 08 -4DEC 08 -1FEB 09 -19

ARROYO (cont.)JUN 09 -11SEP 09 -20DEC 09 -22MAR 10 -45

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +64NOV 10 +64MAR 11 +46JUN 11 +45SEP 11 +56DEC 11 +56MAR 12 +46MAY 12 +44AUG 12 +62DEC 12 +57MAR 13 +53JUN 13 +66SEP 13 +56DEC 13 +51MAR 14 +45JUN 14 +29SEP 14 +35DEC 14 +34MAR 15 +19JUN 15 +31

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 15 +37DEC 15 +39APR 16 +35JUN 16 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +66DEC 16 +61MAR 17 +66JUN 17 +64SEP 17 +58DEC 17 +70MAR 18 +58


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 8 of 22

Chart 2

Table 2



NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 – MAR 2018


NCR: +58

BAL LUZ: +50VIS: +57

MIN: +72


1989 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction


C. AQUINOFEB 89 - 2 +22 +28 +37SEP 89 + 7 + 2 +25 +31APR 90 - 4 +24 +18 +15NOV 90 -42 -12 + 3 + 3JUL 91 -28 - 4 +14 + 5NOV 91 -23 0 +13 + 4FEB 92 -18 - 4 + 3 + 7APR 92 -13 - 2 - 2 - 8

RAMOSSEP 92 +35 +34 +23 +34DEC 92 +12 +34 +31 +35APR 93 + 5 +31 +18 +26JUL 93 0 +34 +28 +46SEP 93 0 +15 +16 +22DEC 93 +15 +30 +12 +29APR 94 +13 +19 + 4 +19AUG 94 + 9 +15 +10 +16NOV 94 + 4 +24 +10 +16DEC 94 + 8 +19 +19 +14MAR 95 -17 +19 - 2 +20JUN 95 - 4 +14 - 5 + 9OCT 95 -22 -22 -18 - 9DEC 95 -19 - 3 0 + 7APR 96 -15 + 2 - 9 +13

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

*Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 - 9 +17 +13 +11SEP 96 + 4 +16 +10 + 1DEC 96 + 7 + 1 -12 + 3APR 97 +31 +35 +15 +24JUN 97 +23 +34 +30 +32SEP 97 + 5 +16 -24 +11DEC 97 +19 +24 + 5 +29

ESTRADASEP 98 +19 +22 +15 +17NOV 98 +33 +41 +20 +42MAR 99 +34 +38 +18 +40JUN 99 +23 +35 +15 +30OCT 99 + 9 + 4 -10 + 7DEC 99 -14 - 9 -19 + 4MAR 00 + 2 + 8 - 4 +16JUL 00 +25 +30 - 3 +36SEP 00 + 7 +12 - 1 +20DEC 00 -14 0 -11 +31

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +25 +30JUL 01 +3 + 4 +18 +26SEP 01 - 7 + 2 +19 +19NOV 01 +7 +27 +32 +35

ARROYO (cont.)MAR 02 - 6 + 7 +29 +17MAY 02 - 3 - 5 - 2 +16SEP 02 - 3 +18 + 4 +28NOV 02 -13 + 5 +23 +34MAR 03 - 6 - 3 + 3 - 6JUN 03 +23 +22 +35 +13SEP 03 - 4 -11 + 2 - 6NOV 03 -15 -7 +19 +18MAR 04 - 6 +13 +27 +18AUG 04 - 5 + 7 +39 +22DEC 04 -11 -5 +17 +16MAR 05 -22 -20 +25 + 5MAY 05 -43 -23 -4 +17AUG 05 -25 -10 +8 -18DEC 05 -27 -11 -9 -21MAR 06 -33 - 8 - 7 -24JUN 06 -35 + 4 +19 + 6SEP 06 +29 - 3 + 5 + 3NOV 06 -10 - 2 + 5 - 1FEB 07 -20 - 6 -2 +12SEP 07 -10 + 8 +17 +16DEC 07 -24 -9 -9 -10MAR 08 -32 -20 -8 -17JUN 08 -27 -16 -26 -23SEP 08 -14 -5 -4 +4


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 1 of 2)NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 9 of 22

Chart 3


ARROYO (cont.)DEC 08 -20 -1 +12 +1FEB 09 -29 -16 -21 -18JUN 09 -19 -12 -12 -2SEP 09 -22 -21 -21 -15DEC 09 -33 -18 -23 -20MAR 10 -57 -45 -39 -44

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +68 +66 +60 +61NOV 10 +49 +69 +59 +67MAR 11 +50 +42 +51 +47JUN 11 +48 +37 +47 +57SEP 11 +44 +59 +51 +63DEC 11 +64 +52 +58 +56MAR 12 +46 +39 +49 +55MAY 12 +41 +45 +29 +58AUG 12 +56 +65 +64 +59DEC 12 +47 +54 +66 +63MAR 13 +43 +54 +45 +63JUN 13 +53 +68 +76 +63SEP 13 +45 +59 +60 +53DEC 13 +30 +52 +51 +64MAR 14 +37 +41 +45 +56JUN 14 +16 +26 +41 +34

NCR LUZ VIS MIN


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 2 of 2)

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 14 +36 +24 +45 +46DEC 14 +21 +35 +31 +43MAR 15 +21 +8 +34 +26JUN 15 +18 +29 +43 +34SEP 15 +24 +44 +34 +34DEC 15 +36 +35 +52 +36APR 16 +17 +30 +58 +33JUN 16 +32 +45 +62 +60

DUTERTESEP 16 +66 +60 +62 +81DEC 16 +53 +56 +58 +78MAR 17 +62 +60 +67 +79JUN 17 +67 +63 +56 +72SEP 17 +51 +52 +57 +74DEC 17 +71 +67 +57 +87MAR 18 +58 +50 +57 +72

NCR LUZ VIS MIN




NATIONAL ADMIN., by ECONOMIC CLASS, FEB 1989 – MAR 2018



ABC: +56D: +58

E: +54

1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 10 of 22

Table 3


C. AQUINOFEB 89 +25 +17 +38SEP 89 - 5 +14 +22APR 90 +26 +16 +15NOV 90 -47 - 7 + 1JUL 91 -27 - 2 +10NOV 91 -25 + 1 +10FEB 92 -25 0 + 2APR 92 -21 - 4 + 2

RAMOSSEP 92 +26 +42 +36DEC 92 +20 +29 +42APR 93 +17 +22 +33JUL 93 + 3 +33 +39SEP 93 + 8 +11 +31DEC 93 +23 +23 +26APR 94 + 5 +16 +17AUG 94 + 9 +13 +19NOV 94 + 8 +17 +18DEC 94 +10 +14 +28MAR 95 - 5 +11 +13JUN 95 - 8 + 8 + 9OCT 95 -14 -20 -14DEC 95 -19 - 3 + 3APR 96 -14 - 3 +17

ABC D E

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 + 4 +12 +10SEP 96 + 8 + 5 +27DEC 96 +16 - 5 + 6APR 97 +33 +27 +27JUN 97 +39 +31 +27SEP 97 + 8 + 3 +14DEC 97 +27 +20 +17FEB 98 + 2 + 7 +18MAR 98 + 3 + 9 +11SEP 98 + 6 +18 +34

ESTRADANOV 98 +27 +37 +36MAR 99 +27 +34 +38JUN 99 +20 +29 +30OCT 99 + 5 0 +10DEC 99 - 9 -10 - 2MAR 00 + 4 + 6 + 8JUL 00 +18 +24 +28SEP 00 - 5 +10 +20DEC 00 -30 + 3 +13

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +29JUL 01 +16 +11 +12

ABC D E

ARROYO (cont.)SEP 01 0 + 7 +13NOV 01 +14 +30 +16MAR 02 +17 +15 + 1MAY 02 - 4 -3 +11SEP 02 + 7 +19 + 6NOV 02 + 1 +17 + 7MAR 03 -16 0 - 7JUN 03 +40 +19 +27SEP 03 + 5 - 7 - 8NOV 03 -14 0 +16MAR 04 +6 +15 +15AUG 04 +22 +15 +14DEC 04 + 1 - 3 +19MAR 05 -21 - 5 + 2MAY 05 -15 -18 0AUG 05 - 2 -11 -15DEC 05 - 9 -17 -12MAR 06 -37 -9 -24JUN 06 - 1 + 4 - 3SEP 06 - 9 - 1 - 6NOV 06 +10 - 4 - 1FEB 07 + 4 - 2 - 6SEP 07 +20 +8 +9DEC 07 -21 -9 -13MAR 08 -18 -19 -19

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 1 of 2)



ARROYO (cont.)JUN 08 -24 -19 -25SEP 08 -14 -2 -5DEC 08 0 +2 -7FEB 09 -26 -20 -16JUN 09 -12 -12 -7SEP 09 -35 -21 -15DEC 09 -34 -22 -17MAR 10 -47 -47 -41

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +65 +66 +57NOV 10 +62 +64 +65MAR 11 +19 +46 +50JUN 11 +45 +48 +36SEP 11 +62 +57 +52DEC 11 +54 +57 +53MAR 12 +38 +44 +52MAY 12 +27 +44 +50AUG 12 +69 +62 +60DEC 12 +78 +54 +62MAR 13 +68 +50 +60JUN 13 +61 +65 +71SEP 13 +62 +56 +54DEC 13 +54 +51 +50

ABC D E

B. AQUINO (cont.)MAR 14 +32 +45 +48JUN 14 +27 +27 +38SEP 14 +47 +33 +38DEC 14 +41 +32 +40MAR 15 +19 +18 +24JUN 15 +33 +29 +38SEP 15 +21 +38 +40DEC 15 +23 +39 +44APR 16 +17 +32 +46JUN 16 +24 +51 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +58 +68 +62DEC 16 +55 +61 +62MAR 17 +61 +66 +69JUN 17 +55 +64 +68SEP 17 +60 +60 +46DEC 17 +62 +71 +66MAR 18 +56 +58 +54

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 2 of 2)



SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 11 of 22

Table 4


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: JUN 2017 TO MAR 2018 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Total PH 75% 71% 79% 69% 13% 16% 12% 18% 11% 13% 9% 11% +64 +58 +70 +58

NCR 77 70 80 72 13 11 12 13 10 19 8 14 +67 +51 +71 +58

Bal. Luzon 75 66 76 63 13 20 15 22 12 14 9 13 +63 +52 +67 +50

Visayas 70 70 71 68 16 16 13 21 14 13 15 11 +56 +57 +57 +57

Mindanao 80 81 89 81 13 13 8 11 7 6 3 8 +72 +74 +87 +72

Urban 75 73 80 72 15 14 11 18 10 13 8 10 +65 +60 +72 +63

Rural 76 69 78 66 12 18 13 18 12 13 9 13 +64 +56 +69 +53

ABC 62 71 67 69 31 18 28 16 7 11 5 13 +55 +60 +62 +56

D 75 72 79 70 13 15 12 18 11 12 8 11 +64 +60 +71 +58

E 80 62 78 65 8 21 10 21 12 16 11 11 +68 +46 +66 +54


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: JUN 2017 TO MAR 2018 (page 2 of 2)

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Jun17

Sep 17

Dec 17

Mar 18

Total PH 75% 71% 79% 69% 13% 16% 12% 18% 11% 13% 9% 11% +64 +58 +70 +58

Men 79 68 80 70 11 17 12 18 10 14 8 11 +68 +54 +73 +60

Women 72 73 77 68 16 15 13 18 12 11 9 12 +60 +62 +68 +55

18-24 74 71 73 71 15 18 18 20 11 10 9 8 +64 +61 +64 +62

25-34 74 77 81 72 13 13 9 17 12 10 9 9 +62 +68 +72 +62

35-44 76 70 84 65 13 16 11 17 11 13 5 18 +65 +56 +79 +47

45-54 74 68 78 70 13 18 12 18 12 14 11 10 +62 +53 +67 +60

55 + 77 68 76 68 13 17 15 19 10 14 9 11 +67 +54 +66 +57

Some Elem 78 62 79 70 14 23 13 17 8 14 8 11 +70 +47 +71 +59

Some HS 75 67 77 67 11 18 12 20 14 14 10 11 +61 +53 +68 +56Some Voc/Coll 73 75 79 68 17 13 12 18 11 11 9 13 +62 +64 +70 +54

Coll. Grad 83 73 80 79 7 15 13 14 10 12 6 6 +72 +60 +74 +72


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 12 of 22

Table 5


Overall performance rating 69% 18% 11% +58

Helping victims of disasters 81 11 7 +75

Helping the poor 78 11 10 +68

Rebuilding Marawi City 73 15 10 +63

Building and maintenance of public works 73 16 11 +62

Promoting the welfare of OFWs 69 19 10 +59

Fighting terrorism 73 12 15 +58

Protecting human rights 67 20 13 +54


SAT UND DIS NET

SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, MAR 2018 (page 1 of 2)

Excellent (1)

Very Good (6)

Very Good


Eradicating graft and corruption 66% 13% 20% +46

Ensuring efficient public transportation system 60 21 18 +41

Telling the truth to the people 59 22 18 +41

Reconciling with Muslim rebels 59 22 18 +41

Fulfilling commitments in international treaties 56 26 16 +40

Fighting crimes 61 33 19 +40

Having good relations with UN and other intl. orgs 55 27 17 +37

Reconciling with communist rebels 57 22 20 +37

Foreign relations 56 23 20 +36

Defending the country's territorial rights 58 20 22 +36

Defending PH sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea 57 19 23 +34

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry 51 20 29 +22

Fighting inflation 45 16 39 +6


SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, MAR 2018 (page 2 of 2)

Good (11)

Moderate (1)

SAT UND DIS NET

Neutral (1)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 13 of 22

Table 6



Mar17 Jun17 Sep17Dec17 Mar18

NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL

ADMINISTRATION ON SPECIFIC ISSUES:

PHILIPPINES, MAR 2017 – MAR 2018 (page 1 of 2)

Overall performance rating +66 +64 +58 +70 +58

Helping victims of disasters +42 (Mar15) +75

Helping the poor +63 +65 +67 +66 +68

Rebuilding Marawi City +70 +63

Building and maintenance of public works +59 +62

Promoting the welfare of OFWs +62 (Sep16) +59

Fighting terrorism +47 +49 +47 +67 +58

Protecting human rights +23 +55 +46 +45 +54

Excellent (1)

Very Good (6)

Very Good



NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL

ADMINISTRATION ON SPECIFIC ISSUES:

PHILIPPINES, MAR 2017 – MAR 2018 (page 2 of 2)

Mar17 Jun17 Sep17Dec17 Mar18

Eradicating graft and corruption +39 +43 +35 +42 +46

Ensuring efficient public transportation system +42 +41

Telling the truth to the people +47 +41

Reconciling with Muslim rebels +33 +32 +38 +48 +41

Fulfilling commitments in international treaties +40

Fighting crimes +41 +43 +30 +43 +40

Having good relations with UN and intl. orgs +37

Reconciling with communist rebels +32 +31 +35 +43 +37

Foreign relations +46 +44 +40 +55 +36

Defending the country's territorial rights +46 +51 +52 +46 +36

Defending PH sovereignty in West Philippine Sea +34

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +22 +32 +29 +33 +22

Fighting inflation +13 +24 +21 +24 +6

Good (11)

Moderate (1)

Neutral (1)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 14 of 22

Chart 4

Chart 5


RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

HELPING VICTIMS OF DISASTERS, DEC 1992 – MAR 2018

+75

E

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON HELPING THE POOR: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 – MAR 2018


VG


+68

. .1993 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 15 of 22

Chart 6

Chart 7



ON RECONSTRUCTING MARAWI CITY: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 2017 – MAR 2018


VG

DUTERTE

+63

* 2017 * 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

+90

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



ON BUILDING AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC WORKS LIKE

ROADS AND BRIDGES: PHILIPPINES, MAY 1993 – MAR 2018


+62

VG


1993 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 16 of 22

Chart 8

Chart 9


ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON PROMOTING WELFARE OF OFW’S, MAR 2000 – MAR 2018


+59

VG

2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



ON FIGHTING TERRORISM: PHILIPPINES, NOV 2002 – MAR 2018


+58

VG

ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

2002 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 17 of 22

Chart 10

Chart 11



ON PROMOTING/PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – MAR 2018



+54

VG

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

ERADICATING GRAFT AND CORRUPTION: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – MAR 2018


+46

G

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 18 of 22

Chart 12

Chart 13



ENSURING AN EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM:

PHILIPPINES, OCT 1999 – MAR 2018



+41

G

1999 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction




ON TELLING THE TRUTH TO THE PEOPLE: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – MAR 2018

+41

G


1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 19 of 22

Chart 14

Chart 15



ON RECONCILING WITH MUSLIM REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – MAR 2018



+41

G

1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



ON FIGHTING CRIMES: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 – MAR 2018



+40

G

1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 20 of 22

Chart 16

Chart 17



ON RECONCILING WITH COMMUNIST REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – MAR 2018



+37

G

1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1992 – MAR 2018


+36

G


.1992 .1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 21 of 22

Chart 18

Chart 19



ON DEFENDING THE COUNTRY’S TERRITORIAL RIGHTS:

PHILIPPINES, MAR 1999 – MAR 2018



+36

G

1999 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



ENSURING THAT NO FAMILY WILL BE HUNGRY: PHILIPPINES,

DEC 2004 – MAR 2018


ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+22

M

2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

+-10

+-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

10 May 2018, page 22 of 22

Chart 20

First Quarter 2018 Social Weather Report

March 23-27, 2018 National Survey


ON FIGHTING INFLATION: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1991 – MAR 2018



+6

N

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2016 2018

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction

first quarter 2018 social weather survey: net satisfaction rating … · 2018. 5. 10. · mindanao,...

Documents