first circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
1/118
United States Court of AppealsFor the First Circuit
No. 12- 2194
MI CHELLE KOSI LEK,
Pl ai nt i f f , Appel l ee,
v.
LUI S S. SPENCER, Commi ss i oner of t heMassachuset t s Depart ment of Corr ect i on,
Def endant , Appel l ant .
APPEAL FROM THE UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURTFOR THE DI STRI CT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[ Hon. Mar k L. Wol f , U. S. Di st r i ct J udge]
Bef or e
Tor r uel l a, Thompson, and Kayat t a,Ci r cui t J udges.
Ri char d C. McFar l and, Legal Di vi si on, Depar t ment of Cor r ect i on, wi t h whom Nancy Anker s Whi t e, Speci al Assi st antAt t or ney Gener al , was on br i ef , f or appel l ant .
Fr ances S. Cohen, wi t h whom J ef f Gol dman, Chr i st i na Chan,Bi ngham McCut chen LLP, J oseph L. Sul man, Davi d Br ody, and LawOf f i ce of J oseph L. Sul man, wer e on br i ef , f or appel l ee.
Andr ew D. Beckwi t h on br i ef f or t he Massachuset t s Fami l yI nst i t ut e, ami cus cur i ae i n suppor t of appel l ant .Cor i A. Labl e, Dani el V. McCaughey, Kr i st i n G. Al i , and Ropes
& Gr ay LLP on br i ef f or Wor l d Pr of essi onal Associ at i on f or Tr ansgender Heal t h, Ment al Heal t h Amer i ca, Cal l en- Lor de Communi t yHeal t h Cent er , Whi t man- Wal ker Heal t h, GLMA: Heal t h Pr of essi onal sAdvanci ng LGBT Equal i t y, and Mazzoni Cent er , ami ci cur i ae i nsuppor t of appel l ee.
J oshua Bl ock, Mat t hew R. Segal , and Davi d C. Fat hi on br i ef
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
2/118
f or Amer i can Ci vi l Li ber t i es Uni on, Amer i can Ci vi l Li ber t i es Uni onof Massachuset t s, Legal Ai d Soci et y, Har var d Pr i son LegalAssi st ance Pr oj ect , Pr i soner s' Legal Ser vi ces of New Yor k, andPr i soner s' Legal Ser vi ces of Massachuset t s, ami ci cur i ae i n suppor tof appel l ee.
J enni f er Levi and Bennet t H. Kl ei n on br i ef f or Gay & Lesbi an
Advocat es & Def ender s, Equal i t yMai ne, Human Ri ght s Campai gn,MassEqual i t y, Massachuset t s Tr ansgender Pol i t i cal Coal i t i on,Nat i onal Cent er f or Tr ansgender Equal i t y, Nat i onal Gay & Lesbi an Task For ce, and Tr ansgender New Hampshi r e, ami ci cur i ae i n suppor tof appel l ee.
J anuar y 17, 2014
-2-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
3/118
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Twent y year s af t er pr i son
i nmat e Mi chel l e Kosi l ek f i r st r equest ed t r eat ment f or her sever e
gender i dent i t y di sor der , t he di st r i ct cour t i ssued an or der
r equi r i ng t he def endant , Lui s S. Spencer , Commi ssi oner of t he
Massachuset t s Depart ment of Corr ect i on ( t he "DOC") , 1 t o pr ovi de
Kosi l ek wi t h sex r eassi gnment surger y. The cour t f ound t hat t he
DOC' s f ai l ur e t o pr ovi de the sur ger y —whi ch was sai d by a gr oup of
qual i f i ed doct or s t o be medi cal l y necessar y to t r eat Kosi l ek' s
condi t i on — vi ol at ed Kosi l ek' s Ei ght h Amendment r i ght s. The DOC
appeal s t he di st r i ct cour t ' s or der . Havi ng car ef ul l y consi der ed
t he r el evant l aw and t he ext ensi ve f act ual r ecor d, we af f i r m t he
j udgment of t he di st r i ct cour t .
I. BACKGROUND
A. Gender Identity Disorder and Sex Reassignment Surgery
The concept s of gender i dent i t y di sor der and sex
r eassi gnment sur ger y si t cent er st age i n t hi s case and f eat ur e
pr omi nent l y i n t hi s opi ni on. Ther ef or e, bef or e we go any f ur t her ,
we pr ovi de a l i t t l e cont ext . As t hi s cour t has expl ai ned, gender
i dent i t y di sor der i s " a psychol ogi cal condi t i on i nvol vi ng a st r ong
i dent i f i cat i on wi t h t he ot her gender . " Bat t i st a v. Cl ar ke, 645
F. 3d 449, 450 ( 1st Ci r . 2011) . I t i s a di sor der r ecogni zed by t he
Amer i can Psychi at r i c Associ at i on, whi ch descr i bes gender i dent i t y
1 For ease of r ef er ence we wi l l speak of t he def endant as t heDOC, si nce t he DOC' s commi ss i oner has changed mul t i pl e t i mes dur i ngt he l i f e span of Kosi l ek' s l awsui t s.
-3-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
4/118
di sorder as havi ng t wo component s. Amer i can Psychi at r i c Ass' n,
Di agnost i c and St at i st i cal Manual of Ment al Di sor der s, Four t h
Edi t i on - Text Revi si on 576 ( 2000) ( "DSM- I V- TR") . 2 The f i r s t i s
"evi dence of a st r ong and per si st ent cr oss- gender i dent i f i cat i on,
whi ch i s t he desi r e t o be, or t he i nsi st ence t hat one i s, of t he
ot her sex. " I d. The second i s "evi dence of per si st ent di scomf or t
about one' s assi gned sex or a sense of i nappr opr i at eness i n t he
gender r ol e of t hat sex. " I d.
Thi s cur r ent di agnosi s of gender i dent i t y di sor der grew
out of an ear l i er di agnosi s of t r anssexual i sm, whi ch f i r st appear ed
as an of f i ci al di sor der i n t he t hi r d edi t i on of t he DSM, publ i shed
i n 1980. J udi t h S. St er n & Cl ai r e V. Mer ki ne, Br i an L. v. Admi n.
f or Chi l dr en' s Ser vi ces: Ambi val ence Towar d Gender I dent i t y
Di sor der as a Medi cal Condi t i on, 30 Women' s Rt s. L. Rep. 566, 567-
68 ( 2009) . I n t he 1950s and 1960s, r esear ch began t o show t hat a
"combi nat i on of psychot herapy, hormone t r eat ment , and surgi cal
r econf i gur at i on of t he geni t al i a" coul d be used t o t r eat gender
i dent i t y di sor der . I d. at 571. Thi s i dea gai ned t r act i on i n t he
1960s and 1970s, i d. , and as we wi l l di scuss mor e f ul l y bel ow, t hi s
2 DSM- I V- TR, t he ver si on appl i cabl e i n Kosi l ek' s cases, usest he t er m gender i dent i t y di sor der . A newer edi t i on, DSM- 5, was
r el eased i n May 2013. DSM- 5 r epl aces t he t er m gender i dent i t ydi sorder wi t h gender dysphor i a t o avoi d any negat i ve st i gma. SeeAmer i can P s ychi at r i c As s ' n, Gender Dy s phor i a,ht t p: / / www. dsm5. org/ Document s/ Gender %20Dysphor i a%20Fact %20Sheet . pdf ( l ast vi si t ed J an. 16, 2014) . Because t he t er m gender i dent i t ydi sor der was used t hr oughout Kosi l ek' s cases and was t he then-appr opr i ate nomencl at ur e, we wi l l use t hat t er m.
-4-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
5/118
t r i adi c appr oach i s st i l l ut i l i zed by many pr act i t i oner s t oday.
Sex r eassi gnment surger y i n par t i cul ar has been per f ormed i n Nor t h
Amer i ca si nce at l east t he 1950s, and i t has been est i mat ed t hat as
of J anuary 2006, 30, 000 sex r eass i gnment surger i es have been
per f or med i n t he Uni t ed St at es. I d. at 571- 72.
Wi t h t hi s bi gger pi ct ur e i n pl ace, we move on t o t he
f act s of t hi s case. We agai n not e t hat t hi s case has an over
t went y- year hi st or y. Thi s has i ncl uded t wo t r i al s and t wo l engt hy,
f act- i nt ensi ve deci si ons i ssued by t he di st r i ct cour t , t he l at t er
of whi ch i s t he subj ect mat t er of t hi s appeal . Because of t hi s,
and because t he di st r i ct cour t ' s opi ni on was so f act - i nt ensi ve, i t
i s necessar y f or us t o l ay out a good deal of backgr ound.
B. Kosilek's Conviction
Mi chel l e Kosi l ek, née Rober t , who i s si xt y- f our year s
ol d, was bor n and st i l l i s anat omi cal l y mal e. Kosi l ek suf f er s f r om
gender i dent i t y di sor der . Thi s has r esul t ed i n Kosi l ek' s l ong- hel d
bel i ef t hat she3 i s a woman cr uel l y t r apped i n a man' s body.
Kosi l ek, who spent some of her chi l dhood i n an or phanage,
suf f er ed r egul ar abuse as a chi l d, i n par t because of her expr essed
desi r e t o l i ve as a gi r l . As she gr ew ol der , she al t er nat ed
between l i vi ng as a man and a woman. Kosi l ek' s t eenage and ear l y
3 We wi l l r ef er t o Kosi l ek as her pr ef er r ed gender of f emal e,usi ng f emi ni ne pr onouns.
-5-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
6/118
adul t year s wer e mar r ed by ar r est s, i ncar cer at i ons, beat i ngs, heavy
dr i nki ng, dr ug use, and a st i nt as a pr ost i t ut e.
Somet i me i n t he 1980s, Kosi l ek marr i ed Cheryl McCaul , a
vol unt eer counsel or at a dr ug r ehabi l i t at i on f aci l i t y, who Kosi l ek
met whi l e bei ng t r eat ed t here. McCaul t hought she coul d cur e
Kosi l ek' s gender i dent i t y di sor der , but Kosi l ek' s desi r e t o be
f emal e di d not go away. I n 1990, Kosi l ek mur dered McCaul . Kosi l ek
f l ed t he ar ea but was ul t i matel y appr ehended i n New Yor k.
Kosi l ek awai t ed t r i al at t he Br i st ol Count y J ai l . Whi l e
t here, Kosi l ek, who had t aken f emal e hormones many years ear l i er ,
st ar t ed t aki ng f emal e hor mones ( i n t he f or mof bi r t h cont r ol pi l l s)
t hat she i l l i ci t l y obt ai ned f r om a guar d. She al so, at her own
expense, consul t ed wi t h a gender i dent i t y di sor der speci al i st ,
t hough she was not al l owed t o undergo any t r eat ment . Whi l e
awai t i ng t r i al , Kosi l ek t wi ce t r i ed t o ki l l her sel f ; one at t empt
was made whi l e she was t aki ng t he ant i depr essant Prozac. Kosi l ek
al so at t empt ed sel f - cast r at i on.
Kosi l ek was event ual l y t r i ed and, i n 1992, was convi ct ed
of McCaul ' s mur der and sent enced t o l i f e i n pr i son wi t hout t he
possi bi l i t y of par ol e. She was t ur ned over t o t he DOC and si nce
1994 has been r esi di ng i n t he gener al popul at i on at MCI - Nor f ol k, a
medi umsecur i t y mal e pr i son. Ther e Kosi l ek st ar t ed l i vi ng, t o t he
ext ent possi bl e, as a woman, l egal l y changi ng her name f r omRobert
t o Mi chel l e.
-6-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
7/118
C. Kosilek's Lawsuits
I n 1992, Kosi l ek f i l ed a pr o se compl ai nt agai nst t he DOC
i n t he Uni t ed St at es Di st r i ct Cour t f or t he Di st r i ct of
Massachuset t s. 4 See Kosi l ek v. Mal oney, 221 F. Supp. 2d 156 ( D.
Mass. 2002) ( "Kosi l ek I " ) . Kosi l ek al l eged t he DOC was denyi ng her
adequate medi cal care i n vi ol at i on of t he Ei ght h Amendment .
Kosi l ek sought damages and an i nj unct i on order i ng t hat she be
pr ovi ded wi t h sex r eass i gnment surgery. The case was assi gned t o
J udge Mar k L. Wol f , and proceeded f or some years wi t h t he par t i es
engagi ng i n di scover y and mot i on pr act i ce.
Meanwhi l e, i n December 2000, havi ng not yet r ecei ved t he
r el i ef she was seeki ng, Kosi l ek f i l ed t hi s case — a second pr o se
l awsui t agai nst t he DOC and some of i t s medi cal pr ovi der s. See
Kosi l ek v. Spencer , 889 F. Supp. 2d 190 ( D. Mass. 2012) ( "Kosi l ek
I I " ) . Agai n t he gr avamen of Kosi l ek' s compl ai nt was that t he DOC
was denyi ng her adequat e medi cal car e i n vi ol at i on of t he Ei ght h
Amendment by not pr ovi di ng her wi t h sex r eass i gnment sur gery. Thi s
case al so went t o J udge Wol f .
I n Febr uar y 2002, Kosi l ek' s f i r st l awsui t , Kosi l ek I ,
f i nal l y pr oceeded t o a non- j ur y t r i al . Due t o some pr et r i al
ski r mi shi ng, onl y Kosi l ek' s cl ai m f or i nj uncti ve r el i ef r emai ned
( her damages cl ai m was gone) . The t r i al l ast ed a coupl e of weeks.
4 Kosi l ek i ni t i al l y sued t he Br i st ol Count y Sher i f f , but l at eramended t he compl ai nt t o i ncl ude t he DOC af t er she was t r ansf err edt o i t s cust ody.
-7-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
8/118
D. The Kosilek I Decision
On August 28, 2002, J udge Wol f i ssued hi s deci si on. See
Kosi l ek I , 221 F. Supp. 2d at 156. The cour t expl ai ned t hat t o
make out an Ei ght h Amendment vi ol at i on, both an obj ect i ve and a
subj ect i ve component must be sat i sf i ed. I n shor t , t he obj ect i ve
component r equi r es t hat t he i nmate has a ser i ous medi cal need that
has not been adequat el y t r eat ed. The subj ect i ve pi ece, on t he
ot her hand, f ocuses on t he st at e of mi nd of t he pr i son of f i ci al s
and r equi r es t hat t hey were aware t he i nmate was at r i sk f or
ser i ous har m. 5
The cour t f ound t hat Kosi l ek suf f er ed f r oma severe f or m
of gender i dent i t y di sorder t hat caused her gr eat ment al angui sh.
I t went on t o hol d t hat t hi s di sorder was a ser i ous medi cal need
wi t hi n t he meani ng of t he Ei ght h Amendment . To addr ess t he i ssue
of what t ypes of t r eat ment mi ght be war r ant ed, t he cour t l ooked t o
t he Har r y Benj ami n St andar ds of Car e ( t he "Standar ds of Car e") , 6
whi ch i t f ound t o be t he accept ed pr ot ocol s used by pr of essi onal s
5 We wi l l go i nt o much gr eat er dept h regar di ng the Ei ght hAmendment st andar d i n our own anal ysi s, but f or now i t suf f i ces t oi nt r oduce t he concept of t he t wo- pr onged t est .
6 The oper at i ve ver si on of t he St andar ds of Car e f or bot hKosi l ek I and Kosi l ek I I i s t he Si xt h Ver si on, i ssued i n Febr uar y
2001. See Har r y Benj ami n I nt ' l Gender Dysphor i a Ass' n, St andar dsof Car e f or Gender I dent i t y Di sor der s, Si xt h Ver si on ( 2001) . TheSeventh Ver si on came out i n 2011 under a new name. Wor l dPr of essi onal Associ at i on f or Tr ansgender Heal t h, St andar ds of Car ef or t he Heal t h of Transsexual , Transgender , and Gender -Nonconf ormi ng Peopl e, Versi on 7 ( 2011) ( t he "St andards of Care,Ver si on 7" ) .
-8-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
9/118
i n t he Uni t ed St at es t o t r eat gender i dent i t y di sor der . The
St andar ds of Car e i ndi cat ed t hat , dependi ng on t he sever i t y of an
i ndi vi dual ' s gender i dent i t y di sor der , psychot her apy al one or
psychot herapy al ong wi t h t he admi ni st r at i on of f emal e hormones
coul d const i t ut e suf f i ci ent t r eat ment . I n ot her i nst ances,
however , sex r eass i gnment surgery was medi cal l y necessary. The
cour t f ound t hat , despi t e DOC doctors r ecommendi ng t hat Kosi l ek
r ecei ve f emal e hormones and possi bl y surgery, t he DOC, whi ch at t he
t i me was headed up by Commi ssi oner Mi chael Mal oney, had not
pr ovi ded Kosi l ek wi t h any of t he t r eat ment pr escr i bed by t he
St andards of Care.
The cour t chr oni cl ed t he st eps t aken by Mal oney t o avoi d
pr ovi di ng Kosi l ek wi t h t r eat ment . Fi r st , when an exper t hi r ed by
t he DOC, Marshal l For st ei n, M. D. , r ecommended psychotherapy and
hor mones f or Kosi l ek, and al so, t hat she be al l owed t o consul t wi t h
a sur geon who speci al i zed i n sex reass i gnment surgery, t he DOC
t er mi nat ed i t s r el at i onshi p wi t h Dr . For st ei n. Mal oney t hen made
i t cl ear t o DOC doct or s t hat he di d not want t o pr ovi de Kosi l ek or
any t r ansgender pr i soner wi t h hormones or sur ger y, and t he DOC
pr oceeded t o f i nd a Canadi an doct or , Rober t Di ckey, M. D. , who
bel i eved i nmates shoul d never be consi dered f or sex reass i gnment
surger y. Dr . Di ckey advocat ed a " f r eeze- f r ame" pol i cy wher eby
t r ansgender i ndi vi dual s woul d be f r ozen i n t he f r ame i n whi ch t hey
ent er ed pr i son. For i nst ance, onl y per sons recei vi ng hor mones
-9-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
10/118
bef or e t hey wer e i n pr i son woul d get hor mones i n pr i son. Despi t e
Mal oney havi ng l i t t l e f ami l i ar i t y wi t h t he r at i onal e behi nd Dr .
Di ckey' s phi l osophy on t he t r eat ment of gender i dent i t y di sorder ,
and not havi ng read the St andards of Care, Mal oney adopt ed Dr .
Di ckey' s f r eeze- f r ame pol i cy f or t he DOC.
Dr . Di ckey t est i f i ed at t r i al , but t he cour t di d not f i nd
hi m per suasi ve because he di d not subscr i be t o t he St andar ds of
Car e, whi ch t he cour t f ound t hat pr udent pr of essi onal s f ol l ow, and
hi s appr oach di d not al l ow f or i ndi vi dual assessment . The cour t
f ound Kosi l ek' s exper t s credi bl e and r el i ed on t hei r t est i mony t o
f i nd that t he obj ect i ve component of t he Ei ght h Amendment had been
sat i sf i ed, namel y that Kosi l ek had a ser i ous medi cal need t hat had
not been adequatel y t r eat ed.
But t he cour t f ound Kosi l ek had f al l en shor t of
est abl i shi ng an Ei ght h Amendment vi ol at i on because t he subj ect i ve
component of del i ber at e i ndi f f er ence had not been sat i sf i ed.
Mal oney, t he cour t concl uded, knew many f act s f r om whi ch he coul d
have i nf er r ed Kosi l ek woul d suf f er ser i ous har m i f her gender
i dent i t y di sor der was not t r eat ed, but he di d not act ual l y dr aw
t hat r equi r ed i nf er ence. I nst ead J udge Wol f f ound Mal oney' s
r ef usal t o al l ow Kosi l ek t r eat ment was " r oot ed i n si ncer e secur i t y
concer ns, and i n a f ear of publ i c and pol i t i cal cri t i ci smas wel l . "
The end r esul t : because t her e was no Ei ght h Amendment vi ol at i on,
t he cour t di d not or der t he DOC t o do anythi ng.
-10-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
11/118
Nonethel ess, J udge Wol f expected i t woul d do somethi ng.
He wr ot e: "Thi s cour t ' s deci si on put s Mal oney on not i ce that
Kosi l ek has a ser i ous medi cal need whi ch i s not bei ng pr oper l y
t r eat ed. Ther ef or e, he has a dut y t o r espond r easonabl y t o i t .
The cour t expect s t hat he wi l l . "
E. The After-Effects of Kosilek I
Fol l owi ng t he cour t ' s di ct at e, l ot s of act i vi t y ensued at
t he DOC. Fi r st , t he DOC l i f t ed i t s f r eeze- f r ame pol i cy ar ound
December 2002. I n i t s pl ace went a pol i cy al l owi ng i nmat es
suf f er i ng f r om gender i dent i t y di sor der t o r ecei ve a l evel of
t r eat ment commensur ate wi t h that whi ch t hey were recei vi ng upon
ent er i ng pr i son ( i ncl udi ng r ecei pt of hor mones) , but al so pr ovi di ng
f or i ncr eased or decr eased t r eat ment i f i t was det ermi ned t o be
medi cal l y i ndi cat ed by t he Uni ver si t y of Massachuset t s Cor r ect i onal
Heal t h Pr ogr am( "UMass" ) , t he ent i t y under cont r act wi t h t he DOC t o
pr ovi de medi cal ( i ncl udi ng ment al heal t h) ser vi ces t o al l i nmat es.
Pr i or t o t he i mpl ement at i on of any pr ogr essi ve or r egr essi ve
t r eat ment changes, t he DOC' s Di r ect or of Heal t h Ser vi ces and t he
Commi ss i oner were requi r ed t o consi der whether t he changes woul d
r esul t i n any saf et y or secur i t y concer ns.
A coupl e of mont hs l ater , i n Febr uary 2003, t he DOC
br ought i n a gender i dent i t y speci al i st , Davi d Sei l , M. D. , t o
-11-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
12/118
eval uat e Kosi l ek. 7 Dr . Sei l i nt er vi ewed Kosi l ek and r evi ewed her
medi cal r ecor ds, and t hen conveyed hi s f i ndi ngs and r ecommendat i on
i n wr i t i ng. Per DOC pol i cy, whi ch r equi r ed any r ecommendat i ons
i nvol vi ng gender i dent i t y di sorder t o go to bot h UMass' s Medi cal
Di r ect or and i t s Ment al Heal t h Pr ogr amDi r ect or , t he r epor t went t o
Kennet h Appel baum, M. D. , who hel d t he l at t er posi t i on.
Dr . Sei l wr ot e t he f ol l owi ng. Li ke Dr s. For st ei n and
Di ckey bef or e hi m, he di agnosed Kosi l ek wi t h gender i dent i t y
di sorder . He f ound Kosi l ek' s "gender dysphor i a8 i nt ense, " and
t hough Kosi l ek had done what she coul d t o obt ai n r el i ef by l i vi ng
as a woman, her basi c di sor der had been l ef t unt r eat ed dur i ng her
i ncar cer at i on. Dr . Sei l , who not ed t hat Kosi l ek had been l i vi ng as
a woman i n a mal e pr i son wi t hout secur i t y i ssues t hus f ar ,
i ndi cat ed t hat t he St andar ds of Car e "need[ ed] t o be observed. " He
f ur t her f ound t hat Kosi l ek was not cur r ent l y sui ci dal because she
t hen f el t some power over her pur sui t of becomi ng a woman.
7 UMass' s pol i cy was t o ut i l i ze consul t ant s i n mat t er s t hatwent beyond t he exper t i se of i t s di r ect st af f .
8 Dr . Sei l , and var i ous ot her medi cal pr ovi der s i nvol ved i nt hi s case, somet i mes use t he t er m gender dysphor i a. As i ndi cat edpr evi ousl y, t he Amer i can Psychi at r i c Associ at i on now uses t hi s t er mi n pl ace of gender i dent i t y di sor der . The cur r ent ver si on of t he
St andar ds of Car e says gender dysphor i a i s " br oadl y def i ned asdi scomf or t or di st r ess t hat i s caused by a di scr epancy bet ween aper son' s gender i dent i t y and t hat per son' s sex assi gned at bi r t h. "St andar ds of Car e, Ver si on 7, at 2. I t i s not cer t ai n whet her t hemedi cal pr ovi der s i n t hi s case wer e al l usi ng t he t er m genderdysphor i a t o mean pr eci sel y t he same thi ng but , at a mi ni mum, i tappear s t hey wer e al l usi ng i t si mi l ar l y.
-12-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
13/118
Dr . Sei l made sever al r ecommendat i ons. Fi r st , Kosi l ek
shoul d be pr ovi ded wi t h est r ogen t her apy, el ect r ol ysi s
( speci f i cal l y, per manent f aci al hai r r emoval ) , and access t o
gender - appr opr i at e per sonal i t ems, such as f emal e cl ot hi ng and
make- up. Addi t i onal l y, Kosi l ek shoul d be al l owed t o see t he
t her api st she had been t r eat i ng wi t h, mast er ' s- l evel psychol ogi st
Mark Bur r owes, more of t en t han once a mont h. Fur t her , f emi ni zi ng
pr ocedur es, such as r hi nopl ast y (pl ast i c sur ger y per f or med on t he
nose) or br east augment at i on, shoul d be consi der ed i n t he f ut ur e.
Fi nal l y, Dr . Sei l not ed t hat sex reassi gnment sur ger y was t he l ast
st ep i n t r eat i ng gender i dent i t y di sor der . He expl ai ned t hat , as
pr ovi ded i n t he St andar ds of Car e, an eval uat i on of t he necessi t y
of t he surger y must wai t unt i l af t er a pat i ent has l i ved as a woman
f or at l east a year . 9 Whi l e Kosi l ek had been l i vi ng as a woman f or
many years, she had not had t he benef i t of hor mone ther apy and
el ect r ol ysi s. Ther ef or e Dr . Sei l r ecommended t hat af t er Kosi l ek
had a year of hor mone t r eat ment under her bel t , an exper i enced
gender i dent i t y speci al i st shoul d eval uat e her t o det er mi ne whet her
surger y was needed.
9 Dr . Sei l was r ef er r i ng t o t he f act t hat t he St andar ds of Car e requi r e t hat pr i or t o recei vi ng sex reassi gnment sur ger y, aper son must l i ve f ul l - t i me f or one year i n t he pr ef er r ed genderr ol e. Thi s r equi r ement i s commonl y cal l ed t he r eal - l i f eexper i ence, and i t i s somet hi ng we wi l l di scuss i n mor e det ai ll at er .
-13-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
14/118
The DOC began i mpl ement i ng Dr . Sei l ' s r ecommendat i ons.
I n Apr i l 2003, Kosi l ek st ar t ed t r eat i ng wi t h an endocr i nol ogi st t o
devel op a hormone t herapy t r eat ment pl an. Concomi t ant l y, per DOC
pol i cy, t he secur i t y i mpl i cat i ons of Kosi l ek r ecei vi ng hor mones
were assessed. On J ul y 29, 2003, Lui s Spencer , now t he DOC
Commi ssi oner but t hen t he Super i nt endent of MCI - Nor f ol k, r epor t ed
t o t hen DOC Commi ss i oner Mal oney that he di d not bel i eve t here were
any cur r ent secur i t y concer ns wi t h Kosi l ek bei ng pr ovi ded est r ogen
t her apy, but once Kosi l ek began t o exhi bi t physi cal changes
secur i t y concer ns mi ght have t o be reeval uat ed.
And so on August 26, 2003, Kosi l ek began f emal e hormone
t r eat ment . Then, st ar t i ng i n Oct ober 2003, Kosi l ek was pr ovi ded
wi t h cer t ai n gender - appr opr i at e i t ems, such as f emal e under gar ment s
and make- up. As nei t her Dr . Sei l nor t he endocr i nol ogi st Kosi l ek
was t r eat i ng wi t h had made speci f i c r ecommendat i ons as t o whether
f emi ni zi ng pr ocedur es were needed, none were pr ovi ded. The DOC di d
f i nd a f aci l i t y wi l l i ng t o pr ovi de Kosi l ek wi t h el ectr ol ysi s and,
af t er a secur i t y revi ew of t he f aci l i t y was conducted, el ect r ol ysi s
t r eat ment s were schedul ed f or November t he f ol l owi ng year .
I n December 2003, Kat hl een Dennehy, who had been t he
DOC' s Deputy Commi ssi oner under Mal oney, was el evat ed t o
Commi ss i oner . Ri ght away she i nf ormed t he st af f she want ed t o
-14-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
15/118
"r egr oup on t hi s GI D st uf f . "10 And she want ed Kosi l ek r eeval uated
bef or e appr ovi ng " l aser hai r r emoval or anythi ng el se. "11
As of September 2004, Kosi l ek had been on hor mones f or a
year and, pur suant t o the St andar ds of Car e and Dr . Sei l ' s
r ecommendat i on, was el i gi bl e to be eval uated f or sex reass i gnment
sur ger y. The i ssue of conduct i ng eval uat i ons f or pr i soner s wi t h
gender i dent i t y di sorder was t aken up at execut i ve st af f meet i ngs,
at t ended by UMass and DOC personnel , around t hi s t i me. Those
t ypi cal l y i n at t endance f r om t he DOC i ncl uded Susan Mar t i n, t he
DOC' s Di r ect or of Heal t h Servi ces, and Gr egory Hughes, t he DOC' s
Di r ect or of Ment al Heal t h and Subst ance Abuse Ser vi ces, as wel l as
a coupl e ot her DOC of f i ci al s. Repr esent i ng UMass was i t s Ment al
Heal t h Progr am Di r ect or Dr . Appel baum, al ong wi t h some addi t i onal
UMass per sonnel .
At one meet i ng, Dr . Appel baum spoke about r et ai ni ng the
Fenway Communi t y Heal t h Cent er ( t he "Fenway Cent er " ) , a Bost on
heal t hcar e f aci l i t y f ocused on ser vi ng t he l esbi an, gay, bi sexual ,
and t r ansgender communi t y. Hughes, however , had some r eser vat i ons;
he f el t t he Fenway Cent er mi ght be t oo sympathet i c t o t he pr i soners
and t oo qui ck t o r ecommend t r eat ment . Dr . Appel baum count ered,
st at i ng t he Fenway Cent er ' s appr oach r epr esent ed t he nor m r at her
10 "GI D" i s an acronym f or gender i dent i t y di sor der .
11 I t i s uncl ear f r om t he r ecor d what happened, i f anyt hi ng,based on Dennehy' s desi r es t o r egr oup and reeval uate.
-15-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
16/118
t han t he except i on and t here real l y were not many ot her pr ovi ders
i n t he area wi t h whomt o consul t . Hughes sai d he had spoken wi t h
a J ohns Hopki ns gender i dent i t y speci al i st , Cynt hi a Osbor ne, a
l i censed soci al wor ker , who was wor ki ng wi t h t he Vi r gi ni a and
Wi sconsi n depart ment s of cor r ect i ons, whi ch had al so been sued by
t r ansgender pr i soner s. I t was not ed on t he meet i ng mi nut es t hat
Osborne "may do more obj ect i ve eval uat i ons, " and was "[ m] ore
sympat het i c t o DOC posi t i on. "
Despi t e Hughes' s qual ms about t he Fenway Cent er and the
possi bl e opt i on of usi ng Osbor ne, t he DOC went ahead wi t h ret ai ni ng
t he Fenway Cent er . Kosi l ek was eval uat ed by Kevi n Kapi l a, M. D. ,
and Randi Kauf man, Psy. D. , who conduct ed a ni nety- mi nut e i nt ervi ew
wi t h her and r evi ewed her medi cal r ecor ds. The doct or s i ssued
t hei r r epor t wi t h sever al f i ndi ngs on Febr uar y 24, 2005 ( t he
"Fenway Report " ) . As had been document ed i n t he past , Kosi l ek
"cl ear l y f i t [ ] " t he di agnosi s f or gender i dent i t y di sor der .
Kosi l ek had been on hormone t herapy and l i vi ng f ul l - t i me as a woman
f or sevent een mont hs by t hat t i me. Kosi l ek' s abi l i t y t o l i ve as a
woman, her good behavi or , and her absence of conf l i ct wi t h others,
suggest ed, accor di ng t o t he doct or s, an " i nt ense mot i vat i on, as
wel l as a r eal adapt abi l i t y t o her envi r onment . " They not ed her
f avor abl e response t o t he use of hor mones, el ect r ol ysi s, and use of
f emi ni ne pr oduct s. But , t hey not ed, Kosi l ek was st i l l "qui t e
di st r essed, " and gi ven Kosi l ek' s "previ ous sui ci de at t empt s, her
-16-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
17/118
ongoi ng di st r ess, and l ack of ot her goal s i n her l i f e, " t he doct or s
f ound i t was qui t e l i kel y Kosi l ek woul d at t empt sui ci de agai n i f
she was not provi ded wi t h sex r eass i gnment surgery. Kosi l ek had a
ser i ous medi cal need, t hey f el t , and t her e was a subst ant i al r i sk
of har m i f her di sor der was l ef t unt r eat ed.
The r epor t went on t o not e t hat Kosi l ek had moved
successf ul l y t hr ough t he st eps out l i ned i n t he St andar ds of Car e,
t her e had not been any adver se react i ons t o Kosi l ek' s f emi ni zed
appear ance, and Kosi l ek had benef i t t ed psychol ogi cal l y f r om her
changes. Dr s. Kapi l a and Kauf man concl uded Kosi l ek was l i kel y
r eady f or sex r eassi gnment sur ger y. The surger y, t he doct or s
opi ned, woul d pr ovi de Kosi l ek wi t h f ul l r el i ef f r omt he sympt oms of
gender i dent i t y di sorder and l i kel y i ncr ease her chance of
sur vi val . The ul t i mat e r ecommendat i on of t he speci al i st s r et ai ned
by the DOC as advi sed by i t s own doctors: Kosi l ek shoul d be gi ven
t he surgery.
Unhappy wi t h t he Fenway Repor t , t he DOC t urned t o t he
J ohns Hopki ns gender i dent i t y speci al i st , Cynthi a Osbor ne, whose
name had been bat t ed ar ound at t he ear l i er DOC meet i ng. The DOC
asked Osborne t o conduct a peer r evi ew12 of t he Fenway Repor t and
12 Peer r evi ew i s t he t ermused by t he DOC —we pr esume becausesoci al wor ker Osbor ne was t asked pr i mar i l y wi t h r evi ewi ng t her ecommendat i on of her so- cal l ed peer s, t he Fenway Cent er doctors,as opposed t o i nt ervi ewi ng Kosi l ek and conduct i ng an i ndependentassessment .
-17-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
18/118
she agr eed. The r epor t , al ong wi t h ot her eval uat i ons conduct ed of
Kosi l ek, wer e sent t o Osbor ne on Apr i l 12, 2005.
I n t he meant i me, on Apr i l 15, 2005, Dr . Appel baum, who at
t he t i me was a def endant i n t hi s l awsui t al ong wi t h UMass and some
ot her doctor s, f i l ed ( at t he di st r i ct cour t ' s r equest ) a st at us
r epor t . I t advi sed t he cour t of Dr s. Kapi l a and Kauf man' s sex
r eass i gnment sur gery r ecommendat i on f or Kosi l ek. Dr . Appel baum
al so sai d he had advi sed the DOC of t he doct ors' r ecommendat i on and
had i nf ormed t hem he was unawar e of any medi cal r eason why Kosi l ek
shoul d not r ecei ve t he sur ger y.
The cour t r esponded wi t h an Apr i l 25, 2005 or der
di r ect i ng t he DOC t o pr ovi de a r epor t addr essi ng pot ent i al secur i t y
concer ns shoul d Kosi l ek under go t he sur ger y. I t al so di r ect ed t he
DOC t o i ndi cat e whet her i t was goi ng t o pr ovi de Kosi l ek wi t h t he
surger y r ecommended by t he Fenway Cent er doct or s.
A f ew days l ater , on Apr i l 28, 2005, t he DOC r esponded t o
t he UMass st atus r eport . The l et t er was penned by Susan Mart i n
( r ecal l she was t he DOC Di r ect or of Heal t h Ser vi ces) and sent t o
Dr . Appel baum and UMass' s Medi cal Di r ect or , Ar t hur Br ewer , M. D.
( al so a def endant ) . Dennehy and ot her DOC of f i ci al s wer e copi ed.
Mar t i n mal i gned Dr . Appel baum' s st at us r epor t , asser t i ng t hat t he
DOC di d not consi der i t an adequate revi ew of t he Fenway Repor t or
a cl ear expl anat i on of UMass' s r ecommendat i on. Mart i n r equest ed
t hat t he UMass doct ors make cl ear whether t hey t hought Kosi l ek
-18-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
19/118
shoul d be operated on. She al so want ed answers t o var i ous
quest i ons r el at i ng t o, among ot her t hi ngs, t he sur ger y' s l ogi st i cs,
such as who woul d per f or mi t , t he r ecover y pr ocess, and t he success
rat e.
Dr s. Appel baum and Br ewer , i n a May 10, 2005 r esponse
l et t er t o t he DOC, cl ar i f i ed t hei r st ance on t he Fenway Repor t . As
t hey expl ai ned, UMass def er r ed t o t he Fenway Cent er and st ood
behi nd t he doctors' sex r eass i gnment surgery r ecommendat i on f or
Kosi l ek. They wer e awar e of no ment al heal t h bar r i er s t o Kosi l ek
bei ng operated on and t he next st ep was f i ndi ng a surgeon. I t
appear ed t here were no physi ci ans i n Massachuset t s who coul d
per f or m t he sur ger y, so some out - of - st at e pr act i t i oner s wer e
suggest ed. The doct or s al so of f er ed t o l ook i nt o t he l ogi st i cs of
pr ovi di ng t he sur ger y.
I n t he i nt er i m, Osbor ne compl et ed her r evi ew of t he
Fenway Report . 13 She chr oni cl ed her f i ndi ngs i n a r epor t dat ed May
20, 2005, whi ch she sent t o t he DOC. I t began wi t h t he caveat t hat
Osbor ne had not conduct ed a cl i ni cal eval uat i on of Kosi l ek and her
r epor t was based sol el y on her r evi ew of t he Fenway Repor t and some
of t he ot her eval uat i ons of Kosi l ek. Though she di d not doubt
13 We pause t o say a l i t t l e more about Osbor ne' squal i f i cat i ons. Accor di ng t o her C. V. , at l east as of 2006, shehel d a mast er ' s degr ee i n educat i on and soci al work. Osbor ne wasal so an assi st ant pr of essor of psychi at r y at J ohns Hopki nsUni ver si t y School of Medi ci ne and on t he consul t i ng f acul t y of t heUni ver si t y' s Cent er f or Sexual Heal t h and Medi ci ne.
-19-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
20/118
Kosi l ek met t he cr i t er i a f or gender i dent i t y di sor der , Osbor ne went
on t o l odge numer ous cr i t i ci sms agai nst Dr s. Kapi l a and Kauf man' s
approach.
Fi r st , Osbor ne di spar aged the Fenway Repor t f or not
addr essi ng t he i ssue of whet her Kosi l ek was suf f er i ng f r om any
per sonal i t y di sor der s. She opi ned t hat " [ c] l ar i t y r egar di ng t he
pr esence, absence, nat ur e and sever i t y" of any per sonal i t y
di sor der , especi al l y gi ven t hat cl i ni ci ans had at one poi nt
di agnosed Kosi l ek wi t h ant i soci al per sonal i t y di sor der , was
cr i t i cal because i t s pr esence coul d compl i cat e a gender i dent i t y
di sor der di agnosi s. Osbor ne al so ar gued t hat t hr eat s of sui ci de
and sel f - har m si gnal ser i ous ment al i l l ness apar t f r om gender
i dent i t y di sorder , whi ch demands t r eat ment and, i n f act , counsel s
agai nst pr ovi di ng sex r eass i gnment surgery. She t hought t he Fenway
Repor t had gi ven shor t shr i f t t o t hi s i ssue.
Osbor ne then t ur ned her f ocus t o t he St andards of Care,
expr essi ng her concer ns t hat t hey di d not t r ansl at e wel l i nt o a
pr i son envi r onment . She wr ot e: " I n my vi ew, pr ovi di ng surger y, or
even hor mones, t o i ncar cer at ed i ndi vi dual s, i s an undeni abl e
l ower i ng of t he St andar ds, and an expl i ci t vi ol at i on of t he
cr i t er i a r egar di ng soci opat hy and sui ci dal i t y. " Whi l e Osbor ne
r ecogni zed t he St andar ds of Car e as hel pf ul , she not ed t hey had no
r egul at or y aut hor i t y. Al so, t her e was no uni ver sal consensus i n
t he psychi at r i c communi t y about what const i t ut ed medi cal necessi t y
-20-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
21/118
i n t he t r eat ment of gender i dent i t y di sor der . She cr i t i ci zed t he
Fenway Repor t f or f ai l i ng t o addr ess ot her possi bl e t r eat ment
opt i ons f or Kosi l ek or t o pr ovi de an adequat e expl anat i on f or i t s
surger y r ecommendat i on. Kosi l ek, i n Osbor ne' s eyes, had an
unr eal i st i c expectat i on t hat she was owed cer t ai n t r eat ment s and
Kosi l ek woul d i nst ead benef i t f r om a t hor ough assessment f or
psychi at r i c di sor der s and t r eat ment desi gned t o addr ess any such
di sor der s al ong wi t h her gender i dent i t y di sor der .
On May 25, 2005, t he back and f or t h bet ween t he DOC and
UMass cont i nued. Mart i n sent Dr s. Appel baum and Br ewer another
cr i t i ci sm- l aced l et t er . Whi l e t he doct or s had answer ed some of t he
DOC' s quest i ons, t hey had not pr ovi ded a compr ehensi ve r evi ew of
t he appr opr i at eness or necessi t y of sur ger y f or Kosi l ek. Ci t i ng
t he DOC' s Ei ght h Amendment obl i gat i ons, Mar t i n l ament ed t hat
nei t her UMass nor t he Fenway Repor t had of f ered gui dance on whet her
sur ger y was "a medi cal necessi t y f or Kosi l ek. " Fi nal l y, Mar t i n
i nf ormed t hem of t he DOC' s engagement of Osborne to revi ew t he
Fenway Report and encl osed a copy of Osbor ne' s report . Mart i n
asked UMass t o r evi ew t he report and gi ve t he DOC i t s ul t i mate
r ecommendat i on as t o the appr opr i at eness of surgery f or Kosi l ek.
The same day Mar t i n f i r ed of f her l et t er , a news pi ece,
whi ch was hi ghl y negat i ve t owar d Kosi l ek and her quest f or surger y,
appear ed on a l ocal t el evi si on st at i on. Commi ssi oner Dennehy had
been i nter vi ewed f or t he pi ece on May 16, and one of her comment s
-21-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
22/118
made i t on ai r . 14 A Massachuset t s st ate senat or , who had f i l ed
l egi sl at i on seeki ng t o pr ohi bi t t he st at e f r om payi ng f or sex
r eassi gnment sur ger y f or i nmat es, al so spoke t o t he r epor t er .
"When you go t o pr i son you l ose some r i ght s. You al so l ose your
r i ght s t o get a sex change oper at i on, " he st at ed. The senat or , who
was an acquai ntance of Dennehy, had cal l ed Dennehy on her cel l
phone to advi se her t hat he woul d be par t i ci pat i ng i n t he news
pi ece. The pi ece concl uded wi t h t he r epor t er i ndi cat i ng: "Lat er
t hi s week, t he st at e wi l l t el l t he f eder al cour t t hat sex sur ger y
f or Mi chel l e Kosi l ek woul d r esul t i n a secur i t y ni ght mar e. "15
Despi t e the secur i t y concerns t he DOC expr essed t o t he
medi a, Dennehy and her st af f had yet ( as of t he t i me she was
i nt er vi ewed) t o of f i ci al l y convene t o conduct t hei r i nt er nal
secur i t y r evi ew. Not unt i l May 19, t hr ee days af t er her i nt er vi ew,
di d t hey act ual l y meet . I n at t endance were Dennehy, DOC counsel ,
Super i nt endent Spencer of MCI - Norf ol k, and Super i nt endent Lynne
Bi ssonnet t e of MCI - Fr ami ngham, t he women' s pr i son where Kosi l ek
mi ght be sent were she t o under go surger y. Dennehy di d not have
t he benef i t of wr i t t en r epor t s f r omSpencer or Bi ssonnet t e, despi t e
14 She was quot ed: "The cour t s ar e tel l i ng us t hat medi cal
pr of essi onal s make medi cal r ecommendat i ons and cor r ect i onaladmi ni st r at or s assess t he saf et y and secur i t y concer ns. "
15 I t seems l i kel y t hat t he r epor t er l ear ned t hi s i nf or mat i onf r om Dennehy her sel f , t hough i t i s uncl ear whet her i t coul d havecome f r om someone on her st af f . Ei t her way t he DOC does notdi sput e t hat t hi s t i dbi t came f r om wi t hi n t he DOC.
-22-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
23/118
DOC pol i cy cal l i ng f or t he super i nt endent s t o make such
r ecommendat i ons, because ( as Dennehy l at er t est i f i ed) t he secur i t y
concer ns seemed sel f - evi dent .
On J une 10, 2005, t he DOC br ought t he cour t back i nt o the
l oop, f i nal l y f i l i ng t he st at us r epor t whi ch t he cour t had or der ed
back on Apr i l 25. The DOC i nf ormed J udge Wol f i t had deci ded not
t o pr ovi de Kosi l ek wi t h sex r eassi gnment sur ger y. I n suppor t of
i t s deci si on, t he DOC at t ached Osbor ne' s repor t . I t al so at t ached
t he cour t - or der ed secur i t y r epor t , whi ch was pr i nci pal l y aut hor ed
by DOC at t orneys wi t h i nput f r om Dennehy.
The secur i t y r epor t , whi ch sai d i t was based on Dennehy' s
t hi r t y year s of cor r ect i onal knowl edge and exper i ence, as wel l as
t he exper i ence of col l eagues she had spoken wi t h, st ated t he
f ol l owi ng. Al l owi ng t he sur ger y t o go f or war d "woul d cr eat e
subst ant i al saf et y and secur i t y pr obl ems f or DOC. " She cl ai med
t hat out - of - st at e sur ger y, whi ch appear ed t o be t he onl y opt i on
based on a dear t h of doctors i n Massachuset t s, woul d cause " compl ex
secur i t y and l ogi st i cal i ssues" and mi ght gi ve Kosi l ek a chance t o
escape cust ody. Kosi l ek' s post - sur ger y conf i nement was al so a
cause f or concer n. Dennehy argued Kosi l ek woul d be at r i sk f or
sexual assaul t i f she wer e t o r emai n i n a mal e pr i son, and housi ng
her i n a f emal e pr i son woul d come wi t h i t s own host of pr obl ems.
Speci f i cal l y, Dennehy ant i ci pat ed "ser i ous cl i mat e i ssues" si nce
t he maj or i t y of t he women at MCI - Fr ami nghamhad hi st or i es of t r auma
-23-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
24/118
and i t was wel l known t hat Kosi l ek had ki l l ed her wi f e. The women
mi ght pose a t hr eat t o Kosi l ek and vi ce ver sa. Kosi l ek woul d need
t o be i sol at ed and r est r i ct i vel y conf i ned i n ei t her pr i son and
t hi s, Dennehy concl uded, mi ght be del et er i ous t o Kosi l ek' s ment al
heal t h. Ci t i ng t hese concer ns, al ong wi t h what she per cei ved as an
uncl ear st ance f r om UMass on whether sur gery was necessar y, 16 and
gi ven Osbor ne' s cr i t i ques of t he Fenway Repor t , Dennehy i ndi cat ed
t hat t he DOC was denyi ng Kosi l ek' s r equest f or surger y.
Af t er t he st at us r epor t was f i l ed wi t h t he cour t , t he DOC
and UMass cont i nued t o cl ash over what t he DOC per cei ved t o be
UMass' s equi vocat i ons. Dr s. Appel baum and Br ewer di r ect ed a J une
14, 2005 l et t er at t he DOC. Cal l i ng t he DOC' s st at ement s i n i t s
pr evi ous l et t er s and st at us r epor t "di si ngenuous, " t he doct or s
emphasi zed t hat i t was not wi t hi n t hei r pur vi ew t o deci de whet her
sur ger y i s medi cal l y necessar y f or Kosi l ek as t hat t er m i s
contempl at ed by t he Ei ght h Amendment . UMass, t hey expl ai ned, had
consi st ent l y rel i ed on t he exper t i se of out si de consul t ant s, al l of
whom had sai d t he same t hi ng. The doctors agai n under l i ned t hat
sol el y f r oma cl i ni cal per spect i ve i t appear ed t hat Kosi l ek shoul d
be of f er ed sur ger y.
16 The repor t quoted t he supposedl y ambi guous l anguage f r omUMass' s l et t er : " t he t r eat ment r ecommended i n t he Fenwayr epor t . . . appear s t o be r easonabl e and appr opr i at e, si nce t hepat i ent has met cr i t er i a f or t he di agnosi s of gender i dent i t ydi sorder and has r eached a poi nt i n cl i ni cal t r eat ment wher e sexualr eassi gnment sur ger y, i f desi r ed, woul d be t he next st ep. "
-24-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
25/118
On Oct ober 7, 2005, Dr s. Kapi l a and Kauf man prepared and
i ssued anot her r epor t , t hi s one a r esponse t o Osbor ne' s cr i t i ques
of t hei r Fenway Repor t , whi ch t hey sent t o UMass and whi ch UMass
passed on t o t he DOC. Ci t i ng medi cal l i t er at ur e and st udi es, t he
doct or s t ook ai m at Osbor ne' s cr i t i ci sms, expl ai ni ng why her
chal l enges t o t hei r r ecommendat i on f or sur ger y wer e cl i ni cal l y
unf ounded or i r r el evant . The r epor t al so ar gued t hat Kosi l ek was
st abl e, not cur r ent l y sui ci dal , and a good candi dat e f or sur ger y.
The doct or s st r enuousl y i nsi st ed t hat t hei r r ecommendat i on of
sur ger y was an i nf or med cl i ni cal j udgment r oot ed i n Kosi l ek' s
gender i dent i t y di sorder di agnosi s, her mar ked ment al heal t h
i mpr ovement si nce bei ng pr ovi ded hormones and bei ng al l owed t o l i ve
as a woman, and t he wel l - document ed ef f ect i veness of surgery. The
doct or s r ei t er at ed t hei r r ecommendat i on t hat Kosi l ek be pr ovi ded
wi t h t he sur ger y. Dr . Appel baum submi t t ed t hi s r epor t t o t he DOC
on Oct ober 17, 2005, r est at i ng UMass' s endor sement of t he or i gi nal
Fenway Repor t ' s r ecommendat i ons and request i ng t hat t he DOC i ssue
a deci si on appr ovi ng t hose r ecommendat i ons.
As t o t he st at us of Kosi l ek' s l awsui t , as of J ul y 2005,
Kosi l ek had l et al l t he medi cal pr ovi der def endant s ( Dr s. Appel baum
and Br ewer , and UMass, among ot her s) out of t he case. That same
mont h she f i l ed an amended compl ai nt , t hi s t i me wi t h t he benef i t of
an at t orney, wi t h Dennehy as t he sol e named def endant . Kosi l ek no
l onger sought damages, she onl y r equest ed i nj unct i ve r el i ef
-25-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
26/118
r equi r i ng t he DOC t o pr ovi de her wi t h adequate medi cal care,
i ncl udi ng sex r eassi gnment sur ger y. The case went t o t r i al a
l i t t l e l ess than a year l at er .
F. The Kosilek II Trial
1. Round One of Testimony
The non- j ury t r i al , whi ch l i ke Kosi l ek I was presi ded
over by J udge Wol f ( by t hen Chi ef J udge) , began on May 30, 2006.
Test i mony i ni t i al l y went unt i l t he end of J une, wi t h mul t i pl e
wi t nesses t est i f yi ng. 17
Fi r st t he cour t hear d f r om Geor ge Br own, M. D. , a
pr act i ci ng psychi at r i st who hel ped aut hor t he St andar ds of Car e,
and who t est i f i ed as an exper t on Kosi l ek' s behal f ( he al so
t est i f i ed i n Kosi l ek I ) . As he had done back i n 2001, Dr . Br own
eval uated Kosi l ek and r evi ewed her medi cal r ecor ds. He pr epared a
wr i t t en r epor t , and i n i t di agnosed Kosi l ek wi t h chr oni c and sever e
gender i dent i t y di sor der . He di d not t hi nk she met t he cr i t er i a
f or ant i soci al per sonal i t y di sor der . Dr . Br own al so di d not t hi nk
Kosi l ek was t r yi ng t o game the syst em, wr i t i ng t hat he was " har d
pr essed t o devel op a rat i onal expl anat i on f or why someone woul d
wor k so f er vent l y to obt ai n t hi s ser i ous, pai nf ul sur ger y" ot her
t han as a means t o t r eat gender i dent i t y di sorder . Dr . Br own al so
opi ned t hat Kosi l ek had met or exceeded t he readi ness cr i t er i a f or
17 We summari ze t he t est i mony i n the or der i t was gi ven, savef or Dr . Schmi dt . He actual l y t est i f i ed bef or e Kosi l ek f i ni shedput t i ng on her wi t nesses ( we assume f or schedul i ng conveni ence) .
-26-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
27/118
sex r eass i gnment sur ger y. Among other t hi ngs, she had compl eted a
mor e t han t wo- year moni t or ed, r eal - l i f e exper i ence l i vi ng as a
woman whi l e i ncar cer at ed. Fur t her , he wr ot e, Kosi l ek had " r ecei ved
an unambi guous di agnosi s of severe gender i dent i t y di sorder f r omno
f ewer t han ni ne ment al heal t h pr of essi onal s who have i nt er vi ewed
her , many of whomare r ecogni zed i nt er nat i onal exper t s i n t he f i el d
of gender i dent i t y di sor der . " Dr . Br own st r essed, "[ n] o f ur t her
t r eat ment or r eal - l i f e exper i ence i s necessar y, " and Kosi l ek shoul d
r ecei ve t he sur gery, whi ch Dr . Br own deemed "medi cal l y necessary. "
Hammer i ng the poi nt home, Dr . Br own test i f i ed, consi st ent
wi t h hi s wr i t t en r epor t , t hat t he hor mones and psychot her apy
Kosi l ek was r ecei vi ng, t hough t hey had hel ped r el i eve her
dysphor i a, wer e "[ a] bsol ut el y not " suf f i ci ent t o el i mi nat e t he
ser i ous r i sk of har m Kosi l ek f aced, up t o and i ncl udi ng sui ci de.
When asked whet her sex reassi gnment surger y was medi cal l y
necessar y, Dr . Br own st at ed: "Absol ut el y. I f I can wal k away f r om
t hese pr oceedi ngs wi t h one poi nt bei ng cl ear i n peopl e' s mi nds,
i t ' s that . " Wi t hout sur ger y, he added, "t he degr ee of l i kel i hood
of [ Kosi l ek] suf f er i ng ser i ous medi cal consequences up t o and
i ncl udi ng sui ci de ar e exceedi ngl y hi gh. " As f or ant i depr essant s,
t hey ar e f or t he t r eat ment of pat i ent s wi t h maj or depr essi ve
di sorder , whi ch Dr . Br own st r essed Kosi l ek di d not have. Wi t h
r egar ds t o gender i dent i t y di sorder , such ant i depr essant
medi cat i ons had been shown t o be "very i nef f ect i ve" as t hey mi ght
-27-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
28/118
onl y sl i ght l y r el i eve some depr essi ve sympt oms but woul d not t r eat
t he under l yi ng gender i dent i t y di sorder . Onl y sur ger y, Dr . Br own
t est i f i ed, had t he "si gni f i cant pot ent i al " t o cur e Kosi l ek' s
medi cal condi t i on.
Next came Dr . Kennet h Appel baum' s t est i mony. The Fenway
Cent er doct or s, he sai d, had si gni f i cant exper i ence i n t he ar ea of
gender i dent i t y di sor der and wer e wel l - t r ai ned, cr edent i al ed, and
knowl edgeabl e. He t hought t hei r assessment s wer e t ypi cal l y
r easonabl e and consi st ent wi t h t he appr oaches f ol l owed by most
ot her medi cal pr ovi der s. I n gener al , Dr . Appel baumdi d not see why
t he DOC woul d need t o consul t wi t h Osbor ne ( an out - of - st ate,
mast er ' s- l evel soci al wor ker ) gi ven t hat i t had al r eady recei ved
t he r ecommendat i ons of t he Fenway Cent er doct ors ( a l ocal physi ci an
and doct or al psychol ogi st ) , who wer e, i n Dr . Appel baum' s mi nd,
hi ghl y exper i enced i n deal i ng wi t h gender i dent i t y di sor der . As
f or Osbor ne, Dr . Appel baum r ecal l ed t hat t he DOC' s Hughes had
comment ed t hat she woul d be more sensi t i ve t o t he DOC' s concerns
because she di d not bel i eve sex reass i gnment sur gery was
appr opr i at e i n t he cor r ect i ons set t i ng. Fi nal l y, Dr . Appel baum
t est i f i ed t hat f r omhi s conver sat i ons wi t h Kosi l ek' s t r eat ment t eam
at t he pr i son, i t was hi s under st andi ng Kosi l ek had shown good
adj ust ment bei ng on hormones and r ecei vi ng t herapy.
Dr . Randi Kauf man f r om t he Fenway Cent er t hen t ook t he
st and. She r ei t er at ed t he concl usi on she made i n her r epor t , i n
-28-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
29/118
par t i cul ar t hat Kosi l ek had successf ul l y compl et ed t he r eal - l i f e
exper i ence cont empl ated by t he St andards of Care. She al so
t est i f i ed t hat , t o a r easonabl e degr ee of medi cal cer t ai nt y, t her e
was a "ver y hi gh l i kel i hood" Kosi l ek woul d at t empt sui ci de i f
deni ed t r eat ment f or her gender i dent i t y di sorder . Though Kosi l ek
benef i t t ed f r om bei ng on hor mones, Dr . Kauf man f el t Kosi l ek had a
l evel of gender i dent i t y di sor der t hat coul d not be t r eat ed wi t h
anyt hi ng l ess t han sur ger y. "She' s done al l t he t hi ngs t hat peopl e
do t o change t hei r gender pr esent at i on, " she sai d, and " [ t ] her e
r eal l y i sn' t anyt hi ng l ef t except f or sur ger y. " Kosi l ek had a
medi cal need f or t he surger y.
Mar k Bur r owes, a l i censed ment al heal t h counsel or wi t h a
mast er ' s degr ee i n counsel i ng psychol ogy, who had been t r eat i ng
Kosi l ek f or f our or f i ve year s, al so t est i f i ed. Kosi l ek, he
agr eed, was r eady f or sex r eass i gnment surgery. Not havi ng t he
surger y woul d be det r i ment al and coul d r esul t i n Kosi l ek maki ng an
at t empt on her l i f e. Sui ci de moni t or i ng woul d not be an adequat e
al t er nat i ve t o sur ger y si nce Kosi l ek' s mal e geni t al i a st i l l caused
her di st r ess.
Fi nal l y, Mi chel l e Kosi l ek was cal l ed by her at t or neys.
She spoke about her l i f e at MCI - Nor f ol k. Gener al l y she got al ong
qui t e wel l wi t h most of t he peopl e t here, t hough a smal l per cent age
of t he cor r ect i on of f i cer s gave her a har d t i me. Kosi l ek had,
si nce she got t o pr i son, wor ked on a dai l y basi s. She t est i f i ed
-29-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
30/118
t hat t he hormone t r eat ment s had made her a l i t t l e l ess depr essed
but she cont i nued t o f eel di st r ess over her body. Kosi l ek, who
sai d she was not cur r ent l y sui ci dal , f el t t he hor mones wer e not
enough and she needed surgery. She di d not want t o cont i nue l i vi ng
wi t h her mal e geni t al i a and, i f deni ed sur ger y, ant i depr essant s and
psychotherapy woul d not hel p mat t ers.
The DOC t hen put on i t s case. Fi r st , Chest er Schmi dt ,
M. D. , a psychi at r i st at t he J ohns Hopki ns School of Medi ci ne, and
associ at e di r ect or of t he J ohns Hopki ns Cent er f or Sexual Heal t h
and Medi ci ne, t est i f i ed as an expert f or t he DOC. He became
i nvol ved i n t hi s case t hr ough hi s connect i on wi t h Cynt hi a Osbor ne.
As t o hi s gener al appr oach f or t r eat i ng pat i ent s wi t h gender
i dent i t y di sor der , Dr . Schmi dt st at ed he does ut i l i ze t he St andar ds
of Car e but t hi nks of t hem mor e as pr ot ocol s or gui del i nes, as
opposed t o actual st andar ds of car e. He does not agr ee wi t h t he
i dea, set f or t h i n t he St andar ds of Car e, t hat sex r eassi gnment
sur ger y i s medi cal l y necessary i n pat i ent s wi t h sever e gender
i dent i t y di sor der . I n f act , Dr . Schmi dt di d not r ecal l ever seei ng
a case where he t hought sur gery was medi cal l y necessary. I t was
hi s and hi s J ohns Hopki ns col l eagues' pr act i ce t o nei t her advocat e
nor speak agai nst a pat i ent ' s desi r e f or sur ger y, but t o l eave i t
i n t he hands of t he pat i ent . He woul d not send a l et t er of
r ecommendat i on t o a sur geon on behal f of a pat i ent , but he woul d
-30-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
31/118
r el ease hi s f i l e t o t he sur geon and si mpl y i ndi cat e he saw no
cont r ai ndi cat i ons t o sur ger y.
Af t er gi vi ng hi s gener al over vi ew, Dr . Schmi dt t ur ned hi s
f ocus t o Kosi l ek, whom he had personal l y eval uated i n November
2005. Kosi l ek di d meet t he cr i t er i a f or gender i dent i t y di sor der ,
he concl uded. However , Dr . Schmi dt di d not bel i eve surgery was
medi cal l y necessar y as Kosi l ek, he theor i zed, had made an
"excel l ent adapt at i on" wi t hout sur ger y t hus f ar . He al so f el t t he
r eal - l i f e exper i ence cont empl at ed i n t he St andar ds of Car e was
vi r t ual l y i mpossi bl e t o r epl i cat e i n pr i son. But besi des t hi s
bar r i er , Dr . Schmi dt admi t t ed he di d not see any cont r ai ndi cat i ons
t o surger y. Shoul d Kosi l ek become depr essed i f she di d not r ecei ve
t he surger y, Dr . Schmi dt t hought she coul d be t r eat ed wi t h
ant i depressant s and psychother apy, and managed i n a medi cal
f aci l i t y shoul d her sui ci dal desi r es become sever e. Thi s l at t er
scenar i o was a possi bi l i t y, as Dr . Schmi dt r ecogni zed Kosi l ek' s
r i sk of sui ci de based on what she had sai d and done i n t he past .
But , Dr . Schmi dt opi ned, psychot herapy and medi cat i ons coul d
ef f ect i vel y r educe Kosi l ek' s dysphor i a t o a l evel wher e she was no
l onger at r i sk f or ser i ous har m.
Next Cynt hi a Osbor ne, t he J ohns Hopki ns soci al worker and
DOC consul t ant , gave t est i mony echoi ng Dr . Schmi dt . By t he t i me of
t r i al , she had met wi t h and i nt ervi ewed Kosi l ek. Osbor ne agr eed
wi t h Kosi l ek' s sever e gender i dent i t y di sor der di agnosi s. Yet ,
-31-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
32/118
l i ke Dr . Schmi dt , i n gener al , she di d not bel i eve t he r eal - l i f e
exper i ence cal l ed f or by t he St andar ds of Car e coul d happen i n a
pr i son envi r onment . Al so, Kosi l ek was not , i n her opi ni on, a good
candi dat e f or sex r eassi gnment sur ger y, nor was i t medi cal l y
necessary, because Kosi l ek had r esponded ver y wel l t o hormone
t r eat ment . Rather , Osbor ne t hought support gr oups or gr oup t herapy
coul d be used t o t r eat Kosi l ek ef f ect i vel y. Kosi l ek' s t hr eat s of
sui ci de i f deni ed surgery di d not change Osbor ne' s mi nd on what
t r eat ment was warr ant ed. I ndeed, she mi ni mi zed concer ns about
sui ci de by not i ng that any good ment al heal t h syst emwoul d know how
t o deal wi t h a pat i ent ' s sui ci dal i t y. Osbor ne, agai n l i ke Dr .
Schmi dt , di d not f ul l y agr ee wi t h t he St andar ds of Car e' s s t at ement
t hat sex r eass i gnment surger y i s medi cal l y necessar y i n cases of
sever e gender i dent i t y di sor der .
Lui s Spencer , t hen st i l l Super i nt endent of MCI - Nor f ol k,
al so t est i f i ed f or t he DOC. He expl ai ned t he set - up at MCI -
Nor f ol k, descr i bi ng i t as havi ng one of t he mor e secur e per i met er s
i n Massachuset t s. I t i s sur r ounded by wal l s on al l si des, an
el ect r i f i ed f ence, and guar d tower s whi ch ar e manned twent y- f our
hour s a day, seven days a week. Appr oxi matel y one- t hi r d of t he
i nmat es at MCI - Nor f ol k, Spencer expl ai ned, ar e ser vi ng a l i f e
sent ence and one- t hi r d have commi t t ed sexual f el oni es.
Spencer al so t est i f i ed about Kosi l ek. She had adj ust ed
f ai r l y wel l t o l i f e at MCI - Nor f ol k and had not r epor t ed any thr eat s
-32-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
33/118
or har assment f r om ot her i nmat es. As of t he t i me of t r i al , no
secur i t y concer ns i nvol vi ng Kosi l ek had ar i sen; however , Spencer
had some appr ehensi on goi ng f orward shoul d Kosi l ek r ecei ve t he
surger y. He woul d have "gr ave concer ns" put t i ng Kosi l ek back i n
t he gener al popul at i on wi t h t he f ul l anat omy of a f emal e. Spencer
worr i ed t hat she coul d be r aped or assaul t ed and he saw no
al t er nat i ve but t o house her i n t he hi gh- secur i t y Speci al
Management Uni t . Thi s uni t was a st andal one secur e bui l di ng where
Kosi l ek woul d r emai n i n her cel l t went y- t hr ee hour s a day and coul d
onl y l eave when shackl ed and escor t ed by t wo guards. The
quest i oni ng al so br i ef l y t ouched on Kosi l ek' s t hr eat s of sui ci de
wer e she not t o r ecei ve t he sur ger y. Spencer sai d hi s pol i cy i s
not t o negot i at e wi t h i nmat es who thr eat en sui ci de, as t o do so
woul d under mi ne hi s and t he st af f ' s aut hor i t y. Rat her , he woul d
i mpl ement t he DOC' s ment al heal t h pol i cy and t ake the appr opr i ate
st eps t o guar d a sui ci dal i nmat e' s saf et y.
Gr egory Hughes, who was t he DOC' s Di r ect or of Ment al
Heal t h and Subst ance Abuse Servi ces unt i l 2005, and who hol ds a
mast er ' s degr ee i n soci al wor k, was quest i oned next . Hughes
t est i f i ed about t he af t er mat h of Kosi l ek I and t he DOC' s ef f or t s t o
compl y wi t h t he cour t ' s deci si on. Hi s r ol e i ncl uded over seei ng and
f aci l i t at i ng t he ser vi ces suppl i ed t o Kosi l ek, and i n par t i cul ar
maki ng happen t he i ndependent eval uat i on J udge Wol f ordered i n
Kosi l ek I . He t est i f i ed about hi s di ssat i sf act i on wi t h t he Fenway
-33-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
34/118
Repor t , quest i oni ng i t s t hor oughness and i t s heavy r el i ance on
Kosi l ek' s sel f - r epor t i ng. He was concer ned t hat t he doct or s had
not r evi ewed any of Kosi l ek' s medi cal r ecor ds or ment al heal t h
hi st or y or i nt er vi ewed ot her peopl e t o ver i f y Kosi l ek' s sel f -
r eport s. And whi l e Hughes knew t he doctors suggest ed surgery, he
sai d he was uncer t ai n about whether t here were ot her
r ecommendat i ons and what next st ep t he DOC shoul d t ake. Because he
was concer ned wi t h t he Fenway Repor t ' s qual i t y, Hughes had deci ded
t o cont act Osbor ne. Hughes al so t est i f i ed t hat he r epor t ed hi s
concerns about t he report t o Dr s. Appel baumand Br ewer and t hat t he
DOC sought t hei r t hought s dur i ng st af f meet i ngs. Hughes recal l ed
t he doct or s sayi ng t her e wer e no cont r ai ndi cat i ons t o sur ger y but
di d not bel i eve t hey used t he t er m "medi cal l y necessary. "
Rober t Dumond, who was t he Di r ect or of t he DOC' s Research
and Pl anni ng Di vi si on, and who had pr evi ousl y pr ovi ded ment al
heal t h scr eeni ngs at MCI - Frami ngham, t est i f i ed on t he DOC' s behal f .
Dumond, who had a mast er ' s degree i n psychol ogy and exper i ence i n
t he ar eas of vi ct i mi zat i on and sexual assaul t i n t he pr i son system,
was asked by the DOC t o consi der t he r i sk f actor s f or post -
oper at i ve i ndi vi dual s i n pr i son. Pl aci ng Kosi l ek at MCI - Frami ngham
post - sur ger y, he r esponded, coul d "dest abi l i ze[ ] t he saf et y and
secur i t y of t he i nst i t ut i on" and creat e a r i sk f or Kosi l ek t o
become a vi ct i m or vi ct i mi zer .
-34-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
35/118
Ar t hur Beel er was al so cal l ed by the DOC t o t est i f y about
secur i t y i ssues. Beel er , a t hi r t y- year empl oyee wi t h t he Feder al
Bur eau of Pr i sons, was warden at t he Federal Cor r ect i on Compl ex,
Feder al Medi cal Cent er i n Buckner , Nor t h Car ol i na. Beel er t our ed
MCI - Nor f ol k and MCI - Fr ami ngham, spoke wi t h Super i nt endent Spencer ,
and r evi ewed t he DOC' s ment al heal t h pol i ci es i n pr epar at i on f or
hi s test i mony. I n hi s opi ni on, Kosi l ek was cur r ent l y saf e and
secur e at MCI - Nor f ol k, based i n par t on t he set - up of t he
f aci l i t i es and her cel l and t he f act t hat Kosi l ek had never been
assaul t ed t her e. Beel er i ndi cat ed t hat he "woul d be ver y
concer ned" about pl aci ng Kosi l ek i n t he women' s gener al popul at i on
at MCI - Frami ngham and was sat i sf i ed t hat t he ment al heal t h
pr ocedur e at MCI - Nor f ol k was suf f i ci ent t o addr ess i nmat e sui ci de
i deat i on and behavi or . Beel er caut i oned agai nst gi vi ng i n t o an
i nmat e' s t hr eat s of sui ci de, l i keni ng i t t o openi ng Pandor a' s box.
Beel er was not per mi t t ed t o t est i f y speci f i cal l y about whet her
secur i t y concer ns shoul d pr ecl ude Kosi l ek f r om get t i ng sur ger y
because, t he cour t f ound, he was not suf f i ci ent l y i nf or med about
" t he f act s concer ni ng Kosi l ek" because Beel er had not l ooked at her
di sci pl i nar y or medi cal r ecor ds.
Susan Mar t i n, t he DOC' s Di r ect or of Heal t h Ser vi ces
dur i ng t he r el evant t i me per i od, was next up. Af t er speaki ng some
about t he cont r act ual r el at i onshi p between t he DOC and UMass,
Mar t i n t ur ned t o t he Fenway Cent er ' s eval uat i on of Kosi l ek. Li ke
-35-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
36/118
Hughes, she was not sat i sf i ed wi t h t he eval uat i on. Mar t i n di d not
t hi nk t he Fenway Report was ver y t horough and she r ai sed t hi s
concern t o UMass at t he t i me. Though Mar t i n knew t he Fenway Cent er
doct ors were recommendi ng sur gery, she di d not t hi nk t hey were
cl ear enough about what exact l y needed t o happen and when. Because
of t hese per cei ved omi ssi ons, Mart i n deci ded t o have Osbor ne revi ew
t he r epor t .
When asked about UMass' s r ol e, Mart i n i ndi cated she
t hought i t was UMass' s j ob t o determi ne whether t he Fenway Cent er ' s
r ecommendat i ons "wer e medi cal l y necessar y and cl i ni cal l y sound, "
and UMass, she sai d, woul d not do t hi s. She consi der ed i t UMass' s
r esponsi bi l i t y t o f i nd a sur geon, and si mpl y pr ovi di ng t he DOC wi t h
a l i st of possi bl e sur geons was not suf f i ci ent .
Next came DOC Commi ssi oner Kat hl een Dennehy' s t est i mony.
I f f aced wi t h a cour t or der compel l i ng t he DOC t o pr ovi de Kosi l ek
wi t h sex reassi gnment sur gery, Dennehy sai d she woul d pr obabl y
r et i r e bef ore i mpl ement i ng somethi ng she consi dered unsaf e. And
based "st r i ct l y [ on] saf et y and secur i t y concer ns" she sai d she
woul d st i l l vet o t he sur ger y even i f UMass t ol d her i t was
medi cal l y necessary and even i f Kosi l ek woul d l i kel y at t empt
sui ci de i f deni ed t he sur ger y. ( Dennehy cl ai med she was st i l l
awai t i ng cl ear di r ect i on f r om UMass. )
When asked, Dennehy acknowl edged her awar eness of t he
negat i ve publ i c at t ent i on t hat Kosi l ek' s bi d had been r ecei vi ng.
-36-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
37/118
She admi t t ed she knew t hat a Massachuset t s senat or , who she was
f r i endl y wi t h and who had spoken i n t he news pi ece, vocal l y opposed
sex r eass i gnment surgery f or i nmates and was pushi ng f or
l egi sl at i on t o put a st op t o i t s pr ovi si on. She al so sai d she knew
of t he Massachuset t s Li eut enant Gover nor ' s opposi t i on t o sur ger y
f or t r ansgender i nmat es.
Fi nal l y, Lynne Bi ssonnet t e, Super i nt endent of MCI -
Frami ngham, was cal l ed upon t o di scuss t he f easi bi l i t y of Kosi l ek' s
post - oper at i ve pl acement t her e. She expl ai ned t he set - up at MCI -
Fr ami ngham. The women l i ved i n mul t i - person r ooms or dor mi t ory-
st yl e housi ng uni t s, wi t h t he except i on of t he women i n t he
segr egat i on or medi cal uni t s who had si ngl e cel l s. For t he most
par t t he bui l di ngs at MCI - Fr ami ngham wer e sur r ounded by a si ngl e,
non- el ect r i f i ed t wel ve- f oot - hi gh f ence. Ther e had been,
Bi ssonnet t e i ndi cat ed, no pr i soner escapes dur i ng her t hr ee- year
t enure at Fr ami ngham.
As f or t he popul at i on at t he f aci l i t y, accor di ng t o
Bi ssonnet t e, a l arge maj or i t y of t he women t here had been vi ct i ms
of domest i c vi ol ence or sexual assaul t . Al so, a maj or i t y had
ment al heal t h i ssues wi t h about a hal f r ecei vi ng medi cat i on f or
t hose i ssues. Bi ssonnet t e st at ed t hat i f a woman coul d not
ef f ect i vel y be mai nt ai ned by t he ment al heal t h pr of essi onal s at t he
pr i son, she was sent f or i npat i ent t r eat ment at a Massachuset t s
Depar t ment of Ment al Heal t h f aci l i t y, wher e secur i t y was not t he
-37-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
38/118
equi val ent of what was pr ovi ded at t he pr i son. And whereas
Massachuset t s pr ovi des a speci al secur e hospi t al f or mal e
pr i soner s, Br i dgewat er St at e Hospi t al , she expl ai ned t hat no
compar at i ve f aci l i t y exi st s f or women.
Bi ssonnet t e' s t est i mony t hen t ur ned t o Kosi l ek
speci f i cal l y, whose cr i mi nal r ecor d she had r evi ewed. Bi ssonnet t e
di d not t hi nk Kosi l ek was an appr opr i at e candi dat e t o be housed at
MCI - Frami nghampost - oper at i vel y and not ed sever al concer ns. Fi r st ,
Bi ssonnet t e consi der ed Kosi l ek a f l i ght r i sk based on t he weak
per i met er at MCI - Fr ami ngham, t he l engt h of Kosi l ek' s sent ence, and
t he f act t hat Kosi l ek had f l ed Massachuset t s af t er ki l l i ng her
wi f e. 18 Second, Bi ssonnet t e wor r i ed about t he l ack of avai l abl e
i npat i ent ment al heal t h car e. Kosi l ek woul d have t o be sent t o a
l ess secur e hospi t al f or t he gener al publ i c shoul d she r equi r e
car e. Thi r d, Bi ssonnet t e consi der ed Kosi l ek bot h a pot ent i al
pr edat or and vi ct i m wi t hi n t he i nmat e popul at i on — a pr edat or
because Kosi l ek had st r angl ed her wi f e and a vi ct i mbecause a l ar ge
pr oport i on of MCI - Fr ami ngham' s popul at i on had been t he vi ct i ms of
domest i c vi ol ence and sexual abuse and mi ght seek t o harm her .
Fur t her , and f or essent i al l y those same r easons, Bi ssonnet t e f el t
Kosi l ek woul d have a negat i ve ef f ect on t he pr i son popul at i on.
18 Bi ssonnet t e consi der ed Kosi l ek' s ear l i er f l i ght , even t hought he DOC cl assi f i cat i on manual says pr e- cust odi al f l i ght shoul d notbe consi der ed when cl assi f yi ng i nmat es.
-38-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
39/118
I n l i ght of al l of t hese concer ns, wer e Bi ssonnet t e
r equi r ed t o house Kosi l ek, she woul d put her i n t he Cl ose Cust ody
Uni t , t he si ngl e cel l segr egat i on uni t , wher e i nmat es cannot hol d
any empl oyment and are pl aced i n r est r ai nt s whenever t hey l eave t he
cel l . Si nce Kosi l ek i s ser vi ng a l i f e sent ence, Bi ssonnet t e
expr essed concern t hat housi ng her i n an envi r onment t hi s
r est r i ct i ve f or such an ext ended per i od of t i me woul d have a
negat i ve i mpact on Kosi l ek' s ment al heal t h.
On cross- exami nat i on Bi ssonnet t e made a f ew concessi ons.
She agr eed t hat MCI - Fr ami nghamcur r ent l y houses appr oxi mat el y f or t y
of f ender s who ar e ser vi ng l i f e sent ences f or mur der . Fur t her , t he
i nst i t ut i on houses i n t he gener al popul at i on i nmat es who ar e
convi ct ed of hei nous cr i mes agai nst chi l dr en al ongsi de pr i soner s
who ar e mot her s. Bi ssonnet t e expl ai ned t hat i f i nmat es ar e
percei ved t o exper i ence t r auma based on t he pr esence of other
i nmat es, t her e ar e pol i ci es and pr ocedur es i n pl ace t o f ol l ow ( such
as si mpl y or der i ng a cel l t r ansf er ) and t he ment al heal t h and
secur i t y st af f woul d r espond appr opr i at el y. Though Bi ssonnet t e
agai n acknowl edged Kosi l ek coul d be housed i n t he Cl ose Cust ody
Uni t saf el y, she per si st ed t hat t hi s was not t he "best set t i ng f or
any i nmat e over a l ong per i od of t i me. " 19
19 Dur i ng t he f i r st r ound of t est i mony some more negat i ve pr esscame out . The Bost on Gl obe r an an edi t or i al on J une 15, 2006,whi ch t ook t he posi t i on t hat Kosi l ek shoul d not r ecei ve t hesur ger y. The edi t or i al r ef er r ed t o t he "di st ast ef ul ness of a wi f eki l l er angl i ng t o ser ve out hi s sent ence of l i f e wi t hout par ol e i n
-39-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
40/118
2. Responses to the First Round of Testimony
Af t er t he f i r st bout of t est i mony, whi ch concl uded at t he
end of J une 2006, J udge Wol f t hen di r ected t he UMass doct ors t o
r evi ew Dr . Schmi dt ' s t est i mony and t o i nf or mt he cour t whet her t he
l at t er ' s pr oposed appr oach was wi t hi n pr udent pr of essi onal
st andar ds. Dr s. Appel baum and Br ewer r esponded i n a r epor t f i l ed
wi t h t he cour t on Sept ember 18, 2006. They cont i nued t o endorse
t he Fenway Cent er doct or s' concl usi on t hat Kosi l ek had a ser i ous
medi cal need r equi r i ng sur ger y. I n t hei r opi ni on, Dr . Schmi dt ' s
pr oposed al t er nat i ve cour se of psychot her apy, medi cat i on, and
sui ci de wat ch f el l "out si de t he bounds of accept abl e pr of essi onal
st andar ds" and woul d not const i t ut e "adequat e medi cal car e. " Such
i nt er vent i ons woul d "l i kel y do l i t t l e" t o r educe Kosi l ek' s
dysphor i a or t he r i sk of har m t o her . Onl y sur ger y, t hey
concl uded, coul d do t hi s, and t her e was " no good cl i ni cal r eason t o
wi t hhol d t hat t r eat ment at t hi s t i me. "
The j udge al so or der ed Dennehy t o r evi ew t he evi dence
pr esent ed at t r i al and deci de whet her t he DOC woul d rever se i t s
posi t i on on sur ger y f or Kosi l ek. Af t er doi ng so, Dennehy i ndi cat ed
t o t he cour t t hat Dr s. Appel baum' s and Br ewer ' s t est i mony conf i r med
what she suspect ed ( but appar ent l y di d not pr evi ousl y f i nd cl ear ) :
t hat t he doct or s bel i eved surger y was medi cal l y necessar y. Dennehy
st ood f i r mt hough; she advi sed J udge Wol f t hat her deci si on not t o
a women' s pr i son. "
-40-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
41/118
al l ow sex r eassi gnment sur ger y f or Kosi l ek r emai ned. Her saf et y
and secur i t y concer ns wi t h pr ovi di ng surger y, whi ch Dennehy cal l ed
"al ar mi ng and subst ant i al , " had not changed.
3. Second Round of Testimony
Test i mony r esumed i n ear l y Oct ober 2006, wi t h var i ous
wi t nesses t aki ng and r e- t aki ng t he st and. Fi r st came Dr .
Appel baum, who emphasi zed sever al poi nt s. Kosi l ek had a ser i ous
medi cal need because t her e was a ser i ous r i sk of har m i f she was
not adequatel y t r eat ed; and he had i nf ormed Dennehy of t hi s.
Ant i depr essant s wer e unl i kel y t o ef f ect i vel y t r eat Kosi l ek because
t he sour ce of her di st r ess was her gender i dent i t y di sorder and
medi cat i on woul d not t ar get t hi s under l yi ng condi t i on. Rat her ,
surger y, he expl ai ned, was t he " r ecogni zed and appr opr i at e
t r eat ment " and t he onl y t r eat ment " l i kel y t o si gni f i cant l y r el i eve,
i f not el i mi nat e Mi ss Kosi l ek' s di st r ess. "
Dr . Kevi n Kapi l a f r om t he Fenway Cent er al so spoke. He
cal l ed Kosi l ek' s gender i dent i t y di sor der "one of t he mor e sever e
cases" he had ever seen and he test i f i ed about t he report he and
Dr . Kauf man had wr i t t en. I n hi s opi ni on, Kosi l ek had a ser i ous
medi cal need and t her e was a subst ant i al r i sk of har m i f she was
not t r eat ed wi t h sur ger y. Dr . Kapi l a al so t est i f i ed t hat he
t hought Dr . Schmi dt ' s r ecommendat i on was unr easonabl e.
Speci f i cal l y, Dr . Kapi l a ( who had r evi ewed Dr . Schmi dt ' s t est i mony)
opi ned t o a r easonabl e degr ee of medi cal cer t ai nt y t hat Dr .
-41-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
42/118
Schmi dt ' s pl an t o t r eat Kosi l ek wi t h psychot her apy and medi cat i on
was i nadequat e. Poi nt i ng t o hi s own eval uat i on of Kosi l ek af t er
she had been r ecei vi ng psychotherapy and hormones f or sevent een
mont hs, Dr . Kapi l a not ed her sympt oms had st i l l not r esol ved; "she
st i l l was deal i ng wi t h di scomf or t ar ound havi ng mal e geni t al i a. "
Dr . Schmi dt ' s appr oach woul d not deal wi t h t hi s core pr obl em—onl y
sur ger y coul d — and, Dr . Kapi l a cont i nued, one t r i es t o t r eat t he
probl em, not merel y t he symptoms.
Dr . Kauf man t hen got r ecal l ed. Whi l e she agr eed
Kosi l ek' s dysphor i a had i mpr oved as a resul t of r ecei vi ng hor mone
t r eat ment s and gender - appr opr i at e i t ems and cl ot hi ng, Dr . Kauf man
per si st ed i n opi ni ng t hat Kosi l ek st i l l had a ser i ous medi cal need
and i f she di d not r ecei ve sur ger y t her e was a subst ant i al r i sk of
ser i ous har m. Despi t e al l t he t r eat ment Kosi l ek had r ecei ved, she
st i l l cont i nued t o exper i ence sever e dysphor i a. Li ke Dr . Kapi l a,
Dr . Kauf man di d not t hi nk t he t r eat ment advocat ed by Dr . Schmi dt
was adequat e. I t i s i mpor t ant t o di st i ngui sh bet ween depr essi on
and dysphor i a, she sai d, and Dr . Schmi dt ' s t r eat ment woul d not
suf f i ci ent l y addr ess t he l at t er .
UMass' s Medi cal Di r ect or , Dr . Ar t hur Br ewer , was up next .
He had l i t t l e t o add t o t he t est i mony of t he ot her medi cal
pr ovi der s because, as medi cal di r ect or , he was not i nvol ved i n
UMass' s ment al heal t h pr ogr am and had no r ol e i n Kosi l ek' s
t r eat ment . Hi s posi t i on r emai ned t he same as i n hi s and Dr .
-42-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
43/118
Appel baum' s Sept ember 18, 2006 l et t er , whi ch suppor t ed t he Fenway
Cent er doct or s and cr i t i ci zed Dr . Schmi dt ' s appr oach.
J udge Wol f t hen agai n hear d f r om Commi ssi oner Dennehy.
She accept ed t hat Kosi l ek had a ser i ous medi cal need but sai d she
had pr evi ousl y been conf used about whether sur gery was medi cal l y
necessary. Whi l e she had now "deduced" UMass' s opi ni on on t he
appr opr i at eness of surgery f or Kosi l ek, she had not changed her
t hought s on t he secur i t y and saf et y concer ns r el at ed t o pr ovi di ng
such sur gery. Absent t hese concer ns, Dennehy agr eed she woul d have
no reason t o i nt er f er e wi t h any medi cal or der f or t r eat ment .
The cour t quest i oned Dennehy about her awar eness of any
publ i ci t y sur r oundi ng Kosi l ek' s case. Dennehy was gener al l y awar e
of a coupl e of ar t i cl es appear i ng i n t he Bost on paper s and admi t t ed
ski mmi ng one. She al so knew about an ar t i cl e on a nat i onal news
medi a websi t e. I n gener al she t r i ed not t o r ead newspaper ar t i cl es
t hat i nvol ved her and she never t hought about what t he publ i c and
pol i t i cal r eact i on woul d be i f t he DOC al l owed Kosi l ek t o have
sur ger y.
4. The Court-Appointed Expert
Af t er hear i ng al l t he wi t nesses each si de wi shed t o
pr esent , J udge Wol f deci ded t o appoi nt an exper t i n or der t o hel p
hi mdeci de whet her t he car e pr oposed by Dr . Schmi dt was obj ect i vel y
adequat e. See Fed. R. Evi d. 706 ( pr ovi di ng t hat t he cour t may on
i t s own i ni t i at i ve appoi nt an exper t ) . Af t er sol i ci t i ng t he
-43-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
44/118
par t i es' t hought s on who t o appoi nt , J udge Wol f sel ect ed St ephen
Levi ne, M. D. , on Oct ober 31, 2006. Dr . Levi ne pr act i ced at t he
Cent er f or Mar i t al and Sexual Heal t h i n Ohi o and was a cl i ni cal
pr of essor of psychi at r y at Case West er n Reserve Uni ver si t y School
of Medi ci ne. The cour t i nf or med Dr . Levi ne t hat Kosi l ek had been
l i vi ng as a woman i n pr i son and i nst r uct ed hi m t o t r eat t hi s case
as i f Kosi l ek wer e j ust anot her pat i ent out i n f r ee soci et y,
wi t hout al l t he i ssues at t endant t o her bei ng i ncar cer at ed.
A mont h l at er , Dr . Levi ne, who di d not i nt er vi ew Kosi l ek,
i ssued a wr i t t en r eport . Comment i ng on t he vi ews hel d by Dr s.
Br own and Schmi dt , he not ed t hey "r ef l ect t he cur r ent pol ar i t i es
wi t hi n psychi at r y" wi t h each of t hei r r espect i ve posi t i ons havi ng
mer i t . He wr ote t hat "Dr . Schmi dt ' s vi ew, however unpopul ar and
uncompass i onat e i n t he eyes of some exper t s i n GI D, i s wi t hi n
pr udent pr of essi onal communi t y st andar ds. "
I n addi t i on t o submi t t i ng hi s r epor t , Dr . Levi ne al so
t est i f i ed on December 19, 2006. At f i r st , he r ei t er at ed t hat t he
t r eat ment r ecommended by Dr . Schmi dt , t hough perhaps not popul ar ,
was wi t hi n pr udent prof essi onal st andar ds. He t hought Kosi l ek had
obt ai ned a good amount of r el i ef f r om bei ng on hormones and
dressi ng as a woman and was pr obabl y as f emi ni ne as she was goi ng
t o be; sur ger y woul d be " i ci ng on t he cake" he sai d. Dr . Levi ne,
l i ke Dr . Schmi dt , st opped shor t of sayi ng t hat Kosi l ek woul d t r y t o
ki l l her sel f i f she was deni ed sur ger y. He t hought i t was j ust a
-44-
-
8/13/2019 First Circuit upholds order requiring prison to offer sex change operation
45/118
possi bi l i t y and Kosi l ek' s i mpul se coul d per haps change over t i me.
And, he added, even i f Kosi l ek recei ved t he sur ger y, i t was
possi bl e t hat , havi ng not hi ng l ef t t o f i ght f or , she coul d st i l l
exper i ence an emot i onal cr i si s and cont empl at e sui ci de. I n
gener al , Dr . Levi ne had cr i t i ci sms of bot h Dr . Schmi dt ' s and Dr .
Br own' s r eport s, but he t hought t hey were both r easonabl e.
Dur i ng quest i oni ng by J udge Wol f , i t seemed Dr . Levi ne
had not f ol l owed some of t he cour t ' s di r ect i ves about not t aki ng
i nt o account t he f act t hat Kosi l ek was i n pr i son. Pr esumi ng
Kosi l ek woul d never be f r ee, Dr . Levi ne di d agr ee Kosi l ek had l i ved
a r eal - l i f e exper i ence as a woman i n pr i son. He al so bel i eved she
essent i al l y met al l t he el i gi bi l i t y and r eadi ness requi r ement s f or
surger y under t he St andar ds of Car e. Dr . Levi ne opi ned t hat
pr ovi di ng Kosi l ek wi t h sur ger y, assumi ng she had met t he r eal - l i f e
exper i ence r equi r ement , woul d be consi st ent wi t h pr udent
pr of essi onal pr act i ce. And al t hough Dr . Levi ne had ear l i er i n hi s
t est i mony f