first amendment

22
First Amendment Are you an absolutist or a relativist?

Upload: marty

Post on 24-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

First Amendment. Are you an absolutist or a relativist?. Nat Hentoff: Absolutist. Northeastern graduate. Nat Hentoff: Absolutist. Northeastern graduate Wrote liner notes for John Coltrane and Bob Dylan albums. Nat Hentoff: Absolutist. Northeastern graduate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: First Amendment

First Amendment

Are you an absolutistor a relativist?

Page 2: First Amendment

Nat Hentoff: Absolutist

• Northeastern graduate

Page 3: First Amendment

Nat Hentoff: Absolutist

• Northeastern graduate

• Wrote liner notes for John Coltrane andBob Dylan albums

Page 4: First Amendment

Nat Hentoff: Absolutist

• Northeastern graduate

• Wrote liner notes for John Coltrane andBob Dylan albums

• First Amendment views formed by getting kicked off the Northeastern News

Page 5: First Amendment

Robert Bork: Relativist

• Served Richard Nixon

Page 6: First Amendment

Robert Bork: Relativist

• Served Richard Nixon• Failed Supreme Court

nominee

Page 7: First Amendment

Robert Bork: Relativist

• Served Richard Nixon• Failed Supreme Court

nominee• Blames liberal judges

for protecting “vulgarity and obscenity”

Page 8: First Amendment

Understanding“make no law”

• Hentoff: Any restriction on speech, even libel law, violates the First Amendment

Page 9: First Amendment

Understanding“make no law”

• Hentoff: Any restriction on speech, even libel law, violates the First Amendment

• Bork: The First Amendment was meant to protect political speech, not indecency and violence

Page 10: First Amendment

Understanding“make no law”

• Hentoff: Any restriction on speech, even libel law, violates the First Amendment

• Bork: The First Amendment was meant to protect political speech, not indecency and violence

Page 11: First Amendment

Hentoff on obscenity

• Founders were unconcerned

Page 12: First Amendment

Hentoff on obscenity

• Founders were unconcerned

• Supreme Court didn’t mention until 1957

Page 13: First Amendment

Hentoff on obscenity

• Founders were unconcerned

• Supreme Court didn’t mention until 1957

• Brennan (right), in Roth, introduced social value

Page 14: First Amendment

Lenny Bruce

• A satirist with a dirty mouth

Page 15: First Amendment

Lenny Bruce

• A satirist with a dirty mouth

• How do you define social value?

Page 16: First Amendment

Lenny Bruce

• A satirist with a dirty mouth

• How do you define social value?

• Won on appeal,but it was too late

Page 17: First Amendment

Bork on obscenity

• Criticizes Snoop Dogg, Nine Inch Nails

Page 18: First Amendment

Bork on obscenity

• Criticizes Snoop Dogg, Nine Inch Nails

• Driven by aesthetic as well as legal judgments

Page 19: First Amendment

Bork on obscenity

• Criticizes Snoop Dogg, Nine Inch Nails

• Driven by aesthetic as well as legal judgments

• Hentoff may be wrong — Chaplinsky,Near v. Minnesota

Page 20: First Amendment

Hentoff versus Bork

• Protection of political ideas versus threat of censorship

Page 21: First Amendment

Hentoff versus Bork

• Protection of political ideas versus threat of censorship

• A loophole for censors versus a loophole for pornographers

Page 22: First Amendment

Hentoff versus Bork

• Protection of political ideas versus threat of censorship

• A loophole for censors versus a loophole for pornographers

• Minority rights versus majority rule