finite n index and angular momentum bound from gravity

18
Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity “KEK Theory Workshop 2007” Yu Nakayama, 13 th . Mar. 2007. (University of Tokyo) Based on hep-th/0701208

Upload: arch

Post on 01-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity. “KEK Theory Workshop 2007” Yu Nakayama , 13 th . Mar. 2007. (University of Tokyo) Based on hep-th/0701208. 0. Introduction. Classification of (S)CFT 2 dimension CFT (BPZ…) Central charge Character 2 Dimension SCFT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

“KEK Theory Workshop 2007”

Yu Nakayama, 13th. Mar. 2007.

(University of Tokyo)

Based on hep-th/0701208

Page 2: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

0. Introduction Classification of (S)CFT

2 dimension CFT (BPZ…) Central charge Character

2 Dimension SCFT Witten index Elliptic genus

Witten index Central charge (a-theorem, a-maximization) Character? Index for 4-dimensional SCFT Geometrical classification via AdS-CFT?

Similar classification exists for 4-dimensional SCFT?

Page 3: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Witten index for supersymmetric field theory

Witten Index on R4 (or T3 ×R) captures vacuum structure of the supersymmetric (field) theories

Bose-Fermi cancellation Only vacuum (H=0) states contribute Does not depend on

Many applications Study on vacuum structure Implication for SUSY breaking Derivation of index theorem (geometry)

Page 4: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

The index for 4d SCFT

Consider SCFT on S3 × R. The index (Romelsberger, Kin

ney et al) can be defined by a similar manner.

Properties Only short multiplets (Δ=0) states contribute Does not depend on β No dep on continuous deformation of SCFT The index is unique (KMMR) Captures a lot more information of SCFT!

Page 5: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

AdS-CFT @ Finite N

Index can be studied in the strongly coupled regime

AdS/CFT duality Large N limit SUGRA approximation

Excellent agreement N=4 SYM (KMMR) Orbifolds and conifold (Nakayama)

Finite N case? 1/N ~ gs

Quantized string coupling? What is the fundamental degrees of freedom?

Index does not depend on the coupling constant

Page 6: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Finite N Index and Angular Momentum BoundFinite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Yu Nakayama

Page 7: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Index for N=4 SYM (gYM = 0)

Only states with will contribute.

Page 8: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Contribution to Index

Chiral LH multiplets and LH semi-long multiplets contribute to the Index

Chiral LH multiplet

LH semi-long multiplet

Page 9: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Computation of index from matrix model (AMMPR)

Strategy to determine Seff

Count Δ=0 single letter states Integrate over U Or direct path integral

Path integral on S3 ×R reduces to a matrix integral over the holonomy (Polyakov loop)

Page 10: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Large N Limit vs Finite N

Introduce eigenvalue density evaluate saddle point Saddle point is trivial leading contribution is just

Gaussian fluctuation

Finite N seems difficult. Even for SU(2), we have to evaluate

Explicit integration is possible in the large N limit

Page 11: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Maximal Angular Momentum Limit

We take Only states with will contribute.

Why do we call maximal angular momentum limit? The limit prevents us from taking too large j1 with fixed

j2.

Not protected by any BPS algebra!!

We propose a new limit, where the matrix integral is feasible

Page 12: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Index in maximal angular momentum limit

For SU(2), we have

Similarly, they are trivial for SU(N). Agrees with gravity (large N limit). No finite N corrections

Index is trivial nontrivially! No finite N corrections!

Page 13: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Partition function

For SU(2)

For SU(3)

For SU(∞)

Partition function does have finite N corrections in the maximal angular momentum limit

Does not agree with gravity computation

Partition function is nontrivial with finite N corrections

Page 14: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Maximal Angular Momentum Limit from GravityFinite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Yu Nakayama

Page 15: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Physical meaning of angular momentum bound?

No consistent interacting theory with (finitely many) massless particles spin > 2. Gives the maximal angular momentum bound for dua

l CFTs.

Highest weight state should satisfy j1 1, j≦ 2 1.≦ Only decoupled free DOF contributes to the index in t

his limit. Any CFTs with dual gravity description (e.g. any Sasa

ki-Einstein) should satisfy this bound. Again there is no general proof from field theoy. Nontr

ivial bound!

SUGRA admits only massless particle spin up to 2!

Page 16: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Contribution from BH?

Asymptotically AdS (extremal = BPS) Black holes have charge

They do not satisfy maximal angular momentum bound.

consistent with our results They are not exhaustive?

In high energy regime, black holes may contribute to the index

Page 17: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Summary and Outlook

Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Yu Nakayama

Page 18: Finite N Index and Angular Momentum Bound from Gravity

Summary and Outlook Counting states (index) for finite N gauge

theory is of great significance.Basic building blocks for nonperturbative string

theoryNature of quantum gravity

Difficult problem in general. Maximal Angular Momentum Limit was

proposed. No finite N corrections for index in this limit. Finite N corrections for full index?