finite element modeling of seismic performance of low concrete

34
Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete Strength Exterior Beam-Column Joints D.Ahmed * , M.K. Rahman * , A.Ilki ** and M.H. Baluch * *King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia ** Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

Upload: ngoanh

Post on 19-Dec-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

Finite Element Modeling of SeismicPerformance of Low Concrete StrengthExterior Beam-Column Joints

D.Ahmed*, M.K. Rahman*, A.Ilki** and M.H. Baluch*

*King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia

** Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

Page 2: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

• Introduction•Beam-Column Joint Test at ITU•Finite element modeling using DIANA•Results of Finite Element Analysis•Conclusions•Ongoing work at KFUPM

• Introduction•Beam-Column Joint Test at ITU•Finite element modeling using DIANA•Results of Finite Element Analysis•Conclusions•Ongoing work at KFUPM

Page 3: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

JOINT FAILURE IN BUILDINGS

Page 4: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

BACKGROUND• The Western Region of Saudi Arabia is located in

moderately active seismic zone with recent/historicalseismic events. Many RC buildings in this region werehitherto designed only for gravity loads using lowstrength concrete without any ductile detailing ofbeam-column joints [Alsayed et al]

• An experimental program was conducted at IstanbulTechnical University (ITU) on the behavior of exteriorbeam-column joints subjected to seismic loads. Thesejoints were made with very low strength concrete tosimulate the concrete used in reinforced concretestructures in Turkey prior to 1990’s. [Bedirhanoglu etal, A.Ilki et al]

• The Western Region of Saudi Arabia is located inmoderately active seismic zone with recent/historicalseismic events. Many RC buildings in this region werehitherto designed only for gravity loads using lowstrength concrete without any ductile detailing ofbeam-column joints [Alsayed et al]

• An experimental program was conducted at IstanbulTechnical University (ITU) on the behavior of exteriorbeam-column joints subjected to seismic loads. Thesejoints were made with very low strength concrete tosimulate the concrete used in reinforced concretestructures in Turkey prior to 1990’s. [Bedirhanoglu etal, A.Ilki et al]

Page 5: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

PRE-1990’S DETAILING OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS

Page 6: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

BEAM-COLUMN JOINT TEST AT ITU

Page 7: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

GEOMETRY AND REINFORCEMENTDETAILS OF ITU SPECIMEN

Page 8: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

GEOMETRY AND REINFORCEMENTDETAILS OF ITU SPECIMEN

Page 9: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

MATERIAL PROPERTIES

Mechanical properties of reinforcing bars:

Reinforcement

Dia(mm) Fy (Mpa) εy Fs max

(Mpa)

εsmax

Φ16 16 333 0.0017 470 0.2Φ8 8 315 0.0016 433 0.2Φ8 8 315 0.0016 433 0.2

Material properties of concrete:

f’c (Mpa) Ec (Mpa)

8.3 13000

f’c: low strength concrete

Page 10: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

SPECIMEN TESTED AT ITU

• Test specimens selected for F.E modeling areJW1 and JW2 which are with welded hooksand repaired joints with high strength mortar.

Page 11: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

TEST SETUP

Page 12: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

TEST RESULTS FOR JOINT JW2

Page 13: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

ENVELOPE FOR HYSTERESIS

Page 14: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT DIAGRAMFOR JW2

50

60

70

80

90

100LOAD(KN)

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 10 20 30 40 50

LOAD(KN)

DISPLACEMENT(mm)

JW2

Page 15: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

JOINT FAILURE FOR JW2

Page 16: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING

• The commercial F.E software DIANA is usedwhich is well known for modeling concretestructures due to its wide range of concretematerial models and advanced numericaltools.

• The non-linear mechanisms that areconsidered in the modeling are cracking andcrushing of concrete and yielding ofreinforcement.

• The finite element model is two dimensionalconsisting of plane stress elements.

• The commercial F.E software DIANA is usedwhich is well known for modeling concretestructures due to its wide range of concretematerial models and advanced numericaltools.

• The non-linear mechanisms that areconsidered in the modeling are cracking andcrushing of concrete and yielding ofreinforcement.

• The finite element model is two dimensionalconsisting of plane stress elements.

Page 17: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

MATERIAL CONSTITUTIVE MODELS

• Concrete Plasticity :

• Concrete is modeled as elastic perfectlyplastic.

• Drucker-Prager yield criterion is used tomodel the stress level at which yieldingof concrete is initiated.

• The yield surface of Drucker-Pragermodel is a circular cone which can berelated to Mohr-Coulomb by expressingα and k in terms of c and φ.

• In Drucker-Prager plasticity model,associated plasticity is established bysetting φ = ψ.

• Concrete Plasticity :

• Concrete is modeled as elastic perfectlyplastic.

• Drucker-Prager yield criterion is used tomodel the stress level at which yieldingof concrete is initiated.

• The yield surface of Drucker-Pragermodel is a circular cone which can berelated to Mohr-Coulomb by expressingα and k in terms of c and φ.

• In Drucker-Prager plasticity model,associated plasticity is established bysetting φ = ψ.

Page 18: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

MATERIAL CONSTITUTIVE MODELS

• The cohesion is related to theconcrete strength through therelation given by

• For the normal strength qualityconcrete, the ratio between thebiaxial compressive strength anduniaxial compressive strength isapproximately 1:1.16 whichresults in a friction angleφ=10deg and cohesion c=0.42f’c

• The cohesion is related to theconcrete strength through therelation given by

• For the normal strength qualityconcrete, the ratio between thebiaxial compressive strength anduniaxial compressive strength isapproximately 1:1.16 whichresults in a friction angleφ=10deg and cohesion c=0.42f’c

Page 19: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

MATERIAL CONSTITUTIVE MODELS• Concrete cracking:

The cracking of theconcrete is specified as acombination of constanttension cut-off, lineartension softening and shearretention.

• Reinforcement:

For reinforcement Von-Mises-Plasticity with workhardening is used.

• Concrete cracking:

The cracking of theconcrete is specified as acombination of constanttension cut-off, lineartension softening and shearretention.

• Reinforcement:

For reinforcement Von-Mises-Plasticity with workhardening is used.

Page 20: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

2-D MODEL WITH REINFORCEMENT

Page 21: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ANDLOADING DETAILS

• Top end of the columnsurface is constrained in Xand Y direction

• Bottom end of the columnis constrained in X axis andfree in Y direction due toupward axial pressure(0.125*f’c).

• Near the tip of beam pointis constrained in y directionbecause loading method isdisplacement controlwhich is 50mm

• Top end of the columnsurface is constrained in Xand Y direction

• Bottom end of the columnis constrained in X axis andfree in Y direction due toupward axial pressure(0.125*f’c).

• Near the tip of beam pointis constrained in y directionbecause loading method isdisplacement controlwhich is 50mm

Page 22: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ANDLOADING DETAILS

Page 23: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

FINITE ELEMENT MESH

• The concrete is modeled byeight-noded quadrilateralisoparametric plane stresselement CQ16M.

• The mesh size of concreteelement is 50x50 (mm).

• Reinforcements are modeledas embedded reinforcement.

• The concrete is modeled byeight-noded quadrilateralisoparametric plane stresselement CQ16M.

• The mesh size of concreteelement is 50x50 (mm).

• Reinforcements are modeledas embedded reinforcement.

Page 24: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

MESH WITH REINFORCEMENT

Page 25: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

DIANA ANALYSIS

• DIANA needs two files to start the analysis

1. (.dat) file which contains material properties for concreteft=0.73Mpa at 28 days, c=2.15Mpa (calibrated to matchexperimental data), φ = ψ=10deg, beta=0.9 (smaller valueslead to premature curtailment of P-∆ curve), E=12000Mpaand steel (hardening diagram and modulus of elasticity) ,Nodal coordinates , Reinforcement coordinates, Boundaryconditions and Load cases.

2. (.com) file where we define the iteration method, step size(load step 0.050mm) and convergence criteria for analysis.

• DIANA needs two files to start the analysis

1. (.dat) file which contains material properties for concreteft=0.73Mpa at 28 days, c=2.15Mpa (calibrated to matchexperimental data), φ = ψ=10deg, beta=0.9 (smaller valueslead to premature curtailment of P-∆ curve), E=12000Mpaand steel (hardening diagram and modulus of elasticity) ,Nodal coordinates , Reinforcement coordinates, Boundaryconditions and Load cases.

2. (.com) file where we define the iteration method, step size(load step 0.050mm) and convergence criteria for analysis.

Page 26: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSISRESULTS

Page 27: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT DIAGRAMFOR JW2 AND DIANA MODEL

50

60

70

80

90

100

LOAD(KN)

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 20 40 60

LOAD(KN)

DISPLACEMENT(mm)

experiment

DIANA model

Page 28: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

STRESS IN STEEL SXX (BEAM)

Page 29: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

STRESSES IN CONCRETE SYY (COLUMN)

Page 30: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

STRESSES IN CONCRETE SXY

Page 31: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

CRACK PATTERNS

Page 32: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

CONCLUSIONS• The finite element simulation of the represented by the load-

deflection shows good agreement with the test data whichindicates that DIANA software with its 2-D plane stress model isable to capture the behavior of beam-column joint well.

• The crack patterns at various loads from the FE model correspondwell with the experimentally observed failure modes, stresses inthe beam, column and joints are in agreement.

• The finite element simulation of the represented by the load-deflection shows good agreement with the test data whichindicates that DIANA software with its 2-D plane stress model isable to capture the behavior of beam-column joint well.

• The crack patterns at various loads from the FE model correspondwell with the experimentally observed failure modes, stresses inthe beam, column and joints are in agreement.

Page 33: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

WORK IN PROGRESS AT KFUPM

• In a collaborative program presently underwaybetween Istanbul Technical university (ITU) andKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals(KFUPM) an experimental program is beingconducted at KFUPM on the beam-column jointsused in old reinforced concrete buildings in SaudiArabia.

• Finite element simulation has been done for thestatic load test to capture the nonlinear behaviorof the joint.

• In a collaborative program presently underwaybetween Istanbul Technical university (ITU) andKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals(KFUPM) an experimental program is beingconducted at KFUPM on the beam-column jointsused in old reinforced concrete buildings in SaudiArabia.

• Finite element simulation has been done for thestatic load test to capture the nonlinear behaviorof the joint.

Page 34: Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Performance of Low Concrete

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT KFUPM

• The study is being funded by King FahdUniversity of Petroleum & Minerals underproject number RG1111-1 & RG1111-2 which isgratefully acknowledged.

• The authors acknowledge the mentoringprovided by ITU to the KFUPM graduatestudents involved in this project.

• The study is being funded by King FahdUniversity of Petroleum & Minerals underproject number RG1111-1 & RG1111-2 which isgratefully acknowledged.

• The authors acknowledge the mentoringprovided by ITU to the KFUPM graduatestudents involved in this project.