final summative paper for edef 607

Upload: kiwikrs

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    1/6

    Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    By Karen Soper

    It is the duty of a public educational system to prepare our students for life, when they graduate.If

    I had a magic wand, I would create an educational system that would prepare youth to function as

    good citizens; citizens that understand their world and who contribute positively to society. These

    are the important skills that need to be taught in school.

    y Social skills cooperative learning, citizenship. I would incorporate aspects of Shapirospeace education by teaching compassion, kindness, understanding and acceptance of

    those who are different (Shapiro, 2006).

    y Basics of mathematics adding, subtracting, multiplication, division, fractions, decimals,measurement and simple algebra. Leaving the higher level math skills for those who are

    proficient at math and desire to learn more.

    y Reading and writing reading and comprehension skills, writing skills, so they cancommunicate effectively and understand the communications of others. Literature should

    be used to teach these skills, so they can be exposed to good models.

    y History First national and then world history. It should be taught in such a way wherethey see patterns in history, so they can learn from mistakes of the past and to

    understand why things are the way they are today. Not taught as a mere memorization of

    dates and events.

    y Science Interactive and hands-on, so it has meaning.y Art and Music to develop the creative side and to encourage appreciation.

  • 8/6/2019 Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    2/6

    y Physical and Health daily physical activity and care of self. Respect of themselves andhuman life.

    y Domestic skills - such as budgeting a household, care of babies and children, cooking,minor household repairs, minor vehicle repairs, awareness of career choices and how

    they affect your lifestyle.

    y Foreign languages Latin root words in elementary and middle school should be taughtso students can more easily determine the meaning of words they are unfamiliar with.

    Spanish in high school for all students as it is a prevalent language in theAmericas.

    It is just as important how these things will be taught. In my educational system, the students would

    be highly engaged in their learning. Most of the learning would be done in groups and discussions.

    The teacher would be more of a facilitator than a dictator. The students would be given real life

    problems to solve. They would utilize the skills being taught to solve these problems. This type of

    learning encourages students to be critical thinkers, to learn group skills, to teach each other and see

    relevance to their world. While it takes a creative teacher who can take the educational standards

    that need to be taught in a certain grade level and find their relevance in a problem that the students

    can solve. But once the teacher has figured this out, he or she merely guides the students in their

    groups to a resolution. This style of learning is superior to rote learning. It gives the students skills

    that they can carry with them into their adult world. They will have the tools they need to solve

    problems and to work together with others for a common goal.

    This type of teaching makes standardized testing as a form of accountability more difficult, but not

    impossible. There are certain skills that can be assessed and should be assessed. I would propose an

    accountability system like Rothstein suggests:

  • 8/6/2019 Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    3/6

    Representative student samples should be assessed at the state level and on a regular

    schedule, not only in math and reading but in other academic areas science, history, other

    social studies, writing, foreign language as well as in the arts, citizenship, social skills and

    health behavior. As in early NAEP these assessments should include paper-and pencil test

    items, surveys and performance observations. (Rothstein, 2008, p. 148)

    However, I would not assess quite as many different areas. I would only assess math, reading,

    writing, science, social studies, citizenship and health. Mostly due to the complexity of developing so

    many tests and the amount of time it would take for students to take all those tests. Some of the

    categories he suggests can be included in one of the tests above. For example, social skills can be

    assessed as part of citizenship. This type of assessment would require an expansion of the present

    day National Assessment of Educational Process (NAEP), which would be federally funded.

    I also agree with Rothstein that NAEP scores should be scaled and not leveled by achievement. It

    makes it easier to compare quartiles with other states (Rothstein, 2008). Testing by age, rather than

    by grade, allows states to see if there starting age policies are working. I would follow early NAEP

    surveying of students after they have left the school system. I would however, suggest sampling 21

    year olds rather than 17 year olds. Many 17 year olds are still in high school and at 21 they are either

    graduating from college or are close to it or they are working or attending some type of continuing

    education. I believe you would get a better idea of how well they were prepared for college or for

    getting into the work force. All of the assessments would be samplings determined by the state on a

    random basis. The samplings should not be left to the schools, for obvious reasons. This type of

    accountability would end the teaching to the test syndrome as the data would be used to improve

    the schools not to punish. It would bring to light areas of weakness and strength in each states

    systems.

    NAEP would oversee the test development and administration.However, the data would be given

    back to the states to analyze and control the recommendations for improvements.As Rothstein

    states, U.S. Congress and Department of Education are too distant to micromanage school

  • 8/6/2019 Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    4/6

    performance (Rothstein, 2008).Local school boards, their superintendents and principals should get

    together to analyze the data from the testing and to come up with a plan for improvements in areas

    where they are weak. Each states governor would require an improvement plan to be submitted to

    the governor or a governor assigned task force to hold each school system accountable for having a

    plan for improvement in areas of weakness. Each state should have its own inspection agency that

    comes in and evaluates each school to make sure they are safe, appropriately staffed, and are

    making the improvements in their improvement plan that they submitted to the governor. The teams

    of people from this agency need to be professionals who are trained in what to look for. They should

    have access to all classrooms and arrive with little to no advance notice. They should make clear

    recommendations on how each school should reform and schools that repeatedly fail in their reports

    over a period of three years, the administration and faculty should be replaced (Rothstein, 2008).

    I would do away with tenure for teachers. Administrators need to be able to get rid of bad teachers.

    There should be a clear process for getting rid of these teachers, but it needs to be a swift process, so

    that an entire class doesnt have to suffer through an entire year of a bad teacher. This process

    would include many observations and suggestions for improvement. If within 30 days, the teacher

    does not make the majority of the improvements, they are out. There is no reason for tenure other

    than to please the unions. I do not believe in performance based pay. All teachers should exhibit high

    performance, as with any job. Unlike the Israel studies referenced by Lavy, recentRand studies show

    that performance based pay does not have any real effect on student achievement scores in the

    United States (Lavy, 2007; Rand, 2011).

    Funding my education system would be multi-faceted. Federal money would cover all NAEP required

    testing expenses, but would not fund the schools directly. Each state would be responsible for

    funding its own schools. This is a radical idea, I know, but I think it could work. There would be a big

  • 8/6/2019 Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    5/6

    federal tax cut for individuals followed by a big state tax increase for education. The state tax

    increase would come from income tax withholdings as well as property taxes, sales taxes, lottery

    systems and corporation contributions. There would be some federal oversight to make sure that all

    states are appropriating a minimum amount to their schools. This would be based on the states

    population numbers, number of schools, and socio-economic make up. If a state is unable to meet

    the minimum standard, due to a high percentage of low income individuals in the state, the federal

    government would supplement to bring them up to the minimum standard. State who have the

    ability to meet the standard and greatly exceed it, would have to pay the federal government a

    certain percentage of the amount by which they exceed the minimum standard. This money will be

    used to help the states with the low income issues. This way all states will at least meet a minimum

    standard of funding for their schools. From there each state will do the same within their own state.

    There will be a minimum set for each district. Those districts who more than meet the standard,

    would donate a percentage to the districts that cannot meet the minimum standard. All state

    corporations of a certain size, based on revenues earned, would be required to donate funds or the

    equivalent in products to the schools. These funds and products would be string free within the walls

    of the schools. No advertising in the walls of the schools may take place. However they are free to

    advertise on school newsletters home, yearbooks, sporting events, school websites, etc. Lotteries

    would be required to donate all funds to education alone. With similar standards for all states and all

    districts within a state, education would be more equalized. Each state would mostly be funding its

    own state.

    I have created a public school system that will educate all students to be good citizens, critical

    thinkers, possess skills to go on to college or follow a career of their choice, understand the world in

    which they live, and be able to contribute positively to society. The schools systems will be equitable

    regardless of the population. Each school will be held accountable both on a federal and state level.

  • 8/6/2019 Final Summative Paper for EDEF 607

    6/6

    Reference List

    Shapiro, H. S. (2006). Losing heart: The moral and spiritual miseducation of Americas children. New

    York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Rothstein, R. (2008). Grading education: Getting accountability right. Washington D.C. and New York:

    Economic Policy Institute and Teachers College Press.

    Lavy, V. (2007). Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. The Future of

    Children, 17(1), 87-109.

    Rand Corporation. (2011, July 18). New York City school-based financial incentive program did not

    improve student achievement or affect reported teaching practices. Retrieved July 21, 2011

    from http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/0718.html