figures from chapter 3 - duck and goose distinctionsetheses.whiterose.ac.uk/21445/4/4. appendix 3 -...
TRANSCRIPT
324
Appendix 3~
Figures from Chapter 3 - Duck and goose distinctions
All measurements are in millimetres unless stated
Coracoid
Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3 Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5 Figure 3.6
325
Scapula
Humerus
Figure 3.7 Figure 3.8
Figure 3.9 Figure 3.10
Figure 3.11 Figure 3.12
326
Humerus
Figure 3.15
Figure 3.13 Figure 3.14
Figure 3.16
Figure 3.17 Figure 3.18
327
Figure 3.19 Figure 3.20
Figure 3.21 Figure 3.22
Figure 3.23 Figure 3.24
328
Ulna
Figure 3.25
Figure 3.26 Figure 3.27
329
Radius
Carpometacarpus
Figure 3.29 Figure 3.28
Figure 3.30 Figure 3.31
Figure 3.32 Figure 3.33
330
Figure 3.34 Figure 3.35
Figure 3.36 Figure 3.37
Figure 3.38
331
Carpometacarpus classification results summary
Original group Predicted Group Membership
Total
Duck Goose
Count Duck 368 4 372
Goose 5 144 149
% Duck 98.9 1.1 100
Goose 3.4 96.6 100
98.3% of original grouped cases correctly classified.
Measurements Cmcgl
Cmcbp
Cmcdp
Cmchp
Cmcli
Cmcdi1
Cmcbfi
Cmclfi
Cmcdid
Box’s M sig. 0.000
Wilks’ Lambda
sig.
0.000
Function 1
% of Variance
100.0
Figure 3.39
332
Femur
Figure 3.40 Figure 3.41
Figure 3.42 Figure 3.43
Figure 3.44 Figure 3.45
333
Femur classification results summary
Original group Predicted Group Membership
Total
Duck Goose
Count Duck 433 6 439
Goose 18 126 144
% Duck 98.6 1.4 100.0
Goose 12.5 87.5 100.0
95.9% of original grouped cases correctly classified.
Measurements Femurgl
Femurlm
Femursc
Femurbp
Femurdp
Femurdcap
Femurbd
Femurdd
Femurdfib
Femurdmed
Box’s M sig. 0.000
Wilks’
Lambda sig.
0.000
Function 1
% of Variance
100.0
Figure 3.46
Figure 3.47
334
Tibiotarsus
Figure 3.48 Figure 3.49
Figure 3.50 Figure 3.51
Figure 3.52 Figure 3.53
335
Tibiotarsus classification results summary
Original group Predicted Group Membership
Total
Duck Goose
Count Duck 384 10 394
Goose 1 119 120
% Duck 97.5 2.5 100.0
Goose 0.8 99.2 100.0
97.9% of original grouped cases correctly classified.
Measurements Tbtgl
Tbtla
Tbtsc
Tbtdip
Tbtbpcn
Tbtlcf
Tbtlpcf
Tbtbd
Tbtdd
Box’s M sig. 0.000
Wilks’ Lambda
sig.
0.000
Function 1
% of Variance
100.0
Figure 3.54
336
Tarsometatarsus
Figure 3.55 Figure 3.56
Figure 3.57 Figure 3.58
Figure 3.59 Figure 3.60
337
+
Measurements Tmtgl
Tmtlm
Tmtsc
Tmtbp
Tmtlhyp1
Tmtlhyp2
Tmtbd
Tmtbd34
Box’s M sig. 0.000
Wilks’ Lambda
sig.
0.000
Function 1
% of Variance
100.0
Tarsometatarsus classification results summary
Original group Predicted Group Membership
Total
Duck Goose
Count Duck 435 7 442
Goose 0 116 116
% Duck 98.4 1.6 100.0
Goose 0.0 100.0 100.0
98.7% of original grouped cases correctly classified.
Figure 3.61 Figure 3.62
Figure 3.63