figure 1: task 2 predictions as a function of proxy’s task 1 performance inferior proxy similar...

5
Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to Proxy (Worse than Proxy) (Better than Proxy) F(2,114) = 46.75, p < .001

Post on 21-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to

Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

InferiorProxy

SimilarProxy

SuperiorProxy

Pre

dict

ed P

erfo

rman

ce R

elat

ive

to P

roxy

(Wor

se th

an P

roxy

)(B

ette

r th

an P

roxy

)

F(2,114) = 46.75, p < .001

Page 2: Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to

Figure 2: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Related Attributes

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

InferiorProxy

SimilarProxy

SuperiorProxy

ProxywithoutRelated

Attributes

Pre

dict

ed P

erfo

rman

ce R

elat

ive

to P

roxy

(Wor

se th

an P

roxy

)(B

ette

r th

an P

roxy

)

F(3,149) = 11.49, p < .001

Page 3: Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to

Figure 3: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Related Attributes & Effort

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

Effort Ambiguous Effort Maximum

InferiorProxy

Similar & No RAProxy

SuperiorProxy

Pre

dict

ed P

erfo

rman

ce R

elat

ive

to P

roxy

(Wor

se th

an P

roxy

)(B

ette

r th

an P

roxy

)

F(2,104) = 3.15, p < .05

Page 4: Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to

Figure 4: Comparison Selections for Preference vs. Belief Assessment

2

3

4

5

6

Similar Dissimilar MoreExpertise

LessExpertise

PreferenceBelief

Note: Ratings were made on 7-point scales ranging from 1 (no interest) to 7 (very interested).

Page 5: Figure 1: Task 2 Predictions as a Function of Proxy’s Task 1 Performance Inferior Proxy Similar Proxy Superior Proxy Predicted Performance Relative to

Figure 5: Predicted Reaction to New Stimulus as a Function of the Proxy’s Past Preference Pattern and Reaction to New Stimulus

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Similar Dissimilar Inconsistent

Proxy liked movieProxy disliked movie

Note: Ratings were made on 11-point scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 11 (enjoyed film very much).