fidm’s program review: steps toward internal and external transparency
DESCRIPTION
APRIL 2014. FIDM’s program review: steps toward internal and external transparency. Presented by Andrea Helekar & Veronica Gonzalez. Know Thyself!. Well-known quotation by Socrates. Program Review: A voyage of discovery, self-knowledge, and growth. Smart Design. •. •. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
FIDM’s program review:steps toward internal and
external transparency
APRIL 2014
Presented by Andrea Helekar & Veronica
Gonzalez
Know Thyself!
Well-known quotation by Socrates. Program Review: A voyage of discovery, self-knowledge, and growth. Smart Design.
APRIL 2014
•
•
Program Review Timeline
Milestones Dates
Comprehensive Program Review was initiated for all Academic Programs.
April 2009 - October 2009
Comprehensive Program Review was expanded to Student Services.
April 2010 – October 2010
Comprehensive Program Review was expanded to Operational Services.
April 2011 – October 2011
Institution-wide evaluation of Program Review was initiated.
January 2013 – March 2013
APRIL 2014
Methodology
Four Populations and Research Instruments
Interviews with Administrators.Focus groups with Academic Chairs and Student Services Managers.Faculty surveys.Archived IPEDS and Student Campus Climate Survey Data.
APRIL 2014
••
••
Questions
Question 1: Has Program Review had any impact on the college’s culture?
If so, in what areas?Question 2: Has Program Review has any impact on the colleges processes and procedures.
If so, in what areas?Question 3: In your opinion have these changes been beneficial or detrimental?APRIL 2014
•
•
Answers
Yes! Yes! Beneficial!Program Review has been transformational across the institution.High level of agreement across the various populations… but we like to let our students speak for us.
APRIL 2014
••
•
Five Years of Longitudinal Data: Student Satisfaction
Overall, my classes have challenged me.
APRIL 2014
2008 2009 2010 2011 20123.44
3.45
3.46
3.47
3.48
3.49
3.5
3.51
3.52
3.53
3.54
3.47
3.5 3.513.52
3.53
Avera
ge R
ati
ngs
Year
Five Years of Longitudinal Data: Student Satisfaction
My FIDM experience has met my expectations
APRIL 2014
2008 2009 2010 2011 20123.1
3.15
3.2
3.25
3.3
3.35
3.4
3.45
3.5
3.24
3.34 3.36
3.443.45
Avera
ge R
ati
ngs
Year
Five Years of Retention Data
APRIL 2014
Post-Program Review Retention
Pre-Program Review Retention
2008 2009 2010 2011 201266%
68%
70%
72%
74%
76%
78%
70%
71%
73%74%
76%
Rete
nti
on R
ate
Pe
rcen
tage
Year
Five Years of Graduation Data
APRIL 2014
Pre-Program Review Graduation Rates
Post-Program Review Graduation Rates
2008 2009 2010 2011 201254%
55%
56%
57%
58%
59%
60%
56%
58% 59%59%
59%
Gra
duati
on
Rate
Pe
rcen
tage
Year
Other Findings
All populations agreed that Program Review has been transformational and generally beneficial
Curricular developmentFaculty rolesEmployee empowermentAcademic freedomEmployee involvement in decision-making
APRIL 2014
•••••
Surprises!
An unexpected result (not listed on any of the assessment instruments) but appeared in the data from all groups … COMMUNICATION
TRANSPARENCY
APRIL 2014
•
•
Closing the Loop: Using the Results
Closing the LoopAdopted a six year cycle for comprehensive program reviewDesigned and implemented an annual summary report for use in the years a comprehensive review is NOT requiredRedesigned the program review workbook to eliminate redundancy
APRIL 2014
•
•
•
Snap Review
Answer the following question…
Reflect upon program review in your institution, what is the single most important benefit?
APRIL 2014
•
Snap Review
Now let’s share !
APRIL 2014
•
Just for Fun
Complete the following task…
Select appropriate words for the acronym PR other than• Program Review• Public Relations • (examples: Pertinent Results, Purely
Reflective, Practical Recommendations, etc.)
APRIL 2014
•
Just for Fun
What’s your answer?
APRIL 2014
•
Questions?
APRIL 2014