fernando raffan , xi ding, stanislav stoliarov university of maryland, college park

42
Flaming Combustion Calorimetry: A New Tool for Flammability Assessment of Mg-scale Pyrolyzable Solid Samples Fernando Raffan, Xi Ding, Stanislav Stoliarov University of Maryland, College Park Roland Kraemer BASF

Upload: hubert

Post on 24-Feb-2016

73 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Flaming Combustion Calorimetry : A New Tool for Flammability Assessment of Mg-scale Pyrolyzable Solid Samples. Fernando Raffan , Xi Ding, Stanislav Stoliarov University of Maryland, College Park Roland Kraemer BASF. Brominated Flame Retardants. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Flaming Combustion Calorimetry: A New Tool for Flammability Assessment of Mg-scale Pyrolyzable Solid Samples

Flaming Combustion Calorimetry: A New Tool for Flammability Assessment of Mg-scale Pyrolyzable Solid SamplesFernando Raffan, Xi Ding, Stanislav StoliarovUniversity of Maryland, College Park

Roland Kraemer BASFBrominated Flame RetardantsBrominated flame retardants (BFRs) are widespread in their use due to their relative low cost/high performanceRecently, BFRs have been found to accumulate in human tissues and persist in the environment1,2. Industry is moving towards suitable replacementsUnderstanding mechanisms of BFRs as gas phase combustion inhibitors can guide the research community towards a suitable replacementA small scale screening tool for BFR replacements is highly desirable as it will considerably drive down costs during product development

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 2IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

1. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pbde.html2. http://www.nist.gov/el/fire_research/upload/1-Axelrad.pdf

Current Test MethodsCone CalorimetryCommonly used in fire testingLaminar-Transitional Diffusion flamesControlled incident heat fluxRequires samples on the order of grams (expensive for new materials)Micro Combustion Calorimetry (MCC)Laminar premixed reactor (no flame, complete combustion by design)Controlled pyrolysis (constant heating rate)Milligram sized samples12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 3

Design and implement an apparatus that can study the flaming combustion of milligram scale solid samples in a well-controlled fashionCorrelate the measured gas-phase combustion efficiency with MCC and cone calorimetry resultsDevelop steps towards measurement of flame temperatures in polymers with/without flame retardantsThe FCCFlaming Combustion Calorimeter

Objective of Current Work12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 4Design and Capabilities

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 5IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Pyrolyzer6Purge gasCDS 5000Pyro-probe

Quartz tube12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference

Sample tubeBase12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 7

Insert coflow and igniter hardwareHomogenize coflowSeal assembly

Combustion Chamber12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 8Enclose combustion processProvide optical access to the flame for gaining information like flame height, flame structure, combustion timeGas Analyzing System12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 9

DrieriteFlow meterO2 sensorHoodPressure gaugeSoot filter

CapabilitiesCo-flow0 - 6.32 SLPMO2 % in co-flow0-100%Purge gas0-100 SCCMHeating rate0-32 K/s12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 10IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

DiagnosticsO2 consumption calorimetryHeat Release RateCombustion EfficiencySoot Yield2 color ratio pyrometryFlame Temperatures12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 11IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Huggetts empirical observation: for most fuels, a more or less constant net amount of heat is released per unit mass of oxygen consumed for complete combustion. This constant is E = 13.1 + 0.6 kJ/g-O2

O2 consumption calorimetry12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 12

O2 consumption calorimetry12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 13Method 1: VAIR[IN] = constant, [O2][IN] = constant

Method 2: VAIR[IN] = VAIR[out], [O2][IN] = constant

Co-Flow TestsAtmosphere composition testsHeating Rate testsPurge gas flowrate tests

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 14Co-flow4 SLPMO2 inlet concentration20-21% (Air)Heating rate10 K/sPurge gas (N2)100 SCCMOperating ConditionsIntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Repeatability12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 15IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

5 PMMA Tests

Polystyrene Family12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 16

IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Results

1712/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

CE = measured O2 consumption / theoretical O2 consumption (assuming complete combustion)Results

1812/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Results

190.850.790.790.750.560.5912/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Analysis of FCC data

2012/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

FCC TheoreticalFCC Measured

Analysis of FCC data For PS-FR2 ( 27.4 wt.% Br)

21Gas phase combustion incompleteness:43%

Formation of sootFormation of CO and/or other incomplete combustion products32%11%CO. yld (wt.%): 39.3%12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Phosphorated flame retardantsWe have also studied a family of PBT with the addition of diethylphosphinate Al (Al-DEP) as flame retardant

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 22PBT75% PBT25% GlassPBT-263% PBT12% Al-DEP25% GlassPBT-355% PBT,20% Al-DEP25% GlassIntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

PBT12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 23

IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Flame Destabilization

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 24Baseline PBT (no flame retardant)Flame Destabilization12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 2563% PBT, 12% Al-DEP

Flame Destabilization12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 26

63% PBT, 12% Al-DEPFlame Destabilization12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 2755% PBT, 20% Al-DEP

Flame TemperaturesIn a fire, flame temperature is an indicator of relative strength of heat feedback to solidTemperature measurements can guide us in determining how well can the flame sustain itselfWe have measured temperatures in propane flames as initial step towards actual polymer fueled flames12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 28IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Consumer DSLR camera modified to extend spectral response into NIRFlame images taken with narrow bandpass filters at 2 distinct wavelengths 1, 2Abel transform applied to images to recover radial intensity distribution S1, S2 from line of sight measurements2 Color Ratio Pyrometry12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 29

h = Plancks constantc = Speed of light in a vacuumk = Boltzmanns constantC2/C1 = Calibration constant12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 30IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

650 nm900 nm12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 31IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

650 nm900 nm

ConclusionsWe have successfully developed a new tool to test the flammability of mg-scale pyrolyzable solids, the FCCThe FCC has shown sensitivity to Bromine and PhosphorusFCC versatility allows to operate beyond a simple screening tool. Fully instrumented research tool allows to explore several operating conditionsFirst steps have been made towards the non-intrusive measurement of flame temperatures from polymer fuels

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 32IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

Future WorkExplore additional polymers and flame retardantsInvestigate flame temperatures under unsteady conditions, using polymer fuels (are brominated flames cooler?)Iterate on FCC design to improve robustness and usability12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 33IntroductionBrominated Flame RetardantsCurrent Test MethodsObjectives of Current WorkDevelopment of FCCDesign and CapabilitiesDiagnosticsParametric Testing andOperating ConditionsTest MatrixData Analysis

Experimental ResultsPolystyrene and BrominePBT and Al-DEPFlame Temperatures

Conclusions and Future Work

BASFDr. Richard Lyon (FAA)Richard Walters (FAA)Colleen Frances (UMD)Hai Qing Guo (UMD)Dr. Peter Sunderland (UMD)Acknowledgments12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 34Thank you!

Questions?12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 35Backup Slides12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 36 Method 137Combustion ProcessFlowmeterO2SensorAir

Baseline VAIR signal before test startBaseline [O2] signal before test start

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Method 238Combustion ProcessFlowmeterO2SensorAir

Baseline [O2] signal before test start=

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference According to Plancks law, the radiative emission of a body is a function of temperature, wavelength and emissivityManipulation of Plancks law shows that temperature can be expressed as a function of wavelength, emitted radiation and emissivityIf the relationship between emitted radiation and detected intensity of a camera is linear and known (through calibration), then the bodys temperature can be expressed as a function of detected intensity ratios, wavelengths and emissivities2 Color Ratio Pyrometry12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference 39Calculate Heat of complete combustion of each polymer assuming Huggetts principle Data analysis40PSPS-FR1 (6.85% Br)PS-FR2(27.4% Br)Chemical formula(C8H8)n(C8H7.892Br0.108)nC8H7.514Br0.486)n Hc(kJ/g)40.337.428.8

X 13.1 kJ/g-O2 12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Chemical formula of PS: (C8H8)n,Chemical formula of Saytex HP 3010 flame retardant: (C8H5.3Br2.7)n.Calculate gas-phase combustion efficiency

THR is the measured heat release normalized by initial sample massHchar= 34.9 kJ/g, assuming char consists of pure carbonchar.yld is the char yield (char mass normalized by initial sample mass)Data analysis41

12/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference

Soot yield is measured in FCC. Thus, theoretically the maximum combustion efficiency that can be measured in FCC is:

CEmax =

Hchar = Hsoot = 34.9 kJ/g, assuming both char and soot consist of pure carbon.Hc is the heat of complete combustion of a given material

Analysis of FCC data4212/5/20137th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference