february 20-21, 2014 t eacher p reparation t ransformation 2.0 p rofessional l earning i nstitute 1
TRANSCRIPT
February 20-21, 2014
TEACHER PREPARATION TRANSFORMATION 2.0
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING INSTITUTE
1
• Deepen knowledge of Common Core State Standards
• Provide input into prospectus• Provide input into aspirational
characteristics of clinical educators
Welcome & Meeting Objectives
2
Convergence of Core to College, CAEP, CAEP Alliance
and NTEP
Dr. Candice McQueen, Dean
Lipscomb University
APPROACHES AND RESOURCES TO HELP UNIVERSITY FACULTY DEVELOP A DEEPER
UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS
3
BREAK
4
Jeanne Burns & Linda McKee
CROSS CAMPUS COLLABORATION TO DEEPEN FACULTY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS WITH A FOCUS ON CAEP STANDARD 1 AND CAEP STANDARD 2
5
Task 1• (Small Group) Identify practices at Lipscomb
University• (Small Group) Identify practices in Louisiana’s
universities• (Large Group) Share identified practices• (Large Group) Identify existing resources in Louisiana
and new resources
6
Outcomes• List of resources and materials.• Awareness of strategies that support CAEP Standard 1 and 2.
BREAK AND DINNER at 5:30 PM
7
Institute reconvenes at 6:30 PM for discussion about
prospectus.
Potential Duration: 5 YearsPotential Amount of Funding: $5 to $8 million
Potential Source: Private Foundations
INPUT INTO A PROSPECTUS FOR MAJOR FUNDING TO SUPPORT NEEDS IDENTIFIED
FOR TEACHER PREPARATION TRANSFORMATION 2.0
8
Task 2• Identify Aspects of Teacher Preparation to be focus of
grant• Identify Outcome to be accomplished as a result of
the grant funds• Identify overall usage of the funds (e.g., campus
funding, state data collection, research to examine effective practices, etc.)
9
Outcomes• Understanding of how CTC, CAEP, NTEP, and grant prospectus will
support Teacher Preparation Transformation 2.0.• List of recommendations for inclusion in grant prospectus.
7:30 AM – 8:30 AM
BREAKFAST
10
Jeanne Burns & Linda McKee
NEW DIRECTIONS FOR CAEP ALLIANCE AND INPUT INTO CHARACTERISTICS OF
ASPIRATIONAL CLINICAL EDUCATORS FOR CAEP ALLIANCE CLINICAL EDUCATOR DESIGN
TEAM
11
Task 3• (Small Group) Share aspirational characteristics
identified by faculty, PK-12 educator partners, and others
• (Small Group) Select the 5 most important aspirational characteristics for university and PK-12 clinical educators
• (Large Group) Share the most important characteristics with the large group
12
Outcomes• List of aspirational characteristics of clinical educators.
LACTE Meeting at 9:45 AM
CLOSING
13