feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • household air quality...

19
Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters on indoor air pollution in households in Uganda Vianney Tumwesige a , Lauren Harroff b , Andrew Apsley a , Sean Sample a , Jo Smith a a University of Aberdeen; b Makerere University a b

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters on

indoor air pollution in households in Uganda

Vianney Tumwesigea, Lauren Harroffb, Andrew

Apsleya, Sean Samplea, Jo Smitha

a University of Aberdeen; bMakerere University

a b

Page 2: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Vianney Tumwesige,

University of Aberdeen

Page 3: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Biomass fuel use and poverty

Page 4: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Environment & Health…

• Humans spend much of their time indoors

• 3 billion people globally exposed to biomass smoke in homes

• Link to pneumonia, lung cancer, chronic lung diseases

• Estimated leads to ~1.2 million premature deaths annually

• In Uganda only 1.3% of rural people have access to modern fuels

Page 5: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

What do we mean by biomass?

Crop residues & dung

Charcoal

Wood

Page 6: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

What are the pollutants in biomass smoke?

• Fine particulate matter (‘smoke’) – PM2.5

– PM10

– Inhalable dust – Respirable dust

• Carbon Monoxide (CO)

• Airborne endotoxin (inflammatory agent)

• Other chemicals (PAHs, Arsenic, Aldeyhdes, Nitric Oxides, Benzene. Sulphur Dioxide)

Page 7: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

What is PM2.5?

• Small particles inhaled into deep areas of the lung

• Epidemiological evidence that PM2.5 air pollution is linked to respiratory and cardiovascular health effects

Page 8: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

A summary of biomass smoke risk…

Relative risk • Acute lower respiratory tract infection children <5y 2.3 (1.9-2.7) • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease women >30y 3.2 (2.3-4.8) men >30y 1.8 (1.0-3.2) • Lung cancer women >30y 1.9 (1.1-3.5) men >30y 1.5 (1.0-2.5) • Asthma children 5-14y 1.6 (1.0-2.5) >15y 1.2 (1.0-1.5) • Cataracts 1.3 (1.0-1.7) • Tuberculosis >15y 1.5 (1.0-2.4)

- Large increases in risks - Large population exposure (3 billion people globally) - Leads to ~1.2 million premature deaths annually

Page 9: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Estimated burden of disease for major risk factors

Measures as percentage of total healthy life years lost in the world in 2000

Page 10: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Air quality targets

…for fine particles PM2.5 - US EPA Air Quality Index

PM2.5 g/m3 AQI Advice

35 Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Heart/lung disease and elderly/ children advised to reduce prolonged exertion

65 Unhealthy Heart/lung disease/elderly/children avoid prolonged exertion; everyone reduce prolonged exertion

150 Very unhealthy Heart/lung disease avoid all physical activity; everyone avoid prolonged exertion

250 Hazardous Heart/lung disease remain indoors; everyone avoid physical activity

…for CO - WHO Air Quality Guidance

6ppm 24-hour mean

Page 11: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Methods PM2.5 and CO measured before and after installation of digesters in 9 household in Tiribogo, Uganda

Page 12: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Methods Direct reading instruments used

TSI AM510 Sidepak Lascar CO logger

PM2.5 CO

Page 13: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

PM2.5 and CO levels were measured over 24hours

Page 14: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Sampling issues

• Sampling equipment problems – Noise – Battery life – Interference

(sources/deliberate) – Cost/security – Modifications of behaviour

• Personal exposures up to 4 times higher than area/static sampling

Page 15: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Typical household exposure over 24 hours

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Carb

on M

onox

ide

Conc

entr

atio

n pp

m

PM2.

5Co

ncen

trat

ion

gm-3

Time

PM2.5

Carbon Monoxide

Page 16: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

H1 H11 H13 H17 H20 H21 H24 H27 H47

Ave.

CO

Co

nc

(p

pm

)

Households

Average before

Average after

Household exposure to CO (ppm)

Including All Excluding H27 & H13

Mean % Change 24% -25%

Median % Change -27% -33%

EPA limit

Page 17: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

H1 H11 H13 H17 H20 H21 H24 H27 H47

Avera

ge

PM

2.5

Co

nc

gm

-3)

Households

Pre-installation

PostInstallation

Including All Excluding H13 & H27

Mean % Change 352% -32%

Median % Change -25% -31%

Household exposure to PM2.5

WHO limit

Page 18: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Conclusions

• Median reduction in PM2.5 and CO are 25%

and 27% respectively

• Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3)

• To bring household air quality within safe limits, biogas use should be sufficient to reduce firewood use to less than 10 kg day-1 household-1

Page 19: Feasibility study assessing the impact of biogas digesters ...€¦ · • Household air quality remains outside safe limits for CO (WHO = 6 ppm) and PM 2.5 (EPA = 250 g m-3) •

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Department for International Development (DfID) for supporting this work