false memories
DESCRIPTION
PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
PS114: Research Methods in Psychology
Introduction to Lab Class 1 False Memory
Week 6
Thursday, October 27, 2011
2
Memory failure
• An event occurs and you witness it but later you have no (poor or distorted) memory for it– If asked at the time you would describe the event
clearly • An event did NOT occur but later you thought that it
had occurred– If asked at the time you would say the event did
not occur
Thursday, October 27, 2011
3
Remembering an event
• A description of the event is stored when the event occurs (memory trace)
• When you remember the event you retrieve or access the memory trace
• Details of the event become available• Some details may be lost or confused with other
traces
Thursday, October 27, 2011
4
False memory• How can you remember an event that did not occur?• Create a memory trace as if the event occurred
– Lead the participant to believe that the event occurred
– Get participant to think about the event• Participant may confuse what was thought with what
was witnessed
Thursday, October 27, 2011
5
Applications
• False memory has important legal implications:• Bias of witnesses (memory distortion) by interrogation• False memories arising during extensive
psychotherapy
Thursday, October 27, 2011
6
Roediger & McDermott (1995)
• Highly influential study of false memory• False memories can occur
– in the laboratory– over short time scales– reliably produced by word associations
Thursday, October 27, 2011
7
Word associations
• to find the associates of a word– give the word as a cue– ask the participant for a response
• the general idea is that when the cue word is read other associated words are activated
• If I say “cat” you might think “dog”
Thursday, October 27, 2011
8
Roediger & McDermott
• They presented short word lists where all items were associates of a critical word or lure
• Immediate free recall of each list• After a delay, recognition of the words was tested• Recognition test consisted of words presented on the
list (old words)• And words not presented on list (new words)
Thursday, October 27, 2011
9
Roediger & McDermott’s stimuli
• The 96 words used during the study phase were a subset of words taken from lists of 16 words each.
• Each list had a theme.• During recognition phase, participants were presented with
48 old words and 48 new words• The 48 old words were a selection from the study set, with
equal numbers from each of the lists used.• The 48 new words were either taken from unused lists or
were lures• Lures are words taken from the same lists as words
presented in the study phase, but not previously presented.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
10
Example
• If CHAIR is the critical lure• List items are associates: table, seat, legs, sofa, • Recognition test consists of:• old words: table, seat, legs, sofa,• new words: dog, station, friend, flower• critical lure: chair
Thursday, October 27, 2011
11
Recognition test
• Words were shown singly, participants made old-new judgments (is the word old or new).
• If they thought the word was old, they should also make a remember-know judgment.
• A ‘remember’ judgment is given when the participant can mentally relive the experience of seeing the word.
• A ‘know’ judgment is defined as a high confidence that the item occurred in the list, but the participant is unable to re-experience their exposure to the word.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
12
Results
• Seven times more study words were classified as ‘old’ than new words (memory).
• The proportion of critical lures classified as ‘old’ was equal to the proportion of study words.
• Furthermore, the proportions of critical lures classified as remembered or known were equal to those for study words.
• Participants were unable to distinguish items actually presented from the critical lures.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
13
Why does false memory occur?
• When the study words are presented, associates activate the critical word
• When you see “seat” you think “chair”• Your memory for the words is based on what words
you thought about while the list was presented• Hence you falsely recognize critical lures related to
study words
Thursday, October 27, 2011
14
Lab Experiment
• A variation on Roediger and McDermott• Some aspects will be the same• Same stimuli: we will use words from their lists, both
during the study phase and during the recognition phase.
• Same structure: study list; filled retention interval; recognition test
Thursday, October 27, 2011
15
Lab Experiment
• A variation on Roediger and McDermott• Other aspects will be different• Task: participants will be asked to rate their
confidence that they recognize or do not recognize the word
• The total list of 96 words will be randomly presented, rather than in their individual groups.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
16
Variables
• Independent variable: (manipulated by experimenter)– Type of word– Three levels: old words, new words, and critical
lures
• Dependent variable: (measure of performance)– Recognition confidence rating
Thursday, October 27, 2011
17
Randomizing the Study list
• It is conceivable that participants are encouraged to think of a theme for the words that are presented in groups
• This experiment will randomize the entire study list
Thursday, October 27, 2011
18
Procedure
• Study phase:• 96 words: 12 words each from 8 of R&M’s lists
• Recognition phase:• 40 old words: five of the words previously seen, taken
from each of the 8 study-phase lists• 8 critical lures: the 8 themes of the above lists• 48 new words: 6 words each from 8 of R&M’s lists,
NOT previously presented
Thursday, October 27, 2011
19
Predictions
If lures are falsely recognized due to their association with the study words, then
• Participants will be confident they recognize the old words, and also confident they do not recognize the new words.
• Critical lures will be recognized the same as old words.
The above two findings would allow us to replicate and support the results of Roediger and McDermott (1995).
Thursday, October 27, 2011
20
Predictions
But, if lures are falsely recognized due to participants being encouraged to think of themes for the free recall task used by R&M, then randomizing the study list should eliminate the effect and
• Participants will be confident they recognize the old words, and also confident they do not recognize the new words.
• Critical lures will be recognized the same as new words.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
21
Predictions
Or something in between
• It may be the case that randomizing the study list weakens but does not eliminate the false memory effect.
• What pattern of result do you think might happen in that case?
Thursday, October 27, 2011
22
Roediger and McDermott
Roediger, H.L., III and McDermott, K.B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 803-814.
Available from short loan as XD6636, or from PsychArticles online, or from the library’s online resources, or here:
http://psych.wustl.edu/memory/Roddy article PDF‘s\Roediger and McDermott 1995.pdf
Thursday, October 27, 2011
23
On Thursday
Compulsory Data Collection– 2.708
See your personal timetable for your start time(2pm, 3pm or 4pm)
Thursday, October 27, 2011
24
Next week
• Generalization and sample size• Howitt & Cramer, Ch. 4
Thursday, October 27, 2011