fairfield-suisun unified school district board... · fairfield-suisun unified school district...

Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District

INFORMATION/ACTION ITEM

AGENDA ITEM: VIII-D-1 CATEGORY: SUPERINTENDENT/ADMINISTRATION/GOVERNING BOARD TITLE: Receive Recommendations from the Trustee Area Advisory

(TAAC) Committee (District Goal V) SUBMITTED BY: Jacki Cottingim-Dias, Ph.D., District Superintendent PREPARED BY: Kim Van Gundy, Director of Facilities and Construction SUMMARY

INFORMATION: In order to meet the legal requirements outlined in the California Voters Right Act of 2001 (CVRA), the Governing Board decided to modify the school board election process from at-large to a by-trustee area. On January 31, 2012, the Board voted to create a community-based committee to provide a recommendation for new boundaries for the seven elected positions. An advertisement was posted to the District’s website and published in the local paper to solicit interested parties. Applications were received and on March 8, 2012, the Governing Board appointed seven community members and one alternate to provide a recommendation on one of the three options. Board Member Dave Gaut and Board President Kathleen Marianno served with the committee members. The Committee was also assisted by demographer Ken Reynolds of SchoolWorks and legal counsel Dino Velez of Burke, Williams and Sorensen, LLP.

Under the leadership of the elected chairperson, Mr. Brian Purcell, the Committee met on four separate evenings in a public setting. The Committee used the following information to evaluate three options:

• Legal criteria outlined in the CVRA, including a legal analysis

by the firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen, LLP; • 2010 Census data on the population and ethnicity or race of

the District; • The District’s current school boundaries; • The Solano Community College Trustee Area boundaries; • Relevant demographic data provided by the firm of

SchoolWorks; • Locations of the various neighborhoods, cities, geographic

barriers and ethnic concentrations.

VIII-D-1 Receive Recommendations from the Trustee Area Advisory (TAAC) Committee (District Goal V)

The goal of the committee was to create seven trustee areas which cumulatively mirror the ethnicity of the District. The areas have no more than a 10% total population variance. The Committee voted unanimously to select Plan 3 with minor modifications. The modifications created two very similar scenarios (Plan 3A and 3B) resulting in a 5:4 vote approving Plan 3B.

Because the vote was close and the plans were similar, the Committee created summary points identifying the positive attributes for Plan 3A and Plan 3B. Both proposals are included, along with the summary points, for the Governing Board’s consideration.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A FUNDING SOURCE: N/A DATE: August 23, 2012

SchoolWorks, Inc. 6815 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 3 Carmichael, CA 95608

(916) 733-0402 (916) 733-0404-Fax www.SchoolWorksGIS.com

Modified Trustee Boundary Plan Fairfield-Suisun Unified

School District

FAIRFIELD-SUISUN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 2490 Hilborn Road Fairfield, CA 94534 (707) 399-5000

Jacki Cottingim-Dias Superintendent

A P R I L 2 0 1 2

Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District Modified Trustee Boundary Plan

April 2012 Page 1

Introduction This report has been prepared for the Trustee Area Analysis Committee (TAAC) of the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District to illustrate a potential option that can be considered for the implementation of Trustee Boundaries. The modified Plan 3a Trustee Map will be analyzed to determine if it meet the legal requirements of the State and Federal laws. The main requirement is making sure that each Trustee Area represents the same population. Utilizing the 2010 Census data we will show how many people reside in each Trustee Area and then determine the variance from the goal population. As long as the peak variance is less than 10% between the areas with the smallest and largest populations, then the Trustee Map would meet the legal requirement. Secondly, the Racial/Ethnic statistics will be provided for each of the proposed Trustee Boundary Areas. The TAAC can utilize this additional information to help determine which plan will best serve the District and its constituents. Trustee Boundary Maps and Analysis This section of the report will provide information on the boundary scenario Plan 3a which the TAAC could consider for the purpose of creating "Trustee Areas" for the District. Each scenario is analyzed using the 2010 Census data which contains data on the population and the ethnicity or race for each individual. The data is also provided for just those people that are at least 18 years old which would be representative of the adult population. The general guidelines used in the development of this scenario include the following: Keep communities together Current School Boundaries Natural Boundaries (Highways, rivers, railroads) Contiguous Areas (Legal Requirement) Ethnic Make-up of the District

The Census data from the state is broken down into Census Blocks which can be anywhere in size from an inner city block to acres of farmland. To create Trustee Areas, SchoolWorks follows the general guidelines (listed above) to combine Census Blocks. Census Blocks are the basic units used to create Trustee Areas and they cannot be split. Due to this, attempting to create a plan with clean boundaries that balances the total population while attempting to keep Ethnic groups together can be very difficult in some instances.


April 2012 Page 2

Trustee Area - Plan 3a

Area 1Area 1Area 1Area 1Area 1Area 1Area 1Area 1Area 1

555555555


Area 3Area 3Area 3Area 3Area 3Area 3Area 3Area 3Area 3 Area 2Area 2Area 2Area 2Area 2Area 2Area 2Area 2Area 2


444444444


April 2012 Page 3

Trustee Area - Plan 3a Close-Up

Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 5Area 4Area 4Area 4Area 4Area 4Area 4Area 4Area 4Area 4






April 2012 Page 4

Area: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TotalTrustees: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7

Population 18,367 18,709 17,973 18,332 17,847 18,851 18,586 128,665% of Total Pop. 14.28% 14.54% 13.97% 14.25% 13.87% 14.65% 14.45%

Ideal Pop. 18,381 18,381 18,381 18,381 18,381 18,381 18,381Ideal Pop. % 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29%

PeakDeviation -14 328 -408 -49 -534 470 205 1,004Dev % -0.07% 1.79% -2.22% -0.27% -2.90% 2.56% 1.12% 5.46%


18+ Population 13,633 14,029 14,191 12,776 12,542 13,332 13,950 94,453% of Pop. 14.43% 14.85% 15.02% 13.53% 13.28% 14.11% 14.77%


PeakDeviation 140 536 698 -717 -951 -161 457 1,649Dev % 1.04% 3.97% 5.17% -5.32% -7.05% -1.20% 3.38% 12.22%


CVAP 11,533 12,296 13,722 9,143 9,298 11,188 13,134 80,314% of Pop. 14.36% 15.31% 17.09% 11.38% 11.58% 13.93% 16.35%


PeakDeviation 60 823 2,249 -2,330 -2,175 -285 1,661 4,579Dev % 0.52% 7.17% 19.60% -20.31% -18.96% -2.49% 14.47% 39.91%

Peak Deviation may not exceed 10%.

CVAP Statistics

Fairfield-Suisun Unified School DistrictCensus 2010 Data Summary by Trustee Areas

Plan 3aTotal Population Statistics

18+ Population Statistics


April 2012 Page 5

Area: 1 % 2 % 3 % 4 %Trustees: 1 1 1 1

Total Population 18,367 18,709 17,973 18,332Hispanic 4,118 22.42% 4,988 26.66% 3,160 17.58% 8,738 47.67%White - NH 6,206 33.79% 7,250 38.75% 8,841 49.19% 4,538 24.75%Black - NH 3,148 17.14% 2,866 15.32% 2,382 13.25% 2,524 13.77%American Indian - NH 63 0.34% 74 0.40% 85 0.47% 93 0.51%Asian - NH 3,391 18.46% 2,203 11.78% 2,208 12.29% 1,279 6.98%Pacific Islander - NH 191 1.04% 214 1.14% 163 0.91% 155 0.85%Other - NH 42 0.23% 27 0.14% 31 0.17% 33 0.18%Multiple Races - NH 1,208 6.58% 1,087 5.81% 1,103 6.14% 972 5.30%

18+ Population 13,633 14,029 14,191 12,776Hispanic 2,564 18.81% 3,167 22.57% 2,144 15.11% 5,292 41.42%White - NH 5,142 37.72% 6,087 43.39% 7,523 53.01% 3,877 30.35%Black - NH 2,362 17.33% 2,140 15.25% 1,902 13.40% 1,789 14.00%American Indian - NH 51 0.37% 60 0.43% 75 0.53% 72 0.56%Asian - NH 2,677 14.58% 1,773 9.48% 1,811 10.08% 1,057 5.77%Pacific Islander - NH 157 1.15% 169 1.20% 141 0.99% 117 0.92%Other - NH 28 0.21% 21 0.15% 25 0.18% 25 0.20%Multiple Races - NH 652 4.78% 612 4.36% 570 4.02% 547 4.28%

CVAP 11,533 12,296 13,722 9,143Hispanic 1,591 13.80% 1,776 14.44% 1,518 11.06% 1,744 19.07%White - NH 5,499 47.68% 6,130 49.85% 7,934 57.82% 4,269 46.69%Black - NH 2,028 17.58% 2,376 19.32% 1,704 12.42% 1,826 19.97%American Indian - NH 20 0.17% 56 0.46% 80 0.58% 43 0.47%Asian - NH 1,992 17.27% 1,422 11.56% 1,971 14.36% 908 9.93%Pacific Islander - NH 70 0.61% 192 1.56% 11 0.08% 75 0.82%Multiple Races - NH 333 2.89% 344 2.80% 504 3.67% 278 3.04%

NH = Not of Hispanic OriginCVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population


April 2012 Page 6

Area: 5 % 6 % 7 % Total %Trustees: 1 1 1 7

Total Population 17,847 18,851 18,586 128,665Hispanic 5,625 31.52% 3,826 20.30% 4,223 22.72% 34,678 26.95%White - NH 4,394 24.62% 7,210 38.25% 6,423 34.56% 44,862 34.87%Black - NH 3,810 21.35% 2,009 10.66% 3,428 18.44% 20,167 15.67%American Indian - NH 84 0.47% 72 0.38% 60 0.32% 531 0.41%Asian - NH 2,482 13.91% 4,503 23.89% 3,016 16.23% 19,082 14.83%Pacific Islander - NH 214 1.20% 115 0.61% 240 1.29% 1,292 1.00%Other - NH 41 0.23% 48 0.25% 48 0.26% 270 0.21%Multiple Races - NH 1,197 6.71% 1,068 5.67% 1,148 6.18% 7,783 6.05%

18+ Population 12,542 13,332 13,950 94,453Hispanic 3,384 26.98% 2,395 17.96% 2,659 19.06% 21,605 22.87%White - NH 3,676 29.31% 5,548 41.61% 5,483 39.30% 37,336 39.53%Black - NH 2,666 21.26% 1,444 10.83% 2,539 18.20% 14,842 15.71%American Indian - NH 60 0.48% 59 0.44% 51 0.37% 428 0.45%Asian - NH 1,956 10.96% 3,304 17.53% 2,395 12.89% 14,973 11.64%Pacific Islander - NH 167 1.33% 87 0.65% 180 1.29% 1,018 1.08%Other - NH 27 0.22% 30 0.23% 32 0.23% 188 0.20%Multiple Races - NH 606 4.83% 465 3.49% 611 4.38% 4,063 4.30%

CVAP 9,298 11,188 13,134 80,314Hispanic 1,405 15.11% 1,636 14.62% 1,766 13.45% 11,436 14.24%White - NH 3,242 34.87% 5,540 49.52% 5,561 42.34% 38,175 47.53%Black - NH 2,488 26.76% 1,383 12.36% 2,852 21.71% 14,657 18.25%American Indian - NH 25 0.27% 81 0.72% 12 0.09% 317 0.39%Asian - NH 1,388 14.93% 2,180 19.49% 2,437 18.55% 12,298 15.31%Pacific Islander - NH 234 2.52% 114 1.02% 205 1.56% 901 1.12%Multiple Races - NH 516 5.55% 254 2.27% 301 2.29% 2,530 3.15%


In this scenario, the boundaries meet the requirement of being balanced when looking at the population totals. The area with the highest White population percentage would be Area 3. Area 4 would have the highest Hispanic population percentage.


April 2012 Page 7

Conclusion This report and these maps show the ammended Plan 3a based on feedback received from the Trustee Area Analysis Committee (TAAC) for the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District. The TAAC can choose to implement this plan or may choose to make some additional modifications or set some additional criteria to develop additional options that will meet the Districts goals. An amendment to this report will be provided in the case additional scenarios are needed.

SchoolWorks, Inc. 6815 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 3 Carmichael, CA 95608

(916) 733-0402 (916) 733-0404-Fax www.SchoolWorksGIS.com

Modified Trustee Boundary Plan Fairfield-Suisun Unified

School District

FAIRFIELD-SUISUN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 2490 Hilborn Road Fairfield, CA 94534 (707) 399-5000

Jacki Cottingim-Dias Superintendent

A P R I L 2 0 1 2


April 2012 Page 1

Introduction This report has been prepared for the Trustee Area Analysis Committee (TAAC) of the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District to illustrate a potential option that can be considered for the implementation of Trustee Boundaries. The modified Plan 3b Trustee Map will be analyzed to determine if it meet the legal requirements of the State and Federal laws. The main requirement is making sure that each Trustee Area represents the same population. Utilizing the 2010 Census data we will show how many people reside in each Trustee Area and then determine the variance from the goal population. As long as the peak variance is less than 10% between the areas with the smallest and largest populations, then the Trustee Map would meet the legal requirement. Secondly, the Racial/Ethnic statistics will be provided for each of the proposed Trustee Boundary Areas. The TAAC can utilize this additional information to help determine which plan will best serve the District and its constituents. Trustee Boundary Maps and Analysis This section of the report will provide information on the boundary scenario Plan 3b which the TAAC could consider for the purpose of creating "Trustee Areas" for the District. Each scenario is analyzed using the 2010 Census data which contains data on the population and the ethnicity or race for each individual. The data is also provided for just those people that are at least 18 years old which would be representative of the adult population. The general guidelines used in the development of this scenario include the following: Keep communities together Current School Boundaries Natural Boundaries (Highways, rivers, railroads) Contiguous Areas (Legal Requirement) Ethnic Make-up of the District

The Census data from the state is broken down into Census Blocks which can be anywhere in size from an inner city block to acres of farmland. To create Trustee Areas, SchoolWorks follows the general guidelines (listed above) to combine Census Blocks. Census Blocks are the basic units used to create Trustee Areas and they cannot be split. Due to this, attempting to create a plan with clean boundaries that balances the total population while attempting to keep Ethnic groups together can be very difficult in some instances.


April 2012 Page 2

Trustee Area - Plan 3b

222222222

555555555444444444




State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80


April 2012 Page 3

Trustee Area - Plan 3b Close-Up







Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

Sunset Ave

State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12State Hwy 12

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Em

peror Dr

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Olive Ave

Walters R

dW

alters RdW

alters RdW

alters Rd

Walters Rd

Walters R

dW

alters RdW

alters RdW

alters Rd

Dover A

veD

over Ave

Dover A

veD

over Ave

Dover A

veD

over Ave

Dover A

veD

over Ave

Dover A

ve

East Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor AveEast Tabor Ave

Main St

Main St

Main St

Main St

Main St

Main St

Main St

Main St

Main St

West Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas StWest Texas St

Travis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis BlvdTravis Blvd

North Texas S

tN

orth Texas St

North Texas S

tN

orth Texas St

North Texas S

tN

orth Texas St

North Texas S

tN

orth Texas St

North Texas S

t

Air Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base ParkwayAir Base Parkway

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

I-80

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd

Hilborn Rd


April 2012 Page 4


Population 18,367 18,277 18,405 18,332 17,847 18,851 18,586 128,665% of Total Pop. 14.28% 14.21% 14.30% 14.25% 13.87% 14.65% 14.45%


PeakDeviation -14 -104 24 -49 -534 470 205 1,004Dev % -0.07% -0.56% 0.13% -0.27% -2.90% 2.56% 1.12% 5.46%


18+ Population 13,633 13,801 14,419 12,776 12,542 13,332 13,950 94,453% of Pop. 14.43% 14.61% 15.27% 13.53% 13.28% 14.11% 14.77%


PeakDeviation 140 308 926 -717 -951 -161 457 1,877Dev % 1.04% 2.28% 6.86% -5.32% -7.05% -1.20% 3.38% 13.91%


CVAP 11,533 11,131 14,887 9,143 9,298 11,188 13,134 80,314% of Pop. 14.36% 13.86% 18.54% 11.38% 11.58% 13.93% 16.35%


PeakDeviation 60 -342 3,414 -2,330 -2,175 -285 1,661 5,744Dev % 0.52% -2.98% 29.75% -20.31% -18.96% -2.49% 14.47% 50.06%

Peak Deviation may not exceed 10%.

CVAP Statistics

Fairfield-Suisun Unified School DistrictCensus 2010 Data Summary by Trustee Areas

Plan 3bTotal Population Statistics

18+ Population Statistics


April 2012 Page 5

Area: 1 % 2 % 3 % 4 %Trustees: 1 1 1 1

Total Population 18,367 18,277 18,405 18,332Hispanic 4,118 22.42% 5,375 29.41% 2,773 15.07% 8,738 47.67%White - NH 6,206 33.79% 5,849 32.00% 10,242 55.65% 4,538 24.75%Black - NH 3,148 17.14% 3,364 18.41% 1,884 10.24% 2,524 13.77%American Indian - NH 63 0.34% 98 0.54% 61 0.33% 93 0.51%Asian - NH 3,391 18.46% 2,017 11.04% 2,394 13.01% 1,279 6.98%Pacific Islander - NH 191 1.04% 270 1.48% 107 0.58% 155 0.85%Other - NH 42 0.23% 28 0.15% 30 0.16% 33 0.18%Multiple Races - NH 1,208 6.58% 1,276 6.98% 914 4.97% 972 5.30%

18+ Population 13,633 13,801 14,419 12,776Hispanic 2,564 18.81% 3,452 25.01% 1,859 12.89% 5,292 41.42%White - NH 5,142 37.72% 5,105 36.99% 8,505 58.98% 3,877 30.35%Black - NH 2,362 17.33% 2,564 18.58% 1,478 10.25% 1,789 14.00%American Indian - NH 51 0.37% 83 0.60% 52 0.36% 72 0.56%Asian - NH 2,677 14.58% 1,641 8.98% 1,943 10.56% 1,057 5.77%Pacific Islander - NH 157 1.15% 218 1.58% 92 0.64% 117 0.92%Other - NH 28 0.21% 20 0.14% 26 0.18% 25 0.20%Multiple Races - NH 652 4.78% 718 5.20% 464 3.22% 547 4.28%

CVAP 11,533 11,131 14,887 9,143Hispanic 1,591 13.80% 1,765 15.86% 1,529 10.27% 1,744 19.07%White - NH 5,499 47.68% 4,603 41.35% 9,461 63.55% 4,269 46.69%Black - NH 2,028 17.58% 2,598 23.34% 1,482 9.95% 1,826 19.97%American Indian - NH 20 0.17% 116 1.04% 20 0.13% 43 0.47%Asian - NH 1,992 17.27% 1,384 12.43% 2,009 13.49% 908 9.93%Pacific Islander - NH 70 0.61% 182 1.64% 21 0.14% 75 0.82%Multiple Races - NH 333 2.89% 483 4.34% 365 2.45% 278 3.04%



April 2012 Page 6

Area: 5 % 6 % 7 % Total %Trustees: 1 1 1 7

Total Population 17,847 18,851 18,586 128,665Hispanic 5,625 31.52% 3,826 20.30% 4,223 22.72% 34,678 26.95%White - NH 4,394 24.62% 7,210 38.25% 6,423 34.56% 44,862 34.87%Black - NH 3,810 21.35% 2,009 10.66% 3,428 18.44% 20,167 15.67%American Indian - NH 84 0.47% 72 0.38% 60 0.32% 531 0.41%Asian - NH 2,482 13.91% 4,503 23.89% 3,016 16.23% 19,082 14.83%Pacific Islander - NH 214 1.20% 115 0.61% 240 1.29% 1,292 1.00%Other - NH 41 0.23% 48 0.25% 48 0.26% 270 0.21%Multiple Races - NH 1,197 6.71% 1,068 5.67% 1,148 6.18% 7,783 6.05%

18+ Population 12,542 13,332 13,950 94,453Hispanic 3,384 26.98% 2,395 17.96% 2,659 19.06% 21,605 22.87%White - NH 3,676 29.31% 5,548 41.61% 5,483 39.30% 37,336 39.53%Black - NH 2,666 21.26% 1,444 10.83% 2,539 18.20% 14,842 15.71%American Indian - NH 60 0.48% 59 0.44% 51 0.37% 428 0.45%Asian - NH 1,956 10.96% 3,304 17.53% 2,395 12.89% 14,973 11.64%Pacific Islander - NH 167 1.33% 87 0.65% 180 1.29% 1,018 1.08%Other - NH 27 0.22% 30 0.23% 32 0.23% 188 0.20%Multiple Races - NH 606 4.83% 465 3.49% 611 4.38% 4,063 4.30%

CVAP 9,298 11,188 13,134 80,314Hispanic 1,405 15.11% 1,636 14.62% 1,766 13.45% 11,436 14.24%White - NH 3,242 34.87% 5,540 49.52% 5,561 42.34% 38,175 47.53%Black - NH 2,488 26.76% 1,383 12.36% 2,852 21.71% 14,657 18.25%American Indian - NH 25 0.27% 81 0.72% 12 0.09% 317 0.39%Asian - NH 1,388 14.93% 2,180 19.49% 2,437 18.55% 12,298 15.31%Pacific Islander - NH 234 2.52% 114 1.02% 205 1.56% 901 1.12%Multiple Races - NH 516 5.55% 254 2.27% 301 2.29% 2,530 3.15%


In this scenario, the boundaries meet the requirement of being balanced when looking at the population totals. The area with the highest White population percentage would be Area 3. Area 4 would have the highest Hispanic population percentage.


April 2012 Page 7

Conclusion This report and these maps show the modified Plan 3b based on feedback received from the Trustee Area Analysis Committee (TAAC) for the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District. The TAAC can choose to implement this plan or may choose to make some additional modifications or set some additional criteria to develop additional options that will meet the Districts goals. An amendment to this report will be provided in the case additional scenarios are needed.

Trustee Area - Plan 3 Close-Up








bettyv

Text Box

ORIGINAL PLAN 3

Trustee Area - Plan 3a Close-Up






SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad


Trustee Area - Plan 3b Close-Up








SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad

SP R

ailro

ad







323232323232323232

313131313131313131

262626262626262626

111111111

222222222

212121212121212121

222222222222222222272727272727272727

292929292929292929555555555303030303030303030

666666666 232323232323232323

242424242424242424

777777777

888888888

999999999

111111111111111111

121212121212121212

141414141414141414151515151515151515

161616161616161616

171717171717171717

252525252525252525181818181818181818

202020202020202020

101010101010101010

282828282828282828

191919191919191919

131313131313131313

333333333

444444444

Trustee Area - Plan 3a

1. Amy Blanc Site (PSA) 2. Bransford Site (Adult) 3. Cordelia Hills 4. Crescent 5. Fairview 6. Gordon 7. Jones 8. Kyle 9. Laurel Creek10. Mundy11. Oakbrook

12. Richardson Site13. Rolling Hills14. Root15. Sheldon16. Suisun17. Suisun Valley18. Tolenas19. Weir20. Wilson21. Crystal22. Dover (Sem Yeto)

23. Grange24. Green Valley25. Sullivan26. Armijo HS27. Fairfield HS28. Rodriguez HS29. Former Adult30. Falls Ed. Center31. Former Mary Bird32. Former Sem Yeto

School Legend







303030303030303030

262626262626262626

111111111

222222222

212121212121212121

222222222222222222272727272727272727

292929292929292929555555555

303030303030303030

666666666 232323232323232323

242424242424242424

777777777

888888888

999999999

111111111111111111

121212121212121212

141414141414141414313131313131313131151515151515151515

161616161616161616

171717171717171717

252525252525252525181818181818181818

202020202020202020

101010101010101010

282828282828282828

191919191919191919

131313131313131313

333333333

444444444

Trustee Area - Plan 3b

1. Amy Blanc Site (PSA) 2. Bransford Site (Adult) 3. Cordelia Hills 4. Crescent 5. Fairview 6. Gordon 7. Jones 8. Kyle 9. Laurel Creek10. Mundy11. Oakbrook

12. Richardson Site13. Rolling Hills14. Root15. Sheldon16. Suisun17. Suisun Valley18. Tolenas19. Weir20. Wilson21. Crystal22. Dover (Sem Yeto)

23. Grange24. Green Valley25. Sullivan26. Armijo HS27. Fairfield HS28. Rodriguez HS29. Former Adult30. Falls Ed. Center31. Former Mary Bird32. Former Sem Yeto

School Legend

In Support of Plan 3A In Support of Plan 3B

• Provides a more ethnically balanced

population in all Trustee Areas.

• Greater opportunity for diversity on the Board as a whole.

• Is more representative of the

composition of the District as a whole.

• More natural geographical boundaries for District’s Trustee areas.

• Requires the Trustee to represent an

area beyond their immediate community. For example, Rancho Solano and central Fairfield are combined in Plan Map 3.

• More cohesive communities of interest.

• Better chances for all neighborhoods

with a Trustee Area to be represented.

• Reduces the perception that the West side is a separate entity.

fairfield-suisun unified school district board... · fairfield-suisun unified school district...

Documents