The Failure of the Abortion and Contraceptive Industry Economic

Policies

Death for Nothing

Isaiah 57:11,12 And of whom hast thou been afraid or feared, that thou hast lied, and hast not remembered me, nor taken it to heart? Have not I even of long time held my peace, and thou fearest me not? I will declare thy righteousness, and thy works; and they shall not profit thee.

Part One: Promises, Failure and Contradictions

The economic model of the abortion and contraception industries promises prosperity within its own means.

The premise of the existence of such industries was that they existed to bring

prosperity and freedom in that prosperity that could not be had with the ‘burden’ of children who were presented to be ‘extra people’ as “non-contributing units” within that economic

model

Those industries appeared, out of nowhere, fully prepared to do their work, with ideological arguments fully polished and appeared as enablers of prosperity and economic stability for all.

Yet now the very economic prosperity they promised does not exist.

And in the midst of their utter failure to deliver economic benefits, they cry out that more children have to die for “the good of the economy”.

Democrat House speaker Nancy Pelosi, said that less children is good for the economy and plans to spend over 600 million dollars for public contraception and abortion.

Less babies has not been good for the economy. In fact, those that have killed their children by contraception and abortion to this day do not see the prosperity that was promised, only the worst economic times since the Great Depression. Contraception and Abortion are not and have never been “poverty insurance”.

The children have died for nothing.

There has been no economic benefit.

The Economic Policy of Prosperity of the Contraception and Abortion

Industries..

..was and is simply bait to get more people to kill their own children in the hopes of getting some of the Important Currency within the economic plan that worked with and justified abortion and contraception as poverty insurance measures and which has utterly failed.

Within the mindset of the same policy that seeks to reduce the population of the United States ‘for economic reasons’ , we see universal support for massive immigration ‘to fill jobs’.

A native of the United States might ask at this point: “What jobs?” as an indication of the failed policies that supposedly mandate the contraceptive and abortion industries.

Literally hundreds of thousands of jobs are being cut, while contraceptives and abortion are growth industries and illegal immigration is encouraged.

We see ‘humanitarian’ reasons to import massive amounts of persons into the US in the midst of such economic failure.

The economic downturn for Americans and especially for those who have killed their children for money, seems not to effect the obvious plenty that awaits the new immigrant in the eyes of the economic common sense of the contraception and abortion industries.

We see more people coming in and for which a plenty awaits, than we do children getting killed here for an economic benefit that has failed to materialize while the SAME economic policy claims both are necessary and supposedly not contradictory.

The population of the United States is being replaced and simultaneously being told the economic prosperity that is promised, yet that has failed to deliver again and again is for ..you?

Part Two:

More is More: Less is just ..less

more children means more people means more Labor

A single person can grow enough food to feed many other people in addition to themselves

People in cooperation with each other already produce surpluses of food and industrial goods that are wasted

Which is “more moral”?

To kill children on the premise that less children will mean a “better economic outcome” as implicit poverty insurance and “plenty for everyone”, even though such has never materialized as actual prosperity?

Or

To simply give the children what is already being produced and wasted?

or

To kill your children for the sake of giving that same surplus to illegal immigrants?

Less people means Less Labor

Less producers and buyers of goods and services

Less builders

Less maintainers

Less defenders

Less individuals bringing to the table of God and to the world what their individual gifts from Jesus Christ bring forth

Less people means poverty

Never forget:

In Warfare:

=

..equals less people

Part Three: But?

BUT!

Look at the massive poverty in India and Pakistan, in China –nations with vast populations. There, very obviously,

more people means poverty and is a proof that population control is necessary for economic benefit!

Really?

Why are they poor?

Are they really poor? Or are they simply defined to be poor to further a larger argument in favor of mere economic policies that are against children-as-wealth as a mere dogma?

Even if they are ‘really’ poor, they are poor within a very particular economic model that seeks to present itself as the only possible wealth and to keep away prosperity through any other path than itself –to keep them in it as a prison and say

there is no prison.

It presents itself not as a path to wealth; but as wealth itself as ‘knowledge’. Thus, it has a stake in defining all those who do not play according to its rules as “the poor” and in order to portray itself as compassionate, those same persons who do not play according to its rules are portrayed as “under educated and under privileged”.

Part Four: Truth, Reason or Dogma?

Why…

According to that economic theory, are lots of children, YOUR children as well, a supposed automatic sign of “poverty”?

Children as a supposed automatic sign of poverty is not truth or reason.

It’s dogma.

What do they get?

What do they receive for getting everyone to kill their children?

They get their god’s approval. That’s it.

No money. No land. No business. No prosperity for themselves. They are for the most part already wealthy and practice abortion and contraception among themselves. No benefit other than an ‘at-a-boy from the big faceless Presence they worship.

Part Five:

Ideological and Spiritual poker? You lose.

Would you play poker with ideology as your opponent and your children

as your money?

Have you?

Are you doing so with other people’s children through government?

According to documents by USAID, you as a taxpayer are

paying to ‘educate’ ‘poor’ people the world over that

contraceptives help their health and the environment and that to

stop having children makes them morally superior people.

USAID is proud to do so and to say such ploys are ‘from the American people’.

http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/global_health/pop/techareas/birthspacing/index.html

Go to their website: Family Planning and Family Spacing ( the new catchword to avoid alarming the target populace ) are well presented as the primary purpose of the agency.

They are not keeping it a secret.

Nor is the contraception and abortion ideology pushed by USAID trying to keep secret the fact they infiltrate target populations with agents as religious leaders to push their agenda:

From: http://www.jhuccp.org/pubs/fr/6/6.pdf ( In their own words; a qualitative study of family planning in Jordan )

“This research demonstrates that perceptions of religious principles are important, often decisive, factors in whether a couple will use modern methods. The clergy, as interpreters of religious principles, can help assure the public that family planning, including modern method use, is religiously acceptable.”

After studying Somali refugees to determine how to get them to get on the contraceptive/abortion

agenda:

From: Somali Perspectives on Child Spacing http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/refugee/metrotf/childspacing.pdf

“Strategies for encouraging FP Emphasize child spacing – family planning is

largely interpreted as limiting the size of one’s family, which is culturally unacceptable”

Here? In the U.S.?

Even now new “reports” and “research” pour forth from religious institutions as leading the way to stop childbirth under any pretext.

Heard that babies born in winter are supposedly on a fast track to socio-economic disadvantage and usually come from poorer mothers? That ‘report’ comes from Notre Dame, a Roman Catholic Institution. A report seeming to make contraceptives “culturally acceptable” via religious pretext…

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-01/uond-nss010709.php

Are American women to suddenly loath having ‘winter babies’?

What about “spring babies”?

Exactly what new family “spacing” schemes can we expect next from agents of the contraception and abortion industry from religious institutions?

As fast they can say it with your money, “poor” people; people defined as poor by the very economic model that has failed to deliver any of the prosperity it promised to you but has instead resulted in the worst loss of domestic jobs since the Great Depression even as it keep repeating its promises, is saying to ‘poor people’ the world over in your name and even here in the U.S.:

Use contraceptivesor be sterilized!

Get beads, better types and strains of crops, micro-loans and

livestock! Get more money!

Can I defineas you poor?

Under privileged?

Get beads, livestockand a menial Job in payment!

Heaven will love you!

Be sterilzed!

Desire to be pious?

Want to Ascend / Evolve to a Higher Lifestyle or being? It’s easy! It’s Safe! Tie your tubes! Swallow the Pill! Take the shot!

What is the basis of such logic?

1. That such logic takes place in an absence of other models of economics than the one in which temporary sterilization ( contraceptives ) or permanent sterilization are supposedly mandated to economically survive

2. That no one will ever find out that there is an alternative and even if they do, it will be too late.

The pillars of the economic model that mandates death of children as a standard part of a “healthy and

happy life” and as “economic development” as functional poverty

insurance?

One

There is an Important currency and if you don’t have it, you are by definition: POOR, UNEDUCATED and UNDERPRIVILEGED.

..economic warfare is cast as religious dictate so as portray a takeover of a target economy and population as a moral rescue of the ‘poor’ into the Important currency and what that currency can provide in total reality as that failed economic theory

so recognizable to you as failed in the present day

Two Whatever the limitations of that currency are, those same limitations must apply to all of total reality.

The first step in destroying a populationis to give them new religion based onnew powers of the object of worship: what can the new currency / the new Importance, deliver and how does one getthe currency to deliver its power?

Three

Extreme levels of education to teach you and the target population to not-see what is going on: to teach you to be blind.

Free education.

Scholarships. Especially to religious institutions.

Flattery. They will call you a Doctor once they give you a PhD.

Four: In attempts to deflect the failure of the economic polices of the contraception and abortion industries, the limitations of the Important Currency are said to be limited by “natural economic laws and cycles”.

Out of all the “natural laws and cycles” one might pick to assail in order to make the economic polices viable, what are the odds children would be the constant target and their death cycle-independent?

End of One of Two sets of Slides

Look for Second Set on Slideshare:

“The Failure of Abortion Industry Economic Policies: Part Two: Renting the definition of money to know what to owe to whom ..from whom?”

An Economic Issues and Warfare Presentation in the Basic Government Series

A Christian Clarity Media presentation 2009

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen