facilities work session fontana unified school district 05.09.07

FACILITIES WORK SESSIONFACILITIES WORK SESSIONFontana Unified School District 05.09.07Fontana Unified School District 05.09.07

22

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07Fontana Unified School DistrictFontana Unified School District

WORK SESSION AGENDAWORK SESSION AGENDA

PART I: Facilities Review and PART I: Facilities Review and RecommendationsRecommendations

PART II: FundingPART II: Funding

33


THE VISION:THE VISION:

A Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 12 system of A Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 12 system of schoolsschools

and support that serves the students and parents of and support that serves the students and parents of

Fontana “preparing students for a productive Fontana “preparing students for a productive future.”future.”

44



Elementary SchoolsElementary Schools focused on student acquisition of focused on student acquisition of foundational learning and thinking skills, on single foundational learning and thinking skills, on single

track, track, no larger than 800 students.no larger than 800 students.

Middle SchoolsMiddle Schools with a strong instructional emphasis on with a strong instructional emphasis on consolidating and applying fundamental learning and consolidating and applying fundamental learning and thinking skills, facilities no larger than 1,200 students.thinking skills, facilities no larger than 1,200 students.

55



High SchoolsHigh Schools that foster preparation for work, that that foster preparation for work, that provide provide

a wide range of student activities, no larger than a wide range of student activities, no larger than 2,500.2,500.

66

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07Fontana Unified School District

Part I: Facilities Review Part I: Facilities Review andand

RecommendationsRecommendations

77


INITIAL FACILITY DECISIONSINITIAL FACILITY DECISIONSFollowing the Facilities Work Session on 08.02.06, the Following the Facilities Work Session on 08.02.06, the

Board of Education made a number of facility decisions.Board of Education made a number of facility decisions.

Football Stadiums: Synthetic field surfacesFootball Stadiums: Synthetic field surfaces

Middle Schools: Build two middle schools #9 #10Middle Schools: Build two middle schools #9 #10

Middle Schools: Design enrollment target 1,200Middle Schools: Design enrollment target 1,200

High School #5: Design enrollment target of 2,100High School #5: Design enrollment target of 2,100

High School #5: Vocational career path technology, High School #5: Vocational career path technology, social services, transportation, social services, transportation,

hospitality hospitality

88


INITIAL FACILITY DECISIONSINITIAL FACILITY DECISIONS

High School Vocational Career Paths: Additional High School Vocational Career Paths: Additional

emphasis to make these vocational career paths emphasis to make these vocational career paths

available to other students in the District with available to other students in the District with student transportation provided.student transportation provided.

Binks & Beech Avenue: Complete w/bond fundsBinks & Beech Avenue: Complete w/bond funds

G/O Bonds: First issuance $90,000,000G/O Bonds: First issuance $90,000,000

CFD Bonds: Target issuance $35,789,226CFD Bonds: Target issuance $35,789,226

99


INITIAL DECISIONS INITIAL DECISIONS – – G/O Bond 1G/O Bond 1st st Issuance $90M Issuance $90M

COP’s paid offCOP’s paid off $32,139,226$32,139,226

FB Stadium @ A. B. Miller HSFB Stadium @ A. B. Miller HS $8,600,000$8,600,000

FB Stadium @ Kaiser HSFB Stadium @ Kaiser HS $8,600,000$8,600,000

ES #30 purchase siteES #30 purchase site $8,000,000$8,000,000

ES #33 purchase siteES #33 purchase site $6,200,000$6,200,000

HS #5 through DSAHS #5 through DSA $7,000,000$7,000,000

1010


INITIAL DECISIONS - INITIAL DECISIONS - G/O Bond 1G/O Bond 1stst Issuance Issuance $90M$90M

ES #34 complete site assessmentES #34 complete site assessment $500,000$500,000



MS #9 complete site assessment, purchase MS #9 complete site assessment, purchase property, design through DSAproperty, design through DSA

$8,000,000$8,000,000

ES #28 & #31 complete ES #28 & #31 complete construction construction

$7,960,774$7,960,774

1111


INITIAL DECISIONS - INITIAL DECISIONS - CFD Bonds $35,789,226CFD Bonds $35,789,226

Porter ES: project completionPorter ES: project completion $5,000,000$5,000,000

Summit HS: project completionSummit HS: project completion $8,000,000$8,000,000

ES #28 & #31: project completionES #28 & #31: project completion $1,039,226$1,039,226

Fontana MS, No./So. Tamarind: project Fontana MS, No./So. Tamarind: project completioncompletion

$6,750,000$6,750,000

MS #10: completion design through DSAMS #10: completion design through DSA $3,000,000$3,000,000

Modernization: Cypress, Primrose, Live Oak, Modernization: Cypress, Primrose, Live Oak, Maple, Oleander, Fontana MSMaple, Oleander, Fontana MS

$12,000,000$12,000,000

Total CFD BondsTotal CFD Bonds $35,789,226$35,789,226

1212


PROJECT STATUS – PROJECT STATUS – PROPERTYPROPERTY

SchoolSchool LocationLocation StatuStatu

ssSchoolSchool LocationLocation StatusStatus

ES ES #28#28

Beech AvenueBeech Avenue OwnOwn ES#37ES#37 Inside ArboretumInside Arboretum On On HoldHold

ES#31ES#31 Kathy BinksKathy Binks OwnOwn MS#9MS#9 Citrus/BaselineCitrus/Baseline Neg.Neg.

ES#32ES#32 Maple/FoothillMaple/Foothill OwnOwn MS#10MS#10 Arboretum NorthArboretum North

FontanaFontanaOwnOwn

ES#33ES#33 Curtis/Curtis/CatawbaCatawba

OwnOwn HS#5HS#5 Curtis/SloverCurtis/Slover OwnOwn

ES#34ES#34 Summit/SierraSummit/Sierra Neg.Neg. CCHSCCHS Santa Santa Ana/CypressAna/Cypress

OwnOwn

ES#35ES#35 Citrus Heights Citrus Heights NorthNorth

Neg.Neg. M & OM & O Ruble MSRuble MS OwnOwn

ES#36ES#36 Arboretum Arboretum North FontanaNorth Fontana

Neg.Neg.

1313


RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS

MTYR to Single Track MTYR to Single Track Schools Schools

Jurupa HillsJurupa Hills

Build Out ScheduleBuild Out Schedule

K – 8 SchoolK – 8 School

1414


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: MTYR – SINGLE TRACK: MTYR – SINGLE TRACK

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 2008/09ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 2008/09

South of 10 FreewaySouth of 10 Freeway Canyon CrestCanyon Crest

ChaparralChaparral

Oak ParkOak Park

Shadow HillsShadow Hills

Other Elementary SchoolsOther Elementary Schools JuniperJuniper

1515

Schools South of the 10 Freeway:Schools South of the 10 Freeway:Classroom Need ComparisonClassroom Need Comparison

Based on K-5 Resident student countsBased on K-5 Resident student counts Current BoundaryCurrent Boundary

New Potential BoundaryNew Potential Boundary

1616

MTYR – Single Track:MTYR – Single Track:Schools South of the 10 FreewaySchools South of the 10 Freeway

Current Elementary School BoundariesCurrent Elementary School Boundaries Resident K-5 Student PopulationsResident K-5 Student Populations

Oak Park:

Shadow Hills:

1717

RECOMMENDTAIONRECOMMENDTAION: MTYR – Single : MTYR – Single Track:Track:

Schools South of 10 FreewaySchools South of 10 Freeway Potential Future Boundary AdjustmentPotential Future Boundary Adjustment Resident K-5 Student Population Resident K-5 Student Population

ComparisonComparison

Oak Park:

Shadow Hills:

1818


DISCUSSION: K-5 AND/OR K-6 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSDISCUSSION: K-5 AND/OR K-6 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

K-5 K-6 for the sequential feeder patternK-5 K-6 for the sequential feeder pattern

Close Jurupa Hills for 2008/09Close Jurupa Hills for 2008/09

Keep 6Keep 6thth grade in feeder elementary schools grade in feeder elementary schools

A lot less busingA lot less busing

Possible GATE magnet at Live Oak or West Possible GATE magnet at Live Oak or West RandallRandall

1919

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.0907FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.0907Fontana Unified School DistrictFontana Unified School District

RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: JURUPA HILLS: JURUPA HILLS

Beginning with the 2008/09 school year, Jurupa Hills beBeginning with the 2008/09 school year, Jurupa Hills be

converted into alternate educational use (older converted into alternate educational use (older students).students).

District Adult Education centerDistrict Adult Education center

Would also house adult education special Would also house adult education special educationeducation

Technical training center for students at HS#5 Technical training center for students at HS#5 & &

CCHSCCHS

2020

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07Fontana Unified SchoolFontana Unified School

RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: BUILD OUT SCHEDULE: BUILD OUT SCHEDULE

HIGHSCHOOL

#5

CITRUS CONT.HIGH

SCHOOL

MIDDLESCHOOL

#10ELM.#36

ELEMENTARYSCHOOL

#33

ELEMENTARYSCHOOL

#30

2121


2222


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: HIGH SCHOOL : HIGH SCHOOL #5#5

Capacity: 2,100Capacity: 2,100 DSA: 04/2007 to 12/2007DSA: 04/2007 to 12/2007 Bid: 01/2008 to 2/2008Bid: 01/2008 to 2/2008 Contract Award: 03/2008Contract Award: 03/2008 Construction: 24 monthsConstruction: 24 months Open: 09/2010Open: 09/2010 AIA: WLC AIA: WLC CM: Neff ConstructionCM: Neff Construction

2323

High School ZonesHigh School Zones

2424


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: CITRUS CONTINUATION HS: CITRUS CONTINUATION HS

Move new Citrus Continuation High School from the initialMove new Citrus Continuation High School from the initial

site located east of the intersection of Santa Ana Avenuesite located east of the intersection of Santa Ana Avenue

and Cypress to the northwest corner of Santa Ana Avenueand Cypress to the northwest corner of Santa Ana Avenue

and Cypress.and Cypress.

This site was originally purchased for MS #8 and is the oldThis site was originally purchased for MS #8 and is the old

mushroom farm.mushroom farm.

2525

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07Fontana Unified School


I.I. District owns both sites and both sites purchased District owns both sites and both sites purchased with re-development funds.with re-development funds.

II.II. Move sites because:Move sites because:A. New site larger 18.72 acres vs. 7.6 acres.A. New site larger 18.72 acres vs. 7.6 acres.B. Initial site not large enough and possible B. Initial site not large enough and possible

expansion site not owned by District and has expansion site not owned by District and has ““”.”.

III.III. New site allows for construction of gymnasium, New site allows for construction of gymnasium, additional classrooms, future expansion of CCHS additional classrooms, future expansion of CCHS and development of outdoor fields.and development of outdoor fields.

2626


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: CITRUS CONTINUATION : CITRUS CONTINUATION HSHS

IV.IV. Possible use of gymnasium and fields by High Possible use of gymnasium and fields by High SchoolSchool#5 and possible community joint use.#5 and possible community joint use.

V.V. Move to new site makes good use of this site.Move to new site makes good use of this site.

VI.VI. Initial site could be sold – however, ………Initial site could be sold – however, ………

VII.VII. CEQA/CDE requirements for new site - CEQA/CDE requirements for new site -

2727


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: CITRUS CONTINUATION : CITRUS CONTINUATION HSHSBuilding Capacity: 750Building Capacity: 750

Architect: NTDStichlerArchitect: NTDStichler

CM: Paul Miller ConstructionCM: Paul Miller ConstructionInitial Site Initial Site

ConstructioConstructionn

RecommendRecommended Site ed Site

ConstructionConstruction

Estimated Initial Construction Cost Estimated Initial Construction Cost $20,000,00$20,000,0000

$20,000,000$20,000,000

Estimated Cost to Build Gym, Classrooms, Play Estimated Cost to Build Gym, Classrooms, Play FieldsFields

$5,500,000$5,500,000

Adjusted Estimated Construction Cost Adjusted Estimated Construction Cost

$25,500,000$25,500,000

Estimated architectural/engineering fees to re-plan facility on Estimated architectural/engineering fees to re-plan facility on new site and design gym, classrooms, play fields $800,000. new site and design gym, classrooms, play fields $800,000. Additional CEQA and CDE fees TBD.Additional CEQA and CDE fees TBD.

2828



Possible Timeframe:Possible Timeframe: AIA w/Move of Site: 4 – 6 months of AIA w/Move of Site: 4 – 6 months of additional workadditional work

DSA & CDE: 02/2008 to 05/2008DSA & CDE: 02/2008 to 05/2008

Bid: 06/2008 to 7/2008Bid: 06/2008 to 7/2008

Contract Award: 08/2008Contract Award: 08/2008

Construction: 18 monthsConstruction: 18 months

Open: 02/2010Open: 02/2010

2929


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION:: K-8 SchoolK-8 School ( (MS 10/ES 36)MS 10/ES 36)

Location: Arboretum at North Fontana Location: Arboretum at North Fontana Development: Lewis DevelopmentDevelopment: Lewis Development School: Pre-K/K and 1School: Pre-K/K and 1stst-8-8thth Grade Building Grade Building Design Capacity: K-8 853 (Design Capacity: K-8 853 (Kdg.-64, GradesKdg.-64, Grades

1-6: 441; Grades 7-8: 300; Sp. Ed.: 48)1-6: 441; Grades 7-8: 300; Sp. Ed.: 48) AIA: Cunningham GroupAIA: Cunningham Group CM: California Construction Management CM: California Construction Management Status: Design DevelopmentStatus: Design Development

3030


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION:: K-8 SCHOOL (MS 10/ES 35) K-8 SCHOOL (MS 10/ES 35)

Advantages of K-8 School:Advantages of K-8 School:

a)a) Research shows that the fewer transitions a student Research shows that the fewer transitions a student makes, the better chance for student success.makes, the better chance for student success.

b)b) K-8 school provides a continuous curriculum and K-8 school provides a continuous curriculum and evaluation of the student.evaluation of the student.

c)c) School becomes a “small community” withSchool becomes a “small community” withcommunity volunteers, teachers know all the community volunteers, teachers know all the students as the students move through the students as the students move through the

school.school.

3131


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: ELEMENTARY #33: ELEMENTARY #33

Location: Curtis and CatawbaLocation: Curtis and CatawbaAIA: Higginson + Cartozian ArchitectsAIA: Higginson + Cartozian ArchitectsCM: Facility GroupCM: Facility Group

Construction of school will assist in shifting Construction of school will assist in shifting enrollmentenrollment

from Sierra Lakes Elementary School and give the from Sierra Lakes Elementary School and give the DistrictDistrict

a second elementary school north of the 210.a second elementary school north of the 210.

3232


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: ELEMENTARY #33: ELEMENTARY #33

Possible Timeline:Possible Timeline: Capacity: 750Capacity: 750 Complete AIA Plans: 07/2007 to 11/2007Complete AIA Plans: 07/2007 to 11/2007 DSA & CDE: 12/2007 to 04/2008DSA & CDE: 12/2007 to 04/2008 Bid: 05/2008 Bid: 05/2008 Contract Award: 07/2008Contract Award: 07/2008 Construction: 14 MonthsConstruction: 14 Months Open: 01/2010Open: 01/2010

3333


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #30: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #30

School: Elementary #30School: Elementary #30Architect: Ruhnau Ruhnau ClarkeArchitect: Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke

3434


Part II: FundingPart II: Funding

3535


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: Community Facility District : Community Facility District FundingFunding

Based on the sale of Community Facility District Based on the sale of Community Facility District (CFD)(CFD)

Certificates of Participation (CFD’s), the initial Certificates of Participation (CFD’s), the initial decisiondecision

regarding the use of the CFD bonds, as well as the regarding the use of the CFD bonds, as well as the first first

general obligation bond issuance, need to be general obligation bond issuance, need to be revised.revised.

Initial FundsInitial Funds Revised Revised FundsFunds

G/O BondsG/O Bonds $90,000,00$90,000,0000

$90,000,000$90,000,000

CFD COP’sCFD COP’s $35,789,22$35,789,2266

$45,000,000$45,000,000

3636


RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: CFD’s: CFD’s

The sale of the CFD Certificates of Participation The sale of the CFD Certificates of Participation was done under the legal terms that these funds was done under the legal terms that these funds can only be used to fund projects and/or can only be used to fund projects and/or equipment purchases that are new and necessary equipment purchases that are new and necessary because of enrollment increases caused by the because of enrollment increases caused by the sale of new housing.sale of new housing.

Thus, there is the need to Thus, there is the need to RECOMMENDRECOMMEND revising revising the initial decisions regarding the use of the initial the initial decisions regarding the use of the initial G/O Bond issuance and CFD COP’S. G/O Bond issuance and CFD COP’S.

3737


INFORMATIONINFORMATION: FUNDING: FUNDING

ProjectProjectEstimated Estimated

Construction Construction CostCost

Estimated Estimated

Total Project CostTotal Project Cost

HS #5HS #5 $105,000,000$105,000,000 $140,000,000$140,000,000

CCHSCCHS $25,500,000$25,500,000 $35,500,000$35,500,000

MS MS #10/ES #10/ES

# 36# 36$40,000,000$40,000,000 $55,000,000$55,000,000

ES #33ES #33 $20,000,000$20,000,000 $26,000,000$26,000,000

ES #30ES #30 $20,000,000$20,000,000 $26,000,000 + $26,000,000 + Purchase of SitePurchase of Site

3838

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07Fontana Unified SchoolFontana Unified School

RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION: G/O BONDS: G/O BONDS

G/O Bond “Bridge Financing” $164,000,000 (+/-) G/O Bond “Bridge Financing” $164,000,000 (+/-)

Done using Certificates of Participation (COP’s)Done using Certificates of Participation (COP’s)

Same process as used prior to bond Same process as used prior to bond referendumreferendum

G/O Bond ReferendumG/O Bond Referendum $275,000,000 $275,000,000First IssuanceFirst Issuance ($ 90,000,000)($ 90,000,000)COP’sCOP’s ($164,000,000)($164,000,000)RemainingRemaining $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000

3939

FACILITIES WORK SESSION 05.09.07Fontana Unified School

INFORMATION: State FundingINFORMATION: State Funding

SFP GRANT ELIGIBILITY – STATESFP GRANT ELIGIBILITY – STATE

GradeGrant

Amount*

School Size (# grants use)

State Share * (Equal District

Share Required)

Minimum Total Project* (State

+ District Share)

K-6 $8,081 650 $5,252,650 $10,505,300

7-8 $8,546 1,200 $10,255,200 $20,510,400

9-12 $10,873 2,500 $27,182,500 $54,365,000

4040


INFORMATIONINFORMATION: State Funding: State Funding OPSC Enrollment Projection: OPSC Enrollment Projection:

- CBEDS count (current + 3 prior years; cohort)- CBEDS count (current + 3 prior years; cohort)

- Special Education Severe/Non-Severe counts- Special Education Severe/Non-Severe counts

- Planned new dwelling units approved Tentative - Planned new dwelling units approved Tentative Tract Tract

MapsMaps

- Student generation factor - Student generation factor

OPSC Classroom CapacityOPSC Classroom Capacity

OPSC Eligibility Baseline (difference of capacity v. OPSC Eligibility Baseline (difference of capacity v.

students)students)

4141


NEW CONSTRUCTION ELIGIBILITYNEW CONSTRUCTION ELIGIBILITYSample CalculationSample Calculation

Current 5-Yr. Proj. Enrollment: K-6Current 5-Yr. Proj. Enrollment: K-6 22,55622,556Previous 5-Yr Proj. Enrollment (04/05) K-6 Previous 5-Yr Proj. Enrollment (04/05) K-6

(26,126)(26,126)Equals Change in student grants which Equals Change in student grants which

( 3,570)( 3,570) either adds to or subtracts from eligibilityeither adds to or subtracts from eligibilityFunds returned on cancelled projects or Funds returned on cancelled projects or expired funding add back grants expired funding add back grants

375375

4242


NEW CONSTRUCTION ELIGIBILITY:NEW CONSTRUCTION ELIGIBILITY:

Sample Calculation SummarySample Calculation SummaryPrevious Eligibility K-6Previous Eligibility K-6 2,2492,249

Change due to previous eligibilityChange due to previous eligibility (3,570)(3,570)

Grants from funds returned 375Grants from funds returned 375

New Grant Eligibility K-6New Grant Eligibility K-6 (946)(946)

4343


CAUSES OF DECLINE IN SFP GRANT CAUSES OF DECLINE IN SFP GRANT ELIGIBILITYELIGIBILITY

Decrease in student enrollment.Decrease in student enrollment. Fewer planned new developments or Fewer planned new developments or

developments not built.developments not built. Student generation rate lower perhaps due to Student generation rate lower perhaps due to

families with children moving to less expensive families with children moving to less expensive housing – families that can afford higher priced housing – families that can afford higher priced housing may have fewer children or older children.housing may have fewer children or older children.

State projection method is heavily weighted on State projection method is heavily weighted on recent enrollment.recent enrollment.

4444


THE THE PERFECT STORM - Fontana Unified School DistrictPERFECT STORM - Fontana Unified School District

Funding, site issues, and approval timeframes mean schools Funding, site issues, and approval timeframes mean schools haven’t been built for the enrollment increases occurring up haven’t been built for the enrollment increases occurring up until 2004/05.until 2004/05.

Declining enrollment over the last 2 years has now reduced Declining enrollment over the last 2 years has now reduced eligibility, but new schools are still needed to reduce eligibility, but new schools are still needed to reduce overcrowding and accommodate past growth.overcrowding and accommodate past growth.

Local funding is now available for the 50% match due to g/o Local funding is now available for the 50% match due to g/o bonds and CFD COP’s, but State funding is not availability bonds and CFD COP’s, but State funding is not availability because of a lack of grant eligibility.because of a lack of grant eligibility.

With out local funding there is not sufficient funding to With out local funding there is not sufficient funding to accomplish all needed projects.accomplish all needed projects.

4545


What could increase SFP Grant What could increase SFP Grant Eligibility?Eligibility?

(1)(1)Most important: Increase CBEDS Most important: Increase CBEDS enrollmentenrollment

(2)(2) Increases in tentative tract maps Increases in tentative tract maps approved for new developmentsapproved for new developments

4646


What strategies can we work on to gain SFPWhat strategies can we work on to gain SFPGrant Eligibility?Grant Eligibility? Increase student CBEDS enrollment next 2 yearsIncrease student CBEDS enrollment next 2 years Apply for State funding before occupancy – giving Apply for State funding before occupancy – giving

time for enrollment to increase during constructiontime for enrollment to increase during construction Investigate feasibility of enrollment projections by Investigate feasibility of enrollment projections by

High School Attendance Areas to address high High School Attendance Areas to address high growth areas showing enrollment increasesgrowth areas showing enrollment increases

Review and rescind projects for which funding has Review and rescind projects for which funding has been received that are currently on hold or for been received that are currently on hold or for which funding has expired. Reclaim unused grants which funding has expired. Reclaim unused grants to reduce negative eligibility and potentially use to to reduce negative eligibility and potentially use to claim State funding for priority projects.claim State funding for priority projects.

4747


facilities work session fontana unified school district 05.09.07

Documents

mfacilities work session

schoolfacilities work

fundingfacilities work

parents of fontana

high schools

facilities review

student transportation

target issuance