facilities condition assessment qualcomm st ... qualcomm stadium qualcomm stadium facilities...

Download Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm St ... Qualcomm Stadium Qualcomm Stadium Facilities Condition

Post on 13-Jul-2020




0 download

Embed Size (px)


  • Facilities Condition Assessment

    Qualcomm Stadium

    Facilities Condition Assessment

    Qualcomm Stadium

    Facilities Condition Assessment AECOM San Diego, California April 2011

  • Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm Stadium

         

    Qualcomm Stadium Facilities Condition Assessment Table of Contents The Qualcomm Stadium Condition Assessment was conducted from December 6, 2010 through December 10, 2010. The assessment was conducted with architectural, mechanical, electrical, technology and structural engineering disciplines represented. This document contains the results of the assessment and includes the following:

     Introduction and Methodology 1

    An explanation of the approach for the assessment Summary of Findings 3

    Discipline Summary 3 Cross Tab of Requirements by System by Priority 4 Cross Tab of Requirements by Category by Priority 4

    Overview of Assessed Buildings 5

    Overview 5 Assessment Findings 7

    Facility Condition Assessment Detail Reports 7 Summary of Findings 9 Supporting Photos 53

    Appendix A Soft Cost Model Assumptions A1-1 Tier 1 Seismic Assessment A2-1


  • Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm Stadium

         


  • Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm Stadium

         

    Qualcomm Stadium Facilities Condition Assessment Introduction and Methodology

    This report contains the results of a Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) of the buildings and structures that encompass Qualcomm Stadium. Comprehensive Analysis As part of a comprehensive facility condition assessment, specific site and building related requirements were identified, categorized by type, and grouped into one of thirteen major building systems. Subsequently, a detailed cost estimate for each correction was prepared including construction costs as well as San Diego, California related “soft costs” that account for design and engineering professional fees, contingencies, escalation, and administrative expense (for a detailed analysis of soft cost factors refer to the appendix.) Additionally, all requirements were prioritized to assign a relative level of importance and assist in determining an appropriate level of annual funding across all buildings. For the assessment, the following priority definitions were used:  Priority One: Mission Critical Concerns - Requirements or conditions directly

    affect the facility’s ability to remain operational.  Priority Two: Issues that directly impact the operation of the facility - Items

    assessed that, if not addressed in the near term, may progress to a priority one item.

     Priority Three: Short Term Conditions - These items are needs that are necessary to the function of the facility, but may not require immediate attention.

     Priority Four: Long Term Requirements - Items or systems observed which are likely to require attention within the next five years, or would be considered an enhancement to the facility.

    A Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) can be used for:  Identification of immediate facilities needs or mission critical facility items;  Prioritization of short and long term needs across a range of facility types;  Justification for major renovations and in some cases building replacement;  Determination of capital renewal or replacement needs for building systems that are

    projected to reach the end of their useful life in the next ten years; and  Supporting capital planning and annual budgets

    The total current requirements for all assessment site and building locations, in 2011 construction cost dollars, are estimated at $79,786,725. The assessment effort employed professionals from several disciplines. These included:  Structural - Assessed structural integrity, seismic compliance, aesthetic issues  Information Technology - Assessed telephones, main point of entry, cable riser

    system, network truck bays, field communication boxes, E-TV room, TV monitors, audio system, video display systems, CCTV head-end system, CCTV cameras

     Architectural – Assessed finishes, doors, paving, concrete walks, windows, seating, roofing, conveyances (stairs and elevators), accessories (railings, signage)

     Electrical – Assessed lighting, distribution, generators, electrical service  Mechanical – Assessed heating, ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing service,

    plumbing fixtures


  • Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm Stadium

         


  • Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm Stadium

         

    Qualcomm Stadium Facilities Condition Assessment Summary of Findings

    Discipline Summary The following list depicts the most significant requirements by assessment discipline. Where possible, costs have been associated within the assessment data to account for correcting these conditions.  Structural

     Spalled concrete  Concrete patching  Resurfacing and bracing of steel field bleachers  Main stadium seating column shear and axial load limitations for the 6’-1”

    long walls/columns  Inadequate moment capacity for weak axis bending in the stadium lighting

    ring support  Column steel lap length and tie spacing limitations for the main stadium

    support columns  Information Technology

     Congested cable riser system  Inoperable connection points in truck bays  Approaching capacity of bandwidth of E-TV system required for new

    technology  Congested wiring in E-TV room  Out of date Jumbo-Tron video display  Limited, dated CCTV head-end system  Inoperable analog CCTV cameras

     Architectural  Concrete paving at Plaza Level  “Outer-ring” roofing  Parking lot paving  Expansion joints  Site drainage

     Electrical  Lighting replacement  Power centers  Additional circuitry and receptacles

     Mechanical  Sewer piping replacement  Grease trap flow control  Hot water storage  HVAC controls


  • Facilities Condition Assessment Qualcomm Stadium

         

    Cross Tab of Current Requirements The following chart summarizes the current requirements for all the buildings on the site in a cross tab that shows the buildings systems on the left, and the priority of the requirements across the top, with Priority 1 accounting for the most urgent items. Crosstab by Priority by System

    Building System 1 2 3 4 Total

    Site -$ 124$ 13,848,630$ 3,249,908$ 17,098,662$

    Roofing -$ 284,147$ -$ -$ 284,147$

    Structural -$ 42,166$ 2,219,299$ -$ 2,261,465$

    Exterior -$ 632,460$ 13,398$ 28,873$ 674,731$

    Interior -$ 2,248,637$ 239,824$ 1,409,856$ 3,898,317$

    Mechanical -$ 14,962,856$ 2,918,247$ 275,413$ 18,156,516$

    Electrical 1,546$ 8,775,883$ 124,521$ 25,000$ 8,926,949$

    Plumbing -$ 12,495,350$ 3,076$ 459,417$ 12,957,843$

    Fire and Life Safety -$ 2,800,000$ -$ -$ 2,800,000$

    Technology -$ -$ 9,860,000$ 200,000$ 10,060,000$

    Conveyances -$ 171,001$ -$ -$ 171,001$

    Specialties -$ 49,307$ 994,111$ 8,676$ 1,052,094$

    Equipment -$ 1,445,000$ -$ -$ 1,445,000$

    Total (Present Value) 1,546$ 43,906,930$ 30,221,106$ 5,657,144$ 79,786,725$

    Facility Condition Assessment Priority

    All requirements have been further categorized according to the type of condition observed. Required Maintenance items are those items that have broken or are in need of repair prior to reaching the end of life term. Capital Renewal items are those current requirements that have reached or exceeded their useful or serviceable life. Code Compliance issues are those requirements that are building code related. A Functional Requirement relates to an item that is presently not in place, or may not be functioning correctly and should be added to the building.

    Crosstab by Priority by Category

    Category 1 2 3 4 Total

    Maintenance -$


View more >