~~f - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

108
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO BERKELEY• DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE •SAN DIEGO• SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT VICE CHANCELLOR CAMPUS ARCHITECT - FACILITIES DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION TEL: (858) 534-2177 FAX: (858) 534-4363 WWW.FDC.UCSD.EDU April 20, 2017 TO: ALL HOLDERS OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT UNNERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO PROJECT NO.: 4746/A4L-440/966025 Enclosed are the following: SANTA BARBARA •SANT A CRUZ 9500 GILMAN DRIVE #916 LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093-0916 1. Addendum No. 1 dated April 20, 2017 to the Construction Documents. 2. Revised Advertisement for Bids dated April 20, 2017 3. Revised Section 262324 dated April 20, 2017 4. Revised Drawing Sheets E7.02 and E8.01 dated April 18, 2017 5. University Responses to Requests for Information 6. Geotechnical Investigation dated November 17, 2014 7. Environmental Soils Testing dated November 18, 2014 NOTE: THE BID DATE HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO 2:00 P.M., THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017. Sincerely, James R. Gillie Senior Director of Construction Services Facilities Design and Construction Enclosures

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

BERKELEY• DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE •SAN DIEGO• SAN FRANCISCO

OFFICE OF THE ASSIST ANT VICE CHANCELLOR CAMPUS ARCHITECT - FACILITIES DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION TEL: (858) 534-2177 FAX: (858) 534-4363 WWW.FDC.UCSD.EDU

April 20, 2017

TO: ALL HOLDERS OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT UNNERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO PROJECT NO.: 4746/A4L-440/966025

Enclosed are the following:

SANT A BARBARA •SANT A CRUZ

9500 GILMAN DRIVE #916 LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093-0916

1. Addendum No. 1 dated April 20, 2017 to the Construction Documents.

2. Revised Advertisement for Bids dated April 20, 2017

3. Revised Section 262324 dated April 20, 2017

4. Revised Drawing Sheets E7.02 and E8.01 dated April 18, 2017

5. University Responses to Requests for Information

6. Geotechnical Investigation dated November 17, 2014

7. Environmental Soils Testing dated November 18, 2014

NOTE: THE BID DATE HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO 2:00 P.M., THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017.

Sincerely,

~~F James R. Gillie Senior Director of Construction Services Facilities Design and Construction

Enclosures

Page 2: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO PROJECT NO.: 4746/A4L-440/966025

UCSD - FD&C Page 1 of 1

ADDENDUM NO. ONE TO THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS April 20, 2017 General:

The following changes, additions or deletions shall be made to the following documents; all other conditions shall remain the same. I. SPECIFICATIONS Item#

1. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Page 1 of 2, delete the sentence that reads: “Sealed bids for the Lump Sum Base

Bid will not be accepted after 2:00 P.M., Thursday, April 27, 2017”, and substitute the following sentence:

“Sealed bids for the Lump Sum Base Bid will not be accepted after 2:00 P.M.,

Thursday, May 4, 2017.” 6. SECTION 262324, PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR Delete Section 262324 Paralleling Medium-Voltage Switchgear and substitute with

the enclosed new Section 262324 Paralleling Medium-Voltage Switchgear dated 4/19/2017.

II DRAWINGS Item# 1. Delete Sheets E7.02 and E8.01 and substitute with the enclosed revised Sheets

E7.02 and E8.01 dated 4/18/2017. III. CLARIFICATION Item#

1. University Responses to Requests for Information.

2. Geotechnical Investigation dated November 17, 2014 3. Environmental Soils Testing dated November 18, 2014

Page 3: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT Project No.: 4746/A4L-440/966025 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

April 4, 2016 Advertisement for Bids (FDC Rev. 9/20/16) Revised April 20, 2017 – Addendum 1 LF:AFB 1

ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Subject to conditions prescribed by the University of California, San Diego, sealed bids for a lump-sum contract are invited for the following work:

SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Project Number: 4746/A4L-440/966025 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Provide a new emergency power system for Scripps Institute of Oceanography comprising of (1) 4MW generator, the associated paralleling switchgear and a 12kV Substation. Estimated project duration is 250 calendar days. Procedures: Bidding documents will be available at Thursday, March 30, 2017. To order plans and specifications or for a list of planholders go to: http://reprohaus.net. For additional information go to: www.fdc.ucsd.edu There is no charge for the Bid Documents which will be made available to the prequalified bidders. Only prequalified bidders will be allowed to submit a Bid on this project. The following bidders have been prequalified to bid on this project:

Baker Electric Morrow-Meadows Corporation

Neal Electric Inc. Bids will be received only at:

University of California, San Diego Facilities Design & Construction

10280 N. Torrey Pines Road, Suite 465 La Jolla, CA 92093

Bid Deadline: Sealed bids must be received on or before 2:00 P.M., THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2017. The bids will be opened at approximately 2:10 P.M. MANDATORY PRE-BID CONFERENCE A MANDATORY Pre-Bid Conference/Job Walk will be conducted on THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2017, beginning promptly at 10:00 A.M. Only bidders who participate in the Pre-Bid Conference/Job Walk in its entirety will be allowed to bid on the Project as prime contractors. Participants shall meet at Deep Sea Drilling East, Scripps Institute of Oceanography. For directions to the Pre-Bid Conference/Job Walk contact Rosalie Pham at [email protected] or 858.534.5343. UC San Diego maps can be found at http://maps.ucsd.edu. Attendees should plan to arrive in ample time to secure parking prior to the scheduled meeting time.

Page 4: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT Project No.: 4746/A4L-440/966025 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

April 4, 2016 Advertisement for Bids (FDC Rev. 9/20/16) Revised April 20, 2017 – Addendum 1 LF:AFB 2

Bid Security in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the Lump Sum Base Bid, excluding alternates, shall accompany each Bid. The Surety issuing the Bid Bond shall be, on the Bid Deadline, listed in the latest published State of California, Department of Insurance, list of Insurers Admitted to Transact Surety Insurance in This State. The successful Bidder will be required to have the following California current and active contractor's license at the time of submission of the Bid: Electrical Contractor, C10, with either General Engineering, A, or General Building, B. UC San Diego encourages the participation of Small, Disadvantaged, Minority-owned, Women-owned and Service/Disabled Veteran-owned Business Enterprises (S/D/M/W/DVBE’s) and is committed to promote a diverse pool of firms for our building programs. Every effort will be made to ensure that all persons have equal access to contracts and other business opportunities with the University within the limits imposed by law or University policy. Each Bidder may be required to show evidence of its equal employment opportunity policy. The successful Bidder and its subcontractors will be required to follow the nondiscrimination requirements set forth in the Bidding Documents and to pay prevailing wage at the location of the work.

The work described in the contract is a public work subject to section 1771 of the California Labor Code. No contractor or subcontractor, regardless of tier, may be listed on a Bid for, or engage in the performance of, any portion of this project, unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 and 1771.1. Contractors and subcontractors must use the DIR’s upgraded electronic certified payroll reporting (eCPR) system to furnish certified payroll records (CPRs) to the Labor Commissioner. Contractors and subcontractors who have been submitting PDF copies of their CPRs for earlier projects must also begin using the new system. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS MUST BE REGISTERED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (DIR) AT BID TIME. Go to http://www.dir.ca.gov/public-works/publicworks.html for more information and to register. The successful Bidder shall pay all persons providing construction services and/or any labor on site, including any University location, no less than the UC Fair Wage (defined as $14 per hour as of 10/1/16, and $15 per hour as of 10/1/17) and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local working condition requirements. Estimated construction cost: $5,500,000 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA University of California, San Diego MARCH 2017

Page 5: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 1 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

SECTION 26 23 24 - PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR

PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 SUMMARY

A. Section Includes: Metal-enclosed, medium-voltage, circuit-breaker switchgear rated 15KV and associated monitoring and control systems for paralleling standby/emergency generators on an isolated bus and for distributing electrical power in AC systems. It will include the following features:

1. Copper, silver-plated main bus at connection points and Copper, tin-plated main bus

2. MV Vacuum Circuit breakers 3. Communication modules. 4. Meters 5. Analog instruments. 6. Relays. 7. Control switches 8. Surge arresters. 9. Provisions for future devices. 10. Fungus proofing. 11. Control battery system, battery charger. 12. Mimic bus.

B. Related Requirements:

1. Section 26 05 13 "Medium-Voltage Cables" for requirements of terminating cables

2. Section 26 05 26 “Grounding and Bonding For Electrical Systems”. 3. Section 26 05 33 “Identification for Electrical Systems” 4. Section 26 05 48.16 "Seismic Controls for Electrical Systems." 5. Section 26 05 73 “Overcurrent Protective Device Coordination Study” 6. Section 26 09 13 "Electrical Power Monitoring and Control" for interfacing

communication and metering requirements. Note: this equipment is to be integrated into the existing SEL Powermax SCADA system.

7. Section 26 32 13 "Engine Generators" for individual generator protection, synchronization, and standalone multiple-generator starting controllers.

C. References:

1. ANSI Standard C37.20.2, Metal-Clad and Station Type Cubicle Switchgear. 2. ANSI Standard C37.04, Rating Structure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers

Rated on a Symmetrical Current Basis.

Page 6: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 2 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

3. ANSI Standard C37.06, American National Standard for Switchgear - AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Symmetrical Current Basis - Preferred Ratings and Related Required Capabilities

1.2 DEFINITIONS

A. ATS: Acceptance Testing Specification.

B. DDC: Direct digital control.

C. GFCI: Ground fault circuit interrupter.

D. HMI: Human Machine Interface

E. Legally Required: As used in this Section, it shall have the same meaning as used in NFPA 70.

F. NETA: InterNational Electrical testing Association.

G. SCADA: Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition.

1.3 ACTION SUBMITTALS

A. Product Data: For each type of paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

1. Include manufacturer’s technical data on features, performance, electrical characteristics, ratings, and finishes for programmable logic controllers, instrumentation, control devices, monitoring devices, SCADA interface devices, and display components.

2. Manufacturer’s catalog cuts for each equipment, device, component including meters, CTs, PTs, switches etc.

3. Include rated capacities, operating characteristics, furnished specialties, factory settings, and accessories for individual circuit breakers.

4. Include time-current characteristic curves for overcurrent protective devices.

B. Shop Drawings: Shop drawings prepared by the factory engineer for each type of paralleling medium-voltage switchgear and associated equipment, shall include the following information:

1. Include dimensioned plans to scale (1/4”=1’-0”), elevations, sections, details, shipping sections, weights of each assembled section, and required clearances and service space around equipment.

2. Include tabulation of installed devices with features and ratings; bill of materials 3. Include enclosure types and details. 4. Detail locations for anchor bolts and leveling channels. 5. Show bus configuration with current rating, size, and number of conductors in

each bus run, including phase, neutral, and ground conductors of main and branch buses.

Page 7: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 3 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

a. Drawing of cable termination compartments showing preferred locations for conduits and indicating space available for cable terminations.

6. Bus structure diagram: For each equipment, provide bus structure diagram with minimum scale ¾”=1’-0”. Provide single line diagram using standard ANSI symbols.

7. Include voltage characteristics 8. Indicate bus bracing. 9. Indicate short-time and short-circuit current rating of switchgear assembly. 10. Include features, characteristics, ratings, and factory settings of individual

overcurrent protective devices and auxiliary components. Indicate momentary and interrupting rating of each circuit breaker in RMS Symmetrical amperes (AIC). AIC shall be based on maximum available fault level.

11. Relay controls and metering. 12. Detail nameplate legends. 13. Include mimic-bus diagram. 14. Include three-line power wiring diagrams for paralleling medium voltage

switchgear, breakers, generators, and related equipment showing device terminal numbers.

15. Include point-to-point schematic control, monitoring, and alarm wiring diagrams showing internal component terminal numbers. Differentiate between manufacturer installed and field installed wiring.

16. Include point-to point schematic control, monitoring, and alarm wiring diagrams for external components indicating terminal numbers for the following:

a. Engine generator. b. Other load-control devices. c. SCADA remote terminal unit. Note the paralleling feature must be

integrated into the existing SEL Powermax system. d. Diagram showing Fiber optic (FO) cable connection for data service to

main SCADA patch panel and main meters. Include site drawing showing the underground route of main FO cable.

C. Samples: Representative portion of mimic bus with specified finish. Manufacturer's color charts showing colors available for mimic bus.

D. Delegated-Design Submittal: For paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

1. Include design calculations, signed and sealed by a California Registered qualified professional engineer, for selecting seismic restraints and for structural analysis of outdoor enclosures, including wind loading.

2. Battery calculations prepared by switchgear or battery manufacturer.

E. Sequence of Operation: Description of sequence of operation for paralleling controls in automatic, manual, system test, and peak-shaving modes.

1. Include the following in the description of the automatic-mode sequence of operation:

Page 8: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 4 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

a. Programmed sequence of initial generator starting and connection of generators to the isolated paralleling bus, including a description of how the proposed design complies with the requirements for redundancy.

b. Programmed sequence of transferring loads to the isolated paralleling bus based on operator-adjustable preset priorities and preset loads. Include initial load settings.

c. Programmed sequence of starting and stopping generator based on actual real-time measured loads.

d. Programmed sequence of sending a load-shed signal tomedium voltage feeder circuit breakers, and to other devices when the generator frequency does not return to the normal frequency within the adjustable time period.

e. Programmed sequence of stopping the generator based on no other device sending a start signal.

f. Description of sequence of operation for paralleling controls.

2. Include the following in the description of the system testing mode sequence of operation: (See Sheet E0.02 Generator Test Mode for recommended sequence)

a. Full Load. b. No load.

3. Paralleling Switchgear Redundancy: Identify any single points of failure.

1.4 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS

A. Coordination Drawings:

1. Floor plans to scale (1/4”=1’-0”) showing dimensioned layout, required working clearances, and required area above and around paralleling medium-voltage switchgear where pipe and ducts are prohibited.

2. Switchgear layout and relationships between components and adjacent structural and mechanical elements.

3. Support locations, type of support, and weight on each support. Indicate field measurements.

B. Qualification Data: For testing and inspection agency.

C. Installation instructions.

D. Seismic Qualification Certificates: For paralleling medium-voltage switchgear, overcurrent protective devices, accessories, and components to withstand seismic forces defined in Section 26 05 48.16 "Seismic Controls for Electrical Systems." Include the following:

1. Basis of Certification: Indicate whether withstand certification is based on actual test of assembled components or on calculation.

2. Dimensioned Outline Drawings of Equipment Unit: Identify center of gravity and locate and describe mounting and anchorage provisions.

3. Detailed description of equipment anchorage devices on which the certification is based and their installation requirements.

Page 9: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 5 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

E. Source quality-control reports.

1. Certified written reports signed by factory testing engineer or technician including their name and review comments from the testing engineer. Each report shall include date, location of tests and actual test data. Submit within two weeks of completion of factory tests prior to shipment of switchgear from the factory.

2. Refer to section 26 13 26 for additional information on MV Circuit Breaker testing by the manufacturer.

F. Field quality-control reports.

1. Submit within two weeks of completion of field tests. 2. Report shall include the name, signature of the testing technician, supervisor,

their review comments and procedures used for testing.

G. Sample Warranty: For manufacturer's special warranty.

1.5 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

A. Updated mimic bus diagram reflecting field changes after final switchgear load connections have been made, for record.

B. Operation and Maintenance Data: For paralleling medium-voltage switchgear and components to include in emergency, operation, and maintenance manuals.

1. In addition to items specified in Section 01 78 23 "Operation and Maintenance Data," include the following:

a. Manufacturer's written instructions for sequence of operation. b. Manufacturer's system checklists, maintenance schedule, and

maintenance log sheets complying with NFPA 110. c. Manufacturer's written instructions for testing and adjusting relays. d. Time-current curves, including selectable ranges for each type of

overcurrent protective device.

1.6 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS

A. Furnish extra materials that match products installed and that are packaged with protective covering for storage and identified with labels describing contents.

1. Control Power Fuses: Six of each type and rating used. Include spares for the following:

a. Potential transformers. b. Control power circuits.

2. Indicating Lights: Six of each type installed.

Page 10: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 6 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

3. Draw-out Circuit Breakers: One of each type and rating used for circuit breaker in the paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

B. Maintenance Tools: Furnish tools and miscellaneous items required for paralleling medium-voltage switchgear test, inspection, maintenance, and operation. Include the following:

1. Floor-running transport or dockable dolly with lifting mechanism and all other items necessary to remove circuit breaker from housing and transport it to remote location. Provide a factory built enclosure as part of the outdoor switchgear line-up to store the floor running dockable dolly. Enclosure shall have hinged door with stainless steel hardware and be padlockable and have proper front access at site. Breaker lifting device shall be suitable for lifting/handling PTs also in installed location.

2. Racking handle to move circuit breaker manually between connected and disconnected positions.

3. Provide special tools required. 4. Provide insulated handles, tools designed for pulling fuses. 5. Provide two racking and charging handles. 6. Provide two keys for door locks per section.

1.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE

A. Regulatory Requirements: Construct equipment conforming to ANSI and NEMA standards.

B. American made products have been acceptable to the University. If non-domestic products are submitted, notice is hereby given that extensive testing shall be required to insure quality and conformance to the Specifications. Testing shall be done by a recognized lab acceptable to the University and all tests shall be witnessed by University’s personnel. All testing procedures and test results shall be satisfactory to the University. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging the tests, for transportation, food and lodging for minimum of one University’s representative to witness the test at the testing lab. Include all costs for the above in the bid.

C. Contractor shall ensure that the manufacturer has a minimum of 15 years’ experience in the production of Medium Voltage Switchgear similar to the type and size specified in this project. Furnish a list of minimum three (3) installations with similar equipment completed within the last five (5) years. Include name, email and telephone number of the University’s facility engineer for each installation.

D. Manufacturer shall have ISO 9001 Certification.

E. Manufacturer shall have ability to readily provide replacement parts for a minimum period of ten (10) years, from the date of completion of the project.

F. Switchgear shall be assembled at the manufacturer’s own manufacturing facility using its own devices (e.g., circuit breakers, bus) for the assembly. These devices shall be normally carried by the manufacturer as standard catalog items.

Page 11: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 7 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

G. Provide certified test reports of shake table test done by the switchgear manufacturer on similar units.

H. Materials and equipment shall be new, modern in design and shall not have been in prior service except as required by factory tests. Major components (e.g., primary switch, transformer, and switchboard) shall be manufactured within six months of installation.

I. Source Limitations: Obtain switchgear through one source from a single manufacturer. All power distribution equipment shall be of a single manufacturer.

J. Comply with IEEE C2.

K. Comply with IEEE C37. 20.

L. Comply with NFPA 70.

M. Testing Agency Qualifications:

1. Testing Agency Qualifications: Testing agency shall be an independent company with the experience and capability to conduct field testing indicated; shall have been a member of International Testing Association (NETA) for a minimum of last ten (10) years.

2. The company shall have permanent in-house testing engineers and technicians on its staff

3. Testing company shall be located with 50 miles radius of the project. 4. Testing Agency's Field Supervisor: Currently certified by NETA to supervise on-

site testing to supervise on-site testing specified in Part 3. 5. Field Testing technician and supervisor shall have minimum ten (10) years’

experience in field testing of MV Paralleling Switchgear, Circuit Breakers similar to the type and rating specified on this project.

N. Product Options: Drawings indicate size, profiles, and dimensional requirements of switchgear and are based on the specific system indicated. Refer to Section 01 60 00 "Product Requirements."

O. Electrical Components, Devices, and Accessories: UL Listed and labeled as defined in NFPA 70, Article 100, and marked for intended use.

1.8 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

A. Deliver paralleling medium-voltage switchgear in prefabricated walk-in weatherproof enclosure to the designated site. .

B. Store paralleling medium-voltage switchgear indoors in clean dry space with uniform temperature to prevent condensation prior to on site installation. Protect switchgear from exposure to dirt, fumes, water, corrosive substances, and physical damage.

Page 12: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 8 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

C. If stored in areas subjected to weather, cover switchgear to provide protection from weather, dirt, dust, corrosive substances, and physical damage. Remove loose packing and flammable materials from inside switchgear; install electric heating (250 W per section) to prevent condensation.

D. Follow manufacturer’s recommendations for proper storage of switchgear.

1.9 FIELD CONDITIONS

A. Installation Pathway: Remove and replace building components and structures to provide pathway for moving paralleling medium-voltage switchgear into place.

B. Interruption of Existing Electrical Service: Do not interrupt electrical service to facilities occupied by University or others unless permitted under the following conditions and then only after arranging to provide temporary electrical service according to requirements indicated:

1. Notify University Representative no fewer than fourteen days in advance of proposed interruption of electrical service.

2. Do not proceed with interruption of electrical service without University’s written permission.

C. Environmental Limitations: Rate equipment for continuous operation at indicated ampere ratings for the following conditions:

1. Ambient temperature not exceeding 104 deg F 2. Altitude of 1000 feet above sea level.

1.10 COORDINATION

A. Coordinate layout and installation of switchgear and components with other construction that penetrates ceilings or is supported by them, including conduit, piping, equipment, and adjacent surfaces. Maintain required clearances for workspace and equipment access doors and panels.

B. Coordinate size and location of concrete bases. Concrete, reinforcement, and formwork requirements are specified with concrete.

1.11 WARRANTY

A. Manufacturer's Warranty: Manufacturer agrees to repair or replace paralleling equipment that fails in materials or workmanship within specified warranty period. Warranty shall cover on-site repairs and replacements of defective components by manufacturer’s filed service technicians within 24 hrs. of reporting by University.

1. Warranty Period: Two year(s) from date of Substantial Completion.

Page 13: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 9 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

2. Warranty on Batteries: Minimum ten (10) years from the date of substantial completion.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

A. Electrical Components, Devices, and Accessories: UL Listed and labeled as defined in NFPA 70, by a qualified testing agency, and marked for intended location and application.

B. Product Selection for Restricted Space: Drawings indicate maximum dimensions for paralleling Medium-voltage switchgear, including clearances between paralleling switchgear and adjacent surfaces and other items. Comply with indicated maximum dimensions.

C. The generator paralleling monitoring and control panel in the paralleling medium-voltage switchgear shall monitor and control the following emergency/standby power system components:

1. Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear. 2. Single-generator monitoring and control system. 3. Single-generator paralleling monitoring and control systems that are part of the

paralleling medium-voltage switchgear. 4. Engine generator. 5. Other load-control devices. 6. Distribution circuit breakers in paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

D. Redundant Standby Power System:

1. Single generator with associated single-generator paralleling monitoring and control system.

2. Black-start controller with no single point of failure. 3. 4. Generator paralleling monitoring and control system shall automatically be

performed by a backup system without degradation in the event that primary system fails to function for any reason (such as component failure or off-line maintenance), except for the following manually operated functions:

a. Load management. b. Peak shaving.

E. Sequence of Operation for Normal Conditions:

1. Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear, including controlled generator, and controlled circuit breakers shall be in the automatic position and ready to operate on loss of power or other designated initiation conditions. a. Generator paralleling monitoring and control system.

Page 14: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 10 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

F. Sequence of Operation for Loss of Normal Power Conditions:

1. The single-generator monitoring and control system shall receive a start signal from a redundant system.

a. Start signal may come from a device directly wired to start the engine generator.

b.

2. On receiving a start signal, the single-generator monitoring and control system shall start the engine generator and achieve rated voltage and frequency.

3. If engine generator fails to start, after expiration of over-crank time delay, engine generator shuts down and alarm is initiated.

4. Black-Start Control: Prevent out-of-phase paralleling. After the generator achieves 90 percent rated voltage and frequency, inhibit the connection of -controlled circuit breakers to the isolated paralleling bus, then close the circuit breaker connecting the generator to the isolated paralleling bus.

a. Comply with requirements in Section 26 32 13 "Engine Generators" for selection of the engine generator to connect to the isolated paralleling bus.

5. The single-generator paralleling monitoring and control system synchronizes its associated engine generator and allows closure of respective generator paralleling medium-voltage circuit breakers to the isolated paralleling bus.

6. Failure of an Engine Generator to Synchronize: If engine generator fails to synchronize, sound an alarm after a preset time delay, but continue to attempt to synchronize the engine generator until signaled to stop by manual operation.

G. Priority Controller Sequence of Operation:

1. Programming from Human-Machine Interface for Priority Controller:

a. Set priority blocks of load that indicate priority number and scheduled size of load from the Priority-Load Schedule, which is to be configured in the SEL Powermax SCADA system. Set generator blocks of capacity that prevents the individual engine generator from exceeding its capacity.

b. The signal to transfer loads to the engine generator source may be accomplished by one of the following:

1) Signaling to transfer-inhibit enable the feeder medium voltage circuit breaker associated with the priority load to transfer the load.

2) Signaling the load-add relay at the feeder medium voltage circuit breaker to transfer the priority load.

3) Closing the distribution-feeder medium voltage circuit breaker associated with the priority load.

4) Enabling another device. 2. When generator capacity is adequate to support next priority load, send signal to

transfer next priority load to generator source until all priority loads have been transferred.

Page 15: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 11 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

H. System Test Sequence of Operation: (see drawing E0.02 for generator test mode)

1. If there is an outage during this mode of operation, automatically change to requirements specified in "Sequence of Operation for Loss of Normal Power Conditions" Paragraph, send load-shed signals to lower-priority loads until load is below generator capacity, signal engine generator to start, and cancel system test.

I. Comply with NFPA 110 for the following: 1. Optional Standby: EPSS Level 2, Type 60.

2.2 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

A. Seismic Performance: Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear shall withstand the effects of earthquake motions determined according to ASCE/SEI 7.

1. The term "withstand" means "the unit will remain in place without separation of any parts from the device when subjected to the seismic forces specified and the unit will be fully operational after the seismic event."

B. Structural Performance: Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear outdoor enclosures shall comply with locally adopted codes for gravity and wind loads.

C. On healthcare projects under OSHPD jurisdiction, switchgear and its components shall be certified by OSHPD and shall have a current valid OSHPD OSP certification number.

2.3 SINGLE-GENERATOR PARALLELING MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEM

A. Manufacturer: Subject to compliance with the requirements, provide products by one of the following:

1. Russellectric Inc. to match existing on the Campus.

B. Source Limitations: Obtain paralleling medium-voltage switchgear from same manufacturer as stipulated above.

C. Components and Devices: Factory mount in single-generator section of the metal-enclosed, paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

1. Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear door-mounted control devices shall be industrial oil-type devices. Indicator lamps shall be high-intensity digital display.

D. Control Power: Supply control power from the 48-V dc. Programmable Logic Controller: Factory-mounted controller, separate from the multiple-generator paralleling monitoring and control system in each single-generator paralleling monitoring and control module of the metal-enclosed, paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

Page 16: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 12 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

E. Single-Generator Paralleling Medium-Voltage Switchgear Circuit Breaker:

1. Factory mount the circuit-breaker control switch. 2. Paralleling Circuit-Breaker Monitor and Control:

a. Monitors circuit-breaker auxiliary contacts. b. Initiates fault signal if circuit breaker fails to close within adjustable time-

delay period (0.5 to 15 seconds). c. Trips open and locks out paralleling circuit breaker on paralleling circuit

breaker failure to close, until manually reset.

F. Generator Mode Selector Switch: Factory mounted in the single-generator paralleling monitoring and control system module of the metal-enclosed, paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

1. "Lockout/Reset" mode prevents generator from starting or immediately shuts down generator if running.

2. "Off/Cool-Down" mode stops engine after a cool-down period. 3. "Auto" mode allows generator to start on receipt of remote start signal. If the

generator is already running and there is not a start signal, then "Auto" mode allows engine to run for predetermined cool-down period before stopping.

4. "Test Off-Line" allows engine to start and run as if a start signal were received, except it does not allow generator to connect to the isolated paralleling bus unless a start signal is received.

5. "Test Online" allows the engine to start, run, and connect to the isolated paralleling bus as if a start signal were received.

G. Engine Generator Controller: Woodward compatible.

1. Factory mount governor (speed control and load sharing) supplied in Section 26 32 13 "Engine Generators" in single-generator monitoring and control module.

2. Loading control interface to the governor system. 3. Automatic synchronizer.

H. Automatic Synchronizer:

1. Include sync mode selector switch with RUN-OFF-CHECK-PERMISSIVE positions. In RUN mode, enable active synchronization and sync-check function. In CHECK mode, perform the sync-check function. In PERMISSIVE mode, annunciate when generator and bus are synchronized but do not allow breaker closure.

a. Include discrete inputs in synchronizer to switch to each mode.

2. Bias the generator speed and voltage to match the paralleling isolated bus. 3. If the automatic synchronizer receives a permissive signal to allow closure to the

paralleling isolated bus and the generator is within synchronizing limits, send a close signal to the single-generator paralleling circuit breaker.

Page 17: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 13 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

I. Sync-switch, removable, keyed T-handle.

J. "Engine Generator Synchronized" Indication: Indicator lamp or digital-display indication of synchronization.

K. Voltage and Frequency Raise and Lower Switches: Allow plus or minus 5 percent adjustment when engine generator is operating but is not connected to the isolated paralleling bus.

L. Control and Reset Push Button: Have flashing lamp to indicate generator is locked out due to fault condition.

M. Lamp Test Push Button: Simultaneously tests all lamps on panel.

N. Control Panel Illumination: DC lamps illuminate panel when lighting from surrounding environment is unavailable.

O. Emergency Stop Push Button: Red mushroom-head switch maintains its position until manually reset.

P. Alarm and Status Indicating Display:

1. Status and Alarm Indications:

a. Status, Light Only (Nonlatching):

1) Generator mode selector switch not in auto (red). 2) Generator mode selector switch in auto (green). 3) Start signal received (green). 4) Emergency stop activated (red). 5) Demand mode standby (green). 6) Timing for start (green). 7) Timing for shutdown (green). 8) Generator circuit breaker closed (red). 9) Generator circuit breaker open (green).

a) Generator circuit breaker locked out (white). b) Generator circuit breaker racked out (white)

10) Remote generator breaker is open (red). 11) Engine stopped (green). 12) Time-delay start (green). 13) Engine running (red). 14) Engine cool-down (green).

b. Pre-Alarm, Light and Horn (Nonlatching):

1) Pre-high coolant temperature (amber). 2) Pre-low oil pressure (amber). 3) Low coolant temperature (amber).

Page 18: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 14 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

4) Engine low battery (amber). 5) Battery charger failure (amber). 6) Auxiliary power failure (amber). 7) Low fuel-day tank (amber). 8) Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear generator breaker failed to

close (amber). 9) Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear generator breaker failed to

open (amber). 10) Overcurrent alarm (amber). 11) Day tank low-fuel alarm (amber). 12) Ground-fault alarm (amber).

c. Shutdown Alarm, Light and Horn (Latching):

1) Engine overcrank (red). 2) Engine overspeed (red). 3) Engine low oil pressure (red). 4) Engine high coolant temperature (red). 5) Engine low coolant level (red). 6) Engine remote emergency shutdown (red). 7) Generator fail to synchronize shutdown (red). 8) Generator circuit breaker tripped (red). 9) Generator circuit breaker failure (red). 10) Generator not in auto (red). 11) Generator loss of field (red). 12) Generator reverse power (red). 13) Generator undervoltage (red). 14) Generator overvoltage (red). 15) Generator underfrequency (red). 16) Generator overfrequency (red). 17) Phase rotation (red). 18) Generator short circuit (red) 19) Day tank low-fuel shutdown (red). 20) Air damper activated, shutdown (red).

Q. Paralleling Controls and Protection:

1. Engine Generator Governor (Speed Control and Load Sharing): Comply with requirements in Section 26 32 13 "Engine Generators." Components shall be Woodward compatible.

2. Kilowatt Load Sharing Control and Interface:

a. Operates engine generator governors during synchronizing and provides isochronous load sharing when paralleled.

b. Allows engine generator to ramp up to kilowatt load level signaled by generator monitoring and control controller.

3. Load-Demand Governing Control:

Page 19: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 15 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

a. Causes engine generator to ramp down at an operator-adjustable rate to zero load when signaled to shut down in load-demand mode.

b. Causes engine generator to ramp up at an operator-adjustable rate to a proportional share of total isolated paralleling bus load when signaled to restart.

4. Kilovolt-Ampere-Reactive Load Sharing Control:

a. Operates alternator excitation system while engine generator is paralleled. b. Causes sharing of reactive load among engine generators to within

1 percent of equal levels without voltage drop.

5. Paralleling Monitor and Control:

a. Monitors and verifies that engine generator has reached 90 percent of nominal voltage and frequency before closing to the isolated paralleling bus.

b. Prevents accidental closure of the breaker with the engine generator out of phase with the bus.

c. Prevents out-of-phase closure to the isolated paralleling bus due to errant manual or automatic operation of synchronizer.

d. System of diagnostic digital displays to assist in analyzing synchronization.

6. Synchronizer Control:

a. Adjusts engine governor to match voltage, frequency, and phase angle of the isolated paralleling bus.

b. Maintains engine generator voltage within 1 percent of the isolated paralleling bus voltage, and phase angle within 20 electrical degrees of the isolated paralleling bus for 0.5 seconds before circuit-breaker closing.

c. Provides "fail-to-synchronize time delay" adjustable from 10 to 120 seconds; with field selectivity to either initiate alarm or shut down engine generator on failure condition.

7. Reverse Power Monitor and Control:

a. Prevents sustained reverse power flow in engine generator. b. Trips generator paralleling circuit breaker and initiates engine generator

shutdown when reverse power condition exceeds 10 percent of engine generator kilowatt for three seconds.

c. Trips generator paralleling circuit breaker and initiates engine generator shutdown when reverse kilovolt-ampere conditions exceeds 20 percent of generator kilovolt-ampere rating.

8. Phase Rotation Monitor and Control: Verifies engine generator and isolated paralleling bus phase rotation match prior to closing paralleling circuit breaker.

9. Electronic Alternator Overcurrent Alarm and Shutdown Control:

a. Monitors current flow at engine generator output terminals.

Page 20: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 16 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

b. Initiates alarm when load current on engine generator is more than 110 percent of rated current for more than 60 seconds.

c. Overcurrent shutdown function matched to thermal damage curve of alternator.

10. Electronic Alternator Short-Circuit Protection: Shuts down generator, without instantaneous-trip function, when load current is more than 175 percent of rated current and combined time/current approaches thermal damage curve of alternator.

11. Loss of Excitation Monitor: Displays alarm on single-generator paralleling monitoring and control panel when generator controls sense loss of excitation to alternator while paralleled to the isolated paralleling bus.

12. Cool-Down, Time-Delay Control: Adjustable, zero to 600 seconds. 13. Start Time-Delay Control: Adjustable, zero to 300 seconds. 14. Frequency Control: Initiate an alarm condition when engine generator is below 90

percent of rated frequency for more than 20 seconds or is over the frequency. 15. Under- and Overvoltage Control: Initiate an alarm condition when the engine

generator is at 90 percent voltage for more than 20 seconds or is over the voltage.

2.4 METAL-ENCLOSED, CIRCUIT-BREAKER SWITCHGEAR 12470V nominal, 15KV maximum

A. Manufacturer: Subject to compliance with the requirements, provide products by one of the following:

1. Square D by Schneider Electric. 2. Eaton Corporation 3. Or equal.

B. Source Limitations: Obtain paralleling medium-voltage switchgear from same manufacturer as required in 2.3 A. .

C. Description: Factory assembled and tested, and complying with IEEE C37.20.1 and UL 1558.

D. Ratings: Comply with IEEE C37.04. Suitable for application in three-phase, 60-Hz, systems. Refer to drawings for grounding information.

E. Nominal Interrupting-Capacity Class: 500 MVA.

F. Nominal System Voltage: 12470V three wire, 60 Hz.

G. Isolated Paralleling Bus: 1200 A continuous rating. Refer to drawings for bus rating. Note the 2000 amp bus is good for 43 MVA

1. Phase-, and Ground-Bus Materials:

a. Phase Bus: Copper, silver plated at connection points.

Page 21: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 17 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

b. Ground Bus: Copper plated; minimum size 1/4 by 2 inches.

2. Bus bars connect between vertical sections and between compartments. Cable connections are not permitted.

a. Uniform capacity for horizontal and vertical bus. b. Supports and Bracing for Buses: Adequate strength for indicated short-

circuit currents.

H. Short-Circuit Current: Match rating of highest-rated circuit breaker in switchgear assembly.

I. Switchgear Fabrication:

1. Bus isolation barriers shall be arranged to isolate line bus from load bus at each main and tie circuit breaker.

2. Circuit-breaker compartments shall be equipped to house Vacuum drawout-type circuit breakers and shall be fitted with hinged outer doors.

3. Auxiliary Compartments: Match and align with basic switchgear assembly.

a. Bus transition sections. b. Pull sections. c. Hinged front panels for access to accessory and blank compartments. d. Pull box on top of switchgear for extra room for pulling cable, with

removable top, front, and side covers; and ventilation provisions adequate to maintain air temperature in pull box within same limits as switchgear. 1) Bottom: Insulating, fire-resistive material with separate holes for

cable drops into switchgear. 2) Cable Supports: Arranged to ease cabling and adequate to support

cables indicated, including those for future installation. e. Provide for future extensions from either end of main phase, neutral, and

ground bus by means of predrilled bolt-holes and connecting links. f. Bus-Bar Insulation: Individual bus bars wrapped with factory-applied,

flame-retardant spray-applied, flame-retardant insulation.

1) Sprayed Insulation Thickness: 3 mils, minimum. 2) Bolted Bus Joints: Insulate with secure joint covers that can easily be

removed and reinstalled.

4. Circuit-Breaker Terminals for Cable Connections: Silver-plated copper bus extensions equipped with pressure connectors for conductors.

J. Circuit Breakers: Comply with IEEE C37.13, IEEE C37.16, and IEEE C37.17. Three pole single throw, electrically operated, drawout mounting units three individual vacuum sealed interrupter modules and include the following features:

1. Ratings: As indicated for continuous, interrupting, and short-time current ratings for each circuit breaker; voltage and frequency ratings same as switchgear. Minimum Circuit Breaker Ratings shall be as indicated below unless otherwise noted on the drawings:

Page 22: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 18 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

a. Current Rating of Main Circuit Breaker: 2000 A. b. Continuous Current Rating of Tie Circuit Breaker: 2000 A. c. Continuous Current Rating of Feeder Circuit Breaker: 1200 A.

2. Contact wear indicator. Readily accessible to field personnel. 3. Minimum six type A and six type B spare contacts. 4. Circuit breakers are interchangeable with vacuum breakers of same current and

interrupting rating. 5. Operating Mechanism: Mechanically and electrically trip-free, stored-energy

operating mechanism with the following features:

a. Normal Closing Speed: Independent of both control and operator. b. Slow Closing Speed: Optional with operator for inspection and adjustment.

1) Control Power: 48-V dc for closing and tripping.

6. Control Power Supply:

a. Dedicated 48VDC system b. System Requirements: Battery shall have number of cells and ampere-hour

capacity based on an initial specific gravity of 1.210 at 25 deg C with electrolyte at normal level and minimum ambient temperature of 13 deg C. Cycle battery before shipment to guarantee rated capacity on installation. Arrange to operate ungrounded. Battery system capacity shall be as recommended by switchgear manufacturer to operate the circuit breakers for intended duty.

c. Battery: Fiber NiCad batteries manufactured by “Hoppecke” , with system disconnect and overcurrent protective device to match existing on UCSD Switching Stations at MCSS.

d. 2-Step rack with electrical connections between battery cells and between rows of cells; include two flexible connectors with bolted-type terminals for output leads. Rate battery rack, cell supports, and anchorage for seismic requirements.

e. Accessories:

1) Set of cell numerals. 2) Monitoring system.

f. Charger: Manufacturer” LaMarche” to match existing at UCSD MCSS Switching Station. Refer to additional information in section 26 13 26 “Medium Voltage Switchgear”.

g. Battery Ground-Fault Detector: Initiates alarm when resistance to ground of positive or negative bus of battery is less than 5000 ohms.

h. Control Wiring: Factory installed, complete with bundling, lacing, and protection.

1) Conductors across Hinges and for Interconnections between Shipping Units: Flexible conductors for No. 8 AWG and smaller.

2) Conductors: Sized according to NFPA 70 for duty required.

Page 23: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 19 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

7. Stored-Energy Mechanism: Electrically charged, with optional manual charging and operation counter.

8. Test Accessories: relay and meter test plugs. 9. Protective Relays: SEL 700G for generator medium voltage circuit breaker relay

and SEL311L’s for Line Current Differential protection at both the new SIO substation and the existing Revelle Substation. refer to section 26 13 26 “Medium Voltage Metal Clad Switchgear” for additional information on protective relays, isolating switches

10. Auxiliary Contacts: For interlocking or remote indication of circuit-breaker

position, with spare auxiliary switches and other auxiliary switches required for normal circuit-breaker operation, quantity as indicated. Each consists of two Type "a" and two Type "b" stages (contacts) wired through secondary disconnect devices to a terminal block in stationary housing.

11. Drawout Features: Circuit-breaker mounting assembly equipped with a racking mechanism to position circuit breaker and hold it rigidly in connected, test, and disconnected positions.

a. Interlocks: Prevent movement of circuit breaker to or from connected position when it is closed.

b. Circuit-Breaker Positioning:

1) An open circuit breaker may be racked to or from connected, test, and disconnected positions only with the associated compartment door closed, unless live parts are covered by a full dead-front shield.

2) An open circuit breaker may be manually withdrawn to a position for removal from the structure with the door open.

3) Status for connection devices for different positions includes the following:

a) Test Position: Primary disconnect devices disengaged, and secondary disconnect devices and ground contact engaged.

b) Disconnected Position: Primary and secondary devices and ground contact disengaged.

12. Arc Chutes: Readily removable from associated circuit breaker when it is in disconnected position; arranged to permit inspection of contacts without removing circuit breaker from switchgear.

13. Padlocking Provisions: For installing at least three padlocks on each circuit breaker to secure its enclosure and prevent movement of drawout mechanism.

14. Operating Handle: One for each circuit breaker capable of manual operation.

a. Generator Paralleling Circuit Breakers: Interlocked with system control so that circuit breaker does not close unless mode selector switch is in "Auto" position and engine generator is synchronized with the isolated paralleling bus.

15. Electric Close Button: One for each electrically operated circuit breaker.

Page 24: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 20 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

a. Generator Paralleling Circuit Breakers: Interlocked with system control so that circuit breaker does not close unless mode selector switch is in "Auto" position and engine generator is synchronized with the isolated paralleling bus.

16. Mechanical Interlocking of Circuit Breakers: Uses a mechanical tripping lever or equivalent design and electrical interlocks.

17. Key Interlocks: Arranged so keys are attached at devices indicated. Mountings and hardware are included where future installation of key-interlock devices is indicated.

18. Undervoltage Trip Devices: Instantaneous, with adjustable pickup voltage. 19. Undervoltage Trip Devices: Adjustable time-delay and pickup voltage. 20. Shunt-Trip Devices:

a. 48-V dc for generator paralleling circuit breakers and for distribution paralleling switchgear circuit breakers.

b. Where indicated.

21. Indicating Lights: To indicate circuit breaker is open or closed, for main and bus tie circuit breakers interlocked either with each other or with external devices.

K. Metering:

1. Type and Locations: a. Generator Circuit Breakers: Multifunction digital-metering monitor;

equivalent to Schneider Electric Model ION 7650 or 7550 with Ethernet, RS485, Modbus, Ethergate, and digital input capability.and Analog metering for voltage, amperage, and frequency. on circuit-breaker door.

b. Distribution Circuit Breakers: Multifunction digital-metering monitor; equivalent to Schneider Electric Model ION 7650 or 7550 with Ethernet, RS485, Modbus, Ethergate, and digital input capability on circuit-breaker door.

c. Refer to drawings for additional information.

2. Instrument Transformers:

a. Comply with IEEE C57.13. b. Potential Transformers: Secondary-voltage rating of 120 V and NEMA

accuracy class of 0.3 with burdens of W, X, and Y. c. Current Transformers:

1) Burden and accuracy class suitable for connected relays, meters, and instruments.

2) Size for the maximum momentary current amperage based on calculation or the momentary rating of the circuit breaker protecting the conductor.

3) Include shorting-type terminal blocks.

3. Multifunction Digital-Metering Monitor:

Page 25: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 21 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

a. Microprocessor-based unit suitable for three- or four-wire systems. b. Inputs from sensors or 5-A current-transformer secondaries, and potential

terminals rated to 600 V. c. Switch-selectable digital display with the following features:

1) Phase Currents, Each Phase: Plus or minus 1 percent. 2) Phase-to-Phase Voltages, Three Phase: Plus or minus 1 percent. 3) Phase-to-Neutral Voltages, Three Phase: Plus or minus 1 percent. 4) Three-Phase Real Power: Plus or minus 2 percent. 5) Three-Phase Reactive Power: Plus or minus 2 percent. 6) Power Factor: Plus or minus 2 percent. 7) Frequency: Plus or minus 0.5 percent. 8) Integrated Demand, with Demand Interval Selectable from 5 to 60

Minutes: Plus or minus 2 percent. 9) Accumulated energy, in megawatt hours, plus or minus 2 percent;

stored values unaffected by power outages for up to 72 hours. 10) Manufacturer: Square D-Power Logic model “ION 7550” to match

existing Campus standard, unless otherwise indicated.

d. Communications module suitable for remote monitoring of meter quantities and functions. Interface communication and metering requirements according to Section 26 09 13 "Electrical Power Monitoring and Control."

e. Mounting: Display and control unit that is flush or semirecessed mounted in instrument compartment door.

4. Analog Instruments: Rectangular, 4-1/2 inches square, accurate within 1 percent of full scale range; semirecessed mounting, with antiparallax 250-degree scale and external adjustment.

a. Voltmeters: Cover an expanded scale range of normal voltage plus 10 percent.

b. Voltmeter Selector Switch: Rotary type with off position; provides readings of phase-to-phase and phase-to-neutral voltages.

c. Ammeters: Cover an expanded scale range of bus rating plus 10 percent. d. Ammeter Selector Switch: Permits current reading in each phase and

keeps current-transformer secondary circuits closed in off position.

L. Door-Mounted Control Components: Industrial-type oiltight devices and digital-display indicator lamps.

M. Control Power Supply:

1. Control power transformer shall supply 120-V ac control circuits from the generator source through secondary disconnect devices.

2. Include a control power transformer for each generator paralleling switchgear circuit breaker connected to the generator side of the circuit breaker.

3. Include a control power transformer for each distribution paralleling switchgear circuit breaker.

4. Dry-type epoxy coated transformers shall be in separate compartments for units larger than 3 kVA, including primary and secondary fuses.

Page 26: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 22 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

5. Two control power transformers in separate compartments with necessary interlocking relays; each transformer shall be connected to line side of associated main circuit breaker.

a. Secondary windings shall be connected through relay(s) to control bus to effect an automatic transfer scheme.

b. Secondary windings shall be connected through an internal automatic transfer switch to paralleling switchgear control power bus.

6. Control Power Fuses: Primary and secondary fuses shall provide current-limiting and overload protection.

N. Control Wiring:

1. Factory installed, complete with bundling, lacing, and protection. 2. Provide flexible conductors for No. 8 AWG and smaller, for conductors across

hinges and for conductors for interconnections between shipping units. 3. Conductors shall be sized according to NFPA 70 for duty required.

O. Identification: Comply with requirements in Section 26 05 53 "Identification for Electrical Systems" for electrical identification devices and installation.

1. Identify units, devices, controls, and wiring. 2. Mimic Bus: Continuous mimic bus, applied to front of paralleling medium-voltage

switchgear, arranged in one-line diagram format, using symbols and lettered designations consistent with approved mimic-bus diagram.

a. Mimic-bus segments coordinated with devices in paralleling medium-voltage switchgear sections to which applied, to produce a concise visual presentation of principal paralleling switchgear components and connections.

b. Medium: Painted graphics, as selected by University’s Representative. c. Color: Contrasting with factory-finish background; as selected by

University’s Representative from manufacturer's full range.

P. Indoor Switchgear Material: Steel.

Q. Outdoor Walk-in Enclosure Fabrication Requirements: NEMA 4X stainless steel weatherproof; integral structural-steel base frame with factory-applied asphaltic undercoating.

1. Features for Weatherproof Internal Aisle Construction:

a. Common internal aisle of sufficient width to permit protective-device withdrawal, disassembly, and servicing in aisle.

b. Aisle access doors with exterior padlocking provisions and interior panic latches.

c. Thermostatically controlled space heaters operating at one-half or less of rated voltage.

Page 27: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 23 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

d. Thermostatically controlled, aisle air-conditioning units sized to prevent temperatures exceeding 80 deg F

e. Vapor proof, LED lights with low-temperature ballasts, controlled by wall switch at each entrance. Fixture shall have emergency battery pack “Bodine B50ST” which will provide minimum 1100 lumens in emergency mode. Connect battery pack so that battery is charged all the time.

f. At least two duplex, ground-fault circuit-interrupter receptacles, located in aisle.

g. Provide wall mounted panel board served from switchgear CPT to serve receptacle, lighting, HVAC and other power requirements within walk-in enclosure.

h. Aisle ventilation louvers arranged with makeup air near the floor level and exhaust air near the roof level.

1) Louvers shall have insect and rodent screen and filter, arranged to permit air circulation while excluding insects, rodents, and exterior dust.

2) Exhaust fans.

R. Access: Fabricate enclosure with hinged, rear cover panels to allow access to rear interior of paralleling medium-voltage switchgear. All hardware shall be stainless steel.

S. Finish: Manufacturer's standard gray finish over a rust-inhibiting primer on phosphatizing-treated metal surfaces for interior components. Custom finish shall be selected by University Representative for exterior of enclosure

T. Accessories:

1. Tools for circuit-breaker and switchgear tests, inspections, maintenance, and operation.

2. Racking handle to manually move circuit breaker between connected and disconnected positions.

3. Portable test set for testing all functions of circuit-breaker, solid-state trip devices without removal from switchgear.

4. Relay and meter test plugs suitable for testing switchgear meters and switchgear class relays.

U. Circuit-Breaker Removal Apparatus: Portable, floor-supported, roller-base, elevating carriage arranged for moving circuit breakers in and out of compartments.

V. Spare-Fuse Cabinet: Identified and compartmented steel box or cabinet with lockable door.

W. Storage for Manual: Rack or holder, near the operating instructions, for a copy of maintenance manual.

Page 28: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 24 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

2.5 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL

A. Testing: Test and inspect paralleling medium-voltage switchgear, at paralleling medium-voltage switchgear manufacturer's factory.

1. Paralleling Medium-Voltage Switchgear:

a. The following separate tests shall be documented: 1) Dielectric Test (Per ANSI C37.20.2, 5.3.1) 2) Mechanical Test (Per ANSI C37.20.2, 5.3.2) 3) Grounding of Instrument Transformer Case Test (Per ANSI C37.20.2,

5.3.3) 4) Electrical Operation and Control Wiring Test (Per ANSI C37.20.2,

5.3.4.1) 5) Polarity Test (Per ANSI C37.20.2, 5.3.4.3) 6) Sequence Test (Per ANSI C37.20.2, 5.3.4.4)

b. Factory test with simulated inputs. Test control and relay functions for

proper operation. c. Provide report results per the factory witness test and corrective action

taken for items found unacceptable or in noncompliance d. Indicate field test and inspection procedures and interpret test results and

corrective action taken for compliance with specification requirements

B. University Representatives (total 3) shall witness factory tests. Coordinate scheduling of the factory witness test with University Representative and provide minimum 4 weeks advance notice, Include in bid, all costs associated with travel, meals and hotel accommodation for three University representatives to witness the tests. Perform successfully tests prior to witness test.

C. Prepare test and inspection reports and submit within two weeks of completion of tests for review.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 EXAMINATION

A. Upon delivery of switchgear and prior to unloading, inspect equipment for damage.

1. Examine tie rods and chains to verify they are undamaged and tight and that blocking and bracing are tight.

2. Verify that there is no evidence of load shifting in transit and that readings from transportation shock recorders, are within manufacturer's recommendations.

3. Examine switchgear for external damage, including dents or scratches in doors and sill, and termination provisions.

4. Compare switchgear and accessories received with the bill of materials to verify that the shipment is complete. Verify that switchgear and accessories conform to

Page 29: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 25 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

the manufacturer's quotation and shop drawings. If the shipment is not complete or does not comply with project requirements, notify the manufacturer in writing immediately.

5. Unload switchgear, observing packing label warnings and handling instructions. 6. Open compartment doors and inspect components for damage or displaced

parts, loose or broken connections, cracked or chipped insulators, bent mounting flanges, dirt or foreign material, and water or moisture.

B. Handling:

1. Handle switchgear according to according to manufacturer's recommendations; avoid damage to the enclosure, termination compartments, base, frame, tank, and internal components. Do not subject switchgear to impact, jolting, jarring, or rough handling.

2. Protect switchgear compartments against the entrance of dust, rain, and snow. 3. Transport switchgear upright to avoid internal stresses on equipment mounting

assemblies. Do not tilt or tip switchgear. 4. Use spreaders or a lifting beam to obtain a vertical lift and to protect switchgear

from straps bearing against the enclosure. Lifting cable pull angles may not be greater than 15 degrees from vertical.

5. Do not damage structure when handling switchgear.

C. Storage:

1. Store switchgear in a location that is clean and protected from weather. Protect switchgear from dirt, water, contamination, and physical damage. Do not store switchgear in the presence of corrosive or explosive gases.

2. Store switchgear with compartment doors closed. 3. Regularly inspect switchgear while in storage and maintain documentation of

storage conditions, noting any discrepancies or adverse conditions.

D. Examine roughing-in of conduits and grounding systems to verify the following:

1. Wiring entries comply with layout requirements. 2. Entries are within conduit-entry tolerances specified by manufacturer, and no

feeders will have to cross section barriers to reach load or line lugs.

E. Pre-Installation Checks:

1. Verify removal of any shipping bracing after placement.

F. Verify that ground connections are in place and that requirements in Section 26 05 26 "Grounding and Bonding for Electrical Systems" have been met. Maximum ground resistance shall be 5 ohms at switchgear location.

G. Examine areas and conditions, with Installer present, where paralleling medium-voltage switchgear will be installed for compliance with installation tolerances, required clearances, and other conditions affecting performance of the Work.

H. Proceed with installation only after unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected.

Page 30: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 26 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

3.2 INSTALLATION

A. Comply with the provisions of IEEE C37.20.2 sub clause titled "Guide for Handling, Storage, and Installation."

B. Comply with applicable portions in NECA 400.

C. Equipment Mounting:

1. Install paralleling medium-voltage switchgear walk-in enclosure on cast-in-place concrete pad. Comply with requirements for equipment bases and foundations specified in Section 03 30 00 "Cast-in-Place Concrete."

2. Comply with requirements for seismic control devices specified in Section 26 05 48.16 "Seismic Controls for Electrical Systems."

D. Temporary Lifting Provisions: Remove temporary lifting eyes, channels, brackets, and temporary blocking of moving parts from paralleling medium-voltage switchgear units and components.

E. Special UCSD ION meter installation requirements: The meter communicates via Ethernet and is connected to campus LAN. Install all meters with proper fuses and shunting blocks. The fusing and shunting blocks must be approved by the UCSD Meter Shop. Test all existing CT’s and submit results to UCSD Meter Shop for review.

F. All electrical meters should be panel mount type. All panel mount meters should be installed onto a hinged door capable of supporting the weight of the meter and wiring. The hinged door should be capable of being opened to at least 90degrees. Obtain approval from UCSD Meter Shop for all location and mounting plans prior to installation. If an existing meter is being removed, obtain a final read with date and time and note the existing meter number. Once the new meter has been installed, note the date and time of initial start-up.

G. Control power to the ION meters should be 120v as a standard; any deviation shall be reviewed by the meter shop. Control power should have properly sized disconnecting means inside of the enclosure with the meter as well as at its origination source to mitigate arc-flash potential inside of the meter enclosure. When CPT’s are used for control power to the ION meters, type of CPT & installation must be in accordance with the latest version of the Electrical Master Spec. At a minimum, properly sized fuse or circuit breaker devices should be installed on the primary and secondary.

H. Contractor shall provide and install all communication wiring and conduit required for ION meters to communicate through the UCSD Campus AMR system. Contractor shall program the meters to collect data accurately per UCSD standards. Contractor to provide documentation of the (pre)programmed parameters to UCSD Meter Shop for review and approval.

I. All wires shall connected to ION meters shall be labeled with the wire’s point name at each end. All communication wiring shall be pink and a minimum of cat 5E or 6. Serial communication wiring shall be blue, a minimum of 18/3, shielded, and twisted pairs. Pulse communication wiring shall be yellow or white, and a minimum of 18/3

Page 31: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 27 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

J. UCSD will be responsible for providing communication ports, terminating all 18/3 communication wiring, and programming the ION system front end.

3.3 IDENTIFICATION

A. Identify field-installed conductors, interconnecting wiring, and components; provide warning signs as specified in Section 26 05 53 "Identification for Electrical Systems."

B. Diagrams and Instructions:

1. Frame and mount under clear acrylic plastic on front of paralleling switchgear.

a. Operating Instructions: Printed basic instructions for paralleling medium-voltage switchgear, including control and key-interlock sequences and emergency procedures.

b. System Power Riser Diagrams: Depict power sources, feeders, distribution components, and major loads.

2. Storage for Maintenance: Include a rack or holder, near the operating instructions, for a copy of maintenance manual.

3.4 CONNECTIONS

A. Comply with grounding and bonding requirements in Section 26 05 26 "Grounding and Bonding for Electrical Systems."

B. Comply with 600V wire and cable requirements in Section 26 05 19 "Low-Voltage Electrical Power Conductors and Cables."

C. Comply with medium voltage cable and connection requirements in section 26 05 13 “Medium Voltage Cables”.

3.5 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL

A. Prepare for acceptance tests as follows:

1. Test insulation resistance for each switchgear bus, component, connecting supply, feeder, and control circuit.

2. Test continuity of each circuit. 3. Inspect paralleling switchgear installation, including wiring, components,

connections, and equipment. Test and adjust components and equipment. 4. Verify that electrical control wiring installation complies with manufacturer's

submittal by means of point-to-point continuity testing. 5. Complete installation and startup checks according to manufacturer's written

instructions. 6. All tests shall be witnessed by University Representative. Give minimum fourteen

(14) days advance notice prior to start of tests.

Page 32: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 28 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

B. Testing Agency: Engage an independent qualified testing agency to perform tests and inspections.

C. Manufacturer's Field Service: Engage a factory-authorized service representative to test and inspect components, assemblies, and equipment installations, including connections.

D. Perform the following tests and inspections:

1. Perform each visual and mechanical inspection and electrical tests stated in latest edition of NETA ATS. Refer to section 26 13 26 “Medium Voltage Metal Clad Switchgear” for additional information on testing requirements of MV switchgear, circuit breakers, relays, grounding system etc. Certify compliance with test parameters. Perform NETA tests and inspections for each of the following NETA categories:

a. AC generator and emergency systems. b. Switchgear. c. Circuit breakers. d. Instrument transformers. e. Metering and instrumentation. f. Grounding and Ground-fault systems. g. Battery systems. h. Surge arresters.

2. Perform NFPA 110 tests for Type 2 essential power systems.

E. Paralleling medium-voltage switchgear will be considered defective if it does not pass tests and inspections.

F. Prepare test and inspection reports.

G. Infrared Scanning: After Substantial Completion, but not more than 60 days after Final Acceptance, perform an infrared scan of each switchgear. Remove front and rear panels so joints and connections are accessible to portable scanner.

1. Follow-up Infrared Scanning: Perform an additional follow-up infrared scan of each switchgear 11 months after date of Substantial Completion.

2. Instrument: Use an infrared scanning device designed to measure temperature or to detect significant deviations from normal values. Provide calibration record for device.

3. Record of Infrared Scanning: Prepare a certified report that identifies switchgear checked and that describes scanning results. Include color scanned pictures, notation of deficiencies detected, remedial action taken, and observations after remedial action.

H. Test sequence of operation step by step for each mode.

Page 33: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Version Issued 1/31/2016

4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement PARALLELING MEDIUM-VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR University of California, San Diego 26 23 24 – page 29 100% CD / BID SET REVISED APRIL 19, 2017 – ADDENDUM 1 February 15, 2017

3.6 ADJUSTING

A. Set field-adjustable, electronic circuit-breaker trip characteristics according to results specified in Section 26 05 73 "Overcurrent Protective Device Coordination Study."

B. Set field-adjustable, electronic circuit-breaker trip characteristics.

C. Confirm walk-in enclosure HVAC system is functioning as specified

3.7 CLEANING

A. On completion of installation, inspect interior and exterior of paralleling medium-voltage switchgear. Vacuum dirt and debris; do not use compressed air to assist in cleaning. Repair damaged finishes.

3.8 PROTECTION

A. Temporary Heating: Apply temporary heat to paralleling medium-voltage switchgear, according to manufacturer's written instructions, throughout periods when paralleling switchgear environment is not controlled for temperature and humidity within manufacturer's stipulated service conditions.

3.9 DEMONSTRATION

A. Engage a factory-authorized service representative to train University's maintenance personnel to adjust, operate, and maintain paralleling medium-voltage switchgear.

END OF SECTION 26 23 13

Page 34: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 35: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 36: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT Project No.: 4746/A4L-440/966025 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

1 of 2

ADDENDUM NO. 1 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

(As of April 18, 2017)

Q1: Sheet S1.101 shown the new Retaining Wall Footing Type A/S2.01 extending South past the corner of the Existing Single Story Cold Storage Building, see attached drawing. This will require shoring and undermining a portion of the existing building foundation in order to excavate and place the retaining wall footing. Please advise if this is the intended retaining wall footing configuration at this location.

A1: See attachment. For this location, the toe of the wall A/S2.01 may be reduced to avoid conflict with the existing building footing. The shortened toe width will be reduced from 6’-0” to 3’-4” at this location only, to avoid undermining the existing building footing.

Q2: Please review the following note from sheet G0.01. It was said at the job walk that the only item USCD wanted returned was the “Circuit Breaker Crane” mentioned in Note 7, all other pieces and parts to be demolished and removed from the site.

A2: In addition what is listed in the RFI (G0.01) contractor shall also provide the copper within the

existing SIO Substation back to UCSD. Q3: Is a soils report available per the following note? On sheet C1.00 it states: “1. All grading,

excavation, and embankment shall be in accordance with the geotechnical investigation, emergency testing, inc, Project No. 140510P3, dated November 17th.

A3: Please see the attached soil report for your reference. Q4: Specification 26 13 26, Part 1.7, F. Clarification - Vacuum Circuit Breakers with configured P/Ns

and insulated bussing are generally made-to-order, and not stock items with any Switchgear Manufacturer.

A4: Confirmed, the electrical equipment is made to order. Q5: Specification 26 13 26, Part 2.1, A. Clarification - This section specifically mention products by

one of the following: Square D, Eaton Cutler-Hammer, or Equal. Will UCSD allow other premium Switchgear OEM other than Square D or Eaton as Equal if this Switchgear OEM can provide the same features, functions, and characteristics, if not better than the other manufacturers specifically named?

A5: The alternate must be equal and documentation for said equal alternate shall be submitted to UCSD for review and approval within 30 days after the Notice to Proceed.

Q6: Specification 26 13 26, Part 2.2, A. Clarification - NEMA 4X is not an applicable rating for ANSI/IEEE C37.20.2 Switchgear construction. That said, equipment can/will be manufactured from either 304 or 316 (please advise) stainless steel, powder painted ANSI 61 grey. (See next item in this RFI.)

A6: 304 or 316 stainless steel are acceptable. Q7: Specification 26 13 26, Part 2.4, C. Question - Is preference for:

a) Outdoor Walk-in (i.e. common aisle, non-self-supporting, non-insulated) Switchgear construction; or b) PDC (i.e. self-supporting, insulated) construction containing Indoor Switchgear.

Page 37: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

SIO EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT Project No.: 4746/A4L-440/966025 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

2 of 2

In case of "a," stainless steel Switchgear construction makes sense. In case of "b," we recommend the PDC exterior only be made of stainless or galvanized steel, with the Indoor Switchgear inside constructed of standard, cold-rolled steel powder painted ANSI 61 grey.

A7: Response: Item (b) is required. Q8: Specification 26 13 26, Part 2.9, C. Clarification - NiCad batteries specified despite VRLA

definition in Part 1.2, D.

A8: Confirmed per UCSD requirements. Q9: “By scaling the Civil Drawing Sheet C4.00, and using the elevations shown for the Retaining Wall

on the Structural Drawing Sheet S2.01 we are concerned that shoring may be required during the construction of a portion of the Retaining Wall. Has the need for shoring, at this location, been determined by the Design Team? Please advise.

A9: Means and methods for construction and the need for shoring to construct the retaining wall is to be determined by the contractor. Contractor shall factor the shoring needed into the bid. This RFI should be reviewed by the UCSD Civil and Geotech to confirm if the slope will require shoring.

Q10: Reference: Sheets E8.01 & E8.03. It appears that panel SIO-RPL and panel RPL are fed from two different transformers T-ENC-SEC0 and T-ENC-SEC. Please advise as only (1) 45kva transformer is shown on the single line on E8.02.

A10: Confirmed only (1) one 45kVA transformer is required and will serve ‘SIO-RPL’ and ‘RPL’ with dual lugs from ‘SIO-RPL’ to ‘RPL’.

Q11: Reference: Sheets E8.01 & E8.03. Who is the fire alarm manufacturer per note 8 on sheet ES1.01?

A11: Existing fire alarm manufacturer is Simplex 4100. Q12: Please extend the RFI deadline till 4/14/17 at 4PM A12: No longer applicable. Q13: Reference Alternate 2 Description: Provide the Revelle to SIO portion of the Campus Load Shed

system per specs and ELSseries drawings, included in Bid Set. Please provide more definition of Alternate #2. As of now we are under the assumption that all that is included in this alternate is the fiber optic cable installation, termination and testing from Revelle to SIO. Will any other items need to be included in this alternate?

A13: All work related to Power Max system shall be per ELS1.00 through ELS 1.51 sheets and associated spec section 271675 and SEL Commissioning specification.

Page 38: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Corporate Headquarters 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, CA 92120

Toll Free: 877.215.4321 www.scst.com

San Diego Los Angeles Inland Empire Central Valley

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS

SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA

UCSD JOB NO. 4746

PREPARED FOR:

MS. ROSALIE PHAM, P.E. PRINCIPAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO FACILITIES DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

10280 NORTH TORREY PINES ROAD, SUITE 470 LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037

PREPARED BY:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120

Providing Professional Engineering Services Since 1959

Page 39: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

San Diego Los Angeles Inland Empire Central Valley

Corporate Headquarters 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, CA 92120

Toll Free: 877.215.4321 www.scst.com

November 17, 2014 SCS&T No. 140510P3 Report No. 1 Mr. Rosalie Pham, P.E. Principal Electrical Engineer University of California, San Diego Facilities Design and Construction 10280 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 470 La Jolla, California 92037 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA UCSD JOB NO. 4746

Dear Rosalie:

Southern California Soil & Testing Inc. (SCS&T) is pleased to present our report describing the geotechnical investigation performed for the subject project. SCS&T conducted the geotechnical investigation in general conformance with the scope of work presented in our proposal dated October 7, 2014. If you have any questions, please call us at (619) 280-4321.

Respectfully Submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6/30/15

Thomas B. Canady, PE 50057 Principal Engineer

W. Lee Vanderhurst, CEG 1125 Principal Engineering Geologist

TBC:WLV:ma:aw (1) Addressee via e-mail at [email protected]

Page 40: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i

1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1

2 SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................................................. 1

2.1 FIELD INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................. 12.2 LABORATORY TESTING .............................................................................................. 12.3 ANALYSIS AND REPORT PREPARATION ................................................................... 12.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS TESTING ............................................................................. 2

3 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 2

3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 23.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 2

4 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS .......................................................................................................... 3

4.1 CITY OF SAN DIEGO SEISMIC SAFETY STUDY ......................................................... 34.2 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS .............................. 34.3 FAULTING AND SURFACE RUPTURE ......................................................................... 34.4 LANDSLIDES AND SLOPE STABILITY ......................................................................... 34.5 LIQUEFACTION AND DYNAMIC SETTLEMENT ........................................................... 44.6 FLOODING, TSUNAMIS AND SEICHES ....................................................................... 44.7 SUBSIDENCE ................................................................................................................ 44.8 HYDRO-CONSOLIDATION ............................................................................................ 4

5 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 4

6 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................... 5

6.1 SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING ........................................................................... 56.1.1 Site Preparation ..................................................................................................... 56.1.2 Earthwork .............................................................................................................. 56.1.3 Imported Soil ......................................................................................................... 56.1.4 Expansive Soil ....................................................................................................... 56.1.5 Site Excavation Characteristics ............................................................................. 56.1.6 Oversized Material ................................................................................................. 66.1.7 Temporary Excavation Slopes ............................................................................... 66.1.8 Temporary Shoring ................................................................................................ 66.1.9 Slopes ................................................................................................................... 66.1.10 Surface Drainage ................................................................................................. 76.1.11 Grading Plan Review ........................................................................................... 7

6.2 FOUNDATIONS ............................................................................................................. 76.2.1 Shallow Spread Footings ....................................................................................... 76.2.2 Settlement ............................................................................................................. 86.2.3 Foundation Plan Review ........................................................................................ 86.2.4 Foundation Excavation Observations .................................................................... 8

6.3 SLABS-ON-GRADE ....................................................................................................... 86.4 CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS .......................................................................... 8

6.4.1 Foundations ........................................................................................................... 86.4.2 Lateral Earth Pressures ......................................................................................... 86.4.3 Seismic Earth Pressure ......................................................................................... 9

Page 41: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

SECTION PAGE

6.4.4 Backfill ................................................................................................................... 96.5 PAVEMENT SECTION RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 96.6 SOIL CORROSIVITY ....................................................................................................10

7 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION ............................................10

8 CLOSURE .............................................................................................................................11

9 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................11

ATTACHMENTS

FIGURES Figure 1............................................................................................................. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2......................................................................................... Subsurface Investigation Map Figure 3.................................................................................................. Geologic Cross Section Figure 4.................................................................................... Regional Geology and Fault Map Figure 5.................................................................. City of San Diego Seismic Safety Study Map Figure 6........................................................................ Typical Retaining Wall Backdrain Details APPENDICES Appendix I ....................................................................................................... Field Investigation Appendix II ..................................................................................................... Laboratory Testing

Page 42: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCS&T) performed for the subject project. The site is located within Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) in the La Jolla community of the City of San Diego, California. We understand the project will consist of the design and construction of 12-inch thick concrete slabs-on-grade for generator and switchgear pads, retaining walls, and piping. The purpose of our work is to provide conclusions and recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of the project.

SCS&T explored the subsurface conditions by drilling two borings using a limited-access drill rig equipped with a solid stem auger and excavating two test pits using hand tools. The borings were drilled to depths of about 5½ feet and 12½ feet below the existing ground surface. The test pits were excavated to depths of about 3 feet and 3½ feet below the existing ground surface. Each of the borings and test pits encountered refusal. An SCS&T geologist logged the borings and test pits and collected samples of the materials encountered for laboratory testing. SCS&T tested selected samples from the borings to evaluate pertinent soil classification and engineering properties to assist in developing geotechnical conclusions and recommendations.

The materials encountered in the explorations consist of fill, colluvium and Scripps Formation. The fill and colluvium consist of soft to medium stiff sandy lean clay with trace amounts of gravel. The Scripps Formation consists of hard sandy siltstone to sandy claystone. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings or test pits.

The main geotechnical considerations affecting the planned development are the presence of potentially compressible fill and colluvium and expansive soil. To reduce the potential for settlement, the existing fill and colluvium should be excavated in their entirety beneath settlement sensitive improvements. Additionally, Scripps Formation within 2 feet of finished pad grade should be excavated. To mitigate expansive soils, the concrete slabs-on-grade pads should be underlain by at least 2 feet of granular material with an expansion index of 50 or less. It is expected that most of the onsite soils will not meet the select granular material criteria. Strongly cemented zones should be expected in the Scripps Formation. Contract documents should specify that the contractor mobilize equipment capable of excavating and compacting materials with concretions to reduce the potential that claims for delays or extra work will arise. The recommendations presented herein may need to be updated once final plans are developed.

Page 43: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

1 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the geotechnical investigation Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCS&T) performed for the subject project. We understand the project will consist of the design and construction of 12-inch thick concrete slabs-on-grade for generator and switchgear pads, retaining walls, and piping. The purpose of our work is to provide conclusions and recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of the project. Figure 1 presents a site vicinity map.

2 SCOPE OF WORK

2.1 FIELD INVESTIGATION

SCS&T explored the subsurface conditions by drilling two borings using a limited-access drill rig equipped with a solid stem auger and excavating two test pits using hand tools. The borings were drilled to depths of about 5½ feet and 12½ feet below the existing ground surface. The test pits were excavated to depths of about 3 feet and 3½ feet below the existing ground surface. Each of the borings and test pits encountered refusal. Figure 2 shows the approximate locations of the borings and test pits. An SCS&T geologist logged the borings and test pits and collected samples of the materials encountered for laboratory testing. The logs of the borings and test pits are presented in Appendix I. Soils are classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System illustrated on Figure I-1.

2.2 LABORATORY TESTING

Selected samples obtained from the borings were tested to evaluate pertinent soil classification and engineering properties and enable development of geotechnical conclusions and recommendations. The laboratory tests consisted of:

• In Situ Moisture and Density • Grain Size Distribution • Atterberg Limits • R-Value • Expansion Index • Corrosivity • Direct Shear

The results of the laboratory tests, and brief explanations of test procedures, are presented in Appendix II.

2.3 ANALYSIS AND REPORT PREPARATION

The results of the field and laboratory tests were evaluated to develop conclusions and recommendations regarding:

• Subsurface conditions beneath the site • Potential geologic hazards • Criteria for seismic design in accordance with the 2013 California Building Code • Site preparation and grading

Page 44: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 2

• Appropriate alternatives for foundation support along with geotechnical engineering criteria for design of the foundations

• Support for concrete slabs-on-grade • Lateral pressures for the design of retaining walls • Pavement sections • Corrosion potential

2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS TESTING

SCS&T subcontracted with a State of California certified laboratory to perform environmental testing of the onsite soils as an indication of the presence of hazardous materials at the site. The analytical test results are presented in a separate report.

3 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The site is located within Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) in the La Jolla community of the City of San Diego, California. The site is located south and west of Downwind Way at its intersection with Shellback Way and north of the existing Deep Sea Drilling East building. Existing improvements at the site consist of a refrigerated modular building and associated utilities and a parking lot paved with asphalt concrete. The northern and eastern portions of the site consist of slopes up to about 13 feet in height ascending up to Downwind Way at inclinations between about 2:1 and 1⅓:1 (horizontal:vertical). Slope vegetation consists of trees, bushes and weeds. Ground surface elevations range from about 180 feet at top of the slope at the southeast corner of the site to about 160 feet at the southwest corner of the site.

3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The materials encountered in the explorations consist of fill, colluvium and Scripps Formation. Descriptions of the materials are presented below. Figure 2 shows the site-specific geology. Figure 3 presents a geologic cross section. Figure 4 presents the regional geology in the vicinity of the site.

Fill - The fill consists of soft to medium stiff sandy lean clay with trace amounts of gravel. The fill extends to depths between about 2 feet and 3 feet below the existing ground surface.

Colluvium - Buried colluvium was encountered beneath the fill in boring B-1. The colluvium consists of soft to medium stiff sandy lean clay with trace amounts of gravel and extends to a depth of about 9½ feet below the existing ground surface.

Scripps Formation - The site is underlain by Scripps Formation. The Scripps Formation consists of hard sandy siltstone to sandy claystone.

Groundwater - Groundwater was not encountered in the borings or test pits. The permanent groundwater level is expected to be below a depth that will influence planned construction.

Page 45: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 3

However, groundwater levels may fluctuate in the future due to rainfall, irrigation, broken pipes, or changes in site drainage. Because groundwater rise or seepage is difficult to predict, such conditions are typically mitigated if and when they occur.

4 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS

4.1 CITY OF SAN DIEGO SEISMIC SAFETY STUDY

Figure 5 shows the approximate site location on the City of San Diego Seismic Safety Study map. The site is located in Geologic Hazard Category 53, which is defined as level or sloping terrain with unfavorable geologic structure and low to moderate risk. In our opinion, the geologic risk is low.

4.2 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS

A geologic hazard likely to affect the project is groundshaking as a result of movement along an active fault zone in the vicinity of the subject site. The site coefficients and adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations in accordance with the 2013 California Building Code are presented below:

Site Coordinates: Latitude 32.86764° Longitude -117.25117° Site Class: C Site Coefficients, Fa = 1.000 Fv = 1.303 Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at Short Periods, Ss = 1.281g Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1-Second Period, S1 = 0.497g SDS = 0.854g SD1 = 0.432g PGAM = 0.578g

4.3 FAULTING AND SURFACE RUPTURE

The closest known active fault is the Rose Canyon fault zone (Del Mar section) located about 1½ kilometers west-southwest of the site. The nearest mapped fault is an unnamed fault located within 200 feet of the site (City of San Diego, 2008). This fault is not known to have offset Holocene sediments indicating it is not an active fault. The State of California does not consider this fault to be active, and an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone has not been established for the fault. It is our opinion that, according to State of California guidelines, the unnamed fault is not a potential source of seismic shaking or ground rupture. The site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No active faults are known to underlie or project toward the site. Therefore, the probability of fault rupture is considered low.

4.4 LANDSLIDES AND SLOPE STABILITY

Evidence of landslides or slope instabilities was not observed. The potential for landslides or slope instabilities to occur at the site is considered low.

Page 46: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 4

4.5 LIQUEFACTION AND DYNAMIC SETTLEMENT

Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated, generally fine sands and silts are subjected to strong ground shaking. The soils lose shear strength and become liquid; potentially resulting in large total and differential ground surface settlements as well as possible lateral spreading during an earthquake. Due to the lack of shallow groundwater, and given the relatively dense nature of the materials beneath the site, the potential for liquefaction and dynamic settlement to occur is considered negligible.

4.6 FLOODING, TSUNAMIS AND SEICHES

The site is not located within a flood zone or dam inundation area. The site is not located within a mapped area on the State of California Tsunami Inundation Maps; therefore, damage due to flooding or tsunamis is considered negligible. Seiches are periodic oscillations in large bodies of water such as lakes, harbors, bays, or reservoirs. The site is not located adjacent to any lakes or confined bodies of water; therefore, the potential for a seiche to affect the site is negligible.

4.7 SUBSIDENCE

The site is not located in an area of known subsidence associated with fluid withdrawal (groundwater or petroleum); therefore, the potential for subsidence due to the extraction of fluids is negligible.

4.8 HYDRO-CONSOLIDATION

Hydro-consolidation can occur in recently deposited (less than 10,000 years old) sediments that were deposited in a semi-arid environment. Examples of such sediments are aolian sands, alluvial fan deposits, and mudflow sediments deposited during flash floods. The pore space between particle grains can re-adjust when inundated by groundwater causing the material to consolidate. The relatively dense materials beneath the site are not susceptible to hydro-consolidation.

5 CONCLUSIONS

The main geotechnical considerations affecting the planned development are the presence of potentially compressible fill and colluvium and expansive soil. Site preparation will need to be performed in areas to receive on-grade slabs, retaining walls or new fill to reduce the potential for distress to the planned improvements. Strongly cemented zones should be expected in the Scripps Formation. Contract documents should specify that the contractor mobilize equipment capable of excavating and compacting materials with concretions to reduce the potential that claims for delays or extra work will arise.

Page 47: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 5

6 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING

6.1.1 Site Preparation

Site preparation should begin with the removal of existing improvements, vegetation and debris. The existing fill and colluvium should be excavated in their entirety in areas to receive slabs-on-grade, retaining walls or new fill. Additionally, Scripps Formation within 2 feet of finished pad grade should be excavated. Horizontally, the excavation should extend at least 2 feet outside the perimeter of the improvements or up to existing improvements, whichever is less. The concrete slabs-on-grade should be underlain by at least 2 feet of granular material with an expansion index of 50 or less determined in accordance with ASTM D4829. We anticipate that most of the onsite soils will not meet the select granular material criteria. A SCS&T representative should observe conditions exposed in the bottom of the excavation to determine if additional excavation is required.

6.1.2 Earthwork

Fill should be placed in 6- to 8-inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Where fill is to be placed on surfaces inclined steeper than 5:1 (horizontal:vertical), benches should be excavated to provide a relatively level surface for fill placement. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for the evaluation of relative compaction should be determined in accordance with ASTM D1557. Utility trench backfill beneath structures and on-grade slabs should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction.

6.1.3 Imported Soil

Imported soil should consist of predominately granular soil free of organic matter and rocks greater than 6 inches. Imported soil should have an expansion index of 20 or less and should be inspected and, if appropriate, tested by SCS&T prior to transport to the site.

6.1.4 Expansive Soil

The onsite soils tested have a medium expansion potential. The recommendations presented in this report reflect a low expansion potential.

6.1.5 Site Excavation Characteristics

It is anticipated that excavations can be achieved with conventional earthwork equipment in good working order. Difficult excavation in strongly cemented materials should be anticipated within the Scripps Formation. Contract documents should specify that the contractor mobilize equipment capable of excavating and compacting materials with concretions to reduce the potential that claims for delays or extra work will arise.

Page 48: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 6

6.1.6 Oversized Material

Excavations may generate oversized material. Oversized material is defined as rocks or cemented clasts greater than 6 inches in largest dimension. Based on the planned construction, there does not appear to be suitable space onsite for disposal of oversized material within fills. Oversized material should be broken down to no greater than 6 inches in largest dimension for use in fill, used as landscape material, or disposed offsite.

6.1.7 Temporary Excavation Slopes

Temporary excavations 3 feet deep or less can be made vertically. Deeper temporary excavations in fill or colluvium should be laid back no steeper than 1:1 (horizontal:vertical). Deeper temporary excavations in Scripps Formation should be laid back no steeper than ¾:1 (horizontal:vertical). The faces of temporary slopes should be inspected daily by the contractor’s Competent Person before personnel are allowed to enter the excavation. Any zones of potential instability, sloughing or raveling should be brought to the attention of the Engineer and corrective action implemented before personnel begin working in the excavation. Excavated soils should not be stockpiled behind temporary excavations within a distance equal to the depth of the excavation. SCS&T should be notified if other surcharge loads are anticipated so that lateral load criteria can be developed for the specific situation. If temporary slopes are to be maintained during the rainy season, berms are recommended along the tops of slopes to prevent runoff water from entering the excavation and eroding the slope faces. Slopes steeper than those described above or temporary excavations that extend below a plane inclined at 1½:1 (horizontal:vertical) downward from the outside bottom edge of existing structures or improvements will require shoring. A shoring system consisting of soldier piles and lagging can be used.

6.1.8 Temporary Shoring

For design of cantilevered shoring, an active soil pressure equal to a fluid weighing 35 pcf can be used for level retained ground or 55 pcf for 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) sloping ground. The surcharge loads on shoring from traffic and construction equipment adjacent to the excavation can be modeled by assuming an additional 2 feet of soil behind the shoring. An allowable passive pressure of 350 psf per foot of embedment (over twice the pile diameter) up to a maximum of 7,500 psf can be used for soldier piles embedded in formation. Soldier piles should be spaced at least three pile diameters, center to center.

6.1.9 Slopes

All permanent slopes should be constructed at an inclination of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter. Faces of fill slopes should be compacted either by rolling with a sheep-foot roller or other suitable equipment, or by overfilling and cutting back to design grade. All slopes are

Page 49: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 7

susceptible to surficial slope failure and erosion. Water should not be allowed to flow over the top of slopes. Additionally, slopes should be planted with vegetation that will reduce the potential for erosion.

6.1.10 Surface Drainage

Final surface grades around structures should be designed to collect and direct surface water away from structures and toward appropriate drainage facilities. The ground around the structure should be graded so that surface water flows rapidly away from the structure without ponding. In general, we recommend that the ground adjacent to the structure slope away at a gradient of at least 2%. Densely vegetated areas where runoff can be impaired should have a minimum gradient of at least 5% within the first 5 feet from the structure. Roof gutters with downspouts that discharge directly into a closed drainage system are recommended on structures. Drainage patterns established at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the proposed structures. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscape growth. Should excessive irrigation, impaired drainage, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones of perched groundwater can develop.

6.1.11 Grading Plan Review

SCS&T should review the grading plans and earthwork specifications to ascertain whether the intent of the recommendations contained in this report have been implemented, and that no revised recommendations are needed due to changes in the development scheme.

6.2 FOUNDATIONS

6.2.1 Shallow Spread Footings

Shallow spread footings with bottom levels on compacted fill or Scripps Formation can be used to support the planned retaining walls. Footings should extend at least 24 inches below lowest adjacent finished grade. A minimum width of 18 inches is recommended. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) can be used. Lateral loads will be resisted by friction between the bottoms of footings and passive pressure on the faces of footings and other structural elements below grade. An allowable coefficient of friction of 0.30 can be used. Passive pressure can be computed using an allowable lateral pressure of 350 psf per foot of depth below the ground surface. The upper 1 foot of soil should not be relied on for passive support unless the ground is covered with pavements or slabs. The bearing and passive pressure values can be increased by ⅓ when considering the total of all loads, including wind or seismic forces. Footings located adjacent to or within slopes should be extended to a depth such that a minimum horizontal distance of 7 feet exists between the lower outside footing edge and the face of the slope.

Page 50: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 8

6.2.2 Settlement

Total foundation settlements are estimated to be less than 1 inch. Differential settlements across continuous footings are estimated to be less than ¾ inch over a distance of 40 feet. Settlements should be completed shortly after structural loads are applied.

6.2.3 Foundation Plan Review

SCS&T should review the foundation plans to ascertain that the intent of the recommendations in this report has been implemented and that revised recommendations are not necessary as a result of changes after this report was completed.

6.2.4 Foundation Excavation Observations

A representative from SCS&T should observe the foundation excavations prior to forming or placing reinforcing steel.

6.3 SLABS-ON-GRADE

The top 2 feet of material below the planned concrete slabs-on-grade should have an expansion index of 50 or less determined in accordance with ASTM D4829. Slabs should be provided with weakened plane joints. Joints should be placed in accordance with the American Concrete Institute guidelines. The project architect should select the final joint patterns. A 1-inch maximum size aggregate mix is recommended for concrete. The corrosion potential of on-site soils with respect to reinforced concrete will need to be taken into account in concrete mix design. Coarse and fine aggregate in concrete should conform to the “Greenbook” Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

6.4 CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS

6.4.1 Foundations

Foundation recommendations were provided in Section 6.2.1 of this report.

6.4.2 Lateral Earth Pressures

The active earth pressure for the design of unrestrained earth retaining structures with level backfills can be taken as equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 40 pcf. The at-rest earth pressure for the design of restrained earth retaining structures with level backfills can be taken as equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 60 pcf. The above values assume a granular and drained backfill condition. Higher lateral earth pressures would apply if walls retain expansive clay soils. An additional 20 pcf should be added to these values for walls with a 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) sloping backfill. An increase in earth pressure equivalent to an additional 2 feet of retained soil can be used to account for surcharge loads from light traffic. The above values do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design. If any other

Page 51: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 9

surcharge loads are anticipated, SCS&T should be contacted for the necessary increase in soil pressure.

Retaining walls should be designed to resist hydrostatic pressures or be provided with a backdrain to reduce the accumulation of hydrostatic pressures. Backdrains may consist of a 2-foot wide zone of ¾-inch crushed rock. The backdrain should be separated from the adjacent soils using a non-woven filter fabric, such as Mirafi 140N or equivalent. Weep holes should be provided or a perforated pipe (Schedule 40 PVC) should be installed at the base of the backdrain and sloped to discharge to a suitable storm drain facility. As an alternative, a geocomposite drainage system such as Miradrain 6000 or equivalent placed behind the wall and connected to a suitable storm drain facility can be used. The project architect should provide waterproofing specifications and details. Figure 6 shows typical conventional retaining wall backdrain details.

6.4.3 Seismic Earth Pressure

If required, the seismic earth pressures can be taken as equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 22 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for flexible walls and 43 pcf for stiff walls. These values are for level backfill conditions and do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design. This pressure is in addition to the un-factored static active pressures. The allowable passive pressure and bearing capacity can be increased by ⅓ in determining the stability of the wall.

6.4.4 Backfill

All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Backfill soils should consist of granular, free-draining material having an expansion index of 20 or less determined in accordance with ASTM D4829. Expansive or clayey soil should not be used for backfill material. We anticipate that most of the onsite soils will not meet the granular material criteria. Additionally, fill within 3 feet from the back of the wall should not contain rocks greater than 3 inches in any dimension. The wall should not be backfilled until the grout has reached an adequate strength.

6.5 PAVEMENT SECTION RECOMMENDATIONS

The pavement support characteristics of the soils encountered during our investigation are considered poor to moderate. An R-value of 17 was assumed for design of preliminary pavement sections. The actual R-value of the subgrade soils should be determined after grading and final pavement sections be provided. Based on an R-value of 17, the following pavement structural sections are recommended for the assumed Traffic Indices.

Page 52: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 10

Flexible Pavement Sections

Traffic Type Traffic Index Asphalt Concrete

(inches) Aggregate Base*

(inches)

Parking Stalls 4.5 3 7

Drive Lanes 6.0 4 9

Heavy Traffic Areas 7.0 5 11 *Aggregate Base should conform to Class 2 Aggregate Base in accordance with the Caltrans Standard Specifications or Crushed Miscellaneous Base in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Sections

Traffic Type Traffic Index JPCP*

(inches) Aggregate Base*

(inches)

Parking Stalls 4.5 6 6

Drive Lanes 6.0 7 6

Heavy Traffic Areas 7.0 7 6 *Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement

The top 12 inches of subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95% relative compaction. All soft or yielding areas should be removed and replaced with compacted fill. If the subgrade consists of competent Scripps Formation, scarification and recompaction need not be performed. The aggregate base material should be compacted to at least 95% relative compaction. All materials and methods of construction should conform to good engineering practices and the minimum standards of UCSD.

6.6 SOIL CORROSIVITY

A representative sample of the onsite soils was tested to evaluate corrosion potential. The test results are presented in Appendix II. The project design engineer can use the sulfate results in conjunction with ACI 318 to specify the water/cement ratio, compressive strength and cementitious material types for concrete exposed to soil. A corrosion engineer should be contacted to provide specific corrosion control recommendations.

7 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION

The geotechnical engineer should review project plans and specifications prior to bidding and construction to check that the intent of the recommendations in this report has been incorporated. Observations and tests should be performed during construction. If the conditions encountered during construction differ from those anticipated based on the subsurface exploration program, the presence of the geotechnical engineer during construction will enable an evaluation of the

Page 53: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 11

exposed conditions and modifications of the recommendations in this report or development of additional recommendations in a timely manner.

8 CLOSURE

SCS&T should be advised of any changes in the project scope so that the recommendations contained in this report can be evaluated with respect to the revised plans. Changes in recommendations will be verified in writing. The findings in this report are valid as of the date of this report. Changes in the condition of the site can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or work on this or adjacent areas. In addition, changes in the standards of practice and government regulations can occur. Thus, the findings in this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. This report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations to site conditions at that time.

In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the boring locations, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings.

9 REFERENCES

American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2012), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary, August.

Benton Engineering, Inc. (1972), Soils Investigation, New Deep Sea Drilling Building, (ACT. #906161), Core Repository for Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, September 14.

California Emergency Management Agency, California Geological Survey, University of Southern California (Cal EMA) (2009), Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, La Jolla Quadrangle, June 1.

Caltrans (2010), Standard Specifications.

City of San Diego (2008), Seismic Safety Study, Geologic Hazards and Faults, Grid Tile: 29, Development Services Department, April 3.

Page 54: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

University of California, San Diego November 17, 2014 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvements SCS&T No. 140510P3-1 La Jolla, California Page 12

International Code Council (2012), 2013 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, Based on the 2012 International Existing Building Code, Effective Date: January 1, 2014.

Public Works Standards, Inc. (2011), “Greenbook,” Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, 2012 Edition.

Page 55: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 56: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 57: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 58: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 59: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 60: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

SOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date:

Job Number: Figure: 6140510P3-1

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS

SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

TBC 11/17/2014

Page 61: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

APPENDIX I

APPENDIX I FIELD INVESTIGATION

Our field investigation consisted of drilling two borings using a limited-access drill rig equipped with a solid stem auger and excavating two test pits using hand tools on October 24, 2014. The borings were drilled to depths of about 5½ feet and 12½ feet below the existing ground surface. The test pits were excavated to depths of about 3 feet and 3½ feet below the existing ground surface. Each of the borings and test pits encountered refusal. Figure 2 shows the approximate locations of the borings and test pits. The field investigation was performed under the observation of an SCS&T geologist who also logged the borings and test pits and obtained samples of the materials encountered.

Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a modified California (CAL) sampler, which is ring-lined split tube sampler with a 3-inch outer diameter and 2½-inch inner diameter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed using a 2-inch outer diameter and 1⅜-inch inner diameter split tube sampler. The CAL and SPT samplers were driven with a 140-pound weight dropping 30 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the samplers the final 12 inches of an 18-inch drive is noted on the borings logs as “Driving Resistance (blows/foot of drive).” SPT and CAL sampler refusal was encountered when 50 blows were applied during any one of the three 6-inch intervals, a total of 100 blows was applied, or there was no discernible sampler advancement during the application of 10 successive blows. Disturbed bulk samples were obtained from the SPT sampler and drill cuttings.

The soils are classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System as illustrated on Figure I-1. Logs of the borings and test pits are presented on Figures I-2 through I-6.

Page 62: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

AL

CAL CON

CK COR

MS

SPT DS

ST EI

MAX

RV

SA

UC

By:

Job Number:

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENT

SCRIPPS INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LEGEND

SILTS AND CLAYS

(Liquid Limit

greater than 50)

Figure:

Date: CTL

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

SOIL & TESTING, INC.

140510P3-1

11/17/2014

I-1

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART

SOIL DESCRIPTION

I. COARSE GRAINED, more than 50% of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size.

OL

GROUP

SYMBOLTYPICAL NAMES

GW Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines

GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures.

Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines.

Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures.

SW Well graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines.

GRAVELS

More than half of

coarse fraction is

larger than No. 4

sieve size but

smaller than 3".GRAVELS WITH FINES

(Appreciable amount of

fines)

CLEAN GRAVELS

GP

GM

Organic silts and organic silty clays or low plasticity.

PT Peat and other highly organic soils.III. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS

MH

CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays.

Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils,

elastic silts.

OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity.

ML

CLEAN SANDS

Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-

sand mixtures with slight plasticity.

CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays,

silty clays, lean clays.

SILTS AND CLAYS

(Liquid Limit less

than 50)

II. FINE GRAINED, more than 50% of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size.

SM

SC

Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silty mixtures.

Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures.

SANDS

More than half of

coarse fraction is

smaller than No.

4 sieve size.

Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines.SP

FIELD SAMPLE SYMBOLS

- Modified California penetration test sampler

- Water seepage at time of excavation or as indicated

LABORATORY TEST SYMBOLS

- Bulk Sample

- Water level at time of excavation or as indicated

- Expansion Index

- Undisturbed chunk sample

- Maximum Size of Particle

- Maximum Density

- R Value

- Sieve Analysis

- Standard penetration test sampler

- Shelby Tube

- Atterberg Limits

- Consolidation

- Corrosivity Test

- Sulfate

- Chloride

- pH and Resistivity

- Direct Shear

- Unconfined Compression

Page 63: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Date Excavated: Logged by:

Equipment: Project Manager:

Surface Elevation (ft): 162 Depth to Water (ft):

DR

IVE

N

BU

LK

MO

IST

UR

E (

%)

DR

Y U

NIT

WT

. (p

cf)

4" ASPHALT CONCRETE

CL

CAL 37 17.5 106

CL

SPT 9

SPT 35

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

SOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date:

Job Number: 140510P3-1 Figure:

Tripod, 6" Dia. Solid Stem Auger

RV

COR

COLLUVIUM (Qcol): SANDY LEAN CLAY, olive brown, trace

gravel, moist, soft to medium stiff.

I-2

3

2

11/17/2014

7

9

5

CTL

10

8

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS

SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

6

4

1

BORING LOG CONTINUED ON FIGURE I-3

LOG OF BORING NUMBER B-1D

EP

TH

(ft)

US

CS

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

SAMPLES

10/24/2014 DAS

Not Encountered

TBC

DR

IVIN

G R

ES

IST

AN

CE

(blo

ws/f

oo

t o

f d

rive

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

TE

ST

S

FILL (af): SANDY LEAN CLAY, olive brown, trace gravel, moist,

medium stiff.

SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc): SANDY SILTSTONE to SANDY

CLAYSTONE, grayish brown, fractured, moist, hard.

Page 64: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Date Excavated: Logged by:Equipment: Project Manager:Surface Elevation (ft): 162 Depth to Water (ft):

DR

IVEN

BULK

MO

ISTU

RE

(%)

DR

Y U

NIT

WT.

(pcf

)

SPT 75/10"

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date:

Job Number: 140510P3-1 Figure:

Tripod, 6" Dia. Solid Stem Auger

I-3

13

12

11/17/2014

17

19

15

CTL

20

18

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

16

14

REFUSAL AT 12½ FEET

11

LOG OF BORING NUMBER B-1 (CONTINUED)D

EPTH

(ft)

USC

S

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

SAMPLES

10/24/2014 DAS

Not EncounteredTBC

DR

IVIN

G R

ES

ISTA

NC

E

(blo

ws/

foot

of d

rive)

LABO

RAT

OR

Y TE

STS

SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc): SANDY SILTSTONE to SANDY CLAYSTONE, grayish brown, fractured, moist, hard.

Page 65: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Date Excavated: Logged by:Equipment: Project Manager:Surface Elevation (ft): 168 Depth to Water (ft):

DR

IVEN

BULK

MO

ISTU

RE

(%)

DR

Y U

NIT

WT.

(pcf

)

CL

CAL 31

SPT 50/6"

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date:

Job Number: 140510P3-1 Figure:

Tripod, 6" Dia. Solid Stem Auger

FILL (af): SANDY LEAN CLAY, tan, trace gravel, moist, medium stiff.

I-4

3

2

11/17/2014

7

9

5

CTL

20

8

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

6

4

REFUSAL AT 5½ FEET

1

LOG OF BORING NUMBER B-2D

EPTH

(ft)

USC

S

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

SAMPLES

10/24/2014 DAS

Not EncounteredTBC

DR

IVIN

G R

ES

ISTA

NC

E

(blo

ws/

foot

of d

rive)

LABO

RAT

OR

Y TE

STS

SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc): SANDY SILTSTONE to SANDY CLAYSTONE, mottled orangish brown and gray, trace gravel, fractured, moist, hard.

SA AL EIDS

Page 66: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Date Excavated: Logged by:Equipment: Project Manager:Surface Elevation (ft): 165 Depth to Water (ft):

DR

IVEN

BULK

MO

ISTU

RE

(%)

DR

Y U

NIT

WT.

(pcf

)

CL

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date:

Job Number: 140510P3-1 Figure:

1

LOG OF TEST PIT NUMBER TP-1D

EPTH

(ft)

USC

S

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

SAMPLES

10/24/2014 DAS

Not EncounteredTBC

DR

IVIN

G R

ES

ISTA

NC

E

(blo

ws/

foot

of d

rive)

LABO

RAT

OR

Y TE

STS

SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc): SANDY SILTSTONE to SANDY CLAYSTONE, gray to brown, trace gravel, moderately fractured, moist, hard.

I-5

3

2

11/17/2014

7

9

5

CTL

20

8

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

6

4

REFUSAL AT 3 FEET

Hand Tools

FILL (af): SANDY LEAN CLAY, tan, trace gravel, moist, stiff.

Page 67: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Date Excavated: Logged by:Equipment: Project Manager:Surface Elevation (ft): 175½ Depth to Water (ft):

DR

IVEN

BULK

MO

ISTU

RE

(%)

DR

Y U

NIT

WT.

(pcf

)

CL

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date:

Job Number: 140510P3-1 Figure:

1

LOG OF TEST PIT NUMBER TP-2D

EPTH

(ft)

USC

S

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

SAMPLES

10/24/2014 DAS

Not EncounteredTBC

DR

IVIN

G R

ES

ISTA

NC

E

(blo

ws/

foot

of d

rive)

LABO

RAT

OR

Y TE

STS

I-6

3

2

11/17/2014

7

9

5

CTL

20

8

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

6

4REFUSAL AT 3½ FEET

Hand Tools

FILL (af): SANDY LEAN CLAY, tan to medium brown, trace gravel, moist, soft to medium stiff.

SCRIPPS FORMATION (Tsc): SANDY SILTSTONE to SANDY CLAYSTONE, gray and orange, trace gravel, moist, hard.

Page 68: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

APPENDIX II

APPENDIX II LABORATORY TESTING

Laboratory tests were performed to provide geotechnical parameters for engineering analyses. The following tests were performed:

• CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System.

• IN SITU MOISTURE AND DENSITY: The in situ moisture content and dry unit weight were determined on samples collected from the borings. The test results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix I.

• GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION: The grain size distribution was determined on one sample in accordance with ASTM D422. Figure II-1 presents the test results.

• ATTERBERG LIMITS: The Atterberg limits were determined on one sample in accordance with ASTM D4318. Figure II-1 presents the test results.

• R-VALUE: An R-value test was performed on one sample in accordance with California Test Method 301. Figure II-2 presents the test result.

• EXPANSION INDEX: The expansion index was determined on one sample in accordance with ASTM D4829. Figure II-2 presents the test results.

• CORROSIVITY: Corrosivity tests were performed on one sample. The pH and minimum resistivity were determined in general accordance with California Test 643. The soluble sulfate content was determined in accordance with California Test 417. The total chloride ion content was determined in accordance with California Test 422. Figure II-2 presents the test results.

• DIRECT SHEAR: A direct shear test was performed on one sample in accordance with ASTM D3080. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of 0.003 inch per minute. Figure II-3 presents the test results.

Soil samples not tested are now stored in our laboratory for future reference and analysis, if needed. Unless notified to the contrary, all samples will be disposed of 30 days from the date of this report.

Page 69: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

412318

Date:Job Number: Figure:

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTSSCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

SANDY LEAN CLAYDESCRIPTION

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL & TESTING, INC.

140510P3-111/17/14

II-1By: CTL

CL ATTERBERG LIMITSLIQUID LIMIT

PLASTIC LIMITPLASTICITY INDEX

SAMPLE LOCATION UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION:B-2 at 0 Feet to 5 Feet

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.010.11101001000Grain Size in Millimeters

U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes

Perc

ent F

iner

by

Wei

ght

Cobbles GravelCoarse Fine

SandCoarse Medium Fine

Silt or Clay

6" 3" 3/4" 1-½" 3/8" #4 #10 #8 #30 #16 #50 #40 #100 #200

Page 70: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

CLASSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL 1

2. ACI 318, Table 4.2.1

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL & TESTING, INC. Date:

Job Number: Figure: II-211/17/14

140510P3-1

EXPANSION INDEX POTENTIAL EXPANSION

91 - 130 HighAbove 130 Very High

1. ASTM - D4829

1 - 20 Very Low21 - 50

CTL

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

By:

Low51 - 90 Medium

RESISTIVITY, pH, SOLUBLE CHLORIDE and SOLUBLE SULFATE

S0 Not applicable

8.1 0.045 0.006

S3 Very Severe

820

R-VALUECALIFORNIA TEST 301

SANDY SILT to SANDY LEAN CLAY 62B-2 at 0 Feet to 5 Feet

SAMPLEASTM D2489

EXPANSION INDEX

EXPANSION INDEX

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION R- VALUEB-1 at 0 Feet to 3 Feet SANDY LEAN CLAY 17

DESCRIPTION

B-1 at 0 Feet to 5 Feet

Water-Soluble Sulfate (SO4) in Soil, Percent by Mass

SO4 < 0.10

0.10 ≤ SO4 < 0.20

0.20 ≤ SO4 ≤ 2.00

SULFATE EXPOSURE CLASSES 2

Class Severity

SO4 > 2.00

S1 Moderate

S2 Severe

SAMPLERESISTIVITY

(Ω-cm)pH

SOLUBLE CHLORIDE (%)

SOLUBLE SULFATE (%)

Page 71: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

INTERNAL COHESION

FRICTION INTERCEPT

DESCRIPTION ANGLE(DEG.) (PSF)

Shear Strength at 0.2 inches of Deformation: 37 321

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

SOIL & TESTING, INC. By: Date: 11/17/2014

Job Number: Figure: II-3

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS

SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

IN SITU SANDY

SILTSTONE to SANDY

CLAYSTONE

B-2 at 2 Feet

SAMPLE

CTL

140510P3-1

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0

Sh

ear

Str

ess

(k

sf)

Confining Pressure (ksf)

Direct Shear Test Results

Shear Strength at 0.2 inches ofDeformation

Page 72: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Corporate Headquarters

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120

Toll Free: 877.215.4321

www.scst.com

San Diego Los Angeles Inland Empire Central Valley

November 18, 2014 SCS&T No. 140510P3

Report No. 2

Mr. Rosalie Pham, P.E.

Principal Electrical Engineer

University of California, San Diego

Facilities Design and Construction

10280 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 470

La Jolla, California 92037 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS TESTING

EMERGENCY POWER IMPROVEMENTS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA UCSD JOB NO. 4746

Dear Rosalie:

In accordance with your authorization, Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCS&T) collected

environmental soil samples from the two borings and two test pits excavated on October 24, 2014

for the subject project. Figure 1 shows the approximate locations of the borings and test pits. The

soil samples were placed in 4-ounce jars, labeled, stored in an insulated cooler with ice, and

transported under chain-of-custody to Eurofins | Calscience for analytical testing. The sampling

equipment was decontaminated between samples to reduce the likelihood of cross-contamination.

The environmental test results are presented in the attached analytical report.

We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. If you have any questions

concerning this report, or need additional services, please call me at (619) 280-4321.

Respectfully Submitted,

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 6/30/15

Thomas B. Canady, PE 50057 Principal Engineer TBC:aw Attachments: Figure 1 - Subsurface Exporation Map

Eurofins | Calscience Analytical Report (1) Addressee via e-mail at [email protected]

Page 73: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu
Page 74: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

WORK ORDER NUMBER: 14-10-2120

Analytical Report ForClient: Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

Client Project Name: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement /SCS&T No. 140510P3

Attention: Tom Canady6280 Riverdale StreetSan Diego, CA 92120-3308

Approved for release on by:Richard VillafaniaProject Manager

AIR SOIL WATER MARINE CHEMISTRY

Eurofins Calscience, Inc. (Calscience) certifies that the test results provided in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which accreditation isrequired or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The original report of subcontracted analyses, if any, is attached tothis report. The results in this report are limited to the sample(s) tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. The client or recipient of thisreport is specifically prohibited from making material changes to said report and, to the extent that such changes are made, Calscience is not responsible, legally orotherwise. The client or recipient agrees to indemnify Calscience for any defense to any litigation which may arise.

11/03/2014

Page 1 of 35

Page 75: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Contents

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Client Project Name: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&T No. 140510P3

Work Order Number: 14-10-2120

1 Work Order Narrative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 Client Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.1 EPA 8015B (M) C8-C40 (Solid). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.2 EPA 6010B/7471A CAC Title 22 Metals (Solid). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142.3 EPA 7471A Mercury (Solid). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3 Quality Control Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263.1 MS/MSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263.2 LCS/LCSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

4 Sample Analysis Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

5 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

6 Chain-of-Custody/Sample Receipt Form. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Page 2 of 35

Page 76: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Condition Upon Receipt: Samples were received under Chain-of-Custody (COC) on 10/27/14. They were assigned to Work Order 14-10-2120. Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good condition and within the

recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are

integral elements of the analytical report and are presented at the back of the report. Holding Times: All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the Calscience Sample Acceptance

Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or comprehensive case narrative, if required. Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15

minutes (40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being

received outside of the stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time. Quality Control: All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in the QC summary forms or

described further within this report. Additional Comments: Air - Sorbent-extracted air methods (EPA TO-4A, EPA TO-10, EPA TO-13A, EPA TO-17): Analytical results are converted from

mass/sample basis to mass/volume basis using client-supplied air volumes. New York NELAP air certification does not certify for all reported methods and analytes, reference the accredited items here:

http://www.calscience.com/PDF/New_York.pdf Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC

results are always reported on a wet weight basis. Subcontractor Information: Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted.

Work Order Narrative

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 14-10-2120 Page 1 of 1

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 3 of 35

Page 77: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@2' 14-10-2120-1-A 10/24/1411:15

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1413:33

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 96 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 1 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 4 of 35

Page 78: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@5' 14-10-2120-2-A 10/24/1411:35

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1413:51

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 94 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 2 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 5 of 35

Page 79: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@10' 14-10-2120-3-A 10/24/1411:55

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1414:10

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 98 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 3 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 6 of 35

Page 80: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-2@2' 14-10-2120-4-A 10/24/1409:40

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1414:28

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 87 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 4 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 7 of 35

Page 81: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-2@5' 14-10-2120-5-A 10/24/1410:00

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1414:46

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 92 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 5 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 8 of 35

Page 82: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-1@1' 14-10-2120-6-A 10/24/1413:10

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1411:10

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 7.6 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 12 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 36 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 41 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 46 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total 150 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 87 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 6 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 9 of 35

Page 83: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-1@3' 14-10-2120-7-A 10/24/1413:30

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1411:28

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 6.1 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 18 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 26 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total 50 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 101 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 7 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 10 of 35

Page 84: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-2@2' 14-10-2120-8-A 10/24/1413:00

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1411:47

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 4.9 1.00

C9-C10 ND 4.9 1.00

C11-C12 ND 4.9 1.00

C13-C14 ND 4.9 1.00

C15-C16 ND 4.9 1.00

C17-C18 ND 4.9 1.00

C19-C20 ND 4.9 1.00

C21-C22 ND 4.9 1.00

C23-C24 ND 4.9 1.00

C25-C28 ND 4.9 1.00

C29-C32 5.2 4.9 1.00

C33-C36 5.8 4.9 1.00

C37-C40 12 4.9 1.00

C8-C40 Total 26 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 96 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 8 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 11 of 35

Page 85: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-2@3' 14-10-2120-9-A 10/24/1413:15

Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/31/1412:05

141028B07A

Comment(s): - The total concentration includes individual carbon range concentrations (estimated), if any, below the RL reported as ND.

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 94 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 9 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 12 of 35

Page 86: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

Method Blank 099-15-500-58 N/A Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/30/1413:13

141028B07A

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

C8 ND 5.0 1.00

C9-C10 ND 5.0 1.00

C11-C12 ND 5.0 1.00

C13-C14 ND 5.0 1.00

C15-C16 ND 5.0 1.00

C17-C18 ND 5.0 1.00

C19-C20 ND 5.0 1.00

C21-C22 ND 5.0 1.00

C23-C24 ND 5.0 1.00

C25-C28 ND 5.0 1.00

C29-C32 ND 5.0 1.00

C33-C36 ND 5.0 1.00

C37-C40 ND 5.0 1.00

C8-C40 Total ND 5.0 1.00

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 91 61-145

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 10 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 13 of 35

Page 87: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@2' 14-10-2120-1-A 10/24/1411:15

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:27

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.739 0.985

Arsenic 11.0 0.739 0.985

Barium 60.1 0.493 0.985

Beryllium 0.662 0.246 0.985

Cadmium ND 0.493 0.985

Chromium 14.8 0.246 0.985

Cobalt 9.05 0.246 0.985

Copper 23.8 0.493 0.985

Lead 16.8 0.493 0.985

Molybdenum ND 0.246 0.985

Nickel 13.2 0.246 0.985

Selenium ND 0.739 0.985

Silver ND 0.246 0.985

Thallium ND 0.739 0.985

Vanadium 27.2 0.246 0.985

Zinc 63.4 0.985 0.985

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 1 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 14 of 35

Page 88: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@5' 14-10-2120-2-A 10/24/1411:35

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:32

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.743 0.990

Arsenic 7.14 0.743 0.990

Barium 73.0 0.495 0.990

Beryllium 0.614 0.248 0.990

Cadmium ND 0.495 0.990

Chromium 16.9 0.248 0.990

Cobalt 8.62 0.248 0.990

Copper 19.9 0.495 0.990

Lead 13.1 0.495 0.990

Molybdenum ND 0.248 0.990

Nickel 12.8 0.248 0.990

Selenium ND 0.743 0.990

Silver ND 0.248 0.990

Thallium ND 0.743 0.990

Vanadium 32.3 0.248 0.990

Zinc 66.3 0.990 0.990

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 2 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 15 of 35

Page 89: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@10' 14-10-2120-3-A 10/24/1411:55

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:33

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.739 0.985

Arsenic 4.87 0.739 0.985

Barium 37.4 0.493 0.985

Beryllium 0.492 0.246 0.985

Cadmium ND 0.493 0.985

Chromium 13.6 0.246 0.985

Cobalt 9.16 0.246 0.985

Copper 15.6 0.493 0.985

Lead 10.4 0.493 0.985

Molybdenum ND 0.246 0.985

Nickel 11.0 0.246 0.985

Selenium ND 0.739 0.985

Silver ND 0.246 0.985

Thallium ND 0.739 0.985

Vanadium 30.2 0.246 0.985

Zinc 52.7 0.985 0.985

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 3 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 16 of 35

Page 90: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-2@2' 14-10-2120-4-A 10/24/1409:40

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:35

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony 1.50 0.743 0.990

Arsenic 13.9 0.743 0.990

Barium 69.0 0.495 0.990

Beryllium 0.647 0.248 0.990

Cadmium ND 0.495 0.990

Chromium 20.6 0.248 0.990

Cobalt 4.50 0.248 0.990

Copper 37.8 0.495 0.990

Lead 26.9 0.495 0.990

Molybdenum ND 0.248 0.990

Nickel 6.79 0.248 0.990

Selenium ND 0.743 0.990

Silver ND 0.248 0.990

Thallium ND 0.743 0.990

Vanadium 48.7 0.248 0.990

Zinc 56.3 0.990 0.990

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 4 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 17 of 35

Page 91: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-2@5' 14-10-2120-5-A 10/24/1410:00

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:36

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.746 0.995

Arsenic 13.0 0.746 0.995

Barium 54.7 0.498 0.995

Beryllium 0.714 0.249 0.995

Cadmium ND 0.498 0.995

Chromium 18.2 0.249 0.995

Cobalt 11.4 0.249 0.995

Copper 30.9 0.498 0.995

Lead 28.0 0.498 0.995

Molybdenum ND 0.249 0.995

Nickel 11.0 0.249 0.995

Selenium ND 0.746 0.995

Silver ND 0.249 0.995

Thallium ND 0.746 0.995

Vanadium 39.2 0.249 0.995

Zinc 73.3 0.995 0.995

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 5 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 18 of 35

Page 92: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-1@1' 14-10-2120-6-A 10/24/1413:10

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:23

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony 1.02 0.750 1.00

Arsenic 9.29 0.750 1.00

Barium 64.9 0.500 1.00

Beryllium 0.564 0.250 1.00

Cadmium ND 0.500 1.00

Chromium 12.8 0.250 1.00

Cobalt 7.47 0.250 1.00

Copper 20.9 0.500 1.00

Lead 16.0 0.500 1.00

Molybdenum 0.252 0.250 1.00

Nickel 10.0 0.250 1.00

Selenium ND 0.750 1.00

Silver ND 0.250 1.00

Thallium ND 0.750 1.00

Vanadium 25.5 0.250 1.00

Zinc 56.8 1.00 1.00

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 6 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 19 of 35

Page 93: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-1@3' 14-10-2120-7-A 10/24/1413:30

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:37

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.769 1.03

Arsenic 7.72 0.769 1.03

Barium 62.4 0.513 1.03

Beryllium 0.610 0.256 1.03

Cadmium ND 0.513 1.03

Chromium 15.6 0.256 1.03

Cobalt 8.98 0.256 1.03

Copper 20.3 0.513 1.03

Lead 17.1 0.513 1.03

Molybdenum ND 0.256 1.03

Nickel 13.1 0.256 1.03

Selenium ND 0.769 1.03

Silver ND 0.256 1.03

Thallium ND 0.769 1.03

Vanadium 30.6 0.256 1.03

Zinc 66.4 1.03 1.03

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 7 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 20 of 35

Page 94: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-2@2' 14-10-2120-8-A 10/24/1413:00

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:38

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.761 1.02

Arsenic 7.27 0.761 1.02

Barium 66.6 0.508 1.02

Beryllium 0.540 0.254 1.02

Cadmium ND 0.508 1.02

Chromium 15.1 0.254 1.02

Cobalt 9.01 0.254 1.02

Copper 20.4 0.508 1.02

Lead 20.4 0.508 1.02

Molybdenum 0.261 0.254 1.02

Nickel 11.7 0.254 1.02

Selenium ND 0.761 1.02

Silver ND 0.254 1.02

Thallium ND 0.761 1.02

Vanadium 28.6 0.254 1.02

Zinc 67.9 1.02 1.02

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 8 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 21 of 35

Page 95: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-2@3' 14-10-2120-9-A 10/24/1413:15

Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1414:39

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony 1.21 0.754 1.01

Arsenic 6.83 0.754 1.01

Barium 59.9 0.503 1.01

Beryllium 0.622 0.251 1.01

Cadmium ND 0.503 1.01

Chromium 15.5 0.251 1.01

Cobalt 10.7 0.251 1.01

Copper 21.8 0.503 1.01

Lead 15.1 0.503 1.01

Molybdenum ND 0.251 1.01

Nickel 13.0 0.251 1.01

Selenium ND 0.754 1.01

Silver ND 0.251 1.01

Thallium ND 0.754 1.01

Vanadium 32.2 0.251 1.01

Zinc 64.5 1.01 1.01

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 9 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 22 of 35

Page 96: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

Method Blank 097-01-002-19599 N/A Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/1413:53

141030L01

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Antimony ND 0.750 1.00

Arsenic ND 0.750 1.00

Barium ND 0.500 1.00

Beryllium ND 0.250 1.00

Cadmium ND 0.500 1.00

Chromium ND 0.250 1.00

Cobalt ND 0.250 1.00

Copper ND 0.500 1.00

Lead ND 0.500 1.00

Molybdenum ND 0.250 1.00

Nickel ND 0.250 1.00

Selenium ND 0.750 1.00

Silver ND 0.250 1.00

Thallium ND 0.750 1.00

Vanadium ND 0.250 1.00

Zinc ND 1.00 1.00

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 10 of 10

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 23 of 35

Page 97: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

B-1@2' 14-10-2120-1-A 10/24/1411:15

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:33

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0847 1.00

B-1@5' 14-10-2120-2-A 10/24/1411:35

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:35

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0862 1.00

B-1@10' 14-10-2120-3-A 10/24/1411:55

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:37

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0847 1.00

B-2@2' 14-10-2120-4-A 10/24/1409:40

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:39

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury 0.230 0.0806 1.00

B-2@5' 14-10-2120-5-A 10/24/1410:00

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:41

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury 0.110 0.0820 1.00

TP-1@1' 14-10-2120-6-A 10/24/1413:10

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:26

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0833 1.00

TP-1@3' 14-10-2120-7-A 10/24/1413:30

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:48

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0833 1.00

TP-2@2' 14-10-2120-8-A 10/24/1413:00

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:50

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0833 1.00

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 7471A Total

Method: EPA 7471A

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 1 of 2

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 24 of 35

Page 98: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Client Sample Number Lab SampleNumber

Date/TimeCollected

Matrix Instrument DatePrepared

Date/TimeAnalyzed

QC Batch ID

TP-2@3' 14-10-2120-9-A 10/24/1413:15

Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:53

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0833 1.00

Method Blank 099-16-272-682 N/A Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/1418:22

141030L05

Parameter Result RL DF Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.0833 1.00

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 7471A Total

Method: EPA 7471A

Units: mg/kg

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 2 of 2

RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 25 of 35

Page 99: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Quality Control Sample ID Type Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

14-10-2031-2 Sample Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/30/14 14:42 141028S07

14-10-2031-2 Matrix Spike Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/30/14 13:49 141028S07

14-10-2031-2 Matrix Spike Duplicate Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/30/14 14:07 141028S07

Parameter SampleConc.

SpikeAdded

MSConc.

MS%Rec.

MSDConc.

MSD%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel ND 400.0 410.0 102 428.9 107 71-125 5 0-12

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 1 of 3

RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 26 of 35

Page 100: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Quality Control Sample ID Type Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

TP-1@1' Sample Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/14 14:23 141030S01

TP-1@1' Matrix Spike Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/14 14:25 141030S01

TP-1@1' Matrix Spike Duplicate Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/14 14:26 141030S01

Parameter SampleConc.

SpikeAdded

MSConc.

MS%Rec.

MSDConc.

MSD%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Antimony 1.025 25.00 10.44 38 10.59 38 50-115 1 0-20 3

Arsenic 9.286 25.00 30.19 84 31.94 91 75-125 6 0-20

Barium 64.91 25.00 87.06 89 87.13 89 75-125 0 0-20

Beryllium 0.5643 25.00 25.71 101 26.29 103 75-125 2 0-20

Cadmium ND 25.00 24.24 97 24.78 99 75-125 2 0-20

Chromium 12.77 25.00 35.80 92 36.26 94 75-125 1 0-20

Cobalt 7.474 25.00 32.54 100 33.61 105 75-125 3 0-20

Copper 20.92 25.00 46.68 103 49.89 116 75-125 7 0-20

Lead 15.99 25.00 41.51 102 42.01 104 75-125 1 0-20

Molybdenum 0.2518 25.00 22.43 89 22.63 89 75-125 1 0-20

Nickel 10.02 25.00 34.57 98 35.37 101 75-125 2 0-20

Selenium ND 25.00 18.62 74 18.90 76 75-125 1 0-20 3

Silver ND 12.50 11.89 95 12.28 98 75-125 3 0-20

Thallium ND 25.00 15.89 64 15.57 62 75-125 2 0-20 3

Vanadium 25.52 25.00 47.94 90 48.90 94 75-125 2 0-20

Zinc 56.78 25.00 77.58 83 78.63 87 75-125 1 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 2 of 3

RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 27 of 35

Page 101: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Quality Control Sample ID Type Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

TP-1@1' Sample Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/14 18:26 141030S05

TP-1@1' Matrix Spike Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/14 18:28 141030S05

TP-1@1' Matrix Spike Duplicate Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/14 18:30 141030S05

Parameter SampleConc.

SpikeAdded

MSConc.

MS%Rec.

MSDConc.

MSD%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Mercury ND 0.8350 0.9111 109 0.9158 110 71-137 1 0-14

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 7471A Total

Method: EPA 7471A

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 3 of 3

RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 28 of 35

Page 102: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Quality Control Sample ID Type Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-15-500-58 LCS Solid GC 46 10/28/14 10/30/14 13:31 141028B07A

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 400.0 387.2 97 75-123

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3550B

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 1 of 3

RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 29 of 35

Page 103: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Total number of LCS compounds: 16

Total number of ME compounds: 0

Total number of ME compounds allowed: 1

LCS ME CL validation result: Pass

Quality Control Sample ID Type Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

097-01-002-19599 LCS Solid ICP 7300 10/30/14 10/31/14 13:54 141030L01

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL ME CL Qualifiers

Antimony 25.00 29.82 119 80-120 73-127

Arsenic 25.00 26.06 104 80-120 73-127

Barium 25.00 25.77 103 80-120 73-127

Beryllium 25.00 25.23 101 80-120 73-127

Cadmium 25.00 26.27 105 80-120 73-127

Chromium 25.00 26.70 107 80-120 73-127

Cobalt 25.00 28.62 114 80-120 73-127

Copper 25.00 26.05 104 80-120 73-127

Lead 25.00 27.47 110 80-120 73-127

Molybdenum 25.00 25.88 104 80-120 73-127

Nickel 25.00 27.82 111 80-120 73-127

Selenium 25.00 24.09 96 80-120 73-127

Silver 12.50 12.68 101 80-120 73-127

Thallium 25.00 26.35 105 80-120 73-127

Vanadium 25.00 25.94 104 80-120 73-127

Zinc 25.00 26.22 105 80-120 73-127

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 3050B

Method: EPA 6010B

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 2 of 3

RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 30 of 35

Page 104: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Quality Control Sample ID Type Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-16-272-682 LCS Solid Mercury 05 10/30/14 10/30/14 18:24 141030L05

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Mercury 0.8350 0.9118 109 85-121

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.

6280 Riverdale Street

San Diego, CA 92120-3308

Date Received: 10/27/14

Work Order: 14-10-2120

Preparation: EPA 7471A Total

Method: EPA 7471A

Project: 4746 SIO Emergency Power Improvement / SCS&TNo. 140510P3

Page 3 of 3

RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 31 of 35

Page 105: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Method Extraction Chemist ID Instrument Analytical Location

EPA 6010B EPA 3050B 469 ICP 7300 1

EPA 6010B EPA 3050B 771 ICP 7300 1

EPA 7471A EPA 7471A Total 915 Mercury 05 1

EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3550B 610 GC 46 1

Sample Analysis Summary Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 14-10-2120 Page 1 of 1

Location 1: 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 32 of 35

Page 106: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Qualifiers Definition

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

1 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample data was reported without furtherclarification.

2 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate spike compound wasin control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

3 Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to suspected matrix interference. Theassociated LCS recovery was in control.

4 The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

5 The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

BV Sample received after holding time expired.

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

HDH The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard but heavier hydrocarbonswere also present (or detected).

HDL The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard but lighter hydrocarbons werealso present (or detected).

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value isestimated.

JA Analyte positively identified but quantitation is an estimate.

ME LCS Recovery Percentage is within Marginal Exceedance (ME) Control Limit range (+/- 4 SD from the mean).

ND Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit.

Q Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spikeconcentration by a factor of four or greater.

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results arereported on a wet weight basis.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15 minutes(40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being received outside of thestated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

A calculated total result (Example: Total Pesticides) is the summation of each component concentration and/or, if "J" flags are reported,estimated concentration. Component concentrations showing not detected (ND) are summed into the calculated total result as zeroconcentrations.

Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 14-10-2120 Page 1 of 1

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 33 of 35

Page 107: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 34 of 35

Page 108: ~~F - rmp-public.ucsd.edu

Ret

urn

to C

onte

nts

Page 35 of 35