examination of states’ english language proficiency standards

28
Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 21, 2010 Ellen Forte Laura Kuti edCount, LLC 1

Upload: kay

Post on 12-Jan-2016

51 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards. National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 21, 2010 Ellen Forte Laura Kuti edCount, LLC. Background. Title III policy New with NCLB SEA role Systemic reform principles Academic English. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

National Conference on Student AssessmentDetroit, MI

June 21, 2010

Ellen ForteLaura Kuti

edCount, LLC

1

Page 2: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

BackgroundTitle III policy

New with NCLBSEA roleSystemic reform principlesAcademic English

2

Page 3: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Title III Requirements

States are required to :implement ELP standards that link to the language

demands inherent to academic standardsImplement annual ELP assessments aligned to ELP

standards that yield reading, writing, listening, speaking, and comprehension scores

establish an accountability system for LEAs reflecting expectations for progress toward, and attainment of, ELP goals and achievement in the core academic content areas

3

Page 4: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

BackgroundTitle III policy

New with NCLBSEA roleSystemic reform principlesAcademic English

First national evaluation of Title III implementationAmerican Institutes for Research and edCount, LLCMixed-method approach

4

Page 5: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

National Evaluation of Title IIIInterviews with state Title III directors from all 50

states and the District of ColumbiaSurvey of 1,300 Title III districtsDistrict case studies in five states (NY, NC, MN, NM, CA)Analysis of longitudinal student achievement data

from six states and two large districtsReview of each state’s ELP standards

5

Page 6: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

ELP Standards Review: Guiding QuestionsHow are states’ ELP standards structured to address

expectations from Kindergarten through grade 12 in each of the reading, writing, speaking, and listening domains as required under ESEA?

How are states’ ELP standards designed to support the achievement of academic achievement standards as required under ESEA?

How do states’ ELP standards reflect the principles of academic English language acquisition?

How accessible are states’ ELP standards to educators for curriculum and assessment development?

6

Page 7: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

ELP Standards Review: MethodLiterature reviewConsultation with Technical Working Group members and

the U.S. Department of EducationProtocol developmentTrainingPilotProtocol refinementTraining2 independent reviewers and a third reviewer who

assisted in resolving discrepancies

7

Page 8: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

ELP Standards Review: Data CollectionStandards in effect for the 2008-09 school year

20 states used the Access for ELLs ELP assessment19 states used custom-made ELP assessments7 states used the ELDA (standards not common across

states)5 states used LAS Links

31 sets of standards and supplemental documents collected from states’ Department of Education websites30 states 1 set for the 20 2008-09 WIDA states

8

Page 9: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

ELP Standards Review: Guiding QuestionsHow are states’ ELP standards structured to address

expectations from Kindergarten through grade 12 in each of the reading, writing, speaking, and listening domains as required under ESEA?

How are states’ ELP standards designed to support the achievement of academic achievement standards as required under ESEA?

How do states’ ELP standards reflect the principles of academic English language acquisition?

How accessible are states’ ELP standards to educators for curriculum and assessment development?

9

Page 10: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Organization across grade levels

Grade-range clustersInclusion of Pre-K

10

How are states’ ELP standards structured to address expectations from Kindergarten through grade 12 in each of the reading, writing, speaking, and listening domains as required under ESEA?

Manifestation of reading, writing, speaking, and listening domains

Each domain separateTwo domains

combinedNo distinction

Page 11: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Language Domains: Example

11

Page 12: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

12

How are states’ ELP standards designed to support the achievement of academic achievement standards as required under ESEA?

1. Basic philosophy of the domain

2. Degree to which ELP standards include specific connections to the language of the content areas

3. Reflection of specific components of academic English

Page 13: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

13

How are states’ ELP standards designed to support the achievement of academic achievement standards as required under ESEA?

1. Basic philosophy of the domain

A. Focus on social language of school and some aspects of academic language

B. Focus on social and academic language of school and based on English/Language Arts (ELA) Standards

C. Approach 2 with some additional focus on other academic content areas beyond ELA

D. Integrated Content Area Standards with Academic English Focus

Page 14: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

14

2. Degree to which ELP standards include specific connections to the language of the content areas

A. English language artsB. MathematicsC. ScienceD. Social Studies

How are states’ ELP standards designed to support the achievement of academic achievement standards as required under ESEA?

Page 15: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Example of Linkages to Content Areas

“Connect events with people in

U.S. history using timelines,

graphics or illustrations”

“Select examples of rights or

responsibilities of people in U.S. or other

countries using illustrations and written

descriptions”

“Draw conclusions about resources or

agricultural products on maps or graphs

described orally from grade-level material”

15

Page 16: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Example of Linkages to Content Areas

16

Page 17: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

17

3. Reflection of specific components of academic English(Scarcella, 2003)

A. Phonological Component (sounds, stress, intonation)B. Lexical Component (meaning of words)C. Grammatical Component (morphemes, syntax, rules of

punctuation)D. Functional Component (discourse features and

functions of language)

How are states’ ELP standards designed to support the achievement of academic achievement standards as required under ESEA?

Page 18: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Language Skills and Functions: Phonological, Lexical, and Vocabulary Example

18

Page 19: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Language Skills and Functions: Discourse Example

19

Page 20: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

20

TESOL Language Learning Principles:1. Language is functional.2. Language varies.3. Language learning is cultural learning.4. Language acquisition is a long-term process.5. Language acquisition occurs through meaningful use and

interaction.6. Language processes develop interdependently. 7. Native language proficiency contributes to second language

acquisition.8. Bilingualism is an individual and societal asset.

How do states’ ELP standards reflect the principles of academic English language acquisition?

Page 21: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Language Development Principles: Example of Principle 3, Cultural Learning

21

Page 22: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Language Development Principles: Example of Principle 5, Meaningful Use and Interaction

“3. Request and provide information

and assistance, orally or in writing, for

personal, social, and academic purposes. (L,

S, R, W)”

“6. Understand and use a variety of oral communication strategies in American English

for various social and academic purposes.

Such strategies include indicating lack of understanding,

clarifying or requesting clarification, restatement, and

checking listeners’ understanding.

(L, S, W)”22

Page 23: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Language Development Principles: Example of Principle 7, Native Language Proficiency

“One of the most reliable indicators of success in acquiring English is the level of language development in the student’s first language. A student with a highly

developed first language may compress the above timeline.””

23

Page 24: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

24

1. Clear descriptions or examples of performance indicators

2. Specific curricular suggestions

How accessible are states’ ELP standards to educators for curriculum and assessment development?

Page 25: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Support for Instruction: Performance Indicator Example

25

“Write a detailed

summary of a story.”

“Write persuasive compositions that structure

ideas and arguments in a logical way with consistent

use of standard grammatical forms.”

“Write pieces related to career

development (e.g., business letter, job

application, letter of inquiry).”

Page 26: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Support for Instruction: Curricular Suggestions Example

26

Page 27: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Future ConsiderationsStates need guidance on how to structure standards

and should incorporate current research on which to base their standards’ structure and content

Clear understanding of the construct of ELP and of academic English language

Inclusion of Pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten standards

Links between instruction, standards, and assessmentPeriodic reviews of the system

27

Page 28: Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Examination of States’ English Language Proficiency Standards

Ellen [email protected]

Laura [email protected]

28