evolution of outcome based procurement of... · evolution of outcome based procurement 2 •...

© Lean Construction Institute

Evolution of Outcome Based ProcurementMalvin Whang, UCSF & Andrew Mittleman, Jacobs EngineeringOctober 5, 2016


Evolution of Outcome Based Procurement

2

• ev·o·lu·tion - the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form

• out·come – the way a thing turns out; a consequence

• pro·cure·ment - the act of obtaining equipment, materials, or supplies


Objective

3

• Understand application of Plan Do Check Adjust (PDCA) process to project procurement

• Analyze procurement processes and their outcomes on projects

• Identify constraints in public contracting processes


Presenters

4

• Malvin Whang AIA, LEED AP• Senior Program Manager, Capital Programs• UCSF

• Andrew Mittleman, CCM, LEED Green Associate

• Senior Project Manager• Jacobs Engineering


UCSF Information

5

• University of California San Francisco• University of California• 10 campus University System• Health Science, Graduate schools• Medicine, Nursing, Dentistry & Pharmacy

• 11.56 Million GSF of space• $200M capital projects yearly• $2.7B in the next 5 years


Procurement Methods

6

• Project Delivery types• Design Bid Build• CM At Risk• Design Build• Job Order Contracting

• Procurement• Lump Sum• Best Value• Task Order Pricing


Project A

7

• CMAR with Design Build MEP

Owner A/E TeamQualifications

CM / GCBest Value

Elec DBBest Value

Mech DBBest Value

SubsLump Sum


Outcome

8

• MEP Bridging Documents• Design Assist vs Design Build

• Team selection in silos• Big Room Collaboration

• Lean Journey• Together vs Separate


Project H

9



CM / GCBest Value

Elec DBBest Value

Mech DBBest Value

SubsLump Sum


Outcome

10

• Countermeasures -

• MEP Bridging Documents• Design Criteria


• Lean Journey• Goal alignment workshop

• More issues

• Bids in silos• Optimization of the whole


Project C

11



CM / GCBest Value

Elec DBBest Value

Mech DBBest Value

SubsLump Sum


Outcome

12

• Countermeasures -

• MEP DB subs bid in teams• Reduce scope gaps• Optimize the system


• Lean Journey• Goal alignment workshop


Project O

13

• Design-Build with Performance Based Criteria

Owner

Design TeamQualifications

D-B Cont.Qualifications

Elec DBQualifications

StructuralQualifications

Mech / Plumbing

DBQualifications


Objective

14

• A starting point to create:• A Quality Work & Learning Environment• A Model of Architectural & Urban Design• A High Performing Building• Environmentally Sustainable• Durable & Long Lasting• Efficiently Serviced & Maintained• A Lean Program and Project Delivery Plan

• A plan and team to work with:• More than 10+ major owners• 6 Major projects within a 3 block radius• Over $1 billion in construction.• An aggressive development timeframe


Process

15


Outcome

16

• Design Build• Focus on Structural, MEP and Donor

Needs

• Clear Values• Full Design and Performance Criteria• Minimum acceptance levels

• Compatibility• Comprehensive Team Selection

• RFQ• Document Validation• RFP• Multiple Stakeholder Meetings

• Lean Journey• Started with the contract


Questions?

17