european water policy
DESCRIPTION
EUROPEAN WATER POLICY. An overview. EU water policy: where does it come from ?. Water directives: two different approaches. What next? Opening the floor for WFD. EUROPEAN WATER POLICY: 20 YEARS OF A RICH HISTORY. 2 /14. EU water policy: where does it come from ?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
EUROPEAN WATER POLICYEUROPEAN WATER POLICY
An overview
EUROPEAN WATER POLICY:20 YEARS OF A RICH HISTORY
What next?Opening the floor for WFD
Water directives:two different approaches
EU water policy: where does it come from ?
2/14
EUROPEAN WATER POLICY:20 YEARS OF A RICH HISTORY
EU water policy: where does it come from ?
Water directives:two different approaches
What next?Opening the floor for WFD3/14
THE BUILDING OF A COMPLETELY NEW
POLICY1972: a major milestone regarding
environmental policies
public policies hardly addressed environment
before first UN Conference
on the human environmentin Stockholm
Paris Conference initiated the elaboration of an
environmental common policy
preserving public health protecting the environment harmonising the
environmental rules within the Common market
First action programme
for the environment
Paris Conference initiated the elaboration of an
environmental common policy
Origins
4/14
THE BUILDING OF A COMPLETELY NEW
POLICY
A slow process to remove several constraints
environmental issues treated in the frame of economic integration
lack of legal basis for environmental policies
1986: environment becomes an autonomous policy
unanimity of the Council required for decision-making
1992 / 1999: power of decision progressively shared between Council and EP
Origins
5/14
LIMITS APPLYING TO EUROPEAN WATER POLICY
Water policy is an environmental
policy
Only qualitative issues are addressed
Lack of integration in major European
policies
Evolutions rely on society's concern for
environment
Origins
6/14
EUROPEAN WATER POLICY:20 YEARS OF A RICH HISTORY
EU water policy: where does it come from ?
Water directives:two different approaches
What next?Opening the floor for WFD7/14
TWO COMPETING APPROACHES
Two categories of directives in the water sector
Approach
Water quality objectives
Emission limit values
More "pragmatic"standards set with
regards to the natural capacity of dilution of
water at discharge point
More "ambitious"standards set as low as possible based on the
use of the best available technologies
8/14
THE "WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES " APPROACH
Ensure human health
… at the tap: drinking water directives (80/778/EEC - 15/07/1980 revised: 98/83/EC - 3/11/1998 )
… in the environment: bathing water directive (76/160/EEC - 8/12/1975; revision ongoing)
Protect the environment
directive on the quality of surface water intended for the abstraction of drinking water (75/440/EEC - 16/06/1975)
directive on the quality of fish water (78/659/EEC - 18/07/1978)
directive on the quality of shellfish waters (79/623/EEC - 30/10/1979)
to be repealed by WFD
Water quality standards are set to ensure the achievement of two main
goals
First wave of directives re.
water: between 1975 and
early 80'sApproac
h
9/14
THE "EMISSIONS LIMIT VALUES " APPROACH
A set of specific "water directives"
dangerous substances (76/464/EEC - 4/05/1976)
sewage sludge (86/278/EEC - 12/06/1986)
urban wastewater(91/271/EEC - 21/05/1991)
nitrates from agricultural origins (91/676/EEC - 12/12/1991)…
Second wave of directives re.
water: from 1976 to 1991
How to tackle pollution directly?
the quality of water declines in many places
punctual and diffuse emissions spread
Approach
Some"environmental
directives"plant protection products (91/414/EEC - 15/07/1991) IPPC (96/61/EC - 24/09/1996)
10/14
EUROPEAN WATER POLICY:20 YEARS OF A RICH HISTORY
Water directives:two different approaches
What next?Opening the floor for WFD
EU water policy: where does it come from ?
11/14
1990's: ON THE WAY TO WFD...
What next?
A new approach for water policies
concerns have changed a new concept arises: "integrated river basin
management "
An assessment of EU water policy
20 years, 30 directives: a pause is needed have initial goals been achieved? what cost for water policies?
12/14
A DECISION-MAKING PROCESS UNDER
PRESSUREJune 2000: conciliation
procedure
What next?
Mid-90's: intense debates on water policy
Proposal of WFD
Interest groups
Interest groups
European
Parliamen
t
After 1999:co-decision
1998-1999procedural
delay
Member
States
Before 1999:co-operation
6/1998political
agreement
13/14
What next?
14/14
ECONOMICS IN THE DEBATE
WFD combines both approaches
Two different visions
of the use of economics
as an element of the decision-making process ?
as a tool for the achievement of environmental objectives?
The principle of recovery of costs
degree of recovery: full or not?
scope for recovery: what sector?WFD requires to take it
into accountDiscussion opened at district scale on the
degree
GO FURTHER
Presentation of the main water directives
Chronology of WFD elaboration Main issues at stake during the debate
prior to the adoption of WFD
public health: determine common quality criteria and control rules for waters intended for human consumption
imperative quality standards monitoring requirements under member states' responsibility possibility for members states to adopt stricter criteria limited possibilities for temporary derogations
heavy investments in all member states for implementation general improvement of the quality of water distributed
THE FIRST DRINKING WATER DIRECTIVE
80/778/EEC - 15/07/1980
Objectives
Contents
Main results
Approach
integrate technical and scientific better capacities focus on public health
THE REVISED DRINKING WATER
DIRECTIVE98/83/EEC - 3/11/1998
Origins
Main changes
Comment
two types of standards:imperative (31): public health drivenindicative (25): indicators of water treatment plants'
performance several changes legal framework for the management of non conformities
80/778/EEC directive will be fully repealed in December 2003Approac
h
reduction and prevention of the pollution of bathing waters key concern: public health
THE BATHING WATER DIRECTIVE
76/160/EEC - 8/12/1975
Objectives
Contents
Result and Comment
minimum quality criteria sampling and analysis requirements possibility for MS to adopt more stringent values limited derogations
major improvement of the quality of European bathing waters
revision ongoing: more ambitious standards, global approach, better information of citizens...Approac
h
harmonise the legislation of MS take preventive action at source
THE DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES
DIRECTIVE76/464/EEC - 4/05/1976
Objectives
Contents
Result and Comment
monitoring of dangerous substances: list 1 (discharge to be ended) and list 2 (discharge to be reduced)
all discharges are subject to prior authorisation quality objectives and emission standards for list 1 daughter directives to ensure full implementation
derogations reduce the impact on the quality of waters low implementation and limited number of daughter
directives similar directive on groundwater: 80/68/EEC - 17/12/1979
Approach
ensure harmless use of sewage sludge in agriculture
THE SEWAGE SLUDGE DIRECTIVE
86/278/EEC - 12/06/1986
Objective
Contents
Result and Comment
use in agriculture is dependent on agronomic properties limit values for heavy metals in sludge and in the soil and
maximum annual quantities use of sewage sludge is restricted or prohibited where
potentially harmful to the environment frequent sampling and analysis of soil and sludge MS keep records with all relevant information
revision ongoingApproac
h
address one of the main sources of pollution of water
THE URBAN WASTEWATER DIRECTIVE
91/271/EEC - 21/05/1991
Objective
Contents
Results and Comments
tight timetable with ultimate deadline in 2005 the treatment of urban water is to be adapted according to
the sensitivity of the receiving waters MS' responsibility for monitoring both discharges from
treatment plants and receiving waters
very large scope: all areas over 2000 EH significant improvement in water quality but… level of
treatment often underestimated; lots of breaches of deadline debates regarding implementation costsApproac
h
reduce or prevent water pollution caused or induced by nitrates from agricultural sources (intensive livestock farming and crop growing)
THE NITRATES DIRECTIVE91/676/EEC - 12/12/1991
Objectives
Contents
Results and Comments
MS identify water (which could be) affected by pollution and vulnerable zones which contribute to pollution
possibility to set up action programme instead codes of good agricultural practice to be implemented by
farmers on a voluntary basis
ambitious objectives with comprehensive approach no connection with CAP lack of implementation: several cases before ECJ
Approach
setting uniform rules for authorising plant protection products
ultimately put out of the market the most dangerous ones
THE PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE
91/414/EEC - 15/07/1991
Objectives
Contents
Comments
list of active substances combined with an autorisation system
procedure for updating the list harmonised rules for labelling, placing on the market, etc.
specific attention paid to water
Approach
prevent or minimise air, water and soil pollution from highly polluting industrial installations
THE IPPC DIRECTIVE96/91/EEC - 24/09/1996
Objectives
Contents
Comments
obligations and procedure based on a licensing system setting of emission limit values transitional period until October 2007
amended in 2003 in order to ensure more public participation
Approach
THE WFD, THE CONCLUSION OF
A 10-YEAR PROCESS (A)Need for a global re-thinkingof the European water policy
Debates onseveral aspects
of EU water policy
implementation costs vs. achievements
too sectorial approach on-going revisions: drinking and
bathing waters, hazardous substances
requests for more subsidiarity concern about ECJ's pressure
Proposal for a directive on
the ecological quality
of water (COM(93)680 final)
no simplification and no clear coherence with the existing legal framework
no integrated approach yet high implementation costs
expectedearly
1990's
1994
What next?
THE WFD, THE CONCLUSION OF
A 10-YEAR PROCESS (B)Adoption
of WFD (2000(60)EC)
legally binding objectives; limited derogations
ambitious environmental objectives (2015) less stringent on pricing & hazardous
substancesProposal
of WFD (COM(97)49)
simplification: repeals several directives based on river basin stringent environmental objectives (2010) full cost recovery pricing of water uses
Abundant criticism Opening of a tough negotiation round
Discussions on the future ofEU water policy public hearings held by EP
Council's call for a framework text Commission's communication, roots of WFD
General agreement on leading principles1995-97
1997
2000
What next?
COMPETING EXPECTATIONS ON KEY ISSUES
European Parliamentfocus on results
Member statesfocus on implementation
Legally binding character of WFD
Regulatory text, "common" approach
Not too strict, high subsidiarity
vs.
Emissions of hazardous substances
Moderate approach Ambitious expectationsvs.
Deadlines for implementation
Close, very limited derogations
Very distant, extended derogations
vs.
Impact of WFD
Concern for all side-effects (social…)
Priority concern for watervs.What next?