ethics and society cs-1094 freshman seminar: computers and society instructor: jim allert
TRANSCRIPT
Ethics and Society
CS-1094 Freshman Seminar: Computers and Society
Instructor: Jim Allert
Introduction
Technology impacts society for good and for ill.
Examples?
Problem The real issue is in
how we manage technology.
Given an example of poor management of technology using old fashioned rules?
Why didn’t it work?
Social movements
Give and example of technologic innovations that changed entire social systems.
Were there opponents at the time? What were their arguments against it?
The Luddites Luddite From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The Luddites were a group of English workers in the early 1800s who protested the changes
produced by the Industrial Revolution that they felt threatened their jobs, often by destroying machines.
The original Luddites claimed to be led by one Ned Ludd, also known as "King Ludd", who is believed to have destroyed two large stocking-frames that produced inexpensive stockings undercutting those produced by skilled knitters, and whose signature appears on a "workers manifesto" of the time. Whether or not Ludd actually existed is historically unclear.
The movement spread rapidly throughout England in 1811, with many wool and cotton mills being destroyed, until the British government suppressed them harshly (including making "machine breaking" (industrial sabotage) a capital crime, and executing 17 men in 1813).
The terms Luddism, Luddite, (Also Neo-Luddism, Neo-Luddite) in recent years have become synonymous with anyone who opposes the advance of industrial technology.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PRluddites.htm
Luddites
New Moral DilemmasDr. Pierre Leveque, a French computer scientist visiting an American computer science department for one year, discovered a bug in themainframe computer operating system which allowed him to borrowthe identity of other users, by-passing their passwords. If a user whowas logged on left her terminal unattended briefly while Dr. Lavequewas in the room, he could enter a few keystrokes and forever gain accessto her files or have her billed for the time he used th computer. Havingdiscovered this bug, Dr. Leveque proceeded to collect as many identitiesas he could. He never abused the power he had; he neither read others’ filesnor billed his computing time to them.
When Dr. Leveque’s colleagues discovered what he had been doing and discussed the case among themselves they disagreed about how tocharacterize his behavior. Some believed it was morally wrong; others,although they felt uneasy about the behavior, could not justify condemningDr. Leveque when it seemed he had not hurt anyone. All agreed howeverthat he should be forced to destroy his access to those identities.
Approaching Moral Problems
Take the example of the computer science teacher who was caught accessing student accounts.
Was he wrong to do this? Does he deserve to be punished? What guidelines can we use for making our decisions
here? Conventional approaches
Utilitarianism Kant’s moral imperative
Utilitarianism
Utilitarian guidelines You judge an act by its
consequences Right or wrong depends on
the balance of harm versus benefit.
Examples How does this apply to the
computer scientist problem? Short-term utilitarian analysis Long term utilitarian analysis From the standpoint of the
perpetrator
John Stewart Mill1806-1873
Kant’s moral imperative
Kant’s guidelines You should always treat
others as ends in themselves, never as means to your own ends.
The fundamental principle is to respect the rights of other human beings, no matter what.
Examples
Immanuel Kant1724-1804
Modern Codified Rules
ACM guidelines for computing professionals
The role of legends and cautionary tales in stimulating the development of new rules.
The moral connotations of technology
Aristotle Believed that reason was
the most important part of life (above virtue, fame, wealth, enjoyment)
Work was ignoble. To be carried out by slaves.
The role of technology is to free us from ignoble tasks so that we may concentrate on higher aspirations.
Aristotle384-322 BC
The potential impact of computers
Work Economic justice Power Privacy Our sense of self
The impact of computers on work
Up side Makes work processes faster Allows for improvements in efficiency at all levels Maintains massive amounts of data Reduces workforce costs through telecommuting Increases productivity through flexible scheduling Computers create new jobs
Work (continued)
The down side Automation replaces or
deskills workers Constant and intrusive
employee monitoring Personnel data used for
purposes other than intended
Work at home often lowers salaries and benefits
Computers replace more jobs than they create
Impact on economic justice
Up side Information now flows freely over country
bordersComputers make world commerce possible
Open up global markets
Acceleration of progress in technology
Economic Justice (continued)
Down sideDominant classes use technology to become
stronger Increasing gap between the rich and poorWith only labor to sell the underprivileged
have less and less to sell
The impact of computers on power
Up sideBureaucracies can gather and handle more
dataExisting power structures are strengthenedLocal offices have more power and flexibility
Power (continued)
Down sidePolitical power can become centralized in one
organization or individualMore potential for information abuse
Impact on privacy
Up sideEasier to verify credentials and backgrounds
Example: bad checks
Useful in war or for national security
Privacy (continued)
Down sideMay squash creativity, personal growth and
progress if people are concerned about the implications of failure
A person’s record may follow them foreverHuman dignityMisinterpretation of an individual’s record
Impact of computers on our sense of self Who are we? Copernicus: We are
not the center of the universe.
Impact of computers on our sense of self Who are we?
Darwin: We are not the center of the natural world.
Impact of computers
on our sense of self Who are we
Marx and Freud: We do not even control of our own thoughts and actions.
Social structures and the unconscious
Impact of computers on our sense of self Who are we
Information revolution Human thought is
nothing special
The moral connotations of technology Aristotle
Believed that reason was the most important part of life (above virtue, fame, wealth, enjoyment)
Work was ignoble. To be carried out by slaves
Issue: What if technology allows machines to do all work for us? Have we arrived at the good life?
Issue: What if we invent machines who reason better than us? All that is left for us then is to be
workers.
Aristotle384-322 BC