Estate planning & planned giving

Download Estate planning & planned giving

Post on 17-Sep-2016




1 download


  • 31.








    & PL

    fers intary b


    American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsVolume 126, Number 3

    Sakima, Sakima, and Melsen 353ESTATE PLANNING

    Estate Planning: The AAO Foundation ofmembers and their advisors on a complimen

    Planned giving: Persons who are contempltheir estates are asked to contact the A424-2481, extension 246.Please remember the AAO FoundatioANNED GIVING

    formation on estate planning to AAOasis and at no obligation.

    a gift to the AAO Foundation throughbefore proceeding. Please call (800)oramic and lateral oblique radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol1995;24:225-31.Jonkman REG, van Waas MAJ, Plooij J, Kalk W. Measuringmandibular ridge reduction on oblique cephalometric radio-graphs. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;19:27-30.Verhoeven JW, Cune MS. Oblique lateral cephalometric radio-graphs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and accuracyof the technique in height measurements of mandibular bone invivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:39-43.Verhoeven JW, Ruijter J, Cune MS, Terlou M. Oblique lateralcephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology:usefulness and reproducibility of the technique in quantitativedensitometric measurements of mandible in vivo. Clin OralImplants Res 2000;11:476-86.Melnik AK. A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry ina longitudinally followed sample of growing children. Am JOrthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:355-66.Janson GRP, Metaxas A, Woodside DG, Freitas MR, Pinzan A.Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetriesin Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop 2001;119:406-18.Kyrkanides S, Richter L. Mandibular asymmetry and antigonialnotching in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate. CleftPalate Craniofac J 2002;39:30-5.Sakima MT. Comparative cephalometric evaluation of twotreatment strategies for deep overbite correction. An implantstudy [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sao Paulo: University of SaoPaulo State, Brazil; 1997.Castro AGB. Cephalometric study of the posterior anchorageunit in the canine retraction utilizing T loop, reverse vertical loop

    with helicoids and sliding mechanics [dissertation]. Araraquara,Sao Paulo: University of Sao Paulo State, Brazil; 1997.

    39. Fuziy A. Cephalometric study of three types of canine retraction[dissertation]. Araraquara, Sao Paulo: University of Sao PauloState, Brazil; 1997.

    40. Terada HH. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment for deepoverbite correction using the Ricketts methodan implant study[dissertation]. Araraquara, Sao Paulo: University of Sao PauloState, Brazil; 2001.

    41. Sakima PRT. Projection errors effects on the cephalometricmeasurements of the Steiner and McNamara analysis [disserta-tion]. Araraquara, Sao Paulo: University of Sao Paulo State,Brazil; 2001.

    42. Grayson BH, McCarthy TG, Bookstein F. Analysis of craniofa-cial asymmetry by multiplane cephalometry. Am J Orthod1983;84:217-24.

    43. Cook JT. Asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton. Br J Orthod1980;7:33-8.

    44. Baumrind S, Miller D, Molthen R. The reliability of head filmmeasurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. Am J Orthod 1976;70:617-44.

    45. Iseri H, Solow B. Average surface remodeling of the maxillarybase and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years.An implant study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:48-57.

    46. Nielsen IL. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of threemethods for cephalometric evaluations of growth and treatmentchange. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:422-31.

    47. Springate SD, Jones AG. The validity of two methods ofmandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum im-plants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:263-69.n in your estate planning.