epso complaints

31
epso complaints Results from the questionnaire epso complaints 5 2 2010

Upload: freira

Post on 25-Feb-2016

88 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

epso complaints. Results from the questionnaire. Complaints trajectory. Cork 2009 Candidatures working group Questionnaire Brussels 5/2/2010 Reporting to Epso. Position of the inspectorate. Most inspectorates can investigate individual complaints ; - some directly involved - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

epsocomplaints

Results from the questionnaire

Page 2: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Complaints trajectory

• Cork 2009

• Candidatures working group

• Questionnaire

• Brussels 5/2/2010

• Reporting to Epso

Page 3: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Position of the inspectorate

• Most inspectorates can investigate individual complaints;

- some directly involved

- some involved only as appeal instance

- some only in severe incidents

Page 4: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Role of Inspectorate in care provider’s complaints procedure

• Miscellaneous & various levels

• Sometimes Inspectorate must be mentioned in complaints procedure (address, contact number): Northern Ireland, Flanders (…)

Page 5: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Legislation on complaints inHealth Care

• Legal basis for the parties involved:-complainant-care provider-inspectorate(ombudsman)

Often: law on patients’ rights.

Page 6: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Information of the public

• In all countries public is informed of the possibility to lodge complaint

• More or less active information• Various ways of information:-posters, folders, leaflets-websites-other (media, conferences,…)

Page 7: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Redirecting a complainant

• Reasons to redirect:

-closer to complaint & complainant

-local expertise

-opportunity to improve care

Page 8: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Not redirecting a complainant

• Reasons for not redirecting:

-vulnerability

-from pillar to post

-closer & easier follow-up

Page 9: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Redirecting to whom?

• Care provider

• Ombudsman

• Complaints commission

Page 10: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Judging a complaint

• Founded-unfounded

• Possible consequences?

Page 11: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

How complaints are investigated (I)

• Ask additional written information

• Write or call care provider

• Ask for written follow-up of complaint by care provider

Page 12: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

How complaints are investigated (II)

• Visit care provider

• Talk to complainant

• Include complaint in next regular inspection

• Hold formal meeting with care provider

Page 13: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Revealing identity? (I)

• “Retaliation”, whistle blowing

• Care provider’s ability to resolve problem

• How anonymous is anonymous?

Page 14: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Revealing identity? (II)

• No identity, no investigation

• Options for complainant

• Options for Inspectorate

Page 15: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Complainant unknown to Inspectorate

• Investigation in spite of anonymous nature

• Anonymity →no investigation

Page 16: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Follow-up

• Follow-up of an investigated complaint:

-written follow-up by care provider-include follow-up in regular inspection later on-specific follow-up inspection-contacting complainant

Page 17: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Reporting on an individual complaint

• Written reports in all countries• Sent to care provider• Sent to complainant• Published on website (…)

Page 18: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Registration

• In general and systematic way: most countries

• Fragmented: 1 country

Page 19: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

General report

• Miscellaneous

• Only 50% of countries report on regular basis and in general on complaints investigation

Page 20: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Make use of complaints

• Include information from complaints in future inspection programs or instruments

• Not everyone’s logic

Page 21: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Training Inspectors

• Specific training for dealing with complaints

• Only 50% of epso members train inspectors for dealing with complaints

• →Epso training?

Page 22: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

Questions for reflection

Page 23: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

1. Supervisor’s involvement in complaints procedure

• First level

• Second level (appeal instance)

• Not involved

Page 24: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

2. Redirecting complaints

• A. From supervisor to care provider

• B. Care provider mentioning supervisor as appeal instance

Page 25: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

3. Informing the public

• Most effective methods of informing public?

Page 26: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

4.How to investigate complaints

• Visit the care provider?

• Study documents?

Page 27: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

5. Anonymous complaints

• Anonymous complaints to be handled?

Page 28: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

6. How to follow-up complaints

• Which way of follow-up is preferred?

Page 29: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

7. Written reports

• Not sent to complainant (Flanders)?

• Not sent to care provider (Slovenia)?

Page 30: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

8. General reports

• No general reports in Sweden, Finland, Slovenia, Flanders?

Page 31: epso complaints

epso complaints 5 2 2010

9. Training inspectors

* Specific complaints training in Northern Ireland, Norway, Flanders (…)Lithuania

* Set up training together?