epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview david w. warnock centers for disease...

36
Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Upload: avery-cross

Post on 28-Mar-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview

David W. Warnock

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta, Georgia

Page 2: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Public HealthHealthcare

Focus on:- individual- diagnosis- treatment

Focus on:- population- prevention

Page 3: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

The cycle of disease prevention

Identify risk factors fordisease and potentialprevention measures

Measure the effectivenessof prevention strategies

for the disease

Conduct surveillance todetermine burden of adisease in a population

Page 4: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

The cycle of disease prevention

Identify risk factors fordisease and potentialprevention measures

Measure the effectivenessof prevention strategies

for the disease

Conduct surveillance todetermine burden of adisease in a population

Page 5: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

The cycle of disease prevention

Identify risk factors fordisease and potentialprevention measures

Measure the effectivenessof prevention strategies

for the disease

Conduct surveillance todetermine burden of adisease in a population

Page 6: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

The cycle of disease prevention

Identify risk factors fordisease and potentialprevention measures

Measure the effectivenessof prevention strategies

for the disease

Conduct surveillance todetermine burden of adisease in a population

Page 7: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Public health surveillance

● ‘The ongoing systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of information about a disease’[1]

● ‘The reason for collecting, analyzing and disseminating information on a disease is to control that disease’ [2]

● ‘Collection and analysis should not be allowed to consume resources if action does not follow’ [2]

[1] Langmuir N Engl J Med 1963;268:182-92[2] Foege Int J Epidemiol 1976;5:29-37

Page 8: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

The spectrum of public health surveillance

Sentinel surveillance

Population-based

surveillance

Population

Passive surveillance

Active surveillance

Syndromic surveillance

Laboratory-based

surveillance

Case definitionData collection

Page 9: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Comparison of surveillance systems

● Active surveillance– Investigator-initiated– Dedicated staff needed– Extensive case finding

performed– Extensive clinical and

laboratory information– Audits performed– High cost

● Passive surveillance– Provider-initiated– No dedicated staff needed– Limited case finding

performed– Limited clinical and

laboratory information– No audits performed– Lower cost

Page 10: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Number of reported cases of coccidioidomycosis United States, 2007

2991

4832

72

23

0

68

324

3

277

Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2007; 56 (no 53) (published July 9, 2009)

12

9

3

Page 11: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Mycotic diseases: passive surveillance

● Healthcare providers feel no need to report fungal infections since no immediate public health action is required

● Limitations of current diagnostic tests hinder the development of case definitions

● As a result these infections are under-diagnosed and under-reported

In 2007, CSTE adopted a modified case definition for coccidioidomycosis: a single positive serologic test for IgG is

now adequate for definition of a case

Page 12: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Mycotic diseases surveillance: case definitions

● A standardized case definition is needed to perform reliable surveillance for a disease

● In some diseases, a positive culture is indicative of colonization rather than infection

● Consensus case definitions for clinical trial enrollment of immunocompromised patients are too complicated for surveillance and not generalizable to other patient groups

Page 13: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Population-based surveillance

● Provides the most representative information on a disease in the entire population of a defined geographic location, and specific groups within that population

● All cases of the disease in the catchment area are identified, but only cases among residents are counted

● Incidence is calculated as the number of new cases occurring in a defined time period divided by the total population

● Active population-based surveillance to determine trends in disease incidence is expensive to conduct, and difficult to sustain for long periods

Page 14: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Incidence of Candida bloodstream infections(per 100,000 population)

Diekema et al. 2002; Hajjeh et al. 2004; Kao et al. 1999

6.01998-2001

7.11992-1993

8.71992-1993

7.11998-2000

24.01998-2000

14.02008-2009

25.02008-2009

Page 15: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Incidence of Cryptococcus gattii infection British Columbia, Canada

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Vancouver Island Mainland

Source: BC Centre for Disease Control 2007

Cas

es p

er 1

00,0

00 p

opul

a tio

n

Average incidence 1999–2006:Vancouver Island: 2.8 cases per 100,000 Mainland: 0.65 cases per 100,000

Page 16: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Estimated population-based incidenceof Candida bloodstream, by race

Kao et al. 1999; Hajjeh et al. 2004

Cas

es p

er 1

00,0

00 p

opul

atio

nAtlanta, GA, and San Francisco, CA

1992-1993

Connecticut, and Baltimore, MD

1998-2000

Page 17: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Population-based surveillanceCohort studies

● In cohort studies, the population is defined as a particular group of individuals (e.g. persons with AIDS or transplant recipients)

● Adequate follow-up is essential to determine the presence or absence of infection and therefore inclusion as a case of disease or non-case

● These studies are most useful when only a subset of the population is at risk for a particular disease

● Information is more broadly representative than reports from single centers

Page 18: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Incidence of invasive fungal infections after stem cell transplant, 2001-2006 (TransNet)

12-m

on

th c

um

ula

tiv

e in

cid

enc

e (%

)

Kontoyiannis et al. 2009 submitted for publication

Page 19: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Incidence of invasive aspergillosis after allogeneic stem cell transplant, 2001-2005

(TransNet)

12-

mo

nth

cu

mu

lativ

e in

cid

enc

e (

%)

Transplant center

Overall incidence: 1.6%

Page 20: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Sentinel surveillance

● Conducted at selected medical centers or sites, rather than in the entire population of a geographic location

● Total burden of disease in the general population cannot be estimated, but useful for diseases where the at-risk population is captured

● Less expensive and easier to perform than population-based surveillance

Page 21: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Sentinel surveillance

● Hospital are good sites for sentinel surveillance of invasive fungal infections because good denominators are available

● Useful for monitoring trends in incidence of particular pathogens and infections, species distribution, and antifungal drug resistance

● Site selection can be biased, so information may not be representative of the general hospital population

Page 22: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Incidence of Candida bloodstream infections (per 10,000 hospital admissions)

Canada4.0

United States8.0

Brazil24.9

Australia2.1

Spain5.3

Sweden3.2

France2.0

Italy3.8

Almirante et al. 2005; Colombo et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2006; Hajjeh et al. 2004; Laupland et al. 2005; Tortorano et al. 2004;

Page 23: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Administrative data as sources of information

● Hospital discharge and death records, based on ICD codes, are widely available, and permit application of common definitions to similar data from different institutions,

● Use of these data minimizes ascertainment bias when investigators use diverse methods for case finding

● Helpful for investigating long-term trends in disease incidence rates

● Limitations include diagnostic errors, inconsistent disease coding, and undetected duplicate reporting of cases

Page 24: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Comparison of the use of administrative data with an active system for surveillance of invasive

aspergillosis in a single hospital, 2001-2005

● 64 of 1736 transplant recipients had ICD-9 codes consistent with IA, triggering medical record review; 3 cases detected by other methods

● 48 of 67 patients reviewed had other or no infections, or had insufficient evidence to be classed as proven or probable IA

● 14 of 19 patients reviewed and classed as having IA identified by both methods; 3 identified by active surveillance only; 2 identified by ICD-9 code only

Chang et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiology 2008; 29: 25-30

Page 25: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Incidence of zygomycosis in France based on analysis of hospital records,1997-2006

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Bitar et al. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15: 1395-1401

Cas

es p

er 1

00,0

00 p

opul

a tio

n

Page 26: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Disease registries as sources of information

● Provide useful information about clinical details of rare fungal infections, or infections occurring in special hosts, such as transplant recipients

● Limited value for public health surveillance because meaningful and appropriate denominator data are not available

● Subject to ascertainment bias: variable participation or case finding leads to unrepresentative results

● Should not be interpreted as being representative of broader populations

Page 27: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

● Established in 1996 as a collaboration among CDC, USDA, FDA, and state health departments

● Conducts population-based, active surveillance for laboratory-confirmed infections caused by 9 pathogens commonly transmitted through food– Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella

spp., Shigella spp., STEC O157, Vibrio spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Cryptosporidium spp., Cyclospora spp.

FoodNet Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network

2009 : 10 sites, 45 million persons, 15% of population

Page 28: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Inci

denc

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion

National objective

1.30

0.90

Healthy People 2010 Objective: 1.0 illness per 100,000 persons

FoodNet trends: E. coli O157 infections

Page 29: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Estimating the burden of disease

● Most surveillance systems do not capture the total burden of disease in a population

● This is because the reporting of a case depends on a number of steps: the patient must visit a doctor; the doctor must collect a sample; the sample must be tested; the pathogen must be identified; and the test result must be notified

● The proportion of cases that are detected and reported differs from disease to disease

Page 30: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Food-related illness and death in the United States

‘Foodborne diseases cause 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5000 deaths in the United States each year’

Mead et al. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:607-25

This article had been cited on 2350 occasions through 9.21.09

Page 31: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Estimating the global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcosis

● Literature search for studies reporting estimates of incidence among HIV populations since 1996

● Median incidence for each UNAIDS geographic region multiplied by the HIV population to estimate number of cases

● To estimate number of deaths, assumed a 3-month case fatality rate

– 9% in high-income regions– 55% in low- and middle-income regions– 70% in Sub-Saharan Africa

Park et al. AIDS 2009; 23: 525-30

Page 32: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Western & Central Europe

500

North Africa & Middle East

6,500

Sub-Saharan Africa

720,000

Eastern Europe & Central Asia

27,200

South & South-East Asia

120,000

Oceania100

North America7,800

Caribbean7,800

Latin America54,400

East Asia13,600

Global total: 957,900 cases (range: 371,700 – 1,544,000)

Estimated annual cases of HIV-associated cryptococcosis

Park et al. AIDS 2009; 23: 525-30

Page 33: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

Western & Central Europe

45

North Africa & Middle East

3,600

Sub-Saharan Africa

504,000

Eastern Europe & Central Asia

15,000

South & South-East Asia

66,000

Oceania10

North America700

Caribbean4,300

Latin America29,900

East Asia1,200

Global total: 624,700 deaths (range: 125,000 – 1,124,900)

Estimated annual deaths from HIV-associated cryptococcosis

Park et al. AIDS 2009; 23: 525-30

Page 34: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

Mala

ria

Diarrh

eal d

iseas

es

Childh

ood-

cluste

r dise

ases

Crypt

ococ

cosis

Tuber

culos

is

STDs exc

luding

HIV

Tropic

al-c

luste

r dise

ases

Hepat

itis B

Non-C

rypt

o M

enin

gitis

Hepat

itis C

Estimated deaths in Sub-Saharan Africa from cryptococcosis and other infectious diseases*

WHO estimates

* Excluding HIV AIDS

Page 35: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

In conclusion:

● Similar burden of disease estimates need to be developed for other fungal infections

● These estimates would allow for comparison with other diseases

● These estimates would help set public health and healthcare priorities, and determine resource allocations

Page 36: Epidemiology and surveillance of fungal infections: an overview David W. Warnock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of

the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Thank you for your attention