environmentally friendly cars: promoting and increasing their use in the uk

36
Earth & E-nvironment 3: 282-317 University of Leeds Press Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK Richard S. Ward-Jones School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, W. Yorkshire LS2 9JT; Tel: 0113 3436461 Abstract This paper reports on environmentally friendly cars and how their use can be promoted and increased in the UK. It is based on a review of the academic literature on alternative fuel vehicles (AFV’s) and their current use and promotion schemes, as well as a public survey and interviews with experts in order to gather an overview of what may influence or encourage the public to purchase an EFV. Having acknowledged transport emissions as both the fastest rising cause of greenhouse gases (GHG’s) in the UK and accounting for around 25% of all UK carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, there is clearly an urgent need to reduce them. Herein lies the role of the environmentally friendly vehicle (EFV). The study identifies the different available alternative vehicle technologies, their advantages and disadvantages and goes on to establish that the current lack of environmentally friendly cars can be attributed to a number of factors, predominantly a lack of public awareness and the additional costs involved with alternative technologies. Current promotion schemes are examined and shown to be relatively ineffective in increasing the use of EFV’s. Following the combined analysis of past literature and study results, recommendations were made on how to promote and increase the use of EFV’s. The indicated strategy stated that a campaign to promote knowledge and awareness of EFV’s would be necessary in conjunction with fiscal incentives and development of the alternative fuel/vehicle infrastructure. In conclusion it seems that EFV’s can and must have an instrumental role in reducing GHG emissions from transport. A strategy to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars is an essential step towards achieving zero emissions from road transport; however it can not be expected to have an immediate effect. Instead it is likely that it will take until 2050 for EFV’s to occupy a significant proportion of the market. . ISSN 1744-2893 (Online) © University of Leeds

Upload: zy8

Post on 19-Jan-2015

1.023 views

Category:

Design


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Earth & E-nvironment 3: 282-317 University of Leeds Press

Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Richard S. Ward-Jones

School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, W. Yorkshire LS2 9JT; Tel: 0113 3436461

Abstract This paper reports on environmentally friendly cars and how their use can be promoted and increased in the UK. It is based on a review of the academic literature on alternative fuel vehicles (AFV’s) and their current use and promotion schemes, as well as a public survey and interviews with experts in order to gather an overview of what may influence or encourage the public to purchase an EFV. Having acknowledged transport emissions as both the fastest rising cause of greenhouse gases (GHG’s) in the UK and accounting for around 25% of all UK carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, there is clearly an urgent need to reduce them. Herein lies the role of the environmentally friendly vehicle (EFV). The study identifies the different available alternative vehicle technologies, their advantages and disadvantages and goes on to establish that the current lack of environmentally friendly cars can be attributed to a number of factors, predominantly a lack of public awareness and the additional costs involved with alternative technologies. Current promotion schemes are examined and shown to be relatively ineffective in increasing the use of EFV’s. Following the combined analysis of past literature and study results, recommendations were made on how to promote and increase the use of EFV’s. The indicated strategy stated that a campaign to promote knowledge and awareness of EFV’s would be necessary in conjunction with fiscal incentives and development of the alternative fuel/vehicle infrastructure. In conclusion it seems that EFV’s can and must have an instrumental role in reducing GHG emissions from transport. A strategy to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars is an essential step towards achieving zero emissions from road transport; however it can not be expected to have an immediate effect. Instead it is likely that it will take until 2050 for EFV’s to occupy a significant proportion of the market.

. ISSN 1744-2893 (Online) © University of Leeds

Page 2: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 283 -

1 Introduction Global warming is a reality which was acknowledged by governments at the Rio summit in 1992 and at Kyoto in 1997 (Cannell, 1999). Not only was it acknowledged but it is also generally accepted that the global climate is changing as a result of anthropogenic activities (IPCCa, 2001). Caused by the release of greenhouse gases, climate change (CC) is one of the biggest challenges facing the global community today (LCVPa 2005, Orindi & Murray 2005). In looking at the causes of climate change, transport is one of the key factors amplifying the current situation (Kwon, 2005). Transport emissions are the fastest rising cause of greenhouse gases (GHG’s) and account for around 25% of all UK carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (Brevitt 2002, Foley 2003, SMMTa 2006 & Price et al. 1998). Between 1970 and 2000 in the UK, emissions from road transport increased by 93% (Kwon, 2005). This increase is expected to continue into the foreseeable future, with emissions from transport expected to be higher in 2020 than they were in 1990 (Tight et al, 2005). Figure 1.1 shows that of all the polluting sectors, transport is the only one with predicted emissions due to increase during this period as well as showing that transport will become the UK’s leading GHG emissions sector soon after 2020. Both of these highlight the seriousness of the issue of transport’s contribution to climate change.

Figure 1.1 – A Table showing UK GHG emissions by sector (MtC) (Source Tight et al. 2005)

The problem of reducing emissions from transport is very difficult. This is due to modern society’s ever increasing reliance on and use of transport. In 2002, car sales reached a record 2.5 million, 11% higher than in 2000 (SMMTb, 2006) and they continue to increase albeit at a reduced rate in recent years. Major policies have been introduced during the last decade in order to reduce emissions from transport but their success has been limited. They include European Policy: the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) – a voluntary agreement which requires car manufacturers to improve the fuel efficiency of new cars by at least 25% by 2008-2009; and National Policy: A new deal for transport, better for everyone - 1998 White Paper (DFTa, 1998), The Transport Ten Year Plan 2000 (DFTb, 2000) and The Future of Transport White Paper (DFTc, 2004). Within these national policies there is much talk about an integrated approach to transport, better public transport and increased environmental standards of vehicles and infrastructure. Although these policies have caused significant improvements in vehicle technology, particularly in fuel efficiency (as reduced CO2 emissions), these have not been enough to neutralise the effect of increases in traffic and car size (EUROPA, 2007). The intentions of these policies are unquestionably good, but results are not being seen fast enough, especially not to meet any of the current targets.

Page 3: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 284 -

Figure 1.2 – Graph showing reduction in emissions per vehicle 1995 – 2008 (Source: DFTc (Crown copyright) 2004)

As shown by Figure 1.2, emission reduction policies are not on target. CO2 emissions per vehicle in 2004 were 12.4% lower than in 1990, way off target for being 25% lower by 2008 (Times 2006 & DFTc 2004). There are many reasons that these targets are not being met, firstly punishments for not meeting the targets set by these policies are either not strict enough or the policies themselves are voluntary and car manufacturers are taking advantage of this. As well as this, there is a lack of campaigning to encourage public interest in sustainable transport and too few practical alternatives to the petrol car currently exist. So, the question of how we can significantly reduce emissions from transport is becoming increasingly important. As more people are becoming more concerned about emissions from transport, augmented pressure is being put on both car manufacturers and the government to consider a different approach. This different approach is to look at the role of environmentally friendly cars in combating climate change. Low carbon car technologies and fuels present car manufacturers, fuel suppliers and the Government with one of the principal means of reducing the CO2 emissions from road transport (Foley, 2003). However, the current situation is hugely complex, with many factors affecting the development and marketing of low carbon car technologies. These complexities have meant that the sales of alternatively fueled vehicles have remained extremely low, accounting for only 0.26% of new car sales in 2005 (SMMTa, 2006). Still, the news is not all bad. Figure 1.3 shows that the sales of alternatively fueled vehicles have increased sevenfold between 2000 and 2005 and although they are still low, it seems that they are starting to increase.

Figure 1.3 – A graph to show the sales of alternatively fuelled vehicles (Source SMMTa, 2006)

Page 4: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 285 -

The government has recently introduced a new target requiring one in ten new cars sold in the UK to be low carbon with exhaust emissions of 100 g/km of CO2 or less by 2012 (Foley, 2003). In order to meet this target, the market for ‘green cars’ must be promoted to increase their sales. The technology for environmentally friendly cars exists, but there is not enough demand to develop this technology or to produce a substantial number of ‘green cars’. There is also a lack of research into how it would be possible to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars. This gap in the research, once filled, could help to identify strategies for promoting ‘green cars’, therefore increasing their use. 1.1 Research Questions The market for environmentally friendly cars has not followed predicted growth trends. The ‘green car’ market accounts for a tiny minority of cars sold and its promotion/development could help to significantly decrease CO2 emissions from transport, which are currently the fastest rising cause of global warming in the UK (Brevitt, 2002). Questions which arise from this statement include:

1. What are the reasons behind the lack of environmentally friendly cars being sold? (Design? Performance? Comfort? Cost? Reliability? Lack of marketing/advertising? Lack of knowledge? Symbolism?)

2. What more can be done in order to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars?

3. What do the public feel would influence them to buy an environmentally friendly car? 4. When is it likely that ‘green cars’ will occupy a more substantial part of the motor vehicle

market?

1.2 Aims & Objectives The main aim of this project is to look at the reasons behind the current lack of environmentally friendly cars on the road and how it would be possible to increase and promote their use. In order to achieve this, it will be necessary to:

• Review the literature on environmentally friendly cars in order to determine reasons why their market has not developed

• Investigate public and professional opinion through surveys and interviews on why ‘green cars’ have not become mainstream and what can be done to promote their use

• Analyse the results from the interviews and surveys, highlighting any common trends

• Evaluate primary and secondary data in order to recommend possible strategies which may positively influence the promotion of the ‘green car’ market

• Provide a clear and concise conclusion which identifies the projects’ main findings. 2 Literature Review 2.1 The Transport Situation today Carbon emissions from fossil fuel use in the transport sector are rising faster than those from any other sector (Price et al., 1998). In the UK, transport currently accounts for 25% of CO2 emissions (Foley, 2003) and these are expected to increase to 30% by 2015 (Williamson et al. 1997). This increase is due to an ongoing rapid rise in car ownership, which outweighs developments in engine technology and cleaner fuels (Richards 2001 & Nieuwenhuis & Wells 2003). The dominant vehicle propulsion system in the world today is the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) (Pischinger 2004 & Mizsey et al. 2001). It has taken over our cities, clogging and polluting them to an unacceptable level (Nieuwenhuis et al, 2006). Developments in engine

Page 5: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 286 -

technology and clean fuels have significantly reduced emissions of pollutants from cars powered by the ICE but it is still far from being sustainable in terms of its well-to-wheel efficiency or CO2 emissions. So, why does the number of cars built with ICE’s continue to rise? The answer: it requires the lowest investment cost. Past studies have shown that in order for individuals to switch to more sustainable modes of transport a cost incentive must be provided (Garling et al, 2007). Consequently, whilst the cost incentive remains with the ICE, car manufacturers/people will continue to produce/buy them. Currently, more sustainable alternatives cost more to produce and often to run. In light of this their demand has not been sufficient to entail mass-production. Dependant though both the car manufacturing industry and society are upon the ICE, it must go. However, in order to replace it a viable alternative must be sought and herein lies the role of environmentally friendly vehicles (EFV’s). 2.2 Looking Forwards 2.2.1 Sustainable Transport Since the notorious Brundtland report stated that ‘a sustainable condition for this planet is one in which there is a stability for both social and physical systems, achieved through meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (WCED, 1987, p 43), transport questions are increasingly being put in the context of sustainable development (Nijkamp 1994 & Booth et al. 2001). In turn, there has been increased pressure on motor vehicle manufacturers to design progressively cleaner cars and ultimately to reach zero emissions (Peake, 1997). Technology and, more specifically, improvements in the rate and direction of technological change, will play a very important role. Some new low-carbon emission technologies are not adopted because their cost and performance characteristics make them unattractive relative to existing technologies. To be adopted, these technologies require tax advantages, cost subsidies, or additional cost-reducing or performance-enhancing research and development Technology will play a very important role in switching to clean low carbon transport as it requires no major change in how activities need be carried out (Banister 2005, Turton 2006 & IPCCb 2001). Aside from being attractive to the general public it is also politically attractive as it helps diversify fuel sources and reduces dependence on imported oil (Banister, 2005). In terms of the available technology, sustainable transport can be looked at in three stages; short, medium and long term. In the short term, the use of light-duty vehicles (LDV’s) with improved energy efficiency provides the most cost effective and therefore sustainable means of reducing oil consumption (IEAa, 2001). Simply by using the best available current petrol and diesel technologies average fuel consumption could be decreased by 25-30% (Banister, 2005). Medium term sustainable transport will involve a shift from petrol and diesel vehicles to Hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles running on Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), Natural Gas and Biofuels. Hybrid gasoline-electric vehicles can reduce petrol consumption by 30-50% and therefore GHG emissions with no change in vehicle class (Romm, 2006). The transition towards these alternatives is already beginning, with over 100,000 vehicles running on LPG and the introduction of hybrid vehicles such as the Toyota Prius to the UK market. Finally, in the long term, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles offer a mode of transport which could be entirely sustainable but which is not presently commercially possible. 2.2.2 The Role of the environmentally friendly car The current role of environmentally friendly cars is a small one, but increasing public and professional awareness of issues such as air and noise pollution and the overarching problem of climate change will, and already are changing this. The potential for EFV’s is huge, with the ultimate goal to achieve zero emissions. It is important to recognise the numerous different kinds of EFV; each is unique and offers slightly different social, environmental and economic benefits to any other.

Page 6: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 287 -

2.3 Environmentally Friendly Fuels and Technologies 2.3.1 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Worldwide, LPG vehicles are the most widely produced alternative fuel vehicles (OECD, 2004). LPG is a by-product of oil refining but it also occurs naturally from gas production. In the UK each year, four million tonnes surplus of LPG is produced from refining in the North Sea (Price et al. 2004). It has been used as a motor fuel for over 60 years though much of this use has been in agricultural vehicles and fork-lift trucks (ETSU, 1996). In the UK, LPG vehicle numbers increased between 1997 and 2003 but have since stabilised in conjunction with the increasing availability of hybrid cars (SMMTa, 2006). There are over 120,000 LPG cars on the road in the UK, with approximately 1300 LPG filling stations (Total 2007 & BoostLPG 2007). LPG gives comparable performance to petrol engine vehicles on levels of pollutant emissions, and offers reduced CO2 emissions of 10-15%. In comparison to diesel engine vehicles LPG technologies offer very good results, but produce similar or slightly augmented levels of CO2 emissions (OECD 2004 & Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). Most LPG cars are ‘bi-fuel’, carrying both petrol and LPG, enabling them to switch from one fuel to the other. (Foley, 2003). To make the conversion to LPG costs around £1500 and these converted vehicles account for virtually all of the LPG vehicles in Britain. The cost of running an LPG vehicle is calculated to be between 30 and 40% less than running a standard petrol engine vehicle. 2.3.2 Natural Gas Natural gas is a mixture of hydrocarbons (mainly methane) and is produced as a by-product of oil production and from gas wells (DoE, 2005). The interest in natural gas as an alternative fuel stems mainly from its clean burning qualities, its domestic resource base, and its commercial availability to end users (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). In the UK in 2004, there were only 543 vehicles on the road which used natural gas (IANGV, 2007). There are two forms of natural gas-powered vehicles (NGV’s), compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Another use of natural gas is to blend it with hydrogen for use in fuel cell vehicles (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). 2.3.3 Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) CNG has been used in vehicles since the 1930’s (Aslam et al. 2006). It burns more completely than petrol and therefore offers significant air quality benefits, particularly in terms of reductions of particulate matter (PM10), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), benzene and carbon monoxide (CO) in comparison to diesel, petrol or LPG engines (Brevitt, 2002). Carbon dioxide emissions are reduced by approximately 20% but a negative aspect is increased methane emissions. Similar to LPG vehicles, CNG vehicles are commonly ‘bi-fuel’ vehicles, though dedicated CNG vehicles do exist. The bi-fuel conversion process costs around £3000 (Brevitt, 2002). CNG is stored in tanks which are considerably larger and heavier than conventional petrol tanks, thus reducing the range, passenger space and performance of the vehicle (ETSU, 1996). Refueling options range from cheap, slow fill options which work overnight, to more expensive systems with similar refuel times to petrol but there are very few of these in the UK (around 20 in 2001 (Brevitt, 2002)). Currently CNG vehicles are most practical for fleets (i.e. taxi’s, buses, and delivery vehicles) which are centrally maintained and fueled and can install their own dedicated refueling station. In order for their success as private level vehicles, the refueling infrastructure for CNG vehicles must be improved and an effective gas storage system which gives acceptable vehicle range must be developed. 2.3.4 Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) LNG records very similar emissions to CNG and differs more in terms of the on-board fuel system and the fuelling infrastructure (ENGVA, 2006). It has a much higher energy density than CNG, about two thirds that of petrol, which gives greatly improved vehicle ranges. On the downside, the tanks are even heavier and more expensive than those used to store CNG (ETSU 1996 & ENGVA 2006). In light of the on-board system weight, LNG systems are most

Page 7: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 288 -

commonly used in heavy goods vehicles (HGV’s). The fuelling facility cost of LNG is higher than conventional fuels in terms of equipment costs and in order for it to be economically viable, high throughput volumes are required (ENGVA, 2006). For these reasons, the ideal use for LNG is as the fuel of large fleets which refuel at a central station. 2.3.5 Biofuels Biofuels have been recognised as a major world renewable energy source (Demirbas 2007, Ozcimen et al. 2004 & Jefferson et al. 2006). They offer total carbon savings because fuels are made from waste or plant material which absorb CO2 during growth thereby making the fuel emissions carbon neutral (SMMTa 2006 & Brevitt 2002). Once the feedstock, waste and plant material is collected it is converted into useful energy but this process is not cheap, costing 3 times more than petroleum fuels (DTIb 2003 & IEAc 2004). As well as the cost, producing biofuels from grain feedstock requires a huge amount of land. In fact, to meet all of France’s transport needs with biofuels over 25% of France’s land area would be required (OECD, 2004). As a consequence of the high costs and large land areas involved in the collection and manufacturing of biofuels, the number of vehicles running on them is low. In the UK in 2005 just 0.3 per cent of fuels sold in the UK were biofuels (SMMTa, 2006). The number of biofuel vehicles is increasing though, especially in the U.S and Brazil (Demirbas, 2007). Future technologies are likely to produce cost improvements but it remains unlikely that biofuels will ever provide enough fuel to meet transport demands, however they could contribute (IEAb, 2003). There are three main biofuels: bioethanol, biomethanol and biodiesel. 2.3.6 Bioethanol Bio-ethanol is a simple alcohol that can be used as a fuel or blended with petrol to power vehicles (Saab 2006 & Brevitt 2002). It is derived from renewable sources of feedstock; typically plants such as wheat, sugar beet, corn, straw, and wood but it is also to produce bioethanol from converted household waste (Demirbas, 2007). The most efficient production of bioethanol is from sugarcane in the tropics where no external energy supply is required for its conversion to a fuel (Saab 2006). Brazil in particular produces much bioethanol, shown here by Figure 2.1.

Figure 2.1 – World and Regional Fuel Ethanol Production (million litres p/a), 1975-2003 (Source: IEAc,

2004).

As with all biofuels it is very expensive to produce, which has led to its predominant use as a blend with petrol. This blend can range from 5% bioethanol to 15% without engine modification and then up to 85% (E85) with modification (Demirbas, 2007).

Page 8: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 289 -

2.3.7 Bio-methanol Methanol was widely used in the early part of the century before inexpensive petrol was introduced (Demirbas, 2007). It is predominantly produced from natural gas but can be produced from biomass, hence producing biomethanol (Maclean et al. 2003). Numerous disadvantages of methanol; including its corrosiveness, lower vapor pressure (making cold starts difficult), water contamination and toxicity to ecosystems; have led to its predominant use as a blend with petrol (Maclean et al. 2003 & OECD 2004). Methanol could play a part in meeting future transport demands as a fuel with advances in technology and a shift to producing methanol from biomass rather than from natural gas. 2.3.8 Biodiesel Biodiesel is a renewable diesel fuel substitute produced from vegetable oils or animal fats (in North America biodiesel is most commonly produced from soybean oil and in Europe, from rapeseed oil) (Maclean 2003 & Demirbas 2007). Biodiesel can be used as a pure fuel in modified engines or mixed with petroleum-diesel and used in current engines without modification. It produces fewer PM10, CO and sulphur dioxide (SO4) emissions than a petroleum diesel engine as well as reducing CO2 emissions by more than 75%. Using a blend of 20% reduces CO2 emissions by 15% (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). On the other hand, biodiesel costs about 1.5 - 2 times more than diesel, increasing the costs of biodiesel blends to above the price of standard diesel (Demirbas 2007 & Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). Thus, it is currently not economically viable and is used on a very small scale. Figure 2.2 shows that in the UK, levels of oilseed production to produce biodiesel have remained low between 1984 and 2001 because of the economic disincentives involved with its production.

Figure 2.2 – UK Harvested Production of Oilseed 1984-2001 (Source: Brevitt, 2002).

More research and technological development will be needed in order for biodiesel to occupy a more substantial part of the UK fuel market (Demirbas 2007 & Bender 1999).

2.3.9 Electric Vehicles (EV’s) Electric vehicles, otherwise known as battery powered vehicles (BPV’s), are powered by rechargeable batteries, producing no local emissions and running very quietly during operation (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004, ETSU 1996, Romm 2006 & Tzeng et al 2005). There is a range of battery technologies currently including lead-acid, nickel-metal and lithium polymer batteries. Each can be recharged off of the national grid at home or in the future at recharging stations (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004, Brevitt 2002 & Maclean et al. 2003). Depending on the source of energy used to charge the batteries EV’s have ranging total emissions, from low-zero (when the source of energy for

Page 9: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 290 -

charging is from renewable or nuclear sources) to slightly higher (when the source of energy for charging is from coal or non-renewable sources). Nonetheless, a study by Tsioliaridou et al. (2004) calculated that even when coal source emissions are included, overall EV’s remain 90% cleaner than the cleanest conventional vehicle. Among the other advantages of EV’s are lower fuel and maintenance costs. On the other hand EV’s do have disadvantages. Batteries are expensive, take prolonged periods of time to charge (about 6-7 hours) and must be replaced every four to six years (Dubois 1999, Tsioliaridou et al. 2004, OECD 2004 & Maclean et al. 2003). Their driving range is significantly lower than that of a petrol/diesel car, averaging between 60 and 120 miles (Sperling 1995, Nieuwenhuis et al, 2006 & Tsioliaridou et al. 2004) which although suitable for urban travel and commuting, is not suitable for longer distances. The top speed of a BPV is also lower than for an equivalent petrol/diesel (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). There is a lack of current infrastructure for charging batteries (OECD, 2004). Having researched the positive and negative aspects of EV’s, one of the common recommendations in order for them to be able to compete in the market is to improve the performance of the batteries to give better top speeds and vehicle ranges. Research is underway but the mainstream application of full electric vehicles does not appear too likely in the near future. However, new concepts are being developed of which the most promising is the hybrid-electric vehicle (OECD, 2004). 2.3.10 Hybrid-Electric Vehicles (HEV’s) Hybrid-electric vehicles have overcome the limitations of dedicated electric vehicles by combining an electric battery with the power and performance of a conventional engine (Frank 2007, Foley 2003 & Brevitt 2002). They have proven extremely popular and since their breakthrough into the UK market in 2001, they now account for over 90% of all AFV’s sold (See Figure 1.3, SMMTa 2006). The most notable of the HEV’s is the Toyota Prius, which currently occupies 64% of the U.S. hybrid market and 65% of the UK’s (SMMTb 2006 CBS News 2005 & Lipman et al. 2006). HEV’s run on their batteries in stop-start traffic and on their engines when travelling at higher speeds but for many, the most ingenious property of the hybrid system is that the engine charges the electric battery so HEV’s do not require electric refuelling (Foley, 2003). In terms of their environmental benefits, CO2 emissions are reduced by 30% as well as reductions in other air pollutants (Foley 2003, OECD 2004 & Romm 2006). One of the disadvantages to HEV’s is the production costs, which are typically slightly higher than for standard vehicles (OECD 2004 & Brevitt 2002). Nevertheless, the manufacturing costs are slowly falling as new technologies are introduced. 2.3.11 Fuel Cell Vehicles (Hydrogen) Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCV’s) are considered by many to be the most promising alternative technology for personal transportation vehicles in the future (Schwoon 2006, Romm 2006, Pischinger et al. 2006, Maclean et al. 2003). Essentially, a fuel cell is a catalytic device which converts the energy stored in fuel (e.g. hydrogen) directly into electrical energy to turn an electric motor. Unlike a battery, where the supply of chemicals is limited by its size, fuel cells can be continuously fed with fuel to produce electricity indefinitely (Brevitt 2002 & Maclean et al. 2003). The current fundamental fuel required in order for FCV’s to produce zero-emissions and high efficiency is hydrogen. Technically it is possible to produce hydrogen from petrol or diesel if the fuel cell is equipped with a reformer but this results in CO2 emissions similar to those of future advanced diesel vehicles (Tsioliaridou et al. 2004). However, in the future the use of other fuels may be possible (OECD, 2004). Whilst hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCV’s) are zero emission, this does not account for any emissions created during the process of producing the hydrogen in the first place (Foley, 2003). Ideally, the hydrogen is produced by renewable means; however this is not the case in the world today, rather something to aim for in the future.

Page 10: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 291 -

Literature reveals that FCV’s require considerable research and development to refine the technology and that numerous problems must be overcome in order for their commercialisation. Some of these problems include: the cost of fuel cell production, the supply of the pure hydrogen fuel that is required, and the difficulties involved in creating a hydrogen fuelling infrastructure. A combination of these problems means that FCV’s are unlikely to achieve significant (>5%) market penetration by 2030 (Romm 2006). 2.4 The current take up of AFV’s in the UK The sales of AFV’s in the UK have remained extremely low, accounting for only 0.26% of new car sales in 2005 (SMMTa, 2006). The statistics are not all bad though. Since 2000, when less then 500 AFV’s were sold in the UK, a 14 fold increase to nearly 7000 vehicles sold in 2005 has occurred (Shown in Figure 1.3). The introduction of the HEV to the UK market has boosted their sales massively – it is now possible to buy an AFV which looks and drives the same as a standard vehicle, but which is cheaper and cleaner to run. The Toyota Prius leads this market though other car manufacturers (Honda and Lexus) are starting to introduce their own HEV’s. Environmentally friendly vehicles have gained relatively widespread consumer acceptance in the UK during recent years (Turton, 2006) and though it is difficult to pinpoint the reasons for this, it would appear that increased public and professional awareness of issues such as global warming and air traffic pollution have had a drastic effect on the take-up of EFV’s. The added support of government initiatives such as grants and tax exemptions has also led to their increased take-up (Turton 2006 & Lane 2000); however it is questionable what percentage of the general public are actually aware of the government support available. So, there is a general increasing trend in the sales of EFV’s but they are still a long way from achieving their potential. 2.4.1 Reasons behind the low take-up Attempts to introduce EFV’s have so far been unsuccessful (Banister, 2005). When considering what they offer in terms of environmental advantages it seems strange that this is the case but research shows why the take-up has remained so low. Although EFV’s present environmental advantages, motorists simply do not seem to be interested in them. Predominantly, this comes down to their performance and to a lesser extent the supposed extra costs associated with EFV’s. Among the multitude of benefits attributed to cars, (high) speed, reliability, high performance, style/design and fuel autonomy appear to be the more important motoring variables for car users (OECD 2004 & Booth et al. 2001). Freund and Martin (1993) link such preferences with the ‘ideology of the automobile’, in which individual freedom and pleasure have been associated with the speed and mobility that cars provide (Niuewenhuis et al. 2006). These same attributes are not commonly associated with alternative fuelled vehicles and even discounting the additional costs, many of the AFV’s are likely to be disadvantaged based on one or more of the other attributes (OECD, 2004). The ‘chicken and egg problem’ remains a critical barrier to the low take-up of AFV’s – who will build and buy the AFV’s if a fueling infrastructure is not in place and who will build the fueling infrastructure before the AFV’s are built (Romm, 2006). This problem can be applied to the entire range of alternative vehicles listed in section 2.3. 2.4.2 Ensuring the full potential of EFV’s To ensure that the full potential of this technology in contributing towards sustainable development is realised, certain barriers must be overcome. Firstly, public support and awareness to ensure sales and therefore economic production is needed. Secondly, key barriers such as fuel and infrastructural costs and development must be overcome and thirdly, government rebates, subsidies and promotion schemes to create additional confidence and awareness in new AFV technologies must be provided. Of these the most important, in terms of helping AFV’s achieve their potential role in reducing GHG emissions from transport, is their promotion; for without this the need to develop alternative fuels or their infrastructures will never become sufficient to merit its occurrence.

Page 11: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 292 -

A study by the Alternative Fuels Group of the Cleaner Vehicles Task Force (DTIa, 2000) concluded that in terms of the promotion of EFV’s, certain factors must be addressed:

• Increasing the current low knowledge base regarding the potential benefits of cleaner fuels and vehicles.

• Increasing the current low knowledge base regarding the incentives and grants available for cleaner fuels and vehicles.

• Reducing the current resistance to change transport behaviour among vehicle users

• Increasing the current lack of consumer confidence in performance and image of alternative fuel vehicles.

• Perceptions of safety associated with cleaner vehicles. 2.5 The importance of promoting AFV’s To recognise the importance of promoting AFV’s it is beneficial to return to the global problem of increasing GHG emissions from transport and the effects of this on climate change. As Claude Mandil, Executive Director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), said in May 2004,

“In the absence of strong government policies, we project that the worldwide use of oil in transport will nearly double between 2000 and 2030, leading to a similar increase in greenhouse gas emissions” (IEAd, 2004)

Research undertaken by Ben Lane on behalf of the Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership (LowCVP) in 2005 indicated that although consumers in the UK support the concept of purchasing and driving low carbon cars, in reality they do not make low carbon choices (SMMTb, 2006). This highlights the importance of their promotion – if people know about AFV’s but are not buying them then promotion schemes are likely to solve this issue. The impacts of climate change are numerous, including flooding, weather system changes, species extinction and adverse effects of air pollution on public health. Given that transport emissions are contributing an ever-increasing and substantial amount to climate change, the social, environmental and economical benefits of promoting AFV’s and therefore reducing emissions from transport are of monumental importance. 2.6 Schemes to promote the use of EFV’s in the UK 2.6.1 National & International Policy Although they are not dedicated AFV promotion schemes, national and EU policy on reducing CO2 emissions from transport can help to inadvertently promote the use of environmentally friendly vehicles. The governments 10 year transport plan assumed the EU Voluntary ACEA target (to reduce average CO2 emissions from new cars to 140g/km) would be met in the UK (LCVPb, 2006). Following on from this, when it was realised this was an unrealistic target, the 2004 Transport White Paper set a target for future average CO2 emissions from new cars of 152 g/km by 2008 (DFTc 2004 & LCVPb 2006). EU legislation from 1999 means that car dealers are required to have a label showing the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of each different model on display, either on or near the vehicle. Much more recently, in March of this year the UK took another major step towards tackling climate change with the release of a new draft Climate Change Bill. If it comes into force the UK targets for a 60% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050 and a 26-32% reduction by 2020 will become legally binding (DEFRA, 2007). Because it is only a draft bill nothing is certain, however if it becomes legislation then the UK transport sector will have to comply, inadvertently promoting the use of AFV’s.

Page 12: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 293 -

2.6.2 PowerShift Programme The first national scale promotion scheme created by the government was the PowerShift programme, which was created in 1996 to operate on behalf of the Energy Saving Trust (EST). This program subsidizes up to 75 percent of the increased cost of electric, hybrid, CNG, and LPG vehicles (Lane, 2000). Its objectives were to:

• Raise awareness of clean fuel vehicles

• Provide objective information for fleet operators

• Encourage the establishment of a refuelling infrastructure

• Establish standards for clean fuel vehicles

• Reduce the capital cost of clean fuel vehicles Given a budget of £10 million a year to provide grants towards the additional costs of purchasing cleaner fuels, the scheme spent roughly £8 million a year on providing grants for LPG conversions. A PowerShift register was created, comprising of alternative fuel vehicles which are eligible for 100% discount from the London congestion charge. Most of the schemes focus was on providing grants rather than promoting the use of AFV’s. The grant scheme was close in 2005 however the register still exists and is updated on behalf of Transport for London (EST, 2007). During its existence the PowerShift programme funded the conversion to either LPG, electric, hybrid or CNG fuels for 17,000 vehicles (CfIT, 2005). This is a fantastic achievement but had more money been allocated to advertising and the promotion of AFV’s the results could have been even better. Since the PowerShift programme was closed, no new grant scheme has been introduced by the UK government. Although a low carbon car grant programme was developed, it was never developed beyond an idea. Instead the government opted to launch a ‘low carbon transport communications campaign’ to promote EFV’s. As far as it is possible to ascertain, this campaign has not yet had any significant effects, nor does it seem to be campaigning very successfully. 2.6.3 The TransportAction CleanUp Programme The CleanUp programme was launched in 2000 by the EST with the aim of reducing pollution from vehicles operating in urban areas (Brevitt, 2002). It gives grants to operators of commercial and public sector diesel vehicles (including black cabs, lorries, buses, emergency vehicles and refuse trucks) to assist with the cost of fitting emission reduction technologies (CfIT, 2005). Prior to the scheme, PowerShift dealt with grants for buses and minicabs but it was felt that the CleanUp programme could increase the conversion rate to alternative fuels 2.6.4 Powering Future Vehicles Strategy The powering future vehicles strategy (PFVS) was launched by the government in July 2002 (DFTc, 2004). It introduced a new target for low carbon cars which requires 1 in 10 new cars sold in the UK to be low carbon with exhaust emissions of 100g/km of CO2 or less by 2012 (Foley 2003 & DFTc 2004). Its objectives are to:

• promote the development, introduction and uptake of clean, low carbon vehicles and fuels

• ensure the full involvement of the UK automotive industry in the new technologies. In order to achieve these objectives a number of measures have been put into place:

• Fiscal and grant incentives for consumer and business take-up of cleaner, more efficient vehicles and fuels

• Research, development and demonstration funding for new technologies, including the Ultra Low Carbon Car Challenge to develop ultra-efficient family vehicles capable of mass production

It is very difficult to say exactly how effective the strategy has been. In their 2nd annual report many improvements are listed as being positive changes made by the PFVS however some of these improvements, such as a reduction in average CO2 emissions from vehicles, have not necessarily been made simply by the PFVS. Their report has a section entitled ‘Encouraging

Page 13: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 294 -

consumer take-up of clean, low carbon vehicles and fuels’ (DFTd, 2004) but from what is written, it appears that little has been done in terms of promoting consumer take-up. In terms of meeting its target for 10% of cars to have emissions of less than 100g/km, progress has been microscopic. Of the 2.5 million cars sold, only 467 met this target in 2005 (House of Commons, 2006) and in order to meet it by 2012, roughly 250,000 need to be sold a year. One positive to take from the report is that for the first time, in 2003/2004 all available funding was fully utilised (DFTd, 2004). So whether this is as a result of the PFVS or not, at least the public awareness of grant schemes and public take-up of AFV’s is increasing. 2.6.5 The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership (LCVP) The powering future vehicles strategy has also led to the creation of a new joint government-industry body called the Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership. The LCVP is an action and advisory group that aims to promote the shift to low carbon transport, help industry, consumers, environmental and other stakeholders to participate in the shift, and maximise competitive advantage to the UK (DTIc, 2003). 2.6.6 Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) In March 2001 a new Vehicle Excise Duty system for cars was introduced based entirely on CO2 emissions (See Table 2.1). Within each band there is also a discount rate for cars using cleaner fuels and technology as well as a small supplement for diesel. Since its introduction it has been modified each year so that in 2007 there are now seven bands (A-G) and no supplements for diesel vehicles (See Table 2.2).

Table 2.1 – VED Bands based on CO2 emissions in 2001

The VED system means that motorists can save money by choosing the most efficient and least polluting cars. Working out how successful the VED system is proving complex. Some evidence (See Table 2.3) suggests that more people are buying cars in the lower bands (i.e. less polluting) in 2006 than were in 2001 (SMMTc, 2007).

Page 14: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 295 -

Table 2.2 VED as of 2007 and how it compares to VED in 2006.

2007 VED band

CO2 (g/km) Alternative Fuel

Cars Petrol cars Diesel cars

Change from 2006 VED band

A < 100 £0 £0 £0 0

B 101 to 120 £15 £35 £35 -£5

C 121 to 150 £95 £115 £115 +£15

D 151 to 165 £120 £140 £140 +£15

E 166 to 185 £145 £165 £165 +£15

F 186 to 225 £190 £205 £205 +£15

G* > 226 £285 £300 (£400 in

2008) £300 (£400 in

2008) +£90 (+£190 in

2008) *for new cars registered after 23 March 2006 However, other evidence suggests that graduated VED has not influenced consumer choice. Research by MORI for the Department for Transport has shown that new car purchasing is dependent on a number of key factors (price, fuel consumption, size, reliability and comfort) but road tax is not among the most significant (DFTe, 2005). Nevertheless the government believes that the VED system is an important tool in providing signals to consumers about the environmental impacts of their vehicles. Perhaps improvements could be made to the scheme in order for it to better promote the use of EFV’s.

Table 2.3 Distribution of new car market by current VED bands (Source: SMMTc)

VED Band CO2 emissions (g/km)

2001 - % new cars 2006 - % new cars

A < 100 0 0 B 101 to 120 0.1 4.7 C 121 to 150 19.2 31.9 D 151 to 165 23.8 24.2 E 166 to 185 22.7 17 F 186 to 225 24 14.8 G > 226 11.3 7.5

2.7 Overview of Promotion Schemes Research into the UK’s promotion schemes for alternative fuel vehicles reveals that very little has been done to encourage their take-up. Of the above measures, one has now closed and one is a purely fiscal incentive to purchase a less polluting car. The intentions of the remaining strategies are good, but they are predominantly focused on the technological and financial side of the alternative car in pursuit of its promotion, rather than on soft measures. One of the key findings of the Visioning and Backcasting for UK Transport Policy (VIBAT) study was that on their own, technological and fiscal measures will not be enough to drive the take-up of AFV’s and that it is imperative they are accompanied by ‘soft’ measures such as promotion schemes (DFTf, 2006). Overall, there are very few designated promotion schemes for environmentally friendly vehicles and where they exist they seem uncommitted and unplanned. In order to play a truly effective role in promoting and increasing the use of EFV’s, it is essential that the Government is both clear in its own mind as to how to achieve its goals, and shows long term commitment to them.

Page 15: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 296 -

2.8 Why this research is needed – gaps in the literature Despite the fact that their take-up is currently low, alternative fuel vehicles are the best and most complete solution to the problem of reducing GHG emissions from cars as they have the potential to completely eliminate harmful emissions. The literature provides an overview of the transport situation today, the future role of the environmentally friendly vehicle, the different alternative fuel vehicles available, the importance of promoting their use and the current promotion schemes. Having studied a wide range of literature relating to environmentally friendly vehicles, it becomes apparent that gaps do exist. Much of the current research is on the different types of alternative fuels, how sustainable they are and the likelihood of their commercialisation in the future whereas very little research has been carried out concerning the promotion of environmentally friendly vehicles. Having established a gap in the literature, this study aims to research and recommend the best strategies and incentives to promote the use of AFV’s. In order to discover the most effective schemes it is important to understand what the consumers look for in a car and what could sway their minds towards buying an EFV. 3 Methodology In order to complete this project it is important to carry out extensive qualitative and quantitative research related to environmentally friendly cars, as well as public and professional opinion on how their use could be promoted and increased. Qualitative and quantitative data collection will draw on previous literature to explore, explain and discover public opinion on the use and promotion of environmentally friendly cars (Marshall et al. 1999). 3.1 Questionnaires The first method of data collection intended for this investigation is the use of questionnaires. Questionnaires will be used as they are able to provide a fast, cost effective way of discovering the opinion of a sample population in relation to environmentally friendly cars and how their take-up could be increased (Marshall et al. 1999). The reason for using a sample population is because it would not be possible to survey the entire population due to time restraints and difficulties in organising such a scheme (Maykut et al.1994). A sample population which represents all university students (male, female, age ranges) will be chosen. Students are not already set in their ways and as the ‘drivers of tomorrow’ are most likely to be directly affected by changes in the marketing of green cars over the next ten years. 3.1.1 Sampling Method In total, 64 questionnaire responses were gathered during March 2007. A stratified sampling strategy was chosen in order to collect the data. Questionnaires were primarily sent via email whilst a minority were completed with the author present. Distribution of the questionnaire via email has many advantages. Firstly, it increases both the time and cost-efficiency of a piece of research (Hewson et al. 2003). It also avoids the ‘soul destroying’ experience of gaining an individuals attention in the street (McQueen et al. 2002). Instead, the participant can complete the questionnaire in the comfort of their own home or office (Hewson et al. 2003). Finally, it allows for controlled snowball sampling, whereby the researcher can request a participant to forward the email to a group of people who fall into the sample population category. Snowball sampling deals with an inter-connected network of people or organisations (Neuman, 2003) and within this study, enables access to a vast group of potential research participants (Hewson et al. 2003) 3.1.2 Pilot Questionnaire Pilot surveys allow the researcher to find out ‘if the proposed methods of collecting data ‘work’, in terms of achieving their goals’ (McQueen et al. 2002). A pilot questionnaire will be used in order to determine the final questionnaires usefulness and reliability and to identify any changes

Page 16: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 297 -

that will help increase the accuracy of the final questionnaire’s results before it is distributed in full. The pilot questionnaire highlighted several problems with the original design and sampling method which needed to be addressed before the real sample could be collected. Immediately, results from the pilot survey highlighted a problem with the sample population; not enough students had ever personally bought or owned a car and were therefore unable to accurately respond to questions regarding their influences on car-purchasing. For this reason, the sample population was limited to car owners only. Furthermore, it was decided that because only a small percentage of students fall into the car-owners category, the sample population not be limited just to students. This stratified sampling technique was developed in order to obtain samples which were more appropriate for analysis in relation to the subject issue. Another problem identified by the pilot survey involved questions which required the partaker to list several answers (for example, in question 6 the respondent was asked to list what influenced him/her when purchasing a car). Putting pressure on the respondent to give answers in this way was having an adverse effect on the replies in conjunction with perceived difficulties in the data analysis stage. To overcome this it was decided to adopt Likert Scales, enabling easier analysis and interpretation of results as well as greatly reducing the complexity of the questionnaire and time taken for the respondents. 3.1.3 Design The questionnaire was designed to assist in achieving the goals of the research and ultimately to answer the research questions (Robson, 2002). The questionnaire was split into quantitative questions which have structured response categories for comparative analysis and qualitative questions which are open-ended, allowing for the discovery of new ideas which may influence the outcome of the project (Marshall & Rossman, 1999). This design was based upon a study by McQueen et al. (2002), which stated that ‘the most effective and reliable studies contain both quantitative and qualitative questions’. Time considerations meant that the survey is made up predominantly of quantitative questions with brief qualitative questions where appropriate so that the interviewee has the option to expand on certain answers. The questions were chosen carefully so that they did not lead interviewees to a particular stance or response and so that early answers did not influence later ones. These considerations were used to ensure the questionnaire remained unbiased so that results would be more viable and accurate. 3.1.4 Likert Scales Several of the questions are in the form of a 5-point Likert Scale, as a result of modification after the pilot survey. The reasoning for this is that Likert Scales enable easier analysis and interpretation of results as well as greatly reducing the complexity of the questionnaire and time taken for the respondents. When considering the size of the scale, careful consideration was given as ‘too few response categories [can] result in too coarse a scale and loss of much of the [respondents’] discriminative powers… [while] a too fine a scale may go beyond the respondents’ limited powers of discrimination’ (Jacoby et al. 1971). A smaller Likert scale can significantly ‘reduce response time and respondent fatigue’ (Gregg et al. 2001), two important factors which must be considered when interviewing the general public. It was therefore decided to incorporate a 5-point Likert Scale in the appropriate questions as it has been reported that 5 to 7 point scales are the optimal length for a public questionnaire (Green et al. 1970). 3.2 Interviews The second method of qualitative data collection to be used is interviews. Interviews are useful ways of getting large amounts of data quickly (Marshall & Rossman, 1999). The interviews will be held with professionals who will be affected by the promotion and increase of ‘green car’ use. This could include persons within the car manufacturers industry and government transport

Page 17: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 298 -

policy. Interviews will provide detailed professional opinions and feelings (Maykut, 1994) on how it might be possible to promote the use of environmentally friendly cars and why the market has not been taken-up by the public yet. The interviews will be semi-structured insofar as questions will be specified, but expansion beyond the questions may occur if the interviewer wishes to seek clarification or elaboration of certain issues (May, 2001). This gives a greater degree of freedom of conversation to the interview and enables more information to be discovered than a structured interview. The interviews will be completed both in direct contact with the interviewees and via the telephone. Due to time restraints the sample size will be kept to a minimum but so that a good amount of information is collected and can be analysed in comparison with the questionnaires. 3.3 Secondary Data Secondary data in the form of documents will be collected in order to draw links to past research and give detailed background information. By using three different methods of data collection it is hoped that sufficient data is collected from a large enough range of peer reviewed sources, public and professional opinion so that the findings of the investigation are not biased or minority views. This will ensure the best possible data is collected in aim of completing the project. 3.4 Data Analysis Methods Data analysis is the process of bringing order, structure and interpretation to a mass of collected data (Marshall & Rossman, 1999). To compliment the data collected during the questionnaires and interviews, documentary analysis will be used. Research journals as well as formal policy statements can be informative as well as providing both background and specialised data (Marshall & Rossman, 1999). Using documentary analysis in conjunction with the interpretation of the questionnaires and interviews is known as triangulation (Robson, 2002). The analysis of documents will be started very early, even during its collection because it is a very time consuming process. When analysing the data collected from the questionnaires it is difficult to know exactly where to start, though often it is best simply to become familiar with the data (Robson, 2002). There is no clear and accepted single set of conventions for analysis of data from questionnaires (Robson, 2002). Instead an integrated approach to analysis can be used. To analyse data from closed questions, the use of graphical displays and tables enables comparisons to be made within the sample population. This will facilitate the process of identifying patterns and anomalies within the data (Sapsford, 1999). However, the same form of analysis is not possible for open ended questions, which can instead be coded in order to identify similar themes and ideas within the research (Coffey & Atkinson, 1996). This method of data analysis, known as ‘open coding’ splits qualitative data up into discrete parts (Robson, 2002). These codes must be subject to change, as new ideas may arise during analysis (Marshall & Rossman, 1999). Analysing data from the interviews is a complex process, so the small sample population will help to simplify this to a large extent. Respondents’ answers will be coded according to key themes and patterns. Comparative analysis will be used to find anomalies and trends between data from different interviews and these findings will be further analysed in terms of their relation to data from the questionnaires and to secondary data. 3.5 Limitations to Research Methods 3.5.1 Limitations to Questionnaires As with any research limitations are virtually unavoidable, therefore results are rarely 100% accurate or representative. In regard to the questionnaires, one limitation to combining qualitative and quantitative questions is that the effectiveness of qualitative questions in exploring the public’s private opinions is reduced - respondents tend to give an answer that is socially

Page 18: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 299 -

acceptable or what they believe is desired by the researcher (Pole & Lampard, 2002). Other limitations include data being affected by the characteristics of the respondents (memory, personalty etc), misunderstandings of the survey questions by the respondents and respondents not treating the exercise seriously. Each of these can have adverse effects on the viability of the results (Robson, 2002). 3.5.2 Limitations to Interviews Interviews can be particularly time consuming and this combined with a predefined timescale in which to complete the project meant that not as many could be completed as would have been desired. Another drawback of interviews is that their analysis is complex, making it difficult to make comparisons between them (May, 2001). Data collected may be affected by characteristics of the interviewer which could lead to unwittingly forced influences on the interviewee and as well as this, differences between the interviewer/respondent such as class or ethnic background may influence how forthcoming and honest respondents are (Robson, 2002). 4 Results The questionnaire explored the target samples’ knowledge and concerns of climate change whilst attempting to establish potential influencing factors involved with car-buying. The questionnaire also looked at the effect different factors may have on the take-up of environmentally friendly cars and what aspects the respondents felt were important in order to encourage them to buy an environmentally friendly car. The results from the questionnaire are displayed on the following pages. It should be noted that these results are representative of the sample collected and can not be considered as an accurate representation of the general public as a whole. 4.1 Establishing the respondents’ environmental awareness Utilising 5 point Likert Scales, respondents were asked to rank what they considered their knowledge on climate change and their concern of its effects. 4.1.1 Knowledge on Climate Change Respondents were asked to rate their knowledge of climate change on a 5 point Likert Scale where 1 = no knowledge and 5 = high knowledge. These results are shown in figure 4.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Per

centa

ge

of

Sam

ple

Figure 4.1 – A graph to show how respondents ranked their level of knowledge on Climate Change (%).

Figure 4.1 indicates that the public perceive their knowledge on climate change to be relatively good, as shown by a higher percentage ranking their knowledge between the mid and higher end

Page 19: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 300 -

of the Likert Scale. This is further backed up by the mean rank which is calculated to be 3.22, therefore above the scales average middle value of 3. 4.1.2 Concern on the effects of Climate Change Respondents were also asked to rate their concern of the effects of Climate Change using the same 5 point Likert Scale (where 1 = no concern & 5 = high concern). Figure 4.2 shows these results.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Per

cen

tag

e of

Sam

ple

Figure 4.2 – A graph to show how respondents ranked their concern on the effects of Climate Change

(%)

Figure 4.2 illustrates a relatively high level of concern for the effects of Climate Change. Only one person (2%) ranked their concern as below the mid-value of 3, whilst more than half (69%) ranked their concern as 4 or 5. The mean rank of concern was calculated to be 3.80. 4.2 Knowledge of Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Having established the samples’ awareness and concern on Climate Change and its effects, respondents were questioned on their awareness of Alternative Fuel Vehicle’s (AFV’s) and whether they’d seen one advertised. The interviewees responses’ to whether they knew AFV’s exist is shown in figure 4.3.

93.75

6.25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Yes No

Response

Per

centa

ge

of

Sam

ple

Figure 4.3 – A graph to show whether respondents knew that alternative fuel vehicles existed (%)

Figure 4.3 shows that 93.75% of the respondents answered that ‘yes’ they did know alternative fuel vehicles exist. Following this, respondents were asked if they had ever seen an alternative fuel vehicle advertised. The results to this question are illustrated in figure 4.4 which shows that 65% of the interviewees who knew that AFV’s existed had also seen one advertised.

Page 20: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 301 -

65

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Yes No

Response

Per

centa

ge

of

Sam

ple

Figure 4.4 – A graph to show the number of respondents who have seen an alternative fuel vehicle

advertised (%)

4.3 Factors Influencing Respondents Car-Purchasing Choices Question 6 required respondents to rank what factors influenced their car-purchasing decisions. The factors were listed previously; the respondents were simply required to rank their influence on a 5 point Likert Scale (where 1 = not influential and 5 = highly influential). The results were divided into three categories – highly influential factors, moderately influential factors and least influential factors. These results are shown by figures 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 below.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Sa

mp

le

Initial Cost

Reliability

Safety

Figure 4.5 – A graph to show the most highly ranked influential factors on respondents when purchasing

a car (%)

Page 21: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 302 -

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Pe

rcen

tage

of

Sa

mp

le

Design

Comfort

Performance

Fuel Economy

Figure 4.6 – A graph to show the moderately ranked influential factors on respondents when purchasing a

car (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Perc

en

tag

e o

f S

am

ple

Size

VED

Insurance Costs

Figure 4.7 – A graph to show the lowest ranked influential factors on respondents when purchasing a car

(%)

Figure 4.5 shows that the respondents ranked the three most influential factors on car-purchasing to be, in order 1-3; initial cost, reliability and safety. In fact, each was ranked as 5 on the Likert Scale (i.e. as highly influential) by more than 50% of the respondents with both the initial cost and a car’s reliability being ranked 5 by more than 80% of the sample. The figure shows that although safety received a lesser percentage of rank 5 scores, it made up for this with a high number of rank 4 scores. None of the factors were ranked below 3 by respondents and less than 15% of participants ranked any of the factors as 3 on the Likert Scale. The mean rank score for each of the three factors was above 4.5. Figure 4.6 shows what factors the respondents ranked as moderately influential when purchasing a car: design, comfort, performance and fuel economy. The most common ranking for each by respondents was 4 on the Likert Scale, all of them received this ranking from over 60% of respondents. The vast majority of the remaining partakers ranked each factor as 3 or 5, though design and comfort were both ranked as 2 (not very influential) by 6% of participants. The mean ranks for these factors ranges between 3.81 and 4.13.

Page 22: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 303 -

Finally, figure 4.7 shows the least influential factors when purchasing a car, as ranked by respondents. These are size, VED and insurance costs. The ratings for each of these factors are evenly distributed between ranks with no majority choices being made by the sample. VED received the largest number of low ranks, with over 50% of respondents ranking it as 2. Size and insurance costs were more commonly ranked as 3 or 4 and have higher mean rank scores than VED because of this. 4.3.1 Whether respondents are truly influenced by a car’s environmental friendliness Respondents were asked first ‘How much of an influence does a car’s environmental friendliness have on your purchase decision?’ and then ‘When you brought your last car, how much consideration to the car’s environmental friendliness did you give?’ The results, shown below by figure 4.8, illustrate that respondents believed that a cars’ environmentally friendliness would have more influence on their next purchase than it actually had in reality on their last. This is portrayed by the black line, which shows a majority of people gave little or no consideration to the cars environmental friendliness during their last purchase; and the yellow line, which shows respondents believe a cars’ environmental friendliness would have a larger influence on their purchase decision (majority of people ranked its influence as 3 on the Likert Scale).

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Sa

mple

Influence a vehicles'environmental friendliness has onrespondents purchase

Consideration given to vehiclesenvironmentally friendlinessduring respondents last purchase

Figure 4.8 - A graph comparing how much influence a car's environmental friendliness would have on respondents purchase decision compared with how much consideration a car's environmental friendliness had the last time they purchased a car (1=Unimportant/No consideration, 5=Very important/Much

Consideration)

4.3.2 What would influence respondents to purchase an EFV? Question 10 determined that of the 64 participants, only 1 would not purchase an EFV. Question 12 was aimed at discovering what would encourage respondents to buy an EFV. The sample were asked to rank each factor on a scale of 1-5 in regards to how much influence it may have on encouraging them to buy an EFV. Results are shown in figures 4.9, 4.10 and 4.11.

Page 23: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 304 -

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Perc

enta

ge o

f S

am

ple

Reduced Initial EFV Cost

Better EFV technology

Increased EFV performance

Advertising Campaigns

Figure 4.9 – A graph to show respondents’ opinions on what factors would have the largest influences on

them buying an EFV (1= No influence, 5 = Large influence)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Perc

en

tag

e o

f S

am

ple

Increased Knowledge

Better EFV fuel efficiency

Figure 4.10 – A graph to show respondents’ opinions on what factors would have a moderate influence on

them buying an EFV (1= No influence, 5 = Large influence)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rating

Pe

rcen

tag

e o

f S

am

ple

Increased car tax

Increased petrol/diesel prices

Government Grants

Figure 4.11 – A graph to show respondents’ opinions on what factors would have the lowest influences on

them buying an EFV (1= No influence, 5 = Large influence)

Figure 4.9 shows the factors which respondents ranked would have the most influence on encouraging them to buy an EFV: increased EFV performance, reduced initial EFV cost, better

Page 24: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 305 -

EFV technology and advertising campaigns. With the exception of advertising campaigns, all these factors are ranked very similarly to each other, showing that the respondents regard each as having a similar influence on encouraging them to buy an EFV. Between 45-55% of participants ranked each factor as 5 on the Likert scale, whilst 30-40% of those who did not, ranked each factor as 4. Respondents appear to have mixed opinions on the influence advertising would have on encouraging them to buy an EFV, with rankings evenly distributed between 3, 4 and 5. The mean rank scores for these four factors range between 4.45 and 3.80. Figure 4.10 shows which factors respondents ranked as having a moderate influence on encouraging them to buy an EFV: better EFV fuel efficiency and increased knowledge of EFV’s. Both of these factors were predominantly ranked as 4 by respondents and their mean rank scores, in the order listed above, are 4.20 and 3.78. Figure 4.11 shows what factors respondents ranked as having the lowest influence on encouraging them to buy an EFV: increased petrol/diesel prices, government grants and increased car tax. Their mean rank scores are, as in the order above, 3.66, 3.59 and 3.47, showing that although participants still consider them as being influential, these factors are regarded as being less influential in encouraging them to buy an EFV than those mentioned in the prior paragraphs. 4.3.3 Factors which would be important to respondents when buying an EFV. The final question stated that the respondent had hypothetically chosen to buy an EFV, and this being the case asked them to rank 5 out of 10 factors in order 1-5 in terms of their importance in choosing their EFV. The results are shown below by figures 4.12 and 4.13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rank score (1=Very Important, 5=Not important)

Perc

enta

ge o

f S

am

ple

Fuel Efficiency

Performance

Initial Cost

Safety

Reliablilty

Figure 4.12 - A graph to show the most common factors which were identified by respondents as being important if they were to buy an environmentally friendly vehicle (1= most important, 5= less important)

Page 25: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 306 -

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

Rank score (1=Very Important, 5=Not important)

Perc

enta

ge o

f S

am

ple

Insurance Costs

Tax

Size

Design

Vehicles Range (on onetank/charge)

Figure 4.13 - A graph to show the least common factors which were identified by respondents as being important if they were to buy an environmentally friendly vehicle (1= most important, 5= less important)

Figure 4.12 shows that the most important factor to respondents who are, hypothetically, buying an EFV is the initial cost, which received over 75% of participants’ number 1 rank. Of the remaining 9 factors, figure 4.12 shows 4 others which were commonly ranked by respondents between 1 and 5. It shows that besides initial cost, an EFV’s safety was of much importance, followed by its fuel efficiency, performance and reliability. Figure 4.13 shows the remaining 5 factors, all of which were less commonly ranked by respondents therefore identifying them as less important to participants who were hypothetically purchasing an EFV. Design was only ranked between 1 and 5 by a total of 9 participants. 4.4 Qualitative Responses to Survey Questions A total of two open-ended questions were asked to the sample in order to allow respondents to express their opinions on EFV’s and how they could be promoted. Table 4.1 summarises the participant’s responses to the questions.

Table 4.1 – A table summarising participant’s responses to the open-ended questions in the questionnaire

Question Summary

7. Can you think of anything else that may influence your decision to buy a car?

• Among the respondents replies, colour and price depreciation were mentioned most frequently.

• Interestingly, no-one mentioned a cars environmental status

11. What do you think could be done to encourage people to buy more environmentally friendly cars

• Participants often seemed to have some kind of idea of what could be done in order to promote the sales of EFV’s.

• Reducing the cost was mentioned frequently as well as advertising, promoting environmental awareness and ensuring that they can compete with the stereotypical car in terms of performance.

• Incentives and government subsidies were also mentioned as ways to promote EFV’s though they were mentioned by fewer respondents

4.5 Data collected from Interviews A total of four semi-structured interviews were completed with professionals from a range of companies including Saab, ULTra, EST and Toyota. Summarised below are the main findings from the interviews.

Page 26: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 307 -

Table 4.2 - A table summarising interviewee’s responses to questions Qtn Summary of Findings

1. What do you think are the main barriers to the mass production of environmentally friendly vehicles?

• The demand for EFV’s is very low – main barrier

• Cost is very high without demand to ensure sales

• New technology requires new production plants which is expensive

• The process requires the support of managers either in local authorities or large corporations who put their career at risk by taking risky decisions. If they choose the widely accepted option (e.g. in the case of the car a non-hybrid) they are at no risk.

2. Why do you believe that their take-up has been so low?

• There is a lack of awareness as to the reality of the EFV.

• EFV’s stereotyped as being slow and electric - need plugging in to charge

• Perceived as ‘un-cool’ (except in London)

• Supposedly very expensive

• Difficulties in re-fuelling – currently very few locations

• The public is also very conservative, which probably explains to the low take up of Hybrids. This has led to increased cost as a result of a small take up.

3. In your opinion, what measures should be taken to encourage more people to buy EFV’s?

• Increase the cost to drive non-alternative vehicles.

• Subsidies and incentives for EFV’s to be made available, but more importantly to ensure the public know about them

• Advertising campaigns on a national scale

• Making sure that people know the true performance capabilities of EFV’s today – similar to standard petrol/diesel vehicles – plus the advantages associated with them (quieter, more efficient, cheaper to run)

4. Is it a case of improving/fine-tuning the alternative vehicle technologies or of educating the public to increase their awareness of the benefits coupled with EFV’s?

• Vehicle technologies are already extremely advanced, it is more a case of educating the public and convincing them EFV’s are the vehicles of the future

• Without mainstream public knowledge and support EFV sales will always remain very low.

• However, improvements to EFV’s still play an important role in encouraging their take-up. If a big breakthrough were to occur it could kick-start the public into buying EFV’s.

5. When is it likely that EFV’s will occupy a more substantial part of the UK car market?

• Very difficult to estimate; no knowing what technological developments may occur or how proactive the government / car manufacturers will be in the future

• Hopefully occupy 10% of the UK market by 2050

6. Do you feel that the government should be doing more in order to promote the use of EFV’s and if so, how could they do this most effectively?

• The government is not doing enough to promote the use of EFV’s.

• Measures such as increasing VED on heavily polluting cars to £400 make almost no difference – the people who drive these cars paid thousands for them and so an extra £200 a year in road tax is not a big price to pay.

• Currently no available grants for alternative fuel cars – must be remedied immediately. Even small grants could help make a difference to get the market off-the-ground. Obviously once EFV’s occupy a more substantial part of the market grants will have to be stopped or it the cost will be too much.

• A multifaceted strategy must be taken which uses both; ‘push’ factors to encourage people to buy EFV’s and ‘pull’ factors to attract public interest in them

7. Do you feel that car manufacturers should be doing more in order to promote the use of EFV’s and if so, how could they do this most effectively?

• Mixed responses, interviewees from car companies tended to answer that their company was doing enough but that others generally weren’t.

• On the whole it appears that car manufacturers are not doing as much as they could be. Most are researching alternative fuel vehicles or even producing them (though not on a mass-scale) but few are pushing to sell them.

• Increased advertising in order to raise the publics’ awareness to the reality of EFV’s today (i.e. highlighting the fact that many alternative vehicles have performance specs equal to those of a conventional car)

Page 27: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 308 -

5 Discussion This section brings together and analyses the results and findings from the previous sections in relation to each other and to the research questions outlined in section 1.1 of this paper. Following this, recommendations will be provided on how best to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars in the UK. 5.1 Implications of questionnaire / interview results 5.1.1 A willingness to change? It is clear from the results that although public knowledge on climate change is not vast, most are highly concerned with the effects of CC, shown by figure 4.2. In conjunction, the 1998 Lex survey reported that over two-thirds of drivers consider climate change to be a ‘major problem’ in Britain today (Lane, 2000). This is an encouraging sign that people could be willing to do something about the problem. Further evidence for this is provided by figure 5.1, which shows more than 98% of questionnaire participants would consider buying and EFV, and car sale figures released by SMMT which show a sevenfold increase in the sales of EFV’s between 2005 and 2007 (SMMTa, 2006). Overall it seems that people are willing to start changing their ways to help combat CC in terms of emissions from transport, but that certain barriers are preventing this change from occurring at a faster rate.

98.44

1.56

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Yes No

Response

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Sam

ple

Figure 5.1 - A graph to show whether respondents would ever consider buying an environmentally

friendly car (%)

5.1.2 Current influences on car purchasing – can EFV’s compete? In a study by Maclean et al, it was established that in order to displace conventional vehicles, alternative vehicles must be viewed by consumers as at least equally attractive or ‘comparable’ to these conventional vehicles (2003). Maclean identified that these comparable factors are likely to include vehicle price, performance, range, comfort, lifetime, and safety standards (2003). The results of this study reinforce this: figure 4.5 and 4.6 reveal that influential factors in car buying include the initial cost, reliability, performance, comfort, fuel efficiency & safety of a vehicle. Accordingly, to compete with conventional vehicles, EFV’s must offer similar levels of comfort, convenience and performance in order to satisfy the customers’ requirements. Whilst cost appears to be the most influential factor associated with car purchasing (figure 4.5 indicates that over 80% of respondents ranked it as highly influential), cost is also commonly recognised as one of the main drawbacks to alternative fuel vehicles. These additional costs include alternative fuel and vehicle production, fuel distribution and storage; and overall they account for one of the central conditions affecting the widespread use of low emission vehicles.

Page 28: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 309 -

Having studied the different types of EFV available, it does not seem an unreasonable assumption to claim that even if you discount the additional costs, many of them are likely to be disadvantaged based on one or more of these consumer acceptance factors (OECD, 2004). For example, electric vehicles are capable of acceleration rates comparable to conventional vehicles, but use of this acceleration must be quite limited in order to preserve vehicle range. Considering that over 80% of respondents indicated performance was a highly influential factor (see fig 4.6), a consumer would likely be discouraged by this reduced performance of alternative vehicles. Of all the different factors which are generally considered when purchasing a vehicle it seems that environmental characteristics are being given the least attention. A study by the DFT in 2005 revealed that nearly four in five car buyers did not look at a vehicle's emission rating before purchase (DFTe, 2005) and though the results of this study demonstrate improvements on this (at least within the sample), figure 4.8 shows that still almost 60% of drivers gave little/no consideration to their last cars environmental friendliness during purchase. Although today’s alternatives offer huge environmental benefits, these are not being considered by the consumer, nor do they compensate for the loss of other important acceptance factors. In light of this EFV’s are not perceived to compete with current ICE vehicles; thus are of limited commercial attractiveness. However the outlook is not entirely bleak. As technology progresses, the inconveniencing factors currently associated with them could potentially be eliminated; a step towards this has seen by the introduction and now mass-production of HEV’s such as the Toyota Prius, which are almost entirely comparable in terms of their consumer acceptance factors. Although environmentally friendly vehicles may not be able to compete at present, new breakthroughs demonstrate that advanced technology does have attractive contributions to make and could still potentially revolutionise private transport as we know it. 5.1.3 How can the public be influenced to buy an EFV? Ninety percent of all vehicles on the roads are private motor vehicles (Lowson, 1999). In light of the dominance of the private motor vehicle, the increase in the proportion of these which run on alternative fuels will have a significant affect in reducing emissions from transport. It is too late to encourage people to stop using their cars and to start walking, cycling and using public transport – people are set in their ways and will not change to modes of transport which do not offer the same conveniences that the private car currently offers. So, the potential market for the environmentally friendly car, which is by far the most viable solution offering similar conveniences but reduced emissions, is enormous. Currently, in regard to the conventional car, society is getting what it wants at a low cost (Maclean et al, 2003) – so how, might you ask, can the EFV possibly displace it? Research into different approaches to EFV promotion schemes may be far and wide between, but it does highlight certain important factors which could be used as a basis for creating a plan to increase their uptake in the future (Leiby & Rubin, 2001). Firstly, it is essential that the public become more aware of the issues surrounding GHG emissions from transport and the potential role of EFV’s in combating this. The importance of the publics’ understanding the severity of the problem becomes evident if we consider the potential for a reduction in the environmental impact of transport through changes in consumer behaviour (Lane, 2000). From the results, we can see that the public themselves have identified increased knowledge and advertising as fundamental aspects which are likely to increase the likelihood of them purchasing an EFV. Their respective average rankings were 3.78 and 3.80 on a Likert Scale of 1-5, signifying that participants felt increased knowledge and awareness of EFV’s would have an encouraging effect on influencing them to buy one. Not only was it identified by respondents that an improved knowledge base and awareness of EFV’s was required but also, as shown by figure 4.9, that improved EFV performance,

Page 29: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 310 -

technology and reduced initial cost would increase their uptake. However in analysing these results, it becomes apparent that underlying them is the lack of knowledge and awareness which was highlighted in the above paragraphs. It is likely that respondents do not realise just how advanced EFV technology (including performance levels) truly is. Consequently, more effort is needed to improve awareness, particularly in regards to increasing consumers’ knowledgebase on EFV’s performance and image (DTIa, 2000). Interpreting figure 4.12 shows that environmentally friendly cars need to be shown to compete with existing models in terms of their safety, reliability, design and fuel efficiency. This needs to be promoted in line with the fact that EFV’s also help ‘save the planet’ which appeals to people wishing to salve their conscience or ‘go green’. In terms of promoting the use of environmentally friendly vehicles it is important to draw attention to how their increased uptake will directly benefit the public (Banister, 2005). This will ensure that the measure will be accepted by the vast majority. On one hand, It is commonly recognised that private car use decreases the quality of life in urban areas due to noise and air pollution (Greene et al 1997, Nilsson et al 2000) as well as the wider effects of GHG emissions from increased CO2 (ozone depletion, acid rain, smog) (Banister, 2005). On the other, EFV’s offer individual health improvements as well as a better quality of environment. Surely this is a message that can and should be easy to sell to the public in order to aid in promoting the use of EFV’s? Although it is essential that the public must be made more aware of environmentally friendly cars, arguably one of the main influences on their take-up is the initial cost. Figure 4.12 shows that initial cost was ranked as the most important factor in terms of its influence when, hypothetically, purchasing an EFV and in concurrence with this, it was shown in figure 4.9 that reduced initial cost of EFV’s would have a large influence on their take-up. The additional cost of manufacturing alternative vehicles is estimated by the OECD to be: 10% for LPG vehicles, 15-20% for C/LNG vehicles, 30% for Hybrids and between 10-20% for FCV’s (when mass-produced) (2004). In the case of FCV’s, although it is anticipated that in mass production the additional cost should not be more than 10-20%, because they are currently not mass-produced it is estimated that present FCV production cost is between €150,000 – €300,000 (Schwoon, 2006). This problem is known to affect a variety of alternative vehicles which are currently not mass-produced and can not easily be overcome without high demand to enable them to be cost-effectively mass-produced (OECD, 2004). This constitutes a significant obstacle to rapid development of the technology. In order to overcome the difficulties posed by the additional costs of EFV’s the IPCC observed that in order to be adopted by the public, alternative technologies require tax advantages, cost subsidies or additional cost-reducing or performance-enhancing research and development (IPCCb, 2001). However, these cost-reduction measures must be substantial in order to make any noticeable difference to the up-take of EFV’s (Leiby & Rubin, 2001). A study by Schwoon concluded that a gradual tax has only ‘relatively minor impacts’ in the short run and would take many years in order to create a noticeable increase in the sale of EFV’s (2006). In comparison, a shock tax would be more successful in increasing the up-take of EFV’s, but would be less preferred by consumers and would encourage people to buy one for the wrong reasons. As well as vehicle tax, Maclean established that incentives such as reduced fuel tax on alternative fuels are also important in order to influence market reactions (2003). Overall then, it seems that influencing the public to buy an EFV is far from being a straightforward task. To do so will require a multi-faceted approach which utilises both push to encourage people to buy EFV’s and pull factors to attract public interest in them. 5.1.4 Other conditions affecting the take-up of low-emission vehicles In addition to a lack of awareness and advertising and to high initial costs, there are some other important conditions affecting the take-up of EFV’s. Foremost is a lack of policy and legislation associated with promoting their use. Without more stringent European and British legislation which favours alternative fuel technologies, Leiby & Rubin found that it may be difficult for the

Page 30: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 311 -

alternative fuel vehicle market to get started (2001). The government must play a larger role in promoting the use of EFV’s, not only through new tougher legislation but also through providing financial and other incentives to facilitate alternative fuel and vehicle technology innovation and to support vehicles with demonstrated improvements in environmental performance (OECD, 2004). Another condition affecting their take take-up is the ‘chicken and egg’ problem. Essentially on one hand, producers are not willing to produce EFV’s so long as there are no filling stations providing the appropriate fuels whilst on the other hand an infrastructure for alternative fuels will not be set up unless there is a noticeable demand generated by a significant number of EFV’s on the road (Schwoon 2006 & Romm 2006). How to overcome this problem remains one of the many critical issues in a complex web which currently accounts for the low take-up of AFV’s. 5.2 Research questions answered

Table 5.1 – A table to link analysis with research questions

Research Question Summary Answer

1. What are the reasons behind the lack of environmentally friendly cars being sold?

• Lack of knowledge / awareness of EFV’s and associated technology

• High initial costs

• Lack of policy and legislation promoting alternative vehicles

• ‘Chicken and egg’ problem

• Current low-cost and convenience of petrol/diesel powered conventional vehicles.

2. What more can be done in order to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars?

• Increase knowledge and awareness of EFV’s

• Advertise and promote their use

• More stringent policy and legislation in order to promote alternatives and discourage current conventional vehicles.

• Increased government subsidies and incentives.

• Increased EFV technology

• Beneficial performance features, such as drive quietness and smoothness.

• Reductions in vehicle cost

• Possible vehicle access restrictions to city centres for all but low-emission vehicles.

3. What do the public feel would influence them to buy an environmentally friendly car?

• Reduced initial EFV cost

• Better EFV technology and fuel efficiency

• More positive advertising

• Increased knowledge of the current situation

• Government subsidies

• Incentives 4. When is it likely that ‘green cars’ will occupy a more substantial part of the motor vehicle market?

• There is currently no real idea of when ‘green cars’ will occupy a more substantial part of the market. Many predictions have been made all based on different scenarios which predict that ‘green cars’ will occupy a more substantial part of the market anytime between 2020 and 2050.

• In order to effectively answer this question further research must be conducted.

5.3 Recommendations In order to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars in the UK much change is required. It is evident from the study that in order to increase the use of EFV’s they need to be supported and promoted by the government (for example, grants and exemptions, advertising campaigns) and to gain widespread consumer acceptance. Therefore a strategy to

Page 31: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 312 -

increase and promote their use must combine all of these factors into a multifaceted approach towards sustainable travel (Turton, 2006). Research by the SMMT revealed that if every consumer simply chose the most carbon-efficient car in each segment of the market, there would be a reduction in average new car emissions of up to 30% (House of Commons, 2006). Consequently, this study is of the opinion that at the very least the government must encourage the public to buy the most efficient cars in each VED band. In order to accomplish this, a set of policy regulations must be introduced including promotion schemes, increased car tax and possible subsidies to drivers of LEV’s. Although it may indirectly raise peoples awareness of the issue of GHG emissions from transport, therefore encouraging them to purchase an EFV, simply encouraging people to buy cleaner conventional vehicles will not directly promote or increase the use of EFV’s, thus more needs to be done. In reality, to increase and promote their use, a holistic integrated strategy must be put into place. In the short term, the strategy must aim to promote and increase the publics’ awareness and knowledge of EFV’s and the related technologies. Increased advertising may be the most effective way of achieving this. Current misperceptions must be eliminated – people need to understand that the EFV offers the same benefits that the conventional car does as well as the added bonus of being ‘environmentally friendly’. In conjunction with raising public awareness, the government must develop a plan to combat the current cost-related issues associated with EFV’s. The need for co-ordinated fiscal incentives has been recognised by many in order to promote sustainable transport (OECD 2004, Brevitt 2002, Zachariadis 2006). Taxes must be increased more substantially on the use and purchase of petrol / diesel vehicles in addition to tax incentives, grants and subsidies for LEV’s. Not only will this discourage people from buying conventional vehicles but it will also encourage people to buy EFV’s. Finally, once the take-up of EFV’s is augmenting, the strategy must aim to develop and implement a new alternative fuel/vehicle infrastructure, one of the current major barriers to the introduction of some alternative technologies (DTIa, 2000). This implementation must be started sooner rather than later, or people will be put off buying EFV’s in light of a lack of convenience in refuelling. Overall it is clear that much needs to be done in order to promote and increase the use of the EFV. Change can not be expected over night and though their uptake is currently slow, the implementation of new and improved promotion schemes and legislation could significantly boost the uptake and use of environmentally friendly vehicles in the future. 6 Conclusion The objective of this paper was to establish how it may be possible to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars in the UK. A literature review outlined the wider problem posed by GHG emissions from transport, considered the range of different environmentally friendly vehicles available to combat this problem and examined the reasons behind the current lack of EFV’s on the road. Questionnaires and interviews were conducted and the results were examined in correlation with past literature in order to determine possible strategies to increase and promote the use of EFV’s in the UK in the future. There is a vast range of alternative vehicle technologies, all of which offer different social, economic and environmental advantages and disadvantages. Currently, the most promising of these is the hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), in particularly the Toyota Prius, whose sales account for the majority of EFV’s sold in the UK. It is likely that the HEV will be the dominant EFV in the near-term but that it may be replaced by the fuel cell vehicle (FCV), which offers zero local emissions and potentially zero total emissions, in the future. Due to technological constraints and a lack of demand it is not yet feasible to mass produce the FCV and producing them on a smaller scale entails huge economic costs.

Page 32: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 313 -

In examining the reasons behind the current lack of alternative vehicles on the roads in the UK it becomes apparent that it is a combination of factors which have led us to the situation we are in today. These factors include: a lack of public knowledge and awareness of EFV’s, additional costs of alternative technologies, cost and difficulty of developing new infrastructure, a considerable shortage of effective promotion schemes and an insufficient level of stringent European and National legislation promoting the use of EFV’s. It is therefore apparent that a realistic strategy to promote and increase their use must incorporate plans to resolve each individual factor as well as approaching the issue as an entirety. In order to determine how to increase public use of EFV’s the survey focused on what influences peoples car-purchasing choices and what they felt would influence them to buy an EFV. Utilising the results from the survey, recommendations for an all inclusive, multifaceted strategy were made. To succeed, it is important that it does not rely on technological advances but instead relies on increasing public knowledge and awareness of the benefits associated with EFV’s. Overall, it seems that EFV’s can and must have an instrumental role in reducing GHG emissions from transport. A new strategy for their promotion is an essential step towards their increased use and can be expected to prove more effective than simply waiting on technological advances; however the implementation of this comprehensive strategy will take time and money to get off the ground and make the difference it has the potential to. Changing the stance of a nation to realise the importance of converting to EFV’s will take a long time, and even if a new strategy is adopted, it appears unlikely that EFV’s will occupy a substantial proportion of the market before 2050. This research has provided a greater understanding behind the current low take-up of environmentally friendly cars and how to remediate the current situation in order to achieve sustainable road transport. However, it is important that further research be conducted in order to obtain a more comprehensive view on what influences peoples car-purchasing choices and how they can be influenced to buy an EFV. This research paper makes recommendations for a strategy to promote and increase the use of environmentally friendly cars yet it would be beneficial if supplementary research be carried out in order to establish the feasibility and specifics of the intended proposal. Expansion on this study and other related research will enable the development and implementation of a strategy which will eliminate the problem of GHG emissions from transport through the promotion and increased use of EFV’s. Acknowledgements I wish to thank every person who took part in the questionnaire as well as the interviewees; Tom Denton (Toyota), Martin Lowson (ULTra), Matt Rance (Saab) & Alan Smith (Who’s name has been changed in order to uphold anonymity) (EST). Finally, I would like to express my thanks to Dr. Miles Tight for his continuous advice and assistance throughout the project

Page 33: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 314 -

References Aslam MU; Masjuki HH; Kalam MA; Abdesselam H; Mahlia TMI; Amalina MA (2006). An

experimental investigation of CNG as an alternative fuel for a retrofitted gasoline vehicle. Fuel. Volume 85 (5-6): 717-724

Banister D (2005). Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century. Abingdon,UK: Routledge.

Bender M (1999). Economic Feasibility Review for Community-scale Farmer Cooperatives for Biodiesel, Bioresource Technology. Volume 70 (1): 81-87

BoostLPG. (2007). Why Choose LPG? [Online]. [Accessed 24/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.boostlpg.co.uk/driver_industry/why_LPG.htm>

Booth M; Buglass JG; Unsworth JF (2001). Tailoring Fuels for the New Millennium. Topics In Catalysis. Volume 16 (1-4): 39-46.

Brevitt B (2002). Alternative Vehicle Fuels. Science and Environment Section, House Of Commons Library. Research Paper 02/11.

Cannell MGR. (1999). Forests, Kyoto and Climate. Outlook on Agriculture. Volume 28: 171-177. CBS News. (2005). Hybrid Sales Keep Growing. Press Release, issued 25th April 2005. [Online].

[Accessed 28/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/04/25/tech/main690845.shtml>

CfIT (Commission for Integrated Transport). (Unpublished, 2005). Transport and climate change - CfIT response to DEFRA consultation. Report dated 28th November 2005. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.cfit.gov.uk/docs/2005/ccdefra/03.htm>

Coffey A; Atkinson P (1996). Making Sense of Qualitative data – Complementary Research Strategies. London: SAGE Publications: 26-32.

DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). (2007). Draft Climate Change Bill Published. Press Release, issue dated 13th March 2007. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07] - <http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/latest/2007/climate-0313.htm>

Demirbas A (2007). Progress and Recent Trends in Biofuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. Volume 33 (1): 1-18

DFTa (Department for Transport). (1998). A new deal for transport: better for everyone - white paper. [Online]. [Accessed on 12/11/06] - Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_about/documents/page/dft_about_610276.hcsp>

DFTb (Department for Transport). (2000). Transport Ten Year Plan 2000. [Online]. [Accessed on 12/11/06]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_about/documents/page/dft_about_503944.hcsp>

DFTc (Department for Transport). (2004). The Future of Transport - White Paper CM 6234. [Online]. [Accessed on 12/11/06]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_about/documents/divisionhomepage/031259.hcsp>

DFTd (Department for Transport). (Unpublished, 2004). Powering Future Vehicles – The Government Strategy Second Annual Report. Report dated October 2004. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/poweringfuturevehicles/poweringfuturevehiclesthegov3815>

DFTe (Department for Transport). (Unpublished, 2005). Assessing the Impact of Graduated Vehicle Excise Duty - Quantitative Research. Report dated 26th October 2005. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/research/consumerbehaviour/assessingtheimpactofgraduate3817>

DFTf (Department for Transport). (Unpubslihed, 2006). Looking Over the Horizon - Visioning and Backcasting for UK Transport Policy. Produced by David Banister & Robin Hickman for the DFT. Report dated January 2006. [Online]. [Accessed 1/4/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucft696/vibat2.html>

Page 34: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 315 -

DoE (U.S. Department of Energy). (2005). What is Natural Gas? [Online]. [Accessed 27/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/altfuel/whatis_gas.html>

DTIa. (Unpublished, 2000). The Report of the Alternative Fuels Group of the Cleaner Vehicles Task Force: An assessment of the Emissions Performance of Alternative and Conventional Fuels. Report Dated January 2000. [Online]. [Accessed 1/4/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.cleanairnet.org/infopool/1411/articles-35613_assessment_emission.pdf>

DTIb (Department of Trade and Industry). (Unpublished, 2003). Energy from biofuels technology route map. Report Dated January 2003.

DTIc (Department of Trade and Industry). (Unpublished, 2003). Energy White Paper: Our Energy Future – Creating a Low Carbon Economy. Report Dated 2003

Dubois JC (1999). The Fuel Cell and the Electrical Vehicle. Actualite Chemistry. Volume 1: 19-26 ENGVA (European Natural Gas Vehicle Association). (2006). LNG as a Vehicle Fuel. [Online].

[Accessed 27/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://engva.org/Content.aspx?PageID=198>

EUROPA. (2007). Commission plans legislative framework to ensure the EU meets its target for cutting CO2 emissions from cars. Press Release, issued 7th February 2007.

EST (Energy Saving Trust). (2007). London Congestion Charge Discount. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/fleet/Informationcentre/FundingandGrants/LondonCongestionChargediscount/>

ETSU (Energy Technology Support Unit). (1996). Alternative Road Transport Fuels – A Preliminary Life-cycle Study for the UK. London: HMSO

Frank AA (2007). Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles for a Sustainable Future. American Scientist. Volume 95 (2): 158-165.

Foley J (2003). Tomorrow’s Low Carbon Cars: Driving innovation and long term investment in low carbon cars. IPPR’s motoring towards sustainability programme.

Freund P; Martin G (1993). The Ecology of the Automobile. Toronto: Black Rose Books. Garling T; Schuitema G (2007). Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car

Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility. Journal of Social Issues. Volume 63 (1): 139-153.

Green PE; Rao VR (1970). Rating Scales and Information Recovery – How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use? Journal of Marketing. Volume 34 (3): 33-39

Greene D; Wegener M (1997). Sustainable transport. Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 5: 177-190.

Gregg PM; Salisbury PS (2001). Confirming and Expanding the Usefulness of the Extended Satisfaction with Life Scale (ESWLS). Social Indicators Research. Volume 54: 1-16

Hewson C; Yule P; Laurent D; Vogel C (2003). Internet Research Methods – A practical guide for the social and behavioural sciences. London: SAGE Publications: 36-46

House of Commons. (2006). Environmental Audit – Ninth Report. [Online]. [Accessed 1/4/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmenvaud/981/98106.htm#note78>

IANGV (International Association for Natural Gas Vehicles). (2007). Statistics – International Statistics. [Online]. [Accessed 27/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.iangv.org/content/view/17/35/>

IEAa (International Energy Agency). (2001). Saving Oil and Reducing CO2 Emissions in Transport: Options and Strategies. Paris: IEA

IEAb (International Energy Agency). (Unpublished, 2003). Transport Technologies and Policies for Energy Security and CO2 Reductions. Report dated March 2003.

IEAc (International Energy Agency). (2004). Biofuels for Transport – An International Perspective. Paris: IEA

IEAd. (2004). IEA, Biofuels for Transport. Press Release, issued 11th May 2004. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web – <http://www.iea.org/Textbase/press/pressdetail.asp?PRESS_REL_ID=127>

Page 35: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 316 -

IPCCa (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2001) Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis – Summary for Policymakers [Online]. [Accessed 16/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/007.htm>

IPCCb (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2001) Climate Change 2001: Working Group III: Mitigation – The Role Of Technology. [Online]. [Accessed 24/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg3/052.htm>

Jacoby J; Mattell M (1971). Three Point Likert Scales are Good Enough. Journal of Marketing Research. Volume 8 (1): 495-500

Jefferson M (2006). Sustainable energy development: performance and prospects, Renewable Energy. Volume 31 (5): 571-582.

Kwon T (2005). A scenario analysis of CO2 emission trends from car travel: Great Britain 2000–2030. Transport Policy, Volume 12 (3): 175-184.

Lane B (2000). Public Understanding of the Environmental Impact of Road Transport. Pubilc Understanding Of Science. Volume 9 (2): 165-174.

LCVPa (Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership). (2005). Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership: Accelerating the shift to low carbon vehicles and fuels. Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership. HARPS Ltd. Essex

LCVPb (Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership). (2006). Reducing Carbon from Transport Inquiry. [Online]. [Accessed 29/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/reports/LowCVP%20Submission%20to%20EAC%202006%20final.pdf>

Leiby P; Rubin J (2001). Effectiveness and efficiency of policies to promote alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Record. Volume 1750: 84-91

Lipman TE; Delucchi MA (2006). A Retail and Life Cost Analysis of Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and the Environment. Volume 11 (2): 115-132.

Lowson M (1999). Personal public transport. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Transport, Volume 135 (3): 139-151.

Maclean HL; Lave LB (2003). Evaluating Automobile Fuel/Propulsion System Technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. Volume 29 (1): 1-69

Marshall C; Rossman GB (1999). Designing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE: 129-131. May T (2001). Social Research: Issues, Methods and Processes. Philadelphia: Open University Press: 88-

125. Maykut P; Morehouse R (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research – A Philosophic and Practical Guide.

Great Britain: Routeledge: 79-92. McQueen R; Knussen C (2002). Research Methods for Social Science - An Introduction. Harlow: Pearson

Education Limited Mizsey P; Newson E (2001). Comparison of Different Vehicle Power Trains. Journal of Power

Sources. Volume 102 (1-2): 205-209 Neuman WL (2003). Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 5th Edition.

Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon: 213-311 Nieuwenhuis P; Wells P (2003). The Automotive Industry and the Environment: A Technical, Business and

Social Future. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Nieuwenhuis P; Wells P; Vergragt P (2006). The Business of Sustainable Mobility: From Vision to

Reality. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Nijkamp P (1994). Roads Toward Environmentally Sustainable Transport. Transportation Research

Part A: Policy and Practice. Volume 28 (4): 261-27 Nilsson M; Küller R (2000). Travel Behaviour and Environmental Concern. Transportation Research

Part D. Volume 5: 211-234 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (Unpublished, 2004). Can

Cars Come Clean? Strategies for Low Emission Vehicles. Report Dated 2004. Orindi VA; Murray LA (2005). Adapting to Climate Change in East Africa: A Strategic

Approach. Gatekeeper Series (Managed By International Institute for Environment and Development). Volume 117: 1-24

Ozcimen D; Karaosmanoglu F (2004). Production and characterization of bio-oil and biochar from rapeseed cake, Renewable Energy. Volume 29 (5): 779-787

Peake S (1997). Vehicle and Fuel Challenges Beyond 2000: Market Impacts of the EU’s Oil Programme. London: Financial Times Automotive Publishing

Page 36: Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK

Ward-Jones RS (2008) Environmentally Friendly Cars: Promoting and increasing their use in the UK. Earth & E-nvironment 3:282-317

- 317 -

Pischinger S (2004). The Future of Vehicle Propulsion – Combustion Engines and Alternatives. Topics in Catalysis. Volume 30 (1-4): 5-16

Pischinger S; Schonfelder C; Ogrzewalla H (2006). Analysis of dynamic requirements for fuel cell systems for vehicle applications. Journal of Power Sources. Volume 154 (2): 420-427.

Pole C; Lampard R (2002) Practical Social Investigation: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Research. Harlow: Prentice Hall

Price L; Michaelis L; Worrell E; Khrushch M (1998). Sectoral trends and driving forces of global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Volume 3 (2-4): 263-319.

Price P; Guo SM; Hirschmann M (2004). Performance of an evaporator for a LPG powered vehicle. Applied Thermal Engineering. Volume 24 (8-9): 1179-1194

Richards B (2001). Future Transport in Cities. London, UK: Spon Press Robson C (2002). Real World Research (Second Edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd: 230-267 Romm J (2006). The Car and Fuel of the Future. Energy Policy. Volume 34 (17): 2609-2614 Saab Automobile. (Unpublished, 2006). Base Document Biofuels. Report Dated February 2006. Sapsford RJ (1999). Survey Research. London: Sage Publications: 1-24 Schwoon M (2006). Simulating the Adoption of Fuel Cell Vehicles. Journal of Evolutionary

Economics. Volume 16 (4): 435-472 SMMTa (The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders U.K.). (2006). The UK automotive sector

towards sustainability. Seventh annual report. [Online]. [Accessed on 19/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://smmtlib.findlay.co.uk/articles/sharedfolder/Publications/7th%20Sustainability%20report.pdf>

SMMTb (The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders U.K.). (Unpublished, 2006). UK New Car Registrations by CO2 Performance – Report on the 2005 Market. Report dated April 2006.

SMMTc (The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders U.K.). (2007). Green posturing drives up tax burden for families, says SMMT. Press release, dated 21/03/07.

Sperling D (1995). Future Drive – Electric Vehicles and Sustainable Transportation. USA: Island Press Tight MR; Bristow AL; Pridmore A; May AD (2005). What is a sustainable level of CO2

emissions from transport activity in the UK in 2050? Transport Policy. Volume 12: 235-244. The Times Online. (2006). EU law will force worst polluting cars off the road. Times Online

Website. [Online]. [Accessed on 11/11/06] - Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,200-2444215.html>

Total UK. (2007). Total LPG. [Online]. [Accessed 24/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.total.co.uk/uk/ukcorporate.nsf/VS_OPM/67FBBB75FEF141E7C1256EB4002A3518?OpenDocument>

Tsioliaridou E; Bakos G; Nakicenovic N (2004). Clean Fuels and Alternative Vehicles for Sustainable Development in Transportation. Published Online by WEC (World Energy Council). [Online]. [Accessed 25/03/07]. Available from World Wide Web - <http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/congress/papers/tsioliaridoue0904ys.pdf>

Turton H (2006). Sustainable Global Automobile Transport in the 21st Century: An Integrated Scenario Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Volume 73: 607-629

Tzeng GH; Lin CW; Opricovic S (2005). Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy. Volume 33 (11): 1373-1383

WCED (World Commision on Environment & Development). (1987). Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williamson AM; Badr O; Probert SD (1997). Reliance of British transport on fossil fuels: Associated adverse impacts on air quality. Applied Energy. Volume 56 (1): 27-45.

Zachariadis T (2006). On the baseline evolution of automobile fuel economy in Europe. Energy Policy. Volume 34: 1773-1785