environmental site investigation
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW 2015
29 August 2019
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd is an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks of KPMG International.
Prepared for: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Level 25
420 George Street Sydney NSW 2000
Prepared by: KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Limited ABN 53 103 479 992
Tower Three, International Towers Sydney
300 Barangaroo Avenue Sydney NSW 2000 (P O Box H67 Australia Square 1215)
Phone: +61 2 9335 7000
KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Quality Assurance Auditing
KPMG SGA Project No.: 364678 Date of Investigation 12-13 August 2019
File name: 364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Issue Number: Date Issued: Report Status
01 23 August 2019 DRAFT
02 29 August 2019 FINAL
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Contents 1 Executive Summary 1
2 Object and Scope of Works 2
3 Site Characteristics 3
3.1 Site Location, Identification and Description 3 3.2 Topography and Drainage 3 3.3 Geology, Soils and Hydrogeology 3 3.4 Contaminated Land Record EPA Notices 4 3.5 Public Register of POEO Licenses 5 3.6 Review of Site History 5 3.7 Previous Environmental Investigations 7
4 Data Quality Objectives 9
5 Investigation Levels and Beneficial Uses 13
6 Conceptual Site Model and Application of Investigation Levels 14
7 Field Investigation 15
7.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan 15 7.2 Fieldwork, Soil Stratigraphy and Drilling Observations 15 7.3 Laboratory Analysis 15 7.4 Quality Assurance 16
8 Laboratory Results 17
8.1 Soil 17
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
9 Discussion 18
10 Conclusion and Recommendations 19
11 Limitations 20
12 References 21
Appendix A Site Figures
Appendix B Guidelines
Appendix C Borehole Logs
Appendix D Laboratory Results Summary and Transcripts
Appendix E Quality Control and Assurance
Appendix F Borehole Logs
Appendix G Report Limitations
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 1
1 Executive Summary
KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd (KPMG SGA) were engaged by Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd (Lend Lease c/- JLL) to undertake an Environmental Site Investigation (ESI) at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (the site). The purpose of the ESI was to assess for the presence and nature of chemicals of concern (COCs) in soil as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site, at the conclusion of the Lease as per the lease agreement for the site.
Based on a review of site history, the site has been historically used for industrial purposes since the 1910’s with the current site buildings comprising of warehouses and adjoining offices being constructed in the late 1970’s and used for the storage of documents and logistics purposes. A previous environmental audit investigation undertaken in 2001 by Peter J Ramsay and Associates (PJRA) (Reference 6) identified low concentrations of heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and total cyanide within soil samples collected, however the concentrations were below the relevant investigation level guidelines. Trace amounts of asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified in the soil samples collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, which were considered to be associated with the building rubble present in these areas sourced from the demolition of previous buildings on the site in the late 1970’s. PJRA considered the site suitable for continued commercial / industrial use and recommended that an additional environmental investigation should be undertaken at the conclusion of the tenant’s lease to determine if any impacts to the soil and/or groundwater had occurred as a result of the tenant’s activities on the site.
Current site activities considered to represent potential sources of COCs included general warehousing activities. Historical industrial land use and uncontrolled filling of the site during its development also represents a potential source of COCs. At the time of the investigation, the site was occupied by Iron Mountain, the majority of the internal warehouse area was undergoing make good operations and was previously used as a data and document storage facility.
The ESI included drilling of twenty three (23) soil investigation boreholes (BH01 to BH23), which were advanced using hand auger and push tube techniques across the site with soil sampling undertaken. A total of thirty eight (38) soil samples (including three (3) intra-laboratory duplicate samples) were collected and analysed with laboratory analysis undertaken for a range of COCs associated with site operations.
The concentrations of COCs within all soil samples analysed were the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) and/or below the adopted human health assessment criteria for commercial/industrial use. The concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and heavy metals (copper and zinc) exceed the adopted ecological assessment criteria for commercial / industrial land use at isolated locations. These criteria are not considered to be directly applicable to the investigated areas given their current condition and vegetation in areas investigated appeared to be in good health with no evidence of obvious stress. Although EILs and ESLs have been utilised during this investigation, they are not considered to be directly relevant to the soil beneath the investigated areas due to specific factors (i.e. hardstand warehouse and carp park area, lack of significant vegetation, intended land use and highly disturbed environment. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals and PAHs are likely attributed to imported fill material and no as a results of warehouse activities.
Based upon the findings of the ESI, the site is no adversely affected by COCs as a result of warehousing activities that would preclude the use of the site for continued commercial / industrial purposes.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 2
2 Object and Scope of Works
KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd (KPMG SGA) was engaged by Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd (Lend Lease c/- JLL) to undertake an Environmental Site Investigation (ESI) at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (the site). The purpose of the ESI was to assess the presence and nature of chemicals of concern (COCs) within soil and the extent of the COC impact as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site, at the conclusion of the Lease as per the least agreement for the site.
The following scope of works was undertaken:
• review provided existing environmental documentation
• review of relevant soil, geology and groundwater information to determine potential mobility of COCs (if present)
• review of historical aerial photographs and business directories to identify former site uses and layout
• develop data quality objectives for the project with reference to the USEPA (1994) – Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process
• provide a sampling plan detailing the proposed drilling locations
• undertake a ‘Dial Before You Dig’ search and location of underground services using a service locator
• drilling of twenty three (23) soil investigation boreholes on a targeted basis to at least 0.5 metres into natural soil or until refusal is met with allowance for a maximum depth of 2.0 metres below ground level (mbgl)
• collection of soil samples at each borehole including from any fill, disturbed or visually impacted layers
• laboratory analysis of selected samples at a NATA accredited laboratory for COCs including heavy metals, total recoverable hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (collectively known as BTEX), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), phenols and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
• fieldworks and sampling were undertaken to KPMG SGA’s standard quality assurance including the collection and analysis of duplicate samples for quality purposes
• provision of this Environmental Site Investigation report detailing the findings of the field investigation and the evaluation of laboratory results.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 3
3 Site Characteristics
3.1 Site Location, Identification and Description The site is located at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (Figure 1). At the time of investigation undertaken by KPMG SGA on 12 and 13 August 2019, a large warehouse building was present on the site, surrounded by loading docks, a hardstand access way along the eastern boundary, a single-storey office building within the north western portion of the site and an open paved car park within the north eastern portion of the site. The warehouse was operational for the use as a data and document storage facility by Iron Mountain Pty Ltd (Iron Mountain). The site surface was sealed by concrete and/or asphalt with the exception of several small grass covered area in the north western, western and south eastern corners of the site.
The surrounding area consists predominantly of industrial (warehouse style) properties and Sydney Park to the north-west of the site and Alexandra Canal to the south-east of the site. Site details are summarised in Table 1 below and the site layout is presented in Figure 2.
Site Details Item Details
Address 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW 2015
Land Identifier Lot 2 DP709175
Total Site Area Approximately 1.27 Ha
Local Government Authority City of Sydney
Site Location Map Figure 1
Site Feature Map Figure 2
3.2 Topography and Drainage The site is located on generally flat land with a gentle slope towards the east. The surrounding area also was generally sloping towards the east. The site is located at between approximately 17 and 20 metres Australian Height Datum (mAHD).
The nearest surface water body is Alexandra Canal located approximately 150 m to the east of the site.
The majority of surface runoff onsite appeared to be collected and drained into the municipal stormwater system. Limited unsealed areas were observed at the site and it is expected that any rainfall infiltration into the underlying soil would be minimal. Drainage grates were also observed within the outdoor parking area located within the north eastern portion of the site.
3.3 Geology, Soils and Hydrogeology The geology underlying the site, as described in the Geological Survey NSW (1977) – Sydney 1:100,000 Geological Sheet 9130 consists of Quaternary aged medium to fine grained marine sand with podsols.
The Australian Soil Resource Information System (ASRIS) describes the site soils as Podosol. Podosols are described by the Australian Soil Classification System as soils with B horizons
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 4
dominated by the accumulation of compounds of organic matter, aluminium and/or iron and are generally highly sandy and acidic. ASRIS describes the site as being located in an area of low probability of occurrence of acid sulfate soils.
The soil lithology encountered during the investigation generally comprised:
• 0.0 to 1.3 mbgl – fill material consisting of brown-dark brown and light grey, fine to coarse grained silty sand with gravels and rootles and dark brown/light grey medium/coarse grained gravelly sand
• 0.6 to 1.6 mbgl – light brown-dark brown, fine grained silty sand, slightly moist to moist
• 0.5 to 2.1 mbgl – light grey-dark grey, fine grained silty sand, slightly moist to moist
• 0.4 to 2.2 mbgl – light yellow-yellow, fine grained silty sand with crushed sandstone moist to very moist
A more detailed description of lithology is presented at the borehole logs within Appendix F.
A search of the Bureau of Meteorology Australian Groundwater Explorer identified eight (8) registered groundwater bores within a 500 metre radius of the site, which were used for monitoring purposes. The nearest groundwater wells (GW114561 and GW114562) are located approximately 320 metres north east and were installed to a maximum depth of 4.0 mbgl. No water bearing zone details were provided, however as the well casing was only installed to 1.0 mbgl followed by well screening installed to 4.0 mbgl, it is expected that groundwater would have been encountered between these depths.
Based on the site elevation, location and limited soil, geology and groundwater information, the uppermost water bearing zone at the site is be expected to be encountered at relatively shall depths (less than 5 mbgl) within the upper layers of sand. Overall groundwater is expected to flow in a soothly direction with regional groundwater flow towards Alexandra Canal eventually discharging to the Cooks River. Based upon this information, the potential for migration of any COCs within this geological system is considered to be high.
3.4 Contaminated Land Record EPA Notices A search of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) record of notices under section 58 of the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (CLM Act) was carried out on 5 August 2019 for the suburb of Alexandria, NSW. The search has identified that the site is not:
• the subject of an order made under Part 3 of the CLM Act
• the subject of an approved voluntary management proposal under Section 17 of the CLM Act that has not been fully carried out and where the approval of the EPA has not been revoked
• the subject of a site audit statement provided to EPA under section 53B of the CLM Act that relate to significantly contaminated land
• the subject of actions taken by the EPA under section 35 or 36 of the Environmentally Hazardous Chemicals Act 1985 (EHC Act).
A search of the NSW EPA List of NSW contaminated sites notified to EPA under section 60 of the CLM Act was carried out on 5 August 2019 for the suburb of Alexandria, NSW. No listings were identified for the site, however Sydney Park located approximately 100 metres north-west (assumed to be up hydro geologically gradient) of the site was declared by the NSWP EPA to be significantly contaminated.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 5
3.5 Public Register of POEO Licenses A search of the public register of licenses issued under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO) was carried out on 7 August 2019. While no listings were identified for the immediate site, a number of adjacent sites were found to have active POEO licenses. One operator, Dial A Dump Industries Pty Ltd at 76-82 Burrows Road, Alexandria, NSW, located approximately 50m south east of the site, was issued a licence variation in 2015 for Waste Storage – other types of waste including “wood waste”, “garden waste”, “building and demolition waste” and “soils” and non-thermal treatment of general waste. Given the distance from the site plus the surrounding topography, it is unlikely that any associated impacts from the operator would affect the site.
3.6 Review of Site History
Historical Aerial Photographs
A review of aerial photographs from 1930 to 2019 was undertaken as part of this assessment. Details of the photographs reviewed and the key findings of our review are listed in the following table:
Historical Aerial Photographs Review
Photo Information Site Use Offsite Use
Date: 1930 Commercial/Industrial.
The site comprised of a medium-sized rectangular shaped industrial warehouse style building and two smaller office type buildings and an unpaved outdoor parking area, which occupied the central and eastern portions of the site. A small drainage channel is located along the northern boundary, which flows to the canal to the east. The northern and western portions of the site appeared to be undeveloped and unsealed comprising vacant land.
Vacant, Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
Surrounding land comprised industrial properties to the north and east of the site. A large canal (Alexandra Canal) is located to the east of the site. Smaller industrial properties including two cylindrical structures (i.e. silos) are located to the south west and west within a large area of disturbed vacant sandy land. Residential properties occupied the areas to the north of the site.
Run: 16
Photo: 3428
Source: NSW Department of Lands
Date: 1943 Commercial/Industrial.
The western area of the site had undergone development, a large adjoining industrial warehouse type building had been constructed. The smaller type buildings had been demolished and replaced with a large office building within the eastern portion of the site.
Vacant, Residential, and Commercial/Industrial.
A number of large industrial storage type buildings had been constructed to the east of the site, which bordered Alexandra Canal and a large factory type building had been constructed to the south west of the site.
Run: N/A
Photo: N/A
Source: Six Maps
Date: 1951 Commercial/Industrial.
No discernable changes.
Vacant, Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
Areas to the east of the site had undergone significant industrial development, several large industrial depot and factory type buildings had been constructed in previously vacant land.
Run: 15
Photo: 467-29
Source: NSW Department of Lands
Date: 1961 Commercial/Industrial. Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
Run: N/A
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 6
Photo Information Site Use Offsite Use
Photo: N/A Areas within the northern portion of the side had been sealed with concrete pavement.
The larger vacant area to the north-west and west of the site had undergone significant earthworks and appeared to be a waste and disposal depot with the construction of several access roads and quarries.
Source: NSW Department of Lands
Date: 1970 Commercial/Industrial.
No discernable changes.
Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
Areas to the south had undergone further commercial/industrial development and several large storage type buildings which bordered Alexandra Canal had been demolished and replaced with a large industrial distribution complex Continued earthworks and excavation had been conducted to the west of the site. Quarries north west of the site had been filled.
Run: 19
Photo: 1909-5008
Source: NSW Department of Lands
Date: 1982 Commercial/Industrial.
All former buildings on the site had been demolished. The current warehouse building, adjacent office building, and outdoor parking area had been constructed on the site.
Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
Shipping container facilities had been constructed to the north-west and south-west of the site. Continued earthworks and fill operations had occurred to the area west of the site.
Run: 24
Photo: 3241-115
Source: NSW Department of Lands
Date: 1994 Commercial/Industrial.
No discernable changes.
Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
The industrial waste or disposal depot and industrial facilities to the west of the had been demolished and appeared to be undergoing development into recreational parklands
Run: 11
Photo: 153-164
Source: NSW Department of Lands
Date: 2005 Commercial/Industrial.
No discernable changes. Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
The construction of Sydney Park had been completed to the west of the site. Several large multi-storey office buildings had been constructed to the south of the site. Smaller industrial properties to the north-west of the site had been demolished and a large residential apartment complex had been constructed.
Run: N/A
Photo: N/A
Source: Google Earth
Date: 2011 Commercial/Industrial.
No discernable changes. Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
Several large storage warehouse type buildings south east of the site had been demolished on the eastern side of Alexandra Canal.
Run: N/A
Photo: N/A
Source: Nearmap
Date: 2019 Commercial/Industrial.
No discernable changes. Residential and Commercial/Industrial.
No significant changes. Run: N/A
Photo: N/A
Source: Nearmap
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 7
Site History Summary
Based upon the above information, it would appear the site was occupied by a number of small office buildings and medium to large commercial/industrial warehouse style buildings from at least 1930 until 1970s, when the former buildings were demolished and the current warehouse building, adjacent office building and outdoor parking area was constructed between 1970 and 1982 with no significant changes noted to the site since. The surrounding areas appeared to have been comprised of commercial/industrial, residential and vacant land from at least the 1930s with various areas to the east and south undergoing significant commercial/industrial development. The industrial waste/disposal depot to the west of the site had also be redeveloped in recreational parklands (Sydney Park).
3.7 Previous Environmental Investigations The following reports have been previously prepared for the site and has been reviewed.
Document Title: Environmental Audit, 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, New South Wales
Prepared By: Peter J Ramsay & Associates (PJRA)d
Dated: 7 May 2015
Key Objective:
To assess the presence of chemicals of concern (COCs) and establish a baseline for the site contamination and waste management at the site. The report formed Exhibit 2 as part of the Lease dated 12 August 2001 between Custodian Two Pty Limited (as Lessor) and Ausdoc Information management Pty Limited (as Lessee) in relation to the property at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW.
Key Scope of Works:
The key scope of works included:
• Review of relevant documentation provided by Project Consulting Pty Limited (Project Consulting) and Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited (Lend Lease).
• Review of government databases and historical information for the site which included historical aerial photographs, current and historical title deeds etc. to establish previous land uses and developments.
• Review of environmental setting for geological, hydrogeological information relating to the site.
• A site inspection conducted on 2 and 6 February 2001, which included:
o identification of underground facilities and waste disposal areas which may have resulted in COC impact to the site
o drilling of nine (9) boreholes across the site to a maximum depth of 2.2 metres below ground level (mbgl) based on the review of site history, site inspection and assessment of the geology and hydrogeology of the site
o collection of a total of fourteen (14) primary and one (1) composite soil samples
o a soil vapour survey for volatile organic compounds using a photo-ionisation detector (PID).
• Laboratory analysis of soil samples for a range of COCs including: heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs), phenols, pH, asbestos, electrical conductivity (EC), total cyanide and fluoride.
• A soil vapour survey for volatile organic compounds using a photo-ionisation detector (PID).
• Evaluation of contaminant characteristics, fate and transport, potential harm to human health and the environment, off-site impacts and exposure paths.
• A hazardous substances assessment, which included a hazardous materials survey conducted by Piers Millner & Associates (PMA) for asbestos and other building materials such as PCBs and lead in paint.
• Provision of a report present the data of the investigation with recommendations for the site in accordance with guidelines for the assessment and management of site contamination and EPA requirements.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 8
Key Findings:
The following key findings were made by PJRA:
• Review of site history and historical aerial photographs indicated that the site and surrounding areas have been used for industrial purposes since at least the 1910s.
• The site was not registered with the EPA under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 or the Unhealthy Building Land Act 1990.
• Concentrations of heavy metals, PAHs, MAHs, TPHs, OCPs, PCBs, VCHs, phenols, total cyanide and fluoride detected within soil samples were below the relevant investigation level guidelines.
• Trace asbestos was detected in two of the four samples of fill material analysed within soil borehole 1A and 7A, collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, respectively.
• The sub-surface soil profile comprised of fill material from approximately 0.5 mbgl to 1.3 mbgl consisting of light yellow –grey gravelly sand, light brown clayey gravel, and dark brown clayey sand and natural material from approximately 0.6 mbgl to 2.2 mbgl, consisting of light brown/dark grey silty clay and dark brown-dark grey silty sand
• Non-friable asbestos was identified/suspected in the form of vinyl floor tiles, fibre cement eaves and electrical backing boards.
• SMF containing products were visually identified as insulation on the hot water tanks and in air condition ducts and roof of the site buildings.
• No suspected PCB containing equipment or lead containing paint was identified by PMA.
• The concentrations of all soil samples analysed were below the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM, 1999) Health Investigation Levels for Commercial/Industrial land use.
Key Conclusions
PJRA provided the following conclusions a:
• Review of site history indicated that the site and surrounding areas had been used for industrial purposes since the 1910s.
• The current office/warehouse buildings were constructed in the late 1970s and used for the storage of documents and freight.
• No evidence of above ground and/or underground storage tanks (ASTs and/or USTs) observed on the site.
• No significant quantities of hazardous or dangerous goods, or waste were stored on the site, which presented a risk of COC impact to the soil or stormwater.
• Trace asbestos was identified in the soil samples collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, it was the opinion of PJRA that the asbestos was associated with the building rubble present in these areas and likely to have arisen during the demolition of previous buildings on the site in the late 1970s
• The site was considered by PJRA suitable for commercial/industrial land use.
Key Recommendations:
PJRA provided the following conclusions and recommendations:
• A Site Management Plan should be implemented to manage any future excavation works in the grassed areas of the site.
• All asbestos containing building materials should be labelled or removed from the site by an appropriately licenced contractor.
• Should the property be purchased, an additional environmental investigation should be undertaken at the conclusion of the tenant’s lease to determine if any COC impacts to the soil and/or groundwater had occurred as a result of the tenant’s activities on the site.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 9
4 Data Quality Objectives
Development of data quality objectives (DQOs) for each project is a requirement of National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (Amended 2013) (NEPM ASC) (Reference 5). This is based on a DQO process formulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for contaminated land assessment and remediation. The method provides sound guidance for a consistent approach in understanding site assessment and remediation.
The DQO process has seven steps. Each of these steps has been given due consideration in the undertaking of this project. In brief, these steps are:
Step 1: State the problem and establish the DQO team.
Step 2: Determine the possible and probable actions that will resolve the problems.
Step 3: Identify the informational inputs to assist in the problem resolution.
Step 4: Define the boundaries of the study (geographical, temporal, etc.).
Step 5: Develop and define decision rules.
Step 6: Specify tolerable limits to reduce probability of incorrect decisions.
Step 7: Ensure the quality of the information obtained.
Step 1 State the Problem
It is understood that a lease agreement for the site is in place between Lend Lease as Lessor and Iron Mountain as Lessee. It is understood that an Environmental Site Investigation is required to assess any environmental impact as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site is present at the conclusion of the lease.
Step 2 Identify the Decision
The principal decisions to be made are:
• what are the potential sources of COCs on the site?
• what are the nominated COCs associated with the site’s operation?
• what are the suitable human health and ecological criteria for the current/proposed land use?
• what are the concentrations of these COCs within soil?
• are concentrations of the nominated COCs within soil above the site criteria when evaluated using the nominated decision rules?
Step 3 Identify the Inputs to the Decision
The study inputs comprised existing information and information collected during the site investigation. These included:
• review of site characteristics (Section 3)
• observations made during the field investigation (Section 6)
• soil laboratory results using NATA accredited methods (Section 7 and Appendix C)
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 10
• consideration of laboratory results with reference to relevant guidelines (Section 9 and Appendix D).
Step 4 Define the Study Boundaries
Temporally the study is limited to site conditions at the time of the investigation. The scope of the study is limited to that described in Section 2.0. The physical boundary of the study area is defined in Section 3.1 and shown on Figures 1 and 2.
Practical constraints to the collection of data include:
• the physical constraints posed by buildings, site structures and hardstand surfaces
• constraints posed by site operations, underground services, overhead services and landscaping
• the financial budget approved by the client.
The nominated COCs for soil are based on a range of COCs potentially associated with likely chemicals used and stored at the site. The following groups of primary COCs have been derived from this information:
• petroleum hydrocarbons as reported by total recoverable hydrocarbon (TRH) analysis
• benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX)
• polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
• volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
• heavy metals
• phenols.
Individual sample results will be discussed in terms of site impact and directly compared to the nominated site criteria to assess if they are at concentrations suitable for commercial/industrial land use.
Step 5 Develop and Define Decision Rules
Under the DQO process, it is important to nominate action levels for decision making.
In order to make a correct decision, the input laboratory data obtained needs to be confirmed to be suitable. Acceptable limits for field data analysis (relative percent differences (RPDs) for primary and duplicate results) are less than 50 percent, however a range of up to 150% can be acceptable (depending on the origin of the sample and volatility of the chemicals present). Acceptable limits for laboratory duplicate analysis will be set based on site specific information such as background concentrations. These are summarised in as the measurement data quality indicators (MDQIs) (Table 2), which will be used to establish whether the DQOs have been met.
It should be noted that NEPM ASC references Standards Australia AS 4482.1 (Reference 1), which specifies MDQIs for precision should be ≤50% RPD. However, they also acknowledge that low concentrations and organic compounds in particular, can be acceptably outside this range. AS 4482.1 (Reference 1) suggests that ≤50% RPD be used as a ‘trigger’ and values above this level of repeatability need to be noted and explained.
Due to the small scope of this investigation, inter laboratory duplicates will not be assessed.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 11
Measurement Data Quality Indicators
Parameters Procedure Minimum Frequency
>5<10 x LOR4 >10 x LOR
Precision (Repeatability) Field Duplicates 1 in 20 (for metals and semi volatiles)
<80-100 RPD <50-80 RPD
Field Duplicates 1 in 20 (volatiles) <150 RPD <130 RPD
Lab Replicate 1 in 20 <50 RPD <30 RPD
Accuracy Reference
Material
1 in 10 60% to 140% R 80% to 120% R
Matrix spikes 1 in 10 60% to 140% R 80% to 120% R
Surrogate spikes 1 in 10 60% to 140% R 80% to 120% R
Representativeness Reagent Blanks 1 per batch No detection No detection
Holding Times Every sample
Blanks Trip Blank 1 per batch No detection No detection
Trip Spike 1 per batch No detection No detection
Rinsate Blanks 1 per batch No detection No detection
Sensitivity Limit of Reporting Every sample 2 x LOR < investigation criteria
Notes: 1. RPD – relative percentage difference 2. % R – percent recovery 3. LOR – limit of reporting 4. no limit at <5x LOR 5. the MDQI is usually specified in the standard method. If not, use the default values set out in this table
Once laboratory data for the COC has been deemed suitable for use, based on the Measurement Data Quality Indicators presented in Table 2, the following decision rules will be used to make an assessment if concentrations of COCs are acceptable levels from a human health and ecological risk perspective as suggested by Reference 5:
Proposed decision rules for soil (where there is considered to be sufficient data):
• the 95% upper confidence level of the COC must be below the nominated investigation level
• the mean concentration of the COCs must be below the nominated investigation level
• no single sample concentration can exceed 250% of the nominated investigation level
• the standard deviation of the COC population must be below 50% of the investigation level
The nominated investigation levels are discussed in Section 5.0.
As such, if statistical analysis of concentrations of individual COCs are in agreement with the decision rule then concentrations of COCs onsite will be considered to be below the investigation criteria. If the contrary occurs, then further investigation, remediation or risk assessment may be warranted.
Statistical analysis will only be warranted when elevated concentrations of COCs are detected.
Step 6 Specify Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors
There are two types of decision errors. If one assumes that the site is impacted by COCs (the null hypothesis):
a) deciding that the site is not impacted when it actually is (Type I error). The consequence of this error may be unacceptable ecological or health risk for future users of the site
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 12
b) deciding that the site is impacted when it is not (Type II error). The consequence of this error is that the client or a future potential owner will pay for further investigation / remediation that is not necessary
If the null hypothesis position that the site is impacted is adopted, the estimation of a 95% UCL will reduce the occurrence of decision Error (a) errors to 5%.
Step 7 Optimise the Design
During the DQO process the sampling design was optimised through several iterations. Optimisation of the design included evaluating Steps 1-6 of the DQO process. The following are the key steps taken to optimise the sample design:
• review of site operations based on site plans including the location of site infrastructure
• revisions of intrusive investigation locations on site prior to drilling works taking into account access constraints, location of underground services, infrastructure and WHS considerations
• adjustment of sample analysis plan based on field observations and soil samples collected.
The final field program and sampling pattern is considered optimal taking into account the purpose of the investigation, access constraints, budget and temporal limitations. A detailed discussion on the sampling program is presented in Appendix E.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 13
5 Investigation Levels and Beneficial Uses
The National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (NEPM 1999) (Reference 5) is made under the National Environment Protection Council Act 1994 and was developed to establish a nationally consistent approach to the assessment of site contamination to ensure sound environmental management practices by the community which includes regulators, site assessors, environmental auditors, landowners, developers and industry. The NEPM 1999 was amended on 16 May 2013, which will be referred to as NEPM ASC, and has been officially implemented nationally.
The NEPM ASC Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater provides a framework for the use of investigation and screening levels for soil, soil gas and groundwater. The framework is based on a matrix of human health, ecological, and groundwater investigation and screening levels in conjunction with guidance for specific contaminants. The investigation levels and screening levels presented in the NEPM ASC are the concentrations of a contaminant above which further appropriate investigation and evaluation would be required.
The guidelines include:
• Ecological Investigation Levels (EILs) - for selected metals and organic substances and are applicable for assessing risk to terrestrial ecosystems – not applicable.
• Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs) - for selected petroleum hydrocarbon compounds and total recoverable hydrocarbon (TRH) fractions and are applicable for assessing risk to terrestrial ecosystems – applicable.
• Health Investigation Levels (HILs) - for a broad range of metals and organic substances. The HILs are applicable for assessing human health risk via all relevant pathways of exposure – applicable.
• Health Screening Levels (HSLs) - for selected total recoverable hydrocarbon compounds and fractions and are applicable to assessing human health risk via the inhalation and direct contact pathways – applicable.
• Petroleum Hydrocarbon Management Limits (Management Limits) - are applicable to petroleum hydrocarbon compounds only. They are applicable as screening levels following evaluation of human health and ecological risks and risks to groundwater resources. They are relevant for operating sites where significant sub-surface leakage of petroleum compounds has occurred and when decommissioning industrial and commercial sites. The Management Limits are only applied where applicable – applicable.
Application of these investigation and screening levels form the basis of a Tier 1 risk assessment.
Groundwater was not assessed as part of this investigation. Considering the site use and lack of sensitive ecological receptors at the site, it is considered that EILs and ESLs are not directly applicable for this investigation.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 14
6 Conceptual Site Model and Application of Investigation Levels
Based on the findings of the site inspection, the conceptual site model (CSM) in Appendix D has been developed. This includes a detailed summary of the CSM as well as the source-pathway-receptor analysis and application of relevant investigation levels. A summary of the applicable investigation levels of the potential source of COCs is summarised in Table 3, below
Summary of Applicable Investigation Levels Potential Source of COCs Media Applicable Investigation Level
General site sources (e.g. historical industrial land use, fill material)
Soil NEPM EILS, ESLs, HSLs, HILs & Management Limits
The levels of risk associated with these potential sources of COCs is highly dependent on site specific information such as COC constituency and concentrations, subsurface material, the permeability of local soil and rock, and depth to groundwater. These factors are assessed via a desktop study and the field investigation and considered during CSM development.
The site has been assessed for continued commercial/industrial land use suitability. The relevant land use scenario are therefore considered to be commercial / industrial criteria level guidelines presented in the relevant guidelines. It should be noted that a future change of land use may require additional investigation to determine the site’s suitability for the intended land use.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 15
7 Field Investigation
7.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan In general, borehole locations were designed to provide site coverage whilst targeting the identified areas of potential environmental impact/concern. Soil borehole locations are shown on Figure 2. The laboratory analysis schedule for samples was derived from the potential COCs associated with the industrial use of the site.
The presence of structural and tenancy walls, underground services, and tenant access permission issues influence the final investigation locations.
The rationale for sampling locations is presented in Table 4. Further information on the rationale for sampling pattern selection and density is presented in Appendix E.
Rational for Sampling Locations
Investigation Location
Sample type Targeting Justification
BH01to BH23 Soil To assess the concentrations of COCs in soil within previous historical borehole locations (PRA, 2001) and across the site to provide adequate site coverage.
7.2 Fieldwork, Soil Stratigraphy and Drilling Observations The intrusive field works were undertaken on 12 and 13 August 2019. The investigation boreholes were advanced by contractors Stratacore Drilling Pty Ltd (Stratacore) using a Geoprobe 6712DT track-mounted drill rig equipped with a push tube sampler.
Borehole locations are presented on Figure 2 and borehole logs are presented in Appendix F.
In general, the soil stratigraphy at the site can be summarised as:
• fill material/disturbed natural soil consisting of brown-dark brown and light grey, fine to coarse grained silty sand with gravels and rootlets and dark brown/light grey medium/coarse grained gravelly sand encountered to depths ranging between approximately 0.0 and 1.3 mbgl overlying
• light brown-dark brown, light grey-dark grey and yellow-light yellow, fine grained, dense to very dense silty sand.
No significant visual or olfactory indicators which would suggest soil impact by COCs were observed during the site investigation.
Each soil sample was collected with disposable nitrile gloves and placed into laboratory provided glass jars with Teflon lids and minimal headspace. Each sample container was clearly labelled with the project number, sample location and date of sample collection using a waterproof marker. Upon collection, samples were immediately placed into a chilled cooler for storage and later transport to the laboratory.
7.3 Laboratory Analysis A total of thirty eight (38) primary soil samples and three (3) intra-laboratory duplicate soil sample were collected and sent to Envirolab Services (Envirolab) in Sydney and were analysed for COCs,
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 16
using NATA accredited methods. Samples were selectively analysed for TRH, BTEX, PAH, VOCs, PCBs, phenols and heavy metals. A summary of the analytical schedules are presented in Table 5.
Laboratory results are presented in Table C1 (Appendix C), where the results are compared to the investigation levels.
Soil Analytical Schedule
7.4 Quality Assurance The quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures undertaken as part of this project are outlined in Appendix E of this report and procedures are referenced in NEPM ASC (Reference 7). Field procedures were designed to ensure the prevention/minimisation of cross-contamination, analyte loss and to ensure samples and results were representative of actual conditions.
Three (3) soil field duplicate samples were collected and analysed. The results of the duplicate samples were compared to those of the primary samples as a measure of method precision. The calculated RPDs of the duplicate samples were within acceptable ranges.
A detailed discussion on quality procedures and results for this investigation is presented in Appendix E. In general, the quality of the data set was considered to be reliable and acceptable.
Media Sample ID
Maximum sample depth (mbgl)
No. of samples COCs Locations
Primary samples per location
Total primary samples
Intralab duplicate samples
Interlab duplicate samples
Soil BH01 to BH23
2.0 to 2.1 2 to 3 38 3 0 Heavy metals, TRH, BTEX, PAHs, phenols, VOCs and PCBs
Refer to Figure 2
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 17
8 Laboratory Results
A summary of the soil laboratory results are presented in Table C1 in Appendix C. A full copy of the NATA accredited laboratory reports are also presented in Appendix C.
8.1 Soil • Concentrations of COCs within all soil samples analysed were below the adopted human health
guidelines for commercial / industrial land use.
• Concentrations of COCs within soil samples analysed were below the adopted ecological guidelines for commercial / industrial land use with the exception of:
o concentrations of zinc (700 mg/kg) detected within one (1) sample BH15_0.5-0.6 which exceeded the NEPM ASC generic EILs of 360 mg/kg
o concentrations of copper (170 mg/kg) detected within one (1) sample BH20_1.0-1.1 which exceed the NEPM ASC generic EILs of 140 mg/kg
o concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene were detected within two (2) samples BH15_0.5-0.6 (2.2 mg/kg) and BH16_1.0-1.1(4.5 mg/kg) which exceeded the NEPM ASC ESLs of 1.4 mg/kg.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 18
9 Discussion
KPMG SGA were engaged by Lend Lease c/- JLL to undertake an ESI for due diligence and end of lease purposes at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW. The purpose of the ESI was to assess for the presence and nature of COCs in soil as a result of the tenants’ activities on the site, at the conclusion of the Lease as per the lease agreement for the site.
Based on a review of site history, the site has been historically used for industrial purposes since the 1910’s with the current site buildings comprising of warehouses and adjoining offices being constructed in the late 1970’s and used for the storage of documents and logistics purposes. A previous environmental audit investigation undertaken in 2001 by Peter J Ramsay and Associates (PJRA) (Reference 6) identified low concentrations of heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and total cyanide within soil samples collected, however the concentrations were below the relevant investigation level guidelines. Trace amounts of asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified in the soil samples collected from the grassed areas in the east and west of the site, which were considered to be associated with the building rubble present in these areas sourced from the demolition of previous buildings on the site in the late 1970’s. PJRA considered the site suitable for continued commercial / industrial use and recommended that an additional environmental investigation should be undertaken at the conclusion of the tenant’s lease to determine if any impacts to the soil and/or groundwater had occurred as a result of the tenant’s activities on the site.
Current site activities considered to represent potential sources of COCs included general warehousing activities. Historical industrial land use and uncontrolled filling of the site during its development also represents a potential source of COCs. At the time of the investigation, the site was occupied by Iron Mountain, the majority of the internal warehouse area was undergoing make good operations and was previously used as a data and document storage facility.
The ESI included drilling of twenty three (23) soil investigation boreholes (BH01 to BH23), which were advanced using hand auger and push tube techniques across the site with soil sampling undertaken. A total of thirty eight (38) soil samples (including three (3) intra-laboratory duplicate samples) were collected and analysed with laboratory analysis undertaken for a range of COCs associated with site operations.
The concentrations of COCs within all soil samples analysed were the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) and/or below the adopted human health assessment criteria for commercial/industrial use. The concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and heavy metals (copper and zinc) exceed the adopted ecological assessment criteria for commercial / industrial land use at isolated locations. These criteria are not considered to be directly applicable to the investigated areas given their current condition and vegetation in areas investigated appeared to be in good health with no evidence of obvious stress. Although EILs and ESLs have been utilised during this investigation, they are not considered to be directly relevant to the soil beneath the investigated areas due to specific factors (i.e. hardstand warehouse and carp park area, lack of significant vegetation, intended land use and highly disturbed environment. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals and PAHs are likely attributed to imported fill material and no as a results of warehouse activities.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 19
10 Conclusion and Recommendations
Based upon the findings of the ESI, the site is no adversely affected by COCs as a result of warehousing activities that would preclude the use of the site for continued commercial / industrial purposes.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 20
11 Limitations
This report has been prepared by KPMG SGA in response to and subject to the following limitations:
1. The specific instructions received from Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd.
2. The Professional Services Agreement from KPMG SGA to Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd, dated 5 August 2019.
3. The report has been prepared to a specific scope of works as set out in Section 2.0 of this report.
4. May not be relied upon by any third party not named in this report for any purpose except with the prior written consent of KPMG SGA (which consent may or may not be given at the discretion of KPMG SGA).
5. This report comprises the formal report, documentation sections, tables, figures and appendices as referred to in the index to this report and must not be released to any third party or copied in part without all the material included in this report for any reason.
6. The report only relates to the site area referred to in the Section 3.1 of this report being located at 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW (“the site”) and further described in Figure 2.
7. The report relates to the site as at the date of the investigation as conditions may change thereafter due to natural processes and/or site activities.
8. No warranty or guarantee is made in regard to any other use than as specified in the scope of works.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19 21
12 References
1. AS 4482.1—2005 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially
contaminated soil, part 1: non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds, Standards Australia.
2. AS 4482.2—1999 Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil, part
2: volatile substances, Standards Australia.
3. CSIRO Australia Australian Soil Resource Information System. http://www.asris.csiro.au
4. Geological Survey of New South Wales (1991) – 1:100,000 Penrith
5. National Environment Protection Council (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment
of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM) (Amended 2013)
6. Peter J Ramsay & Associates, Environmental Audit, 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW,
prepared for Project Consulting Pty Limited and Lend Lease real Estate Investments Limited,
dated 22 February 2001
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX A FIGURES
KPMG SGA Property ConsultancyABN 53 103 479 992Tower 3 Phone: +61 2 9535 7000International Towers Sydney Fax: +61 2 9535 7001300 Barangaroo Avenue Email: [email protected] NSW 2000 Web: www.sgaproperty.com KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd is an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australianpartnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affilated with KPMG International Cooperative (”KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
CLIENT
PROJECT
TITLE
SCALE
DRAWN CHECKED
DATE
JOB No.
DRAWING No. ISSUE
N
Source: Google Maps
Approximate Scale (m)
0 100
A364678 - Figure 1364678A.P.BM.L.
29/08/2019NTS
Figure 1 - Site Location
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee forAustralian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
Environmental Site Investigation,112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
SITE LOCATION
KPMG SGA Property ConsultancyABN 53 103 479 992Tower 3 Phone: +61 2 9535 7000International Towers Sydney Fax: +61 2 9535 7001300 Barangaroo Avenue Email: [email protected] NSW 2000 Web: www.sgaproperty.com KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd is an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australianpartnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affilated with KPMG International Cooperative (”KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
CLIENT
PROJECT
TITLE
SCALE
DRAWN CHECKED
DATE
JOB No.
DRAWING No. ISSUE
A364678A.P.BM.L.
29/08/2019NTS
Environmental Site Investigation112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW 2015
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee forAustralian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
Notes:Source Nearmap
364678_Figure 2
364678 - Figure 2
Approximate Scale (m)
0 50
N
Site Boundary
Burro
ws R
oad
KPMG SGA Soil Borehole Location
Historical Soil Borehole (PJRA, 2001)
Document StorageWarehouse
Receiving/DistributionWarehouse
BH03BH04
BH08
BH02
BH09
BH06
Offices
Eust
on R
oad
BH01
BH05
BH10
BH11
BH07
BH14
BH17 BH18 BH12
BH15
BH19BH20
BH23
BH13
BH22
BH21
BH16
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX B GUIDELINES
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B1 Health Investigation Levels for Soil Contaminants
Chemical Health-based Investigation Levels (mg/kg)
Residential A 1 Residential B 1 Recreational C 1 Commercial / Industrial D 1
Metals and Inorganics
Arsenic 2 100 500 300 3 000
Beryllium 60 90 90 500
Boron 4500 40 000 20 000 300 000
Cadmium 20 150 90 900
Chromium (VI) 100 500 300 3600
Cobalt 100 600 300 4000
Copper 6000 30 000 17 000 240 000
Lead 3 300 1200 600 1 500
Manganese 3800 14 000 19 000 60 000
Mercury (inorganic)5 40 120 80 730
Methyl mercury4 10 30 13 180
Nickel 400 1200 1200 6 000
Selenium 200 1400 700 10 000
Zinc 7400 60 000 30 000 400 000
Cyanide (free) 250 300 240 1 500
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)6 3 4 3 40
Total PAHs7 300 400 300 4000
1 - HIL A - Residential with garden/accessible soil (home grown produce <10% fruit and vegetable intake (no poultry), also includes childcare centres, preschools and primary schools. - HIL B - Residential with minimal opportunities for soil access; includes dwellings with fully and permanently
paved yard space such as high-rise buildings and apartments.
- HIL C - Public open space such as parks, playgrounds, playing fields (e.g. ovals), secondary schools and
footpaths. This does not include undeveloped public open space where the potential for exposure is lower and
where a site-specific assessment may be more appropriate.
- HIL D - Commercial/industrial, includes premises such as shops, offices, factories and industrial sites.
2 Arsenic: HIL assumes 70% oral bioavailability. Site-specific bioavailability may be important and should be considered where appropriate (refer Schedule B7).
3 Lead: HIL is based on blood lead models (IEUBK for HILs A, B and C and adult lead model for HIL D where 50% oral bioavailability has been considered. Site-specific bioavailability may be important and should be considered where appropriate.
4 Methyl mercury: assessment of methyl mercury should only occur where there is evidence of its potential source. It may be associated with inorganic mercury and anaerobic microorganism activity in aquatic environments. In addition the reliability and quality of sampling/analysis should be considered.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B2 Soil HSLs for vapour intrusion (mg/kg)
CHEMICAL 0 m to <1 m
1 m to <2 m
2 m to <4m
4 m+
0 m to <1 m
1 m to <2 m
2 m to <4 m
4 m+
0 m to <1 m
1 m to <2 m
2 m to <4 m
4 m+
Soil saturation concentration (Csat)
SAND
Toluene 160 220 310 540 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 560
Ethylbenzene 55 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 64
Xylenes 40 60 95 170 NL NL NL NL 230 NL NL NL 300
Naphthalene 3 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 9
Benzene 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 NL NL NL NL 3 3 3 3 360
F19 45 70 110 200 NL NL NL NL 260 370 630 NL 950
F210 110 240 440 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 560
SILT
Toluene 390 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 640
Ethylbenzene NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 69
Xylenes 95 210 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 330
Naphthalene 4 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 10
Benzene 0.6 0.7 1 2 NL NL NL NL 4 4 6 10 440
F19 40 65 100 190 NL NL NL NL 250 360 590 NL 910
F210 230 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 570
CLAY
Toluene 480 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 630
Ethylbenzene NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 68
Xylenes 110 310 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 330
Naphthalene 5 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 10
Benzene 0.7 1 2 3 NL NL NL NL 4 6 9 20 430
F19 50 90 150 290 NL NL NL NL 310 480 NL NL 850
F210 280 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL 560
1 Land use settings are equivalent to those described in Table 1A(1) Footnote 1 and Schedule B7. HSLs for vapour intrusion for high density residential assume residential occupation of the ground floor. If communal car parks or commercial properties occupy the ground floor, HSL D should be used.
2 The key limitations of the HSLs should be referred to prior to application and are presented in Friebel and Nadebaum (2011b and 2011d).
3 Detailed assumptions in the derivation of the HSLs and information on how to apply the HSLs are presented in Friebel and Nadebaum (2011a and 2011b).
4 Soil HSLs for vapour inhalation incorporate an adjustment factor of 10 applied to the vapour phase partitioning to reflect the differences observed between theoretical estimates of soil vapour partitioning and field measurements. Refer Friebel & Nadebaum (2011a) for further information.
5 The soil saturation concentration (Csat) is defined as the soil concentration at which the porewater phase cannot dissolve any more of an individual chemical. The soil vapour that is in equilibrium with the porewater will be at its maximum. If the derived soil HSL exceeds Csat, a soil vapour source concentration for a petroleum mixture could not exceed a level that would result in the maximum allowable vapour risk for the given scenario. For these scenarios, no HSL is presented for these chemicals and the HSL is shown as ‘not limiting’ or ‘NL’.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
6 The HSLs for TPH C6-C10 in sandy soil are based on a finite source that depletes in less than seven years, and therefore consideration has been given to use of sub-chronic toxicity values. The >C8-C10 aliphatic toxicity has been adjusted to represent sub-chronic exposure, resulting in higher HSLs than if based on chronic toxicity. For further information refer to Section 8.2 and Appendix J in Friebel and Nadebaum (2011a).
7 The figures in the above table may be multiplied by a factor to account for biodegradation of vapour. A factor of 10 may apply for source depths from 2 m to <4 m or a factor of 100 for source depths of 4 m and deeper. To apply the attenuation factor for vapour degradation, a number of conditions must be satisfied. Firstly the maximum length of the shorter side of the concrete slab and surrounding pavement cannot exceed 15 m, as this would prevent oxygen penetrating to the centre of the slab. Secondly, measurement of oxygen in the subsurface is required to determine the potential for biodegradation. Oxygen must be confirmed to be present at >5% to use these factors.
8 For soil texture classification undertaken in accord with AS 1726, the classifications of sand, silt and clay may be applied as coarse, fine with liquid limit <50% and fine with liquid limit>50% respectively, as the underlying properties to develop the HSLs may reasonably be selected to be similar. Where there is uncertainty, either a conservative approach may be adopted or laboratory analysis should be carried out.
9 To obtain F1 subtract the sum of BTEX concentrations from the C6-C10 fraction.
10 To obtain F2 subtract naphthalene from the >C10-C16 fraction.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B3 Soil-specific added contaminant limits for aged zinc in soil
Zn added contaminant limits (ACL, mg added contaminant/kg)
pH4 CEC5 (cmol/kg)
Areas of ecological significance
5 10 20 30 40 60
4.0 15 20 20 20 20 20
4.5 20 25 25 25 25 25
5.0 30 40 40 40 40 40
5.5 40 60 60 60 60 60
6.0 50 90 90 90 90 90
6.5 50 90 130 130 130 130
7.0 50 90 150 190 190 190
7.5 50 90 150 210 260 280
Urban residential/public open space1
5 10 20 30 40 60
4.0 70 85 85 85 85 85
4.5 100 120 120 120 120 120
5.0 130 180 180 180 180 180
5.5 180 270 270 270 270 270
6.0 230 400 400 400 400 400
6.5 230 400 590 590 590 590
7.0 230 400 700 880 880 880
7.5 230 400 700 960 1200 1300
Commercial/industrial
5 10 20 30 40 60
4.0 110 130 130 130 130 130
4.5 150 190 190 190 190 190
5.0 210 290 290 290 290 290
5.5 280 420 420 420 420 420
6.0 360 620 620 620 620 620
6.5 360 620 920 920 920 920
7.0 360 620 1100 1400 1400 1400
7.5 360 620 1100 1500 1900 2000
1 Urban residential/public open space is broadly equivalent to the HIL A, HIL B and HIL C land use scenarios in Table B1.
2 Aged values apply to contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.
3 The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ABC. 4 pH measure using the CaCl2 method (Raymond & Higginson 1992).
5 CEC measured using the silver thiourea method (Chabra et al. 1972).
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B4 Soil-specific added contaminant limits for aged copper in soil
Cu added contaminant limits (ACL, mg added contaminant/kg)
Areas of ecological significance
CEC5 (cmol/kg) based
5 10 20 30 40 60
30 65 70 70 75 80
pH4 based
4.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 8.0
20 45 65 90 190 270
Urban residential/public open space1
CEC5 (cmol/kg) based
5 10 20 30 40 60
95 190 210 220 220 230
pH4 based
4.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 8.0
60 130 190 280 560 800
Commercial/industrial
CEC5 (cmol/kg) based
5 10 20 30 40 60
140 280 300 320 330 340
pH4 based
4.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 8.0
85 190 280 400 830 1200
1 Urban residential/public open space is broadly equivalent to the HIL A, HIL B and HIL C land use scenarios in Table B1.
2 Aged values apply to contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.
3 The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ABC.
4 pH measure using the CaCl2 method (Raymond & Higginson 1992).
5 CEC measured using the silver thiourea method (Chabra et al. 1972).
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B5 Soil-specific added contaminant limits for aged chromium III and nickel in soil
CHEMICAL
Clay content (% clay)
Added contaminant limits (mg added contaminant/kg) for various land uses
Areas of ecological
significance
Urban residential/public
open space1
Commercial and industrial
Chromium III
1 60 190 310
2.5 80 250 420
5 100 320 530
≥10 130 400 660
Nickel
CEC4 (cmol/kg)
Areas of ecological
significance
Urban residential/public
open space1
Commercial and industrial
5 5 30 55
10 30 170 290
20 45 270 460
30 60 350 600
40 70 420 730
60 95 560 960
1 Urban residential/public open space is broadly equivalent to the HIL A, HIL B and HIL C land use scenarios in Table B1.
2 Aged values apply to contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.
3 The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ABC.
4 CEC measured using the silver thiourea method (Chabra et al. 1972).
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B6 Generic added contaminant limits for lead in soils irrespective of their physiochemical properties
Pb added contaminant limits (mg added contaminant/kg) for various land uses
CHEMICAL Areas of ecological significance
Urban residential/public open space1
Commercial and industrial
Lead 470 1100 1800
1 Urban residential/public open space is broadly equivalent to the HIL A, HIL B and HIL C land use scenarios in Table B1.
2 Aged values apply to contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.
3 The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ABC.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B7 Generic EIL’s for aged As, fresh DDT and fresh naphthalene in soils irrespective of their physiochemical properties
Ecological Investigation Levels (mg total contaminant/kg)
CHEMICAL Areas of ecological significance
Urban residential/public
open space1
Commercial and industrial
Arsenic2 4 40 100 160
DDT3 3 180 640
Naphthalene3 4 10 170 370
1 Urban residential/public open space is broadly equivalent to the HIL A, HIL B and HIL C land use scenarios in Table B1.
2 Aged values are applicable to arsenic contamination present in soil for at least two years. For fresh contamination refer to Schedule B5c.
3 Insufficient data was available to calculate values for DDT and naphthalene, consequently the values for fresh contamination should be used.
4 Insufficient data was available to calculate ACL’s for As, DDT and naphthalene. The EIL should be taken directly from Table B7
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B8 ESLs for TPH fractions F1-F4, BTEX and benzo(a)pyrene in soil
CHEMICAL
Soil texture
ESLs (mg/kg dry soil)
Areas of ecological
significance
Urban residential/public
open space1
Commercial and industrial
F1 C6 – C10 Coarse/Fine
125* 180* 215*
F2 > C10 – C16 25* 120* 170*
F3 > C16 – C34 Coarse - 300 1700
Fine - 1300 2500
F4 > C34 – C40 Coarse - 2800 3300
Fine - 5600 6600
Benzene Coarse 10 50 75
Fine 10 65 95
Toluene Coarse 10 85 135
Fine 65 105 135
Ethylbenzene Coarse 1.5 70 165
Fine 40 125 185
Xylenes Coarse 10 105 180
Fine 1.6 45 95
Benzo(a)pyrene Coarse 0.7 0.7 1.4
Fine 0.7 0.7 1.4
(1) ESLs are of low reliability except where indicated by * which indicates that the ESL is of moderate reliability.
(2) “ – “ indicates that insufficient data was available to derive a value.
(3) To obtain F1, subtract the sum of BTEX concentrations from C6 – C10 fraction and subtract naphthalene >C10 – C16 to obtain F2.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Table B9 Management Limits for TPH fractions F1-F4 in soil
TPH Fraction Soil texture Management Limits1 (mg/kg dry soil)
Residential, parkland and public open
space
Commercial and industrial
F12 C6 – C10
Coarse 700 700
Fine 800 800
F22 > C10 – C16 Coarse 1000 1000
Fine 1000 1000
F3 > C16 – C34 Coarse 2500 3500
Fine 3500 5000
F4 > C34 – C40 Coarse 10 000 10 000
Fine 10 000 10 000
1 Management Limits are applied after consideration of relevant ESLs and HSLs.
2 Separate management limits for BTEX and naphthalene are not available hence these should not be subtracted from the relevant fractions to obtain F1 and F2.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX C LABORATORY RESULTS SUMMARY AND TRANSCIPTS
Project Number: 364678Site: 112‐120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWClient: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited‐trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial
Table C1 ‐ Summary of Soil Results ‐ Commercial/Industrial
Inorganics Solvents Phenols
Moisture
Arsenic
Cadm
ium
Chromium (III+
VI)
Copp
er
Lead
Mercury
Nicke
l
Zinc
Benzen
e
Toluen
e
Ethy
lben
zene
Xylene
Total
Cycloh
exan
e
Phen
olics To
tal
C6‐C10
C6‐C10
(F1 minus
BTEX
)
C10‐C1
6
C10‐C1
6 (F2 minus
Nap
htha
lene
)
C16‐C3
4
C34‐C4
0
C10‐C4
0 (Sum
of
total)
% mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgEQL 0.1 4 0.4 1 1 1 0.1 1 1 0.2 0.5 1 3 1 5 25 25 50 50 100 100 50CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / Industrial 430 99,000 27,000 81,000 26,000 20,000 27,000 38,000NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil 700 1,000 3,500 10,000 NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 3 NL NL 230 260 NL 1‐2m 3 NL NL NL 370 NL 2‐4m 3 NL NL NL 630 NL NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) 160 310 140 1,800 55 360 NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2m 75 135 165 180 215 170 1,700 3,330NEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil 3,000 900 240,000 1,500 730 6,000 400,000
Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2 4.2 4 <0.4 17 37 55 0.1 10 92 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 3.0 <4 <0.4 3 10 9 <0.1 1 65 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7 1.2 <4 <0.4 1 <1 1 <0.1 <1 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 1.2 <4 <0.4 1 <1 1 <0.1 <1 2 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7 3.8 <4 <0.4 2 4 18 <0.1 1 95 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 8.6 <4 <0.4 5 4 15 <0.1 3 16 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 13 4 <0.4 9 27 93 0.6 4 180 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 5.4 <4 <0.4 7 15 19 <0.1 5 31 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 2.7 <4 <0.4 1 4 2 <0.1 <1 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 14 6 0.4 15 65 91 0.2 7 130 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 120 <100 120BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 13 <4 <0.4 8 15 28 <0.1 4 43 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 3.7 <4 <0.4 5 17 38 <0.1 33 33 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2 7.9 4 1 22 43 110 0.2 15 140 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 4.7 <4 <0.4 <1 <1 1 <0.1 <1 1 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 3.9 <4 <0.4 11 4 15 <0.1 4 20 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 4.8 <4 <0.4 3 3 2 <0.1 2 7 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 7.6 <4 <0.4 4 4 12 <0.1 2 16 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 5.4 <4 <0.4 2 2 10 <0.1 1 11 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 8.2 <4 <0.4 22 57 49 <0.1 20 130 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 5.0 <4 <0.4 30 58 55 <0.1 30 130 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 9.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 11 5 <0.4 9 60 66 0.1 6 90 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 10 8 1 110 120 120 2.1 12 700 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 240 <100 240BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2 5.1 8 <0.4 62 39 48 <0.1 49 66 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 4.7 <4 <0.4 5 1 2 <0.1 4 6 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 330 <100 330BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 21 <4 <0.4 11 13 42 0.3 4 54 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 7.2 <4 <0.4 4 3 13 <0.1 2 14 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 9.6 6 <0.4 4 15 44 0.1 3 77 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 280 110 390BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4 5.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.5 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8 5.0 <4 <0.4 4 3 8 <0.1 1 35 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 7.7 <4 <0.4 4 4 12 <0.1 2 15 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 22 14 0.5 12 170 300 0.3 18 270 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 100 <100 100BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 4.2 <4 <0.4 3 14 35 <0.1 2 50 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 7.2 <4 <0.4 4 34 24 <0.1 2 24 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 200 <100 200BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 5.9 <4 <0.4 4 10 22 <0.1 3 34 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 6.6 <4 <0.4 4 6 14 <0.1 1 14 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 <1 ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3 7.7 <4 <0.4 16 50 94 <0.1 19 120 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ <5 <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6 6.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.5 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 1.5 <4 <0.4 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <1 1 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 3.8 <4 <0.4 <1 <1 2 <0.1 <1 1 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 <100 <100 <50QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1 13 <4 <0.4 5 15 73 0.3 3 67 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <3 ‐ ‐ <25 <25 <50 <50 190 <100 190
Environmental StandardsCRC Care, 2011, CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM, 2013, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA)
Metals BTEX TRH
Page 1 of 5
Project Number: 364678Site: 112‐120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWClient: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited‐trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial
Table C1 ‐ Summary of Soil Results ‐ Commercial/Industrial
EQLCRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 1‐2m 2‐4mNEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2mNEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil
Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1
Environmental StandardsCRC Care, 2011, CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM, 2013, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA)
1,1,1,2‐
tetrachloroe
than
e
1,1,1‐trichloroe
than
e
1,1,2,2‐
tetrachloroe
than
e
1,1,2‐trichloroe
than
e
1,1‐dichloroetha
ne
1,1‐dichloroethe
ne
1,1‐dichloroprop
ene
1,2,3‐
trichlorop
ropa
ne
1,2‐dibrom
o‐3‐
chloroprop
ane
1,2‐dichloroetha
ne
1,2‐dichloroprop
ane
1,3‐dichloroprop
ane
2,2‐dichloroprop
ane
Brom
ochlorom
etha
ne Brom
odichlorom
etha
ne Brom
oform
Carbon
tetrachloride
Chlorodibrom
ometha
ne Chloroetha
ne
Chloroform
Chlorometha
ne
cis‐1,2‐
dichloroethe
ne
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Page 2 of 5
Project Number: 364678Site: 112‐120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWClient: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited‐trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial
Table C1 ‐ Summary of Soil Results ‐ Commercial/Industrial
EQLCRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 1‐2m 2‐4mNEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2mNEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil
Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1
Environmental StandardsCRC Care, 2011, CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM, 2013, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA)
cis‐1,3‐
dichloroprop
ene
Dibromom
etha
ne
Hexachlorob
utad
iene
Trichloroe
then
e
Tetrachloroe
then
e
tran
s‐1,2‐
dichloroethe
ne
tran
s‐1,3‐
dichloroprop
ene
Viny
l chloride
1,2,3‐
trichlorob
enzene
1,2,4‐
trichlorob
enzene
1,2‐dichlorobe
nzen
e
1,3‐dichlorobe
nzen
e
1,4‐dichlorobe
nzen
e
2‐chlorotoluen
e
4‐chlorotoluen
e
Brom
oben
zene
Chlorobe
nzen
e
1,2‐dibrom
oethan
e
Brom
ometha
ne
Dichlorod
ifluo
rometh
ane
Trichlorofluorom
etha
ne 1,2,4‐
trim
ethy
lben
zene
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Halogenated HydrocarbonsHalogenated Benzenes
Page 3 of 5
Project Number: 364678Site: 112‐120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWClient: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited‐trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial
Table C1 ‐ Summary of Soil Results ‐ Commercial/Industrial
EQLCRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 1‐2m 2‐4mNEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2mNEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil
Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1
Environmental StandardsCRC Care, 2011, CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM, 2013, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA)
1,3,5‐
trim
ethy
lben
zene
Isop
ropy
lben
zene
n‐bu
tylben
zene
n‐prop
ylbe
nzen
e
p‐isop
ropy
ltoluen
e
sec‐bu
tylben
zene
Styren
e
tert‐butylbe
nzen
e
Benzo(b+
j+k)flu
oran
the
ne
Acen
aphthe
ne
Acen
aphthy
lene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracen
e
Benzo(a) pyren
e
Benzo(g,h,i)p
erylen
e
Chrysene
Diben
z(a,h)an
thracen
e Fluo
ranthe
ne
Fluo
rene
Inde
no(1,2,3‐
c,d)py
rene
Nap
htha
lene
Phen
anthrene
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
11,000
NL NL NL 370
1.4
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.07 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.08 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.73 0.5 0.7 <0.1 1.4 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.7‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 <0.1 1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.5 <0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.6‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 <0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.63 0.4 0.7 <0.1 1.6 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 1.0‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.08 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 <0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 2.2 0.6 2.1 0.1 4.0 1.4 0.5 <1 2.7‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 <0.1 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.65 0.4 0.6 <0.1 1.8 0.1 0.3 <0.1 1.6‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.5 <0.1 0.6 0.8 3.9 4.5 3.2 3.4 0.6 6.8 0.2 2.4 0.3 2.0<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.06 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.4 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.08 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 <0.1 0.6 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.3<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.8 <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.5
MAH PAH
Page 4 of 5
Project Number: 364678Site: 112‐120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWClient: Lend Lease Funds Management Limited‐trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial
Table C1 ‐ Summary of Soil Results ‐ Commercial/Industrial
EQLCRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM 2013 Table 1A(3) Comm/Ind D Soil HSL for Vapour Intrusion, Sand, 0‐1m 1‐2m 2‐4mNEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA) NEPM 2013 Table 1B(6) ESLs for Comm/Ind, Coarse Soil, 0‐2mNEPM 2013 Table 1A(1) HILs Comm/Ind D Soil
Field ID Date DepthBH01_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH01_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH02_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH03_0.6‐0.7 12/08/2019 0.6 ‐ 0.7BH04_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH04_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH05_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH05_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH06_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH06_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH06_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH07_0.1‐0.2 12/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH07_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH08_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH09_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH10_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH11_0.3‐0.4 12/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH12_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.2‐0.3 12/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH13_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH14_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH15_0.5‐0.6 12/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH16_0.1‐0.2 13/08/2019 0.1 ‐ 0.2BH16_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH17_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH18_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH18_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH19_0.3‐0.4 13/08/2019 0.3 ‐ 0.4BH19_0.7‐0.8 13/08/2019 0.7 ‐ 0.8BH20_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH20_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH21_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH21_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1BH22_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH22_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6BH23_0.2‐0.3 13/08/2019 0.2 ‐ 0.3BH23_0.5‐0.6 13/08/2019 0.5 ‐ 0.6QC01_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC02_1.0‐1.1 12/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1QC04_1.0‐1.1 13/08/2019 1 ‐ 1.1
Environmental StandardsCRC Care, 2011, CRC Care HSL‐D Commercial / IndustrialNEPM, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(7) Management Limits Comm / Ind, Coarse Soil NEPM, 2013, NEPM 2013 Table 1B(5) Generic EIL ‐ Comm/Ind (KPMG SGA)
Pyrene
Benzo(a)py
rene
TEQ
(LOR)
PAHs (Sum
of
positiv
es)
Arochlor 101
6
Arochlor 122
1
Arochlor 123
2
Arochlor 124
2
Arochlor 124
8
Arochlor 125
4
Arochlor 126
0
PCBs (S
um of total)
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
40 4,000 7
0.1 <0.5 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 <0.5 0.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.2 <0.5 0.56 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.4 1.1 8.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.9 0.6 4.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.8 0.5 4.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.6 1 8.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.6 0.5 3.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 <0.5 0.65 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.4 <0.5 1.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.5 <0.5 2.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐3.7 2.7 22 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.7 1 9.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.17.5 6.4 43 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.3 <0.5 1.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.4 <0.5 2.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.1 <0.5 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.4 <0.5 2.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.6 0.5 3.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.2 <0.5 0.51 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.8 0.5 3.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.3 <0.5 1.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<0.1 <0.5 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐0.8 0.6 4.9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
PCBs
Page 5 of 5
Envirolab Services Pty Ltd
ABN 37 112 535 645
12 Ashley St Chatswood NSW 2067
ph 02 9910 6200 fax 02 9910 6201
www.envirolab.com.au
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 223889
Tower 3, International Towers Sydney, 300 Barangaroo Ave, Sydney, NSW, 2000Address
Martin LeongAttention
KPMG SGAClient
Client Details
14/08/2019Date completed instructions received
14/08/2019Date samples received
88 soil, 3 waterNumber of Samples
364678Your Reference
Sample Details
Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.
Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.
Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.
Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.
Analysis Details
Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing.
NATA Accreditation Number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.
This report replaces R00 created on 20/08/2019 due to: Project ID Amended (ClientRequest)
Reissue Details
20/08/2019Date of Issue
20/08/2019Date results requested by
Report Details
Nancy Zhang, Laboratory Manager
Authorised By
Steven Luong, Organics Supervisor
Jaimie Loa-Kum-Cheung, Metals Supervisor
Diego Bigolin, Team Leader, Inorganics
Results Approved By
Revision No: R01
223889Envirolab Reference: Page | 1 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtetrachloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromochloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromodichloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromomethane
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgCyclohexane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg2,2-dichloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchloroform
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromochloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgBromomethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgVinyl Chloride
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.3-0.40.5-0.60.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.2Depth
BH11_0.3-0.4BH06_0.5-0.6BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_0.3-0.4BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-36223889-21223889-16223889-12223889-1Our Reference
VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 2 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
10710410897100%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene
99100989998%Surrogate Toluene-d8
631067483109%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
100101100100100%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kghexachlorobutadiene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-butyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,4-dichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgsec-butyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtert-butyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-chlorotoluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg2-chlorotoluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-propyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgisopropylbenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgstyrene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromoform
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.3-0.40.5-0.60.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.2Depth
BH11_0.3-0.4BH06_0.5-0.6BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_0.3-0.4BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-36223889-21223889-16223889-12223889-1Our Reference
VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 3 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtetrachloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromochloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromodichloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgdibromomethane
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgCyclohexane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg2,2-dichloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgchloroform
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromochloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgBromomethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgVinyl Chloride
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgChloromethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.3-0.40.5-0.60.5-0.60.2-0.3Depth
BH21_0.2-0.3BH19_0.3-0.4BH17_0.5-0.6BH13_0.5-0.6BH12_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-73223889-65223889-59223889-44223889-39Our Reference
VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 4 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
10610610310299%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene
10099100100100%Surrogate Toluene-d8
921101048374%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
103102103101103%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kghexachlorobutadiene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-butyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,4-dichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgsec-butyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichlorobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgtert-butyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg4-chlorotoluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg2-chlorotoluene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgn-propyl benzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromobenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgisopropylbenzene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgstyrene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgbromoform
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.3-0.40.5-0.60.5-0.60.2-0.3Depth
BH21_0.2-0.3BH19_0.3-0.4BH17_0.5-0.6BH13_0.5-0.6BH12_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-73223889-65223889-59223889-44223889-39Our Reference
VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 5 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
<1<1mg/kgchlorobenzene
<1<1mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
<1<1mg/kgtetrachloroethene
<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane
<1<1mg/kgdibromochloromethane
<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane
<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<1<1mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane
<1<1mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene
<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene
<1<1mg/kgbromodichloromethane
<1<1mg/kgtrichloroethene
<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloropropane
<1<1mg/kgdibromomethane
<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<1<1mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride
<1<1mg/kgCyclohexane
<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene
<1<1mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane
<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane
<1<1mg/kg2,2-dichloropropane
<1<1mg/kgchloroform
<1<1mg/kgbromochloromethane
<1<1mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene
<1<1mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane
<1<1mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene
<1<1mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene
<1<1mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane
<1<1mg/kgChloroethane
<1<1mg/kgBromomethane
<1<1mg/kgVinyl Chloride
<1<1mg/kgChloromethane
<1<1mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane
17/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH23_0.5-0.6BH22_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-81223889-78Our Reference
VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 6 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
100103%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene
100100%Surrogate Toluene-d8
10761%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
100103%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha
<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
<1<1mg/kghexachlorobutadiene
<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
<1<1mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
<1<1mg/kgn-butyl benzene
<1<1mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene
<1<1mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene
<1<1mg/kg1,4-dichlorobenzene
<1<1mg/kgsec-butyl benzene
<1<1mg/kg1,3-dichlorobenzene
<1<1mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
<1<1mg/kgtert-butyl benzene
<1<1mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
<1<1mg/kg4-chlorotoluene
<1<1mg/kg2-chlorotoluene
<1<1mg/kgn-propyl benzene
<1<1mg/kgbromobenzene
<1<1mg/kgisopropylbenzene
<1<1mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane
<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<1<1mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
<1<1mg/kgstyrene
<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1mg/kgbromoform
<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
soilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH23_0.5-0.6BH22_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-81223889-78Our Reference
VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 7 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
1071077410383%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_1.0-1.1BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_1.0-1.1BH04_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
11189107114109%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth
BH03_0.6-0.7BH02_1.0-1.1BH02_0.6-0.7BH01_1.0-1.1BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 8 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
1057463115107%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth
BH13_0.2-0.3BH12_0.2-0.3BH11_0.3-0.4BH10_0.3-0.4BH09_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
7310997114106%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth
BH08_0.5-0.6BH07_1.0-1.1BH07_0.1-0.2BH06_1.0-1.1BH06_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 9 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
1091097079109%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH20_1.0-1.1BH20_0.2-0.3BH19_0.7-0.8BH18_1.0-1.1BH18_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
1041111169983%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH17_0.5-0.6BH16_1.0-1.1BH16_0.1-0.2BH15_0.5-0.6BH14_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 10 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
102107107%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth
QC04_1.0-1.1QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference
223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
1136110311692%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
<3<3<3<3<3mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgnaphthalene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgo-Xylene
<2<2<2<2<2mg/kgm+p-xylene
<1<1<1<1<1mg/kgEthylbenzene
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgToluene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzene
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
<25<25<25<25<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth
BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.5-0.6BH22_0.2-0.3BH21_1.0-1.1BH21_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 11 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
8179818888%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
120<50<50<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
120<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_1.0-1.1BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_1.0-1.1BH04_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
80888211889%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth
BH03_0.6-0.7BH02_1.0-1.1BH02_0.6-0.7BH01_1.0-1.1BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 12 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
9180907880%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth
BH13_0.2-0.3BH12_0.2-0.3BH11_0.3-0.4BH10_0.3-0.4BH09_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
8086799379%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth
BH08_0.5-0.6BH07_1.0-1.1BH07_0.1-0.2BH06_1.0-1.1BH06_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 13 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
8278879287%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
100<50<50390<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100110<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
100<100<100280<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100<100<100180<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100<100<100140<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH20_1.0-1.1BH20_0.2-0.3BH19_0.7-0.8BH18_1.0-1.1BH18_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
7985858284%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
<50330<50240<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
<100330<100240<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100190<100180<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100190<100130<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH17_0.5-0.6BH16_1.0-1.1BH16_0.1-0.2BH15_0.5-0.6BH14_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 14 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
897990%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
190<50<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
190<100<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
120<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
100<100<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth
QC04_1.0-1.1QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference
223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
8889819480%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
<50<50<50200<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
<100<100<100200<100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
<100<100<100<100<100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
<100<100<100120<100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
<50<50<50<50<50mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth
BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.5-0.6BH22_0.2-0.3BH21_1.0-1.1BH21_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 15 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
8997999691%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
0.2<0.05<0.05<0.050.3mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.050.07mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1mg/kgPyrene
0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth
BH03_0.6-0.7BH02_1.0-1.1BH02_0.6-0.7BH01_1.0-1.1BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 16 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
9799979398%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
0.6<0.51.1<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
0.5<0.51.0<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.5<0.51<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
4.6<0.058.10.560.3mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
0.3<0.10.5<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.2<0.10.4<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
0.4<0.050.730.080.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
0.7<0.21<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
0.4<0.10.70.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene
0.4<0.10.7<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.9<0.11.40.20.1mg/kgPyrene
1<0.11.40.20.1mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.1<0.10.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
0.4<0.10.7<0.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.1<0.10.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_1.0-1.1BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_1.0-1.1BH04_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 17 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
979710310085%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
<0.5<0.50.510.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
<0.5<0.5<0.50.9<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.5<0.5<0.50.9<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
<0.05<0.053.48.44.5mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
<0.1<0.10.30.40.2mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<0.1<0.10.20.30.2mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
<0.05<0.050.30.630.3mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
<0.2<0.20.710.5mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
<0.1<0.10.30.70.4mg/kgChrysene
<0.1<0.10.40.80.4mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
<0.1<0.10.61.60.8mg/kgPyrene
<0.1<0.10.61.60.8mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.1<0.1<0.10.30.2mg/kgAnthracene
<0.1<0.10.11.00.6mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.1<0.1<0.10.20.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth
BH08_0.5-0.6BH07_1.0-1.1BH07_0.1-0.2BH06_1.0-1.1BH06_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 18 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
9794979696%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
1.80.3<0.050.65<0.05mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
0.20.05<0.050.08<0.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
0.3<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
0.2<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene
0.2<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.40.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgPyrene
0.40.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
0.2<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth
BH13_0.2-0.3BH12_0.2-0.3BH11_0.3-0.4BH10_0.3-0.4BH09_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 19 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
10299969492%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
<0.56.412.7<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
<0.56.40.92.7<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.56.40.92.7<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
1.7439.8222.6mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
0.23.20.40.60.2mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.10.6<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.12.40.30.50.2mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
0.24.50.652.20.2mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
0.36.5120.5mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
0.13.40.62.10.2mg/kgChrysene
0.23.90.81.20.2mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.37.51.73.70.5mg/kgPyrene
0.36.81.84.00.4mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.10.80.40.4<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
0.12.01.62.70.2mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.10.20.11.4<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.10.60.30.2<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.10.3<0.11.4<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH17_0.5-0.6BH16_1.0-1.1BH16_0.1-0.2BH15_0.5-0.6BH14_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 20 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
102969910196%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
2.40.3<0.052.40.3mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
0.1<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.1<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
0.20.06<0.050.20.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
0.4<0.2<0.20.4<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
0.2<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgChrysene
0.2<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.40.1<0.10.40.1mg/kgPyrene
0.40.1<0.10.40.1mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
0.2<0.1<0.10.2<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH20_1.0-1.1BH20_0.2-0.3BH19_0.7-0.8BH18_1.0-1.1BH18_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 21 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
931089510193%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
<0.5<0.50.5<0.50.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
1.4<0.053.60.513.4mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
0.1<0.10.2<0.10.3mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<0.1<0.10.2<0.10.2mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
0.1<0.050.30.080.3mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
0.2<0.20.5<0.20.6mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
0.1<0.10.4<0.10.3mg/kgChrysene
0.1<0.10.3<0.10.3mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.3<0.10.80.20.6mg/kgPyrene
0.3<0.10.60.20.6mg/kgFluoranthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
0.2<0.10.30.10.2mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth
BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.5-0.6BH22_0.2-0.3BH21_1.0-1.1BH21_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 22 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
989299%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
0.6<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)
0.6<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)
0.5<0.5<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)
4.9<0.05<0.05mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's
0.3<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
0.4<0.05<0.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
0.8<0.2<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
0.4<0.1<0.1mg/kgChrysene
0.4<0.1<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
0.8<0.1<0.1mg/kgPyrene
0.8<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluoranthene
0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAnthracene
0.5<0.1<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgFluorene
<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth
QC04_1.0-1.1QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference
223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference
PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 23 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
8686868586%Surrogate TCMX
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve PCBs (1016-1260)
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1260
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1254
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1248
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1242
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1232
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1221
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1016
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.20.2-0.3Depth
BH21_0.2-0.3BH20_0.2-0.3BH18_0.3-0.4BH16_0.1-0.2BH13_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-73223889-69223889-61223889-54223889-43Our Reference
PCBs in Soil
8686879491%Surrogate TCMX
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve PCBs (1016-1260)
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1260
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1254
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1248
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1242
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1232
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1221
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1016
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.60.2-0.30.2-0.30.6-0.70.1-0.2Depth
BH09_0.5-0.6BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_0.2-0.3BH03_0.6-0.7BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-31223889-20223889-16223889-9223889-1Our Reference
PCBs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 24 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
8787%Surrogate TCMX
<0.1<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve PCBs (1016-1260)
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1260
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1254
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1248
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1242
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1232
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1221
<0.1<0.1mg/kgAroclor 1016
16/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
soilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.3Depth
BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-80223889-77Our Reference
PCBs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 25 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
13043118016mg/kgZinc
7<1543mg/kgNickel
0.2<0.1<0.10.6<0.1mg/kgMercury
912199315mg/kgLead
65415274mg/kgCopper
151795mg/kgChromium
0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
6<4<44<4mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_1.0-1.1BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_1.0-1.1BH04_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
95236592mg/kgZinc
1<1<1110mg/kgNickel
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1mg/kgMercury
1811955mg/kgLead
4<1<11037mg/kgCopper
211317mg/kgChromium
<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
<4<4<4<44mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth
BH03_0.6-0.7BH02_1.0-1.1BH02_0.6-0.7BH01_1.0-1.1BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 26 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
13013011167mg/kgZinc
3020122mg/kgNickel
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury
554910122mg/kgLead
5857243mg/kgCopper
3022243mg/kgChromium
<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
<4<4<4<4<4mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth
BH13_0.2-0.3BH12_0.2-0.3BH11_0.3-0.4BH10_0.3-0.4BH09_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
2011403343mg/kgZinc
4<115334mg/kgNickel
<0.1<0.10.2<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury
1511103828mg/kgLead
4<1431715mg/kgCopper
11<12258mg/kgChromium
<0.4<0.41<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
<4<44<4<4mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth
BH08_0.5-0.6BH07_1.0-1.1BH07_0.1-0.2BH06_1.0-1.1BH06_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 27 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
27015357714mg/kgZinc
182132mg/kgNickel
0.3<0.1<0.10.1<0.1mg/kgMercury
3001284413mg/kgLead
17043153mg/kgCopper
124444mg/kgChromium
0.5<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
14<4<46<4mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.10.2-0.30.7-0.81.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH20_1.0-1.1BH20_0.2-0.3BH19_0.7-0.8BH18_1.0-1.1BH18_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-71223889-69223889-66223889-63223889-61Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
5466670090mg/kgZinc
4449126mg/kgNickel
0.3<0.1<0.12.10.1mg/kgMercury
4224812066mg/kgLead
1313912060mg/kgCopper
115621109mg/kgChromium
<0.4<0.4<0.41<0.4mg/kgCadmium
<4<4885mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH17_0.5-0.6BH16_1.0-1.1BH16_0.1-0.2BH15_0.5-0.6BH14_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-59223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 28 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
766711mg/kgZinc
103<1<1mg/kgNickel
<0.10.3<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury
46732<1mg/kgLead
3315<1<1mg/kgCopper
155<1<1mg/kgChromium
<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
<4<4<4<4mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.1-0.21.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth
BH01_0.1-0.2 - [TRIPLICATE]
QC04_1.0-1.1QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference
223889-92223889-86223889-84223889-83Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
12014342450mg/kgZinc
191322mg/kgNickel
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1mg/kgMercury
9414222435mg/kgLead
506103414mg/kgCopper
164443mg/kgChromium
<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4<0.4mg/kgCadmium
<4<4<4<4<4mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.5-0.60.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth
BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.5-0.6BH22_0.2-0.3BH21_1.0-1.1BH21_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-80223889-78223889-77223889-75223889-73Our Reference
Acid Extractable metals in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 29 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
<5<5mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)
15/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.3Depth
BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-80223889-77Our Reference
Misc Soil - Inorg
<5<5<5<5<5mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.1-0.20.2-0.3Depth
BH21_0.2-0.3BH20_0.2-0.3BH18_0.3-0.4BH16_0.1-0.2BH13_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-73223889-69223889-61223889-54223889-43Our Reference
Misc Soil - Inorg
<5<5<5<5<5mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201912.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.60.2-0.30.2-0.30.6-0.70.1-0.2Depth
BH09_0.5-0.6BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_0.2-0.3BH03_0.6-0.7BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-31223889-20223889-16223889-9223889-1Our Reference
Misc Soil - Inorg
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 30 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
5.08.25.47.64.8%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.30.2-0.30.3-0.40.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth
BH13_0.2-0.3BH12_0.2-0.3BH11_0.3-0.4BH10_0.3-0.4BH09_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-43223889-39223889-36223889-34223889-31Our Reference
Moisture
3.94.77.93.713%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.5-0.61.0-1.10.1-0.21.0-1.10.5-0.6Depth
BH08_0.5-0.6BH07_1.0-1.1BH07_0.1-0.2BH06_1.0-1.1BH06_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-29223889-26223889-24223889-22223889-21Our Reference
Moisture
142.75.4138.6%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201913.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.3-0.4Depth
BH06_0.2-0.3BH05_1.0-1.1BH05_0.2-0.3BH04_1.0-1.1BH04_0.3-0.4UNITSYour Reference
223889-20223889-18223889-16223889-14223889-12Our Reference
Moisture
3.81.21.23.04.2%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.6-0.71.0-1.10.6-0.71.0-1.10.1-0.2Depth
BH03_0.6-0.7BH02_1.0-1.1BH02_0.6-0.7BH01_1.0-1.1BH01_0.1-0.2UNITSYour Reference
223889-9223889-7223889-6223889-3223889-1Our Reference
Moisture
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 31 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
3.81.56.37.76.6%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
12.08.201912.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.11.0-1.10.5-0.60.2-0.30.5-0.6Depth
QC02_1.0-1.1QC01_1.0-1.1BH23_0.5-0.6BH23_0.2-0.3BH22_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-84223889-83223889-81223889-80223889-78Our Reference
Moisture
5.97.24.2227.7%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.31.0-1.10.2-0.3Depth
BH22_0.2-0.3BH21_1.0-1.1BH21_0.2-0.3BH20_1.0-1.1BH20_0.2-0.3UNITSYour Reference
223889-77223889-75223889-73223889-71223889-69Our Reference
Moisture
5.05.59.67.221%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
0.7-0.80.3-0.41.0-1.10.3-0.40.5-0.6Depth
BH19_0.7-0.8BH19_0.3-0.4BH18_1.0-1.1BH18_0.3-0.4BH17_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-66223889-65223889-63223889-61223889-59Our Reference
Moisture
4.75.110119.5%Moisture
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date prepared
soilsoilsoilsoilsoilType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201912.08.201912.08.201912.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.10.1-0.20.5-0.60.5-0.60.5-0.6Depth
BH16_1.0-1.1BH16_0.1-0.2BH15_0.5-0.6BH14_0.5-0.6BH13_0.5-0.6UNITSYour Reference
223889-56223889-54223889-51223889-48223889-44Our Reference
Moisture
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 32 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
13%Moisture
16/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/2019-Date prepared
soilType of sample
13.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.1Depth
QC04_1.0-1.1UNITSYour Reference
223889-86Our Reference
Moisture
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 33 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
<1µg/LChlorobenzene
<1µg/L1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
<1µg/LTetrachloroethene
<1µg/L1,2-dibromoethane
<1µg/LDibromochloromethane
<1µg/L1,3-dichloropropane
<1µg/LToluene
<1µg/L1,1,2-trichloroethane
<1µg/Lcis-1,3-dichloropropene
<1µg/Ltrans-1,3-dichloropropene
<1µg/LBromodichloromethane
<1µg/LTrichloroethene
<1µg/L1,2-dichloropropane
<1µg/LDibromomethane
<1µg/LBenzene
<1µg/LCarbon tetrachloride
<1µg/LCyclohexane
<1µg/L1,1-dichloropropene
<1µg/L1,1,1-trichloroethane
<1µg/L1,2-dichloroethane
<1µg/L2,2-dichloropropane
<1µg/LChloroform
<1µg/LBromochloromethane
<1µg/LCis-1,2-dichloroethene
<1µg/L1,1-dichloroethane
<1µg/LTrans-1,2-dichloroethene
<1µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene
<10µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane
<10µg/LChloroethane
<10µg/LBromomethane
<10µg/LVinyl Chloride
<10µg/LChloromethane
<10µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane
16/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/2019-Date extracted
waterType of sample
13.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.1Depth
Trip BlankUNITSYour Reference
223889-90Our Reference
VOCs in water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 34 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
99%Surrogate 4-BFB
96%Surrogate toluene-d8
103%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane
<1µg/L1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
<1µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
<1µg/L1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
<1µg/L1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
<1µg/Ln-butyl benzene
<1µg/L1,2-dichlorobenzene
<1µg/L4-isopropyl toluene
<1µg/L1,4-dichlorobenzene
<1µg/LSec-butyl benzene
<1µg/L1,3-dichlorobenzene
<1µg/L1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
<1µg/LTert-butyl benzene
<1µg/L1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
<1µg/L4-chlorotoluene
<1µg/L2-chlorotoluene
<1µg/Ln-propyl benzene
<1µg/LBromobenzene
<1µg/LIsopropylbenzene
<1µg/L1,2,3-trichloropropane
<1µg/Lo-xylene
<1µg/L1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
<1µg/LStyrene
<2µg/Lm+p-xylene
<1µg/LBromoform
<1µg/LEthylbenzene
waterType of sample
13.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.1Depth
Trip BlankUNITSYour Reference
223889-90Our Reference
VOCs in water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 35 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
9899101%Surrogate 4-BFB
999699%Surrogate toluene-d8
105103109%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane
[NA][NA]<1µg/LNaphthalene
110%[NA]<1µg/Lo-xylene
106%[NA]<2µg/Lm+p-xylene
109%[NA]<1µg/LEthylbenzene
113%[NA]<1µg/LToluene
120%[NA]<1µg/LBenzene
[NA][NA]<10µg/LTRH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)
[NA]<10<10µg/LTRH C6 - C10
[NA]<10<10µg/LTRH C6 - C9
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019-Date extracted
waterwaterwaterType of sample
13.08.201913.08.201913.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.11.0-1.11.0-1.1Depth
Trip SpikeTrip BlankRB01UNITSYour Reference
223889-91223889-90223889-89Our Reference
vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 36 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
85%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
<100µg/LTRH >C34 - C40
<100µg/LTRH >C16 - C34
99µg/LTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)
99µg/LTRH >C10 - C16
<100µg/LTRH C29 - C36
<100µg/LTRH C15 - C28
<50µg/LTRH C10 - C14
15/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/2019-Date extracted
waterType of sample
13.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.1Depth
RB01UNITSYour Reference
223889-89Our Reference
svTRH (C10-C40) in Water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 37 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
120%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
NIL (+)VEµg/LTotal +ve PAH's
<5µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ
<1µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
<1µg/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<1µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
<1µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene
<2µg/LBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
<1µg/LChrysene
<1µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene
<1µg/LPyrene
<1µg/LFluoranthene
<1µg/LAnthracene
<1µg/LPhenanthrene
<1µg/LFluorene
<1µg/LAcenaphthene
<1µg/LAcenaphthylene
<1µg/LNaphthalene
16/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/2019-Date extracted
waterType of sample
13.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.1Depth
RB01UNITSYour Reference
223889-89Our Reference
PAHs in Water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 38 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
<0.02mg/LZinc - Dissolved
<0.02mg/LNickel - Dissolved
<0.0005mg/LMercury - Dissolved
<0.03mg/LLead - Dissolved
<0.01mg/LCopper - Dissolved
<0.01mg/LChromium - Dissolved
<0.01mg/LCadmium - Dissolved
<0.05mg/LArsenic - Dissolved
15/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/2019-Date digested
waterType of sample
13.08.2019Date Sampled
1.0-1.1Depth
RB01UNITSYour Reference
223889-89Our Reference
Metals in Water - Dissolved
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 39 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS. Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater - 2013.
Org-012
Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC-ECD. Note, the Total +ve PCBs PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore" Total +ve PCBs" is simply a sum of the positive individual PCBs.
Org-006
Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC-ECD.Org-006
Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis. Note, the Total +ve TRH PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve TRH" is simply a sum of the positive individual TRH fractions (>C10-C40).
Org-003
Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.
Org-003
Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS. Metals-021
Determination of various metals by ICP-AES. Metals-020
Total Phenolics by segmented flow analyser (in line distillation with colourimetric finish). Solids are extracted in a caustic media prior to analysis.
Inorg-031
Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.
Inorg-008
Methodology SummaryMethod ID
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 40 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater. Note, the Total +ve Xylene PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve Xylenes" is simply a sum of the positive individual Xylenes.
Org-016
Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.
Org-016
Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Org-014
Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS.Org-013
Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS. Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater - 2013. For soil results:- 1. ‘EQ PQL’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are actually at the PQL. This is the most conservative approach and can give false positive TEQs given that PAHs that contribute to the TEQ calculation may not be present. 2. ‘EQ zero’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are zero. This is the least conservative approach and is more susceptible to false negative TEQs when PAHs that contribute to the TEQ calculation are present but below PQL. 3. ‘EQ half PQL’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are half the stipulated PQL. Hence a mid-point between the most and least conservative approaches above. Note, the Total +ve PAHs PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve PAHs" is simply a sum of the positive individual PAHs.
Org-012
Methodology SummaryMethod ID
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 41 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgstyrene
[NT][NT]0<2<21<2Org-0142mg/kgm+p-xylene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromoform
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgEthylbenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgchlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
62630<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtetrachloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane
79800<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgdibromochloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<0.5<0.51<0.5Org-0140.5mg/kgToluene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene
74750<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromodichloromethane
72800<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtrichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgdibromomethane
[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.21<0.2Org-0140.2mg/kgBenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgCyclohexane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene
66720<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane
68690<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg2,2-dichloropropane
71700<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgchloroform
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromochloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene
67680<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgChloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgBromomethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgVinyl Chloride
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgChloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019117/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted
223889-44LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 42 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
9510451051001105Org-014%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene
10595210098199Org-014%Surrogate Toluene-d8
779431061091108Org-014%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
1059531031001100Org-014%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kghexachlorobutadiene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgn-butyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,4-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgsec-butyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,3-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgtert-butyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg4-chlorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg2-chlorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgn-propyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgbromobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgisopropylbenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgo-Xylene
223889-44LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 43 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgstyrene
[NT][NT]0<2<259[NT]Org-0142mg/kgm+p-xylene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromoform
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgEthylbenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgchlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtetrachloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromoethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgdibromochloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,3-dichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<0.5<0.559[NT]Org-0140.5mg/kgToluene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,2-trichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,3-dichloropropene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,3-dichloropropene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromodichloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtrichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgdibromomethane
[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.259[NT]Org-0140.2mg/kgBenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgcarbon tetrachloride
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgCyclohexane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloropropene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1,1-trichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg2,2-dichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgchloroform
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromochloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgcis-1,2-dichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1-dichloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtrans-1,2-dichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgTrichlorofluoromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgChloroethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgBromomethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgVinyl Chloride
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgChloromethane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgDichlorodifluoromethane
[NT][NT]17/08/201917/08/201959[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 44 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]911310359[NT]Org-014%Surrogate 4-Bromofluorobenzene
[NT][NT]19910059[NT]Org-014%Surrogate Toluene-d8
[NT][NT]516210459[NT]Org-014%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
[NT][NT]110210359[NT]Org-014%Surrogate Dibromofluorometha
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kghexachlorobutadiene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgn-butyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg4-isopropyl toluene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,4-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgsec-butyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,3-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgtert-butyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg4-chlorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg2-chlorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgn-propyl benzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgbromobenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgisopropylbenzene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kg1,2,3-trichloropropane
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgo-Xylene
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 45 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]119410543[NT]Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<143[NT]Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene
[NT][NT]0<1<143[NT]Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene
[NT][NT]0<2<243[NT]Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene
[NT][NT]0<1<143[NT]Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene
[NT][NT]0<0.5<0.543[NT]Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene
[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.243[NT]Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene
[NT][NT]0<25<2543[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
[NT][NT]0<25<2543[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
[NT][NT]17/08/201917/08/201943[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
7783109710720[NT]Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<120[NT]Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene
681190<1<120[NT]Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene
68840<2<220[NT]Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene
69770<1<120[NT]Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene
75670<0.5<0.520[NT]Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene
67850<0.2<0.220[NT]Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene
70720<25<2520[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
70720<25<2520[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date extracted
223889-48LCS-5RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
1069431061091108Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<11<1Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene
128880<1<11<1Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene
127880<2<21<2Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene
122900<1<11<1Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene
104760<0.5<0.51<0.5Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene
70740<0.2<0.21<0.2Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene
110830<25<251<25Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
110830<25<251<25Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
17/08/201917/08/201917/08/201917/08/2019117/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted
223889-9LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 46 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]516210459[NT]Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene
[NT][NT]0<2<259[NT]Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene
[NT][NT]0<1<159[NT]Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene
[NT][NT]0<0.5<0.559[NT]Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene
[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.259[NT]Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene
[NT][NT]0<25<2559[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10
[NT][NT]0<25<2559[NT]Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C9
[NT][NT]17/08/201917/08/201959[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 47 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]13809143[NT]Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
[NT][NT]0<100<10043[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
[NT][NT]0<100<10043[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
[NT][NT]0<50<5043[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
[NT][NT]0<100<10043[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
[NT][NT]0<100<10043[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
[NT][NT]0<50<5043[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
[NT][NT]16/08/201916/08/201943[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
8412611908120[NT]Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
971130<100<10020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
6398813012020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
651090<50<5020[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
971130<100<10020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
63980<100<10020[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
651090<50<5020[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date extracted
223889-48LCS-5RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
1227849389183Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
901130<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
751110<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
791220<50<501<50Org-00350mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
901130<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
751110<100<1001<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
791220<50<501<50Org-00350mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019116/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted
223889-9LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 48 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]2817959[NT]Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
[NT][NT]0<100<10059[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40
[NT][NT]0<100<10059[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C16 -C34
[NT][NT]0<50<5059[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH >C10 -C16
[NT][NT]0<100<10059[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C29 - C36
[NT][NT]0<100<10059[NT]Org-003100mg/kgTRH C15 - C28
[NT][NT]0<50<5059[NT]Org-00350mg/kgTRH C10 - C14
[NT][NT]16/08/201916/08/201959[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 49 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
991031989720[NT]Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
[NT][NT]400.20.320[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
[NT][NT]00.20.220[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
#111290.30.420[NT]Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
[NT][NT]150.60.720[NT]Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
#108290.30.420[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene
[NT][NT]00.40.420[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
#122250.70.920[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene
#116350.7120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene
#111290.30.420[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
1031160<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
1131300<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date extracted
223889-48LCS-5RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Soil
969839491190Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
11910533<0.050.071<0.05Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
[NT][NT]0<0.2<0.21<0.2Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
1191020<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
1161130<0.10.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene
1121090<0.10.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene
1111070<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
1051100<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
1141230<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019116/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted
223889-9LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 50 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]39910259[NT]Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
[NT][NT]00.20.259[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
[NT][NT]00.10.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
[NT][NT]00.20.259[NT]Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
[NT][NT]500.50.359[NT]Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
[NT][NT]1000.30.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene
[NT][NT]400.30.259[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
[NT][NT]670.60.359[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene
[NT][NT]670.60.359[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene
[NT][NT]1000.30.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.159[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene
[NT][NT]16/08/201916/08/201959[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Soil
[NT][NT]2959743[NT]Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
[NT][NT]0<0.10.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
[NT][NT]120<0.050.243[NT]Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene
[NT][NT]40<0.20.343[NT]Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
[NT][NT]67<0.10.243[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene
[NT][NT]67<0.10.243[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene
[NT][NT]120<0.10.443[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene
[NT][NT]120<0.10.443[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene
[NT][NT]670.10.243[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene
[NT][NT]16/08/201916/08/201943[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 51 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]1878643[NT]Org-006%Surrogate TCMX
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1260
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1254
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1248
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1242
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1232
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1221
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1016
[NT][NT]16/08/201916/08/201943[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PCBs in Soil
[NT][NT]0868620[NT]Org-006%Surrogate TCMX
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1260
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1254
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1248
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1242
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1232
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1221
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.120[NT]Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1016
[NT][NT]16/08/201916/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date extracted
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PCBs in Soil
968549591190Org-006%Surrogate TCMX
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1260
1011110<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1254
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1248
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1242
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1232
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1221
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.11<0.1Org-0060.1mg/kgAroclor 1016
16/08/201916/08/201916/08/201916/08/2019116/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date extracted
223889-9LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PCBs in Soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 52 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]1711013043[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgZinc
[NT][NT]12343043[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgNickel
[NT][NT]0<0.1<0.143[NT]Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury
[NT][NT]24435543[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgLead
[NT][NT]5555843[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgCopper
[NT][NT]21373043[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgChromium
[NT][NT]0<0.4<0.443[NT]Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium
[NT][NT]0<4<443[NT]Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201943[NT]-Date prepared
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable metals in soil
7697812013020[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgZinc
879607720[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgNickel
969100.20.220[NT]Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury
8510191009120[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgLead
1029910596520[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgCopper
8810222121520[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgChromium
8496220.50.420[NT]Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium
9099157620[NT]Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/201920[NT]-Date prepared
223889-48LCS-5RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable metals in soil
7795496921<1Metals-0201mg/kgZinc
989313854101<1Metals-0201mg/kgNickel
861040<0.10.11<0.1Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury
1159198160551<1Metals-0201mg/kgLead
109974357371<1Metals-0201mg/kgCopper
10110313893171<1Metals-0201mg/kgChromium
9593670.8<0.41<0.4Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium
1039822541<4Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date prepared
223889-9LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable metals in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 53 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]35385459[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgZinc
[NT][NT]293459[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgNickel
[NT][NT]400.20.359[NT]Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury
[NT][NT]24334259[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgLead
[NT][NT]26101359[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgCopper
[NT][NT]2091159[NT]Metals-0201mg/kgChromium
[NT][NT]0<0.4<0.459[NT]Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium
[NT][NT]0<4<459[NT]Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201959[NT]-Date prepared
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable metals in soil
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 54 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT]0<5<577[NT]Inorg-0315mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201977[NT]-Date analysed
[NT][NT]15/08/201915/08/201977[NT]-Date prepared
[NT][NT]RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Misc Soil - Inorg
951010<5<51<5Inorg-0315mg/kgTotal Phenolics (as Phenol)
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/201915/08/201915/08/2019115/08/2019-Date prepared
223889-9LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Misc Soil - Inorg
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 55 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LStyrene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0132µg/Lm+p-xylene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromoform
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LEthylbenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LChlorobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTetrachloroethene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dibromoethane
[NT]87[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LDibromochloromethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,3-dichloropropane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LToluene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,2-trichloroethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Lcis-1,3-dichloropropene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Ltrans-1,3-dichloropropene
[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromodichloromethane
[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTrichloroethene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dichloropropane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LDibromomethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LCarbon tetrachloride
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LCyclohexane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1-dichloropropene
[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1,1-trichloroethane
[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dichloroethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L2,2-dichloropropane
[NT]96[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LChloroform
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromochloromethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LCis-1,2-dichloroethene
[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1-dichloroethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTrans-1,2-dichloroethene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LChloroethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LBromomethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LVinyl Chloride
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LChloromethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01310µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane
[NT]16/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]16/08/2019-Date analysed
[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date extracted
[NT]LCS-W2RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 56 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]103Org-013%Surrogate 4-BFB
[NT]100[NT][NT][NT][NT]100Org-013%Surrogate toluene-d8
[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]104Org-013%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Ln-butyl benzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L4-isopropyl toluene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,4-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LSec-butyl benzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,3-dichlorobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,4-trimethyl benzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LTert-butyl benzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,3,5-trimethyl benzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L4-chlorotoluene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L2-chlorotoluene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Ln-propyl benzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LBromobenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LIsopropylbenzene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/L1,2,3-trichloropropane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/Lo-xylene
[NT]LCS-W2RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: VOCs in water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 57 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]103Org-016%Surrogate 4-BFB
[NT]100[NT][NT][NT][NT]100Org-016%Surrogate toluene-d8
[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]104Org-016%Surrogate Dibromofluoromethane
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0131µg/LNaphthalene
[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/Lo-xylene
[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0162µg/Lm+p-xylene
[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/LEthylbenzene
[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/LToluene
[NT]93[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161µg/LBenzene
[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01610µg/LTRH C6 - C10
[NT]92[NT][NT][NT][NT]<10Org-01610µg/LTRH C6 - C9
[NT]16/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]16/08/2019-Date analysed
[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date extracted
[NT]LCS-W2RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 58 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
10096[NT][NT][NT][NT]81Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl
10074[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100µg/LTRH >C34 - C40
7270[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100µg/LTRH >C16 - C34
8976[NT][NT][NT][NT]<50Org-00350µg/LTRH >C10 - C16
10074[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100µg/LTRH C29 - C36
7270[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100µg/LTRH C15 - C28
8976[NT][NT][NT][NT]<50Org-00350µg/LTRH C10 - C14
15/08/201915/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date analysed
15/08/201915/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date extracted
223889-89LCS-W1RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 59 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT]98[NT][NT][NT][NT]84Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
[NT]82[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0122µg/LBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene
[NT]84[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LChrysene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene
[NT]88[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LPyrene
[NT]84[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LFluoranthene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LAnthracene
[NT]84[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LPhenanthrene
[NT]98[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LFluorene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LAcenaphthene
[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LAcenaphthylene
[NT]116[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0121µg/LNaphthalene
[NT]16/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]16/08/2019-Date analysed
[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date extracted
[NT]LCS-W1RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Water
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 60 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.02Metals-0200.02mg/LZinc - Dissolved
[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.02Metals-0200.02mg/LNickel - Dissolved
[NT]97[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.0005Metals-0210.0005mg/LMercury - Dissolved
[NT]102[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.03Metals-0200.03mg/LLead - Dissolved
[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.01Metals-0200.01mg/LCopper - Dissolved
[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.01Metals-0200.01mg/LChromium - Dissolved
[NT]106[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.01Metals-0200.01mg/LCadmium - Dissolved
[NT]109[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.05Metals-0200.05mg/LArsenic - Dissolved
[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date analysed
[NT]15/08/2019[NT][NT][NT][NT]15/08/2019-Date digested
[NT]LCS-W1RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description
Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Metals in Water - Dissolved
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 61 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
Not ReportedNR
National Environmental Protection MeasureNEPM
Not specifiedNS
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD
Greater than>
Less than<
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Insufficient sample for this testINS
Test not requiredNA
Not testedNT
Result Definitions
Australian Drinking Water Guidelines recommend that Thermotolerant Coliform, Faecal Enterococci, & E.Coli levels are less than1cfu/100mL. The recommended maximums are taken from "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines", published by NHMRC & ARMC2011.
Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds whichare similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.
Surrogate Spike
This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortifiedwith analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.
LCS (LaboratoryControl Sample)
A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spikeis to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferencesexist.
Matrix Spike
This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selectedshould be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.
Duplicate
This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as forsamples.
Blank
Quality Control Definitions
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 62 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
Analysis of aqueous samples typically involves the extraction/digestion and/or analysis of the liquid phase only (i.e. NOT any settledsediment phase but inclusive of suspended particles if present), unless stipulated on the Envirolab COC and/or by correspondence.Notable exceptions include certain Physical Tests (pH/EC/BOD/COD/Apparent Colour etc.), Solids testing, total recoverable metalsand PFAS where solids are included by default.
Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.
Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity of the analysis whererecommended technical holding times may have been breached.
When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis hasproceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon aspracticable.
In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, thesample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.
Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics (+/-50% surrogates)and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.
Duplicates: >10xPQL - RPD acceptance criteria will vary depending on the analytes and the analytical techniques but is typically inthe range 20%-50% – see ELN-P05 QA/QC tables for details; <10xPQL - RPD are higher as the results approach PQL and theestimated measurement uncertainty will statistically increase.
For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.
Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.
Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sampleextraction.
Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meetor exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries forthe batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Acceptance Criteria
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 63 of 64
Client Reference: 364678
PAHs in Soil - The RPD for duplicate results is accepted due to the non homogenous nature of sample 223889-59 # Percent recovery for the matrix spike is not possible to report as the high concentration of analytes in sample 223889-48 have caused interference. Acid Extractable Metals in Soil: The laboratory RPD acceptance criteria has been exceeded for 223889-1 for Cr, Pb and Ni. Therefore a triplicate result has been issued as laboratory sample number 223889-92. TRH Water(C10-C40) NEPM - The positive result in the rinsate sample is due to a single peak with no hydrocarbon profile that is consistent with the use of plastic containers.
Report Comments
Envirolab Reference: 223889
R01Revision No:
Page | 64 of 64
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX D CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ANALYSIS
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
Sources COC Media Receptor Exposure Route Comments Investigation Level Pathway
complete
General site sources (e.g.
historical industrial land
use, fill material)
Heavy metals, TRH, BTEX, PAHs, Phenols, VOCs, and PCBs
Soil
Human
Direct contact, inhalation and
ingestion of dust, ingestion
Concentrations of COCs in all soil samples analysed were below the adopted human health and ecological criteria.
HSLs / HILs No
Ecological species and soil microbial
processes Direct Contact
Majority of COCs beneath ecological protection criteria with exception of selected heavy metals and benzo(a)pyrene in selected samples. The majority of the site is covered in hardstand cement or asphalt with minimum landscaping present, thus the exposure pathway is generally incomplete and therefore the EIL/ESLs are not entirely applicable.
ESLs Unlikely
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX E QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Contents Page E 1 Introduction 2
2 Data Quality Control and Quality Assurance 3
2.1 Measurement Data Quality Indicators 3 2.2 Field QA/QC 2 2.3 Laboratory QA/QC 4 2.4 QA/QC Data Evaluation 4
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
1 Introduction
The data quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program is undertaken to ensure the data delivered is precise, accurate and representative of what is sampled.
QA/QC should be considered both in the field and within the laboratory. The objective is to enable evaluation and identification of the data quality objectives (DQOs), the method data quality objectives (MDQOs) and the data quality indicators (DQIs) which we use to assess whether the DQOs have been met.
Development of data quality objectives (DQOs) for each project is a requirement of the National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (Amended 2013). This is based on a DQO process formulated by the USEPA for contaminated land assessment and remediation. DQOs have been developed in Section 3.0 of the report.
Data quality is typically discussed in terms of precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability and completeness. These are referred to as the PARCC parameters. The PARCC and additional QA parameters are discussed within this report.
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
2 Data Quality Control and Quality Assurance
2.1 Measurement Data Quality Indicators Step 5 of the DQO process is a focus on the quality of the information by measurement, commonly referred to as the measurement data quality indicators (MDQIs). The MDQIs are described in Section 3 of the report.
All sampling procedures need to be undertaken according to a standard procedure, in particular those procedures set out in:
• Standards Australia AS4482.1 (2005) Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil. Part 1 Non-volatile and semi volatile compounds
• Standards Australia AS 4482.2 (1999) Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil. Part 2: Volatile substances
• National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (Amended 2013)
• CRC CARE 2013, Petroleum hydrocarbon vapour intrusion assessment: Australian guidance, CRC CARE Technical Report no. 23, CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Adelaide, Australia; and
• NSW Department of Environment Climate Change & Water (2010) Vapour Intrusion Technical Practice Note.
Measurement data quality is typically discussed in terms of Measured Parameters and Assessed Parameters. Methods of assessing measured parameters include duplicate samples for repeatability (comparability) and internal laboratory tests on accuracy and precision. Methods of analysing assessed parameters include sample documentation (completeness), representation of site conditions undertaken by development of a conceptual site model, and the comparison of results/investigation criteria to the sensitivity of analytical methods.
The laboratories used should be NATA accredited for the analytical methods undertaken. Containers, sample preservation (if necessary) and holding times should be consistent with industry practices as set out in the NEPM and as defined by ASTM.
2.1.1 Repeatability (Field Collected Intra-laboratory and Inter-laboratory Duplicates)
Field collected intra-laboratory (intralab) duplicate samples provide a check on the analytical performance of the laboratory. Soil primary and intralab duplicate samples were sent to Envirolab Services (Envirolab) for analysis.
It is recommended that at least 5 percent of samples (1 in 20) from a site should be collected in duplicate. For split samples, because of error associated with field splitting, a relative percentage difference (RPD) of between <30% and <150% (depending on the substance) will be allowed as the MDQI. Any value >50% RPD will be noted and discussed, as per Standards Australia requirements, with respect to its acceptability for inclusion in the data-set.
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
2.1.2 Precision
Precision is a measure of the reproducibility of results, and is assessed on the basis of agreement between a set of replicate results obtained from duplicate analyses. The precision of a duplicate determination can be measured as relative percentage difference (RPD), and is calculated from the following equation:
100
221
X2 - X1 = RPD ×
+ XX
where: X1 is the first duplicate value
X2 is the second duplicate value
The field duplicate results and calculated RPDs for soil are presented in Tables E1.
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Table E1 Soil - intralab duplicate samples (mg/kg)
Analyte LOR BH02_1.0-1.1
QC01-1.0-1.1
RPD % BH07_1.0-1.1
QC02_1.0-1.1
RPD % BH18_1.0-1.1
QC04_1.0-1.1
RPD %
TRH 25, 50, 100, 100 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
BTEX 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Arsenic 4 ND ND NC ND ND NC 6 ND 40
Cadmium 0.4 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Chromium 1 1 ND NC ND ND NC 4 5 22
Copper 1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 15 15 0
Lead 1 1 ND NC 1 2 67 44 73 50
Mercury 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.1 0.3 100
Nickel 1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 3 3 0
Zinc 1 2 1 67 1 1 0 77 67 14
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene 0.2 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.4 0.8 67
Acenaphthene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Acenaphthylene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Anthracene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Benz(a)anthracene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.4 67
Benzo(a) pyrene 0.05 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.4 67
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.3 40
Chrysene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.4 67
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Analyte LOR BH02_1.0-1.1
QC01-1.0-1.1
RPD % BH07_1.0-1.1
QC02_1.0-1.1
RPD % BH18_1.0-1.1
QC04_1.0-1.1
RPD %
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Fluoranthene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.4 0.8 67
Fluorene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.1 0.2 67
Naphthalene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC ND ND NC
Phenanthrene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.2 0.5 86
Pyrene 0.1 ND ND NC ND ND NC 0.4 0.8 67
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (Half) 0.5 ND ND NC ND ND NC <0.5 0.6 18
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR) 0.5 ND ND NC ND ND NC <0.5 0.6 18
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (Zero) 0.5 ND ND NC ND ND NC <0.5 0.5 0
PAHs (Sum of positives) 0.05 ND ND NC ND ND NC 2.4 4.9 68
Notes to tables: 1 LOR laboratory limit of reporting 2 RPD relative percentage difference 3 N/A not analysed 4 ND not detected above the laboratory limits of reporting 5 NC RPD not calculable 6 Acceptance Criteria - no limit applies to < 5x LOR 7 Acceptance Criteria - 80-150% for low level (<10 x LOR) 8 Acceptance Criteria - 50-130% for medium to high level (>10 x LOR)
All RPDs were within the acceptable criteria (50-130% for medium to high level (>10 x LOR)).
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
2.1.3 Accuracy
Accuracy is a measure of the agreement between an experimental determination and the true value of the parameter being measured. The determination of accuracy can be achieved through the analysis of known reference materials or assessed by the analysis of matrix spikes. Accuracy is measured in terms of percentage recovery as defined by the following equation:
%R = SSR - SR
SA X 100
where: %R = percentage recovery of the spike
SSR = spiked sample result
SR = sample result (native)
SA = spike added
Laboratory personnel calculate percentage recoveries of spiked compounds, which are evaluated against control or acceptance limits taken from the appropriate method or the Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work. If the spike recovery for a sample does not fall within the prescribed control limits, laboratory based corrective action is required.
Surrogate spikes consist of spiking non-target compounds into the sample prior to analysis. The spiked compounds are expected to behave during analysis in the same way as the target compounds. Every sample is spiked prior to extraction or analysis with surrogate compounds that are representative of the analysis. If surrogate spike recovery does not meet the prescribed control limits, samples should be reanalysed.
2.1.4 Representativeness
All media identified within the sampling plan was selectively sampled and analysed for relevant COCs.
2.1.5 Completeness
The following information is required to check for completeness of data sets:
• chain-of-custody forms (completed by KPMG SGA and the laboratory)
• sample receipt forms
• all requested sample results reported
• all blank data reported
• all surrogate spike data reported
• all matrix spike data reported
• NATA stamp on reports.
2.1.6 Comparability
Comparability is the evaluation of the similarity of conditions (e.g. sample depth, sample homogeneity, sampling procedures) under which separate sets of data are produced to ensure minimal common error. Data comparability should be demonstrated by the use of standardised sampling and analysis procedures. Data comparability was maintained by undertaking the TEI as follows:
• Soil samples were collected during the investigation by a trained environmental consultant using standard operating procedures
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
• laboratories used for analysis for all samples used NATA accredited analytical methods.
2.1.7 Sensitivity
When interferences are present in the sample, a loss of sensitivity can occur resulting in an increase in the method detection limit. In some instances (e.g. where one or more compounds have particularly high concentrations) the sample must be diluted for analysis. This increases the method detection limit by the dilution factor.
The detection limits achieved by the laboratory, when adjusted for dry weight and interferences from the presence of other chemicals within the sampled matrix, must be less than half the site criteria for all analytes tested (i.e. 2 x LOR <site criteria). This was not achieved in all sub-slab vapour samples due to the need for dilution.
2.1.8 Blanks
To meet the QC acceptance criteria, laboratory blanks should have no detectable concentrations of the target compounds. Review of laboratory blanks did not reveal concentrations of COCs above the LOR.
2.1.9 Holding Times
Sample holding times are based on a number of considerations including the integrity of the data required, field storage, laboratory storage and sample container characteristics. All samples were analysed within the required holding times.
2.1.10 Procedures for Anomalous Samples and Confirmation Checking
All results should be checked for discrepancies by the project manager, against the anticipated results and all other results, within 8 hours of receipt of the results from the laboratory.
Any result that is considered by the supervising scientist to be unusually high or at variance with other results is automatically re-analysed. A significantly different result requires immediate remedial action on the whole sample batch (retesting or using an alternative analytical method).
After appropriate checking by laboratories, all sample analysis results work-sheets, including those of duplicates and replicate analyses, should be checked by the project manager.
Once confirmation checking is completed the final laboratory report is issued.
For blind duplicates, if one sample has more than two analytes exceeding the MDQIs the sample is carefully checked. If the error is not apparent, the sample is rejected. If more than three samples are rejected all the samples collected at that time are rejected. These samples are then re-sampled and re-analysed.
2.2 Field QA/QC
2.2.1 Details of Field Investigation Team
Fieldwork was conducted by suitably qualified KPMG SGA personnel between 12 and 13 August 2019.
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
2.2.2 Sampling Controls
Decontamination procedures carried out between sampling events
Soil samples were collected directly from the push tubes or hand auger using disposable nitrile gloves. The push tube sampling used individual tubing and sample collection equipment, as such, decontamination of sample collection equipment was not required. The hand auger were was thoroughly washed with Decon 90 followed by deionised laboratory supplied rinsate water between sampling locations.
Sample notation details
The chemical analyses to be performed on each sample were recorded on the chain of custody documentation which also identified for each sample – the nature of the sample, collection date, analyses to be performed and sample preservation method (if any).
Duplicate sampling
Intralab duplicate samples were collected at a rate of at least one field duplicate sample for each media.
Trip Spikes
A trip spike water sample was included in the batch of soil samples within carriers used to transport samples to the laboratory to assess potential cross contamination between samples during handling and transport of samples. The MDQI for trip spike sample analysis is between 70-120% recoveries for VOCs. Review of the trip spike sample results revealed concentrations of all VOCs within acceptable ranges.
Table E7 Trip Spike samples
Analyte Trip Spike
% Recovery Accept / Fail
Benzene 120 Accept
Toluene 113 Accept
Ethylbenzene 109 Accept
M + p xylene 106 Accept
0-Xylene 110 Accept
Trip Blanks
A trip blank water sample was included in the soil sample carriers used to transport samples to the laboratory to assess potential cross contamination between samples during handling and transport of samples. The MDQI for trip blank sample analysis is non-detect for VOCs and TRH. Review of trip blank sample results revealed non-detects for all COCs and are summarised in Table E5.
Table E5 Trip blank samples
Analyte LOR Trip Blank Accept / Fail
TRH Various <LOR Accept
All VOCs Various <LOR Accept
Environmental Site Investigation
112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSW Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for
Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality and Control
364678 – Appendix E – Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Rinsate Samples
Rinsate samples were used to measure potential cross contamination between samples due to contamination of sampling equipment. The hand auger was washed with Decon 90 followed by laboratory supplied rinsate water between sampling locations. A representative rinsate sample was collected and analysed from each equipment. The MDQI for rinsate sample analysis is non-detect for COCs. Review of rinsate sample results revealed non-detects for all COCs and are summarised in Table E6.
Table E6 Rinsate samples
Analyte LOR RB01 Accept / Fail
TRH, PAH, BTEX & heavy metals Various <LOR Accept
2.3 Laboratory QA/QC Primary laboratory analysis for this project was completed by Envirolab in Sydney for soil samples. Envirolab is accredited by NATA for the methods used; details of this accreditation can be viewed at http://www.nata.asn.au/. Details of the samples sent to the laboratories and the analysis requested are contained in the chain of custody documentation. The collection date of samples and laboratory extraction date are also presented on the chain of custody forms and/or laboratory transcripts. All analysis was completed within the allowable holding times.
The laboratories complete laboratory control samples, laboratory blanks, sample duplicates, surrogate spikes and matrix spikes. The laboratory transcripts include details of surrogates and spikes used, percent recoveries of surrogates and spikes used, the instrument detection limits, the method detection limits, the practical quantification limits and the reference sample results.
2.4 QA/QC Data Evaluation Field and laboratory quality procedures for this project are considered to be acceptable. Holding times for samples were also considered acceptable.
The calculated RPD values for heavy metals between the duplicate and corresponding primary sample were within the acceptance limits with the exception of heavy metals (lead and mercury) and PAHs (Phenanthrene and total PAHs) in soil. The slightly raised RPD for heavy metals and PAHs is not considered to affect the integrity of the results and it should be noted that the concentrations detected were still well beneath the investigation criteria.
Based on information reviewed, the soil data sets are considered to be acceptable.
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX F BOREHOLE LOGS
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 1/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH01_0.1-0.2
BH01_0.4-0.5
BH01_1.0-1.1
BH01_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown with rootlets &gravels, slightly moist, loose
FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, fine to coarse grained, grey/brown,angular gravels, slightly moist, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown-brown, moist,dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow-light yellow, moist tovery moist, dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH01
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 2/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH02_0.3-0.4
BH02_0.6-0.7
BH02_1.0-1.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, dark brown/lightgrey, angular & subangular gravels, dry, very loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, yellow, dry, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown with gravels,slightly moist, moderately dense
End of borehole: 1.6 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH02
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 3/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH03_0.3-0.4
BH03_0.6-0.7
BH03_1.0-1.1
BH03_2.0-2.1
Y U
Concrete
FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, dark brown/lightgrey, angular & subangular gravels, dry, very looseConcreteNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY CLAY, low/medium plasticity, dark grey, moist tovery moist, firm
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH03
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 4/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH04_0.3-0.4
BH04_0.6-0.7
BH04_1.0-1.1
BH04_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, lightyellow/grey, angular & sub angular gravels, dry, very looseConcreteNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,loose
NATURAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, low plasticityclay, slightly moist, moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY CLAY, medium/high plasticity, darkbrown-brown, moist, soft
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH04
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 5/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH05_0.2-0.3
BH05_0.5-0.6
BH05_1.0-1.1
BH05_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, with gravels, dry, loose
ConcreteFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, dry with gravels
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey/grey, dry, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light grey, slightly moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,dense
End of borehole: 2.1 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH05
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 6/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH06_0.2-0.3
BH06_0.5-0.6
BH06_1.0-1.1
BH06_1.5-1.6
Y
Y
Y
D
D
D
FILL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark brown-black, lowplasticity clay with gravels and rootlets, slightly moist to moist,looseFILL: SANDY CLAY, low plasticity, brown-dark brown, fine grainedsand, slightly moist to moist, soft
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow & grey, moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown-dark brown, moist,moderately dense
End of borehole: 1.8 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH06
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 7/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH07_0.1-0.2
BH07_0.4-0.5
BH07_1.0-1.1
BH07_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown with gravels, dry, veryloose
FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown & grey,angular & subangular gravels, dry, very looseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, slightly moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist,moderately dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH07
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 8/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH08_0.2-0.3
BH08_0.5-0.6 Y U
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown with gravels, dry, veryloose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow, with crushedsandstone, dry, dense
End of borehole: 0.9 mBGL refusal in SANDSTONE
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH08
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 9/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH09_0.2-0.3
BH09_0.5-0.6
BH09_1.0-1.1
BH09_2.0-2.1
Y U
AsphaltFILL: GRAVELLY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey,angular & subangular gravels, dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light brown-brown,slightly moist, moderately denseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist, dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, moist, dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown & yellow, moist,very dense
End of borehole: 2.1 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH09
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 10/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH10_0.3-0.4
BH10_0.6-0.7
Y U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey with gravels,dry, looseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow with crushedsandstone, slightly moist, moderately dense
End of borehole: 0.7 mBGL refusal in SANDSTONE
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH10
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 11/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH11_0.3-0.4
BH11_0.6-0.7
BH11_1.0-1.1
Y U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey with gravels,dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown-red, dry, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown-grey, slightlymoist, moderately dense
End of borehole: 1.3 mBGL refusal in SANDSTONE
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH11
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 12/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH12_0.2-0.3
BH12_0.5-0.6
BH12_1.0-1.1
BH12_2.0-2.1
Y U
AsphaltFILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, dark brown withgravels, dry, loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown/light, dry, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark yellow, slightly moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow, moist, dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow, moist, dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH12
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 13/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH13_0.2-0.3
BH13_0.5-0.6
BH13_1.0-1.1
BH13_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
AsphaltFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown-dark brown withgravels, dry, very looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, dry, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark yellow/ brown, moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, yellow, moist, moderatelydense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey-grey, moist,dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH13
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 14/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH14_0.2-0.3
BH14_0.5-0.6
BH14_1.0-1.1
Y D
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown with gravelsand rootlets, slightly moist, loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, moist, moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist, dense
End of borehole: 1.6 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH14
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 15/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH15_0.2-0.3
BH15_0.5-0.6
BH15_1.0-1.1
BH15_1.5-1.6
Y D
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown with gravelsand rootlets, dry, loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown/grey with gravels, slightlymoist, moderately dense
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, moist, dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light grey, moist, dense
End of borehole: 1.6 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH15
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger
DRILLING DATE 12/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 16/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH16_0.1-0.2
BH16_0.4-0.5
BH16_1.0-1.1
BH16_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown with rootlets, dry,very loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey, slightly moist, loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey with gravels,slightly moist , looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained,dark brown-brown, slightly moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, light yellow, moist to verymoist, dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH16
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 17/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH17_0.2-0.3
BH17_0.5-0.6
BH17_1.0-1.1
Y U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey & red withgravels, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey, with concreterubble, slightly moist, looseFILL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, low plasticity clay,slightly moist, moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, moist,dense
End of borehole: 2.1 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH17
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 18/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH18_0.3-0.4
BH18_0.7-0.8
BH18_1.0-1.1
BH18_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey withgravels, dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown/light brown withgravels, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown, moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, moist,dense
NAUTRAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey-brown, lowplasticity clay, dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH18
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 19/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH19_0.3-0.4
BH19_0.6-0.7
BH19_1.0-1.1
BH19_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, light brown with gravels,moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, black, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light grey, slightly moist,looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist, looseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown-grey, moist,dense
NATURAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, low plasticityclay, moist, dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
Ash material observed
BOREHOLE LOG BH19
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
21/08/2019 ESlog
https://eslog.esdat.net/# 20/23
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH20_0.2-0.3
BH20_0.5-0.6
BH20_1.0-1.1
BH20_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, medium/coarse grained, light grey withgravels, slightly moist, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, black, dry, looseFILL: SILTY SAND, coarse grained, light brown, dry, loose
NATURAL: CLAYEY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, low plasticityclay, moist, soft
End of borehole: 2.1 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
Ash material observed
BOREHOLE LOG BH20
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH21_0.2-0.3
BH21_0.5-0.6
BH21_1.0-1.1
BH21_2.0-2.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown, slightly moist,looseFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, grey-dark grey withgravels, slightly moist, loose
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, slightly moist,moderately dense
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark grey, moist, dense
End of borehole: 2.2 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH21
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH22_0.2-0.3
BH22_0.5-0.6
BH22_1.0-1.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, light brown with gravels,slightly moist, very looseConcreteFILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, dark brown, slightlymoist, loose
NATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, grey-dark grey, moist,moderately dense
End of borehole: 1.5 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH22
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
BH23_0.2-0.3
BH23_0.5-0.6
BH23_1.0-1.1
Y
Y
U
U
Concrete
FILL: SILTY SAND, fine/medium grained, brown, dry very loose
ConcreteFILL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown/grey, dry, moderatelydense
FILL: GRAVELLY SAND, fine grained, grey-dark grey, angular &subangular gravels, dry, moderately denseNATURAL: SILTY SAND, fine grained, dark brown, slightly moist,moderately dense
End of borehole: 2.0 mBGL in NATURAL SOIL
No odour and/or stainingobserved
BOREHOLE LOG BH23
PROJECT NUMBER 364678PROJECT NAME ESIADDRESS 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria NSWCLIENT Lend Lease Funds Management Limitedas trustee for Australian Prime Property FundIndustrial
DRILLER Stratacore Drilling Pty LtdDRILL RIG Geoprobe 6712DTMETHOD Hand Auger & Push Tube
DRILLING DATE 13/08/2019LOGGED BY M LEONGCHECKED BY A BARBER
COMMENTS
Dep
th (m
) Samples
Ana
lyse
d
Sam
ple
Type
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description Additional Observations
Disclaimer This bore log is intended for environmental not geotechnical purposes.produced by ESlog.ESdat.net on 21 Aug 2019
Page 1 of 1
Environmental Site Investigation 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW
Lend Lease Funds Management Limited as trustee for Australian Prime Property Fund Industrial c/- Jones Lang LaSalle (VIC) Pty Ltd
29 August 2019
364678 - 112-120 Euston Road, Alexandria, NSW - Environmental Site Investigation - KPMG SGA FINAL 29-08-19
APPENDIX G REPORT LIMITATIONS
KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd (KPMG SGA)Report Limitations
We advise that, unless specifically stated otherwise within the body of this document, the following Limitations apply to our Report;
• Sections within this Report may contain additional Limitations relevant to the reporting discipline concerned. These must be viewed as additional limitations that stand separately, and in addition to, the following Limitations.
• No reliance should be placed on draft reports, draft conclusions or draft advice issued by us as they may be subject to further work, revision and other factors which may mean that drafts are substantially different from any FINAL report or advice issued.
• Parts of the building built in, covered up or otherwise made inaccessible during construction, alteration or fitting out have not been inspected.
• This generally relates to ceiling voids, wall cavities and service risers. Therefore we are unable to comment as to whether such elements are free from defect or infestation.
• We have not undertaken any work of a specific engineering nature, such as engineering calculations, structural analysis, testing or measurements as the Report reflects our interpretation of the condition of the building as apparent from the inspection.
• Building services have been visually inspected where exposed to view only. No internal inspections have been undertaken of plant, equipment and machinery or where services are covered up or hidden by building structural elements or finishes. Building services have not been tested and no design calculations have been undertaken.
• The property has not been inspected specifically for termite infestation and we would only report on such if evidence of termite activity was apparent during our inspection.
• Where a variety of multiple units or tenanted areas are inspected, a random selection of each type of unit / area was inspected and used for the basis of this report.
• This Report is not a certification, a warranty or guarantee and has been scoped in accordance with the instructions given and the time allowed.
• The scope of the Report is described in the fee proposal accepted by the instructing client and disciplines not specifically mentioned are excluded from this report.
• This Report has been prepared for the benefit of the instructing client named on the cover of the document. This Report is not to be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the express written authorisation of KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Ltd.
• The findings of this Report are valid for six calendar months from the date of issue of the Draft version of the document.
• Unless specifically stated otherwise, all cost estimates provided throughout the Report are subject to the following Limitations;
• Estimates are indicative only and are provided as a guide to “order of magnitude” of the cost item. Items of work are not fully described or detailed reflecting the high level nature of the assessment, the amount of information available and the purpose for which they are prepared;
• Preliminaries, builder’s margins, overheads and contingencies are excluded;
• Professional fees, project management fees, planning and building licence fees are excluded;
• No allowance has been made for Tender Price Inflation throughout the budget terms considered;
• In providing estimates we have assumed that replacements and renewals will be on a like for like basis. Unless specifically stated otherwise we have made no allowances for improvements over and above this standard.
• We have assume that WH&S /OH&S requirements will be similar to those encountered in the present and have made no allowances for any additional measures that may be required in the future.
© 2017 KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Limited, an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. January 2017. QLDN14967ADV.
www.sgaproperty.com
Exceptional chartered building surveying and environmental servicesFor property investors, owners, tenants, financiers and managers
© 2017 KPMG SGA Property Consultancy Pty Limited, an affiliate of KPMG. KPMG is an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. January 2017. QLDN14967ADV.
www.sgaproperty.com
• Technical Due Diligence – Acquisition / Disposal
• Make Good / Dilapidations Reporting
• End of Lease Make Good / Dilapidations Negotiations
• Schedules of Condition
• Tax Depreciation
• Project & Contract Administration
• CAPEX & Maintenance Forecasting
• Defect Reporting
• Asbestos & Hazardous Materials Assessments / Registers / Remediation
• Environmental Investigations / Remediation
• NABERS & BEEC
• WHS Risk Assessments
• Disability Access Audits
• Building Code Consultancy
• Statutory Compliance
Capitalising on a global skill base, all senior KPMG SGA consultants are Chartered Building Surveyors, Engineers or Environmental Scientists, providing the company with a breadth of understanding across many specialist competencies, which is the key to our speed of assessment, service and delivery.
SydneyInternational Towers Sydney 3300 Barangaroo Avenue Sydney NSW 2000Australia+61 2 9335 [email protected]
MelbourneTower Two, Collins Square727 Collins StreetMelbourne VIC 3008Australia+61 3 9288 [email protected]
BrisbaneRiparian PlazaLevel 16, 71 Eagle StreetBrisbane Qld 4000Australia+61 7 3233 [email protected]
Perth235 St Georges TerracePerth WA 6000Australia+61 8 9263 [email protected]
Canberra20 Brindabella CircuitBrindabella Business ParkCanberra Airport ACT 2609Australia+61 2 6248 [email protected]
Adelaide151 Pirie StreetAdelaide SA 5000Australia+61 8 9263 [email protected]
Darwin18 Smith StreetDarwin NT 0800Australia+61 8 9263 [email protected]
HobartLevel 3 100 Melville StreetHobart Tas 7000Australia+61 3 9288 [email protected]
Singapore16 Raffles Quay #22-00Hong Leong BuildingSingapore 048581+65 9005 [email protected]
AucklandKPMG Centre 18 Viaduct Harbour AvePO Box 1584Auckland 1140New Zealand+64 21 [email protected]
Contact us