[entity name] [function certifying] certification review

[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Reviewfor [RELATED ENTITIES][LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name, Title]Closing Presentation [Month Day, Year]

[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY2

Thanks

• [Thanks to Entity Management]• [Thanks to Entity Certification Review Team]• [Thanks to ???????]• [Thanks to ???????]• [Thanks to ???????]

[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]


Topics to Review

• Certification Review Process and Team Members • Positives• Bucket Items• Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline and Reminders• Feedback• Questions and Answers



Standards Reviewed

• [Standard 1 i.e. EOP-008-0] [Standard Title]• [Standard 2 ] [Standard Title]• [Standard 3 ] [Standard Title]• [Standard 4 ] [Standard Title]• [Standard 5 ] [Standard Title]• [Standard 6 ] [Standard Title]• [Standard … ] [Standard Title]



NERC (BA) (RC) (TOP) Certification Review

• Certification Review Process• Performed Per the NERC Rules of Procedure Section 500 and

Appendix 5A

• The Certification Review Team• [Team Leader 1 (CTL)] [Company affiliation]• [Team Member 2] [Company affiliation]• [Team Member 3] [Company affiliation]• [Team Member 4] [Company affiliation]• [Team Member 5] [Company affiliation]• [Team Member 6] [Company affiliation]



Positives

• Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES






Positives(Cont.)







This slide is for info only

Use one of the next two slides.


Bucket 1 Items

Bucket 1 Items Certification Review Team recommends a full certification based on the following conclusions:

• 1st Issue – Based on the following evidence• 2nd Issue – Based on the following evidence• 3rd Issue – Based on the following evidence



Bucket 1 Items

Bucket 1 Items There were no issues the Certification Review Team found that would prevent a recommendation of certification review approval.



Bucket 2 Items

The following items must be closed prior to certification review approval:

• Issue – Evidence required• Issue – Evidence required• Issue – Evidence required



Bucket 2 Items(Cont.)

• Issue – Evidence required• Issue – Evidence required• Issue – Evidence required



Bucket 3 Items

The following items are suggestions the Entity might consider to improve reliability and/or performance:

• Suggestion• Suggestion• Suggestion

These will not be included in the Final Summary Report



Bucket 3 Items(Cont.)

• Suggestion• Suggestion• Suggestion



Post Certification Review

Tentative TimelineNOTE: following dates are anticipated and subject to change• Closure of all Bucket 2 items by [Date]• A draft report will be provided to [Entity Name] by [Date After

bucket 2 items closed]• [Entity Name] to review draft report and return by [Date]

If [Entity Name] disagrees with the CRT conclusions, this should be communicated in writing immediately to NERC [email protected] and clearly state the reasons for disagreement.


mailto:[email protected]


Post Certification Review

Tentative Timeline (Cont)

• The final Summary Report, with [Entity Name]’s comments included where appropriate, will be reviewed by [REGIONAL ENTITY] management and upon approval, transmitted to [Entity Name] and submitted by [REGIONAL ENTITY] to NERC Approval by [DATE].

• The official letter confirming that a full certification is not required will be submitted [ENTITY] by NERC on [DATE].

NERC Alert needs to be advised if a change in Registration is effected.



[Entity Name] Feedback

• [Entity Name]’s feedback of the Certification Review process is sincerely requested. The ERO strives for continuous improvement, and tracks and reviews all feedback. Feedback forms will be provided via email. Please be candid when filling in the forms whether it is comments

regarding the process, the feedback forms and/or the CRT performance. Note that the feedback does not require naming the author of the

feedback. Please return the completed form to [RE Email] as soon as possible.



Questions and Answers


[entity name] [function certifying] certification review

Documents