enterprising future for oxford
TRANSCRIPT
George Smith,Department of Materials,Oxford University,Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PHUK
Email: [email protected]: www.materials.ox.ac.uk
The aims of the Department of Materials at Oxford
University stretch from cutting edge research to
encouraging knowledge of materials at school level.
At a time when some traditional scientific disciplines
are seeing student numbers fall, materials science –
and Oxford Materials – is gaining a higher profile
than ever before.
In 2001, Oxford Materials experienced one of the
most successful years in its 46-year history, says
head of department George Smith. Top rated in
The Times newspaper league table of materials
departments and the UK 2001 Research Assessment
Exercise, Oxford Materials is also now the largest –
with more active research staff than any other
materials institution in the country. Comprising
30 academics, 50 senior researchers, 60 postdocs,
20 visitors, and 75 research students, 10 of those
staff received prestigious prizes last year. Awards
came from bodies as diverse as the Royal Society and
the US National Academy of Engineering, with an
additional honor coming in the form of a knighthood
for former head of department Richard Brooks (now
on secondment as director of the Leverhulme Trust).
Blurring the boundariesDuring the last five years, the research objectives of the
Department have shifted in emphasis towards complex
multi-materials systems. Instead of categorizing research
into many subject-specific areas, activities now focus on
broader problems such as materials for aerospace
applications, rapid tooling, packaging, and biomedical
devices. Research is loosely grouped into four generic
areas – characterization, processing, properties, and theory
and modeling.
Characterization is a particular strength, with the largest
concentration of staff involved and a wealth of facilities
available. Recent research firsts include:
March 200242 ISSN:1369 7021 © Elsevier Science Ltd 2002
future for OxfordEnterprising
INSIGHT FEATURE
• atomic-scale characterization of one-dimensional crystals
encapsulated in single-wall nanotubes;
• in situ observation of fullerene growth on graphite;
• channeling contrast imaging of dislocation structures at
fatigue crack tips;
• in situ observation of magnetization reversal in magnetic
storage device conditions;
• manipulation of single atoms in a scanning tunneling
microscope at room temperature; and
• direct three-dimensional atom probe observations of
Cottrell atmospheres around dislocations in iron.
The development of new analysis and characterization
techniques is also a strong effort. To look at grain boundaries,
unusual geometries, or thin films, for example, selective area
specimen preparation is essential. Researchers at Oxford have
developed new focused ion beam methods. For surface
characterization, ultrasonic force microscopy has been
developed into a quantitative technique, with a technology
transfer royalty agreement signed with Semitech to produce
systems commercially. A collaboration with Unilever has led
to the construction of a tribological atomic force microscope.
Another technique, high mass resolution scanning atom
probe, has been developed as part of a BRITE-EURAM project
to analyze thin films. Atom probes are an area where the
Department has particular strengths, latterly including the
spinout company Oxford Nanoscience Ltd., which produces
three-dimensional atom probe microanalysis equipment.
Efforts to improve materials processing are concentrated
at the Oxford Centre for Advanced Materials and Composites
(OCAMAC), headed up by Patrick Grant. Originally a joint
enterprise with the Department of Engineering, OCAMAC
now draws input from the Departments of Physics and
Chemistry as well. Relations with industry have been
strengthened with the appointments of visiting professors:
currently Chris Peel, director of technology for future systems
at QinetiQ (formerly part of the Defence Evaluation and
Research Agency); and John Wood, CEO of Central
Laboratories of the Research Councils (CLRC); and in the past,
Clive Bradley, former director and now advisor to Sharp
Laboratories of Europe; and Brian Eyre, former deputy
director of AEA Technology and chairman of the CLRC. New
plasma spray techniques and improvements to bond-coats
have resulted from work with Rolls Royce, while extensive
work on aluminum casting has been carried out with Alcan.
With potential benefits for solidification problems, an ultra-
sensitive calorimeter and software for predicting
microsegregation in binary alloys has been developed in
conjunction with the UK’s National Physical Laboratory.
In the field of materials properties, research interests are
diverse, ranging from the electronic (oxygen transport in
silicon) to the biomedical (drug delivery system for the
treatment of wounds). Packaging has been a major area of
activity in recent years, with the study of layered composites
leading to various innovations. The research has led to a new
model of gas barrier properties and deformation behavior, as
well as a better understanding of how these properties can be
controlled by growth conditions. The impact has been
significant – existing processes have been improved and
entirely new processes developed.
The fourth key area of activity is in theory and modeling.
Under the direction of Adrian Sutton, the Materials Modelling
Laboratory’s remit is diverse, bringing together both external
partners and complementary research within the Department.
In quantum mechanics, recent work includes the development
of new theories for current-induced forces in metallic
nanocontacts and giant magneto-resistance. The lab has also
worked with British Nuclear Fuels to develop ab initio
methods for predicting the energy of strongly correlated
oxides. The process of bond formation and breakage during
chemical vapor deposition has been modeled as part of a US
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency effort. On the
processing side, Monte Carlo methods have been applied to
clustering, ordering, and phase separation in alloys. Discrete
dislocation dynamics have proved a successful approach for
modeling crack tip plasticity, fatigue crack growth, and the
brittle-to-ductile transition in various materials.
March 2002 43
Fig. 1 UK Minister for Science, Lord Sainsbury, with former head of department BrianCantor at the opening ceremony of the Begbroke Business and Science Park.
A total annual research income of about £5 million
supports the work – and the state-of-the-art facilities that
are required. Recent investment in equipment alone, from the
UK Government’s Joint Infrastructure Fund (JIF), Joint
Research Equipment Initiative (JREI), and the Engineering and
Physical Science Research Council, totals almost £15 million.
The Department has built up extensive microscopy facilities
including the UK’s only three-dimensional atom probes for
atomic scale microanalysis; a 400 kV ultra-high resolution
electron microscope; the UK’s first field-emission gun, 300 kV
analytical electron microscope; a 400 kV electron microscope
with a gas reaction cell for in situ oxidation and reduction
work; several 100 kV and 200 kV analytical electron
microscopes; and a whole range of acoustic and scanning
probe microscopes. Other facilities include a scanning proton
microprobe; X-ray characterization equipment; and
mechanical property testing equipment. Processing facilities
cover the whole spectrum of requirements, from industrial-
scale plasma spraying to cleanrooms for prototype device
fabrication, with polymer web processing facilities for
packaging materials and functional devices in the pipeline.
Smith outlines a future emphasis that can be loosely
arranged into three areas. The all-encompassing ‘nano’ is
unsurprisingly a top priority – more specifically the
development and characterization of nanoscale materials and
devices. Emphasis will also be placed on the hottest of hot
areas, quantum computing and nanobiomaterials. The
interface with biological science is also clearly going to be an
area of growth, says Smith. He places emphasis on an
alternative to the much-hyped biocompatible materials –
‘bioincompatible’ materials (i.e. those materials in which the
interaction with biological systems is minimized rather than
maximized). They are, he points out, just as essential as
biocompatible materials in applications such as dental
implants (to avoid the attentions of bacteria), in drug
delivery systems (so that they are not expelled from the body
before drug release can occur), and microfluidic systems (to
prevent fouling of the tiny channels). Last, but not at all least,
is materials processing. What good will all these innovations
be if actual components and devices cannot be constructed?
Incubating innovationCentral to realizing future – and current – aims has been the
Department’s involvement in establishing a new £22 million
research center in a greenfield site on the outskirts of Oxford.
While the Begbroke Business and Science Park gives the
Department room to increase its research facilities, it also
provides an opportunity to diversify, working with other
departments of the university, as well as industrial interests.
Half of the site provides much-needed expansion space for
Oxford Materials, while the rest is home to an innovation
center and various materials-related high-tech companies,
including university spinout startups Oxonica (formerly
Nanox) and Opsys1. £8 million in JIF infrastructure funding
secured the Institute for Industrial Materials and
Manufacturing, along with £6.6 million from collaborating
companies, SMEs, and government agencies. Researchers
from outside organizations will be able to collaborate on
projects with the Department’s researchers via a series of
University Technology Centres and/or Applications
Laboratories, which have already been set up with AEA
Technology, QinetiQ, JEOL, Toppan, and Luxfer.
This approach is already bearing fruit with the first spinout
from Begbroke launched in 2001. With support from Ford
Motor Company, the merchant bank Beeson Gregory, and the
university, Novarc has developed a rapid tooling process that
could significantly speed up the development of new car
models and save costs. The sprayforming technology,
originally developed by Dick Jordan (now a technical director
of Novarc), sprays molten steel onto molds to create dies and
tools for production of car parts. The huge advantage of the
process is that designs can go straight from the computer to
a ceramic cast, which is then sprayformed with molten steel.
The new process takes four weeks, compared with the 20-
week turnaround of traditional methods.
With Begbroke fully occupied already, future plans are
underway to take the site into the next phase. Once again,
Oxford Materials will play a major part. Plans include the
development of interdisciplinary research institutes focusing
on nanotechnology, automotive and aerospace engineering,
and environmental technology. As well as support for
incubators within research departments, the Begbroke
Business Incubator and Technology Transfer Unit will provide
a more structured approach.
The emphasis on innovation starts at the undergraduate
level, explains Smith. Degree courses at Oxford Materials will
now include an option devoted to entrepreneurship, aimed at
giving students an insight into the commercialization of
inventions and new technologies. Run by the Oxford Science
Enterprise Centre at the newly opened Saïd Business School
INSIGHT FEATURE
March 200244
INSIGHT FEATURE
in Oxford, the course has been piloted by the Department of
Materials. The course concludes with each student preparing
a business plan for an invention of their own, an existing
start-up, or an idea drawn from other sources such as the
Oxford University patent portfolio. In the interests of
promoting entrepreneurship throughout all strata of the
university, the course is open to staff and students alike.
Initiatives such as this should surely start to change the
impression of UK science as a source of great ideas that are
never turned into successful commercial ventures – and it is
good to see a materials department at the forefront. “I have
no shame in looking to the US for ingredients of success,”
says Fiona Reid, deputy director of the enterprise center.
“Including more alumni support, Mayfield fellowships, patient
investor money and extensive networking.” Under the
direction of Liz Miller, formerly of Oxford Instruments, the
center will “be looking to bring as many entrepreneurs,
spinout directors, alumni, and regional business advisors into
the university to speak to students, advise, attend, and
educate others at events and seminars, to provide projects,
and case study material,” explains Reid.
Increasing awareness
One of the perennial problems for science departments, and
in particular for subjects like materials science that are not
taught in schools, is student numbers. One issue that the UK
Centre for Materials Education2 has been forced to turn its
attention to is the question of attracting new students to the
subject. Oxford Materials is taking a proactive role in this
area. For some years the Department has organized open
days for schools, but recently took this one stage further with
the recruitment of an ex-school teacher to advise on student
recruitment. Funded in part by the University and in part by
the Department itself, the initiative is hoped to lead to
increased adoption of the subject in future.
Looking forward, Smith can only hope that the future lives
up to 2001, which was, he says “an absolutely unprecedented
year.” What is certain is that Oxford Materials has
established itself as a force to be reckoned with in the
materials arena, both in academic and industrial sectors.MT
March 2002 45
Fig. 2 Aerial shot of the Begbroke Business and Science Park, with inset picture showing the new facilities for Oxford Materials.
FURTHER READING
1. Materials Today, 44 (6) p.56
2. Materials Today, 44 (6), p.42-45