enhancement students’ innovation and learning skills for...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Enhancement Students’ Innovation and Learning Skills for 21st Century and Thailand 4.0: A
Case Study of Mahapajabati Buddhist College, Thailand
Phanommas Bamrungsin
Faculty of Education, Mahamakut Buddhist University, Mahapajabati Buddhist College,
Pakthongchai, Thailand;
Abstract: Currently, the 21st century and Thailand 4.0 are the crucial factor which mainly affect
graduate production in higher education institution (HEI). Both have been intensive means to create
human’s ability for competition. Thus, quality assurance for higher education, Thailand, 2015 had
provided one significant indicator which mentioned that higher education institution has to develop
effetely its students on the innovation and learning skills i.e. innovative skills, critical thinking skills,
creative skills, collaborative skills and so on. In addition, HEI also needs to produce graduates with
meet the needs of users as well. Therefore, this paper has the main purpose to study the gap between
students’ mentioned skills and the needs of graduate users which emphasis on the innovation and
learning skills for the 21st century and Thailand 4.0 in order to provide the effective strategies to
enhance students’ abilities. Five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used for collecting data from
100% of students of faculty of education and graduate users. Researcher selected Mahapajabati
Buddhist College (MBC) as a case study because it is the researcher's work place as well as it also has
to improve effectively on the students’ innovation and learning skills. Therefore, the results of study
can be beneficial to MBC and other institutions as well. Further details will be discussed in the
presentation.
Keywords: Students’ Innovation and Learning Skills, 21st Century and Thailand 4.0, Higher
education, Gap analysis
Introduction
Mahapajabati Buddhist College (MBC) is located in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand
(MBC, 2017). It is the only one female college in Thailand that is established for increasing the
equality for female students. Thus, college offers scholarship to students as a good opportunity for all
Thai and foreign female students to learn in higher education. MBC is operated under the leading of
Mahamakut Buddhist University (MBU), Thailand. It is the eldest Buddhist monastic education
institution in Thailand (MBU, 2017). MBC right now offers the 5 years program of bachelor’s degree
in education which emphasizes on teaching Buddhism and teaching English. According to the flow of
Thailand 4.0 and 21st century thereby, MBC is wakeful to cope and prepare students for both
challenging in this situation. Thus, MBC has considered in this main point especially in this year of its
operation which linked to the last 2 years of QA assessment had suggested that MBC has to prepare
and enhance students effectively for their education 4.0 and 21st learning skills. Thus, in this
suggestion researcher decides to conduct this paper in order to create the strategy to enhance students’
skills with the challenging of Thailand 4.0 and 21st century skills. Thus, the enhancement of students’
skills in Thai education 4.0 and 21st century is the major significance for impelling the quality
graduate production of higher education in now a day. Ministry of Education, Thailand and OHEC
had set the goal together of graduate production in Thailand 4.0 that focused on the enhancing
students’ skills which fulfills the satisfaction of graduate users in Thailand 4.0. They have provided
the strategy to create the integrated education among higher educational institution (HEI) and work
places and graduate users (OHEC, 2017).
However, presently the situation of Thai graduates and workers are necessary to be improved
effectively, Baxter 2017, mentioned that Thailand’s workers came short when their came to apply
their own skills which are necessary in this era such as skills of critical thinking, creativity,
innovation, technical literacy, English, and working in a multidisciplinary manner and so on. The
perception that Thailand’s workforce is simply not competent enough for an increasingly competitive,
knowledge-based global economy and education (Baxter, 2017). In accordance with those
highlighted, it has become the question of this study that “How can we produce graduates which
2
fulfill the needs of graduate users or work place in Thailand 4.0 and 21st century?” The background
of education 4.0 is from the period of 1.0-3.0 economy development. Education 1.0 had the main
purpose to produce human resource in order to serve the agricultural economy and traditional agrarian
society (Green evaluation) (University of Phayao). Education 2.0 was a revolution education that had
focused to produce graduates for working in industry especially light industry, hence to operate the
light industry, the nation had imported substitution and used more natural resources and had a cheap
labor cost and developed the nation by using new technology. Education 3.0, it had continual
developed the approach of technology used became used global network, internet technology to share
and earn knowledge for improving the learning skills (knowledge education)in order to serve the
demand of skillful human resource of heavy industry business and foreign direct investment(Royal
Thai embassy, Washington D.C., 2017).
Currently, education 4.0 has transformed globalization to the innovation’s education, the main
purpose of this education era is to produce graduates which much higher skills on innovation and
digital technology than before. It weighs on the creative and innovative thinking skills to drive and
cross over the poverty of nation for becoming the prosperity and sustainability of economy and
society(University of Phayao).The flow of this phenomenon is very strong. All levels and educational
institutions have been forced to enhance their potential by the innovative standard of students.
Puncreobutr 2017 had given the idea of the students’ innovative skills for education 4.0 which
consists of leadership, collaboration, creative, digital literacy, effective communication, emotional
intelligence, entrepreneurship, global citizen, problem-solving and teamwork. In addition, in order to
become intelligent people, students will need the skills of critical thinking, creativity and innovation,
cross-cultural understanding, information and media literacy, career and learning skills. These
necessary various skills can be the foundation of the intelligent nation (Puncreobutr, 2017).
Thus both flows of education 4.0 and the 21st century education run in relevant paths and
support each other. OHEC 2014 had provided the standard criteria for internal quality assurance in
education which HEI has to support and develop student skills for the 21st century in these vital skills
that most people view as the very important skills in this century which are: “1) The learning and
innovation skills which consists of (1) critical thinking and problem solving; (2) innovation and
creativity; and (3) communication and collaboration. 2) The Information, media and technology
skills, which consists of information literacy, media literacy and ICT literacy. 3) The Life and career
skills, which consists of adaptability and flexibility, initiative and self-direction, social and cross-
cultural interaction, accountability and productivity, and leadership and social responsibility (OHEC,
2014)”. Other than this OHEC 2006, also pushed domains of learning of the Bachelor’s degree
students that must be improved their own skills to meet the standard of the 21st century and good
characteristics of graduates.
Hence, The methods in producing graduates needs to be done according to the 5 domains of
learning of the Qualifications Framework for Higher Education, Thailand (TQF: HE) 2006 which are
“1) Ethical and moral development 2) Knowledge development 3) Cognitive skills 4) Interpersonal
skills and responsibility 5) Analytical and communication skills (OHEC, 2006)” in order to ensure the
quality of graduates and ensure consistency in standards and award titles for higher education
qualifications (OHEC, 2006). Furthermore, TQF: HE 2006 also provided and suggested the well
graduate’s characteristics for Bachelor’s degree i.e. “take initiative in identifying and resolving
problems, apply the theoretical insights and methods of inquiry from their field of study in
considering issues and problems in other contexts (OHEC, 2006)”.Therefore, it can be concluded that
the production of the graduates is as an important and challenge responsibility for HEIs in order to
fulfill the needs and compete in the 21st century and globalization. Ministry of education, Thailand has
provided the 20 years strategic plan (2017-2036) which under the vision of security, prosperity and
sustainability for Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century. The emphasized educational point is the
enhancing of graduate producing, human resource development and research in order to compete
internationally by enhancing educational standard, curriculum development, teaching-learning media
and language skills of teachers (Ministry of education, 2017).
Hence, the preparation of the nation for competition with other nations in the era of
globalization, the 21st century and Thailand 4.0. The emphasis on English skills’ acquisition was
stressed practically(Kaur, A., D. Young and R. Kirkpatrick, 2016). Thus, the English skills’
enhancement strategy is the first priority to be done for Thailand 4.0. The using of educational
3
application will be applied to improve English skills in order to enhance the standard of learning for
strengthening the quality of education. Besides this, the strategy to improve the ethics, morals,
conscious mind, life skills, civic education global citizen and so on is pushed for strengthening the
stability of the nation as well. Furthermore, innovations, research, digital technology, ICT in
education are also essential for national strategic plan for Thai education 4.0 and the 21st century
(Ministry of education, 2017). In accordance with the mentioned subject matters of ministry of
education and OHEC’s strategies and plan. The essential skills of Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century
can be gathered into 3 groups and can be offered the meaning of each skill as follows:
Group1: Innovation skills which consist of (1) Innovative thinking (2) Creative thinking and (3)
Critical thinking.
1.1) Innovative thinking means the skills to judge, consider or contemplate in order to
produce, create the featuring new methods; advanced and original (English oxford living
dictionary, 2017) such as produce new media design, application and evaluation for
learning and working (MBU-MBU, 2016f).
.
1.2) Creative thinking means emphasizes the skills of generative or divergent in positive way,
the ability to imagine or invent something new in order to improve the learning, working,
profession and so on (MBU-MBU, 2016d).
1.3) Critical thinking and problem solving means self-guided, self-disciplined thinking which
attempts to reason at the highest level of quality in a fair-minded way. People who think
critically consistently attempt to live rationally, reasonably, empathically etc. They are
keenly aware of the inherently flawed nature of human thinking when left unchecked
(The critical thinking community, 2017). Hence, the critical thinking in the same way of
Buddhist context also refers to the cognitive and wisdom skills that one can be able to
analyze the cause of problems, looking for the suitable ways to solve the problems, has an
initiative skill to fine the available approach for preventing the problem in the various and
suitable context of culture, society, background and field of study (MBU-MBU, 2016e).
Group 2: Digital and information skills which consist of (1) Digital literacy (2) ICT literacy and (3)
Media literacy
2.1) Digital literacy means the skill to selecting sources of information for research using
digital technology in information retrieval; collecting and evaluating information
qualities; analyzing and synthesizing information; writing reports and referencing;
security, effects, ethics, morals, and laws regarding media and digital technology using
2.2) ICT literacy means the perception of principles and importance of IT system and
information system in researching; usage of IT and other media in research and electronic
database in order to develop communication and online learning, researching, writing
reports of one’s research and ethics of IT usage (MBU-MBU, 2016c).
2.3) Media literacy means understand the different types of suitable method for learning to
teaching, production and selection to use media for learning, application of Information
Technology for learning-teaching, the various kinds of instructional method and different
types of natural media and wisdom media for learning-teaching, the effective
instructional media for development of the system of Information Technology, internet
and computer to help teach in professional area MBU-MBU, 2016d.
Group 3 Life and career skills which consist of (1) Adaptability, flexibility and collaborative skills
(2) Self-direction for the desirable value skills (3) Civic and global citizen and (4) English skills
Life skills means knowing and understanding self and others; rational thinking and analyzing;
systems and holistic thinking; creative decision-making and problem-solving; self-directed learning in
a context of lifelong learning; work-life balance; sufficiency in living; self-care; stress and emotion
management; solutions to life issues (SUT, 2017a) Career skills means professional abilities that
emphasizes on teaching skills with major responsibilities for learning and teaching and
encouragement of learning among learners through various methods in educational institutions at
levels of early childhood , basic , and lower-than-degree education provided by both public and
private sectors (Teachers’ council of Thailand, 2013)
3.1) Adaptability, flexibility and collaborative skills means the abilities to live and adjust
property and timely Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century’ society, social interaction
4
especially ASEAN and global interaction for the learning or working’s achievement. In
addition the collaborative skills is very crucial in this current situation, this means the
ability to work with others, collaborate with many people who may have different
backgrounds, ideas, beliefs, or knowledge in order to attain the achievement.
3.2) Self-direction for the desirable value means personal ethics and professional ethics such
as self – discipline, love and have faith in their profession, discharge their responsibilities
with integrity as well as according to TQF: HE2006 which are“1) Ethical and moral 2)
Knowledge 3) Cognitive Skills 4) Interpersonal skills and responsibility 5) Analytical and
communication skills(OHEC, 2006)”
3.3) Civic and global citizen means an awareness of ethics, good governance and
responsibility on social conscience especially one’s role and duties as a good civic and
global citizen. Understand a holistic application of ethics in society, preventing and
solving problems of corruption and building social well-being according to ethical
teachings (MBU-MBU, 2016a). In addition, understand the important concepts of
international relations; international organizations; transboundary impacts of global
phenomena (SUT, 2017b)
3.4) English skills means usage of 4 English skills which are listening, speaking, reading and
writing for learning and working in daily life such as giving information, making
summary and expressing opinions; strategies of listening, speaking, reading and writing
in daily life; citations and usage of dictionary for reading and writing based on
Information system and electronic databases (MBU-MBU, 2016b). Teachers’ council of
Thailand, 2013 presently enforced all graduate teachers who would like to be government
teacher must pass a TOEIC examination at least 400 score or equivalent of English
proficiency test such as IELT or TOFEL.
According to the essential skills above, they have shown the relevant obviously on the
necessary learning skills in this era as well as the necessary of the cooperation between nation and
international with the satisfaction of work place and graduate users. It becomes the question of this
research is “What the users need and how MBC can create the needed and skillful graduate which is
suitable for them and this era?”
Significance of the study
The findings of this research will be feed backed to the college as the significance for creating
the strategies to enhance students’ skills for Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century as well as to close the
gap between graduate producer (MBC) and users (School, educational institution and society).
Objectives of the study This study has the main purpose to study the gap between students’ skills and needs of
graduate users which emphasis on the 3 groups of essential skills for the 21st century and Thailand 4.0
in order to provide the effective strategies to enhance students’ skills and abilities for closing the gap
between producer and users.
Scope and limitation of the study
The study will scope on the students of MBC and graduate users of MBC. The limitation of
this study will be limited by the content area of the concept of Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century which
based on the educational 20 years plan of Ministry of education and latest IQA manual, 2014 provided
by OHEC, Thailand.
Methodology
Participants
As MBC has only 96 students of 2016 academic year is as a small number of student
therefore they were all selected to be participants of this research (100% of 55 participants from
teaching Buddhism program (TBP) and 41 participants from teaching English program (TEP)) from
faculty of education. Besides this, the 17 graduates who were 10 participants of TBP and 7
5
participants of TEP. There were 17 graduates users who were 10 participants of TBP and 7
participants of TEP of the last academic year, all were selected for participant as well (100%).
Instrument of research
This is a quantitative method research which used the five-point Likert scale questionnaire as
an instrument of collecting the data from participants. It was designed according to the meaning of 3
groups of essential skills for the 21stcentury and Thailand 4.0. Where they are:
Group 1: The learning and innovation skills which consist of 1.1) Innovative thinking 1.2)
Creative thinking 1.3) Critical thinking and problem solving
Group 2: Digital information use skills which consist of 2.1) Digital literacy 2.2)
Information literacy 2.3) Media literacy
Group 3: Life and career skills which consist of 3.1) Adaptability, flexibility and
collaboration3.2) Self-direction for the desirable value 3.3) Civic and global citizen 3.4)
English skills, total 10 main skills
These questions were used for assessing participants’ opinion on those skills for all 3 groups of
participant. It was tested the reliability and validity from 3 experts by using index of item objective
congruence approach (IOC), 0.67-1.00 was the range of IOC value. After finishing the IOC testing,
then it was tested again for the availability by the 8 people who were similar to participants. Then the
questionnaire was edited and improved again to be more appropriate to collecting the data.
The meaning of five-point Likert scale can be provided according to the IQA meaning which
provide by OHEC 2014, the details are as follows:
- Meaning of 1-5:
1= poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good and 5 = excellent
- Quality meaning of Mean (M):
0.01 – 1.50 urgently needs improvement;
1.51 – 2.50 needs effective improvement;
2.51 – 3.50 fair;
3.51 – 4.50 good;
4.51 – 5.00 excellent.
Research design
Procedure: Data collection
Data of this research had divided into two parts according to the sources of data were as
follows: (1) Primary data, it was collected from the questionnaire of participants. (2) Secondary data,
it was collected from the review literatures of theories, concepts, principles and research papers. The
cross-sectional approach was used to collecting the data which was in a one time period from April-
August, 2017.
Data analysis
Data analysis was done by using the descriptive statistics i.e. Mean (M), Standard Deviation
(SD) and Variance compare the data between data as a gap analysis of Mean value of current students,
graduates and graduate users with the goal good quality level from 3.51 and above.
Group 1: Graduate’s
users
Group 2: Graduates
Group 3: Current
students
Compare the
results among 3
groups of
participant
Create strategies
to enhance
students’ skills
in order to close
the gap and
achieve the
good quality
Conclusion the
3 groups of
participant’s
results and
compare with
the goal which
is a good level
6
Results The analysis results are presented in several tables and bar graphs according to 3 main groups
of participants which are 1) 17 graduate users 2) 17 graduates 3) 96 current students, the total 130
participants. The results of these 3 groups can be presented according to the 3 groups of essential
Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century skills, there are 10 main points from all groups. The results are
reported by using the values of Mean (M), SD, Variance and Quality level accordance with IQA
(OHEC, 2014) details are as follows:
Table 1: The analysis results of 17 graduate users who analyzed 17 graduates
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance Quality
Level
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.22 0.62 0.61 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.76 0.56 0.32 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.41 0.51 0.26 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.50 0.52 0.27 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.43 0.78 0.61 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.71 0.47 0.22 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 4.06 0.66 0.43 Good
2.3 Media literacy 3.53 0.51 0.26 Good
3 Life and career skills 2.89 0.87 0.76 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.18 0.39 0.15 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.35 0.49 0.24 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 4.00 0.71 0.50 Good
3.4 English skills 2.65 0.61 0.37 Fair
Average 3.41 0.78 0.61 Fair
Table 1 shows that there are 4 main points which are information literacy, media literacy and
self-direction for the desirable value and civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other
main points are in the fair level, the highest score is no.3.2 self-direction for the desirable value (4.35)
and the lowest score is no. 3.4 English skills (2.65). The average score is 3.41, fair level.
Table 2: The analysis results of 10 graduate users who analyzed 10 graduates of TBP
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.24 0.58 0.33 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.90 0.57 0.32 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.40 0.52 0.27 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.44 0.53 0.28 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.47 0.90 0.81 Fair
7
2.1 Digital literacy 2.60 0.52 0.27 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 4.40 0.52 0.27 Good
2.3 Media literacy 3.40 0.52 0.27 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.45 0.96 0.92 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.20 0.42 0.18 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.40 0.52 0.27 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 3.90 0.74 0.54 Good
3.4 English skills 2.30 0.48 0.23 needs
effective
improvement
Average 3.39 0.84 0.71 Fair
Table 2 shows that there are 3 main points which are 1) information literacy, 2) self-direction
for the desirable value and 3) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points
are in the fair level, the highest score is no.3.2 self-direction for the desirable value (4.40) and the
lowest score is no. 3.4 English skills (2.30). The average score is 3.39, fair level.
Table 3: The analysis results of 7 graduate users who analyzed 7 graduates of TEP
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.19 0.68 0.46 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.57 0.53 0.68 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.43 0.53 1.14 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.57 0.53 1.24 Good
2 Digital information use skill 3.38 0.59 0.35 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.86 0.38 0.79 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.57 0.53 1.24 Good
2.3 Media literacy 3.71 0.49 1.34 Good
3 Life and career skills 3.68 3.68 0.52 Good
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.14 0.38 0.96 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.29 0.49 1.78 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 4.14 0.69 1.68 Good
3.4 English skills 3.14 0.38 0.96 Fair
Average 3.44 0.69 0.48 Good
Table 3 shows that there are 5 main points which are 1) critical thinking and problem solving
2) information literacy 3) media literacy 4) self-direction for the desirable value and 5) civic and
global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are in the fair level, the highest score is
8
no.3.2 self-direction for the desirable value (4.29) and the lowest score is no. 1.1 Innovative thinking
(2.57). The average score is 3.44, fair level.
Table 4: The analysis results of 17 graduates (TBP and TEP)who analyzed themselves.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.20 0.60 0.56 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 3.00 0.61 0.38 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.35 0.70 0.49 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.24 0.44 0.19 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.18 0.56 0.31 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.82 0.53 0.28 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.35 0.49 0.24 Fair
2.3 Media literacy 3.35 0.49 0.24 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.07 0.92 0.85 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.35 0.61 0.37 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.06 0.56 0.31 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 3.94 0.66 0.43 Good
3.4 English skills 2.59 1.00 1.01 Fair
Average 3.31 0.75 0.56 Fair
Table 4 shows that there are 2 main points which are 1) self-direction for the desirable value
and 2) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are in the fair level, the
highest score is no.3.2 self-direction for the desirable value (4.06) and the lowest score is no. 3.4
English skills(2.59). The average score is 3.31, fair level.
Table 5: The analysis results of 10 TBP graduates who analyzed themselves.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.27 0.64 0.63 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 3.00 0.67 0.44 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.50 0.71 0.50 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.30 0.48 0.23 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.13 0.57 0.33 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.70 0.48 0.23 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.40 0.52 0.27 Fair
2.3 Media literacy 3.30 0.48 0.23 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.02 1.02 1.05 Fair
9
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.50 0.53 0.28 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.10 0.57 0.32 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 3.80 0.63 0.40 Good
3.4 English skills 1.90 0.57 0.32 Need
effective
improvement
Average 3.25 0.80 0.63 Fair
Table 5 shows that there are 2 main points which are 1) self-direction for the desirable value
and 2) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are in the fair level, the
highest score is no.3.2 self-direction for the desirable value (4.10) and the lowest score is no. 3.4
English skills (1.90). The average score is 3.25, fair level.
Table 6: The analysis results of 7 TEP graduates who analyzed themselves.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.10 0.54 0.44 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 3.00 0.58 0.33 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.17 0.69 0.48 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.17 0.38 0.14 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.24 0.54 0.29 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 3.00 0.58 0.33 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.33 0.49 0.24 Fair
2.3 Media literacy 3.50 0.53 0.29 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.71 0.71 0.51
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.17 0.69 0.48 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.00 0.58 0.33 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 4.17 0.69 0.48 Good
3.4 English skills 3.50 0.53 0.29 Fair
Average 3.39 0.67 0.44 Fair
According to the table 6, it presents that there are 2 main points which are 1) self-direction for
the desirable value and 2) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are
in the fair level, the highest score is no.3.3 Civic and global citizen (4.17) and the 2 issues of the
lowest which are innovative thinking and digital literacy. The average score is 3.39, fair level.
10
Table 7: The analysis results of 96 MBC current students who analyzed themselves.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.12 0.64 0.41 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.85 0.75 0.57 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.30 0.60 0.36 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.21 0.46 0.21 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.20 0.69 0.48 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.98 0.73 0.53 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.44 0.68 0.46 Fair
2.3 Media literacy 3.19 0.60 0.36 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.36 0.89 0.79 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 2.97 0.81 0.66 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 3.99 0.51 0.26 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 3.88 0.49 0.24 Good
3.4 English skills 2.59 0.78 0.60 Fair
Average 3.24 0.77 0.59 Fair
According to the table 7, it presents that there are 2 main points which are 1) self-direction for
the desirable value and 2) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are
in the fair level, the highest score is no.3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value (3.99) and the lowest
is no.3.4 English skills (2.59). The average score is 3.24, fair level.
Table 8: The analysis results of 55 TBP current students who analyzed themselves.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.15 0.66 0.43 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.93 0.84 0.70 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.24 0.51 0.26 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.29 0.53 0.28 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.19 0.78 0.60 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.89 0.76 0.58 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.38 0.73 0.54 Fair
2.3 Media literacy 3.29 0.76 0.58 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.28 1.05 1.06 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 2.84 0.92 0.84 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.18 0.47 0.23 Good
11
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance Quality
Meaning
3.2 Civic and global citizen 3.89 0.53 0.28 Good
3.4 English skills 2.20 0.70 0.50 Need
effective
improvement
Average 3.21 0.87 0.75 Fair
The table 8, it presents that there are 2 main points which are 1) self-direction for the
desirable value and 2) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are in
the fair level, the highest score is no.3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value (4.18) and the lowest is
no.3.4 English skills (2.20: Need effective improvement). The average score is 3.21, fair level.
Table 9: The analysis results of 41 TEP current students who analyzed themselves.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M SD Variance
Quality
Meaning
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.08 0.62 0.39 Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.76 0.62 0.39 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.39 0.70 0.49 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.10 0.30 0.09 Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.22 0.56 0.32 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 3.10 0.66 0.44 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 3.51 0.60 0.36 Fair
2.3 Media literacy 3.05 0.22 0.05 Fair
3 Life and career skills 3.46 0.60 0.36 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 3.15 0.61 0.38 Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 3.73 0.45 0.20 Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 3.85 0.42 0.18 Good
3.4 English skills 3.12 0.51 0.26 Fair
Average 3.28 0.62 0.38 Fair
The table 9, it presents that there are 2 main points which are 1) self-direction for the
desirable value and 2) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other main points are in
the fair level, the highest score is no.3.2 civic and global citizen (3.85) and the lowest is no.1.1 E
Innovative thinking (2.76). The average score is 3.28, fair level.
Table 10: The conclusion of Mean (M) of 3 groups of participant which are group 1: graduates, group
2: graduates and group 3: current students.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M of Group 1
Graduate users
(17 par)
M of
Group 2
Graduate
(17 par)
M of
Group 3
Student
(96 par)
M of
Group
1-3
Quality
Meaning
12
1 The learning and innovation
skills 3.22 3.2 3.12 3.18
Fair
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.76 3 2.85 2.87 Fair
1.2 Creative thinking 3.41 3.35 3.3 3.35 Fair
1.3 Critical thinking and problem
solving 3.5 3.24 3.21 3.32
Fair
2 Digital information use skill 3.43 3.18 3.2 3.27 Fair
2.1 Digital literacy 2.71 2.82 2.98 2.84 Fair
2.2 Information literacy 4.06 3.35 3.44 3.62 Good
2.3 Media literacy 3.53 3.35 3.19 3.36 Fair
3 Life and career skills 2.89 3.07 3.51 3.16 Fair
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and
collaboration 3.18 3.35 2.97 3.17
Fair
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable
value 4.35 4.06 3.99 4.13
Good
3.2 Civic and global citizen 4.00 3.94 3.88 3.94 Good
3.4 English skills 2.65 2.59 2.59 2.61 Fair
Average 3.51 3.48 3.37 3.45 Fair
The table 10, it presents that there are 3 main points which are 1) information literacy 2) self-
direction for the desirable value and 3) civic and global citizen can attain the good level and other
main points are in the fair level, the highest score is no.3.2 civic and global citizen (4.31) and the
lowest is no.1.1 E Innovative thinking (2.61). The average score is 3.45, fair level.
Table 11: The conclusion of Mean (M) of 3 groups of participant.
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M of
3 groups
Goal
(3.51 Good Level)
% to close a gap
(100-(M-3.51*100))
1 The learning and innovation skills 3.18 3.51 9.40
1.1 Innovative thinking 2.87 3.51 18.23
1.2 Creative thinking 3.35 3.51 4.46
1.3 Critical thinking and problem solving 3.32 3.51 5.51
2 Digital and information skill 3.27 3.51 6.84
2.1 Digital literacy 2.84 3.51 19.18
2.2 Information literacy 3.62 3.51 Satisfy
2.3 Media literacy 3.36 3.51 4.37
3 Life and career skills 3.16 3.51 10.07
3.1 Adaptability, flexibility and
collaboration 3.17 3.51 9.78
13
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills M of
3 groups
Goal
(3.51 Good Level)
% to close a gap
(100-(M-3.51*100))
3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value 4.13 3.51 Satisfy
3.3 Civic and global citizen 3.94 3.51 Satisfy
3.4 English skills 2.61 3.51 25.64
The learning and innovation skills 3.45 3.51 1.61
According to the table 11, this is the conclusion of Mean (M) of 3 groups of participant. The
goal of the enhancement is provided with 3.51 score, it means all main points are in a good level.
However, there are 3 main points that are in the good level and satisfy already, where they are 1)
no.2.2 Information literacy, 2) no. 3.2 Self-direction for the desirable value and 3.3) no.3.3 Civic and
global citizen. To present the gap between the M (Column 3) and the goal setting (Column 4)
effectively. Thus, the approach of using percentage (%) to set the priority of the skills in order to close
a gap perceptively. This is created by using the mathematic formula that is 100-(M-(3.51*100)). Then
the % to close a gap can be calculated and presented correctly. All the % of enhancement can be seen
obviously in the last column of the table 11. The highest % of all main point is no. 3.4 that is 25.64%,
that means this main point has to be the first priority for effective and active enhancement.
To present the gap of real score and goal score clearly. Therefore, it can be shown in the
figure 1 (bar graph) as below:
Figure 1: The bar graph of mean value (M) of real score when compares with goal setting (3.51 Goal
level)
14
The figure 1 shows that there are information literacy, self-direction for the desirable value,
civic and global citizen are in the satisfaction level (3.51 and above).
Besides this, when using the % to close a gap to summarize in the table 12 as well as make
the barograph of the highest % to lowest% of the skills. The highest % to lowest % means the priority
of the enhancement of those skills prospectively. The details are presented in the table 12 and the
figure 2 as follows:
Table 12: The % to close a gap of each skill
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills % to close a gap
(100-(M-3.51*100))
1 English language 25.64
2 Digital literacy 19.18
3 Innovative thinking 18.23
4 Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 9.78
5 Critical thinking and problem solving 5.51
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Innovat
ive
Th
ink
ing
Cre
ativ
e th
ink
ing
Cri
tica
l th
inkin
g a
nd p
rob
lem
solv
ing
Dig
ital
lit
erac
y
Info
rmat
ion l
iter
acy
Med
ia l
iter
acy
Adap
tabil
ity,
flex
ibil
ity a
nd
coll
abo
rati
on
Sel
f-dir
ecti
on f
or
the
des
irab
le v
alu
e
Civ
ic a
nd g
lob
al c
itiz
en
En
gli
sh s
kil
ls
Av
erag
e1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4
2.87
3.35 3.32
2.84
3.623.36
3.17
4.133.94
2.61
3.45
Thailand 4.0 and the 21st Century Skills
M
Goal
Level
3.51
15
No. Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills % to close a gap
(100-(M-3.51*100))
6 Creative thinking 4.46
7 Media literacy 4.37
Average 1.61
Figure 2: The bar graph of % of enhancement priority from the highest to the lowest skills
The 10 skills are needed to enhance perspective from 1- 7 skills which are 1) English
language 2) Digital literacy 3) Innovative thinking 4) Adaptability, flexibility and collaboration 5)
Critical thinking and problem solving 6) Creative thinking 7) Media literacy. % of gap of English
skills is much greater than others, so it should be urgently and effectively enhanced as soon as
possible. However, as mentioned before that they are 3 skills that are satisfied, those will not be
considered to enhance actively but however those should continue strengthen and remain in a good
level at least.
Moreover, when those 3 main essential skills groups which are 1) The learning and
innovation skills 2) Digital information use skill and 3) Life and career skills are compared among
themselves of the % to close a gap (Enhancement). The results can show in the table 13 and the figure
3.
Table 13: The % to close a gap of 3 main essential skills group
Group Thailand 4.0 and 21st Century Skills % to close a gap (100-
(M-3.51*100))
1 The learning and innovation skills 9.40
2 Digital and information skill 6.84
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
% to close a gap (100-(M-3.51*100))
25.64
19.1818.23
9.78
5.514.46 4.37
English language
Digital literacy
Innovative Thinking
Adaptability and flexibility in
the Thailand 4.0 and 21st
century
Critical thinking and problem
solving
Creative thinking
16
3 Life and career skills 10.07
Average 1.61
Figure 3: The % to close a gap of 3 main essential skills group (Enhancement)
According to those 3 main groups above, life and career skills group (10.70) is the first group
that should be enhanced, second is the learning and innovation skills group (9.40) and the last group is
Digital and information skill(6.84).
Conclusion and discussion
In accordance with the enhancement percentage (% of gap) in order to close the gap of the
needs of graduate users and graduate skills in Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century of those 7 essential skills
prospectively which are 1) English skills 2) Digital literacy 3) Innovative thinking 4) Adaptability,
flexibility and collaboration 5) Critical thinking and problem solving 6) Creative thinking and 7) Media
literacy. Especially the % of gap of English skills is much greater than other 6 skills, so it should be
urgently and effectively enhanced as soon as possible. Moreover, those 3 main skills groups are
compared among themselves. The comparison results have shown clearly that the group of life and
career skills is the first group that should be enhanced because the lowest score of English skills hauls
other skills in the group, the second group is the learning and innovation skills and the last group is the
digital and information skills. Therefore, the seven outstanding strategies to enhance MBC students and
graduates of both TBP and TEP, faculty of education are created, details as follows:
1) To enhance English skills effectively, it should provide the policy and mission to improve
students’ English as the first important skill and goal of education as well as should apply the English
application such as mobile application for improving students’ learning skills (Ministry of education,
2017). Thus, students can use it everywhere, anytime and anyplace that they want to learn and do
English exercises and also should provide the various extra-curricular activities/program such as
English camps, educational trips and so on. Furthermore, should arrange the TOEIC training program
from the beginning of study until they graduate, especially should encourage and require all students to
pass the TOEIC examination before graduation (OHEC, 2017). Hence, future graduates can be
government teacher as they would like to be in the future. 2) To enhance digital literacy skills, all
programs offered should integrate the teaching- learning by applying the digital using as well as create
the effective approach to assessment of the implementation results and improvement this skills,
especially the college can create the digital network with other organizations and graduate users such
as schools, universities and so on in order to have more resources and ideas to improve students on
these skills. 3) To enhance innovative thinking, this is important that it should start from the beginning
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
% to close a gap (100-(M-
3.51*100))
9.40
6.84
10.07
The learning and
innovation skills
Digital information use
skill
Life and career skills
17
of the learning until they complete the degree, in order to improve the innovative thinking, this skill
should be embedded into curriculum and extra-curriculum and all subjects as a one important domain
of learning in this era as well as continue enhancement and improvement in each year of study. 4) To
enhance adaptability, flexibility and collaboration skills, college should arrange the extra activities or
programs or educational trips that students can use and challenge their own abilities and skills to
adaptability, flexibility and collaborate with new and different environments, cultures, languages,
friends and religious and so on. 5) To enhance critical thinking and problem solving, the real practice
in a real situation from the first year to the last year of learning, thus this strategy can help students to
grow up with this important skills, students can learn and work in the school or workplace as a real
situation so they can apply their critical thinking and problem solving effectively to find the suitable
and new ways for solving the problems (Teachers’ council of Thailand, 2013).6) To enhance creative
thinking, the wider world of learning is necessary, thus the college should provide the exchange
activities with various different types of education or institutions such as Technology, digital, arts and
so on in order to create the creative thinking as well as to have the inspiration to improve themselves,
and 7) To enhance media literacy, this skill should be interweaved into all subjects of the program as
well as should integrate with the student’s training program and students’ development activities which
encourage students to use media to present their learning and potential.
Furthermore, all seven strategies will be operated effectively, first of all the creating of the right
perception, understanding and attitude of the importance of why we need to enhance student’s ability
actively is really necessary in this current education as well as the cooperation of all levels and personal
is prominent as well therefore all of these matters should be considered to building as the one major
priority. Finally the author believes that those seven outstanding strategies and right perception of
Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century will be powerful means to drive and increase the quality of future
MBC’s graduates and human resource, especially can close the gap between graduate producer and
graduate users in this era as well as can be applied to other institutions effectively and actively in order
to attain the goal of nation together which are security, prosperity and sustainability( Royal Thai
embassy, Washington D.C., 2017).
Benefits of research
This is the first research of Thailand 4.0 and the 21st century skills in MBC. It can be the
effective guideline to improve quality of MBC and other Buddhist education institutions as well as
other HEIs, graduates, enhancing employability, sustainable networks and so on.
References
Baxter. W. (2017). Thailand 4.0 and the future of work in the kingdom. Retrieved from
http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---
dcomm/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_549062.pdf
English oxford living dictionary. (2017). Definition of thinking. Retrieved from
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/thinking
Harris. R. (2017). Introduction to creative thinking. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook1.htm
Kaur, A., D. Young and R. Kirkpatrick. (2016). English Education Policy in Thailand: Why the Poor
Results in English Language Education Policy in Asia. Publisher: Springer International
Publishing, Editors: Robert Kirkpatrick, pp.345-361
Mahamakut Buddhist University (MBU). (2017). History of Mahamakut Buddhist University. Retrieved
from http://www.eng.mbu.ac.th/index.php/history-4
Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MBC). (2017) . History of Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MBC) .
Retrieved from http://mbu.mbc.in.th/
Mahamakut Buddhist University, Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MUB-MBC)a. (2016).
Curriculum (Thai Qualification Framework 2 (TQF.2)) B. Ed (teaching Buddhism program
2559). (P.32). Nakhonprathom, Thailand: MBU
Mahamakut Buddhist University,Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MUB-MBC)b. (2016).
Curriculum (Thai Qualification Framework 2 (TQF.2)) B. Ed (teaching Buddhism program
2559). (P.35). Nakhonprathom, Thailand: MBU
18
Mahamakut Buddhist University, Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MUB-MBC)c. (2016).
Curriculum (Thai Qualification Framework 2 (TQF.2)) B. Ed (teaching Buddhism program
2559). (P.36). Nakhonprathom, Thailand: MBU
Mahamakut Buddhist University,Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MUB-MBC)d. (2016).
Curriculum (Thai Qualification Framework 2 (TQF.2)) B. Ed (teaching Buddhism program
2559). (P.41). Nakhonprathom, Thailand: MBU
Mahamakut Buddhist University,Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MUB-MBC)e. (2016).
Curriculum (Thai Qualification Framework 2 (TQF.2)) B. Ed (teaching Buddhism program
2559). (P.8). Nakhonprathom, Thailand: MBU
Mahamakut Buddhist University, Mahapajapati Buddhist College (MUB-MBC)f. (2016).
Curriculum (Thai Qualification Framework 2 (TQF.2)) B. Ed (teaching Buddhism program
2559). (P.48). Nakhonprathom, Thailand: MBU
Ministry of education, Thailand. (2017). The emphasized educational policy, Ministry of education,
Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand
Office of Higher Education Commission (OHEC). (2014). Manual for the internal quality assurance
for higher education institutions. (p. 64). Bangkok, Thailand: OHEC
Office of Higher Education Commission (OHEC). (2017). The encouragement of higher education for
Thailand 4.0. Retrieved from
http://www.mua.go.th/ohec/assets/img/60-02-16(OHEC)V2.pdf
Puncreobutr. V. (2017). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. Retrieved from
http://www.stic.ac.th/ojs/index.php/sjhs/article/view/Position%20Paper3
Office of the National Education Commission (ONEC). (2006).National qualifications framework for
higher education in Thailand, Implementation handbook. (pp. 3-4). Bangkok, Thailand: OHEC
Royal Thai embassy, Washington D.C. (2017). Thailand 4.0 thriving in the 21st century through
security, prosperity & sustainability. Retrieved from
http://thaiembdc.org/2016/11/21/thailand-4-0-thriving-in-the-21st-century-through-security-
prosperity-sustainablility/
Suranaree University of Technology (SUT)a. (2017). Curriculum of general education (Revision
version 2017). School of general education, social technology institute, Suranaree University
of Technology (p.16). Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand: SUT
Suranaree University of Technology (SUT)b. (2017). Curriculum of general education (Revision
version 2017). School of general education, social technology institute, Suranaree University
of Technology (p.17). Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand: SUT
Teachers’ council of Thailand. (2013). Regulation of Teachers’ council of Thailand on professional
ethics B.E. 2556. 2013.Volume 130 Part Special 130 D Government Gazette October 4, 2556.
Bangkok, Thailand: Teachers’ council of Thailand
The critical thinking community. (2017). Defining Critical Thinking. Retrieved from
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
University of Phayao. (2017). Blue print of Thailand 4.0 Driven Model for wealth, stability and
sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.libarts.up.ac.th/v2/img/Thailand-4.0.pdf