endoscopic cubital tunnel release · cubital tunnel syndrome: studies - results setting...

27
Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release Cobb TK, Walden AL, Lemke JH, Merrell PT. Setting expectations following endoscopic cubital tunnel release. HAND. April 2014. DOI 10.1007/s11552-014-9629-7

Upload: others

Post on 06-Aug-2020

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Endoscopic

Cubital Tunnel

Release

Cobb TK, Walden AL, Lemke JH, Merrell PT. Setting

expectations following endoscopic cubital tunnel

release. HAND. April 2014. DOI 10.1007/s11552-014-9629-7

Page 2: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

2

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome:

Minimally Invasive Treatment

Endoscopic cubital tunnel release

Old Anterior Nerve Transposition

Page 3: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Surgery

Page 4: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Setting Expectations following

Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel

Release

Cobb TK, Walden AL, Lemke JH, Merrell PT. Setting

expectations following endoscopic cubital tunnel

release. HAND. April 2014. DOI 10.1007/s11552-014-9629-7

Page 5: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

5

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome:

Studies - Results

Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release

1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned to work in 1 week

Open release pts returned to work in 2 months

Improvement in preoperative signs/symptoms

Signs/symptoms Pre-op % Resolution

Numbness/tingling 94% 79%

Pain 55% 81%

Weakness 44% 86%

Abnormal 2 pt 28% 76%

Atrophy 27% 78%

Wartenberg’s 15% 65%

Cobb, Walden, Lemke, and Merrell. HAND. April 2014.

Page 6: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

6

Cubital Tunnel: Return to Work

27

17

70

0

20

40

60

80

Modifed Work Regular Work

Nu

mb

er

of

Days

ECTR

Open

Page 7: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

7

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome:

Studies - Clinical Significance

Time off work

Endoscopic benefit

Cubital tunnel surgeries per year = 73,673

Return to work 63 days sooner with endoscopic procedure

Cost savings

Daily cost of disability = $94

$94 (per day) x 63 days (RTW) = $5,922 per patient

x 73,673 cases = over $436 million per year

Davis et. al Issue Brief Common Fund 2005; CDC Sept.

18, 2013; Macario A J Clini Anesth 2010

Operative costs

Difference in tourniquet time (49 min)

Endoscopic 10 min vs open 59 min

Cost of OR time

$29 per minute

Cost savings

49 min x $29/min = $1,421 per pt

x 73,673 cases = $72,199,540 per year

Anesthesia costs

Billed Base Rate of $65 per 15 min block

Approx 45 min less time (3 blocks)

$65/block x 3 = $195 per pt

x 73,673 cases = $14,366,235 per year

Total Estimated

Annual Savings for

U.S.

= $520 million

Page 8: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of

Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release

Tyson Cobb, Blain Samuelson, Jon Lemke, Anna Cobb, Steven

Topper

Page 9: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Methods

230 cases (Females=107, Males=123)

211 patients

4 Private Orthopaedic Practices

Miami, FL

Davenport, IA

Denver, CO

Owings Mills, MD

Page 10: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Demographics

Site Total

(%)

Male

(%)

Female

(%)

IA 125 (54) 78 (62) 47 (38)

MD 70 (31) 32 (46) 38 (54)

CO 19 (9) 4 (21) 15 (79)

FL 16 (7) 9 (56) 7 (44)

Total 230 123 (53) 107 (47)

0

50

100

150

1 2 3 4

Pa

tie

nts

(n

) Number of Patients by Rank Working rank Count (%)

1-mild 131 (58)

2-moderate 13 (6)

3-heavy 22 (10)

4-unemployed 61 (27)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

IA MD CO FL

Pa

tie

nts

(n

)

Number of Patients by Site

Page 11: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Pre Op Data by Site

Compile all 4 sites or analyze each separately?

Dellon’s IA MD CO FL Total

1-mild 25 (20) 12 (17) 5 (26) 2 (13) 44 (19)

2-moderate 45 (36) 28 (40) 12 (63) 10 (63) 95 (41)

3-severe 55 (44) 30 (43) 2 (11) 4 (25) 91 (40)

Total 125 70 19 16 230

*Parentheses show percentage of Dellon’s classification by each site

Page 12: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Amount of Time for Surgery

(minutes)

Site Mean Std. Dev. Median Min Max

IA 7 3.4 7 2 18

MD 16 5.5 15 7 30

CO 21 4.9 20 15 30

FL 18 3.0 18 12 24

Page 13: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Pre Op vs. Intra Op

Subluxation Measure:

False Negative: 7 of 204 = 3%

95% CI: (1.4-6.9)

False Positive: 12 of 15 = 80%

95% CI: (51.9-95.7)

Specificity: 197 of 209 = 94%

95% CI: (90.2-97.0)

Sensitivity: 3 of 10 = 30%

95% CI: (6.7-65.2)

Intra Op Subluxation (truth)

Clinical

Observation

-Pre Op

No Yes Total

No 197 7 204

Yes 12 3 15

Total 209 10 219

Page 14: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Using Final Follow Up

Final Follow Up range

Longest was almost 5 years

Shortest was one week

Issue of Final Follow up vs. First Resolution

Rate of resolution differences (pain, NT, weakness, etc.)

Issue with this type of surgery-easy to hit

Not due to surgery not lasting, just due to how

frequently you can hit this nerve

Page 15: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

First Follow Up Dates

Site N Mean Median Min Max

IA 106 19 8 3 538

MD 70 19 11 2 159

CO 18 47 15 9 187

FL 16 24 7 0 180

Can’t determine rate of resolution until you have at least your first follow

up. These significantly increase your days to resolution data

Page 16: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Resolution of Symptoms

Numbness and Tingling

Site

Positive Pre-Op

Test Resolution

Time to

Resolution

N (%) N (%) Median Days

IA 113 (53) 96 (85) 30

MD 68 (32) 40 (59) 381

CO 17 (8) 12 (71) 67

FL 15 (7) 11 (73) 145

Total 213 (93) 159 (75) 90

Page 17: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned
Page 18: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Numbness and Tingling

Dellon’s Class

Positive Pre-Op

Test

Resolution Time to

Resolution

N (%) N (%) Median Days

1 34 (16) 30 (88) 15

2 86 (40) 63 (73) 36

3 89 (42) 62 (70) 159

No Score 4 (2) 4 (100) -

Total 213 (93) 159 (75) 90

Numbness and Tingling

Operated Hand

Positive Pre-Op

Test

Resolution Time to

Resolution

N (%) N (%) Median Days

Dominant 96 (45) 78 (81) 46

Nondominant 108 (51) 73 (68) 136

Undetermined 9 (4) 8 (89) 1184

Total 213 (93) 159 (75) 90

Page 19: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Resolution of Symptoms

Pain

Site

Positive Pre-Op

Test Resolution

Time to

Resolution

N (%) N (%) Median Days

IA 54 (44) 52 (96) 15

MD 46 (37) 38 (83) 39

CO 11 (9) 11 (100) 82

FL 13 (10) 11 (85) 89

Total 124 (54) 112 (90) 31

Page 20: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned
Page 21: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Satisfaction by Dellon’s Class

Dellon's Class

Satisfaction – n (%)

Very

Dissatisfied

1

2 3 4

Very

Satisfied

5

1 - mild 0 1 (3) 3 (9) 7 (21) 22 (67)

2 - moderate 2 (3) 2 (3) 7 (10) 21 (30) 39 (55)

3 - severe 1 (1) 4 (5) 21 (24) 18 (21) 42 (49)

Total 3 (2) 7 (4) 31 (16) 46 (24) 103 (54)

Page 22: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Pre-Op Dellon’s Class vs. Post-Op

Bishop’s

Pre Dellon's Class

Post Bishop's Ranking

Poor

0 to 2

Fair

3 to 4

Good

5 to 7

Excellent

8 to 9 Total

1 - mild 0 0 7 (21) 27 (79) 34

2 - moderate 0 1 (1) 19 (27) 51 (72) 71

3 - severe 3 (4) 6 (7) 21 (25) 55 (65) 85

Total 3 (2) 7 (4) 47 (25) 133 (70) 190

Page 23: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned
Page 24: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Days to Return to Work Normal By Site

Page 25: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Work Comp on RTW

Work

Comp N Mean Median

Std.

Dev. IQR

No 171 12 7 20 12

Yes 28 35 8 59 40

P value: 0.050

Page 26: Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release · Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Studies - Results Setting Expectations following Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release 1/2 of endoscopic release pts returned

Summary

Differences in Pre Op Data

Who they perform the surgery on

Dellon’s, sex, working rank

Learning Curve of the surgery

Time in surgery

Changes in sample population

Incomplete data; due to lack of follow up or phone call

Final Follow Up issues

Long time, easy to re-injure, lower post op scores

Work Comp on RTW