employeee motivation and organizational commitment
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
1/62
Institute of
Business Administration
1 |P a g
EmployeeMotivation&
Organizational
Commitment
A Multi Organization survey of
Private Security Companies.
INSTITUT O!
"USINSS
A#MINST$ATION
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
2/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Table of Contents
BASICINFORMAT
ON
1.
2 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
3/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Aim The objectives of this study are to:1. Determine the level of employee motivation in under survey two Private Security Companies.2. Verify eistence of any variance in motivational level of employees due to difference
professional bac!"round.
3. #plore whether employee motivation differ dependin" upon Scio demo"raphic variables li!a"e$ %ualification and years passed in present profession.
4. Correlate the predictive ability of employ motivation with the or"ani&ational commitment factor
'ethod Descriptive cross sectional study done amon" two private securcompanies. Companies were labeled as Company A$ Company )nterviewin" * +,- respondents /0 each from one company1
3 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
4/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Period of the September 2 December 3-4survey conductionDelivered data 5inal report$ table report$ database and - of 6uestionnaires.
Project 'ana"er 5ai% Ali 7han
Purpose% The primary drive for this study is to provide under survey two private securi
companies$ in particular$ and other operators in "eneral an insi"ht over the employee
motivational level$ that is to say$ in terms of various motivational theories$ where the
employees stand as far as motivation and needs are concerned. (y "ettin" the priorities of jo
motivatin" factors from employees the mana"ers of these two companies may closely !no
what their employees desire from their job in order to "ive their best. Another purpose of th
study was to !now is there any si"nificance between the two cate"ories of employees who a
armed forces and civilian professional$ and their job needs priorities. )t was also intended
hi"hli"ht the difference in motivation level as far as common demo"raphic factors li!e a"
%ualification and number of years served in the present company.
Meto'ology%A survey %uestionnaire was administered amon" the employees of the tw
companies under study to identify their need satisfaction level. A 'ulti*point 9atin" Scale /-*
was used for the -- items.
4 |P a g
(. A)stract
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
5/62
Institute of
Business Administration
!in'ings%The results eplore at what level of motivation employees of two private secur
companies stands and eactly "ives out what they need from their job or for that matter$ o
what fields mana"er wor!s to !eep their under commands motivated. The trend points alon
"ood wor!in" condition$ job security and "ood wa"es.
Practical Implication%n a broader platform$ we can "enerali&e the employee motivatio
factors of two private security companies to the whole industry thus "ivin" them a lead as
how they should mana"e their companies and what steps will lead to "reater employee
motivation and or"ani&ational commitment.
*alue%)n many local and national "rowin" or"ani&ations$ effort and finance is not invested
determine employee motivation )nde on an annual basis. This study will serve the purpose
the preliminary survey in this re"ard for these two companies in addition to providin" insi"
into employee;s needs to "et their best.
INTRODUCTION
2.
5 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
6/62
Institute of
Business Administration
and =our> sets the "rounds for the private security. The history of private person
security stretches in one form and the other$ from the ancient #"yptians to post ?@-- worl
hether it is the hired personals of +bians$ Bibyans$ Syrians and Sherdens of #"yptia
Pharaoh 9amses the ));s army or the private security "uards of ancient 9ome;s wealth
merchants. Durin" the (y&antine #mpire$ the emperors contracted forei"ners for their ow
personal security$ formin" the Varan"ion
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
7/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Abraham Bincoln for espiona"e durin" the Civil ar. =ells 5ar"o> and =(rin!s> were the ne
to follow shortly.
The first bur"lar alarm system was sold by #dwin Eolmes in -0 after he purchase
the system desi"ned by Au"ustus Pope. There is conflictin" opinion as to when the fir
proprietary security force formed. A considerable number of scholars attributes Eennery 5o
responsible to refine the concept of in house security to factory wor!ers. The era of
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
8/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
9/62
Institute of
Business Administration
+.(.(. Measurement of mployee Motivation: All thou"h employee;s motivation
an intan"ible term which can only be measured in non*mathematical e%uations$ the means f
determinin" the level of employee motivation can be both direct and indirect. Direct means a
the eyes and ears of the mana"ement which should be constantly on the loo!out for indicato
leadin" to jud"ment of employee motivation levels. As part of indirect means for measurin
levels of employee motivation$ or"ani&ations carry out surveys. (oth direct and indirect mean
have their merits and pitfalls. hile usin" direct means by the mana"ement$ prejudices li!e
and disli!es$ bossin" attitude and caterin" to the needs of a selected class can lead to wron
results. n the other hand$ indirect means can also be misleadin" unless the users of indire
means understand the re%uirements and the process very clearly and carry out the survey
and samplin" =bjectively.G The survey studies should be anonymous$ thus allowin" freedo
to employees to be honest without fear of any dama"e to their jobs. hile usin" direct mean
)nterviews with employees can "ive a feelin" of bein" intimidated$ but if done correctly will l
the employees !now that their concerns are properly addressed by the mana"ement. Survey
and meetin"s can prove to be "reat tools for identifyin" specific problems or areas$ which hav
been contributin" to lower morale of dissatisfied employees.
ne of the indiscreetly adopted methods used by companies to "au"e the employe
motivation level is throu"h immediate head;s reports. Almost all the security companies
Pa!istan are followin" the colonial hierarchy particularly associated with the armed forces
their business model as far as operations are concerned. The system implemented in suc
institutions for this purpose is confined to receive an ABB 7 concernin" routine matters
operations /employment$ shortfall$ incident H1 and administration /Beave$ overstayed person
9 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
10/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
11/62
Institute of
Business Administration
upon its overall environment$ a salary raise may be %uic!ly for"otten due to the mountin" da
stress of unpleasant job.
#mployees will feel satisfied and cared about whether their wor! environment is saf
honorable and provided with amenities. The employer must ensure for a comfortable$ clea
brea! room with basic necessities. Such primary considerations about the place of assemb
can drastically improve employee motivation levels$ and employees feel pampered and we
cared by their employers.
Above all bac!bone of employee motivation is respect and di"nity of each wor!er an
the respect for the job he performs. Due courtesy and respect must be paid to all employee
by their mana"ement in any !ind of interactions between both. #mployees must be "ive
ample opportunities for discussin" their problems with upper mana"ement and should b
carefully monitored. A"reein" to employees$ demands at all times mi"ht not be possible to th
mana"ement but every time they must be ensured that they are bein" heard and hone
dedications are bein" put in to help them.
+.(..Manager/s role in mployee Motivation% )n today;s dynamic era$ it is rath
important to identify all those factors which affect employee motivation. Companies spend a
hu"e amount of money and effort on pro"rams$ processes$ and factors that have positive
effects on employee motivation and above all trains them durin" their job hours$ thus
comprisin" upon the company8s present productivity but investin" into a future wor! force with
more reliability and s!ills. Certain such factors which will have a deep impact on employees;
productivity must be ta!en into account by the employer$ are as follows.
ob security.
9elationship between mana"ement and employee.
11 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
12/62
Institute of
Business Administration
ob benefits.
Communication channels between employees and mana"ement.
pportunities for use of s!ills and abilities.
9eco"nition of employee job performance.
ob related trainin".
Safety and security in the wor!place.
Compensation.
r"ani&ation;s culture.
Pay and related benefits.
5uture "rowth for the employee within the company.
+.+.Organizational Commitment% r"ani&ational commitment is the wor!er
psycholo"ical bond to the or"ani&ation. The reason behind conductin" these studies is
eplore means to ma!e feel a wor!er "ood about his wor!place thus "eneratin" mo
commitment and productivity for the or"ani&ation. r"ani&ational commitment anticipates jo
related variables li!e turnover$ or"ani&ational behavior$ and job performance.
+.+.(.#efinitions% There are many definitions available for the term or"ani&ation
behavior in literature. ;9eilly /-??1$ defines or"ani&ational commitment as a wor!er
emotional affiliation with the or"ani&ation$ alon" with the feelin" of participation$ contributio
devotion and trust in the or"ani&ation. This perception implies or"ani&ational commitment wi
re"ard to reco"nition of or"ani&ation;s objective by the wor!er and his readiness to achieve th
"oals /'iller I Bee$ 3-1. This "eneral eplanation of commitment relates to the definition
or"ani&ational commitment by Arnold /301 who termed it as a comparative stren"th
12 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
13/62
Institute of
Business Administration
involvement and identification of a wor!er by an or"ani&ation. Another scholar 'iller /3
also eplains or"ani&ational commitment as a condition in which an employee reco"ni&es a
or"ani&ation and its "oals and is willin" to continue the relations. That;s the reaso
or"ani&ational commitment is$ the level where a wor!er is enthusiastic over continuin" h
association for the or"ani&ation and its "oals due to personal interest and values.
Accordin" to 'orrow /-??41$ the phenomenon of or"ani&ational commitment is all abo
attitudes and behaviors. 'iller /341 eplains the term attitude as epression of favor o
disfavor of an event. Eowever /'orrow$ -??41 found that affiliation devotion and reco"nitio
are the few job attributes which represent employee commitment to an or"ani&ation. 'eye
Allen and
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
14/62
Institute of
Business Administration
or"ani&ation due to anticipated rewards /(ec! I ilson$ 31. This su""est that the reaso
for an employee to wor! for an or"ani&ation durin" this sta"e is merely what he is "ettin"
worth to him /'eyer I Allen$ -??J1.
+.+.+.+. I'entification Stage% After compliance$ the second sta"e is identification sta"
)n this sta"e$ the wor!ers start acceptin" the influence of wor!place and cowor!ers$ so th
they may have their own identity within the or"ani&ation$ ;9eilly$ /-??1. hile from th
sta"e$ employees start ta!in" pride and honor for bein" associated with the or"ani&ationK the
termed the roles they performed within the or"ani&ation as their identity /(est$ -??L1. Durin
this sta"e$ a wor!er stays in the or"ani&ation due to a sheer feelin" of responsibility$ duty an
faithfulness as to the or"ani&ation /'eyer I Allen$ -??J1.
+.+.+.,.Internalization stage: The third and last sta"e of or"ani&ational commitment
internali&ation sta"e. )n this sta"e$ the wor!er reali&ed that the or"ani&ation8s values are sam
as to his values and are satisfyin" his intrinsic or hi"her*order needs. )n this sta"e$ th
or"ani&ational commitment reflects the affective aspect of commitment /'eyer I Allen$ -??J
A level where an employee not only builds a sense of association with enthusiasm to remain
relation. The or"ani&ation and employee enjoy "reat similarities in their values durin" th
sta"e /Suliman I )les$ 31.
+.+.,.Organizational Commitment 0 1evels% 9eichers$ /-?01 defines various leve
of or"ani&ational commitment asK
+.+.,.( 2iger Commitment% This level of or"ani&ational commitment defines a hi"h
de"ree of employee commitment with complete coherence between personal and or"ani&atio
values and readiness to eercise efforts to remain associated with the or"ani&ation$ 9eicher
/-?01. Accordin" to 'iller /341$ a hi"h or"ani&ational commitment means an employe
14 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
15/62
Institute of
Business Administration
starts identifyin" himself with his or"ani&ation. The element of personnel will have to rema
associated with the or"ani&ation relates with an affective aspect of commitment in which a
employee stays in an or"ani&ation because he wants to do so.
+.+.,.+Mo'erate Commitment% )n simple words$ the moderate level of or"ani&ation
commitment is cate"ori&ed with a level at which there is judicious reco"nition of or"ani&atio
values with the correspondin" willin"ness to continue the association with the or"ani&atio
/9eichers$ -?01.
+.+.,.,. 1o3er Commitment% once an employee did not find any similarity between h
and or"ani&ation8s values and is not motivated to completely eert his ener"ies toward th
attainment of or"ani&ation8s "oal and also not enthusiastic to continue his association with th
or"ani&ation$ the employee happens to be at the lower level of or"ani&ational commitmen
henever an employee at this level of commitment "ot an opportunity may leave th
or"ani&ation. The mere reason for their stay within the or"ani&ation is$ they need to stay bein
associated with a continuance dimension of the commitment /'eyer I Allen$ -??J1.
+.+.. Organizational Commitment Management%r"ani&ations are continuous
faced by the challen"es of the chan"in" mar!et. )n order for the or"ani&ation to adapt to th
intense competition in the mar!et place and the rapid chan"es in technolo"y$ it re%uire
or"ani&ational members have to be internally committed /'iller$ 341. The or"ani&ation
then faced by a challen"e of mana"in" its employees; commitment throu"hout$ to ensu
sustainability. 8 9eilly /-??1 states that =to understand what commitment is and how it
developed$ is by understandin" the underlyin" psycholo"y of commitment so that we can thin
about how to desi"n systems to develop such an attachment amon" employees.G )t
therefore$ crucial for the or"ani&ation to first understand commitment in order to mana"e
15 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
16/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
17/62
Institute of
Business Administration
17 |P a g
3.
Research
Methodology
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
18/62
Institute of
Business Administration
,.(. $esearc O)4ective%'ajor /retired1 '. E Eussain and Captain /retired1 Amm
)sha% started F%ab Security company and Savior Security services in -?4 and 3
respectively. 'ajor Eussain started his venture initially at 7arachi$ which by now has epende
to all the provincial capitals across the country. hereas Savior Securities services are st
confined its operations to 7arachi. They both operate in selective fields of the services$ that
to say$ personal and property security with physical "uardin" only. Captain Ammir contribute
the hu"e success of early be"inners li!e F%ab Security Company to lac! of competition an
ecess of demand. There were very few operators wor!in" within the field at the be"innin" an
18 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
19/62
Institute of
Business Administration
dimensions of duty were alto"ether different$ which are now prevailin". They both !now th
positive relation between employee motivation and customer satisfaction. A motivate
employee whose "oals and objective are same as the or"ani&ation always brin"s hi"h
satisfied customers with hi"her profit mar"ins.
The increasin" competition within the field merits more deliberate mana"ement style
!eep employee motivated. They both were concerned to have a fair idea of what is the level
employee motivation at present in their companies. They were interested in !nowin" is the
any difference in motivation level and positionin" of or"ani&ational commitment as far a
employee8s professional bac!"round of armed forces or civil is concerned. They also want
!now how common demo"raphic factors li!e a"e$ %ualification and year of service in the
present companies have any si"nificance with motivation of employees are concerned.
,.+. $esearc 5uestions%
hat is the level of employee motivation in two surveyed companiesM
Does employee motivation differ dependin" upon the professional bac!"roundM
hat is the effect of followin" socio*demo"raphic variables on employee
motivationM
A"e
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
20/62
Institute of
Business Administration
security companies were conducted via a 6uestionnaire. The employee samples we
representative byK
A"e$
6ualification$
#perience in number of years and
Professional bac!"round /Armed 5orces r Civilian1
,.. Proce'ure
Collection of data throu"h %uestionnaires.
Analysis of collected data.
Preparation of results.
,.7. Population: Population for this survey will be as followsK
0 employees each of two different security companies.
,.8. Sampling meto'%
A sample si&e of - employees for the two different security companies will b
collected.
Data will be collected from employees throu"h %uestionnaires.
Total sample si&e will be -.
Avera"ely a medium si&e security company holds about 3 to 30 employees
sample si&e employees will be sufficient for our study.
20 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
21/62
Institute of
Business Administration
,.9. Measurement : Instrument selection% Bi!ert scale will be used in all the par
of the %uestionnaires$ where the format of a typical five*level item for the first part of th
%uestionnaire is:
+ot Satisfied at all
+ot Satisfied
somewhat satisfied
Satisfied
Very satisfied
As this study has to establish whether there is a lin! between employee and custom
satisfaction$ thus the same will be jud"ed by the answers of the respondents$ as they will b
showin" their satisfaction levels.
,.;. *aria)les%
Beadership.
'otivation.
9ewards and Compensation.
#pectations.
ob r"ani&ation.
Work Environment.
,.
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
22/62
Institute of
Business Administration
A+VA
Pearson product*moment correlation coefficient procedure
Descriptive analysis of factors
ur results are dependent on %uantitative analysis. All fi"ures were assi"ned numeric
values and hence data was hi"hly dependable and the research biases were eliminated. Th
followin" fi"ures represent the structure of the sample this study was conducted on accordin
to the most important demo"raphic variables.
5ualification
T
e respondents ere given the options to se!e"t appropriate age groups to hi"h the# $e!ong. T
respondents from "ompan# A are 2%&3' #ears o!d. 1(.% )* hi"h "ount seven respondents are 31&3
22 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
23/62
Institute of
Business Administration
#ears o!d. 31 of the respondents ho are ((.%) are 3%&%4 #ears o!d* there as none in the "ategor# of
and a$ove #ear age. Bi!ewise$ employees of company ( were made to choose from similar a"
"roups as of company A. Their responses areK four respondents are in the "roup of - to 3
years a"e$ 4O surveyed employees of company ( that is -3 are in the a"e "roup of 30 to 4
years. #i"ht employees a"ed in the set of 4- to 40. 'ost of the surveyed employee who is -
which constitute 4J.0O of the total belon"s to the "roup of 40 to 0L years a"e. There was on
employee epressed his a"e as 00 years.
JO employees of company A$ that is 40 personals are matric as compare to 00O or 3
employees of company (. A"ainst the none of the company A$ company ( does hold -
"uards who are under matric. Company ( does have an ed"e of one employee a"ainst the
of company A$ those are hi"her secondary or e%uivalent.
-O$ that is to say$ all L surveyed employees of company A are havin" the arme
force8s bac!"round. They all are e*service men and "ot retired from forces at different ran!
Comparatively$ 3J employees of company ( are e*service men$ and -4 are civilians.
As far as eperience in wor!in" as a private security "uard is concerned there are fo
"uards of company ( havin" eperience up to ) year a"ainst none from company A. - and 3
employees falls in the cate"ory of - to 4 years wor! eperience in the field from company
and ( respectively.
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
24/62
Institute of
Business Administration
)n reply to how lon" have you been at your eistin" job$ 3 employees replied in les
than a year$ 3 for the period of - to 4 years$ 0 for 4 to years$ 4 for to ? years and the
were - employees in company A who were puttin" on more than ? years of service at the
current job. Company ( are havin" somewhat different fre%uencies most of their employee
who is - falls in the cate"ory of - to 4 years followed by ? each in the "roups of less than
year and 4 to years$ only L of company ( employees falls in the the cate"ory of to ? yea
and there was no employee in the cate"ory of above ? years of service at their current jobs.
4.
24 |P a g
Literatre Re!ie"
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
25/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
26/62
Institute of
Business Administration
different levels. These levels are physiolo"ical$ safety$ love@belon"in"$ esteem and se
actuali&ation. The cru of this theory is$ by the time the ur"e of one level needs is satisfied o
diminishes the stren"th of net level needs increases /Batham$ 3J1. Eowever$ this poi
must always be !ept under consideration that it is not necessary that needs of a specific sta"
must be completely satisfied before a man move to net level needs but a person may yet n
be fully contented with one*level need and still pursue for the satisfaction of net level nee
'aslow believes that self*actuali&ation and e"o needs are the hi"her*level needs which cou
never be completely satisfied$ Tesone$ /301. 7eepin" in view the 'aslow;s need hierarch
Champa"ne and 'cAfee in their boo!$ 'otivatin" Strate"ies for Performance and Productivit
A
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
27/62
Institute of
Business Administration
The need for achievement can be eplained as the human need to accomplish or bein
accepted socially throu"h his abilities. Similarly$ the affiliation need can be termed as th
human desire to ma!e and maintain the associations. The need for power is the will or wis
concernin" the control and influence of the subordinates. 'cClelland observed that it would b
the need which will drive the style for mana"ement. Persons with hi"h affiliation need usua
not to perform well as mana"ers primarily because of their desire to !eep public association
At the same time$ persons that are in desire to maintain a controllable position and are low
affiliation need usually proved to be successful leaders. hereas persons possessin" th
hi"her de"ree of achievement needs$ proved successful as the entrepreneur. /9oss$ -??J1.
.(.,. A'am/s Teory% ohn Stacey Adams in -?4 proposed the e%uity theory. Th
theory is stron"ly influenced by the wor! of an American social psycholo"ist Beon 5estin"
best !nown as co"nitive dissonance. Adams /-?4$ -?01 elaborates co"nitive dissonanc
under two molds. 5irst statin" that the eistence of ine%uity will create strain and the amount
strain is directly proportional to the amount of ine%uity$ that is to say$ more will be the ine%ui
more will be the strain. The second assumption is whenever the ine%uity eists the holder w
try to reduce it. The belief is$ employee will see! a balance between their inputs or th
contributions they made and the outcomes throu"h the or"ani&ation in the forms of "oo
wa"es$ compensations$ benefits and job positions. )t is also believed that people valu
fairness$ this epectation of honest and fair treatment motivates them to !eep affairs
e%uilibrium in relation to their allies and or"ani&ation. henever an employee feels that h
input or efforts are not bein" returned in a fair and e%uitable manner the individual will try t
see! the balance by co"nitive dissonance or by chan"in" the inputs and outputs or even b
partin" with the or"ani&ation$ Carrell I Dittrich$ /-?J1.
27 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
28/62
Institute of
Business Administration
.(.. *room/s =pectancy Teory% Vector E Vroom /-?L1 presented epectan
theory of wor! motivation. The theory eplains the phenomenon of selection of certain cours
of action in an or"ani&ation special while ma!in" decision and leadership. #pectancy theo
proposes that a person will choose to behave in a certain way due to the reason that they a
motivated to pic! a specific behavior out of many available$ as the result of that option is wh
the individual is epectin" more close to their needs. Varoom eplains the motivation as th
phenomenon of selection of a certain option out of many alternatives based upon th
epectations that the selected option will result into fulfillment or at least partial satisfaction
desired need. The theory formulates the behavioral procedure as to how a person choose
one behavior over other. )t also describes how a person ma!es a decision to achieve a resu
which he values.
)n varoom epectancy model$ an individual will be at hi"h level of motivation once thre
conditions are met. 5oremost is the epectation that the person;s effort will be resulted in
"ood standard of performance /#pectancy1. Secondly$ the same very performance will en
with an outcome /)nstrumentality1$ and thirdly that outcome has an importance in individual li
/Valence1. The first condition eplains the association between effort /#1 and the performanc
/P1. The second conditions eplain the relation between performance and outcome or rewar
and the third condition valence measures the value of the outcome or reward for the individua
)n this way$ motivation can be e%uated as.
' , # ) V
here ' stands for motivation$ # is for epectancy and ) and V are for )nstrumentality an
valence respectively. Accordin" to )ssac$ Qerb and Pitt any flaw in epectancy an
28 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
29/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
30/62
Institute of
Business Administration
based on earlier findin"s that supervisor and wor!er relationship has more influence upon th
output then of any other eternal factor and productivity level may vary with inform
associations of wor!ers. #arlier in -?L two researchers Coach and 5rench also establishe
that employees who are bein" "iven the autonomy of settin" their "oals and ta!e a decisio
accepts chan"es more wilfully then those who have been denied such opportunities. Eer&be
evaluates job attitude under three conditions. 5irstly$ demo"raphic variables li!e a"e$ "ende
%ualification$ etc. were used to find the difference. Secondly$ throu"h scaled inventories
wor!er;s morale and job attitudes and lastly throu"h physical observation of the wor!er
Eer&ber" wanted to !now what actuallyK wor!ers desire from their jobs. To "et the answer f
this %uestion either method of as!in" wor!ers to "rade a list of factors in order of their priori
or to strai"ht away as! about their li!es and disli!es and then create a list of factors. Durin" h
research about the factors which affects job attitudes$ Eer&ber" found that not all factors a
same and few of them cause satisfaction and few dissatisfactions. hereas job satisfactio
and dissatisfaction wor!s independently$ thus satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not on th
continuum$ that is to say$ increase in satisfaction will not lessen the dissatisfaction. Eer&be
classification of these factors became the basis of his theory and commonly !nown a
=motivators> bein" those factors which represent satisfaction aspects and =hy"iene> bein
those factors which denote job dissatisfaction. hen we tal! in terms of profession or wo
them motivators are intrinsic in nature. These motivators may include identification$ successe
job pro"ression$ and the wor! itself /9amlall$ 3L1.)n )n the same way hy"iene factors bein
tended to be etrinsic in relation to job and may include wa"es$ personal relation$ an
mana"ement style. )n terms of Eer&ber"$ satisfaction and dissatisfaction are two differe
thin"s. 9emovin" factors causin" dissatisfaction may not increase satisfaction. )t is only jo
30 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
31/62
Institute of
Business Administration
enrichment$ which brin"s motivation at a wor!place$ by removin" factors causin
dissatisfaction will reduce dissatisfaction only /9amlall$ 3L1. )t is necessary for the mana"e
to not only remove or reduce the hy"iene factors in the job but also to loo! upon the motivato
as enhancin" motivation is the prime tas! of mana"ers. Eer&ber" study that jobs which offe
increased responsibilities$ in terms of mana"ement status could be more productive a
compare to jobs$ which offer increased in the number of similar jobs. hile an employe
performin" a job with enhanced responsibility may feel an increased sense of attainmen
pro"ression$ and identification. Eer&ber" believed that enrichment of job$ which ma!es believ
an employee to be more reco"ni&ed$ "row and achieve will increase motivation.
31 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
32/62
Institute of
Business Administration
32 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
33/62
Institute of
Business Administration
33 |P a g
R#SULTS
OF T$#
SUR%#&
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
34/62
Institute of
Business Administration
34 |P a g
5.
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
35/62
Institute of
Business Administration
mployee Motivation: The survey %uestionnaire was started with personal informatio
and then employee were as!ed to rate ten employee motivation factors. These motivatio
factors were su""ested by 7ovach and believe to be composed of both intrinsic and etrins
factors /7ovach$ -??0K on"$ Siu$ I Tsan"$ -???1. The purpose of usin" this scale was
!now at what level of motivation towards their job employees of two different private securi
stands. (esides ori"inal ten factors bein" su""ested by 7ovach$ one more %uestion: Rmoneta
incentives for a job well done; were added. The reason for addin" this %uestion was th
associated studies which e%ually hi"hli"hted the importance of compensation /eaver$ -?
9ynes$ ratitu'e for a 4o) 3ell 'one .88 .7(9
Interesting 3or? ,.8( .
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
36/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Table -: #mployee 'otivation verall 9an!in"s
The surveyed employees positioned the factor Rmana"ement loyalty to employees$;
the top. The factor is$ in fact$ an intrinsic factor$ whereas$ the followin" three factors we
etrinsic consistin" of R"ood wor!in" conditions$; Rjob security$; and R"ood wa"es$; this show
that the private security companies are not loo!in" after the basic or lower order needs
employees; properly. The factors which occupy last two positions were Rsupervisor;s help wi
personal problems; and Rpublic celebration for a job well done$; the results show th
employees want to tac!le their personal problems themselves$ and they do not li!e help. The
are also not very interested in public reco"nition for some achievement.
The private security companies primarily prefer to hire the services of retire
professional soldiersK however$ there is a hu"e number of employees who have the civilia
bac!"round. The one*way analysis of variance /A+VA1 was carried out to find the impact o
motivational variables by the two prominent "roups.
Table 3 demonstrates the results. To display si"nificance in the variable$ the variab
was measured at .0 level.
Motivation !actorsProfessional
"ac?groun'Mean
St'.
#ev.Sig.
'ana"ement loyalty to employeesArmed 5orces L.0 .0?
.03LCivilian L.?L .34
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
37/62
Institute of
Business Administration
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
38/62
Institute of
Business Administration
showed si"nificant difference is =a feelin" of bein" involved /p,.41>. +one of the employee
from either professional bac!"round "roup consider it very important factor for their job. --
e*service men employees reflect it as unimportant at all$ whereas all surveyed employee
from the civilian bac!"round reco"ni&ed it as an important factor. The third factor whic
showed si"nificant difference is =supervisor help with personal problem /p,.1>. 0O arme
forces bac!"round employees remained neutral and L-O termed it important while replyin" o
other side 0O civilian employees consider it unimportant.
The findin"s from this study show that there is si"nificant difference between the tw
employee "roups. This table is demonstratin" that armed force8s bac!"round employees ca
more about the variables R"ratitude for a job well done$; and Rpromotion or career developmen
and intrinsic factors are more important to civilian bac!"round employees.
The A+VA was carried out to compare the difference between employee motivation
factors and a"e. Table 4 shows the ratin"s of motivation factors while carryin" out the
analysis of variance for each employee motivation variable and the a"e. This study shows
that different a"e "roups had differences in their opinion about motivational factors. The
si"nificance values that were less than .0 were ="ood wor!in" conditions /p,.1$> ="ood
wa"es /p,.-1$> = =)nterestin" or! /p,.J1$> =a
feelin" of bein" involved /p,.1$> =supervisor helps with personal problem /p,.01$> and
=promotion and career development /p,.-1.> 5actors li!e mana"ement loyalty to
employees$ job security$ tactful discipline and monetary incentives for a job well done showed
no si"nificance difference.
Motivation !actors Age Mean St'. #ev. n Sig.
'ana"ement Boyalty to #mployees -*3L 0. . .J
30*4 L.3 .J3 -J
38 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
39/62
Institute of
Business Administration
4-*40 L.?L .34 -
4*0L L.L0 .- 00
0L 0. . 3
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
40/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Personal Problems
30*4 4. .JJ -J
4-*40 4.-- .04 -
4*0L 4.-4 .J3- 00
0L L. -.-- 3
Promotion or Career Development
-*3L L.30 .L4
.-30*4 3.J .J03 -J4-*40 4.J .L3 -
4*0L 4.3 -.L0 00
0L L. -.3? 3
Table 4: A+VA * #mployee 'otivation and A"e
Table L displays the employee motivation scale ratin"s with one*way analysis
variance /A+VA1 for each employee motivation factor and the variable %ualification. Th
demo"raphic variable %ualification and employee motivation factors did not differ si"nificantin this study ecept in two factors. The si"nificance values that were less than .0 were =
feelin" of bein" involved /p,.1> and =supervisor help with personal problem /p,.01$>
40 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
41/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Motivation !actors 5ual MeanSt'.#ev.
n Sig
'ana"ement Boyalty to #mployeesFnder 'atric L.3 .4?4
.LLJ'atric L. . -J
ES or Above 0. . 00
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
42/62
Institute of
Business Administration
in employee motivation variable and duration of stay at present company is bein" displayed
Table 0.
Motivation !actors Bears atpresent Coy Mean St'.#ev. n S
'ana"ement@Supervisor Boyalty
to #mployees
Fp to - year L.4 .JJ
.0-*4 year L. .0- -J4* year L.?4 .30 -*? year L.L0 .?3L 00? year 0. . 3
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
43/62
Institute of
Business Administration
Table 0: A+VA * #mployee 'otivation and +umber of years passed in present company
mployee Commitment% The net half of the survey %uestionnaire was built on th
scale of or"ani&ational commitment /C61 developed by 'owday$ Steers$ I Porter /-?J?
The or"ani&ational commitment of private security companies; employees was measured usin
nine %uestions from the reduced C6 from 'owday$ Steers$ and Porter /-?J?1.
To display the respondent inclinations in employee motivation factors$ descriptiv
statistics were utili&ed to calculate the mean and standard deviation for each variable. Th
variables are listed in ascendin" order by their means. Table shows the responses for th
study.
Commitment 5actors 'ean Std De
) !now what is epected of me at my job 4.+3 .4,%
) really care about the fate of this or"ani&ation. L. .L?3
) am etremely "lad that ) chose this or"ani&ation to wor! for over others ) was considerin" atthe time ) joined.
L.0J .L?
) am able to do what ) do best every day. L.L? .--
) am proud to tell others that ) am part of this or"ani&ation. L.L? .03
5or me$ this is the best of all possible or"ani&ations for which to wor!. L.L0 .?
) find that my values and or"ani&ation;s values are very similar. L.L- .L?L
) would accept almost any job to !eep wor!in" for this or"ani&ation L.4- .L0
This or"ani&ation really inspires the very best in me in the way of job performance. 4.? .3
Table : r"ani&ational Commitment 9an!in"s
#mployees of under surveyed two private security companies ran!ed =) !now what
epected of me at my job$G that is to say$ these participants co"ni&e what they have to do whe
they "o to wor! every day$ or we can say the wor!ers understand what their duty is. The ne
ran!ed or"ani&ational commitment value is wor!ers really cares about the fate of the
43 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
44/62
Institute of
Business Administration
or"ani&ation. The earlier studied factor of job security may have some influence on prioriti&in
this element so hi"h. The participants in this study also feel that they made a "ood decision b
"ivin" their present companies priority over other available choices. The employee
participated in the study also believe that they are puttin" their best to perform their da
dutiesK and they are also proud to tell others about their or"ani&ation. Still$ the last two ran!e
variable specifies that the or"ani&ation was not successful in inspirin" the employees to "iv
their very best$ and a lar"e majority is unwillin" for any other job within the same or"ani&ation
Commitment !actorsProfessional"ac?groun' Mean
St'.#ev.
Sig.
) !now what is epected of me at my jobArmed 5orces L.4 .L0
.0Civilian L.- .03
) really care about the fate of this or"ani&ation.Armed 5orces L.3 .L
.4LLCivilian L.0 .0-L
) am etremely "lad that ) chose this or"ani&ationto wor! for over others ) was considerin" at thetime ) joined
Armed 5orces L.- .L?-.
Civilian L.4? .03
) am able to do what ) do best every dayArmed 5orces L.L .43
.40Civilian L.- .03
) am proud to tell others that ) am part of thisor"ani&ation
Armed 5orces L.L4 .L?.J
Civilian L.J .L3
5or me$ this is the best of all possible
or"ani&ations for which to wor!.
Armed 5orces L.L0 .43.?
Civilian L.LL .0--
) find that my values and or"ani&ation;s values
are very similar
Armed 5orces L.L .L?4.JL
Civilian L.LL .0--
) would accept almost any job to !eep wor!in" for
this or"ani&ation
Armed 5orces L.3 .4??.
Civilian L.4 .44
This or"ani&ation really inspires the very best in
me in the way of job performance
Armed 5orces 4.J .00J.
Civilian L.0 .0--
Table J: A+VA * r"ani&ational Commitment and Professional (ac!"round
The top four prioriti&e factors displayed in earlier table remains unaffected here also an
showed complete a"reement between two distinct professional bac!"round employees.
44 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
45/62
Institute of
Business Administration
!nown what is epected of me at my job$ ) really care for the fate of this or"ani&ation. ) a
etremely "lad that ) chose this or"ani&ation to wor! for over others when ) was considerin"
the time ) joined$ and ) am able to do what ) do best every day remained important for bo
armed force8s professional bac!"round employees and civilian bac!"round employees. h
carryin" out the analysis of variance /A+VA1 substantial differences can be observed in thre
out of nine or"ani&ational commitment values.
The first si"nificant differences were revealed in the variable$ of =) am proud to te
others that ) am part of this or"ani&ation /p,.J1>. 'ean of employees reply belon"ed
armed forces were L.L4 with the standard deviation of .L? a"ainst the mean value of th
civilian employee8s replies of L.J with standard deviation .L3. L3O armed force
bac!"round employees showed stron" a"reement with this factor$ where as JO civilia
employees stron"ly feel proud to tell where they wor!. The net factor which showe
si"nificant difference is =) would accept almost any job to !eep wor!in" for this or"ani&atio
/p,.1>. nly -?O armed force8s bac!"round employees showed stron" a"reement with th
factor$ where as LO civilian employees stron"ly feel proud to tell where they wor!. +one
the employees from either professional bac!"round "roup consider it very important factor f
their job. --O e*service men employees reflect it as unimportant at all$ whereas all surveye
employees from the civilian bac!"round reco"ni&ed it as an important factor. The third fact
which showed si"nificant difference is =supervisor help with personal problems /p,.1>. 0
armed forces bac!"round employees remained neutral and L-O termed it important whi
replyin" on other side 0O civilian employees consider it unimportant.
Correlations
accept values proud inspires
chose
this
or"an
care
about
fate
best
possible
or"an
epected
of me
able
do be
45 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
46/62
Institute of
Business Administration
involved
Pearson .434 *.40 *.3-4 .3LL *.3 *.-4 .-4 *.? .3
Si". /3*tailed1 .- . .4L .-L .L-? .?- .-J .L?L .J
+ - - - - - - - - -
ob security
Pearson *.L3 *.-34 *.- *.-3- .3- .0-4 .? .0- .J
Si". /3*tailed1 .J .33L .3L .34 .4 .-3 .44L .-L .L
+ - - - - - - - - -
Supervisor;s
help with
personal
problems
Pearson *.30 *.3 *.-3- *.3-4 *.0 .34 *.?- *.3L *.4
Si". /3*tailed1 .-- .L3 .340 .40 .LL .3L .4J3 .LL .J0
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
47/62
Institute of
Business Administration
composed of the vertical column listin" the eleven employee motivation factors: a feelin"
bein" involved$ job security$ mana"ement@supervisor;s help with personal problems$ "oo
wa"es$ interestin" wor!$ tactful discipline$ promotion or career development$ "ood wor!in
conditions$ mana"ement loyalty to employees$ full appreciation for a job well done an
monetary incentive for a job well done$. The columns lays hori&ontally in the table display th
nine or"ani&ational commitment variables: ) would accept almost any job to !eep wor!in" f
this or"ani&ation$ ) find that my values and or"ani&ation;s values are very similar$ ) am proud
tell others that ) am part of this or"ani&ation$ this or"ani&ation really inspires the very best
me in the way of job performance$ ) am etremely "lad that ) chose this or"ani&ation to wo
for over others ) was considerin" at the time ) joined$ ) really care about the fate of th
or"ani&ation$ for me$ this is the best of all possible or"ani&ations for which to wor!$ ) !now wh
is epected of me at my job$ and ) am able to do what ) do best every day. The values of
Pearson product*moment correlation coefficient /r1 can ran"e from *-. to -..
The values are showin" the stren"th of the relationship between the two variables:
shows that there is no relationship$ while -. displays$ a perfect positive and a perfect ne"ativ
relationship will be display by *-. /Pallant$ 341. The interpretation of these values has bee
based upon a ratin"8s scale composed by Cohen /-?1$ /as cited by Pallant$ 341K th
ratin"8s scale is as follows:
r = .10 to .29 or r = -.10 to -.29 small
r = .30 to .49 or r = -.30 to -.49 medium
r = .50 to 1.0 or r = -.50 to -1.0 large
5or predictive ability$ Pearson;s correlation was done usin" the fied effect model to "
the si"nificance. The variables not predictin" the outcomes or not si"nificantly correlatin" we
ecluded. )n Table $ we can find thou"h limited but demonstrates few but si"nifica
47 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
48/62
Institute of
Business Administration
connections between employee motivation factors and or"ani&ational commitment variable
'ana"ement8s loyalty to employees si"nificantly correlates with or"ani&ational commitme
factor$ of =) !now what is epected of me at my job> Ur ,.?$ n , -L and =job security
denotes a positive relationship$ with =) really care about the fate of this or"ani&ation> Ur , .0-
n , -.
48 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
49/62
Institute of
Business Administration
49 |P a g
SUMMAR&
OF T$# R#SULTS
AND
R#COMM#NDATIONS
6.
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
50/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
51/62
Institute of
Business Administration
issues but most of them bein" i"norant of correct motivation techni%ues either ta!e them a
their industry routine use unre%uired motivational methods.
Appreciation of the problem of employee motivation is the first thin" a mana"er ma
choose to tac!le the problem. (ein" !nowin" that thou"h private security industry
dominantly occupied by e*services personnel and there is still very small share of civilians b
yet the wor!force is composed of two different !inds of the employee$ the e*service men an
the civilian employees$ mana"ers should reali&ed that bein" havin" different wor! eperienc
and routine the two different "roups have different needs..
The employees of two different companies ran!ed the factors in followin" orde
'ana"ement loyalty to employees$ "ood wor!in" conditions$ job security$ "ood wa"e
"ratitude for job well done$ interestin" wor!$ feelin" of bein" involved$ 'onitory incentives for
job well done$ tactful discipline$ supervisor help with personal problems$ and promotion
carrier development.
nce we analy&e these results under 'aslow8s need*hierarchy theory$ the number on
ran!ed motivator$ 'ana"ement loyalty to employees$ is a social factor. Positionin" this fact
at the top may be eplained as bein" eplained by 'ayo /cited by Eer&ber"$ -?0?1$ accordin
to 'ayo$ relationships between wor!ers and their supervisors had alone a "reater effect o
wor!er output than any !ind of manipulation of environmental conditions. Perhaps a probab
reason for this intrinsic motivator bein" at the top priority is in relation to be presently availab
job opportunities$ under wide*spread unemployment and economics uncertainty prevailin
throu"hout the country$ employees mi"ht be desirin" mana"ement loyalty more desperately
this contet. The number two positioned motivator$ "ood wor!in" conditions$ represen
physiolo"ical factor. The factor "raded third was job security$ is a safety factor and the factor
51 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
52/62
Institute of
Business Administration
fourth position is "ood wa"es$ a"ain a psycholo"ical factor. The "radin" of net three facto
reflect that etrinsic motivators are still si"nificant to employees.
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
53/62
Institute of
Business Administration
of the employees belon" to armed force8s bac!"round$ and discipline is their second natu
thus may not hold very important position in their needs. The two last ran!in" motivatin
factors were Rsupervisor;s help with personal problems; and Rpromotion or career developmen
this also specifies that employees of these two private security companies as far as this stud
is concerned does not want help in their personal problems from their seniors. The fact
which "rabs least importance from the participants in this study was Rpromotion or care
development$; one obvious reason for this can be as most of the samples were e*service ma
who already enjoyed first le" of their profession and promotion or career development may n
be very important for them at this sta"e of their lives.
)n order to measure the impact of motivation between two very important "roups
employees that is e*serviceman and civilians$ the one*way analysis of variance was use
'ana"ement loyalty to employee$ "ood wor!in" condition$ job security and "ood wa"e
maintained e%ual importance for both armed forces professional bac!"round employees an
civilian bac!"round employees. hile carryin" out A+VA$ noteworthy variances we
revealed in three employee motivation variables. Si"nificant difference were revealed in th
variable of ="ratification for the job well done /p,.41>. 'ean of employees reply belon"ed
armed forces were L.J4 with the standard deviation of .L? a"ainst the mean value of civilia
employees reply of L.44 with standard deviation .L0. J0O armed forces bac!"roun
employees termed this factor very important whereas only 44.4O civilian employees consid
it very important. The net factor which showed si"nificant difference is =a feelin" of bein
involved /p,.41>. +one of the employee from either professional bac!"round "roup consid
it very important factor for their job. --O e*service men employees reflect it as unimportant
all$ whereas all surveyed employees from civilian bac!"round reco"ni&ed it as an importa
53 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
54/62
Institute of
Business Administration
factor. The third factor which showed si"nificant difference is =supervisor help with person
problems /p,.1>. 0O armed forces bac!"round employees remained neutral and L-
termed it important while replyin" on other side 0O civilian employees consider
unimportant.
The findin"s of this study shows that there is substantial difference between the tw
employee "roups. Armed forces bac!"round employees care more about the variable
R"ratitude for a job well done$; and Rpromotion or career development$; and intrinsic factors a
more important to civilian bac!"round employees.
The samples were also compared for employee motivation factors and the a"es of th
samples. The employees were distributed amon" five different a"e "roups. Study revealed th
different a"e "roups had si"nificant difference in their opinion about motivational factor
Eowever #trinsic factors li!e "ood wa"es$ job security$ "ood wor!in" condition$ and moneta
incentives for job well done were rated hi"h by employees under all a"e "roups. The stud
could not find very si"nificant difference in motivation due to difference in %ualification
employee;s ecept in variables li!e =a feelin" of bein" involved /p,.1> and =supervisor he
with personal problem /p,.01.>
Alon" with the employee motivation levels$ the outcomes of this study concernin
or"ani&ational commitment of private security company;s employees will also be of some valu
to mana"ers. R) !now what is epected of me at my job$; R) really care about the fate of th
or"ani&ation$ and R) am etremely "lad that ) chose this or"ani&ation to wor! for over others
was considerin" at the time ) joined; were the first three placed or"ani&ational commitme
values by the employees. Eowever$ the factors which occupies last two positions reflects th
this place may not be the top priority for an employee to wor! at and perhaps if "ot a
54 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
55/62
Institute of
Business Administration
opportunity they may not li!e to continue their services at present or"ani&ation. +one of the
are willin" to perform any other job in the same or"ani&ation. ith a view to !now the stren"
and course of relationship between the motivation factors and or"ani&ational commitme
variables the Pearson product*moment coefficient was used. A mi of positive and ne"ativ
relationship were found between these motivation and commitment variables. e !now th
or"ani&ational commitment and employee motivation "o side by side$ "enerally a committe
employee is a motivated wor!er. 'otivation factors li!e job security and mana"ement loyalty
employee displays positive relation with R) am proud to tell others that ) am part of th
or"ani&ation.; This is a constructive relation and displays employee;s attachment to the
or"ani&ation. The Pearson product*moment coefficient analysis thou"h at moderate level b
confirms correlation of employee motivation factors with or"ani&ational commitment indicators
$ecommen'ation% The above presented results implies mana"ers to me
physiolo"ical needs by offerin" a fair competitive wa"e$ brea!s with in assi"nments$ an
recreational allowances li!e tea allowance etc. so that the employee feels comfortable that h
basic needs are satisfied. +et$ a company can ensure off course to an etent that the wo
facility is safe and he has been so e%uipped not only to !eep himself safe but also to h
concerns. The company can also have a fair pro"ressive discipline policy ensurin" jo
security. Also$ the mana"ers can encoura"e employees to participate on wor! teams and@
sponsor informal "atherin"s so employees may sociali&e to help meet their social needs.
rewards and reco"nition pro"ram for "ood performance$ perfect attendance$ and simil
pro"rams could help satisfy the employee;s esteem needs. 5inally$ to help satisfy employee
self*actuali&ation needs$ companies can offer in*house development$ or offer reimburseme
for tuition or relevant fees for hi"h achievements of their children. There are many possibilitie
55 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
56/62
Institute of
Business Administration
for applyin" these needs to drive wor!er8s motivation. )t may not always be very clear wh
needs to be done$ but this is why it8s important for mana"ers to understand these need
theories and be able to reco"ni&e the employee needs and apply appropriate tools to enhanc
motivation.
56 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
57/62
Institute of
Business Administration
57 |P a g
Conclsion
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
58/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
59/62
Institute of
Business Administration
)t really does not matter under which scholar;s perception we "au"e the wor!forc
motivation level$ in one way or other$ security constitute the basic need of human bein"s.
"ood job not only secure etrinsic needs of an employee but also provide opportunities to fulf
intrinsic needs which actually helps an employee to "et motivated and "ive his whole hearte
efforts for the betterment of the or"ani&ation. The mana"ers should not only ta!e care
employees; salaries$ compensations$ safety and security but also create an environment whic
flourish the attainment of synchroni&ation between personal and or"ani&ation;s "oal. Althou"
!eepin" in view the present economic condition of the country pay and bonuses have
definite positive impact on the motivation and commitment of an employee and whenev
occasions permits the same should be "ranted$ but this point should always be !ept in min
that money is not the conclusive solution of every problem$ )t is the overall environment of th
wor!place which re"ulates motivation and commitment level of an employee.
$eferences%
59 |P a g
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
60/62
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
61/62
Institute of
Business Administration
9ynes$ S.B.$
-
8/12/2019 Employeee Motivation and Organizational Commitment
62/62
Institute of
Business Administration
How important is eac o! te !ollowing !actors !or "ou#
1 2 3 4 %
A ob where you feel bein" involved
ob securitySupervisor;s help with personal problems