emerging people themes academic planning committee 5 march 2010
TRANSCRIPT
Emerging People Themes
Academic Planning Committee5 March 2010
Emerging People Themes
• International– Sustainable working practices – Mindset
• Attraction & Retention• Culture of Performance for all• Succession, Flexibility and Development
– Academic Succession– Career options for non academic Faculty staff (& CS)– Flexibility– Development
• Ethical Environment– Workload allocation / Workplace pressures / Maintaining wellbeing – Inclusive, respectful working practices
International“We will continue to develop an international mindset as the cultural norm
at Lancaster.”
What we know Growing number of
International Partnerships
What this implies? Review how we manage
International Partnerships Review how the International agenda is
staffed/enabled Changes to workload
models/employment contracts Partner institutions require long-term
development of staff to be embedded
What we know Working and collaborating
internationally requires a different skill set and mindset Remote team working Management of remote
activities Buy-in to an International
way of operating
What this implies? Up-skilling
Staff involved in teaching using ‘remote’ delivery techniques
Staff involved in the management of activities/relationships
Cultural shift Communication of rationale
for shift (& implications if no change)
Additional focus on mindset through PDR/other mechanisms
Incentives (pull) for adopting new way of operating?
International“We will continue to develop an international mindset as the cultural norm
at Lancaster.”
InternationalQuestions
What specific initiatives would enable changes to ways of working in support of the International agenda? E.g... Changes to terms and conditions of employment Stipulating ‘experience of working internationally’ when recruiting to grade 8+ roles?
How can we best support the development of skills that are required for international working? What skills will be required?
How could staff be encouraged/enabled to develop an international mindset?
What we know Institutionally we want to
increase proportion of staff recognised as world class in their fields. However, sometimes difficult to attract right calibre of staff Scarcity of top talent Top talent can demand
salary premiums/more substantial benefit packages
Poaching of ‘star performers’ is an ongoing threat for the very talented
What this implies? Additional focus to ensure
consistently high quality candidate experience both through the recruitment process and thereafter
Less reliance on probationary periods, greater focus on selection methods and appointment decisions
Support, development and management to enable people to lift their performance to world class standard
Attraction & Retention“We will attract and retain high quality staff, and increase the number of
world-leading researchers.”
What we know Our ability to retain the
very top talent is dependent on meeting their expectations The current challenges
around managing the workload/focus for the academic population as a whole are even more relevant for this group
What this implies? Need to better understand
our ‘attraction power’ both institutionally and within each department Better articulate what
we offer Better fulfil the
promises that we make
Attraction & Retention“We will attract and retain high quality staff, and increase the number of
world-leading researchers.”
Attraction & RetentionQuestions What more can we do to enhance the candidate experience? What are likely to be the top five attractors for top academic
talent to come to Lancaster? (Our Employer Brand?) What are the five most important retention factors for top
academic talent to stay at Lancaster?
Culture of Performance for all“We will create a performance based culture by rewarding initiative and by
ensuring a high standard of performance from all staff.”What we know Generally career advancement as
an academic is dependent on performance against key criteria Research Research publications Citations Secure funding
For non academic staff, the landscape is very different, less prescription/obligation to deliver against set criteria. Suspicion that not everyone is performing Demands placed on staff mean that
everyone is now expected to work at a higher level.
Limited number of people with experience /comfort around managing poor performance
What this implies? May be some pockets of the
institution that require new approaches/new emphasis in order to fulfil culture of ‘Performance for all’
Culture of Performance for allQuestions
The Strategic Plan states reward will be related to achieving high standards. What processes should be put in place to achieve this?
Staff survey feedback suggests we are not doing enough to manage under-performance. Do we have the management capability to manage under-performance? Faculty/Rotating HoD’s Non-Faculty/Central Services
Succession, Flexibility & Development
What we know Career progression
opportunities for non academic Faculty staff (& CS) can be limited
What this implies? University needs to develop
appetite for taking some controlled risks in appointment decisions Getting better at articulating
and identifying those with ‘potential’ to work in new areas/higher levels
Getting more comfortable with notion of transferrable skills
Moving away from insistence on deep functional knowledge
Succession, Flexibility & Development
What we know Overall organisational
headcount has tended to be heavily influenced by history – rather than led by strategic requirements
Analysis of VC’s Office, Faculty Deans, Distinguished Professors, Directors in Central Services and Non-Faculty shows 30 out of 50 post-holders will reach NRA during current Strategic Plan.
What this implies? We need to continue to deploy
resources efficiently in support of agreed priorities Get better at making ‘tough
decisions’ Develop more capacity in
managing organisational change
Planning for succession needs greater focus
Succession, Flexibility & Development
What we know Development of staff vital
to ensure the University and individuals grow and adapt to changing landscape
Staff need to be continuously encouraged to develop/adopt new innovative teaching methods – especially as the sector changes
What this implies? New/innovative training &
development opportunities targeted towards specific populations
Resource requirement to fulfil commitment to development
Rewards/incentives for development & exceptional performance Teaching Innovation
Succession, Flexibility & DevelopmentQuestions
What will help more of a “promote from within” approach to key non academic posts? Should we have targets around % external recruitment vs “growing our
own”? Flexibility – How do we enhance capability in managing organisational
change? How should we develop a process for Succession Planning?
Where is the greatest need - Faculty/Non-Faculty/Central Services? What would it look like?
What more should HR be doing to develop the leadership capability of rotating HoD’s (especially when some are reluctant to take on the role?)
Ethical Environment“We will provide an ethical environment and sustain a healthy and safe
place to work.”
What we know “Stress” is the single biggest
cause of days lost at the University
Some evidence of harassment/ too many grievances?
Efforts to effectively manage performance sometimes labelled as “Harassment”?
What this implies? Recommendations from
workplace stress audits need to look more deeply at the ways of operating that contribute to stress
Some more traditional ways of managing are no longer acceptable
More emphasis on coaching style and informal resolution
Questions
What should be the key areas of focus for the newly appointed Manager of Wellbeing, Equality and Diversity?
Do we know what we mean by workplace bullying and harassment?
Ethical Environment
Final thoughts, to take People agenda forward...
Need for scope of HR to be re-thought to allow progress on these broader issues?•Requires stronger collaboration with Faculties to help resolve Faculty/academic challenges, as well as Non-Faculty and Central Services
Need for HR to operate differently•Requires move away from operational focus in favour of strategic focus (and planning for the future)
GroupsGroup 1• Paul Wellings• Sue Cox• Fiona Aiken • John Gallagher• Colin Lambert• David Otley• Emma Rose• Steve Miller
Group 2• Mandy Chetwynd• Gavin Brown• Mark Swindlehurst• Anthony Marsella• Tony Gatrell• Mary Smyth• Steve Bradley• Michael Payne• Jane Taylor
Group 3• Bob McKinlay• Andrew Neal• Roderick O’Brien• Clare Powne• Geraint Johnes• Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad• Peter Elliot• Fiona Benson
Group 4• Trevor McMillan• Lesley Wareing• Sarah Randall-Paley• Tom Finnigan• Paul Graves• Ellie Hamilton• Tony McEnery• Awais Rashid• Mark Easterby-Smith
Group 1 Questions - International What specific initiatives would enable changes to ways of working in
support of the International agenda? E.g. Changes to terms and conditions of employment Stipulating ‘experience of working internationally’ when recruiting to
grade 8+ roles? How can we best support the development of skills that are required for
international working? What skills will be required? How could staff be encouraged/enabled to develop an international
mindset?
Group 2 Questions - Attraction & Retention
What more can we do to enhance the candidate experience? What are likely to be the top five attractors for top academic
talent to come to Lancaster? (Our Employer Brand?) What are the five most important retention factors for top
academic talent to stay at Lancaster?
Group 3 Questions - Culture of Performance for all
The Strategic Plan states reward will be related to achieving high standards. What processes should be put in place to achieve this?
Staff survey feedback suggests we are not doing enough to manage under-performance. Do we have the management capability to manage under-performance? Faculty/Rotating HoD’s Non-Faculty/Central Services
Group 4 Questions - Succession, Flexibility & Development
What will help more of a “promote from within” approach to key non academic posts? Should we have targets around % external recruitment vs “growing our
own”? Flexibility – How do we enhance capability in managing organisational
change? How should we develop a process for Succession Planning?
Where is the greatest need - Faculty/Non-Faculty/Central Services? What would it look like?
What more should HR be doing to develop the leadership capability of rotating HoD’s (especially when some are reluctant to take on the role?)
What should be the key areas of focus for the newly appointed Manager of Wellbeing, Equality and Diversity?
Do we know what we mean by workplace bullying and harassment?
All Groups - Ethical Environment