ellenbrook public environmental review tables & …

ELLENBROOK MANAGEMENT PTY LTD

ELLENBROOK PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

TABLES & DIAGRAMS

Volume 2

711.58( 941)

1111111 1$~ ii

Feilnian Planning Consultants

FEI CopyA Vol 2 I 920277/2

Department of Environmenta' Protection Library

Table 1

Lexia Scheme Groundwater Scheme INCLUDED Groundwater Scheme EXCLUDED

Conservation Area 90 ha 410 ha 90 ha 410 ha

WATER LOAD (Mm3)

Catchment: Northern 0.9 0.7 1.3 1.0

Southern 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

Eastern 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

3,1 2.9 3.5 3.2 TOTAL

0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 If No Intercatchment Pumping Increase by

If State Forest Excluded Decrease Load by 0.1 0.2

P EXPORTED (kg)

Catchment: Northern 20 19 46 44

Southern 7 7 8 8

Eastern 10 10 10 10

37 36 64 62 TOTAL

If No Intercatchment Pumping Increase by 5 5 14 15

If State Forest Excluded Decrease P by 1 4

P RETAINED (kg)

Catchment: Northern 105 98 339 316

Southern 66 68 75 77

Eastern 35 35 35 35

206 201 449 428 TOTAL

If No Intercatchment Pumping Increase by 5 5 14 16

7 26 If State Forest Excluded Decrease P by

Fcilrnan Planning Consultants/G.B. Hill & Partners

TABLE 2 I ELLENBROOK DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC OUTPUT

Lot Construction Dwelling Construction Year No. of Lots Direct

Expenditure 1st Round

111$M Subsequent

III $M Total

Output No. of

Dwellings Direct

Expenditure 1st

Roundt11 Subsequentl'I Total

Output $M

1993 300 7.5 3.72 3.20 6.9 300 13.5 6.7 5.8 12.5

1994 620 15.4 7.7 6.6 14.3 620 27.9 13.0 11.9 24.9

1995 1040 25.8 12.9 11.1 24.0 1040 46.8 23.4 20.1 43.5

1996 1500 37.3 18.6 16.0 34.6 1500 67.5 33.7 29.0 62.7

1997 1500 37.3 18.6 16.0 34.6 1500 67.5 33.7 29.0 62.7

1998 1500 37.3 18.6 16.0 34.6 1500 67.5 33.7 29.0 62.7

1999 1500 37.3 18.6 16.0 34.6 1500 67.5 33.7 29.0 62.7

2000 1500 37.3 18.6 16.0 34.6 1500 67.5 33.7 29.0 62.7

2001 1500 37.3 18.6 16.0 34.6 1500 67.5 33.7 29.0 62.7 2002 1600 39.7 19.8 17.0 36.8 1600 72.0 36.0 30.9 66.9

2003 1600 39.7 19.8 17.0 36.8 1600 72.0 36.0 30.9 66.9

2004 1 1600 39.7 19.8 17.0 36.8 1600 72.0 36.0 30.9 66.9

2005 1600 39.7 19.8 17.0 36.8 1600 72.0 36.0 30.9 66.9

2006 1600 39.7 19.8 17.0 36.8 1600 72.0 36.() 30.9 66.9

2007 1600 39.7 19.8 17.0 36.8 1600 72.0 36.0 30.9 66.9

TOTAL 20560 510.7 254.7 218.9 473.6 20560 925.2 461.3 397.2 858.5 Total Direct Expenditure $510.7 Total Output $473.6

Total Direct Expenditure $925.2 Total Output $858.5

TABLE 3 I ELLENBROOK DEVELOPMENT EMPLOYMENT CREATION

Lot Construction Dwelling Construction Totals

Year No. of Lots

Direct [All

Indirect [Bli

No. of Dwellings

Direct

IA21

Indirect

[132]

[Al+A2] [131+1321

1993 300 63 56 300 114 102 177 158 1994 620 130 117 620 236 212 366 329 1995 1040 219 196 1040 397 355 616 551 1996 1500 316 283 1500 572 512 888 795 1997 1500 316 283 1500 572 512 888 795 1998 1500 316 283 1500 572 512 888 795 1999 1500 316 283 1500 572 512 888 795 2000 1500 316 283 1500 572 512 888 795 2001 1500 316 283 1500 572 512 888 795 2002 1600 337 302 1600 610 546 947 848 2003 1600 337 302 1600 610 546 947 848

2004 1600 337 302 1600 610 546 947 848

2005 1600 337 302 1600 610 546 947 848

2006 1600 337 302 1600 610 546 947 848

2007 1600 337 302 1600 610 546 947 848

TOTAL 20560 4330 3879 20560 7839 7010 12169 10896

Elleabrook Tran.secL

Al

A2

A3

A4

AS

7ype C1assificaion of Wetland A/kr Senteniuk et aL, 1990

sumpland micro concentriform open forest/closed heath/closed sedgeland

dampland meso maculiform open forest/closed heath/closed sedgeland

sumpland micro maculiform open forest/closed heath/closed sedgeland

sumpland micro zoniforin closed heath/closed sedgeland

dampla. I macro maculiform forest/closed heath

Table 4

CLASSIFICATION OF THE VEGETATION OF SOME TYPICAL WETLANDS OF THE ELLENBROOK PROJECT AREA

Ri sumpland micro concentriform forest/closed heath/low, woodland/closed sedgeland

Cl seepage lepto maculiform open woodland/closed heath

Dl seepage meso maculiform woodland/open woodland

El dampland lepto latifbrm closed heath

Fl sumpland micro concentriform forest/closed woodiandiclosed heath/closed sedgeland

Gi sumpland lepto concentriform open forest/closed heath/closed sedgeland

HI sumpland micro concentriform forest/dosed heath/closed sedgeland

II sumpland lepto concentriform open woodland/closed scrub/closed sedgeland

Ji dampland micro betero(orm closed low forest/closed 8edgeland/closed heath

Ki dampland micro concentriform open forest/dosed heath/closed sedgeland

Li dampland lepto maculi(brm closed low forest/closed scrub

Ml sumpland micro gradiform closed sedgeland/closed saub

Ni sumpland lepto concentriform closed woodland/dosed heath/closed sedgeland

Inue4tlory afA sembl4ges

Melaleuca psiasaIAstorea fascicularu/Bouni.ea ariiculata

Melakuaa preissio.nalHypocalymma angus4folium IAsto,rea (ascicuiaris-Baumea articu Iota

Melakuca preissianalPerica!ymma ellipticum lAxtartea fascicuiari.s/Baurnea articuIoa

A.starteo fascicularis/Baumse articu/ata

Melaleuca rhaphiophylla IPeria.i1ymina ellipticumlAztartea fascicuiarislEucalyptus spp.-Banksia app.'

Hypoca1yin,rsa aiigusti[olium/ Banksia littoralie/M. preissiana/Baumea acuta/Astartea fascicularis.Pericatyrarna ellipticum/Baumea artcuIata

M. preissianalA. fascicularis.Lepidosper,na ep.

B. littorolis-M. preissiwsa/E. rudis

Eremaea paucifzora

Metaleuca preissiwza/Bonksia lil&,r&&s. Lepidosperma gladiatum/ A. [ascicularis/ Bawnea acuta/B. orticulata

Melakuca priana.Hypocalymma wsgusti[oliuni /B.aurnea acuta lAstartea fascicuioris/B. art icu lata

Melaleuca preiuiaisalHypocalymma angusti(olium/Astartea (aacicuiaris/Baunseo art icu1ata

Banksia UuomlislAgtartea fascicuiaris/ Pericalymma ellipticum/Bawnea o.cuta/B. atticuiata

Banksia iitioroj.iz/Baumea acuta/Periaüymma ellipticum

MeIø.kuca preisuona-Banksia IUoraiis/C.ajotAwnnus kteroiie-Astargea fascicularis

Banküa IiUoraiislMelaleucc tereti(ojja.M. polygaloides

Baumea acuto ILepidosperina longitudinaZelMelakuca teret4folia.Astartea facicularis/Bauntea o.rticutata

M. preissiana-Banksia littorojis/Astartea fascsculorjg/Baunseo ocuta/Meloleuco iotritja/Baumeo articulata

The varioua assemblages are separated by a alash (I'): Di(Ierent specea which cecur within the same assemblage are separated by a dash (-). For descriptions of the floristics of the wetlands see Appendix A. This assemblage contains a mixture of woodland and wetland species.

DAMES & MOORE

G h 1 Per Annum Output Creation rap

Lot & Dwelling Construction

$ Million 120 110 i g ]

80 - 70 - 60-

40

10

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Lots - Dwellings - Total

Cumulative Output Creation Graph 2

Lot & Dwelling Construction

S Million 1400 1300 - 1200 - 1100 - 1000-

II 400 300 2001 -

100 I I I I I I

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Lots Dwellings Total

Feilman Planning Consultants/Housing Industry Association

'Graph 3 Per Annum Employment Creation Total Lot & Dwelling Construction

No of Jobs 2000

1750 , .

1500

1250'

500 -

250

0 ' I I

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

- Direct Employment —i--- Indirect Employment Total

Gra h 4 Cummulative Employment Creation Total Lot & Dwelling Construction

25000- No of Jobs

20000-

15000-

i:::o

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 1993 ' 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Direct Employment —i-- Indirect Employment IK Total

Feilman Planning Consultants/Housing Industry Association

Feilman Planning Consultants

MARALCA ROAD

MT LAWLEY

SANVA VINES ? ty =iT \Pty Ltd \ '

CROWN LAND

HOMESWEST \\\\\\

.- S.E.C. W . A\

U

PINE PLANTATION : (STATE FORE

rn in

1------i \

ELLENBROOK DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY

........ ......... OWNERSHIP BOUNDARY

\ \I ......... PROPOSED URBAN ZONING

kc\I-.I PROPOSED REGIONAL OPEN SPACE ZONING (Conservation Area)

AREA PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT & LAND OWNERSHIp

Figure 1

I

SOURCE: METROPLAN REPORT PRODUCED BY D.P.U.D. METROPLAN


SCALE 10

kornrii)5

A\ \\\ wO I \\\\\\

h Joond lup 00

/ZO .*ELLENBROOK\N\ INDIAN

Morley Midland

Stir hng 0 -

OCEAN • Peh

1 • ;annin

Fremantle

. :7FI-

%: :

0

/

}Aima

/o cc cc

Rockim °

- Cl)

LEGEND

LIII Urban Rural/Non-Urban (I) Airports

Future Urban Groundwater Catchment ' Harbours

Region Open Space Surface Water Catchment - Major Road System

Major Industry Proposed Surface Water Catchment

u'... Railway

Escarpment Protection • Strategic Regional Centre 4 Future Urban Growth Option

METROPLAN 1990: METROPOLITAN STRATEGY

Bj METROPLAN

Figure 2

T

E

'i33dd

14

cc avO

w

cc IL

Ul

C

)

cc —

S

I

OK

O

4I

) -

I.

)•.'

- 2

-

SI

)

Lj

) )

4

I

(J

A

'ck

v.

(2

& )

*

•

-

1 I

) • )(

J4

-

4 *

;

-)

I

:

4

-

AL Li

- 3

W

4

)

IIINY

1

j •1

)

( -

)

30

/\ R

WE

R

I

z

z

0

I.- 0

0

I.j

I

.SOURCE: URBAN EXPANSION REPORT PRODUCED BY D.P.U.D.


PERTH. WESTERN AUSTRALIA

-

------

---------------

1.8

"A~ 10 10

ir

Ji

Ii

A,

s' 22

.-

-

—j---,°' C

—

31

Allumos

S. Neerabup

- 9 Landodale / 10. lanceai.

0....! It. Befirue

— -r' 12. LipperSw.o

--C. ., ,•

13, Henley Brook - ¶4. Henley Brook

— \

39 I 15 Beeclrboro

— 16. kBl.rrdon

0 - 17. Hero. Hill

. .

Midde Swan WexCOnrbe

.Roeetriil

. 21. Helena Valley 22. High Wycombe 23. MaideVale 24. ForrietSeld - West

-_ 25. FOrTenSQId Wattle Grove Martin Casotltrg Vale C.rrrrirrg Vale Southern River

METROPOLITAN REGION SCHEME ZONES LAND SUITABLE FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT 31. Armadele

[J Urban Special Indus Industrial end Raiways and Category A—Ralaliv.lv Unco.rgtreined tar Development 32. Wungong

trial Port ln.rali.tlorra Movement of Development Front 33. Byfotd

Urban Deterred [J Rural Category B—Constreinte to Development

Central City Area [J Public Purposes [J Store Foreate £ Major New Intlustlial Areas 36, Thomson. Lake

- - - Metropolitan Controlled Access Important Regional 37, Mandea1uP

Region Sc,eme and 0th.. Major "" Road. 38. Parmeba

Boorrdary Highways 39. BalcEvia 40. Kamup

URBAN EXPANSION POLICY

4rNO ~~k fl Y) I-

Figure 4

URBAN EXPANSION POLICY CATEGORY A. LAND

Figure 5

/

-

j - - -

- -

- ='I -.--'--'- -- - - ______i - ±I•$---

Feilman Planrilno Consultants

I

BJ?

CURRENT SHIRE OF SWAN ZONING

1-i-I 1 Figure 6A


CURRENT METROPOLITAN REGION SCHEME ZONING

Figure 6B


.,

r t jr- - -- a.- .• -.-r- . - &_ i. .s. ,.- - -

•1' 5

I

—j rFARMLAND

-

-

S. 5 :- ..S

.• -.

PINE I

PLANTATION - BANKSIA 1 — 'iWOODLAND-

1 ' ' 5SS 5' \ .

- \

- S..-. \

.

S •5 5 . - -. - . ---•...

'55S

- :-- s I.) . S...Sz S - JI7N

II 7.- THE i'

1 VINES " 1RESORT

.- •\... . - _.X5._ . -' .--- s.-'. . .-,

- ' — -- - .--'-- '

- — -- —i.--

q. PIN PLANTATION

'-±'--- /

X.

A. PINE PLANTATION

F r 1 7

:t

'S4.4SAND QUARRIES

.a. . ... --

-5' -5 -

— ç..5 -

..:t•$ -, -

Ob

WHITEMAN PARK

j r

— S SPECIAL RURAL h

BJ?

EXISTING LAND USES

Figure 7

IGHW

GR

EA

T

EL

-j

-

-------------------- LU

-

9

all

RO

AD

'I)

0

1.1 z 0

()

z 0

I

w

0

0

Co

Figure 9

DRAINAGE PATTERNS

PINE PLANTATION

- --- -- I -

SOURCE: DAMES & MOORE Feilman Planning Consultants

Sawpit Gully -

(•. .1 r-. 0 (-• •

I - ariksia'woodland I'

7 /Dç'

LEGEND

f WETLAND

ç.j VARIOUS TYPES OF DAMPLAND

Bj?

VEGETATION MAP

Figure 10

SOURCE: E.P.A. reiman ruannIrg oiiuitii

-----------------

-411

-- \\

iLLL tLL

( 4 Bj

~ 44,~-kk I o

LAKES AS DEFINED BY E.P.A. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY

Figure 11


It

FT

PROPOSED RESERVATION

Figure 12


SOURCE: W.A.W.A.

------------

w I \J

U

WANNEROO GWs

• U • .

• STATE

FOREST

No. 65 Io

-;o. MIRRASOOKA

UWPCA & PWSA

PAW

___.c.p/, •--.-7 \\\ f

/ . I

c

53C ';\ (

SWAN \\\ GROUNDWATER .__.__\ \\\ .'

AREA

terco Spp1v Bore

Sauce1

State Forest Bourdary

- — Surface Draunoce

Monstorung Bore

PropOsed Lexie Schere Bore

Bj

EXISTING MONITORING BORES

AND PROPOSED LEXIA BOREFIELD

Figure 13

SOURCE: G.B.HILL & PARTNERS Feilman Planning Consultants

SKETCH OF DETENTION BASIN

BASINS 10 BE SIZED TO ATTENUATE STORM FLOWS, TO REDUCE THROUGH FLOW VELOCITIES AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE DETENTION TIME 10 ACHIEVE SPECIFIED NUTRIENT REDUCTION.

T.W.L.

FLOW IN

FLOW OUT

SURCHARGE STORAGE

BASE STORAGE

SECTION THROUGH DETENTION BASIN

TYPICAL DETENTION BASIN

Figure 14

C 11I1 I I CI liii '.JJfl¼.'. rluI_l_ rn I

'

12

f26

i:

23

16

17

_ 29/6

EJTT* IftI I -

F 1 i 7 '1 T

9... PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN LOCATIONS

DRAFT E.P.P. WETLAND AREAS

WETLAND AREAS PROPOSED DETENTION BASINS

(2-15 ha each) Figure 15j

THIS NORTHERN PORTION IS NOT UNDER THE

PROPONENTS CONTROL


OEGRAOEO \WETLA#iD -

\ \

Saw pIt Gully

T4y

-T- -' I

NJ

vri.it: uAmtb 6 MVUH

LEGEND

E.P.P. WETLANDS --

SCENARIO 1

SCENARIO 2 'V r-,.. i: '

r >4 00000 SCENARIO 3 :--

SCENARIO 4

WETLAND CONSERVATION AREAS

Figure 16J

ellenbrook public environmental review tables & …

Documents