element global opportunities equity portfolio - september 2012

Upload: filipe

Post on 04-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio - September 2012

    1/3

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD

    2011 -1,11% 1,61% -2,05% 3,30% -1,25% -1,72% -1,37% -7,23% -7,20% 8,70% -2,83% -1,18% -12,57%

    2012 7,06% 5,19% 1,62% -0,86% -6,98% 2,62% 0,62% 2,67% 1,35% 13,37%

    Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio

    The Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio has the mandate to goanywhere in pursuit of attractive investment opportunities,

    using a bottom-up investment approach. Being equity focused, the portfolio has at least 70% of its assets invested in international

    equity markets. Theportfolio uses as benchmarkthe MSCI World(Local) but it does not seek to mimic or track this index in any way.

    September 2012

    Net Asset Value (NAV) : 99.13

    Portfolio Assets: 70000

    Launch date: 14-January-2011

    Portfolio Manager: Filipe Alves da Silva, CAIA

    Portfolio DetailsInvestment Highlights

    I was taught at university that markets are efficient, which means that the

    market price of a security is its correct price. Fast forward a few years and

    here I am, scourging the global equity markets for underpriced securities,

    trying to do exactly what I was taught was impossible. In other words, I am

    going against modern finance, in disagreeing with the efficient markets

    hypothesis. Quite bold of me, don't you think?

    There is a joke amongst value investors: two professors who are walking

    down the corridors of their finance department, and one of them spots a

    a

    Monthly Performance

    hundred dollar bill lying on the floor. He tries to pick it up but the other professor stops him and says youcant pick it up because its

    not there. If it were there, it would have already been picked up. There is a janitor who sees the two professors walk away leaving the

    hundred dollar bill on the floor. He picks it up and enjoys the money.

    I have been following a company called Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp for a long time. Yukon is a gold miner with properties in the US and

    Canada that got itself into serious troubles a couple of years ago: they ran into environmental problems and had to do major

    refurbishment work in their ore processing plant (roaster). Throw in a global recession and you have a recipe for disaster. To survive,

    the company was forced to raise cash, both by entering into forward gold sales, and by issuing lots of shares and warrants, resulting in

    massive dilution for shareholders. Needless to say, the stock price plunged, going from $1.70 to as low as $0.03.

    Despite believing that they would pull through, the possibility of the turnaround not being successful was too high, and the risk of

    dilution kept me at bay, that is, until now: Yukon recently reported that it achieved steady state production and is now generatingpositive operating cash flow. With the majority of the execution risk behind, I now feel comfortable investing.

    To the numbers: if all goes according to plan, the company will produce 200Koz of gold per year, of which it must pay 60Koz/yr to

    lenders (until 2015). With a production cost of around $750/oz and $10 million of G&A costs, you get a profit from operations of $140

    Mn per year. I am more conservative, and assume annual production of 150Koz and production costs of $870, which returns profits

    from operations of $70 million. Because of losses in the past, the company will not pay taxes on profits any time soon. Plus, from 2016

    onwards, it will keep all its production, which significantly increases operating profits.

    The market capitalization of Yukon is around $300Mn, or 5 times our estimated earnings, and it holds little debt (besides the forward

    gold sales, which are already accounted for in the estimate).

    This is already enough to get me very interested, but there is more: If you are going to mine gold in Nevada, you will need a roaster.

    There are only three roasters in Nevada, and the only with spare capacity is owned by Yukon. It is very difficult to get approval for a new

    roaster, and there are no plans to build a new one in the near future. The other two roasters are owned by Barrick and Newmont.

    Weekly Performance Chart

    82

    85

    88

    91

    94

    97

    100

    103

    106

    Jan-11 Apr-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12 May-12 Aug-12

    MSCI World Local

    Portfolio

    The roaster is a very important piece of the puzzle. First, it has spare

    capacity, and management wants to do toll agreements where it will process

    ore from a 3rd party for a fee, which will be another source of revenue.

    Second, its estimated value eclipses the current market value of the

    company: management believes it is worth at least $1bn, I would play it safe

    and cut that in half. Third, the roaster makes Yukon a very attractive

    acquisition target for a bigger player. Even if it is not acquired, Yukon is

    trading for at very low valuation, something we expect to correct as the

    company proves it has turned the corner and left its problems behind.

    In Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp, I think we just picked up a hundred dollar bill

    that was lying on the floor.

    The portfolio is up by +13.37% this year, outperforming the general equity

    market, as measured by the MSCI World Index (local), by +3.07%.

  • 7/29/2019 Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio - September 2012

    2/3

    Allocation by CountryAllocation by Sector

    Currency Exposure

    Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio

    For more information please contact Filipe Alves da Silva directly

    or send an email to [email protected]

    Contacts

    Weight

    iShares MSCI World ETF Hedged 15,9%

    IBM 8,5%

    Apple Inc 8,1%

    Microsoft Corporation 6,6%

    Fidel i ty China Special Situations 5,5%

    PepsiCo 5,5%

    Berkshire Hathaway 4,2%

    Amadeus IT Holdings 4,0%

    Teva Pharmaceuticals 3,9%

    BMW 3,5%

    65,8%

    Name

    Total

    11,8%

    32,4%

    1,9%

    1,7%

    17,6%

    12,8%

    6,1%

    4,5%

    4,3%

    0,6%

    1,4%

    5,6%

    0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

    Financials

    Information Technology

    Industrials

    Energy

    Consumer Discretionary

    Consumer Staples

    Health Care

    Materials

    ecommunication Services

    Utilities

    Real Estate

    Cash

    56,3%

    1,4%

    1,8%

    4,9%

    2,2%

    0,6%

    4,1%

    0,6%

    7,4%

    0,2%

    0,2%

    0,2%

    6,5%

    1,7%

    6,4%

    5,6%

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

    United States

    Japan

    United KingdomCanada

    France

    Australia

    Germany

    Switzerland

    Spain

    Sweden

    Italy

    Netherlands

    China

    Brazil

    Others

    Cash

    100,8%

    -14,1%

    6,1%1,7% 3,7% 0,3% 1,8%

    -40%

    -20%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    EUR USD CNY BRL CAD GBP UAH

    Max. Long Exposure: 130%

    Min. Long Exposure: 70%

    Equity Hedging: May use options on single

    name equities or equity indices

    to hedge downside risk

    Currency Hedging: Hedged on a best effort

    basis

    Investment Guidelines

    Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

    Reference in this document to specific securities should not be

    construed as a recommendation to buy or sell these securities.

    Disclaimer

    E L E M E N T

    Largest Positions

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio - September 2012

    3/3

    Complete List of Holdings

    Element Global Opportunities Equity Portfolio

    Disclaimer: Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Reference in this document to specific securities should not be construed as arecommendation to buy or sell these securities.

    Weight

    iShares MSCI World ETF Hedged 15,9%

    IBM 8,5%

    Apple Inc 8,1%

    Microsoft Corporation 6,6%

    Fideli ty China Special Situations 5,5%

    PepsiCo 5,5%

    Berkshire Hathaway 4,2%

    Amadeus IT Holdings 4,0%

    Teva Pharmaceuticals 3,9%

    BMW 3,5%

    Archer Daniels Midlands 3,3%

    Lowe's 2,7%

    BlackRock 2,6%

    Telefnica 2,3%

    Corning Inc 2,0%

    Avangard 1,8%

    MRV Engenharia 1,7%

    Renault 1,6%

    Jakks Pacific 1,5%

    Energold Drilling 1,4%

    Chatham Lodging Trust 1,4%

    Monument Mining 1,2%

    IMAX Corporation 1,0%

    GAP Inc 1,0%

    Telefonica 11 PUT 06/2013 0,8%

    OPAP 0,7%

    Cninsure 0,6%

    Premier Exhibitions 0,5%

    PAX Global Technology 0,4%

    Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp 0,3%

    Addvantage Technologies 0,2%

    Ted Baker 0,2%

    La Seda de Barcelona 0,2%

    Cash 4,8%

    Total 100,0%

    Name