electronic crash capture and submission historical review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08...

19
Electronic Crash Capture and Submission (ECCS)

Upload: others

Post on 07-Mar-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Electronic Crash Capture and Submission

(ECCS)

Page 2: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

What is ECCS

The ability of a police officer/agency to

electronically complete and submit a crash

form (UD-10)

Page 3: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Why

Electronic processing of a UD-10 provides significant benefits:

AccuracyTimelinessConsistencyCompleteness

Cost

Page 4: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Project

In 2007-2011 52 grants totaling $3.4 million have been awarded to police agencies

to provide for ECCS projects: LaptopsCrash softwareConnectivity Magstripe readersTraining

Page 5: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Agencies Since 2006, Michigan has increased the number of police agencies

collecting and submitting crash reports from 2% to over 60%.

2006-2011 AGENCIES x Submission Type

2.0% 2.6% 12.5%

39.3%

60.0% 62.0%

97.4%

87.5%

61.0%

40.0% 38.0%

98.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Electronic Paper

Page 6: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Crashes Since 2006, Michigan has increased the number of UD-10’s being

collected and submitted electronically from less than 1% to over 70%.

2006-2011 CRASHES x Submission Type

0.8% 2.5% 6.1%

21.6%

53.9% 55.0%

97.5%93.9%

78.4%

46.1% 45.0%

99.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Electronic Paper

Page 7: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2005 003

Page 8: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2006 013

Page 9: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2007 017

Page 10: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2008 082

Page 11: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2009 251

Page 12: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2010 392

Page 13: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

2011 406

Page 14: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Accuracy Michigan Traffic Reporting System (TCRS) Edit Errors 2007-2015

1.75

1.55 1.52 1.521.46

1.41.33 1.29

1.24

0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

0.890.79 0.77 0.77 0.74 0.71 0.68 0.65 0.63

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012* 2013* 2014* 2015*

Years *Goals

Number of Edit Errors per Crash

Paper

Electronic

Paper v. Electronic Mean

Note: * Indicates a 4 %annual improvement ratefor a total of 18.5% at endof trend

Page 15: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Timeliness Michigan Traffic Crash Reporting System (TCRS) Mean Reporting Days

for Paper vs. Electronic Submissions 2007-2015

25.45 26.05 25.62

20.7319.9

19.118.34

17.6116.9

14.7113.23

10.67 11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2

20.08 19.6418.145

16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

*20

12*

2013

* 20

14*

2015

*

Years *Goals

Average Reporting

Days

Paper

Electronic

Paper vs. Electronic Mean

Page 16: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

ECCS-5 Tentative Timeline (based on funding availability)

• July 2011 – Request for letters of interest emailed to MSP Crime & Crash listserv

• August 2011 – Deadline for letters of interest

• September 2011 – Awards determined & OHSP e-grant applications completed

• October 2011 – ECCS grant activity begins

Page 17: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

BAC Reporting Grant

• Partnership with MADD National

• Increase Michigan’s BAC reporting in fatal crashes

• Michigan’s current reporting is 60%

Page 18: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

BAC Reporting Grant Results• UD-10 Contact person at each agency

• Alcohol & Drug Reporting Reference GuideThe UD-10 Contact form and reference guide can be found at http://www.michigan.gov/crash

• Training (Crash Trainer & MI-Train Webinar)http://mi.train.orgFARS - Alcohol and Drug ReportingCourse ID: 1025575

Page 19: Electronic Crash Capture and Submission Historical Review...11.28 10.83 10.4 9.98 9.58 9.2 20.08 19.64 18.145 16.005 15.36 14.75 14.16 13.59 13.05. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30. 2 0 07 20 08

Traffic Records Contacts

UD-10 Training: Dean [email protected]

Traffic Crash Data Inquiries: Michael [email protected]

Traffic Records Grants: Alicia [email protected]

BAC Reporting: Lorie [email protected]