1

EIP-AGRI Focus Group Robust and resilient dairy production systems Starting paper 23/24th November 2016, Zagreb, Croatia Dr. César Resch Zafra

2

1. The comanimal wwelfare, existing positivelyresulting Robustneexpress conditionare all ke

In view oFocus Gr

QUESTIOgroup shwelfare, profitabi

The Focu

Tha

Ta

Si

i

Is

The Focucould looproductiv

Introdu

mpetitive envwelfare due

which includand possibley affect anim

g in a higher

ess combinea high prodns’. It is theey priorities

of the sustairoup will inve

ON: how to chould look fomonitoring, lity and susta

us Group is e

To identify nhusbandry inat animal, faTo analyse tanimal welfaSummarise hin addressingPropose poteimprovemenIdentify needsolved by fur

us Group is eok into paradvity per lifeti

uction

vironment oto various stdes animal he synergies bmal health, ofarm income

es both sidesuction potenrefore the liin dairy cattl

ned economestigate the f

create good cor approaches

and overall ainability (in

expected to c

new or undern different prarm, species he impact of

are, their suchow to addreg the challenential innovat of robustneds from pracrther researc

encouraged tdigm shifts reme.

f dairy cattltressors. It ihealth. Howebetween bothr for example.

of the prodntial combinenk between e production

ic pressure ofollowing que

conditions fos and practicmanagemenanimal welfa

carry out the

rused approaroduction sysand/or produf the most prcess and fail

ess these aspnges identifietive actions ess related pctice and posch.

to make use elated to rob

le productionis argued thever, this is h concepts. Te the increa

uctivity versed with resilieconomic c

n.

on the dairy estion.

or dairy cattleces which takt in all parts are terms) s

e following m

aches and prstems and reuction systemromising idenl factors and pects and exed. and ideas fo

practices at fassible gaps in

of insights cbustness, suc

n systems ishat there is t

not always This includessed attention

us welfare dience to streompetitivene

cattle sector

e husbandry ke into accouof the life cyhould be ass

main tasks:

actices whichegions. Practm level can bntified approbarriers for plore the rol

or Operationaarm level. n knowledge

created by prch as the mov

s often linketrade-off betthe case. In

s the idea thn for robustn

ebate. It canessors in a wess, resilienc

and demand

in different unt breeding,ycle of animasessed.

h increase roices and strabe taken intoaches and primplementate of innovati

al Groups to s

related to ro

revious and ove from prod

TITLE DAT

ed to increatween produncreasing atthat general wness-related

n be definedwide variety ce and anima

d for animal

production s, nutrition, feals. The impa

obustness in ategies increao account. ractices on ption. ion and know

stimulate the

obustness wh

on-going productivity per

TE

ased pressuruction and antention is pawelfare conditraits in bree

d as ‘the abilof environmal welfare, w

welfare, this

systems? Theertility, healtact on

dairy cattle asing robustn

profitability a

wledge excha

e use and

hich may be

ojects. The glactation to

re on nimal aid to itions eding

ity to mental which

s

e th,

ness

nd

ange

roup

3

Fig 1 Thcentered

What is item: Milk price

p

ce

S

The “Robenvironmemissionreflection This docscope, frneed ans

1 http://w

he challenge d triangle.

a robust &re

ce and input pFarming busplan) with thFarm busineclass and raiefficient per Such busines

Prov Be e Allow Allow

bust and resmental sustan from cattle ns and to cre

cument addrrom big andswers for the

www.dairynz.c

Three Sp

of multiple

esilient syste

prices will besinesses will he technical eesses must beinfall in mind

r unit of land,esses should: vide a reasonenvironmentaw for an enjow opportunit

ilient dairy syinability haveproduction)

eate a good a

resses topicsd intensive faese systems

co.nz/media/4

pheres of Rob

objectives.

em in terms

e more variabneed to be

expertise to be business fod; they must , labour and

nable rate of ally sustainaboyable and reties for trainin

ystems” Focue been tackl. This documand open mi

s affecting tharms to smato become m

4106342/resil

bust & Resilie

A robust an

of dairy? Bre

able than theye resilient; th

make appropfocused; theyt be based oncapital, and

f return on eqble and animrewarding lifeing and perso

us Group willed in two ot

ment is writteinded enviro

he robustnesall and grassmore robust

lient-dairy-far

ent Agricultu

nd resilient d

endan Heron

ey have been his requires aopriate tacticay must be den elite high pthey must lim

quity mal welfare coestyle onal develop

ll focus on anther focus gen to encournment for th

ss and resilis based farmand resilient

rming-systems

ural Productio

dairy product

n and John R

historically. a solid farm al decisions (tesigned with performance imit their exp

ompliant

pment

nimal welfareroups (perm

rage the parthe first meeti

ence of dairms, but for a.

s.pdf

on Systems

TITLE DAT

tion system

Roche1 wrote

system foun(tactical impleland product

e animals, theposure to ext

e and producmanent grassticipants to dng in Zagreb

ry productioall there are

TE

should be in

e a paper on

ndation (stralementation).ction capacityey must be hternal forces.

ctivity. Aspecslands & redudiscuss, to trb.

n in a very questions w

n the

n this

ategic ). y, soil highly s.

cts of ucing rigger

wide which

4

2. CA robustThis focdemandsthose nethis focuwelfare. farm inco

In this fofarm aniwith resisystems

The futuanimal wcreate mdomains

T A G G

Challent & resilient dcus group tas for more aew circumstaus group is hTherefore, rome will nee

ocus group ‘imals is defin

silience to strlevel can he

ure is uncertawelfare in damore robust as is proposed

Disease outbReduced effeExtreme wea

o Heato Higho Drouo Othe

TemperatureFeed prices, Availability oMild prices vGrazing daysDemand for Longevity (cNew milk quPollution regGHG emissioNew technolMore…

nges fodairy productackles differeanimal friendances tends how to comresponses toed to conside

robustness’ cned in this Fressors in a welp achieving

ain by definiiry systems. and resilient below:

breaks ectiveness ofather conditiot and cold wah humidity ught er extreme we stress (heaavailability a

of skilled labovolatility s and other pantibiotic redulling strategality demand

gulations ons and carboogy in milkin

r dairy tion system sent types ofly productionto first ensubine this wit challenges

er animal wel

combines boFocus Groupwide variety this, as they

tion so we cNeverthelesproduction.

f conventionaons aves

weather event, cold)

and variabilityour

prescription oduction gies) ds (compone

on footprintng and housi

producshould be abf challengesn systems to

ure productivth the maintlike high priclfare combin

oth sides of tp as ‘‘the abiof environm

y set the bro

can’t make ass, envisionin

An initial lis

al treatment

nts

ty (own prod

of production

ents, function

ng

ction syble to withstas with diverso environmenvity levels, butenance or eces of conceed with the e

the productivbility to expremental conditi

ader scene f

a complete ling those chast of factors

s (i.e. antibio

uced and im

n systems (co

nal traits, etc

ystems and changes se sources. ntal change, ut the startineven improvntrates or loeconomic res

vity versus wess a high prtions’ Actionsfor increasing

st of factorsllenges is thfrom environ

otic resistanc

ported)

onsumer dem

c.)

TITLE DAT

from outsideFrom markelike ‘warmin

ng point for vement of apow milk pricesilience of th

welfare debatproduction pos at differentg robustness

s challenginghe first and cnmental, eco

ce)

mand)

TE

e its own syset demands,ng’. Adaptatiothe discussio

ppropriate anes resulting inhe farm.

te. Robustneotential combt levels, inclus.

g productivitycritical exercionomic and s

stem. , like on to on of nimal n low

ess in bined uding

y and se to social

5

3. Tgood Dairy proexpressedairy sysrobustnedifferentThe inteconsiderdifferentconditionThereforefficiencyObviouslaffectingdepends The samproductiodifferent

Robustnedairy indhow robquite useor hectacommunproductioIn the nresiliencematrix. Iissues andiscussin

2 A.D. So

The dimd condit

oduction hased through nstems needsess can be cot challenges mer-relation ored an impot circumstanns of dairy pre it requiresy, which is oly, these difg robustnesss on the appr

me occurs won system let for the thre

ess is a comdustry and esust & resiliened to efficienre of farmla

nication to son performanext section e (R&R) of dIn the subsend, althoughng measures

oteriades et al

Cow

mensiotions

s to deal witnew regulatios to be consonsidered atmay be envis

of productionortant variabces and thuroduction. s a holistic

often addressfferent dimes may be infroach used, t

with the leveevels, althouee levels.

Figure 2

mplex subjectspecially farmnt the farm incy indicatornd. The larg

stakeholders.nce parametseven topic

dairy productequent sectih they are no

to increase

(2015). Agric

Environmental

Social

•Milk funtional traits

•Use of antibiotics

Economic

•Genetic index

•Breed

•Kg solids

•Kg protein

•% Fat

ons of r

th stressors cons) and enidered from t cow, herd asaged in onen and welfa

ble for enhaus improves

approach (ssed within thensions of tfluencing it the field of e

els of robustugh importan

2 Robustness

t and addresmers need ins, or which as which eval

ge number of. Furthermorters and the cs are propotion from theion two topiot within therobustness a

cultural and fo

Herd

robustn

coming fromnvironmental

the three pand productie or more of are debate nced robustfarm econo

see figure 2)he dairy practthe robustnesimultaneou

expertise, or

tness matrixnce from rob

s matrix: 3 p

ssing it at fandicators easare weak aspuate dairy syf these indicre, such paholistic insig

osed as of me animal welfics are discue frame of tand resilience

ood science. V

Environm

•Relative sdesviatio

• Lifetime p

Social

•Carbon fo

•Days cow

•Animal w

Economi

•Rate metadiseases

•Rate of m•% Cows pr

•Age at firs

ness an

m economic ((climate chaerspectives on system (fthose dimenhas a doub

tness becausomics or be

). It goes futice and reseess matrix ausly at differgeographica

x: CO2 emisbustness per

pillars and 3 l

arm level possy to understpects to be iystems with cators sometrtial ratios d

ght is frequenmajor relevafare and ecoussed whichhis focus groe.

Vol24: 235-24

mental

standard n yield

performance

oot print

ws are grazing

welfare

c

abolic 

astitisregnant

st calving

nd mea

i.e. changingange) domaand not fromfarm) levels

nsions. ble perspectse it leads tecause it’s a

urther than tearch commuare completerent pillars al and cultura

ssions can bspective and

levels of ana

ses importanand and to umproved. Nopartial ratiosimes complicdo not accontly missed.2 ance when ronomics pers

are more roup, they sh

48

Produsystem

TITLE DAT

asures

g prices of inins. Therefom just one osince strateg

tive. Animal to higher p

a social requ

the concept unities. ely inter-relaand levels. Ial background

be analyzed d variables in

alysis

nt challengesuse which caowadays thes referring tocates their in

ount for the reflecting onspective withrelated to thhould be bor

Environm

•Purchased 

•Home mad

•Replaceme

•Emissions G

Social

•Biodiversit

•Water man

•Gender po

•Disabled w

•Succession

Economic

•Open days

•Calving inveuction m

TE

to crea

nputs), sociare, robustneof them. Besgies to tackle

welfare caroductivity uuirement fra

of resource

ated and faIn many casd.

at cow, hernvolved migh

s. Practitionean give an ide sector is alro kilogram ofnterpretation

whole rang

n robustnessin the robusthe environmne in mind w

mental

feed 

de feed balance

ent heifers

GHG

ty & landscape

nagement

licy at farms

workers

n rate

erval

ate

al (i.e ess in sides, e the

n be under aming

e use

actors ses it

rd or ht be

ers in ea of ready f milk n and ge of

s and tness

mental when

6

The maiapproachand that

4. Ts

a. GGeneticsanimals particuladependeregional foreseenincreasedto a bettBesides, farmers considerfertility ileads toincreasedDairy cowor very hdairy codifferentdifferentGenetic built, imbreeding

b. AA low mcombinerobust imMetaboligeneral when thpoor feeespeciallThe mosthe shapcombineas well aMilk quacorrelatioOverall hdrawing significanAs menthealth an

in aim presehes and gapst some items

Topics system

Genetics s has greatly genetically m

ar setting of ent. Thus thelevel and co

n for the futud productionter valorisatioalthough geincreasing

red (or even index, streng

o an enhancd feed pricesw breeding shumid period

ow productiot productiont. indices must

mmunity are g line, anima

Animal hemorbidity rated with goodmmune systec diseases aproblem for ings are noted economyy in the mos

st common dpe of the u

ed. Persistentas the lifespaality is also ron with a higherd welfaremore and m

nt though. tioned in othnd welfare p

enting thoses in innovatio

s may be lack

relatems

and breecontributed

more efficiena given pro

e question arontextual facure-, is this bn potential baon of differenenetic indexemilk yield hneglected). gth of immued efficiencys or growing should also bds for grazin

on under ext systems (i

t have a broacomponents

l. Once these

ealth andte, or rate od animal weems (i.e throare a cause the whole h

t going well y. New techst intensive sdisease in daudder, envirot lameness ian of the cowelated to thigh morbidity e aspects camore public a

her sectionsproblems and

e topics is toon and reseaking. For eve

ed to r

ding to improving

nt in their prooduction sysrises: if prodctors have bebreeding apprased on an int types of fo

es normally inhas been thFor instance

une system y in transfordemands on

be analysed ng dairy herdtreme and v.e indoors v

ader scope ts that coulde indices are

d welfareof disease inelfare. Severaugh targetedof concern

herd and thein terms of nologies and

systems. iry farms is onment, cows another fre

ws suffering fs item; somrate.

an affect maattention, in

s below, pred they can pla

to encouragearch. This meery topic som

robustn

g dairy cowsoduction env

stem and enuction systeeen quite staroach still vaincreased usorage. nclude severhe main goae milk yield reor longevityrming feed n less GHG ein terms of ads. Breeding volatile (i.e vs. outdoors

than just prod be includee available, th

n farms, is al elements d breeding).in many far

ey can causenutrients or d approache

mastitis. Thew comfort, nequent and from this affl

matic cell cou

any of the fncreasingly in

ecision livestay a major ro

e discussioneans that mo

me indicators

ness an

’ yields in thevironment. Ivironmental ms have folloable during talid to cope tse of concent

al traits relatal. As resultecords were

of dairy coto milk and

emissions. adaptation tostrategies aseasonal diss) where re

oduction. Feeed in the gehey should b

a determinican be con

rms for sevee serious ecobalance in r

es to reduce

e cause is usnutrition, amserious factoliction.. nt and risk o

factors mentnfluencing co

ock technoloole supportin

and identifyore questionsat farm leve

nd res

e last years. n this way sconditions a

owed a kind he previous o new changtrates vs. pri

ted to profitat many otheimproved fa

ows. Neverth therefore t

o environmenare expectedsorders) weaelevant varia

ed conversionenetic indicee easy to use

ng factor fonsidered, sta

eral reasons.onomic losseration, and the these dise

sually multifamong others,or affecting b

of presence

tioned aboveonsumer cho

ogies offer mng farmers a

TITLE DAT

fy new potes than answe

el are propos

silience

Classical apselection is cand, at the of standarddecades –co

ging conditioioritisation o

ability, for maers characteaster and deeheless a highto higher ro

ntal stressord to contributather conditables and s

n efficiency, es, on severse for farmers

or a robust arting from t

. These disees. They are hey are geneases shoul

actorial and/os, may be inboth welfare

of antibiotic

e and animaoice. Regiona

much potentnd farm adv

TE

ntially innovers are preseed (Figure 2

in da

proaches looclosely linkedsame time, isation patteompared to tons? i.e cowsf traits cond

any breederseristics were eper compareher fertility iobustness ag

rs like heat wte to maintaions, considtressors ma

longevity, soral levels; bs.

dairy produthe promotio

eases are ofta good indierally linked d be develo

or morpholognvolved alone and produc

s have a po

al welfare is al difference

tial for deteisors.

vative ented ).

airy

ok for d to a

path ern at those s with ucive

s and less

ed to index gainst

waves aining ering y be

olids, reed,

uction on of

ten a cator with

oped,

gical: ne or ction,

sitive

also s are

ecting

7

Cow lonapproachpoint of herds recost of relement which alcross vs Age at fi

c. Feed is tanimal wresilienceare two In generspread interms ofpoultry. same rafeeder. Tsame ocseasonalperforma

Frequentbalancedliters smprotein Research(NutrientTherefor(i.e. conc

ngevity, whiches concerniattention bo

eplacement hrearing heife(unit cost),

lso relate to black and wrst calving is

Feeding sthe most impwelfare. Anye in any dairkey aspects ral terms, fen dairy herdsf yield, weighThis is a vetion with thoThus, to fit ccurs with sl availabilityance, and ma

tly, farms asd in terms of

mall dairy cowcontent; thih Council ret Requiremere, precision cerning meta

ch was alreaing, for insta

oth in terms oheifers’ expeners by numbbut the secoR&R of the

white males, hs a factor rela

strategiesportant expey improvemery system. Fehere. eed efficiencs but compaht or physiolery weak poiose at the erations to co

seasonal calvy of feed aany others c

sses their paf cows’ necew at peak in s makes mo

ecommendednts of Dairy feeding may

abolic disord

ady mentionance, life feeof productionnses is a key

bers of heifeond one shoe farm: how how many feated with rep

s ense in dairy ent in feedineeding strate

cy in dairy cred to monoogical stagesnt in farms

end of lactatows’ necessitving herds ialso varies ome togethe

addocks covessities regardlate April graore than 4 an averageCattle 2001)y become a gers).

Figure

ed under theding or hean and welfary economic frs reared. Tuld be furtheto measure

emales shoulplacement he

farms and gng performaegy in genera

cows is loweo-gastric, whs is much hiwhere at th

tion, yieldingties in an alin terms of complexity

er here influe

erage in termrding energy azes 17/18 kkilograms o

e 16% of p). In this casgood tool to

e 3. Coefficie

he previous lth (includingre. It has indfactor. This f

There is a loter explored. e number of d be reared eifer rate too

good nutritioance would al (including

er compared ich are flat rgher in the c

he same herdg 26 and oftll year arounadjusting raincreases. A

encing both p

ms of kilograand protein

kilograms (DMof protein inrotein in rat

se crude proto improve rob

ent of variat

heading, alsg culling appdeed a clear factor is the t of informaMany questheifers, eco

depending oo.

n is a core abe very relefeeding auto

to poultry oationed too, case of dairyd cows peaken having a nd calving syation to phyAspects likeproductivity a

ams of dry m? For instancM) of fresh g

daily rationtion to full ftein in ration bustness at p

tion

TITLE DAT

so depends proach). Thiseconomic diresult of mu

ation availabltions about tonomics of son farm situa

aspect of botevant in teronomy) and f

or swine. Flthe coefficie

y cows compking 52 liters 35 liters deystem is a cysiological ne body condand welfare.

matter, but hce, in a grazgrass with a n. Neverthelfill necessitie is more thaproduction a

TE

on manages is another mension: in ultiplying thele about thethis can be rasuckler x hoation?

th productionrms of improfeeding effic

at ration is ent of variatipared to swins often shareesigned ratiohallenge andecessities. Wdition, meta

how is this rzing system, 22/25% of cess the Nat

es of thosen 40% in ex

and welfare l

ment clear dairy

e unit e first aised lstein

n and oving iency

wide on in ne or e the on on d the When abolic

ration a 25

crude tional cows

xcess. evels

8

Feed aumetrics cConcentrthem in indicatorprobablyThe ovepossibilitfeed andgood prewith the

Forage qfood reqare shorration. Tmatrix, fLifetime lactationinformat

d. Fertility ibetweenThese lodiminishetransformto monit

tonomy meacan be considrates are incterms of ene

r to relate thy will face in erall feed baties and priced how far weeservation, aavailable for

quality shoulquirement forrt in protein This balance from just eco

cow perforns and age tion about he

Fertility in dairy herd

n fertility andow fertility raes when themed into fat tor by e.g. %

asures how dered to ass

cluded to balaergy. Milk /che amount othe future), lance will ules to buy [ge should go?as well as thrage (in farm

ld be considr dairy and cresources abetween en

onomic perspmance or lifto first calv

erd performa

ds is one of th milk yield; ftes lead to la duration of to be transfo

% Cows pregn

self-sufficieness it. ance nutrien

concentrate pof concentrata zero concetimately dep

good] externa? This also ree presence o

m or purchase

ered too, nocrops grown and those reergy and pro

pective to be fetime daily ving in a sinance and may

he big challefor many higactations lastthe lactationormed in milnant, open d

Fig

nt farms are

nts in dairy raprice ratio wte per liter? entrate stratepend on feaal feed. In telates to theof the necesed).

ot just in teris a good ta

elying on graotein produc considered performanc

ngle measury also be ver

enges farms h performanting over onen becomes lok has a lowe

days and calv

gure 4. Milk f

e in terms o

ations, mainlas almost coAccording toegy is wise osibility and erms of resi

e importancessary farming

rms of presesk to look at

azing need mced on farm too in terms ce are indicarement. Thisry relevant a

must face. Itnce dairy cowe year or eveonger. Besideer efficiency tving interval

feed price ra

of forage and

y protein anonstant till 20o price volatior is not? prices to malience, how w

e of obtainingg skills to me

ervation. Tryt. Farms relymore energy relates to difof animal w

ators that gs combinatios indicator fo

t seems therw herds, pooren longer. Coes, in terms othan feed to

tio

TITLE DAT

d concentrat

nd energy, an007 (Figure ility we are

ake [good] wise is it to g a high quaeet the requ

y to keep a ying upon ma

to balance fferent aspe

welfare. gather milk yon of factoror R&R of a d

re is no stronr fertility rateows’ efficiencof efficiency,milk directly

TE

tes and diffe

nd to concen4), is this a facing (and

own feed anrely on impo

ality forage airements of

balance betwaize, for instatheir dairy ccts of robust

yield, numbers gives a lodairy farm.

ng correlationes are a conccy feed to m feed

y. Fertility is e

erent

ntrate good most

nd/or orted and a cows

ween ance, cows’ tness

er of ot of

n cern. ilk

easy

9

e. OThis refeand condprices. Fbalance support

f. These arease of mNew techphysiologparameton cause

Roboticsin severacertain p

Indoors relationsright bal

g. Quality ameasurea farm (deliverab

Overall pers to how thditions, avail

For each comof productioservices arou

Housing, re related to movements ahnologies sugical, producters, etc.). Ide-effect relat

s is another nal dairy regioproduction sy

and grazing s among feedance in diffe

Milk qualand quantityes could be im(number of bles are incre

roductionhe different oability of lab

mbination of vn and welfarund, to find t

facilities different as

are key elemch as sensorctive and behdentified heationship can

new domain ons. Challengystems (i.e. g

systems havding, health aerent product

ity y of milk collmplemented liters/kg of easingly bein

n planningoperational aour, housingvariables a bre. Skills and the proper b

and equipects of prod

ments for animrs and IT allohavioural asplth or welfarebe quickly ge

of developmges remain fograzing herds

ve different pand comfort tion systems

ected at farattending tomilk produce

ng considered

g aspects of theg and facilitieroad array o training of f

balance in bo

ipment duction and mal welfare.ow continuoupects (i.e. ace problems cenerated.

ment within dor combinings) and with s

performance appear (i.e. poses a cha

ms give us ao size. Althoued per day d, following

e farm are ores, institutionf production farmers are fth internal a

welfare. For

us monitoringtivity monitocan be respo

airy productig this and othsome welfare

concerning wthermal com

allenge.

a first “custough this is quor year), it consumer de

rganised in vnal framewor

systems mafundamental,nd external c

r instance, re

g and analysoring, oestrusnded to imm

ion. Automather automatie elements (

welfare aspemfort vs. acce

omer insightuite likely an still works n

emands and

TITLE DAT

view of biophrk and markeay be envisag, as well as tcontexts of t

esting and th

sis of environs detection, m

mediately and

tic milking is ion componei.e. SCC).

ects and seveess to pastur

t” about farmold fashione

nowadays. Nindustry inn

TE

hysical resouet demands aged with diffethe knowledgthe farm.

hermal comfo

nmental, milking d new knowle

well establisents within

eral inter-re). Finding t

m scale and ed way to preNeverthelessnovations: we

rces and erent ge

ort or

edge

shed

the

what esent new

e talk

10

about mrobustneIt seemscollectedenhanceThere isregions mothers de

h. This topThese voA strategwidely pIt is hardMany farproductioin decisioOther thdairy farConsisteconsistenboth toumanagercope witchange,

5. t

The topproductiosystem hBoth issutopics (ohave to

i. There is pollutionprotein iFurthermaspect, fgroup4.

3 Adapted4 See theagri_focu

milk quality iness both froms that thosed. Therefore,ed R&R of thes a clear relmilk componepending on

Economicic cuts acrosolatile conditgic vision, oracticed everd to understarmers focus oon efficiencyon making. S

han working rms in the paency: It is bently wrong, ugh to find rs need an eth changing and don’t try

Impacttowardics mentioneon system hhas impact oues are not or more in cabe borne in m

Efficiencya very posit

n, efficiency iin their outp

more protein further reflec

d from http://e starting papeus_group_nutr

n terms of fam economic oe elements w, coordinatioe dairy farm.lationship benents are mon seasonal fee

cs ss the seven tions could beperational efrywhere in thand the basion productio

y, but many fSome produchard and pr

ast. This has etter to be coit’s much eathe problem

evaluation prconditions a

y to constant

t of rod enviroed in the prhas an impaon the qualityto be put inase more aremind.

y and polltive and strois quite impoputs and theworth in mi

ction on nut

/dairybusinesser here: httpsrient_recycling

atty acids proor social perswill be moreon aspects o. etween milk ostly the samed milk comp

previous tope environmefficiency andhe dairy induc economics

on efficiency,farmers seemction practiceoducing as mchanged, an

onsistently wasier to identm and difficurocess or sysand not a retly tweak the

bustneonmentrevious chapact on its eny of air and n the spot lige proposed d

lution ong correlatioortant too. Faese practiceslk or meat istrient recyclin

s.com/archives://ec.europa.g_starting_pa

ofile, proteinspectives (obe or less releof production

componentme all year roponents may

pics. Resilienental, climaticd financial mustry. s of the chan, which is imm too often ies may be efmuch milk and is somethwrong than intify and corr

ult to correctstem to deal eactive respoe plan at eve

ess andt pter are direnvironment, water. Also

ght within thduring the w

on between arms increass led this fars much higheng of livesto

e/?p=4843 by.eu/eip/agricuaper_2016_en

n profile, lactbviously interevant depenn level with

ts and nutritound, due to y change wit

nce means thc, social, eco

management

nging dairy inportant, mosgnore profita

fficient, but ns you could,ing many pronconsistentlyrect than if at. To be reswith change

onse. Stay tery turn3.

d resilie

ectly related being part the percepti

his focus growork of the F

efficiency ansing nitrogenrm to recycler than its vaock manure

y Dave Natzkeulture/sites/ag.pdf

tose, etc., wrrelated). ding on milindustry leve

tion, breed athe same feh the season

he ability to nomic or othare the keys

ndustry or, tost of topics reability as a gnot profitable not a lot woducers are sy right. If I ham doing it silient or agie, this meanthe course o

ence in

to dairy proof the sustaon of society

oup. HoweveFG) mentione

nd robustnesn efficiency ae less nitrogalue as fertilis conducted

gri-eip/files/eip

TITLE DAT

which can be

k factory deel may be a

and other aeed all year lns.

cope with vohers. s but these

o have a plaelated before

general manae.

was needed tstruggling whave a dairy inconsistentlile in time o

ns to have a once you ma

n dairy

roduction itseainability. A y is part of t

er when disced before th

ss and resiliea couple of pgen as manuiser in slurry

d by another

p-

TE

seen in term

estination of lso importan

aspects. In song, but in m

olatile condit

are probably

n to cope wie are relatedagement goa

o be strategith. doing some

ly right. Theof volatility, proactive pla

ake a decisio

y syste

elf. Howevedairy produ

this environmcussing the shese issues b

ence. In termpoints would ure, for instay. Concerningr EIP-AGRI F

ms of

milk nt for

some many

tions.

y not

ith it. d with al and

gic on

thing en it’s dairy an to on to

ms

r the uction ment. seven below

ms of raise ance. g this Focus

11

Energy cconsiderof fossil consumpas good,a water but also A biggerGHG emprocessegrow. Anways thacome togA good understa

j. SSocial pe(i.e. demthrough areas citThe ideaproductioquality fothese podairy sysPerceiverejected and certcan be cfor morefrom thogiving tostrong ppoultry fmore frie

consumptionred in the frafuels in the

ption indicato, medium or scarcity conother key in

r challenge ismissions or wes in the farnother EIP-at are cost egether in thischallenge in

and.

Social peerception of mand for prdedicated p

tizens’ concea of ruminanton in the defood from ceoints or at lestems. d reduction by society in

tification systcontroversiale grazing daose orientedo behaviour point of dairyfactories. Daendly in socia

, water use ame of R&R. long term),

ors and evenbad (i.e. in text or with puts as N fes to address water consurm input supAGRI Focueffective for s topic. n this realm

rception oproduction moducts comi

policies (i.e. erns about ets as relativeeveloped wo

ellulose and teast to put a

of animal n some Eurotems proving and public

ays/pure grazd to biologic

and feelingsy industry. Thiry farms areal terms.

and other inAvailability oor soil deple

n having themterms of wahigh volatilit

rtilizers)? the perform

umption andpply chain,

us Group is farmers. In

is to find

of dairy inmethods is ining from coregulations

environmentaely importantorld contributhis is an excall aspects in

welfare in dopean regiong the farm pview may nozing systemsal functionins the same here are noe, in general

nputs, nowadof water (quetion are critm, most farmater, electricitty of oil pric

ance of the d pollution bbut requestsdiscussing i

the long te

simple indic

ndustry ncreasingly inncrete, somon animal w

al impact of t GHG sourceute to globaclusive charan the balanc

dairy systems, where aniperformance ot always cos vs. thermang (towards importance.huge dairy fl, based on s

days less relantity and q

tical elementmers would pty, fuel or ga

ces (which af

farm up andbecomes eves for that arin depth howerm environm

cators to be

nfluencing pretimes certiwelfare). Espcattle livesto

e is increasinl warming, bacteristic. Hoe should als

ms, especiallimal welfare-in that real

orrespond toal comfort).

productivity Neverthelesfactories withsmall and fa

evant in ecouality), energs for R&R. In

probably find as expenses)ffects not on

downstreamen more core increasingw to reduce mental, econ

measured a

roduction itsefied or labepecially in thock systemsgly debated.but ruminanow to create o be a goal

ly those mo-sensitive com. What’s u

o science- baDifferent ap

y aspects as ss, animal wh thousands mily farms t

TITLE DAT

onomic termrgy prices (orn most of fa it difficult to). How resilienly direct cos

m. For instanomplicated wg as environcattle livest

nomic and so

and which a

elf, either threlled, produche most intes, including d. Neverthelesnts are able

a friendly afor enhanci

ore intensivensumers clai

understood based knowledpproaches cas health or gwelfare may

of cows, cothat may be

TE

s, should ber even availa

arms there aro rank their fent is the farst of fuel at

nce, calculatiowhen considnmental conctock emissioocial perspec

are very eas

rough the mction systemensive produdairy, is growss, most livesto produce tmosphere ang robustne

e, is increasim for monitby animal wedge (i.e. demn be considgrowth) to tbe profiled

ompared to pconsidered m

e also ability re no farms rm in farm

on of ering cerns ns in ctives

sy to

arket s) or

uction wing. stock high

about ess of

singly toring elfare mand ered, those as a

pig or much

12

Europe´cattle acthis land

6. This is nR&R of d

The taskcompromAppropriprovide ability togreenhosupply ctheir farFurther w To rank way miggoing oninform cothers it

s landscape ctivity definitidscape would

Reflectot intended dairy systems

k of the FG mises betweeiateness to ainformation

o make inforuse gases as

chain those em boundarywork is need

farms in termght be a goodn at dairy farcustomers abems related

is forest, padively contribud be difficult

tions to be a comps in view of p

is not easy,en technical, audience muto which th

rmed responssociated witemissions ar. Some pote

ded to elabor

ms of robustd way to comrms should bbout dairy prwith sustain

ddocks, meautes to presewithout cattl

prehensive liproductivity a

, dairy systesocial and e

ust be anothehe receiver onses to differth the produrose. Howevential indicatorate guidance

ness combinmmunicate wbe another goroduct qualityability and R

adows, cropserving this lale farming.

ist, but reflecand animal w

ems are veryeconomic soluer issue for of that inforrent metrics

uction of the ver farmers cors were mee on the sele

ning productivwith society. oal for this Fy in terms o

R&R will add

, etc., and it ndscape in m

cts some viewwelfare.

y complex autions must this focus gmation can . For exampproduct they

can respondentioned to section of app

vity and animTransparenc

FG. Dairy proof animal wea plus of rob

has been in many Europe

ws on the pr

nd often thebe adopted. roup. Metricrespond. Ta

ple; consumey are consum best to thestrongly link ropriate met

mal welfare icy and easy oducts are mlfare, environbustness and

TITLE DAT

this way forean regions,

riority areas

ere is no 10

cs are most uarget audieners are best ming, no mae emissions k the discusstrics that cou

n a very simunderstandi

mass consumnment, ener

d resilience to

TE

r centuries. Dand maintain

for improving

00% solution

useful when ces vary in able to rela

atter where ingenerated wion to field

uld be used.

mple and objeing about wher products

rgy efficiencyo dairy syste

Dairy ning

g the

n and

they their

ate to n the

within level.

ective hat is so to y and ms.

The EuropSustainabilityCommission efforts.

The EIP-AGforestry seresearch and

EIPs aim toinitiatives anfunding sourc

the the

An EIP AGREIP-AGRI neWorking on around 20 exbusinesses a

The concret

to list

to res

to proothto

Results are given Focus G

Experts are based on histherefore doe *More detailson: http://ec.e

pean Innovay' (EIP-AGRI) in a bid to pro

GRI aims to catctors by bring

d innovation pro

o streamline, simnd complementces are particula

e EU Research ae EU Rural Deve

RI Focus Grouetwork, which a narrowly defxperts (such asnd NGOs) to ma

te objectives o

take stock of ting problems an

identify needssearch;

propose prioriojects for Operher project formdisseminate the

normally publisGroup.

selected baseds or her personaes not represen

s on EIP-AGRI

europa.eu/agr

tion Partneris one of fiv

omote rapid mo

talyse the innovging research ojects as well as

mplify and bettt them with acarly important f

and Innovation felopment Policy.

up* is one of sis funded undfined issue, Focs farmers, advisap and develop

of a Focus Gro

the state of arnd opportunitiess from practice

ities for innovarational Groups mats to test solue practical know

shed in a report

d on an open caal knowledge ant an organisatio

Focus Group ai

riculture/eip/f

rship 'Agricultve EIPs launcodernisation by

vation process inand practicethrough the EI

ter coordinate ections where nfor the EIP-AGR

framework, Hor.

several differener the EU Rurcus Groups temsers, researchersolutions within

oup are:

rt of practice as; e and propose

ative actions bworking under

utions and oppowledge gathered

within 12-18 m

all for interest. End experience inon or a Member

ims and proces

focus-groups/

tural Productivhed by the Estepping up in

n the agricultucloser toget

P-AGRI network

existing instrumnecessary. Two

RI:

rizon 2020,

nt building blocral Developmenmporarily bring rs, up- and down their field.

nd research in

e directions fo

by suggesting r Rural Develop

ortunities, includd.

months of the lau

Each expert is an the particular State.

s are given in i

/charter_en.p

vity and European nnovation

ural and her – in k.

ments and o specific

ks of the nt policy. together

wnstream

its field,

r further

potential pment or ding ways

unch of a

appointed field and

its charter

pdf