efficacy of oae/abr protocol in identifying hearing loss
DESCRIPTION
EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Meeting Washington, D.C. February 20, 2004. Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under a Cooperative Agreement with: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING
HEARING LOSS
National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Meeting
Washington, D.C.February 20, 2004
![Page 2: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
under a Cooperative Agreement with:
The Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine
with a sub-agreement to:The University of Hawai`i
![Page 3: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CORE STAFF
Jean Johnson DrPH - Principal Investigator
Karl White, PhD - Research Coordinator
Judith E. Widen, PhD - Diagnostic Evaluation Coordinator
![Page 4: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SITE CO-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Judith Gravel, PhD: Jacobi Medical Center (Bronx, New York)
Michele James-Trychel, MEd: Arnold Palmer Hospital (Florida)
Antonia B. Maxon, PhD: Lawrence & Memorial (Connecticut)
Teresa Kennalley, MA: Via Christi Regional Medical Center (Kansas)
Lynn Spivak, PhD: Long Island Jewish Health System (New York)
Maureen Sullivan-Mahoney, MA: Good Samaritan Hospital (Ohio)
Betty Vohr, MD: Women & Infants Hospital (Rhode Island)
Yusnita Weirather, MA: Kapi`olani Medical Center (Hawai`i)
![Page 5: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CDC CONSULTANTS
Krista Biernath, MD Technical Advisor
Lee Ann Ramsey, BBA, GCPH
Program Advisor
![Page 6: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Background:
Conclusion of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Panel:
“ (3) the preferred model for screening should begin with an evoked otoacoustic emissions test and should be followed by an auditory brainstem response test for all infants who fail the evoked otoacousticemissions test.”
NIH Consensus Statement March 3, 1993
![Page 7: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
RESEARCH QUESTION
Does this two-stage procedure
miss
a significant number of babies with
a congenital hearing loss?
![Page 8: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CRITERIA for SELECTION of CRITERIA for SELECTION of BIRTHING SITESBIRTHING SITES
2,000 or more births per year Established newborn hearing screening
program with at least six month history of success
Historical refer rates of less than 10% for OAE and 4% for ABR
Success in obtaining follow-up on 90% or more of referrals
Ethnic and socio-economic distribution similar to US population
![Page 9: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PROJECTED SAMPLE SIZE
53,889 Annual Births
1,616 Eligible (Refer on OAE, Pass ABR)
1,500 Consent to participate; and family speaks either English or Spanish
1,000 Babies return for complete diagnostic testing
![Page 10: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
BIRTHING CENTERS 2001 - 2003 BIRTH CENSUS
Name of Hospital Enrollment Period Number of Births Arnold Palmer 06/01/2001 – 12/31/2002 16,608
Good Samaritan 06/01/2001 – 01/31/2003 9,393
Jacobi Medical 09/20/2001 – 01/31/2003 4,747
Lawrence & Memorial 06/27/2001 – 03/31/2003 1,380
Long Island Jewish 05/01/2001 – 01/31/2003 10,424
Kapi`olani Medical 05/15/2001 – 01/31/2003 9,252
Via Christi 05/01/2001 – 01/31/2003 6,217
Women & Infants 05/01/2001 – 01/31/2003 16,623
Huntington 05/01/2001 – 01/31/2003 3,384
Northshore 05/01/2001 – 01/31/2003 10,224
Total Birth Census for Enrollment Period 88,252
![Page 11: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PROCESSPROCESS Eligible babies identified following
newborn hearing screening. Parents contacted and research study
explained. Consent obtained from families. Enrollment data collected. Contact maintained with family at 2, 4, &
6 months of age via post cards.
Baby seen for audiological diagnostic evaluation between 7-9 months of adjusted age.
![Page 12: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DATA BEING COLLECTED
Birthdate Bronchio-pulmonary Dsplasia
Gender Mechanical Ventilation >7 Days
Birth Weight ECMO
Gestational Age Number of Children in Home
APGAR Scores Number of Adults in Home
Days in NICU Total Household Income
Malformations of the Head and Neck Child’s Race/Ethnicity
Syndrome Associated with Hearing Loss Health Insurance
In-utero Infections Family History of Hearing Loss
![Page 13: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CURRENT ENROLLMENT STATUS
1,572 Infants Enrolled as of September 2003
Exceeded Target Enrollment
![Page 14: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PERCENTAGE of CURRENT SAMPLE at EACH
PARTICIPATING HOSPITAL
![Page 15: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2 5 1280
146
281361
429512
603679
750810
873933
9871,043
1,1171,214
1,3021,377
1,4471,5171,5601,561
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Jan-01
Mar-01
May-01
Jul-01
Sep-01
Nov-01
Jan-02
Mar-02
May-02
Jul-02
Sep-02
Nov-02
Jan-03
Month & Year of Birth
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
uenc
y
CUMULATIVE ENROLLMENTAs of September 2003Goal: 1,500 infants
![Page 16: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CHILD ETHNICITY(Percentage of Current Sample)
![Page 17: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
HEALTH INSURANCE STATUS
(percentage of current sample)
![Page 18: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
6.9
3.6
10.1 10.8 9.8
12.9
31.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
<5000$ 5,000 -9,999$
10,000 -19,999$
20,000 -29,999$
30,000 -39,999$
40,000 -49,999$
50,000 and >
Income in baby's household/year
Perc
ent
Annual Income in Baby’s Household
![Page 19: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
AUDIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
Visual reinforcement audiometry
Tympanometry
EOAE – either TOAE or DPOAE
![Page 20: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
VRA PROTOCOLVRA PROTOCOL
Well-defined, detailed Well-defined, detailed protocolprotocol
Responses at 500, 1K, 2K, 4K Responses at 500, 1K, 2K, 4K HzHz
Response levels of 15 dB HLResponse levels of 15 dB HL
![Page 21: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
885 Diagnostic EvaluationsCompleted
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATIONS
![Page 22: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
1847
101137
185224
268308
337366
401435
478518
555602
659
716758
793818
846866 874 883 885
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Behavioral Evaluations by Month Completed
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
uenc
yBehavioral Evaluations as of January 29, 2004
![Page 23: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATIONS(percentage completed at each participating
hospital)
![Page 24: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
EXPANDED STUDY
Comparison Group: Refer/Refer Babies who failed both OAE and ABR
and were referred for a diagnostic evaluation
Same enrollment data
Results of audiological diagnostic evaluations
![Page 25: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
VALUE of EXPANDED VALUE of EXPANDED STUDYSTUDY
Enables study to determine what Enables study to determine what proportion that babies with a hearing loss proportion that babies with a hearing loss from the refer/pass group represent of all from the refer/pass group represent of all babies identified with hearing loss in the babies identified with hearing loss in the sample cohort.sample cohort.
Additional data provides an accurate Additional data provides an accurate estimate of the proportion of all babies estimate of the proportion of all babies with congenital hearing loss who are with congenital hearing loss who are being missed by the two-stage OAE/ABR being missed by the two-stage OAE/ABR protocol.protocol.
![Page 26: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
3 5 11 3163 81
112145
177209
239272291312337
367374389422443
484529
557583
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Jan-01
Mar-
01
May
-01Ju
l-01
Sep-01
Nov-01
Jan-02
Mar-
02
May
-02Ju
l-02
Sep-02
Nov-02
Jan-03
Month & Year of Birth
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
uenc
y
ATPM EXPANDED STUDY:Cumulative EnrollmentAs of January 2004
![Page 27: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Number of Inactivated Infants Number of Inactivated Infants by Monthby Month
152
214237
277 278
322 330346 353
377
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct
Months
Num
ber
of in
activ
ated
infa
nts
![Page 28: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
REVISED TIME LINEREVISED TIME LINE
Enrolled babies through January 2003.Enrolled babies through January 2003.
Complete evaluations by January 2004.Complete evaluations by January 2004.
Investigators analyze data in March Investigators analyze data in March 2004.2004.
Present results in May 2004.Present results in May 2004.
![Page 29: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Are we missing Are we missing babies with babies with
existing existing screening screening
equipment? equipment?
If so how many If so how many and of what type? and of what type?
![Page 30: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What is the What is the significance of significance of variable pass-variable pass-
refer rates refer rates associated with associated with
different different screening screening devices devices
(AOAE and (AOAE and AABR)?AABR)?
![Page 31: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
What Kind of Babies will be foundCongenital hearing lossLate-onset loss
Study Design ImprovementsDiagnostic ABR for all babies who
failed OAE regardless of AABR resultLarger sample size
![Page 32: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Would the follow-Would the follow-up of high- risk up of high- risk babies improve babies improve
the sensitivity of the sensitivity of the screening the screening
tests in detecting tests in detecting mild forms of mild forms of hearing loss?hearing loss?
![Page 33: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What is the cost What is the cost effectiveness of effectiveness of
different different screening screening protocols?protocols?
![Page 34: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Does ASSR have Does ASSR have a role in the a role in the
screening and screening and assessment of assessment of
infants?infants?
![Page 35: EFFICACY of OAE/ABR PROTOCOL in IDENTIFYING HEARING LOSS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081517/56814cf5550346895db9f8de/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Auditory Auditory NeuropathyNeuropathy
How many of the babies in How many of the babies in our sample who passed AOAE our sample who passed AOAE would have been identified as would have been identified as
at risk for AN if we had at risk for AN if we had tested all with AABR?tested all with AABR?
Should we use different Should we use different screening protocols in the screening protocols in the
NICU than WBN?NICU than WBN?