effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

11
Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device Harold A. Caparida Jhun Bryan V. Cenabre Raldey T. Lape ___________________________________________________________________ Computer Engineering Department College of Engineering Education University of Mindanao September 7, 2013

Upload: harhar-caparida

Post on 26-Dec-2014

207 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Harold A. CaparidaJhun Bryan V. Cenabre

Raldey T. Lape___________________________________________________________________

Computer Engineering DepartmentCollege of Engineering Education

University of MindanaoSeptember 7, 2013

Page 2: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Statement of the Problem

Specifically, to attain the following objectives:

• To determine the average values using the following parameters for the floating sensor design:

a) Water level:

• Actual Reading;

• Displayed Reading; and

• Transmitted Reading

b) Response time of the system

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 3: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Statement of the Problem

• To determine the average values using the following parameters for the ultrasonic sensor design:– Water level:

• Actual Reading;• Displayed Reading; and• Transmitted Reading

– Response time of the system

• To determine the physical specifications of the designs, namely:– Floating Sensor; and– Ultrasonic Sensor

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 4: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Statement of the Problem

• To identify the cost to develop the designs, namely:

– Floating Sensor; and

– Ultrasonic Sensor

• To determine if there exists a significant difference in the actual, displayed and transmitted values of the water level reading for the floating sensor design.

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 5: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Statement of the Problem

• To determine if there exists a significant difference in the actual, displayed and transmitted values of the water level reading for the ultrasonic sensor design.

• To determine if there exists a significant difference in the response time of the system for the floating sensor and the ultrasonic sensor designs

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 6: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Table 1. The Average Values of Parameters Using the Floater Design

Parameters Averages

a) Water Level

Actual Reading 121.50 inches

Displayed Reading 121.50 inches

Transmitted Reading 121.50 inches

b) Response Time 24 seconds

Table 2. The Average Values of Parameters Using the Ultrasonic Sensor

Parameters Averages

a) Water Level

Actual Reading 87.50 inches

Displayed Reading 87.50 inches

Transmitted Reading 87.50 inches

b) Response Time 359 seconds________________________________________________________________________________________

Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 7: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Table 5. The Costs to Develop the Designs

Design Development Cost

Floater Design ₱ 8296.50

Ultrasonic Sensor Design ₱ 7680.00

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 8: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Table 6. Analysis of Variance on Water Level Readings using the Floater Design

Source of

Variationdf SS MS

F – value

Computed Tabular

Between

Groups2 0 0 0 3.59

Within Group 17 42 072.41 2 474.85 α = 0.05

Total 19 42 072.41

Table 7. Analysis of Variance on Water Level Readings using the Ultrasonic Design

Source of

Variationdf SS MS

F – value

Computed Tabular

Between

Groups2 0 0 0 3.59

Within Group 17 21 820.32 1 283.55 α = 0.05

Total 19 21 820.32________________________________________________________________________________________

Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 9: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Table 8. t-test Result Comparing Floater Design and Ultrasonic Sensor Design on Response Time in Seconds

Response Time

in seconds ofn Mean

T – Value

df Decision

Computed Tabular

Floater Design 20 24 2.246 1.711** 24 Reject

Sonar Design 6 359

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 10: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Conclusion

The following are the conclusions of the researchers on testing the effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device:

• In water level reading of floating sensor design,

NO significant difference, H01 accepted

• In water level reading of ultrasonic sensor design,

NO significant difference, H02 accepted

• In response time between designs,

HAS Significant difference, H03 rejected

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device

Page 11: Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

Recommendation

For the further studies, the proponents suggest the following recommendations:

• The testing on the response time on the messaging to multiple recipients;

• The online application of the device’s status; and

• The addition of more trials for a more precise and accurate data gathering.

________________________________________________________________________________________Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device