stretching every student every day

Download Stretching every student every day

Post on 25-Dec-2014

61 views

Category:

Education

2 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Updated Bloom's Taxonomy.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. S t r e t c h i n g Every Student, Every Day Using Blooms Taxonomy (revised) to examine HOW we teach Beachwood City Schools
  • 2. Move from WHAT to HOW Two years PD spent examining curriculum WHAT we teach Shift the PD focus from WHAT we are teaching to HOW we are teaching
  • 3. The Taxonomy Table Taken from: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - Anderson et al. (2001) Taxonomy Table utilizes two Dimensions: Knowledge Dimension Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Meta-cognitive Cognitive Process Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create
  • 4. Starts with Assessment, Backs into Instruction Step 1: Apply the taxonomy to an assessment What type of knowledge will be assessed? What type of cognition will be assessed? Step 2: Examine the teaching that will prepare students for that assessment What type of knowledge will be taught? What type of cognition will students be taught to use/engage in? (Verb Tense is Intentional)
  • 5. Starts with Assessment, Backs into Instruction Step 3: Ask about the teaching unit Does HOW I will teach this align with WHAT I am assessing? Is my teaching differentiated? Does it offer students opportunities to engage at an appropriate level/in an appropriate manner given their prior knowledge and/or skill set? Am I stretching every student, every day? If any answer is No ADJUST!
  • 6. Starts with Assessment, Backs into Instruction Step 4: Ask more broadly Do my assessments, formal and informal, over the course of a unit/grading period/semester/school year land in enough places on the taxonomy? Does my instruction land in enough places on the taxonomy? Am I stretching every student, every day? If any answer is No ADJUST!
  • 7. What this PD Initiative Presumes This PD work presumes that examining ones teaching closely against a taxonomy of knowledge and cognitive processes will lead to instructional improvements in differentiation and rigor. It also presumes that working in collaboration with ones grade level or content area peers (in a PLC) will aid in this process.
  • 8. Moving forward In PLCs throughout the year, we are looking to our team leaders and coordinators to lead this effort. We want them to facilitate meetings that follow these steps utilizing their own assessments and lesson plans as examples and utilizing our teachers own work as well. Principals are critical to this effort too they will tie this initiative in with the evaluation cycle, making sure that everyone remains focused on stretching every student, every day.
  • 9. The Taxonomy Table Source: Anderson et al. (2001) N o u n s Verbs
  • 10. Examples Learning Objective Students will be able to differentiate between different forms of government. or as an Assessment Question Explain the differences between republican and democratic forms of government. Verb differentiate Cognitive Process Dimension 4 Analyze, Section 1 Differentiating Noun forms of government Knowledge Dimension B Conceptual, Section A Knowledge of classifications and categories
  • 11. The Taxonomy Table Source: Anderson et al. (2001) N o u n s Verbs X
  • 12. Examples Multiple Choice Assessment Question Which of the following is a strategy for decoding a word? Circle the best choice. Verb Circle Cognitive Process Dimension 1 - Remember, Section 1 Recognizing Noun strategy Knowledge Dimension D Meta- cognitive, Section A Strategic knowledge
  • 13. The Taxonomy Table Source: Anderson et al. (2001) N o u n s Verbs X
  • 14. Examples Assessment Question Calculate the lengths of each side of this right triangle. Show your work. Verb Calculate Cognitive Process Dimension 3 - Apply, Section 1 Executing Noun lengths Knowledge Dimension C Procedural, Section B Knowledge of subject-specific techniques and methods.
  • 15. The Taxonomy Table Source: Anderson et al. (2001) N o u n s Verbs X
  • 16. Examples Staying with this Assessment Question Calculate the lengths of each side of this right triangle. Show your work. What prior knowledge does this require? Cognitive Process Dimension 1 - Remember / Knowledge Dimension A Factual Remembering mathematical terminology - right triangle Cognitive Process Dimension 2 - Understand / Knowledge Dimension B Conceptual Understanding a mathematical principle Pythagorean theorem
  • 17. The Taxonomy Table Source: Anderson et al. (2001) N o u n s Verbs X X X
  • 18. Taking it further After examining your assessment, look at the teaching that will prepare students for it What types of knowledge will be taught? What types of cognition will students be taught to use/engage in? Ask about the teaching youve planned Does HOW I will teach this align with WHAT I am assessing? Is my teaching differentiated? Does it offer students opportunities to engage at an appropriate level/in an appropriate manner given their prior knowledge and/or skill set? Am I stretching every student, every day?
  • 19. S t r e t c h i n g Every Student, Every Day Using Blooms Taxonomy (revised) to examine HOW we teach Afternoon Session
  • 20. Your Assessment Recall of factual knowledge has its place no value judgment being made Over the course of any one curriculum unit, would you find that your assessments did not span across several areas of the taxonomy table? What about your teaching? If you looked closely at your teaching over a unit, quarter or semester, would you find that you asked students to engage in cognitive processes across the table? Do you teach your students to think meta-cognitively? Do they know how they know what they know?
  • 21. The Taxonomy Table Source: Anderson et al. (2001) N o u n s Verbs
  • 22. To be completed INDIVIDUALLY Apply the taxonomy to your assessment What type of knowledge will be assessed? Are there different types of knowledge assessed? What type of cognition will be assessed? Are there different types of cognitive processes being tapped?
  • 23. Present to your Department Describe your assessment to your colleagues Describe how you came to your conclusions about the type of knowledge and cognitive process assessed Open up for discussion Alternative explanations? Questions about instruction leading up to this? Ideas about prior knowledge needed? Other
  • 24. Where we are headed Department Meetings move this from a focus on assessment to a focus on instruction Evaluations evaluators will keep the focus on rigorous, differentiated instruction November and January Inservice c

Recommended

View more >