edr inc. count: 1 records. orphan summary city edr id site ... · columbia s118719833 best cleaners...

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ORPHAN SUMMARY

City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)

Count: 1 records.

COLUMBIA S118719833 BEST CLEANERS 1900-C SHADY BROOK PLAZA II 38401 PRIORITYCLEANERS

TC4962470.2s Page 9

EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.

100 kV

69 kV


MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

SearchTargetDistance Total

Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS

Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL

Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF

Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG

Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL

Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS

State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS

State and tribal landfill and/orsolid waste disposal site lists

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST_LUST CO

TC4962470.2s




State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST

State and tribal institutionalcontrol / engineering control registries

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SRP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP

State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS

Local Lists of Landfill / SolidWaste Disposal Sites

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS

Local Lists of Hazardous waste /Contaminated Sites

0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PRIORITYCLEANERS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DEL SHWS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL

Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HIST UST

Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2

Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS

TC4962470.2s




0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS

Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto

TC4962470.2s




1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES

Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST

1 0 0 0 0 1 0- Totals --

NOTES:

TP = Target Property

NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance

Sites may be listed in more than one database

TC4962470.2s

TC4962470.2s

1 EDR Hist CleanerC&C CARPET CLEANING 1018901420SE 302 CALDWELL DR N/A< 1/8 COLUMBIA, TN 38401

Relative:Lower

Click here for full text details

0.080 mi.423 ft.

MAP FINDINGSMap IDDirection

EDR ID NumberDistanceEPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

ED

R Inc.

TN AIRS Listing of Permitted Sources Department of Environment & Conservation 08/01/2016 08/02/2016 09/13/2016TN AST Aboveground Storage Tanks Department of Environment and Conservation 10/01/1999 10/12/1999 11/05/1999TN BROWNFIELDS Superfund VOAP Listing Department of Environment & Conservation 06/27/2016 07/08/2016 09/14/2016TN CDL Registry of Contaminated Properties Department of Environment & Conservation 04/11/2017 05/03/2017 06/01/2017TN DEL SHWS Deleted State Hazardous Waste Sites Department of Environment & Conservation 06/27/2016 07/08/2016 09/14/2016TN DRYCLEANERS Registered Facilities List Dept. of Environment & Conservation 03/31/2017 04/19/2017 05/25/2017TN ENG CONTROLS Engineering Control Sites Department of Environment & Conservation 03/14/2017 03/16/2017 06/01/2017TN HIST UST Underground Storage Tank Database Department of Environment & Conservation 03/02/2017 05/19/2017 06/01/2017TN HIST_LUST CO Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Sites Department of Environmental Conservation, Col 10/18/1994 10/24/1994 12/30/1994TN INST CONTROL Institutional Control Sites Department of Environment & Conservation 03/14/2017 03/16/2017 06/01/2017TN LEAD CERT Lead Safe Housing Registry Department of Environment & Conservation 02/21/2017 02/21/2017 03/23/2017TN LIENS Liens Information Department of Environment & Conservation 03/10/2015 04/07/2015 04/30/2015TN LUST Fund Eligible Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Department of Environment and Conservation 03/01/2017 05/19/2017 06/01/2017TN LUST TRUST LUST TRUST Fund Database Department of Environment & Conservation 03/01/2017 05/19/2017 06/01/2017TN NPDES Permitted Facility Listing Department of Environment & Conservation 02/22/2017 02/22/2017 03/23/2017TN PRIORITY CLEANERS DCERP Remediation Sites Listing Department of Environment & Conservation 09/15/2016 10/18/2016 12/05/2016TN RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Environment and Conservation 07/01/2013 01/15/2014TN RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan Department of Environment and Conservation 07/01/2013 01/03/2014TN SHWS Promulgated Sites Department of Environment & Conservation 06/27/2016 07/08/2016 09/16/2016TN SPILLS State Spills Department of Environment & Conservation 01/05/2015 01/06/2015 02/10/2015TN SRP State Remediation Program List Department of Environemtn & Conservation 04/03/2017 04/04/2017 06/01/2017TN SWF/LF Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Department of Environment and Conservation 03/14/2017 03/16/2017 06/01/2017TN SWRCY Recycling Facilities Listing Department of Environment & Conservation 04/14/2016 04/15/2016 05/18/2016TN UST Facility and Tank Report Department of Environment and Conservation 03/02/2017 05/19/2017 06/01/2017TN VCP Voluntary Cleanup, Oversight and Assistance Program Sites Department of Environmental & Conservation 04/03/2017 04/04/2017 05/25/2017US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 04/22/2013 03/03/2015 03/09/2015US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines Department of Interior 03/14/2017 03/17/2017 04/07/2017US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2013 02/24/2015 09/30/2015US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2005 08/07/2009 10/22/2009US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2014 09/10/2014 10/20/2014US CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 09/30/2016 11/18/2016 02/03/2017US CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 12/12/2016 12/28/2016 02/10/2017US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 06/02/2016 06/03/2016 09/02/2016US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 07/31/2012 08/07/2012 09/18/2012US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 04/05/2017 04/21/2017 05/12/2017US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 03/19/2017 03/21/2017 05/12/2017US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR, Inc.US EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 09/26/2016 09/29/2016 11/11/2016US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 11/07/2016 01/05/2017 04/07/2017US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 12/31/2005 02/06/2006 01/11/2007US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 01/01/2010 02/16/2010 04/12/2010US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA 04/04/2017 04/07/2017 05/12/2017

TC4962470.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date

US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 01/31/2015 07/08/2015 10/13/2015US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 02/22/2017 02/22/2017 05/12/2017US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 12/23/2016 12/27/2016 02/17/2017US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 12/28/2016 12/28/2016 02/03/2017US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 11/14/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 10/07/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 10/14/2016 01/27/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 11/14/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 10/01/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 09/01/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 10/17/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 10/06/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 11/14/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 10/07/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 10/14/2016 01/27/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 01/14/2017 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 10/01/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 09/01/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 10/17/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 10/06/2016 01/26/2017 05/05/2017US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 12/05/2016 01/05/2017 02/10/2017US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 02/18/2014 03/18/2014 04/24/2014US LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 12/28/2016 01/04/2017 04/07/2017US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 08/30/2016 09/08/2016 10/21/2016US NPL National Priority List EPA 04/05/2017 04/21/2017 05/12/2017US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 01/20/2016 04/28/2016 09/02/2016US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 02/01/2011 10/19/2011 01/10/2012US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 10/25/2013 10/17/2014 10/20/2014US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 04/05/2017 04/21/2017 05/12/2017US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 01/04/2017 01/06/2017 02/10/2017US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 12/12/2016 12/28/2016 02/10/2017US RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 12/12/2016 12/28/2016 02/10/2017US RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 12/12/2016 12/28/2016 02/10/2017




US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 12/12/2016 12/28/2016 02/10/2017US RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 12/12/2016 12/28/2016 02/10/2017US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 02/01/2017 02/09/2017 04/07/2017US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 11/25/2013 12/12/2013 02/24/2014US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017US SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 02/07/2017 04/19/2017 05/05/2017US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 02/07/2017 04/19/2017 05/05/2017US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 12/31/2009 12/10/2010 02/25/2011US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2014 11/24/2015 04/05/2016US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2012 01/15/2015 01/29/2015US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 09/14/2010 10/07/2011 03/01/2012US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 03/02/2017 03/02/2017 04/07/2017US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 09/30/2016 12/05/2016 02/10/2017US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 11/15/2016 11/29/2016 02/03/2017US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information Environmental Protection Agency 02/13/2017 02/15/2017 05/12/2017US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 09/30/2016 01/05/2017 02/10/2017US US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Environmental Protection Agency 11/15/2016 11/29/2016 02/03/2017US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 02/08/2017 02/28/2017 04/07/2017US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 12/05/2005 02/29/2008 04/18/2008US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites Department of Defense 10/25/2015 01/29/2016 04/05/2016

CT CT MANIFEST Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/30/2013 08/19/2013 10/03/2013NY NY MANIFEST Facility and Manifest Data Department of Environmental Conservation 01/30/2017 02/01/2017 02/13/2017PA PA MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2015 07/22/2016 11/22/2016RI RI MANIFEST Manifest information Department of Environmental Management 12/31/2013 06/19/2015 07/15/2015VT VT MANIFEST Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Department of Environmental Conservation 11/07/2016 11/18/2016 01/06/2017WI WI MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Natural Resources 12/31/2015 04/14/2016 06/03/2016

Oil/Gas PipelinesSource: PennWell CorporationPetroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and SpecialtyGases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This informationis provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrantits fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.

Electric Power Transmission Line DataSource: PennWell CorporationThis map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a besteffort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for anyparticular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.




US AHA Hospitals Sensitive Receptor: AHA Hospitals American Hospital Association, Inc.US Medical Centers Sensitive Receptor: Medical Centers Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesUS Nursing Homes Sensitive Receptor: Nursing Homes National Institutes of HealthUS Public Schools Sensitive Receptor: Public Schools National Center for Education StatisticsUS Private Schools Sensitive Receptor: Private Schools National Center for Education StatisticsTN Daycare Centers Sensitive Receptor: Child Care Listing Department Of Human Services

US Flood Zones 100-year and 500-year flood zones Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)US NWI National Wetlands Inventory U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceTN State Wetlands Wetland Inventory Department of Environment & ConservationUS Topographic Map U.S. Geological Survey

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION

© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC4962470.2s Page GR−4



TC4962470.2s Page A-1

geologic strata.of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of theGroundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics

2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and

Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:

forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in

2013Version Date:5943528 GODWIN, TNTarget Property Map:

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP

643 ft. above sea levelElevation:3945044.0UTM Y (Meters): 497629.2UTM X (Meters): Zone 16Universal Tranverse Mercator: 87.02619 - 87˚ 1’ 34.28’’Longitude (West): 35.651025 - 35˚ 39’ 3.69’’Latitude (North):

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES

COLUMBIA, TN 38401200 MCMEEN CIRCLECOLUMBIA HILLS APARTMENTS

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®

TC4962470.2s Page A-2

should be field verified.on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximitySource: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated

SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)E

leva

tion

(ft)

TP

TP0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 643 ft.

North South

West East

605584

615

655

644

635

645628612

643

634622

632600

653634

665

664628624

640

634 618

544

581

576

575

590

643

666 644

684

681

701

723 702

705

707

General WestGeneral Topographic Gradient:TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY

should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used toTOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic datausing site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on otherGroundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professionalGROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®

TC4962470.2s Page A-3

Not Reported

GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATIONGROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID

hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determinedflow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatoryEDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater

AQUIFLOW®

Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, shouldof groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist theHydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicatorHYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION

YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapGODWIN

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORYNWI ElectronicData CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property

Not Reported

Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type

FEMA FIRM Flood data47119C0170E

Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type

FEMA FLOOD ZONE

and bodies of water).Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, shouldSurface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION


TC4962470.2s Page A-4

> 60 inchesDepth to Bedrock Max:

> 60 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:

MODERATECorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:

Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.

water table is more than 6 feet.Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth toSoil Drainage Class:

textures.moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarseClass B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:

silt loamSoil Surface Texture:

MAURY Soil Component Name:

The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patternsSurvey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey informationThe U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY

Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. BeikmanGeologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION

Stratified SequenceCategory:PaleozoicEra:OrdovicianSystem:Middle Ordovician (Mohawkian)Series:O2Code: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)

at which contaminant migration may be occurring.Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speedGEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY

move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumesto rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soilusing site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessaryGroundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professionalGROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION


TC4962470.2s Page A-5

silt loamunweathered bedrockclaystratifiedsilty clay loamDeeper Soil Types:

No Other Soil TypesShallow Soil Types:

unweathered bedrocksilty clay loamSurficial Soil Types:

unweathered bedrocksilty clay loamSoil Surface Textures:

appear within the general area of target property.Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may

OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA

Min: 4.50Max: 6.00

Min: 0.60Max: 2.00

silt.more), Elasticlimit 50% orClays (liquidSOILS, Silts andFINE-GRAINED

Soils.200), Clayeypassing No.than 35 pct.Materials (moreSilt-Claysilty clay75 inches42 inches 4

Min: 5.10Max: 6.50

Min: 0.60Max: 6.00

50%), Lean Claylimit less thanClays (liquidSOILS, Silts andFINE-GRAINED

Soils.200), Clayeypassing No.than 35 pct.Materials (moreSilt-Claysilty clay loam42 inches29 inches 3

Min: 5.10Max: 6.50

Min: 0.60Max: 6.00

50%), silt.limit less thanClays (liquidSOILS, Silts andFINE-GRAINED

Soils.200), Clayeypassing No.than 35 pct.Materials (moreSilt-Claysilty clay loam29 inches16 inches 2

Min: 5.10Max: 7.30

Min: 2.00Max: 6.00

50%), silt.limit less thanClays (liquidSOILS, Silts andFINE-GRAINED50%), Lean Clay.limit less thanClays (liquidSOILS, Silts andFINE-GRAINED

Soils.200), Siltypassing No.than 35 pct.Materials (moreSilt-Claysilt loam16 inches 0 inches 1

Soil Layer Information

Boundary ClassificationPermeabilityRate (in/hr)

Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction(pH)


TC4962470.2s Page A-6

1/2 - 1 Mile ENETN6000000089674 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATIONFROM TPWELL IDMAP ID

Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

No PWS System Found

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION


No Wells Found

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION


1.000State DatabaseNearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS1.000Federal USGS

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION

SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE

opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming anEDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS



68

646

8 0

640

0

68

0

6

8 0

600

6 8 08 0 07 6 0

6 8 0

8

0 0

680

7 6 0

60

0 6 0 0

5

6 0

84

0

80

0

6 80

80

0

8

0 0

8

76

0

76

0

8 8 0

720

6

80

72

0

7

20

72

0

7 2 0

84

0

6 80

72

0

6 80

68

0

6 80

680

8

0 0

8 0 0

6 8 0

7 6 0

7

6 0

7 6 0

0

68

0

6

80

600

72

0

72

0

7 2 07 2 0

64

0

72

0

6 40640

64

0

72

06 4 0

64

0

56 0

6 80

6 806

4 0

6 8 0

6 8 0

68

0

68

0

68

0

6 8 0

68

0

6 8 06

80

6 8 0

6 80

68

0

68

0

68

0

6

8 0

680

6 8 0

6 4 0

6 4 0

6 4 0

6 4 0

64

0

6 4 0

6 4 0

64

0

6 4 0

68

0

680

60

0

60

0

6 0 0

6 0 06 0

0

60

0

6

0 0

6 0 0 6 0 0

64

0

64

0

6 4 0

64

0

6 4 0

6 4 0

6 4 0

6 4 0

64 0

6 4 06 4

0

6

4 0

6 40

6 4 0

64

0

64

0

64

0

64 0

6 0 060

0

6

0 0

64

0

6 4 06

40

68

0

64

0

600

64

0

64

0

64 0

64

064

0

600

60

0

6 00

560

560

5 6 0

5 6 0

5 6 0

56

0

56

0

560

5 6 0

5 6 0560

56

0

56

0

60

0

6 0 0

6 0 0

6 0 0

6 0 0

60

06

00

6 0 0

6 00 6

00

6 0 0

6 0 06 4 0

6

40

6

40

600

60

0

6 0 0

5 6 0

5 6 0

TN


GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®

Map IDDirectionDistanceElevation EDR ID NumberDatabase

1ENE1/2 - 1 MileLower

TN6000000089674TN WELLSClick here for full text details

Page: 1

10%50%40%7.550 pCi/LBasementNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor0%32%68%3.105 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor

% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea

Number of sites tested: 22

Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 38401

: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for MAURY County: 1

00031914.64.813MAURY

____________________________________________________________________________>100 pCi/L50-100 pCi/L20-50 pCi/L10-20 pCi/L4-10 pCi/L<4 pCi/LMaxAvgTotal SitesCounty

Radon Test Results

State Database: TN Radon

AREA RADON INFORMATION

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGSRADON

®

TC4962470.2s Page 2


TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)Source: United States Geologic SurveyEDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM correspondsto the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation datawith consistent elevation units and projection.

Source: U.S. Geological Survey

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION

Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates FloodInsurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMATelephone: 877-336-2627Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDRin 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland InventorySource: Department of Environment & ConservationTelephone: 651-532-0052

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION

AQUIFLOW Information SystemR

Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow informationEDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater

flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and hasextracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water tableinformation.

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION

Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic UnitSource: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digitalrepresentation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic DatabaseSource: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the nationalConservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soilsurvey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representationof soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)soil survey maps.

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic DatabaseSource: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)Telephone: 800-672-5559SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mappingscales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used toconstruct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates theoriginal soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and countynatural resource planning and management.

TC4962470.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

FEDERAL WATER WELLS

PWS: Public Water SystemsSource: EPA/Office of Drinking WaterTelephone: 202-564-3750Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at

least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement DataSource: EPA/Office of Drinking WaterTelephone: 202-564-3750Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after

August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surfacewater and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.

STATE RECORDS

County Water Wells in TennesseeSource: Department of Environment and ConservationTelephone: 615-532-0191Water well locations for the entire state.

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION

RADON

State Database: TN Radon Source: Department of Environment & ConservationTelephone: 615-299-9725Radon Test Results

Area Radon InformationSource: USGSTelephone: 703-356-4020The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected atprivate sources such as universities and research institutions.

EPA Radon ZonesSource: EPATelephone: 703-356-4020Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoorradon levels.

OTHER

Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilitiesSource: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656

Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greaterSource: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, preparedin 1975 by the United State Geological Survey



STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION

© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.



June 26, 2017 ** LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT ** Pg 1 of 1

Attention: P2284 / CONSULTING SOLUTIONS / CONSULTING SOLUTIONS

Kit #: 7847869 Result: 1.1 ± 0.3 pCi/lLocation: 1st Floor Columbis Hills Unit 1105

,

Analysis Note :Analyzed : 2017-06-21 at 1:00 pm

Started : 2017-06-15 at 4:00 pmEnded : 2017-06-17 at 4:00 pm

Hours/MST% : 48 hours 7.4% 70°F


,





,




Air Chek, Inc. 1936 Butler Bridge Rd, Mills River, NC 28759-3892 Phone: (828) 684-0893 Fax: (828) 684-8498

Including, when available:

• Radon Zone Map• Parcel Map• Aerial Maps• Topographical Maps• Contour Maps• Flood Map• Wetland Map

TENNESSEE

The U.S. EPA and the U.S. Geological Survey have evaluated the radon potential in the U.S. and have developed this map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to assist building code officials in deciding whether radon-resistant features are applicable in new construction. This map is not intended to be used to determine if a home in a given zone should be tested for radon. Homes with elevated levels of radon have been found in all three zones. All homes should be tested regardless of geographic location. The map assigns each of the 3,141 counties in the U.S. to one of three zones based on radon potential. Each zone designation reflects the average short-term radon measurement that can be expected to be measured in a building without the implementation of radon control methods. The radon zone designation of the highest priority is Zone 1.

Zone 1 Highest Potential (greater than 4 pCi/L)

Zone 2 Moderate Potential (from 2 to 4 pCi/L)

Zone 3 Low Potential (less than 2 pCi/L)

(Click on image for larger version)

Important: Consult the EPA Map of Radon Zones document (EPA-402-R-93-071) before using this map. This document contains information on radon potential variations within counties. EPA also recommends that this map be supplemented with any available local data in order to further understand and predict the radon potential of a specific area. This and other indoor air quality publications can be ordered through the IAQ INFO Clearinghouse.

Maury County - Parcel: 075 044.02

TN Comptroller - OLGSources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity

June 9, 20170 0.075 0.150.0375 mi

0 0.1 0.20.05 km

1:4,514

of 1

FloodInsights Report For:200 MCMEEN CIR, COLUMBIA,TN 38401

Geocoding Accuracy: S8 (Most Accurate) - single valid address match, point located at a single known address point candidate (Parcel)

Original Input Address: 200 MCMEEN CIR, COLUMBIA,TN 38401

Flood Zone Determinations (Non-Guaranteed)SFHA Within 250 feet of multiple flood zones?

Out No

Map Number47119C0170ECommunity Community_Name Zone Panel Panel_Dte COBRA

475423 COLUMBIA, CITY OF X 0170E April 16, 2007 COBRA_OUT

FIPS CensusTract

47119 0104.00

06/09/17This Report is for the sole benefit of the Customer that ordered and paid for the Report and is based on the property information provided by that Customer. That Customer's use of this Report is subject to the terms agreed to by that Customer when accessingthis product. No third party is authorized to use or rely on this Report for any purpose. THE SELLER OF THIS REPORT MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES TO ANY PARTY CONCERNING THE CONTENT, ACCURACY ORCOMPLETENESS OF THIS REPORT, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The seller of this Report shall not have any liability to any third party for any use or misuse of this Report.

Columbia Hills

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,[email protected]

Wetlands

Estuarine and Marine Deepwater

Estuarine and Marine Wetland

Freshwater Emergent Wetland

Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland

Freshwater Pond

Lake

Other

Riverine

June 9, 2017

0 0.1 0.20.05 mi

0 0.15 0.30.075 km

1:6,141

This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.

Inquiry Number:

Columbia Hills Apartments200 McMeen Circle

Columbia, TN 38401

June 12, 2017

4962470.3

Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark otice

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used hereinare the property of their respective owners.

page

The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 millionfire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which trackhistorical property usage in approximately 12,000American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress

University Publications of America

EDR Private Collection

The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™

Limited Permission To Make Copies

Sanborn® Library search results

06/12/17

Columbia Hills Apartments Consulting Solutions Inc.(CSI)200 McMeen Circle 401 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1200Columbia, TN 38401 Chicago, IL 60611

4962470.3 Chelsea McgrawThe Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Consulting SolutionsInc.(CSI) were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. Thecollection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc.(EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection.Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.

The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of theday this report was generated.

E09C-44DD-BC78NA

UNMAPPED PROPERTY

Columbia Hills Apartments

This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied targetproperty information, and fire insurance maps covering the target propertywere not found.

Certification #: E09C-44DD-BC78

Consulting Solutions Inc.(CSI) (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanyingthis report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR AccountExecutive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customerand their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannotbe concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTYEXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLYDISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USEOR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTALDATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Anyanalyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended toprovide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.Additionally the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal adviceCopyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map ofEnvironmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

4962470 3 2

Inquiry Number:

Columbia Hills Apartments200 McMeen Circle

Columbia, TN 38401

June 09, 2017

4962470.5

Search Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark otice

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein arethe property of their respective owners.

page

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assistenvironmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’sprofessional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photoper decade.

When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USEONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For moreinformation contact your EDR Account Executive.

2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP2010 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP2008 1"=500' Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP2007 1"=500' Flight Year: 2007 USDA/NAIP2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP1997 1"=500' Acquisition Date: March 21, 1997 USGS/DOQQ1992 1"=750' Flight Date: March 27, 1992 USGS1987 1"=500' Flight Date: June 05, 1987 USDA1979 1"=1000' Flight Date: April 06, 1979 USGS

06/09/17

Columbia Hills Apartments Consulting Solutions Inc.(CSI)200 McMeen Circle 401 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1200Columbia, TN 38401 Chicago, IL 60611

4962470.5 Chelsea Mcgraw

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannotbe concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTYEXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLYDISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USEOR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTALDATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Anyanalyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended toprovide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map ofEnvironmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

4962470 5 2

4962470.5

2012

= 500'

4962470.5

2010

= 500'

4962470.5

2008

= 500'

4962470.5

2007

= 500'

4962470.5

2006

= 500'

4962470.5

1997

= 500'

4962470.5

1992

= 750'

4962470.5

1987

= 500'

4962470.5

1979

= 1000'

Understanding Mold Investigations & Remediation

• What Services Should I Ask For?

• What Are Important Inspection Procedures ?

• Is Mold Sampling Helpful?

• What Information Should Be Provided From a Mold Inspection and Remediation?

Date: 05/2013

MOLD Guidelines for LEDIC Management Group

Table of Contents

Purpose…………………………………………………….3

Definition of Mold………………………………………...3

How Molds Grow…………………………………………3

Appearance of Mold……………………………………..4

Understanding Molds…………………………………....4

Health Concerns………………………………………….5

Assessing Risks…………………………………………….6

Identifying Mold…………………………………………...6 Why is a Thorough Visual Inspection and Assessment Necessary…………………………………………………..7

Correcting a Water Intrusion Problem and Developing a Mold Remediation Plan………………………………..7

When is Mold Sampling Necessary…………………….8

Sampling Plans…………………………………………….9

Information that should be provided as a Result of a

Mold Inspection and Assessment……………………….10

Corrective Actions………………………………………...11

Who Should Clean Up Mold……………………………..11

Inspection Services Checklist………………………..…12

Remediation………………………………………………13

Mold Remediation Checklist…………………………...13

References…………………………………………………14

Purpose The purpose of these guidelines is to help with the understanding of mold basics, the clean up of mold in a safe manner, and if necessary, selecting a remediation plan. These guidelines are intended for residential buildings. The US Environmental Protec-tion Agency (US EPA) has guidance for commercial and school buildings availa-ble at http://www/epa.gov/mold/pdfs/moldremediation.pdf

Definition of Mold Molds are fungi which occur naturally in the environment. Many different species of mold exist. Molds help break down dead materials and convert it back to organic matter which can be used by living organisms.

How Molds Grow Molds grow by digesting and destroying the material they grow on. They can be found almost anywhere and can grow on just about any material as long as conditions are favorable. For favorable growing conditions, mold needs nutrients (oxygen and moisture) and a material to grow on. Molds reproduce by making spores. These spores become air-borne, both outside and inside of buildings. If spores land on suitable material and conditions are favorable, the mold will begin to grow.

Appearance of Mold Molds grow in colonies and growth may take on different shapes and col-ors. Some molds may appear circular in growth while others may grow and spread to cover an area. Molds may appear brown in color. The ap-pearance depends on the species of mold present.

Understanding Molds Even though molds are everywhere, they may become a prob-lem when they begin to grow inside homes and buildings. Many building materials such as drywall, ceiling tiles and wood fram-ing contain cellulose, which is a material on which molds can grow. As molds grow on building materials they may become de-structive. Molds may grow un-noticed, above ceilings, behind walls, in attics and basements or in crawl spaces. Molds can cause staining of walls and ceilings and can begin to break down the studs and joists of buildings causing extensive proper-ty damage. Excessive moisture is an key ingredient which causes molds to grow. Sources of excess moisture may be plumbing leaks, leaking roofs or windows, high humidity, flooding or condensa-tion inside walls due to poor insulation.

Health Concerns It is important to remember, that individuals should consult their physician if they suspect they are experiencing health ef-fects resulting from mold exposure.

Individuals at the highest risk:

Those who have a pre-existing health condition (allergies; lung conditions such as asthma or emphysema)

Infants

The elderly

Molds emit spores and chemicals as part of their normal life cycle and some individuals may exhibit reactions when exposed to these materials. Mold spores are microscopic and, once airborne, can easily be inhaled. Spores may contain allergens that can cause irrita-tion to the nose, throat and respiratory tract.

In addition to allergens, molds may emit microbiological vola-tile organic compounds (MVOC’s). These chemicals usually have a strong and unpleasant odor and are associated with the musty smell that individuals equate to mold being present. These chemicals, when released into the air, can be inhaled, ingested or absorbed through the skin. MVOC’s can act as irri-tants and have been linked to headaches, nausea, dizziness and fatigue.

Assessing Risks There are factors that can be used to assess whether an in-creased health risk may be present.

These factors include:

Evaluating individuals for sensitivity to mold (children, el-derly and those with previously compromised health, are potentially more sensitive)

The extent of mold growth

The condition of mold growth

Identifying Mold Identifying mold in your home should always begin with a thor-ough visual inspection. An inspection can be done by a mainte-nance or management representative or a qualified environ-mental consultant. Excess moisture is always a key ingredient in mold growth. Examine the structure for water leaks and other sources of excess moisture. This is the first area to look for mold growth. Mold grows well on building materials that contain cellulose. Therefore, all building materials that contain cellulose (i.e., ceiling tiles, gypsum board, studs, wood products, etc.) should be inspected closely for signs of mold growth.

Why is a Thorough Visual Inspection and Assessment Necessary? A thorough visual inspection and assessment is the single most important procedure in obtaining information on the presence of a mold problem. A visual inspection and assessment will examine areas that may be impacted by water infiltration/leakage or excessive moisture and identify areas of mold growth.

Correcting a Water Intrusion Problem and Developing a Mold Remediation Plan If a mold problem is identified during the visual inspection, a plan to correct the water/moisture problem (s), along with a plan to clean up the mold, will need to be developed and im-plemented. Information obtained from a visual inspection can be used to help a professional consultant in the following ways:

Identifies the source of moisture so that it can be fixed prior to attempting to eliminate the old problem.

Assists in determining the extent of the mold growth.

If necessary, helps to formulate a mold sampling strategy (see section entitled “When is Mold Sampling/Testing Necessary?” to determine if further tests are advisable or necessary).

Helps in the development of an action plan to abate any mold contamination.

If the water that caused the mold, contained sewage or other hazardous substances, additional steps would be required in or-der to assess, clean and decontaminate the area.

When is Mold Sampling Necessary? Please note: If a visual inspection reveals the presence of mold, ad-ditional testing is not necessary.

Once a mold problem is identified, resources would be better used to correct any moisture problems and clean up mold contamination, ra-ther than for testing. However, if mold is not found during a visual inspection and is still suspected as being present testing may be nec-

essary. The cost of doing the sampling should be considered when deciding whether or not to conduct mold sampling. Test-ing should always be performed by a qualified person. The Local Health Department may be able to assist.

If mold sampling is necessary, samples may be collected from building materials, dust or from the air and will help determine the extent of the mold contamination. Collecting mold samples helps a consultant determine the mold species present concen-trations and if mold is actively growing.

Sampling Plans When sampling is necessary, it needs to be conducted in conjunc-tion with an investigation. This pro-vides as accurate assessment of ex-isting conditions in the building. To accomplish this, a specific plan for sampling should be developed.

The best sampling plans are those which are designed to sample in ar-eas of suspected mold growth and

should include information on why an area is sampled. Typical samples that may be collected by the consultant include: Bulk, Surface, Dust, and Air Samples.

Additional testing may include an evaluation of the relative humidity in the home and taking moisture readings of building materials in suspected areas. Testing of suspected surfaces and bulk samples of building materials may also be performed.

Information Which Should Be Provided as a Result of a Mold Inspection and Assessment The results of the mold inspection and assessment should be clearly communicated in a final report. The final report should have three components: A summary of the inspection that was conducted; a summary of the mold conditions; and a sum-mary of the moisture conditions identified.

Each report component is described below:

Inspection Summary Summarizes the scope of the inspection performed and specifies the areas which were inspected.

Details the techniques which were used to conduct the in-spection and assessment.

Moisture Information Summary Identifies the source(s) of water and/or moisture intrusion.

Specifies actions that need to be taken to correct any wa-ter and/or moisture intrusion problems.

Mold Information Summary Summation of the mold growth identified, including the specific locations, estimated size of the areas impacted and substrates affected by the growth.

The size of the areas affected by mold growth should be categorized into levels. This will help in developing a re-mediation work plan.

Information on other contaminants that could be present.

Corrective Actions If a mold problem is found, steps need to be taken to address such conditions. Remediation is necessary to prevent further property damage and further exposures. Specifics steps have been outlined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to remediate mold contamination. These include:

Identifying and correcting the source of moisture.

Removing and/or cleaning mold contaminated materials.

Removing the mold and ensuring the area is completely dry before performing any renovation or construction work.

The USEPA also notes that it is important not only to kill the mold but to also clean it up since even dead mold remains al-lergenic. See the references section for information on how to contact the USEPA.

Who Should Clean up Mold? Deciding “who” should perform mold remediation work is not al-ways easy. For small areas affected by mold growth (i.e., less than 10 square feet), building maintenance staff may be capable of performing the work. For larger areas (i.e., greater than 100 square feet), a qualified contractor who has expe-rience in mold or environmental

contamination clean up should be hired. A professional opin-ion should be sought for affected areas that fall between 10 square feet and 100 square feet.

Inspection Services Checklist The Inspection

Get quotes from a few different consultants/contractors.

Develop a contract for the work to be done.

Areas to be inspected for the source of excess moisture.

Areas to be assessed for signs of mold, excess humidity or excess moisture.

Will sampling be done? If so, an explanation of why sampling will be done and a sampling plan should be developed by the consult-ants/contractors.

If mold is found and finances allow, a remediation plan should be developed to repair damage that caused water intrusion, remove damaged items and building materials, remediate mold, and de-termine what pre-contamination levels the remediation contrac-tor should meet for final testing after remediation is complete.

Make sure a thorough visual inspection is conducted before any sampling or remediation is done.

As a result of the visual inspection: Determine the sources of excess moisture and what needs to be done to repair the home and correct the problem.

Determine if sampling/testing needs to be conducted, if it does, what type of sampling, how many samples, cost, etc.

Once inspection, testing and sampling are complete: Ask for the consultant to explain the report and interpret the results.

The consultant should develop a plan to remediate the mold.

Begin the process of hiring a mold remediation company.

Once mold remediation is complete, further testing should be done to ensure that mold levels within the home are back down to normal.

Remediation Working with mold can be hazardous, so regardless of who performs the work, work practices that protect the workers as well as the occupants need to be employed.

Workers need to be protected with gloves, a respirator, pro-tective clothing and goggles or some type of eye protection. Also, the work area may need to be contained to prevent the spread of mold to other areas.

Mold Remediation Checklist Get quotes from a few different contractors.

Select a contractor

Develop a contract for the work to be done.

Make sure you are aware of what will be done.

Make sure all porous items (i.e. Carpeting, paper items, upholstered furniture, etc.) that have mold growth should be removed and disposed of.

Remediation of contaminated structural components should be done (the items to be remediated should be specified in the remediation plan which was prepared by the consultant/contractor).

Once mold remediation is complete, further testing should be done to ensure that mold levels within the home are within normal ranges. Speak to your consultant/contractor prior to abatement regarding what levels will be consid-ered safe for re-occupancy.

Construction can begin to replace removed building com-ponents.

References Pictures: Some pictures are courtesy of Aerotech Laboratories and EMSL Laboratories

Information: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygien-ists, “Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control” ACGIH, 1330 Kemper Meadow Drive, Cincinnati, OH, 45240, ISBN: 882417-29-1, 1999.

New York City Department of Health, Bureau of Environ-mental and Occupational Disease Epidemiology, “Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments”, November 2000.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, indoor Enviorments Division, “Mold remedia-tion in Schools and Commercial Buildings” EPA 402-K-01-001, March 2001.

Helpful Information on the Web: http://epa.gov/mold/

For additional information, please refer to the LEDIC Opera-tions Handbook, Section 3.

LEDIC Management Group

2650 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Suite #3100

Memphis, TN 38118

Phone: 901.435.7700

Fax: 901.435.7701

Website: www.ledic.com

Smart, Caring, Focused...

www.consultingsolutionsinc.com

PROJECT NAME:

ADDRESS:

PROJECT #


200 McMeen CircleColumbia, Tennessee 38401

17-4063

6/23/2017

6/23/2017 6/23/2017

CSI emailed the City of Columbia Fire Marshal asking if there is any history of USTs or ASTs at the subject property. CSI recived an email from the City of Columbia Fire Marshal confirming that there are no history of USTs or ASTs at the subject property.

[email protected] [email protected]

From: Billy Ring [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:52 PMTo: Chelsea McGraw <[email protected]>Subject: RE: 200 McMeen Circle, Columbia, TN 38401

We do not show any records of any above ground or underground storage tanks at this location.

Billy RingAssistant Fire MarshalCity of Columbia700 North Garden Street931-560-1740 Phone931-560-1711 [email protected]

From: Chelsea McGraw [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 11:07 AMTo: Billy Ring <[email protected]>Subject: 200 McMeen Circle, Columbia, TN 38401

Hello,

Thanks so much for getting back to me so quickly, I know it was a bit of back and forth calling.

My company has been hired to perform an Environmental and Engineering Assessment of the abovereferenced property. In accordance with lender requirements, we are required to contact local


PROJECT NAME:

ADDRESS:

PROJECT #



17-4063

6/21/2017

6/21/2017 CSI contacted the Maury County Tax Assessor and spoke with a representative that confirmed that before the construction of the subject property was built the land was vacant.

931-375-4001


PROJECT NAME:

ADDRESS:

PROJECT #



17-4063

6/21/2017

6/21/2017 CSI spoke with a representative of Columbia Power and Water, who confirmed they own the transformers and provide electrical service to the subject property. PCB content is not known.

931-388-4833


PROJECT NAME:

ADDRESS:

PROJECT #



17-4063

6/21/2017

6/21/2017 CSI spoke with a representative of Columbia Power and Water, who confirmed they provide the water to the subject property and it meets EPA guidelines. This representative also confirmed they provide sanitary waste water / sewer and storm water discharge service for the subject property.

931-388-4833


PROJECT NAME:

ADDRESS:

PROJECT #



17-4063

6/21/2017

6/21/2017 6/21/2017

CSI contacted the City of Columbia and confirmed that there are no health code violations at the subject property. CSI searched Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and determined there is no history of water wells at the subject property.

931-560-1500 tdeconline.tn.gov

December 12, 2008

PHASE IENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

HAMPTON RIDGE APARTMENTS 300 McMeen Circle

Columbia, Tennessee 38401

Partner Project No. 80638

Prepared for

MMA FINANCIAL 74 Fern Street

Bangor, ME 04401

Prepared By

5723 Meadowcrest Drive Dallas, TX 75230 (214) 987-9982

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 80638 December 12, 2008 Page i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-05, the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312), the Fannie Mae DUS Guide, and set forth by MMA Financial for the Hampton Ridge Apartments property located at 300 McMeen Circle, within the incorporated City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee (the “subject property”). The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide MMA Financial with an assessment concerning environmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they exist at the subject property.

Property Description

The subject property is located around McMeen Circle, east of Theta Pike, in an area of the City of Columbia, Tennessee that is characterized by single- and multi-family residential land uses. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject property.

Address: 300 McMeen Circle

Columbia, Tennessee 38401

Historical/Additional Addresses: None

Assessor Parcel Number (APN): Map 075 Control Map 075 Parcel 044.02

Nature of Use: Multi-family residential

Number of Buildings: fifteen (15)

Number of Floors: Two

Type of Construction: Wood-frame

Building Square Footage (SF): 146,384 SF

Land Acreage: 12.52 acres

Date of Construction: 1997

Current Tenants: Residential tenants

The subject property is known as Hampton Ridge Apartments and is located at 300 McMeen Circle, within the incorporated City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee. The subject property consists of an irregular-shaped parcel of land that totals approximately 12.52 acres. The subject property is currently developed for multi-family residential use with fourteen (14) two-story apartment buildings that contain 140 units and total approximately 146,384 square feet of rentable space. The subject property also includes a one-story clubhouse/ leasing office building, with a fitness center and laundry area, outdoor pool, and uncovered asphalt-paved parking areas,

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 80638 December 12, 2008 Page ii

and landscaped areas. The subject property is designated for multi-family residential development by the City of Columbia and is considered a legal use in its current configuration. Available information indicates that the subject buildings were constructed in 1997. The subject property is currently utilized as a multi-family residential property known as the Hampton Ridge Apartments.

The properties located adjacent to the south and west of the subject property are developed for single and multi-family residential use. The properties located adjacent to the north and east of the subject property consist of undeveloped wooded land areas.

According to historical sources, the subject property was formerly undeveloped and covered with natural vegetation. City directories dated 1991 and 1996 had no listing for the subject roadway (McMeen Circle). Aerial photographs dated 1974 and 1996 depict the subject property as undeveloped land. City directories dated 1999 and 2003 indicate that the subject property has been utilized for multi-family residential purposes since its initial development in 1997. Aerial photographs dated 2006 depict the current multi-family residential buildings on the subject property.

According to information obtained from Maury County, depth to the high groundwater table is anticipated to be greater than 100 feet below ground surface. Based on local topography, groundwater in the general vicinity of the subject property is inferred to flow in a northeasterly direction.

Findings

A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance or petroleum product on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term REC includes hazardous substances and petroleum products even under conditions that might be in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include "de minimis" conditions that do not present a threat to human health and/or the environment and that would not be subject to an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. The following was identified during the course of this investigation.

Partner did not identify any recognized environmental conditions during the course of this investigation.

A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to an environmental condition which would have been considered a REC in the past, but which may or may not be considered a REC currently. The following was identified during the course of this investigation.

Partner did not identify any historical recognized environmental conditions during the course of this investigation.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 80638 December 12, 2008 Page iii

An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner that do not qualify as RECs, but warrant discussion.

Five Radon samples revealed analytical results at levels exceeding the EPA Action Level of 4.0pCi/L.

Conclusions, Opinions, and Recommendations

Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-05 of the Hampton Ridge Apartments property located at 300 McMeen Circle, in the City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 1.4 of this report.

Based on the presence of radon within multiple samples at levels exceeding the EPA Action Level and the location of the Property within EPA Radon Zone 1, long term testing for Radon for a period of six months is recommended.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 80638 December 12, 2008 Page iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 11.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 11.2 Scope of Work .............................................................................................................................. 11.3 Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 21.4 User Reliance ................................................................................................................................ 21.5 Limiting Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 3

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 42.1 Site Location and Legal Description ............................................................................................. 42.2 General Property Description ........................................................................................................ 42.3 Current Property Use .................................................................................................................... 52.4 Current Use of Adjoining Properties ............................................................................................ 62.5 Physical Setting Sources ............................................................................................................... 6

2.5.1 Topography ........................................................................................................................... 62.5.2 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................. 62.5.3 Soils/Geology ........................................................................................................................ 7

3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 83.1 Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................................ 83.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps ..................................................................................................... 103.3 City Directories ........................................................................................................................... 10

4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ..................................................................................... 124.1 Regulatory Agencies ................................................................................................................... 12

4.1.1 Health Department .............................................................................................................. 124.1.2 Fire Department .................................................................................................................. 124.1.3 Air Quality Management District ....................................................................................... 124.1.4 Regional Water Quality Control Board ............................................................................... 134.1.5 Department of Toxic Substances Control ........................................................................... 134.1.6 Building Department ........................................................................................................... 134.1.7 Planning Department ........................................................................................................... 134.1.8 Oil and Gas Exploration ...................................................................................................... 134.1.9 Other Agency ...................................................................................................................... 13

4.2 Mapped Database Records Search .............................................................................................. 145.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS ................................................... 18

5.1 Interviews .................................................................................................................................... 195.1.1 Interview with Owner ......................................................................................................... 195.1.2 Interview with Report User ................................................................................................. 195.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager ....................................................................................... 195.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants .................................................... 195.1.5 Interview with Others .......................................................................................................... 19

5.2 User Provided Information .......................................................................................................... 205.2.1 Title Records ....................................................................................................................... 205.2.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitation ......................................................... 205.2.3 Specialized Knowledge ....................................................................................................... 20

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 80638 December 12, 2008 Page v

5.2.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ........................................... 205.2.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues .................................................................. 205.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation ....................................................... 20

6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................................ 216.1 General Site Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 226.2 Potential Environmental Hazards ................................................................................................ 23

Complete table as necessary .......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.6.3 Non-ASTM Services ................................................................................................................... 25

6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) ............................................................................. 256.3.2 Lead-Based Paint ................................................................................................................ 256.3.3 Radon .................................................................................................................................. 266.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water ...................................................................................................... 276.3.5 Mold .................................................................................................................................... 27

6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance ............................................................................................. 287.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 298.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ............................................... 30

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Topographic Map

APPENDICES

Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B References Appendix C Records of Communication Appendix D Historical Documentation D-1 Aerial Photographs D-2 City Directories

D-3 Fire Insurance Maps D-4 Title Search Records Appendix E Regulatory Database Report Appendix F Laboratory Reports Appendix G Supporting Documentation Appendix H Fannie Mae Checklists

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 80638 December 12, 2008 Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-05 and AAI for the Hampton Ridge Apartments property located at 300 McMeen Circle, the City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee 38401. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this scope of work are described in the report.

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) is to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E-1527-05) affecting the subject property that: 1) constitute or result in a material violation or a potential material violation of any applicable environmental law; 2) impose any material constraints on the operation of the subject property or require a material change in the use thereof; 3) require clean-up, remedial action or other response with respect to Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products on or affecting the subject property under any applicable environmental law; 4) may affect the value of the subject property, and; 5) may require specific actions to be performed with regard to such conditions and circumstances. The information contained in the ESA Report will be used by Client to: 1) evaluate its legal and financial liabilities for transactions related to foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing, 2) evaluate the subject property’s overall development potential, the associated market value and the impact of applicable laws that restrict financial and other types of assistance for the future development of the subject property, and/or; 3) determine whether specific actions are required to be performed prior to the foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing of the subject property.

This ESA was performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E-1527-05 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B).

1.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E 1527-05. This assessment included: 1) a property and adjacent site reconnaissance; 2) interviews with key personnel; 3) a review of historical sources; 4) a review of regulatory agency records; and 5) a review of a regulatory database report provided by a third-party vendor.


If requested by Client, this report may also include the identification, discussion of, and/or limited sampling of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), mold, and/or radon.

1.3 Limitations

Partner warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. Partner believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the subject property is reliable. However, Partner cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

Some of the information provided in this report is based upon personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records, and the personal recollections of those persons contacted.

This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws other than the all appropriate inquiry provisions of the LLPs. Further, this report does not intend to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the subject property.

Environmental concerns, which are beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA as defined by ASTM include the following: asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint, radon, and lead in drinking water. These issues may affect environmental risk at the subject property and may warrant discussion and/or assessment; however, are considered non-scope issues. If specifically requested by the Client, these non-scope issues are discussed in Section 6.3.

1.4 User Reliance

MMA Financial, its employees, agents, successors and assigns may rely upon this report in evaluating a request for an extension of credit to be secured by the property (the "Mortgage Loan"). This report may also be used and relied upon by any actual or prospective purchaser, transferee, assignee, or servicer of the Mortgage Loan (or any portion thereof), any actual or prospective investor (including agent or advisor) in any securities evidencing a beneficial interest in or backed by the Mortgage Loan (or any portion thereof), any rating agency actually or prospectively rating any such securities, any indenture trustee, and any institutional provider(s) from time to time of any liquidity facility or credit support for such financing. In addition, this


report or a reference to this report may be included or quoted in any offering circular, private placement memorandum, registration statement or prospectus and Partner agrees to cooperate in answering questions by any of the above parties in connection with a securitization or transaction involving the Mortgage Loan (or any portion thereof) and/or such securities. This report has no other purpose and should not be relied upon by any other person or entity.

1.5 Limiting Conditions

The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM E1527-05.

Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below.

Partner requested information relative to deed restrictions and environmental liens, a title search, and completion of a pre-survey questionnaire from the Report User. This information was not provided at the time of the assessment.

Partner was not able to document the historical use of the subject property prior to 1974, since city directories had no listings for the site roadway prior to 1997, aerial photographs prior to 1974 were not reasonably ascertainable from local agencies and other historical sources such as Sanborn fire insurance maps or topographic maps did not provide coverage of the subject property. This data failure is not considered critical and does not change the conclusions of this report, as the 1974 and 1996 aerial photographs revealed the subject property to be undeveloped land. In addition, the adjacent and surrounding areas are also shown mostly as undeveloped land or land with small residential development to the east and south of the subject property.

The performance of this Phase I ESA was not limited in any other way. Partner was granted full and complete access to the subject property.


2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Site Location and Legal Description

The address of the subject property is 300 McMeen Circle, Columbia, Tennessee 38401. The subject property is located around McMeen Circle, east of Theta Pike, in an area of the City of Columbia, Tennessee that is characterized by single- and multi-family residential land uses. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject property.

According to the Maury County Assessor, the subject property is identified as Real Property Map 075 Control Map 075 Parcel 044.02

According to the Maury County Assessor, ownership of the subject property is currently vested in Great Atlantic Management Company.

2.2 General Property Description

The subject property is known as Hampton Ridge Apartments and is located at 300 McMeen Circle, within the incorporated City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee. The subject property consists of an irregular-shaped parcel of land that totals approximately 12.52 acres. The subject property is currently developed for multi-family residential use with fourteen (14) two-story apartment buildings that contain 140 units and total approximately 146,384 square feet of rentable space. The subject property also includes a one-story clubhouse/ leasing office building, with a fitness center and laundry area, outdoor pool, and uncovered asphalt-paved parking areas, and landscaped areas.

Type of units No. of Units

Unit Area (SF)

No. Vacant Units

Down Units

2 Bed / 2 Bath 92 988 SF 11 0

3 Bed / 2 Bath 48 1,156 SF 0 0

Total No. of Units 140 Total Rentable Area 146,384 SF

The subject buildings are rectangular structures that are oriented in various directions throughout the subject property. The subject buildings are of wood-frame construction with reinforced concrete foundations. The three-story building include common, open breezeways and entrances, while the two-story units include walkup, ground level entrances along the building front elevations. The building exteriors are finished with horizontal lap vinyl siding with areas of brick veneer, painted wood or vinyl trim. The roofs of the subject buildings are pitched and covered with composition roofing materials. The apartment entry doors are insulated metal doors in painted wood frames. Interior doors are hollow core wood in wood frames. Windows throughout the development are single-paned and aluminum-framed. The interior walls and ceilings are comprised of textured material and painted wallboard/drywall. Floors are covered with resilient flooring materials and carpet.


Vehicular access to the subject property is provided from Theta Pike by means of a paved roadway extending to the eastern perimeter of the subject property. McMeen Circle traverses the property in a circular pattern with buildings fronting along the roadway. The subject property provides asphalt-paved parking for approximately 223 automobiles, based on a physical count conducted at the time of the assessment. Landscaped areas are provided along the perimeters of the subject property and between the subject buildings; curbs are of raised concrete construction. Wheel stops on the subject property, where provided, are constructed of six-inch raised concrete curbs.

Columbia Power System provides electricity to the subject property. Natural gas is not provided to the subject property. The City of Columbia provides utilities to the subject property for sanitary sewer and domestic drinking water. Storm water is managed by a series of on-site storm drains that are interconnected and attached to a storm water system maintained by the City of Columbia. Sanitary wastewater discharged from the subject property is treated by the City of Columbia. Solid waste is disposed of by an independent solid waste disposal contractor.

Interior appliances provided in each apartment unit at the subject property consist of refrigerator, electric range and range vent hood, dishwasher, and garbage disposal. The mechanical system at the subject property is comprised of a split system for each apartment unit with one central unit and an exterior pad-mounted condenser located outside of each apartment unit. Hot water is supplied to each apartment unit by a 30-gallon electric water heater. Electrical service is 120/240 volt, single-phase service and appears to be adequate for the subject buildings and their current electrical loads. Electrical distribution wiring was reported and observed to be copper..

Fire suppression and life safety systems are provided as required by the City of Columbia Fire Department and the code in place at the time the subject buildings were constructed. The subject buildings are equipped with a hydraulically designed automatic fire sprinkler system. The sprinkler system is connected to a fire alarm panel that has communication abilities and is monitored by an outside contractor. The automatic fire suppression sprinkler system was last inspected by Bohn & Bohn Fire Protection in February 2008. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are provided throughout the subject buildings as required. The fire extinguishers throughout the common areas are maintained annually and were last inspected by ACME Fire & Safety in October 2008

The subject property was not identified in the regulatory database report. Please refer to Section 4.2. Please refer to Figure 1: Site Location Map, Figure 2: Site Plan, Figure 3: Topographic Map, and Appendix A: Site Photographs.

2.3 Current Property Use

The subject property is designated for multi-family residential development by the City of Columbia and is considered a legal use in its current configuration. Available information indicates that the subject buildings were constructed in 1997. The subject property is currently utilized as a multi-family residential property known as the Hampton Ridge Apartments.


2.4 Current Use of Adjoining Properties

The subject property is located in an area of the City of Columbia, Tennessee that is characterized by residential and recreational land uses. Partner observed the following land uses on properties located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property at the time of the assessment.

Direction Adjacent Property

North The property located adjacent to the north of the subject property consists of undeveloped, wooded lands.

South The property located to the south of the subject property is occupied by multi-family residential properties.

East The property located adjacent to the east of the subject property is occupied by a single-family residential property and open field areas followed by several small (fourplex) multi-family residential units.

West The property located adjacent to the north of the subject property consists of undeveloped, wooded lands.

None of the adjacent properties are listed in the regulatory database. Off-site properties within the search radii prescribed by ASTM E1527-05 are discussed in Section 4.2.

2.5 Physical Setting Sources

2.5.1 Topography

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Godwin, Tennessee Quadrangle 7.5-Minute series topographic map was reviewed for this assessment. This map was published by the USGS in 1990. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, the subject property is located at approximately elevation range of 640 to 680 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The subject property is located along a ridgeline and west slope in an area of rolling hills. The contour lines in the area of the subject property indicate the area moderately slopes to the west. No structures are depicted on the subject property. Rutherford Creek is located approximately one-half of a mile to the west of the subject property. No significant surface features are depicted on or adjacent to the subject property. The topographic map is provided as Figure 3 of this report.

2.5.2 Hydrology

The site is located within the Valley and Ridge Aquifers in the Appalachian Highlands Province. These aquifers mostly consist of carbonate rock type aquifers. The nearest surface water in the vicinity of the Property is Rutherford Creek located approximately 1/2 mile west of the Property. No settling ponds, lagoons, surface impoundments, wetlands or natural catch basins were observed at the Property during this investigation.


Information specific to the subject property regarding the depth to groundwater and direction of groundwater flow was not available for the subject area. However, according to information obtained from Maury County, depth to the high water table is anticipated to be in excess of 100 feet below surface level. Based on local topography, groundwater in the general area is inferred to flow in a westerly direction toward….

2.5.3 Soils/Geology

Based on the soil survey maps published by the USDA Soil Conservation Service (1978) for Masaury County, Tennessee, the Property is mapped as Maury silt loam. These soils are described as well drained, strongly acidic soils on the hillsides of the Central Basin. Slope and slowly permeable subsoils (sticky plastic clay) cause rapid runoff and erosion hazard. The estimated depth to bedrock at the Property is approximately 5 to 8 feet below the ground surface.

The Property is situated within the Tennessee Section of the Valley and Ridge Province of the Appalachian Highlands. This province is comprised of unconsolidated, coarse-grained deposits of Quaternary age (primarily of glacial origin) compose principal aquifers that cover the Paleozoic rocks throughout most of the Appalachian Highlands Physiographic Province.

2.4.4 Flood Zone Information

Partner performed a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. According to Community Panel Number 475423 0170E, dated April 6, 2007, the subject property appears to be located in Zone X, an area located outside of the 100-year and 500-year flood plains.

2.4.5 Oil and Gas Exploration

Partner did not identify any current or past oil and/or gas exploration activities during review of aerial photographs of the subject property and vicinity.


3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION

Partner obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources. A chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below.

Period/Date Source Description/Use

1974 to 1996 Aerial Photographs, City Directories, Interviews

Undeveloped

1997 through 2008 Aerial Photographs, Assessor Records, City Directories, Interviews

Multi-Family Residential

No potential environmental concerns were identified in association with the current or historical uses of the subject property or the adjacent properties.

3.1 Aerial Photograph Review

Partner obtained aerial photographs for use on this project from the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service and accessed via the internet at www.mapcard.com and www.mapquest.com. Aerial photographs dated 1974, 1996, and 2006 were provided for review. A summary of the previous uses of the subject property and surrounding properties is presented below. Please refer to Appendix D for copies of the aerial photographs reviewed for this assessment.

Date: 1974

Scale: 1” = 1,340’

Photo ID: 6-3S

Description: Property: The subject property appears to be cleared land with areas of apparent woods. The site appears undeveloped with no apparent structures present

North: The property located adjacent to the north of the subject property appears to include a cleared land area with an apparent small structure present.

East: The property located adjacent to the east of the subject property appears to be undeveloped and covered with natural vegetation.

South: The property located adjacent to the south of the subject property appears to include a cleared, undeveloped land area.

West: The property located adjacent to the west of the subject property appears to include a cleared, undeveloped land area with a band of trees extending across the site from east to west..

Surrounding: The surrounding vicinity appears to be largely undeveloped and covered with natural vegetation, with scattered residential properties.


Date: 1996

Scale: 1:6,000

Photo ID: Not provided

Description: Property: The subject property appears to be cleared land with areas of apparent woods. The site appears undeveloped with no apparent structures present. An apparent roadway extends across the site area from east to west.

North: The property located adjacent to the north of the subject property appears to include wooded, undeveloped land.

East: The property located adjacent to the east of the subject property appears to include wooded, undeveloped land.

South: The property located adjacent to the south of the subject property appears to include single-family residential properties fronting along the roadway.

West: The property located adjacent to the west of the subject property appears to include single- and multi-family residential properties fronting along the roadway.


Date: 2006

Scale: Not provided

Photo ID: Not provided

Description: Property: The subject property appears to be developed with the existing apartment buildings present.

North: The property located adjacent to the north of the subject property appears to include wooded, undeveloped land.

East: The property located adjacent to the east of the subject property appears to include wooded, undeveloped land. South: The property located adjacent to the south of the subject property appears to include single-family residential properties fronting along the roadway.

West: The property located adjacent to the west of the subject property appears to include single- and multi-family residential properties fronting along the roadway.



3.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps

Sanborn maps were originally created in the late 1800s and early 1900s for assessing fire insurance liability in urbanized areas of the United States. These maps include detailed town and building information.

Partner searched for Sanborn fire insurance maps at the Maury County Public Library in Columbia, Tennessee. No historic map coverage was found for the subject property or vicinity at the time of the assessment.

Partner requested Sanborn fire insurance maps from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. No Sanborn fire insurance maps were available at the time of the assessment. A statement from FirstSearch is included in Appendix D-3.

3.3 City Directories

City directories have been produced for most urban and some rural areas since the late 1800s. The directories are generally not comprehensive and may contain gaps in time periods.

Historical city directories were reviewed at the Maury County Public Library on December 4, 2008 for past names and businesses that were listed for the subject property. The findings are presented in the following table.

YEAR OCCUPANT LISTED ADJOINING PROPERTIES

2003 Hampton Ridge Apartments

North – No listing

East – No listing

South – Residential

West – Residential

1999 Residential listings along McMeen Circle


East – No listing



1996, 1991 No listings for McMeen Circle


East – No listing



Partner did not identify any environmentally sensitive listings for either the subject property address or for any of the adjacent property addresses.


3.4 Historical Topographic Maps

Historical topographic maps were not available at the time of the assessment. The historical use of the subject property was researched through other standard historical sources.


4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 Regulatory Agencies

Partner contacted local agencies, such as environmental health departments, fire departments and building departments in order to determine any current and/or historic hazardous materials usage, storage and/or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property. Additionally, Partner researched information on the presence of activity and use limitations (AULs) at these agencies. As defined by ASTM E1527-05, AULs are the legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: 1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the subject property; or 2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls (IC/ECs), are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property.

4.1.1 Health Department

Partner requested records for the subject property from the Maury County Public Health and Environmental Services Department. These records may contain evidence indicating current and/or historical hazardous materials usage, storage or releases as well as the presence of underground storage tanks.

No records regarding hazardous materials use or the presence of AULs on the subject property were found on file with the County of Maury at the time of the assessment.

4.1.2 Fire Department

Partner requested records for the subject property from the City of Columbia Fire Department on December 4, 2008. These records may contain evidence indicating current and/or historical hazardous materials usage, storage or releases as well as the presence of underground storage tanks.

No records regarding hazardous materials use or the presence of AULs on the subject property were found on file with the City of Columbia Fire Department at the time of the assessment.

4.1.3 Air Quality Management District

The Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation(TDEC) acts as the air quality management agency in the State of Tennessee. Partner researched the TDEC online databases in December 2008 for information regarding any Permits to Operate (PTO), Notices of Violation (NOV), or Notices to Comply (NTC) records for the subject property related to air emission equipment, which may include dry cleaning machines and underground storage tanks.


No records for the subject property address were found on file with the TDEC.

4.1.4 Regional Water Quality Control Board

The TDEC acts as the regional water quality control agency in the State of Tennessee. Partner researched the TDEC online database in December 2008 for information regarding any releases to the subsurface which may have impacted or threatened a body of water.

No records regarding a release or the presence of AULs on the subject property were found on file with the TDEC.

4.1.5 Department of Toxic Substances Control

The TDEC acts as the toxic substances control agency in the State of Tennessee. Partner researched the online databases in December 2008 for records of the subject property. These records may contain evidence indicating current and/or historical hazardous materials usage, storage or releases.

No records regarding a release or the presence of AULs on the subject property were found on file with the TDEC.

4.1.6 Building Department

Partner visited the City of Columbia Planning and Development Department on December 4, 2008 to request information regarding historical tenants and property use of the subject property.

No records for the subject property were found on file with the City of Columbia at the time of the assessment.

4.1.7 Planning Department

Partner visited the City of Columbia Planning and Development Department on December 4, 2008 to request information regarding historical tenants and property use of the subject property.

No records for the subject property were found on file with the City of Columbia at the time of the assessment.

4.1.8 Oil and Gas Exploration

Partner did not identify any current or past oil and/or gas exploration activities during review of aerial photographs of the subject property and vicinity.

4.1.9 Other Agency

No other agencies were contacted as part of this assessment.


4.2 Mapped Database Records Search

Information from standard federal, state, county, and city environmental record sources was provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Data from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as these data are released. The information contained in this report was compiled from publicly available sources and the locations of the sites are plotted utilizing a geographic information system, which geocodes the site addresses. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. Please refer to the radius map for a complete listing (Appendix E).

In some cases, location information supplied by the regulatory agencies is insufficient to allow the database companies to geocode facility locations. These facilities are listed under the non geocoded section within the EDR report.

The subject property was not identified in the regulatory database report.

Federal NPL

The National Priorities List (NPL) is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) database of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for priority remedial actions under the Superfund Program.

No NPL sites are located within one mile of the subject property.

Federal CERCLIS List

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) list is a compilation of sites that the EPA has investigated or is currently investigating for a release or threatened release of hazardous substances.

No CERCLIS sites are listed within one-half of a mile of the subject property.

Federal CERCLIS-NFRAP Sites List

The CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) List is a compilation of sites that the EPA has investigated, and has determined that the facility does not pose a threat to human health or the environment, under the CERCLA framework.

The subject property is not listed as a CERCLIS-NFRAP facility. No CERCLIS-NFRAP sites are reported within one half mile of the subject property.

Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List

The RCRA CORRACTS database is the EPA’s list of TSD facilities subject to corrective action under RCRA.

No RCRA CORRACTS facilities are listed within one mile of the subject property.


Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) TSD Facilities List

The RCRA Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSD) database is a compilation by the EPA of reporting facilities that treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste.

No RCRA TSD sites are listed within one-half of a mile of the subject property.

Federal RCRA Generator List

The EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program RCRA program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Generators database is a compilation by the EPA of reporting facilities that generate hazardous waste.

No RCRA Generator facilities are listed on the subject property.

Federal Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls (IC/EC)

The Federal IC/EC database is designed to assist the EPA in collecting, tracking, and updating information, as well as reporting on the major activities and accomplishments of the various Brownfield grant programs. The IC/EC sites are superfund sites that have either engineering or an institutional control in place. The data includes the control and the media contaminated.

No Federal IC/EC sites were found within one-half of a mile of the subject property.

Federal Emergency Notification System (ERNS)

The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national database used to collect information or reported release of oil or hazardous substances.

No ERNS sites were listed on the subject property or on the adjacent properties.

Tribal Lands

The Tribal Lands database consists of areas with boundaries established by treaty, statute, and/or executive or court order, recognized by the Federal Government as territory in which American Indian tribes have primary governmental authority. The Indian Lands of the United States map depicts areas of 640 acres or more, administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Included are Federally-administered lands within a reservation which may or may not be considered part of the reservation.

No Tribal Land sites were found within one mile of the subject property.

State/Tribal Sites

The State of Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation maintains a State Priority List (SPL) of sites considered to be actually or potentially contaminated and a State


CERCLIS-equivalent list (SCL) of sites under investigation that could be actually or potentially contaminated and presenting a possible threat to human health and the environment.

No SPL sites are listed within one mile of the subject property.

State Spills Sites (SPILLS)

The State of Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation maintains reports of sites that have records of spills, leaks, investigations and cleanups.

No SPILLS sites are listed within one-quarter of a mile of the subject property.

Solid Waste/Landfill Facilities (SWLF)

A database of SWLF facilities is prepared by the Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation.

No SWLF facilities are listed within one-half of a mile of the subject property.

State/Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tank List (LUST)

The State of Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation compiles lists of all leaks of hazardous substances from underground storage tanks.

No LUST sites are reported within one-half of a mile of the subject property.

State/Tribal Underground Storage Tank/Aboveground Storage Tank List (UST/AST)

The State of Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation compiles a list of UST and AST locations.

No registered UST/AST facilities are listed on or adjacent to the subject property.

State/Tribal VCP Sites

The Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation compiles a list of Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) sites.

No State/Tribal VCP sites were found within one-half of a mile of the subject property.

State/Tribal Brownfield Sites

The Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation compiles a list of Brownfield Sites.

The subject property is not listed as a Brownfield site. No Brownfield sites are listed within one-half of a mile of the subject property.


State Industrial Hazardous Waste (IHW) Sites

The Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation compiles a list of Industrial Hazardous Waste handlers located within the State of Tennessee.

The subject property is not listed as an IHW site. No IHW site is reported within one-half of a mile of the subject property.


5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS

In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the Brownfields Amendments), the user must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiry is not complete. The user is asked to provide information or knowledge of the following:

1. Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site. 2. Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or

recorded in a registry. 3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLPs. 4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not

contaminated. 5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property.6. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the

property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. 7. The reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA.

Fulfillment of these user responsibilities is key to qualification for the identified defenses to CERCLA liability. Partner requested our Client to provide information to satisfy User Responsibilities as identified in Section 6 of the ASTM guidance.

Pursuant to ASTM E 1527-05, Partner requested the following site information from MMA Financial (User of this report).

ITEMPROVIDED

BY USER

NOTPROVIDED

BY USER DISCUSSED

BELOW

DOES NOT

APPLY

Environmental Pre-Survey Questionnaire X

Title Records X

Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitation X

Specialized Knowledge X

Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues X

Identification of Key Site Manager X


Reason for Performing Phase I ESA

YES, SEE SECTION

1.1

Prior Environmental Reports X

Other X

5.1 Interviews

5.1.1 Interview with Owner

The owner of the subject property was not available to be interviewed at the time of the assessment.

5.1.2 Interview with Report User

Please refer to Section 5.2 below for information requested from the Report User. The information requested was not received prior to the issuance of this report. Because the Report User (Client) is a lender, it is understood that the Report User would not have knowledge of the property that would significantly impact our ability to satisfy the objectives of this assessment. The lack of this information is not considered to represent a significant data gap.

5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager

Property Manager Ms. Susan Rathbun indicated that she had no information pertaining to any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; or any notices from a governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products.

5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants

Interviews with past owners, operators, and occupants were not reasonably ascertainable. This constitutes a data gap; however, based on information obtained from other historical sources (as discussed in Section 3.0), this data gap is not expected to alter the findings of this investigation.

5.1.5 Interview with Others

As the subject property is not an abandoned property as defined in ASTM 1527-05, interview with others were not performed.


5.2 User Provided Information

5.2.1 Title Records

Partner requested title records from the User; however, title records were not provided for review.

5.2.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitation

Partner requested information from the User regarding knowledge of environmental liens and activity and use limitations (AULs) for the subject property. No environmental lien or activity and use limitation information was provided by the User at the time of the assessment.

5.2.3 Specialized Knowledge

Partner inquired with the User regarding any specialized knowledge of environmental conditions associated with the subject property. No specialized knowledge was provided by the User at the time of the assessment.

5.2.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information

Partner inquired with the User regarding any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community about the subject property that is material to recognizedenvironmental conditions in connection with the subject property. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information associated with the subject property was not provided by the User at the time of the assessment.

5.2.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues

Partner inquired with the User regarding any knowledge of reductions in property value due to environmental issues. Knowledge of valuation reductions associated with the subject property was not provided by the User at the time of the assessment.

5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation

No previous reports or other pertinent documentation was provided to Partner for review during the course of this investigation.


6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

The subject property was inspected by Don W. Davidson on December 4, 2008. The weather at the time of the site visit was overcast with rain and in the 30s (degrees Fahrenheit). The Property Manager was identified as Ms. Susan Rathbun, 931-380-5262. The Maintenance Supervisor was not onsite at the time of the site inspection. Ms. Rathbun accompanied Partner during field reconnaissance activities and provided information pertaining to the current operations and maintenance of the subject property.

All areas of the subject property were accessible at the time of the site inspection. There were no physical or visual obstructions of the subject property. Partner inspected 100% of the exterior areas of the subject property, 100% of the common areas at the subject property, and over 10% of the apartment units at the subject property as listed below.

APARTMENT UNITS OBSERVED –10% OBSERVED

Unit Type Comments/Issue

Occupied Units

301 2 Bedroom / 2 Bathroom Occupied – Good Condition











Vacant Units

1305 2 Bedroom / 2 Bathroom Vacant – Good Condition




Down Units

None reported


The subject property is currently occupied by multi-family residential buildings. No potential environmental concerns were identified during the onsite reconnaissance. Non-ASTM issues are discussed in Section 6.3.

6.1 General Site Characteristics

6.1.1 Solid Waste Disposal

Solid waste generated at the subject property is disposed of in commercial solid waste dumpsters located throughout the subject property. An independent solid waste disposal contractor removes solid waste from the subject property. According to Property personnel, only household trash is collected in the on-site solid waste dumpsters.

6.1.2 Sewage Discharge and Disposal

Sanitary discharges are discharged from the subject property into the municipal sanitary sewer system. The Columbia Water System services the subject area. No wastewater treatment facilities or septic systems are located on the subject property.

6.1.3 Surface Water Drainage

Storm water is removed from the subject property primarily by sheet flow action across the paved surfaces towards storm water drains located throughout the subject property and in the public right of way. Site storm water from the roofs of the subject buildings, landscaped areas, and paved areas is directed to on-site concrete swales, which drain to the public right of way, and to on-site storm water drains. The subject property is connected to a municipal owned and maintained sewer system.

The subject property does not appear to be a designated wetland area, based on information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture; however, a comprehensive wetlands survey would be required in order to formally determine actual wetlands on the subject property. Partner did not observe any surface impoundments, wetlands, natural catch basins, settling ponds, or lagoons on the subject property. Partner did not observe any drywells on the subject property.

6.1.4 Source of Heating and Cooling

Heating and cooling systems as well as domestic hot water equipment are fueled by electricity and natural gas provided by Columbia Power System. The mechanical system within the apartment units is comprised of a split system with a central unit and interior air-handler located within each apartment unit and an exterior condenser located outside of each apartment. Hot water is provided by central natural gas boiler units.

6.1.5 Wells and Cisterns

No aboveground evidence of wells or cisterns was observed during the site reconnaissance.


6.1.6 Wastewater

Domestic wastewater generated at the subject property is disposed by means of the municipal sanitary sewer system. No industrial process is currently performed at the subject property.

6.1.7 Septic Systems

No septic systems were observed or reported on the subject property.

6.1.8 Additional Site Observations

No additional relevant general site characteristics were observed on the subject property at the time of the assessment.

6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards

6.2.1 Hazardous Materials and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site

No hazardous materials or petroleum products were observed on the subject property. No evidence of the use of reportable quantities of hazardous materials or wastes was observed on the subject property. Small quantities of general maintenance supplies and pool maintenance supplies were found to be properly labeled and stored at the time of the assessment with no signs of leaks, stains, or spills. The storage and use of maintenance supplies does not appear to pose a significant threat to the environmental integrity of the subject property at this time.

6.2.2 Aboveground & Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs)

No evidence of ASTs or USTs was observed on the subject property at the time of the assessment.

6.2.3 Evidence of Releases

No spills, stains, or other indications that a surficial release has occurred at the subject property were observed or reported at the time of the assessment.

6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

Older transformers and other electrical equipment could contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at a level that subjects them to regulation by the U.S. EPA. PCBs in electrical equipment are controlled by United States Environmental Protection Agency regulations 40 CFR, Part 761. Under the regulations, there are three categories into which electrical equipment can be classified:

Less than 50 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs – “Non-PCB”

50 ppm-500 ppm – “PCB-Contaminated”


Greater than 500 ppm – “PCB-Containing”

The manufacture, process, or distribution in commerce or use of any PCB in any manner other than in a totally enclosed manner was prohibited after January 1, 1977.

The on-site reconnaissance addressed indoor and outdoor transformers that may contain PCBs. Partner observed pad-mounted electrical distribution transformers located throughout the subject property.

The units were not labeled as to their PCB status or ownership. No indication of staining, leaks, or fire damage was observed on or around the base of these units. Partner contacted a customer service representative of Columbia Power System (telephone conversation of December 8, 2008), who confirmed that Columbia Power System maintains ownership and operational responsibility for the transformers and that the units do not contain PCBs.

No elevators, capacitors, or other suspect equipment were observed on the subject property. Partner observed fluorescent light fixtures located throughout the subject buildings. Fluorescent fixtures, if manufactured prior to 1978, may contain PCBs; however, based on the construction date of the subject buildings, it is unlikely that the fixtures contain this material.

No other potential PCB-containing equipment (interior transformers, oil-filled switches, hoists, lifts, dock levelers, hydraulic elevators, etc.) was observed on the subject property during field reconnaissance activities.

6.2.5 Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors

No strong, pungent, or noxious odors were evident during the site reconnaissance.

6.2.6 Pools of Liquid

No pools of liquid were observed on the subject property at the time of the assessment.

6.2.7 Drains, Sumps and Clarifiers

No drains, sumps, or clarifiers, other than those associated with storm water removal, were observed on the subject property at the time of the assessment.

6.2.8 Pits, Ponds and Lagoons

No pits, ponds, or lagoons were observed on the subject property at the time of the assessment.

6.2.9 Stressed Vegetation

No stressed vegetation was observed on the subject property at the time of the assessment.


6.2.10 Landfills

No evidence of on-site landfill activities was observed or reported at the time of the assessment.

6.2.11 Radiological Hazards

No radiological substances or equipment was observed or reported stored on the subject property at the time of the assessment.

6.2.12 Additional Potential Environmental Hazards

No additional potential environmental hazards were observed.

6.3 Non-ASTM Services

6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs)

Asbestos is the name given to a number of naturally occurring, fibrous silicate minerals mined for their useful properties such as thermal insulation, chemical and thermal stability, and high tensile strength. Asbestos is commonly used as an acoustic insulator, thermal insulation, fire proofing and in other building materials. Exposure to airborne friable asbestos may result in a potential health risk because persons breathing the air may breathe in asbestos fibers. Continued exposure can increase the amount of fibers that remain in the lung. Fibers embedded in lung tissue over time may cause serious lung diseases including: asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma.

The subject buildings were constructed in 1997. As such, an asbestos evaluation was not required by the scope of services; however, please refer to the table below for observed materials that would be considered suspect ACMs in the event of a thorough survey.

6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint

Lead is a highly toxic metal that affects virtually every system of the body. While adults can suffer from excessive lead exposures, the groups most at risk are fetuses, infants and children under 6. Congress passed the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, also known as Title X, to protect families from exposure to lead from paint, dust, and soil. Section 1018 of this law directed the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and EPA to require the disclosure of known information on lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards before the sale or lease of most housing built before 1978. Sellers, landlords, and their agents are responsible for providing this information to the buyer or renter before sale or lease.

According to Section 1017 of Title X, “lead-based paint hazard is any condition that causes exposure to lead from lead-contaminated dust; bare, lead-contaminated soil; or lead-based paint that is deteriorated or intact lead-based paint present on accessible surfaces, friction surfaces, or impact surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects.” Therefore, under Title X intact lead-based paint on most walls and ceilings is not considered a “hazard,” although the


condition of the paint should be monitored and maintained to ensure that it does not become deteriorated. Lead-based paint is defined as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1 mg/cm2 (or 5,000 ug/g by weight) or more of lead.

Based on the construction date of the subject buildings (1997), it is unlikely that lead-based paint is present at the subject property. Furthermore, Partner observed painted surfaces throughout the subject property to be in good condition at the time of the assessment with no signs of peeling, flaking, or chipping.

6.3.3 Radon

Radon is a colorless, odorless, naturally occurring, radioactive, inert, gaseous element formed by radioactive decay of radium (Ra) atoms. The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones, Zone 1 being those areas with the average predicted indoor radon concentration in residential dwellings exceeding the EPA Action limit of 4.0 picoCuries per Liter (pCi/L). It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the EPA recommends site specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures.

Review of the EPA Map of Radon Zones places the subject property in Zone 1, where average predicted radon levels are greater than 4.0 pCi/L.

In accordance with Fannie Mae guidelines, Partner facilitated sampling at the subject property in order to ascertain general levels of radon concentrations at the subject property. Sampling activities were commenced by Don W. Davidson on December 4, 2008 and completed by on-site personnel on December 6, 2008. A total of ten (10) charcoal canisters were placed throughout the subject buildings and subsequently retrieved and forwarded to AccuStar Laboratories for radon analysis.

RADON SAMPLING RESULTS

Sample No. Location pCi/L Remarks

382548 Living Room, Unit 301 1.3 Below EPA Action Level


382561 Living Room, Unit 605 7.1 Above EPA Action Level




382490 Living Room, Unit 1201 -- Canister not returned



RADON SAMPLING RESULTS

Sample No. Location pCi/L Remarks

382512 Living Room, Unit 1305 -- Canister not returned


Five samples revealed analytical results at levels exceeding 4.0pCi/L. Based on the presence of radon within multiple samples at levels exceeding the EPA Action Level and the location of the Property within EPA Radon Zone 1, long term testing for Radon for a period of six months is recommended.

6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water

According to available information, a public water system operated by the Columbia Water System serves the subject vicinity. According to a representative of the Columbia Water System, shallow groundwater directly beneath the subject property is not utilized for domestic purposes. The sources of public water for the Columbia Water System are surface water from the Duck River. According to the City of Columbia and the 2007 Annual Water Quality Report, water supplied to the subject property is in compliance with all state and federal regulations pertaining to drinking water standards, including lead and copper.

6.3.5 Mold

Molds are microscopic organisms found virtually everywhere, indoors and outdoors. Mold will grow and multiply under the right conditions, needing only sufficient moisture (e.g., in the form of very high humidity, condensation, or water from a leaking pipe, etc.) and organic material (e.g., ceiling tile, drywall, paper, or natural fiber carpet padding). Mold growths often appear as discoloration, staining, or fuzzy growth on building materials or furnishings and are varied colors of white, gray, brow, black, yellow, and green. In large quantities, molds can cause allergic symptoms when inhaled or through the toxins the molds emit.

Partner observed accessible, interior areas for the subject buildings for significant evidence of mold growth; however, this ESA should not be used as a mold survey or inspection. Additionally, this inspection was not designed to assess all areas of potential mold growth that may be affected by mold growth on the subject site. Rather, it is intended to give the client an indication as to whether or not conspicuous (based on observed areas) mold growth is present at the subject property. This evaluation did not include a review of pipe chases, mechanical systems, or areas behind enclosed walls and ceilings.

During the unit observations, numerous units were observed with areas of mold accumulation around interior edges of the window units. The mold accumulation appeared to be caused by water condensation along the window edge and casing surfaces. According to the property manager, tenants are responsible for periodic cleaning or window surfaces and adjacent areas. This is reportedly a common occurrence and tenants are notified in writing about necessary cleaning practices to prevent mold accumulation.


6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance

The adjacent property reconnaissance consisted of observation of the adjacent properties from the subject property premises. No items of environmental concern were identified on any of the adjacent properties during the site inspection, including hazardous materials, petroleum products, ASTs, USTs, evidence of releases, PCBs, strong or noxious odors, pools of liquids, sumps or clarifiers, pits or lagoons, stressed vegetation, or any other potential environmental hazards. The properties located adjacent to the north, south, and west are occupied by undeveloped wooded lands or residential properties.


7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Findings

A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance or petroleum product on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term REC includes hazardous substances and petroleum products even under conditions that might be in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include "de minimis" conditions that do not present a threat to human health and/or the environment and that would not be subject to an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. The following was identified during the course of this investigation.

Partner did not identify any recognized environmental conditions during the course of this investigation.

A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to an environmental condition which would have been considered a REC in the past, but which may or may not be considered a REC currently. The following was identified during the course of this investigation.

Partner did not identify any historical recognized environmental conditions during the course of this investigation.

An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner that do not qualify as RECs, but warrant discussion.

Five Radon samples revealed analytical results at levels exceeding the EPA Action Level of 4.0pCi/L.

Conclusions, Opinions, and Recommendations

Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-05 of the Hampton Ridge Apartments property located at 300 McMeen Circle, in the City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 1.4 of this report.

Based on the presence of radon within multiple samples at levels exceeding the EPA Action Level and the location of the Property within EPA Radon Zone 1, long term testing for Radon for a period of six months is recommended.


8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on the Hampton Ridge Apartments property located at 300 McMeen Circle, in the City of Columbia, County of Maury, Tennessee in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report.

By signing below, Partner declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, the undersigned meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property.

Prepared By:

Don W. Davidson Environmental Professional

Reviewed By:

Frank S. Romeo, Jr. National Client Manager Senior Author

M. Evans Howell, MS, REA Principal

edr inc. count: 1 records. orphan summary city edr id site ... · columbia s118719833 best cleaners...

Documents