editorial super injunctions british journalism review
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Editorial Super Injunctions British Journalism Review
1/2
-
8/3/2019 Editorial Super Injunctions British Journalism Review
2/2
responsibilities for the country. If these allegations are proven... it does call
into question his role as England captain. I speak to the FA on a regular basis
so I will be asking what their viewpoint is and we will see what comes of it in
the future.
On the other hand, Alastair Campbell, in the Turf Moor Diaries blogthat celebrates his support of Burnley, wrote: He may be a multi-millionaire
superceleb with a potentially legend-making World Cup ahead of him, but
yesterday he was just one more man worrying what his missus was going to
do to him when he got home from work.
So this could be just one more example of the public being interested in
events that are not necessarily in the public interest, a scenario used by
Andrew Marr, when reiterating, in this issue of the BJR, his support for a
privacy law. Clearly the Terry case is not an important matter of publicconcern, as was the oil trading company Trafiguras use of a super-injunction
to prevent The Guardian reporting a parliamentary question about the
alleged dumping of toxic waste. But such have been the highly-derided
judgments delivered by Mr Justice Eady after employment of this
indiscriminate legal firewall that it comes as no surprise when celebrities
behaving badly are advised to reach for it as soon as an inquisitive newspaper
starts probing.
The most obnoxious aspect of the super-injunctions is that their essenceis secrecy there is a reek of Star Chamber about the whole process. One
particularly welcome aspect of Mr Justice Tugendhats judgment was his
criticism of Terrys lawyers, Schillings, for failing to inform the News of the
World, which was getting ready to publish the Terry story, about the legal
steps they were taking on the footballers behalf. The judges ruling
demonstrates that there are severe limitations to the scope of super-
injunctions. Now the Justice Ministry, involved in consultations with the
judiciary and the media, has to find a way to bring them under control for thesake of open justice. BH
BritishJourn
alismR
eviewvol.21no.1
march2010
4