edison electric institute conference november 6-9, 2005

56
Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

Upload: shanon-wade

Post on 13-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

Edison Electric Institute ConferenceNovember 6-9, 2005

Page 2: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

2

Cautionary Statements And Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results

Any statements made herein about future operating results or other future events are forward-looking statements under the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. A discussion of factors that could cause actual results or events to vary is contained in the Appendix herein and in our SEC filings.

Page 3: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

3

FPL Group

FPL FPL Energy

• $16.6 billion market capitalization

• $33.6 billion in total assets

• 32,843 mw in operation

• $10.5 billion operating revenue

• One of the largest U.S. electric utilities• Vertically integrated, retail rate- regulated utility• 20,843 mw in operation• 4.3 million customers• $8.7 billion operating revenue

• Successful wholesale generator, operating in 24 states

• U.S. market leader in wind-generation

• 12,000 mw in operation• $1.7 billion operating revenue

A Growing, Diversified Company

Revenue data as of 12/31/04, market capitalization data as of 11/1/05; all other data as of 9/3005

Page 4: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-0590

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

Inde

xed

Ret

urn

(%)FPL Group

Comparative Total Shareholder Return*YTD thru Nov 1

FPL Group S&P 500 Electric Utilities Index S&P 500 Index

15.9{%}

15.1{%}

0.7{%}

* Dividends are reinvested 4

Page 5: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

5

Total Shareholder Return

29%

11%

49%

44%

-11%

113%

Five-year return 12/31/99 – 12/31/04

Three-year return 12/31/01 – 12/31/04

Ten-year return 12/31/94 – 12/31/04

216%212%

184%

FPLGroup

S&P 500

Dow Jones Utilities

FPLGroup

S&P 500

Dow Jones Utilities

FPLGroup

S&P 500

Dow Jones Utilities

Page 6: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005
Page 7: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

7

Florida Power & Light (FPL)Premier Electric Utility

• Favorable customer mix • Strong customer and usage

growth • Operational excellence • Proven cost management • Constructive regulatory

environment

Page 8: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

8

FPL: Demonstrated Ability to Grow Earnings

Steady customer growth translates to steady earnings growth

Delivered Sales & Adj. Earnings

400

500

600

700

800

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04

Ad

juste

d E

arn

ing

s (

$ m

illi

on

s)

0

25

50

75

100

FP

L D

eli

vere

d S

ale

s (

bil

lio

n k

wh

)

Adjusted Earnings2CAGR 3.5%

FPL Delivered Sales1 CAGR 3.1%

1 Delivered sales adjusted for the impact of the 2004 hurricane season2 See Appendix for reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted amounts3 CAGR calculated from 1994 to 2003; 2004 results not available

U.S. Delivered Sales CAGR 2.0%3

Page 9: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

9

Volume Growth(10-year CAGR of 3.1%)

Customer Growth(10-year CAGR of 2.1%)

Usage Growth(10-year CAGR of 1.0%)

Mix Effects (10-year CAGR of 0.0%)

Top-line growth at FPL

• Economic growth• Larger houses• Appliances and

electronics• Price elasticity• Short-term effects• Weather variability

• Small over the long-term

• Short-term effects

• Continued population growth…

• …tempered by cyclical and short-term factors

Note: 10-year CAGR figures as of December 31, 2004

Page 10: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

10

Robust job growth in Florida

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

US Florida

1999 - 2004

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

Jan

Feb Mar Apr

May

June

July

AugSep

t

US Florida

Source: U.S. Department of Labor

Through September 2005, Florida had created 11% of the nation’s jobs

2005 (1st nine months)

Page 11: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

11

Florida ranks 1st in growth among most populous states

1 Estimated population by state as a percentage of total U.S. population; figures for 2030 are based on estimated population

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

1.1%United States

6.5%0.3%New York

4.3%0.6%Illinois

12.2%1.5%California

7.7%1.9%Texas

5.9%2.1%Florida

2000-2004 in 20041 CAGR % of Population

State

0.9%

0.1%

0.3%

1.1%

1.6%

2.0%

2000-2030CAGR

5.4%

3.7%

12.8%

9.2%

7.9%

in 20301

% of Population

Page 12: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

12

Maintaining Operational Excellence

1 2004 lower then historical average due to refueling outages2 FPL data as of 2004 excluding the impact of the three hurricanes that hit FPL’s service territory; industry average data as of

2003

1.81 1.77

1.24

1.67

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

99 00 01 02 03 04

FPL Industry Average

O&M Reductions(cents per Retail kwh)

Industry

FPL

137

69

FPL Industry Average

Service Reliability Outage Time per Customer 2

(minutes)

Plant AvailabilityEquivalent Availability Factor

Nuclear 1

Down 26%since 1994

Superior Cost Management

(O&M $ per customer) $539$504

$291

$359

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04

Industry Average

FPL

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

99 00 01 02 03 04

FPL Industry Average

Fossil

FPL Group achieves operational excellence by continuously improving the performance of its power plants

Page 13: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

13

Delivering Value to Customers

$88$92

$98 $98

Gulf Power FPL PEF TECO

137

69

FPL Industry Average

1999$75.54

fuel charge $19.80

base rate $47.46

other $8.28

Comparatively low residential rates and outstanding service reliability have been rewarded with high customer approval

Residential Bill per 1,000 kwh1

Outage Time per Customer3 (minutes)

2005 Residential Survey Scores4

Good

2006$106.36 other

$12.02fuel

charge $56.22

base rate $38.12

While Base Rates have Declined, Fuel Charges have more than Doubled2

(1,000 kwh)

99

102

FPL Industry Average

1 Source: Company filings, bills exclude municipal taxes and franchise fees. 2 Excluding franchise fees and municipal taxes; rates as of March 1999 and September 2005, with fuel effective 1/1/06 as proposed3 FPL data as of 2004 excluding the impact of the three hurricanes that hit FPL’s service territory; industry average data as of 20034 Source: J.D. Power and Associates, July 21, 2005

Sept. 2005 Jan. 2006

$92

$106 $108 $108

Gulf Power FPL PEF* TECO

* Figure does not include an anticipated fuel re-filing

Page 14: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

14

Diversified Fuel Sources

Further hedged through its use of multiple energysources at FPL

FPL Projected 2014 Fuel Sources(mWh produced)

FPL 2004 Fuel Sources(mWh produced)

Nuclear16%

Coal14%

Gas50%

Purchased Power

9%

Oil11%

Gas37%

Nuclear21%

Purchased Power18%

Oil18%

Coal6%

Source: FPL Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan, 2005 - 2014

Page 15: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

15

26,283

18,146

94 96 98 00 02 04 06E 08E 10E

Managing Extraordinary Growth at FPL

4.69

4.22

3.42

Steady customer growth requires significant system expansion

Average Customer Accounts (mm)

Total Generation Capability(mw)

West County or

PPAsTurkey Point 5

West County or

PPAs

Source: FPL Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan, 2005 - 2014

Page 16: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

16

FPL: Investing Capital to Support Growing Energy Demand

Steady customer growth translates into increased investment

Capital Expenditures(billions)

$-

$0.5

$1.0

$1.5

$2.0

$2.5

01 02 03 04 05E 06E 07E 08E

All other Transmission and Distribution New Generation

2005-2008 cumulativeCapEx of $6.7 bn

Page 17: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

17

ROE Trends - Regulatory and Financial

Regulatory

Financial

9.5%

10.0%

10.5%

11.0%

11.5%

12.0%

12.5%

13.0%

13.5%

14.0%

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04

Florida Power & LightReturn on Equity

Downside Protection of 10.0% Continued

1 Financial ROE is calculated by using a rolling 12-month GAAP net income before cumulative effect adjustments and any extraordinary items divided by simple average of beginning and ending equity.

1

Page 18: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

18

Regulatory proceedings – a recap• Storm cost recovery

– 2004 storm recovery proceedings closed out– recovery of all storm fund deficits assured– recent general rate case modifies approach to recovery

• prudently incurred restoration costs fully recoverable; several alternatives available to recover such costs

• General rate case resolved– four-year stipulation and settlement unanimously approved by Florida regulators in August– revenue adjustments in place to recover pre-approved generation build

• 2006 fuel clause filings– 2005 underrecovery projected to be $973 million1; seeking to recover over two-year period– 2006 projected fuel increase to be $1.8 billion– fuel clause in place; consistent track record of recovery in Florida – regulatory decision expected on November 9, 2005

1 Figure includes 2004 underrecovery of $7.7 million

Page 19: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

19

FPL Rate Stipulation and Settlement: Key elements continued from prior agreement

• Revenue sharing– Thresholds and caps escalate per pre-defined formula

• No authorized ROE– 11.75% used for clause and other purposes

• Downside protection at 10% ROE• Continue $125 million depreciation credit

Page 20: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

20

FPL Rate Stipulation and Settlement: New elements

• Generation Base Rate Adjustment (GBRA)– For new generation approved by PSC under Power Plant Siting Act (PPSA)– Revenue requirement set by PPSA application

• Modified approach to storm cost recovery– Prudently incurred restoration costs fully recoverable– No annual accruals to storm reserve– Additions to reserve and recoveries of shortfalls via securitization or base rate surcharge

• Suspension of annual nuclear decommissioning accrual for a minimum of four years

• Clause recovery for any RTO expenses• New rate structures

Page 21: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005
Page 22: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

22

A Leading Wholesale Company

• Well diversified by fuel source and by region• Wind and nuclear continue to build substantial value

– PTC extension supports continued and consistent wind development – acquisition of 70% interest in Duane Arnold targeted for early 2006 close– Seabrook up-rate

• Commodity market continues to improve– expiring contracts renewing at higher margins

• Disciplined approach to potential new portfolio additions (nuclear, fossil, QF interests)

• Strength of operations - on path to acceptable ROEs by 2007 (includes CCGTs)

Page 23: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

23

Wind26%

Merchant(fossil and

hydro)46%

Seabrook (nuclear)

9%

Contracted Fossil19%

FPL Energy’s diverse portfolio

12,000 Net mw in Operation

As of 9/30/05

FPL Energy operations

West17%

Central36% Northeast

24%

Mid-Atlantic

23%

Asset Type Regional Breakdown

Page 24: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

24

Significantly Improved Market ConditionsMarket Update

Change in Change in Cal 06Cal 06 Forward Cal 06 Forward

9/30/05 1/3/05 – 6/30/05 6/30/05 – 9/30/05

Natural Gas ($/MMBTU) 1 11.71$ 1.91$ 3.72$

NEPOOL 7x24 Power 2 106.96$ 14.52$ 35.72$

NEPOOL Spark Spreads 3 30.90$ 2.28$ 11.49$

ERCOT Spark Spreads 4 25.98$ 7.26$ 6.41$

WECC Spark Spreads 5 25.57$ 2.87$ 0.81$

Forward

1 NYMEX2 Mass Hub3 Mass Hub, Tetco M3 and 7,000 heat rate4 ERCOT N, Houston Ship Channel and 7,000 heat rate5 SP15, NGI SoCal and 7,000 heat rate

Page 25: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

25

1 Weighted to reflect in-service dates, planned maintenance, Seabrook’s refueling and power uprate in 2006, Duane Arnold’s refueling outage in 2007 and expected production from renewable resource assets. Includes the pending acquisition of a 70% interest in the Duane Arnold Energy Center. 2 Reflects round-the-clock mw under contract.3 Includes all projects with mid- to long-term purchase power contracts for substantially all of their output.4 Includes only those facilities that require active hedging. 5 Reflects on-peak mw under contract.6 Totals may not add due to rounding. All data as of 9/30/05

2006 2007

Asset Class Available

MW 1

% MW under

Contract

Available

MW 1

% MW under

Contract

Wind 3,098 98% 3,097 98% Contracted 3 2,465 99% 2,465 99% Merchant 4

NEPOOL 2,281 68% 2,454 38% ERCOT 2,559 88% 2,619 22% All other 1,417 30% 1,372 18%

Total portfolio 6 11,819 82% 12,006 60%

FPL Energy Contract Coverage

2

2

2

2

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Page 26: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

26

U.S. leader in wind energy

18%

22%

33%

37%

43%41%

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

99 00 01 02 03 04

mw

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

FP

L E

ner

gy

Mar

ket

Sh

are

Industry FPL Energy Market Share

Wind Generation Market Share

FPL Energy Wind Generation

3,2792,7582,720

1,7451,421

578460

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

99 00 01 02 03 04 05E

mw

1 As of 9/30/05, projected additions of 521 mw include 381 mw already placed into service with the remainder to be operational by late 2005 or early 2006. An additional 38 mw was placed into service as of 10/31/05.

1

Page 27: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

27

Leading the U.S. in Wind Energy

• Public policy support required – Production Tax Credits (PTCs) extended through 2007

18%

22%

33%

37%

43%41%

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

99 00 01 02 03 04m

w0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

FP

L E

ner

gy

Mar

ket

Sh

are

FPL Energy Industry FPL Energy Market Share

Our Competitive Advantages:

• Business scale• Project development track record• Quick-to-market (3 - 6 months)• Tax appetite• Creditworthy• Efficient third party financing

access

Wind Generation Market Share

Page 28: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

28

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

05 06 07

Wind is a Significant Source of Income Growth

Wind Generation Additions (mw)

Projected Wind Generation Additions

(mw)

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Pre-00

00 01 02 03 04 05

625-750

Each 100 mw adds roughly ½ - 1 cent/share first twelve months

Expect the addition of 625 to 750 mw per year in 2006 and 2007

1

1 Actual through 9/30/05

2 Including in-service projects and those currently under development with anticipated in-service dates of late 2005 or early 2006.

2

625-750

521

Page 29: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

29

Top 10 U.S. Wind Developer/Owner

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

FP

L E

ner

gy

PP

M E

ner

gy

Sh

ell W

ind

En

erg

y

Mid

Am

eric

an

Ho

rizo

n W

ind

(Go

ldm

anS

ach

s)

Inve

ner

gy

Bab

cock

&B

row

n

En

Xco

Eu

rus

AE

S/S

eaW

est

MW

3,279

773

355 350 298 264 262 257 196 187

1Projected MW at YE 2005 as of 9/30/05; 2005 additions include Callahan, Horse Hollow, Weatherford, and Wilton.

1

Page 30: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

30

“Wind 101” Economics

• Production Tax Credit available for every kWh produced;– 1.9¢ in 2005, escalating with inflation, for first 10 years of operation– credit available for new projects that achieve COD by 12/31/07

• MACRS depreciation over 5 years• PPA market in U.S. typically 15-25 years, 3-6 ¢/kWh• All-in construction costs in 2006/2007 will likely range

from $1,300 - $1,700/kw, depending upon size of project, region, interconnection requirements

• Typical wind project size: 50-150 MW• Typical capacity factor: 25-40%

Page 31: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

31

FPL Energy Acquired the Seabrook Nuclear Station in 2002

92.9%

85.3%

Average 1995 - 2002 Average post FPLEnergy

788

915

2002 2005

Reliability (capacity factor)Headcount1

• Financial performance well above original forecast

• Substantial upside performance– 80+ net mw uprate

– Recontracting at higher prices

Additional expected contribution margin $80 - $100 million in 2007

Market Price for Electricity (MA Hub)

$-

$20

$40$60

$80

$100

$120$140

$160

$180

11/1/02 11/1/04 11/1/06 11/1/08 11/1/10

$/m

wh

1 As of year-end

Page 32: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

32

$175$175$126$105$83

$58$32$9

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05E 06E 07E

Strong Track Record of Growth at FPL Energy

Adjusted Earnings1

($ millions)

49% Compound Annual Growth Rate

1 See Appendix for reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted amounts2 2005 estimate is based upon FPL Energy EPS expectations provided on slide 36, and assumes normal weather and

excludes the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting standards as well as the mark-to-market effect of non-qualifying hedges, neither of which can be determined at this time.

3 FPL Energy’s 2006 and 2007 figures are based upon FPL Energy EPS expectations provided on slide 36 and are believed to be appropriate for this point in time. As a result, they should only be read in conjunction with the Company’s standard earnings expectations, which is usually delivered upon the release of quarterly earnings or in another Reg FD forum.

$250 - 2802

$350 - 3903

$450 - 5253

Page 33: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

33

Disciplined Acquisition Strategy

• Strategic • Fits the portfolio

• Largely hedged / “Deep in the money” • Financeable

• Operational upside • Attractive economics

• Immediately accretive to earnings

ContractedFossil

PartnersNuclear Wind

FPL EnergyFocus

Acquisition Criteria

Page 34: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005
Page 35: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

35

FPL Group Outlook1

• Annual sustainable EPS growth of 9-10% through end of decade– composition of growth is transparent– assumes no incremental asset acquisitions beyond those already announced

• Corporate Outlook1, 2

– 2005: $2.50 – $2.60 per share prior to Wilma impact – 2006: $2.80 – $2.90 per share – 2007: $3.15 – $3.35 per share

1 Assumes normal weather and excludes the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting standards as well as the mark-to-market effect of non-qualifying hedges neither of which can be determined at this time

2 Excludes any impact from Hurricane Wilma, which can not be estimated at this time

Page 36: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

36

Adjusted Earnings per Share expectations

20041 2005E2 2006E2 2007E2

FPL $2.07 $1.98 - 2.05 $2.05 - 2.10 $2.15 - 2.25

FPL Energy 0.49 0.65 - 0.73 0.90 - 1.00 1.15 - 1.35

Other (0.10) (0.15) - (0.18) (0.15) - (0.20) (0.15) - (0.20)

Consolidated $2.46 $2.50 - 2.60 $2.80 - 2.90 $3.15 - 3.35

Note: the 2005, 2006 and 2007 adjusted earnings expectations are valid as of November 4, 2005 and should be viewed in conjunction with the “Assumptions” page (slide 37) and with the Company’s Cautionary Statements contained in the Appendix to this presentation.

1 See Appendix for reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted amounts2 Assumes normal weather and excludes the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting standards as well as

the mark-to-market effect of non-qualifying hedges neither of which can be determined at this time

--- EXCLUDES IMPACT OF HURRICANE WILMA ---

Page 37: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

37

FPL Group: Key Assumptions1

• 2% customer growth• No usage per customer growth in 2006; 1% in 2007• Continued cost control• Turkey Point expansion remains on schedule (mid-2007)• Normal weather

• Wind development: 625 - 750 mw each year, 2006 and 2007 • Market forwards as of early September (excludes recent forward market

peaks)• Timely close of Duane Arnold acquisition• Operational performance consistent with historical levels

• Yield curves as of late September • Balanced financing plan maintains current credit position• Incremental non-recourse debt where net credit impact is

favorable

FPL:

FPL Energy:

Corporate and Other:

1 Excludes impact of Hurricane Wilma

Page 38: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

38

Expected 2005 EPS Range $0.65 – $0.73

New investments 0.24 – 0.28

Existing portfolio 0.08 – 0.12

Asset restructuring, marketing and trading (0.02) – 0.02

Interest (0.07) – (0.05)

All other, including share dilution (0.04) – (0.02)

Expected 2006 EPS Range $0.90 – $1.00

1 Assumes normal weather and excludes the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting standards as well as the mark-to-market effect of non-qualifying hedges neither of which can be determined at this time

Drivers of FPL Energy Earnings Growth: 2005-20061

Page 39: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

39

Expected 2006 EPS Range $0.90 – $1.00

New investments 0.12 – 0.24

Existing portfolio 0.10 – 0.20

Asset restructuring, marketing and trading (0.01) – 0.01

Interest (0.05) – (0.03)

All other, including share dilution (0.02) – 0.02

Expected 2007 EPS Range $1.15 – $1.35

Drivers of FPL Energy Earnings Growth: 2006-20071

1 Assumes normal weather and excludes the cumulative effect of adopting new accounting standards as well as the mark-to-market effect of non-qualifying hedges neither of which can be determined at this time

Page 40: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

40

FPL: Potential Drivers of 2006 Earnings Variability

Issue Variability

Potential Impact 2006 Weather variability at 80% probability ± 7¢

Revenue growth ± 1% ± 2 - 3¢

O&M expenses sensitivity ± 2% ± 4¢

Interest rates ± 1% ± 2¢

See Company’s Cautionary Statements contained in the Appendix and the Company’s filings for full discussion of risks

Page 41: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

41

Issue Sensitivity Variability Potential

Impact 2006 Weather Wind portfolio wind resource ± 1 wind index ± 3¢

Maine hydro rainfall, snow pack

± 20% 1 ± 4¢

Market risk

commodity prices

± $2/mmbtu ± 6 - 7¢

Oper. performance EFOR ± 1% ± 1 - 3¢ New growth Wind New development 625 – 750 MW ± 2¢

Asset restructuring

0 – 2% of FPLE earnings

1 From historic mean

FPL Energy: Potential Drivers of 2006 Earnings Variability

Page 42: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005
Page 43: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

43

Sound credit profile reflected on balance sheet and credit ratings

Total Debt toTotal Capitalization 1 S&P Moody’s Fitch

FPL Group, Inc. Issuer

A/Negative

A2/Stable

A/Stable

FPL First Mortgage Bonds

A/Negative

Aa3/Stable

AA-/Stable

FPL Group Capital Senior Unsecured

A-/ Negative

A2/ Stable

A/Stable

1 All data as of 12/31/04

61%

FPL Group IndustryAverage

56% (GAAP)

44% (Adjusted)

Page 44: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

44

Financial Strength

S&P Issuer Credit Rating

Early 2002 Rating

Current Rating

Early 2002 Rating

Current Rating

A+

A

BBB+

BBB

A-

BBB-

Best Rating in the Industry

Ratings as of 11/1/05

FPL Duke Southern Exelon Entergy Dominion AEP Progress

Page 45: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

45

Credit Facilities($ millions)

    Current    

5-Year 3-Year Total

Florida Power & Light $1,000 $500 $1,500L/C sublimit $750

FPL Group Capital $1,000 $1,000 $2,000L/C sublimit $750

Total $2,000 $1,500 $3,500

Page 46: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

46

Growing, stable dividend

Dividend Payout

56% 54%

FPL Group Industry Average

2/15: Raised quarterly

dividend by 4%

1 Annualized split-adjusted quarterly dividend2 Dividend payout is based on earnings of $2.55, the mid-point of 2005 EPS estimate

range of $2.50 to $2.60 given on slide 36. 3 Dividend payout is based on 2005 First Call EPS estimate

$1.04 $1.08 $1.12 $1.16 $1.20$1.30

$1.42

99 00 01 02 03 04 051

Increaseddividend by

13%

2 3

Page 47: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

47

The Building Blocks of Long-Term Growth

Base Growth atFlorida Power & Light

Base Growth atFPL Energy

+

+

Return to MerchantMarket Equilibrium

Continued Wind Development

+

Long-Term EarningsGrowth Potential

FPL Group =

New Capital Deployment

+

=

Page 48: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005
Page 49: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

Appendix

Page 50: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

50

FPL - Reconciliation GAAP to Adjusted Earnings and EPS

There were no adjustments to GAAP earnings from 1994 to 1998 and from 2002 to 2004

1999 2000 2001

Net Income 576$ 607$ 679$

Adjustments, net of income taxes:

Settlement of litigation 42

Merger-related expenses 38 16 Adjusted Earnings 618$ 645$ 695$

1999 2000 2001

Earnings Per Share (assuming dilution) 1.68$ 1.78$ 2.01$

Adjustments, net of income tax:

Settlement of litigation 0.12

Merger-related expenses 0.11 0.05 Adjusted Earnings Per Share 1.80$ 1.89$ 2.06$

($ millions, except per share amounts)

Page 51: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

51

FPL Group - Reconciliation GAAP to Adjusted EPS

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Earnings Per Share (assuming dilution) 2.03$ 2.07$ 2.31$ 1.37$ 2.50$ 2.45$

Adjustments, net of income taxes:Litigation settlement at FPL 0.12 Impairment loss at FPL Energy 0.30 Gains on divestiture of cable investment at Corporate & Other (0.47) Merger-related expenses - $0.11 per share at FPL and $0.01 per share

at Corporate & Other 0.12 Merger-related expenses - $0.05 per share at FPL and $0.01 per share at

Corporate & Other 0.06 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (FAS 142) - FPL Energy 0.64 Charges due to restructuring - $0.21 per share at FPL Energy and $0.18

per share at Corporate & Other 0.39

Reserve for leveraged leases - Corporate & Other 0.09 Gain on settlement of IRS litigation - Corporate & Other (0.09) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (FIN 46) - FPL Energy 0.01

Net unrealized mark-to-market losses (gains) associated

w ith non-qualifying hedges, FPL Energy (0.02) (0.06) 0.01 Adjusted Earnings Per Share 1.98$ 2.19$ 2.35$ 2.40$ 2.45$ 2.46$

Page 52: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

52

FPL Energy - Reconciliation GAAP to Adjusted Earnings

Totals may not add due to rounding

($ millions, except per share amounts) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Net income (Loss) (46)$ 82$ 113$ (169)$ 194$ 172$ Adjustments, net of income tax:Impairment loss 104 Merger-related expenses 1

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (FAS 142) 222 Restructuring and other charges 73

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (FIN 46) 3 Net unrealized mark-to-market losses (gains) associated

with non-qualifying hedges (8) (22) 3 Adjusted Earnings 58$ 83$ 105$ 126$ 175$ 175$

Earnings (Loss) Per Share (assuming dilution) (0.13)$ 0.24$ 0.33$ (0.49)$ 0.54$ 0.48$

Adjustments, net of income taxes:Impairment loss 0.30 Merger-related expenses

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (FAS 142) 0.64 Restructuring and other charges 0.21

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (FIN 46) 0.01 Net unrealized mark-to-market losses (gains) associated

with non-qualifying hedges (0.02) (0.06) 0.01 Adjusted Earnings Per Share 0.17$ 0.24$ 0.31$ 0.36$ 0.49$ 0.49$

There were no adjustments to GAAP earnings in 1997 and 1998

Page 53: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

53

In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act), FPL Group, Inc. (FPL Group) and Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) are hereby filing cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause FPL Group's or FPL's actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Reform Act) made by or on behalf of FPL Group and FPL in this presentation, on their respective websites, in response to questions or otherwise. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, believe, could, estimated, may, plan, potential, projection, target, outlook) are not statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties. Accordingly, any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the following important factors (in addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements) that could cause FPL Group's or FPL's actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of FPL Group and FPL.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and FPL Group and FPL undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances, including unanticipated events, after the date on which such statement is made. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

The following are some important factors that could have a significant impact on FPL Group's and FPL's operations and financial results, and could cause FPL Group's and FPL's actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:

• FPL Group and FPL are subject to changes in laws or regulations, including the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended (PURPA), the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended (Holding Company Act), the Federal Power Act, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and certain sections of the Florida statutes relating to public utilities, changing governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) and the utility commissions of other states in which FPL Group has operations, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), with respect to, among other things, allowed rates of return, industry and rate structure, operation of nuclear power facilities, operation and construction of plant facilities, operation and construction of transmission facilities, acquisition, disposal, depreciation and amortization of assets and facilities, recovery of fuel and purchased power costs, decommissioning costs, return on common equity (ROE) and equity ratio limits, and present or prospective wholesale and retail competition (including but not limited to retail wheeling and transmission costs). The FPSC has the authority to disallow recovery by FPL of any and all costs that it considers excessive or imprudently incurred.

• The regulatory process generally restricts FPL's ability to grow earnings and does not provide any assurance as to achievement of earnings levels.

• FPL Group and FPL are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations relating to air quality, water quality, waste management, wildlife mortality, natural resources and health and safety that could, among other things, restrict or limit the output of certain facilities or the use of certain fuels required for the production of electricity and/or require additional pollution control equipment and otherwise increase costs. There are significant capital, operating and other costs associated with compliance with these environmental statutes, rules and regulations, and those costs could be even more significant in the future.

Cautionary Statements And Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results

Page 54: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

54

• FPL Group and FPL operate in a changing market environment influenced by various legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding deregulation, regulation or restructuring of the energy industry, including deregulation of the production and sale of electricity. FPL Group and its subsidiaries will need to adapt to these changes and may face increasing competitive pressure.

• FPL Group's and FPL's results of operations could be affected by FPL's ability to renegotiate franchise agreements with municipalities and counties in Florida.

• The operation of power generation facilities involves many risks, including start up risks, breakdown or failure of equipment, transmission lines or pipelines, use of new technology, the dependence on a specific fuel source, including the supply and transportation of fuel, or the impact of unusual or adverse weather conditions (including natural disasters such as hurricanes), as well as the risk of performance below expected or contracted levels of output or efficiency. This could result in lost revenues and/or increased expenses. Insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not cover any or all of the lost revenues or increased expenses, including the cost of replacement power. In addition to these risks, FPL Group's and FPL's nuclear units face certain risks that are unique to the nuclear industry including the ability to store and/or dispose of spent nuclear fuel, as well as additional regulatory actions up to and including shutdown of the units stemming from public safety concerns, whether at FPL Group's and FPL's plants, or at the plants of other nuclear operators. Breakdown or failure of an FPL Energy, LLC (FPL Energy) operating facility may prevent the facility from performing under applicable power sales agreements which, in certain situations, could result in termination of the agreement or incurring a liability for liquidated damages.

• FPL Group's and FPL's ability to successfully and timely complete their power generation facilities currently under construction, those projects yet to begin construction or capital improvements to existing facilities within established budgets is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. Should any such efforts be unsuccessful, FPL Group and FPL could be subject to additional costs, termination payments under committed contracts, and/or the write-off of their investment in the project or improvement.

• FPL Group and FPL use derivative instruments, such as swaps, options, futures and forwards, to manage their commodity and financial market risks, and, to a lesser extent, engage in limited trading activities. FPL Group could recognize financial losses as a result of volatility in the market values of these contracts, or if a counterparty fails to perform. In the absence of actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these derivative instruments involves management's judgment or use of estimates. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts. In addition, FPL's use of such instruments could be subject to prudency challenges and if found imprudent, cost recovery could be disallowed by the FPSC.

• There are other risks associated with FPL Energy. In addition to risks discussed elsewhere, risk factors specifically affecting FPL Energy's success in competitive wholesale markets include the ability to efficiently develop and operate generating assets, the successful and timely completion of project restructuring activities, maintenance of the qualifying facility status of certain projects, the price and supply of fuel (including transportation), transmission constraints, competition from new sources of generation, excess generation capacity and demand for power. There can be significant volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity, and there are other financial, counterparty and market risks that are beyond the control of FPL Energy. FPL Energy's inability or failure to effectively hedge its assets or positions against changes in commodity prices, interest rates, counterparty credit risk or other risk measures could significantly impair FPL Group's future financial results. In keeping with industry trends, a portion of FPL Energy's power generation facilities operate wholly or partially without long-term power purchase agreements. As a result, power from these facilities is sold on the spot market or on a short-term contractual basis, which may affect the volatility of FPL Group's financial results. In addition, FPL Energy's business depends upon transmission facilities owned and operated by others; if transmission is disrupted or capacity is inadequate or unavailable, FPL Energy's ability to sell and deliver its wholesale power may be limited.

Page 55: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005

55

• FPL Group is likely to encounter significant competition for acquisition opportunities that may become available as a result of the consolidation of the power industry, in general, as well as the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. In addition, FPL Group may be unable to identify attractive acquisition opportunities at favorable prices and to successfully and timely complete and integrate them.

• FPL Group and FPL rely on access to capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows. The inability of FPL Group, FPL Group Capital Inc (FPL Group Capital) and FPL to maintain their current credit ratings could affect their ability to raise capital on favorable terms, particularly during times of uncertainty in the capital markets, which, in turn, could impact FPL Group's and FPL's ability to grow their businesses and would likely increase interest costs.

• FPL Group’s and FPL’s results of operations are affected by the growth in customer accounts in FPL’s service area. Customer growth can be affected by population growth as well as economic factors in Florida, including job and income growth, housing starts and new home prices. Customer growth directly influences the demand for electricity and the need for additional power generation and power delivery facilities at FPL.

• FPL Group's and FPL's results of operations are affected by changes in the weather. Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and natural gas and affect the price of energy commodities, and can affect the production of electricity at wind and hydro-powered facilities.

• FPL Group’s and FPL’s results of operations can be affected by the impact of severe weather which can be destructive, causing outages and property damage, may affect fuel supply and could require additional costs to be incurred. At FPL, recovery of these costs is subject to FPSC approval.

• FPL Group and FPL are subject to costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims, as well as the effect of new, or changes in, tax laws, rates or policies, rates of inflation, accounting standards, securities laws or corporate governance requirements.

• FPL Group and FPL are subject to direct and indirect effects of terrorist threats and activities. Generation and transmission facilities, in general, have been identified as potential targets. The effects of terrorist threats and activities include, among other things, terrorist actions or responses to such actions or threats, the inability to generate, purchase or transmit power, the risk of a significant slowdown in growth or a decline in the U.S. economy, delay in economic recovery in the United States, and the increased cost and adequacy of security and insurance.

• FPL Group's and FPL's ability to obtain insurance, and the cost of and coverage provided by such insurance, could be affected by national, state or local events as well as company-specific events.

• FPL Group and FPL are subject to employee workforce factors, including loss or retirement of key executives, availability of qualified personnel, collective bargaining agreements with union employees and work stoppage.

The issues and associated risks and uncertainties described above are not the only ones FPL Group and FPL may face. Additional issues may arise or become material as the energy industry evolves. The risks and uncertainties associated with these additional issues could impair FPL Group's and FPL's businesses and financial results in the future.

Page 56: Edison Electric Institute Conference November 6-9, 2005