ebs sah 2012
TRANSCRIPT
EBS presentation 1
Poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage:
to rush or not to rush?
Macquarie Neurosurgery
Evidence Based Surgery presentation
22 March 2012
D. Bervini
EBS presentation 2
EBS presentation 3
EBS presentation 4
EBS presentation 5
EBS presentation 6
• Dilemma: “can early surgery for poor grade patients be undertaken to reduce the risk of rebleeding without causing a significant deterioration in overall management outcome by inflicting excess morbidity and mortality?”
EBS presentation 7
Searchable question
• “Does early surgery for patients with poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoidal haemorrhage improve outcome (compared to delayed surgery)?”
• Databases
• Ovid Medline, usingMeSH
• Scopus using key articles and tracking citations
EBS presentation 8
Searchable question (PICO format)• Population: patients with poor grade
aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
• Intervention: early surgery
• Compared: delayed surgery (or conservative treatment)
• Outcome: outcome (morbidity and mortality)
EBS presentation 9
Search strategy
http://libguides.mq.edu.au/content.php?pid=167579&sid=1412020
EBS presentation 10
Search strategy
EBS presentation 11
EBS presentation 12
EBS presentation 13
EBS presentation 14
EBS presentation 15
EBS presentation 16
EBS presentation 17
EBS presentation 18
EBS presentation 19
EBS presentation 20
EBS presentation 21
EBS presentation 22
EBS presentation 23
EBS presentation 24
SCOPUS
EBS presentation 25
EBS presentation 26
EBS presentation 27
EBS presentation 28
Author Article Journal No Mortality Favorable outcome
Jian-Wei Pan 2009Ultra-Early Surgery for Poor-Grade Intracranial Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Yonsei Med J 9 22% 44%
Zentner J 1996Results of early surgery in poor-grade aneurysm patients
Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 85 29%
52% (HH IV) 22% (HH V)
Steudel, W.-I 1994Modulated surgery in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm in poor grade patients Neurological Research 116 23% 56%
Spetzger, U. 1994Results of early aneurysm surgery in poor-grade patients Neurological Research 76 28% 54%
Seifert, V. 1990
Management morbidity and mortality in grade IV and V patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage Acta Neurochirurgica 74 31% (HH IV) 53% (HH IV)
Bailes JE 1990Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg 34 23% 54%
G. Rordorf 1997
Patients in Poor Neurological Condition after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Early Management and Long-Term Outcome Acta Neurochirurgica 118 30% 47%
Julian E. B 1990Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients Neurosurg 35 23% 65%
John D. Laidlaw 2002
Ultra-early surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcomes for a consecutive series of 391 patients not J Neurosurg 177 45% 40%
Ungersbo Jck et al 1994Aneurysm surgery of patients in poor condition. Indications and experience. Neurol Res 27 22% 11%
Steudel et al 1994Modulated surgery in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm in poor grade patients Neurol Res 57 23% 56%
Bryan J. Duke 1998Outcome after Urgent Surgery for Grade IV Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Surg Neurol 27 33% 59%
EBS presentation 29
Summary of papers
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Evidence Hierarchy
- All articles Level III
(no randomised controlled trials or review)
- No randomized study for poor grade SAH
EBS presentation 30
- Observational retrospective case series
- HH IV and V before and after EVD- All patients except those who showed CT scan evidence of destruction of critical areas had EVD- 97 surgery, 26 endovascular, <24h- Mortality 30% for treatment (100% for no surgery)- Outcome 1y: 47% good outcome after treatment
EBS presentation 31
- Cohort study- HH IV-V- 35 Pt surgery
EBS presentation 32
- Cohort study- All neurological grade included (except brain dead), with 45% (177) WFNS IV and V- Rebleeding higher in the first 24h ultra-early surgery (<24h)- DVE only if acute hydrocephalus on CT- 133 Pt with poor grade went ultra-early surgery- 3-12m follow-up
- good outcome 40%, mortality 45% for poor grade- rebleeding not an argument against early surgery (mean 12%, 20% rebleed for WFNS IV and V), only 11% have poor outcome- no debate between surgery and endovascular ttt
EBS presentation 33
• Early surgery for HH I-III:– 90% good neurological recovery range– Mortality 1.7-8%
EBS presentation 34
• Rebleeding maximal in the first 24 h (4%)
• Second haemorrhage increases mortality to approximately 70%
•
EBS presentation 35
Conclusions
No randomised studies for early vs delayed surgery
sound evidence on the best timing of surgery regarding mortality and morbidity is still lacking
EBS presentation 36
Indirect comparison between different cohorts of patients suggests that early surgery improves outcome ( mortality > morbidity) after aneurysmal SAH in patient with poor clinical conditions at admission compared to delayed surgery.
Each patient must be individually assessedIntracerebral blood clot?Surgical challange in hostile conditions?Endovascular treatment?General medical conditions?Neurological and radiological deep brain lesions?Age?……
EBS presentation 37
Thank you