earthquake risk reduction
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
1/47
2010
ayman
Earthquake efect reduction
2010
Reduction of Eatrhquake
eect
Prepared by:Eng : Ayman Mohamed
Kandeel
Supervisor
PROF.DR : Hamed skarStructural engineering
department
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
2/47
51
contents
before start......................................................................................................(2)
Part one : earth quakeefect.........................................................................(3)
h ! :introduction...............................................................................
.........................( " )h # : $hat cau%e% earth
quake................................................................................... .( ")h 3 : %ei%mic efect% on
%tructure%...............................................................................( & )h " : 'e%ign and 'etailing o e$ Structure% or re%i%t
Earthquake......................(!3)Ch 5: reduction of earth quake effect...................................................................(23)
Part t$o :%ummery .......................................................................................(*+)
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
3/47
51
,eore %tart
From my first trials in my way on my prefer sciene earthquake engineering
I hope it will be helpfull and easy ....
Part one : earth quake efect
chapter (!)introduction
thi% re%earch i% a-out earthquake efect% on -uilding and$hat are the method% that% -y $e can reduce the efectand ri%k o earthquake.
Earthquake engineering i% ane$ %cience that $e mu%tdeal $ith ho$eer the earthquake action i% not ne$ oru% thereore $e hae the need to produce %ome $ay% inour %tructure% help% the %tructure to %u%tain thearthquake efect or longer time.
/hat% $ay the %cience o earthquake reduction appear tothe lie and in the%e ollo$ing page% $e $ill di%cu%%a-out the earthquake efect and our moderntechnologie% in order to reduce earthquake efect%.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
4/47
51
Ayman kandeel##0!+0#+!+
chapter (#)$hat cau%e% earth quake
/he Earth and it% 1nterior
Long time ago, a large collection ofmaterialmasses coalesced to form the Earth. Largeamount ofheat was generated by this fusion, andslowly as theEarth cooled down, the heavier and densermaterialssank to the center and the lighter onesrose to the top.The dierentiated Earth consists of the
Inner Coreradius !"#$%km&, the Outer Corethickness !##%%km&,the Mantle thickness !#$%%km& and theCrustthickness !' to (%km&. )igure " showsthese layers.The *nner +ore is solid and consists of heavy metalse.g., nickel and iron&, while the +rust consists of lightmaterials e.g., basalts and granites&. The uter +ore is liquid in form and the -antlehas the ability to ow.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
5/47
51
!hat "auses Earthqakes#/he irculation%
+onvection currents develop in the viscous-antle, because of prevailing high
temperature andpressure gradients between the +rust andthe +ore,like the convective ow of water whenheated in abeaker )igure #&. The energy for the abovecirculations is derived from the heatproduced fromthe incessant decay of radioactiveelements in therocks throughout the Earth/s interior. Theseconvectioncurrents result in a circulation of theearth/s mass0 hotmolten lava comes out and the cold rockmass goesinto the Earth. The mass absorbedeventually meltsunder high temperature and pressure and becomes apart of the -antle, only to come out again fromanother location, someday. -any such local
circulations are taking place at dierent regionsunderneath the Earth/s surface, leading to dierentportions of the Earth undergoing dierent directionsof movements along the surface.
Plate /ectonic%
The convective ows of -antle material
cause the+rust and some portion of the -antle, toslide on thehot molten outer core. This sliding of Earth/smasstakes place in pieces called Tectonic Plates.The surfaceof the Earth consists of seven ma1ortectonic plates andmany smaller ones )igure 2&. These platesmove in
dierent directions and at dierent speedsfrom those
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
6/47
51
of the neighbouring ones. 3ometimes, the plate in thefront is slower0 then, the plate behind it comes andcollides and mountains are formed&. n the otherhand, sometimes two plates move away from oneanother and rifts are created&. *n another case, twoplates move side4by4side, along the same direction orin opposite directions. These three types of inter4plateinteractions are the convergent, divergent and transformboundaries )igure (&, respectively. The convergentboundary has a peculiarity like at the 5imalayas& thatsometimes neither of the colliding plates wants to sink.The relative movement of these plateboundariesvaries across the Earth0 on an average, it isof the orderof a couple to tens of centimeters per year.
/he Earthquake
Rocks are made of elastic material, and soelasticstrain energy is stored in them during thedeformations that occur due to the gigantictectonicplate actions that occur in the Earth. 6ut, thematerialcontained in rocks is also very brittle. Thus,when therocks along a weak region in the Earth/s +rust reachtheir strength, a sudden movement takes place there)igure '&0 opposite sides of the fault a crack in therocks where movement has taken place& suddenly slipand release the large elastic strain energy stored in theinterface rocks. )or e7ample, the energy releasedduring the #%%" 6hu1 *ndia& earthquake is about (%%times or more& that released by the 194!tom "om#dropped on 5iroshima88The sudden slip at the fault causes t$e
eart$%uake9.a violent shaking of the Earth when largeelastic strainenergy released spreads out through seismicwavesthat travel through the body and along thesurface ofthe Earth. :nd, after the earthquake is over,theprocess of strain build4up at this modi;edinterface
between the rocks starts all over again )igure
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
7/47
51
volume, with its long dimension often running intotens of kilometers.
chapter (3)%ei%mic efect% on %tructure%
!.!. $hat are the %eimic efect on%tructure% 2
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
8/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
9/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
10/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
11/47
51
#.#. ho$ do earth quake afect reinorced
concrete -uilding
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
12/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
13/47
51
chapter (")'e%ign and 'etailing o e$ Structure% orre%i%t Earthquake
$.$. %ntroduction
The design of any new item of infrastructure e.g. structure or lifelines& provides bothan opportunity and a challenge to minimi=e earthquake risk to people and propertywithin the resources available. To minimi=e risk, designers must minimi=e the seismicvulnerability of whatever is being designed. :ny given structure may be sub1ect toone or more of the earthquake induced ha=ards, but this chapter is restricted todesign for the basic phenomenon of ground shaking. E7cept for liquefaction, the otherphenomena are largely matters for site selection, site response regional planning, orfoundation design ,rather than the design of superstructure .the designer will have a design brief, which leads to a preferred structural form andconstruction materials. *n addition, the desired performance of the structure will havebeen agreed, and will range from accepting that implied by a code, or performancerequirements for selected ha=ard levels or limit states .
oncrete Structure%
!.#.!. 1ntroduction
There is more information available about the seismic performance of reinforcedconcrete than any other material. >o doubt this is because of its widespread use, andbecause of the di?culties involved in ensuring its adequate ductility robustness&.
@ell designed and constructed reinforced concrete is suitable for most structures inearthquake areas, but achieving both these prerequisites can be problematical even incountries of advanced technology.Reinforced concrete is generally desirable because of its wide availability andeconomy, and its stiness can be used to advantage to minimi=e seismicdeformations and hence reduce damage to non4structure.Ai?culties arise due to reinforcement congestion when trying to achieve highductilities in framed structures, and the problem of detailing beam4column 1oints towithstand strong cyclic loading remains a di?cult and contentious problem. *t shouldbe recalled that no amount of good detailing will enable an ill4conceived structural
form to survive a strong earthquake.
!.#.#. Sei%mic re%pon%e o reinorced concrete
Reinforcement controls and delays failure in concrete members, the degradationprocess generally being initiated by cracking of the concrete. *nelastic elongation ofreinforcement within a crack prevents the latter from closing when the load directionis reversed and cyclic loading leads to progressive crack widening and steel yielding)igure "%."B&. )enwick "$B2& argued that shear in plastic hinge regions of beams isresistedby truss action until the phase of rapid strength degradation in which large shear
displacements occur.
Fi&ure $ : 3igni;cant stages of development of a plastic hinge in reinforced concrete duringcyclic e7ural and shear loading
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
14/47
51
!.#.3. elia-le %ei%mic -ehaiour o concrete %tructure%
1ntroduction
)or obtaining reliable seismic response behaviour the principles concerning choice ofform, materials, and failure mode control should be applied to concrete structures.Aesigning for failure mode control requires consideration of the structural form used,
with most of the forms being appropriate for concrete, i.e.C
"& -oment4resisting frames.#& 3tructural walls i.e. shear walls&.2& +oncentrically braced frames.(& 5ybrid structures.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
15/47
51
)or concrete structures, , it should be noted that the essential ob1ectives of failuremode control areC
a& 6eams should fail before columns unless e7tra column strength is provided&.
b& 6rittle failure modes should be suppressed.c& :n appropriate degree of ductility should be provided.
So 4o$ to Make ,uilding% 'uctile or 5ood Sei%mic Perormance2
'uctility
>ow, let us make a chain with links made of#rittleand ductile materials )igure 2&. Each of theselinks willfail 1ust like the bars shown in )igure #. >ow,hold thelast link at either end of the chain and apply aforce (.3ince the same force ( is being transferredthrough allthe links, the force in each link is the same, i.e.,
(. :smore and more force is applied, eventually thechainwill break when the )eakest link in it breaks. *ftheductile link is the )eak one i.e., its capacity to take loadis less&, then the chain will show large ;nal elongation.*nstead, if the brittle link is the weak one, then thechain will fail suddenly and show small ;nalelongation. Therefore, if we want to have such a ductilechain, we have to make the ductile link to be the
)eakest link.
)ig "& C ductile chain design.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
16/47
51
Design
Strong column $eak -eam
6uildings should be designed bedesigned like the ductile residentialapartment construction 4 the multi4storeybuilding made of reinforced concrete. *t
consists of hori=ontal and verticalmembers, namely #eams and columns. Theseismic inertia forces generated at its oorlevels are transferred through the various#eams and columns to the ground. Thecorrect building components need to bemade ductile. The failure of a column canaect the stability of the whole building,but the failure of a beam causes locali=edeect.Therefore, it is better to make #eams to bethe ductileweak links than columns. This method of designingR+ buildings is called the strong*column )eak*#eam design method .
Design)ig #& C column slould be stronger than beams .
4o$ architectural eature% afect -uilding
during earthquake2
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
17/47
51
eak-Column
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
18/47
51
chapter (*)method% o reductiono earthquake efect
Introduction
There are many modern methods has been
developed to reduce earthquake effect orrisk and this chapter will illustrate this
methods briefly.
onentional Method%
*ncreasing the cross sectional area,increases the rigidity of the structure, so the probability of structural failure isincreased because of the decrease of the natural period of the structure, i.e. thefrequency of the structure within the range of the frequency content of the
earthquake
e%pon%e control method%
:bsorb and reect the energy introduced by dynamic loads
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
19/47
51
Seimic isolation and response control
Seismic isolation and response control devices have long been sought to control the displacement and
acceleration response of buildings and thus to control the extent of damage caused by earthquake groundmotion and wind excitation . Historically, buildings have been isolated from input earthquake energy by
putting a layer of sand , or steamed rice, between the base of buildings and the soil, as observed in some
historical buildings in China and Japan .
n modern engineering practice, devices for vibration isolation or the dissipation of input energy were first
applied in the field of mechanical engineering, and included applications such as shock absorbers in
automobiles. n structural engineering, flexible rubber blocks have been used to isolate buildings from
vibration induced by underground trains, vehicle traffic and other forms of ground!borne vibration since
their first application in the "#$%s. &ntil recently, however, these techniques have not been used for the
protection of structures from seismic and wind excitations.
'he first modern attempt to isolate a structure from earthquake ground motion was the Heinrich (estalo))i
School in "#*# in Skop+e, acedonia -in the former ugoslavia/ which utili)ed rubber bearings without
internal reinforcing steel plates. 'he first largescale application of seismic isolation was the use of lead!
rubber bearings for the 0illiam Clayton 1uilding in "#2" in 3ew 4ealand, followed by the 5oothill
Communities 6aw and Justice Center in the &S7 in "#2$. 8wing in part to the progress of computer
analysis capabilities to facilitate non!linear dynamic structural analysis, essential to verify the effectiveness
of devices to control response of buildings sub+ected to earthquake and wind excitations, the application of
response control devices has grown significantly over the last two decades for both new construction and the
retrofit of buildings .
'he favourable response of seismically!isolated buildings observed in the "##9 3orthridge earthquake in the
&S7 and the "##$ Hyogoken!3anbu earthquake in Japan has also contributed to the increased acceptance ofthe technology. 'heir performance and measured response verified the validity and reliability of analytical
procedures developed and accelerated the practical application of seismic isolation and response control
systems and lead to the innovation of a wide variety of devices.
These technologies can be categoried as follows:
1! "eismic Isolation
'his technology utili)es flexible elements such as rubber bearings or sliding or rolling mechanisms,
often coupled with energy absorbing dampers, to reduce structural response. 'he basic concept is to givelonger natural periods and provide higher damping to rigid structures to avoid resonance with the
relatively short period components dominant in earthquake ground motions. :ecently, seismic isolation
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
20/47
51
has been utili)ed in more flexible structures to reduce acceleration or displacement response, allowing
designers to minimi)e structural member si)es, or to control damage and improve the post!earthquake
functionality of buildings. Seismic isolation devices demonstrate significant durability and are expected
to function throughout the design life of the structure.
2! #esponse $ontrol "ystems
:esponse control systems can be defined into two categories; direct energy dissipating devices and massdampers.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
21/47
51
Seismically isolated buildings:
Aevices are installed between building and the ground, and they absorbenergy of vibration during the quake. They can reduce vibration of building.6uilding vibration is very slow, there are few possibilities of the foresaidsituations.
Devices for Seismic solation and !esponse
Control
I%T#&'($TI&%
n this following pages we will give an overview of several different response control devices commonly
used in seismic isolation systems and structural control.#esponse control systems are broadly classified into :
"!(assive control
=!Semi!active control
>!7ctive control
9! hybrid control
systems as shown in 'able $.".". 'his classification is based on
S8 >%"% nternational standard ?1asis for design of structures@Seismic action
on structuresA.
$')assi*e control systemsreduce the response of buildings through the use of passive devices which do not require power.
2+"emi+acti*e control systems.
reduce the response of buildings by changing the property of the building structure, i.e., the damping and
stiffness, and requires a relatively small amount of power.
,+-cti*e control systems.reduce the response of buildings by controlling a generated force which resists or reduces the inertia of
buildings.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
22/47
51
+/ybrid control systems.
are composite systems comprising both passive and active systems, where, in general, the active system
assists the passive system.
)assi*e control systems characteried into :
Seismic solation systems.
Bnergy dissipation systems.
7dditional mass effect systems.
"emi+acti*e control systems characteried into :
ariable damping systems
variable stiffness systems
-cti*e control systems characteried into :
mass damper systems .
active tendon systems .
/ybrid control "ystems are :
composite systems comprising both passive and active systems, where, in general, the active system
assists the passive system.
n this Chapter, the construction and performance of popular devices are introduced and discussed. Section
=.= outlines the constructions and performance of isolators for base!isolation system. Section =.> outlines
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
23/47
51
dampers commonly used in both baseisolation systems and passive structural control systems. 7ctive and
Semi!active control systems are often pro+ect specific and therefore are briefly shortly.
"assive control s#stems
2.2. I"&-T
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
24/47
51
2.2.$.2 %undamental D#namic Characteristic
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
25/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
26/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
27/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
28/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
29/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
30/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
31/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
32/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
33/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
34/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
35/47
51
Figure 2.2.1 ! )laces of rubber and sliding bearing on aplan of building
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
36/47
51
*t utili=es the plasticity property of lead. The hysteretic loop contributes toenergy dissipation. There are two types of lead dampers, one has a roundsection and a curved shape as shown in the Dhotograph and other has acylindrical plug in core of the elastomeric isolator.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
37/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
38/47
51
*t utili=es the elasto4plasticity property of steel. The hysteretic loopcontributes to energy dissipation. There are two types of steel dampers, oneis square in section and other is round in section of the rods as shown in theDhotograph.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
39/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
40/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
41/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
42/47
51
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
43/47
51
Other types o(passive contro)
dampers :
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
44/47
51
*'ctive contro) devices
*.$' "+%,E +E-DO-S
'Hyprid "ontro)
7ctuator
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
45/47
51
/'Semi 'ctive Devices
Part three
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
46/47
51
Summery
!e may conc)ode the above pa&es in some 0ords ...........
/here are %ome $ay% tha% -y $e can reduceearthquake efect% .......
Conventional ðods :
*ncreasing the cross sectional area, increases the rigidity of the structure, so theprobability of structural failure is increased because of the decrease of the naturalperiod of the structure, i.e. the frequency of the structure within the range of thefrequency content of the earthquake
!esponse control methods :
!0Actie control
E7ternal source powers apply forces to the structure in a prescribed manner
#0Pa%%ie control
Aoes not require an e7ternal power source
304yprid control
+ombined use of active and passive control systems
"0Semi0actie control
3maller e7ternal energy than in active control systems is required, no mechanicalenergy is added to the structure controllable passive control&
nd 0e sti)) search about another techno)o& methods to improve our 0aysto reduce earthquake efect and risk.
-
7/21/2019 Earthquake Risk Reduction
47/47
erence%
1&art$%uake tips of indian codes .
2 &art$%uake 'isk 'eduction +.. +o)rick
3Response Control and Seismic Isolation of Buildings asahiko
!igashino and Shin "kamoto
4design of Seismic Isolated Structures# $rom Theory to %ractice.. $.
&aeim and '. . (elly
my best wishes
ayman kandeel