e-poster10 patel aimradial20170922 radial pedal sfa cto
Upload: international-chair-on-interventional-cardiology-and-transradial-approach
Post on 21-Jan-2018
91 views
TRANSCRIPT
Transradial versus Transpedal versus Dual
Transradial – Transpedal Access Approach
for Endovascular Intervention of
Superficial Femoral Artery Chronic Total
OcclusionApurva Patel,MD; Wah Wah Htun,MD; Roosha Parikh, MD; Joseph A.
Puma, DO; Robert Bellavics, MD; John T. Coppola, MD; Olivier F. Bertrand,
MD, PhD; Zoltan Ruzsa, MD; Tak W. Kwan, MD
Disclosure Information
Wah Wah Htun and co-authors
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES:
None
UNLABELED/UNAPPROVED USES
DISCLOSURE:
None
Surgical Bypass Endovascular Femoral
40-50% with PAD SFA-CTO
Introduction
Radial Pedal• Improved equipment
and techniques
• Early discharge
• Improved patient
comfort
• Reduce vascular
complications
• No comparison data
Introduction
Study Design-Methods
• Retrospective Study
• Endovascular intervention of SFA CTO for
symptomatic PAD
• Primary radial (TR) or primary pedal (TP)
or dual radial-pedal (TR-TP) approach
(Operator’s discretion)
• Two institutions (New York, USA and
Budapest, Hungary)
• January 2014 to January 2017
• As-treated analysis
Radial vs Pedal vs Dual Radial–Pedal – SFA CTO
• Outcomes
- Crossing success rate
- Procedural success rate
• Primary endpoint
- 30 day major adverse event (death, TVR,
amputation)
• Secondary endpoint
- Access site complication/patency at 30 days
Outcomes
Baseline CharacteristicsTR
(46 patients)
TP
(115 patients)P-value
Age (years) 67.8 ± 10.1 77.0 ± 9.0 0.001
Male, % 60.0 (21) 58.3 (49) 1.00
H/o Hypertension, % 91.4 (32) 88.1 (74) 0.75
H/o Hyperlipidemia, % 85.7 (30) 72.6 (61) 0.16
H/o Tobacco use, % 34.3 (12) 65.5 (55) 0.002
H/o Coronary artery disease, % 51.4 (18) 60.7 (51) 0.41
H/o Cerebrovascular accident, % 5.7 (2) 2.4 (2) 0.58
H/o Diabetes mellitus, % 51.4 (18) 57.1 (48) 0.68
Rutherford classification, % 0.02
III - VI 94 (43) 100 (115)
Results
LesionTR
(47 lesions)
TP
(137 lesions)
Dual TR-TP
(72 lesions)P-value
SFA TASC II classification, % <0.001
Class A 38.0 7.0 12.0
Class B 23.0 18.0 17.0
Class C 17.0 35.0 31.0
Class D 22.0 40.0 40.0
Results
TRA
(38 lesions)
TPA
(74 lesions)
Dual TR-TP
(72 lesions)P-value
Procedural Details
(As treated)
Contrast, mL 114.8 ± 66.8 46.1 ± 9.9 71.3 ± 57.8 <0.01
Fluoroscopy time, sec 715.2 ± 618.2 807.8 ± 516.3 2180.4 ± 1105.0 <0.01
Radiation dose10.2 ± 7.1
(Gy/cm2)
78.0 ± 89.4
(mGy)
271.2 ± 234.8 (mGy)
35.8 ± 15.0 (Gy/cm2)*
Results
TRA TPA Dual TR-TP P-value
Primary endpoint 0.08
MAE – 30 days, % 5.0 (2) 0 2.0 (1)
Death, n 1 0 1
Amputation, % 1 0 0
TVR, % 0 0 0
Secondary endpoint
Access site complications at
30 days, %0 0 0
Access site patency at 30
days, %100 100 100
Results
Transpedal Transradial
Dual
Transradial-Transpedal
Figure: Crossing and Procedural Success
Rates for Transpedal versus Transradial
Approach for Treatment of Superficial
Femoral Artery (SFA) Chronic Total
Occlusion (CTO),
Results
Limitations
• Two centers
- Generalizability
• Learning curve
• SFA-CTO intervention is feasible and safe using TR, TP,
dual TR-TP
- Early ambulation
- Early discharge
- Patient satisfaction/Improved QOL
- Reduction in vascular complications
• First data report
• Motivation for industry New device/equipments
• #RadialFirst for coronaries #RadialPedalFirst for SFA
Conclusion
Thank you#RadialFirst
@kwancardio
@patelapurva