dr. william kritsonis, dissertation chair

55
A MIXED METHODS STUDY OF STUDENT EXPERENCES WITH SCHOOL PRACTICES DEEMED IMPORTANT TO AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT A Dissertation Defense by Steven Norfleet April 9, 2010 William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair Major Subject: Educational Leadership

Upload: guestfa49ec

Post on 18-Nov-2014

2.056 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

A MIXED METHODS STUDY OF STUDENT EXPERENCES WITH SCHOOL PRACTICES DEEMED

IMPORTANT TO AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

A Dissertation Defense by

Steven NorfleetApril 9, 2010

William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Major Subject: Educational Leadership

Page 2: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Dissertation Committee Members

William Allan Kritsonis, Ph.D. (Dissertation Chair)Camille Gibson, Ph.D. Lisa Hobson, Ph.D. (Member) (Member)Ronald Howard, Ph.D. Wanda Johnson, Ph.D. (Member) (Member)

Page 3: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Dissertation Defense Format

1. Background of the Problem2. Purpose of the Study3. Statement of the Problem4. Significance of the Study5. Conceptual Model6. Research Questions7. Literature Review8. Method9. Findings10. Discussion of Null Hypotheses11. Conclusions12. Recommendations

Page 4: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem

Public schools in the United States continue to struggle with the issue of closing the achievement gap between the African American student and their White counterparts.

Educators and researchers alike have attempted to implement solutions to the achievement gap issue. Using primarily top-down approaches, solutions have ranged from improving teacher and administrator qualities, to improving the curriculum, to placing more emphasis on student outcome data, to increasing the rigor in the core subject areas.

Page 5: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem (cont.)

Marzano asserts, “Research in the last 35 years demonstrates that effective schools can have a profound impact on student achievement” (p. 8)

Since the first NAEP report card was issued, African American achievement scores in reading, mathematics, and science among 9, 13, and 17 year olds have averaged some 30 points below their White peers.

Page 6: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem (cont.)

NAEP Mathematics Trend Scores

Page 7: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Trend in White-Black Achievement Gap in Reading 1971-2008

Source: Rampey, B.D., Dion, G.S., & Donahue, P.L. (2009). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 1971-2008

Page 8: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Trend in Black-White Achievement Gap in Mathematics 1971-2008

Source: Rampey, B.D., Dion, G.S., & Donahue, P.L. (2009). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (Various years, 1971-2008

Page 9: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Trend in Grade Twelve Science Achievement Gap by Race/Ethnicity 1996-2005

Source: Grigg, W., Lauko, M., and Brockway, D. (2006). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2005 (NCES 2006-466). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.

Page 10: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Met Standard, Sum of All Grades Tested)

Source: Texas Education Agency, 2009

62%67% 70% 72%

76%80% 82% 84%

45%52% 55% 58%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2005 2006 2007 2008Year

AllWhiteAfrican AmericanPe

rcen

tPa

ssin

g

Page 11: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Texas College Readiness Scores

Texas Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Results

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Year

Mea

n Sc

ore

State 987 992 991 992

White 1047 1059 1059 1056

African American 843 855 860 867

2004 2005 2006 2007

Texas American College Test (ACT) Results

0

5

10

15

20

25

Year

Mea

n Sc

ore

State 20.1 20 20.1 20.2

White 21.8 21.8 22 22

African American 17.1 17 17.1 16.9

2004 2005 2006 2007

Source: Texas Education Agency, 2009

Page 12: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem (cont.)

Alfred Rovai, Louis Gallien Jr. and Helen Stiff-Williams (2007) present the added complexity in Closing the African American Achievement Gap in Higher Education that closing the achievement gap in elementary and secondary schools has now carried over to higher education.

Page 13: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem (cont.)

Gail Thompson (2002) remarked that because of the increase in pressure on school administrators to meet higher federal and state accountability standards including all of the other responsibilities placed on school administrators, California school leaders are asking, “What can we do to improve the academic performance of African American children” (p. xvii)?

Page 14: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem (cont.)

Hans Luyten, Adrie Visscher, and Bob Witziers (2004) have called for studies on the why and how of the school’s perspective in school effectiveness research, and particularly focusing on the classroom and at the campus level. Their research stressed that the ultimate goal of conducting effectiveness research is to identify effective interventions.

Page 15: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Background of the Problem (cont.)

Bob Lingard, Jim Ladwig and Allan Luke (as cited in Luyten et al., 2004) point out “the black box of schooling needs to be opened with more in depth, qualitative analyses of processes that actually occur in schools, which they perceive to have a potential influence on school performance” (pp. 256-257).

Page 16: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of the mixed methods study was to describe African American students’ perceptions of effective leadership practices at their high schools.

Page 17: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Statement of the Problem

The 2001 No Child Left Behind Act is arguably the most sweeping federal education reform effort to force schools to close the achievement gap for minorities since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Although the NCLB legislation has now been in effect for nine years, recent (NationalAssessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), ACT, SAT, and in Texas the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) scores, have not indicated a significant decrease in the academic achievement gap between African American students and their White counterparts.

Page 18: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Statement of the Problem (cont.)

Cooper (2000) states “If reform-minded educators are serious about closing the achievement gap before several decades pass in the new millennium, we must continue to identify alterable factors in the schooling process that help to promote academic success among all students and particularly students of color” (p. 620).

Marzano also states “If a school can simply identify those variables on which it is not performing well, it can pinpoint and receive the information it needs to improve student achievement” (p. 87).

The purpose of the study was to build highly effective leadership practices of school leaders, which are influential in the academic success of students.

Page 19: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Significance of the Study

Understanding that raising student achievement directly leads to growth in the national economy and the provision of a smarter work force, the 2001 NCLB ACT provided additional federal funds to states to improve achievement. With a specific focus on sub-populations, the ACT mandates higher teaching standards, more accountability, and increased student performance.

In the 1960s the U.S. led the world in high school qualifications and Korea was 27th. Now Korea leads the world and the U.S. is 13th and falling. As recently as 1995 the U.S. was second in the world on college-level graduation rates; just a decade later it has slipped to 14th (Sir Michael Barber, p. 1).

Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study or TIMSS indicate that eighth grade United States students are ninth in the world in mathematics and tenth in science out of 47 countries tested in 2007.

Page 20: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Significance of the Study (cont.)

This study sought to improve the practices of the education team. Results of the study may: o generate new strategies and approaches to employ by the education team that could lead to improved academic achievement in all students;o provide quantitative and qualitative data to school leaders

on the influence of an effective high school on the achievement of African American students that are considered at risk as college freshmen;

Page 21: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Significance of the Study (cont.)

o provide college and university teacher education programs with information on schooling leadership practices that resonate with African American learners;

ando for policy makers, results may shed light on funding support

and program interventions that African American students say are needed with future generations of African American students from similar backgrounds as themselves.

Page 22: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Conceptual Framework

o According to the Aspen Institute (2008) Given the stakes of closing the achievement gap, it is imperative to improve the performance of the education team to achieve greater success in schools.

o Chubb and Moe (1990) statedAll things being equal, a student in an effectively

organized school achieves at least a half-year more than a student in an ineffectively organized school over the last two years of high school. If this difference can be extrapolated to the normal four-year high school experience, an effectively organized school may increase the achievement of its students by more than one full year. (p.140)

Page 23: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Conceptual Model (cont.)

Lezotte’s Correlates of Effective Schools

SAFE AND ORDERLYENVIRONMENT

CLIMATE OF HIGH EXPECTATION FOR SUCCESS

CLEAR AND FOCUSED MISSION

POSITIVE HOME/SCHOOL RELATIONS

FREQUENT MONITORING OF STUDENT PROGRESS

OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN, TIME ON TASK

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP StudentImproved Student

Achievement

Page 24: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Research Questions

Quantitative1. How do African American students, enrolled

in a developmental education mathematics course at a selected Black university describe their experiences with each correlate of effective schools?

2. How do the correlates of effective high schools relate to student achievement in a developmental education mathematics course, for freshman and sophomore African American students enrolled at a selected Black university?

Page 25: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Research Questions (cont.)

Qualitative1. How do African American students enrolled in a

developmental education mathematics course at a selected historically Black university report that their former high school campus strove to improve academic achievement for all by:

providing a safe and orderly environment for learning; encouraging high expectations for success for all students; demonstrating effective instructional leadership; implementing a clear and focused mission; maintaining an opportunity to learn and quality time on

tasks for all students; frequently monitoring student progress; and developing and sustaining strong home-school relations?

Page 26: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature

Collyn Bray Swanson (2004) examined safe and orderly environment in a study to determine if there was a difference in the performance of military dependent African American students attending a public school and military dependent African American students attending Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) schools. Results indicated students in the DoDEA system scored slightly higher on the ACT college entrance exam than did the students in the public education system.

Page 27: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature (cont.)

Bamburg and Andrews (1990) conducted an investigation specifically looking at the relationships of a clear and focused mission and the role of the principal as the campus instructional leader to the academic achievement of students. Results indicated that the school goal “To insure academic excellence” showed a significant difference between high achieving and low achieving schools.

Page 28: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature (cont.)

Gentulucci and Muto (2007) conducted a study investigating students’ perceptions of what principals as instructional leaders do to influence their academic achievement.

1. One finding was when principals visited classrooms and interacted with students the effect on achievement was more influential than the instructional leader whose visits were few, short, and passive.

2. Students also indicated that principals that walked around the classroom, checked on their work, and provided gentle advice had more powerful influence on their learning than those sitting in the back of the classroom and observing passively.

Page 29: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature

Boscardin et al. (2005) conducted a study to determine how Opportunity To Learn (OTL) variables impact student outcomes and if the effects were consistent across the subjects of English and algebra assessments. One result of the study was content coverage, which was defined by Boscarin as the amount of time dedicated to the key content areas, was found to be consistently associated with student performance.

Page 30: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature

Zuelke (1982) attempted to customize a model that school districts could use to reallocate human and material resources to enhance reading and mathematics achievement. The study summarized that evidence existed to suggest certain school related variables such as student time-on-task do make a difference in mathematics and reading achievement.

Page 31: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature

Zavadsky (2006) research focused on frequent monitoring of school progress in five urban school districts that were awarded the Broad Prize for the most improved school districts in the United States. One consistent finding of the Broad Prize finalist’s awards was a commitment to share and use data and assessments to inform instructional decisions that affect the student, classes, the school, and the district.

Page 32: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature

Stewart’s (2007) study looked at 546 high schools that included 1,238 African American students. Students were asked on the survey to indicate the degree to which parents engaged in a variety of school activities ranging from parent organization meetings to volunteering. Results infer the importance of the role of educational leaders in improving the relationships between parents and the school to improve achievement of the African American learner.

Page 33: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Review of Literature (cont.)

Scheerens and Bosker (1997) identified eight characteristics of successful schools including a focus on achievement and monitoring of student progress.

Robert Marzano (2003) identified five characteristics of highly successful schools, and stresses challenging goals and effective feedback as major components to achieving high expectations.

Page 34: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

METHODS

o A mixed-methods approach with explanatory design and sequential procedures was employed to address the research problem.

o An advantage of using mixed methods was that the combination of the quantitative and qualitative methods provided a better overall view of the research problem than either method by itself.

o To meet the requirements of the explanatory design and sequential procedures, quantitative data were collected first. This was followed by collection of the qualitative data.

Page 35: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

METHODS (cont.)Null Hypotheses H01 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of a safe and

orderly environment and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

H02 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of high expectations for success and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

H03 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of instructional leadership and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

H04 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of a clear and focused mission and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

H05 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of opportunity to learn and time on task and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

H06 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of frequent monitoring of student progress and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

H07 – There is no statistically significant relationship between the rating of home-school relations and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.

Page 36: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Methods (cont.)Subjects of the Study The target population was 378 African American freshman and sophomore college students enrolled in both the fall 2008 and spring 2009 semesters of a developmental education mathematics course at a historically Black university.Sampleo Quantitative - Ninety-eight (N=98) students were conveniently

selected and gave their consent to participate as a member of the sample group.

o Qualitative - Ninety-eight African American college students agreed to participate in the interview phase of the study. Of this number, 34 were purposely drawn as the sample group to participate in focus group interviews.

Page 37: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Methods (cont.)Demographic Data of Student Participants

Equivalent Percent of African American Student Participants Enrolled in Developmental Education Mathematics by Gender (N=98)______________________________________________________________________Gender N Percent______________________________________________________________________Male 35 35.7Female 63 64.3

Student Participants Enrolled in Developmental Education Mathematics at a Selected Historically Black College and University (HBCU) by Classification (N=98)______________________________________________________________________Classification N Percent______________________________________________________________________Freshman 78 79.6Sophomore 20 20.4

Page 38: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

METHODS (Cont.)

Quantitative Instrumentation Permission was granted by Effective Schools Products Ltd. to

use the database of 2000 questions to create the 42 question-items of the Correlates of Effective Schools Survey.

Seven correlates were divided into three sub-categories per correlate, with six questions that combined to describe the correlate. Twenty-one questions were worded in the positive and 21were worded in the negative.

Demographic Section – participants self-identified their classification as college students, by ethnicity, gender, and high school attended.

Quantitative Instrument Reliability

Page 39: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

METHODS (Cont.)Reliability and Validity of Quantitative Instrument(1) Construct validity was based on Lezotte’s seven Correlates of Effective Schools. (2) Content validity was checked by a panel of experts. 1. Dissertation chair 2. One assistant professor at the current university 3. One assistant professor at a local university(3) Table 5. Cronbach Alpha of Student Participant Responses on Seven Scales of the Correlates of Effective Schools Survey________________________________________________________________________Number of Items Cronbach Alpha Cronbach Alpha Based on

Standardized Items ________________________________________________________________________

7 0.909 0.911

*The results showed that this instrument was reliable.

Page 40: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

METHODS (Cont.)

Qualitative Instrumentation Using the focus group as the unit of

analysis and with semi-prepared questions to conduct interviews, the researcher was the instrument of facilitation in collecting interview data.

Page 41: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

METHODS (Cont.)

Quantitative ProceduresQuantitative data were collected in two phases: (1) administering the Correlates of Effective Schools Survey to students enrolled in a Developmental Education Mathematics course on a date agreed to by the mathematics instructors, and(2) collecting students’ fall 2008 official semester grades in Developmental Education Mathematics.Qualitative ProceduresQualitative data were collected on two interview days:(1)Qualitative data were collected in semi-structured interviews with student participants. There were 34 participants in the interview phases of the study, with two focus groups of ten each and one focus group of 12 participants. Assignment to one of three focus groups was determined by mathematics instructors giving the researcher the permission to conduct student interviews in the classroom and at the regular class time on an agreed upon date. Two students were interviewed individually

Page 42: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings

Research Question #1 Statistical Measurement

How do African American students, enrolled in a development education mathematics course at a selected historically black university describe their experiences witheach correlate of effective schools?

Descriptive statistics measures including central tendencies, frequency distribution, and percentages were used to summarize the results of the survey.

Quantitative Findings and Analysis

Page 43: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of Correlates of Effective Schools Survey Results by Subscale (N=98)__________________________________________________________Correlate Range Min Max Sum M SD__________________________________________________________

Safe and orderly environment (1-6) 15 6 21 1208 12.33 3.089High expectations for success (7-12) 14 6 20 1159 11.83 3.050Instructional leader-ship (13-18) 19 5 24 1226 12.51 3.975Clear and focused mission (19-24) 17 6 23 1179 12.0 3.288Opportunity to learn, time on task (25-30) 15 7 22 1262 12.88 2.923Frequent monitoring of student progress (31-36) 16 6 22 1192 12.16 2.824Home-school relations (37-42) 16 7 23 1406 14.35 2.981

Page 44: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings (cont.)

RESEARCH QUESTION #2

HYPOTHESES INDEPENDENTVARIABLES

DEPENDENTVARIABLE

STATISTICAL TEST

How does thecorrelates of effective high schools relate to student achievement in a development education mathematics course, for freshman and sophomore African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university?

H01 - There is no statistically significant relationship between selected Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) freshman African American student ratings of their former high school’s “effective schools” characteristics, and the student’s first semester of college achievement in Developmental Education Mathematics.

Correlates of Effective Schools

Semester Grade in Development Education Mathematics

(1) Correlation using Pearson r and Multiple Regression Analysis R²

(2) Two-Tailed Test of Significance

Quantitative Findings and Analysis

Page 45: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings (cont.)

Table 2. Sum and Equivalent Percent of Student Participant Survey Responses by Scoring Scale

_______________________________________________________________________________________________Scale Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Agree

______________________________________________(1)______________(2)___________(4)____________(5)_______ Safe and orderly

environment (items 1-6) 121 (20.9%) 238 (41.0%) 126 (21.6%) 97 (16.6%) High expectations for

success (7-12) 172 (29.6%) 271 (46.6%) 104 (17.8%) 35 (6.0%) Instructional leadership

(13-18) 129 (22.2%) 213 (36.6%) 161 (27.7%) 77 (13.2%) Clear and focused

mission (19-24) 148 (25.3%) 308 (52.7%) 97 (16.6%) 32 (5.5%) Opportunity to learn,

time on task (25-30) 115 (19.7%) 301 (51.6%) 123 (21.1%) 44 (7.6%) Frequent monitoring of

student progress (31-36) 141 (24.1%) 306 (52.5%) 109 (18.6%) 28 (4.8%) Home-school relations

(37-42) 95 (16.3%) 229 (39.2%) 180 (30.9%) 79 (13.6%)

Total 921 (22.6%) 1866 (41.9%) 900 (25.2%) 392 (9.6%)

Page 46: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings (cont.)

Table 4. Pearson Correlation and Two-Tailed Test of Significance as a Function of Mathematics Grade (N=98)________________________________________________________________________Correlate Function of Mathematics Grade

Pearson Correlation (r) Significant (Two-Tailed)________________________________________________________________________ Safe and orderly environment

(items 1-6) 0.080 0.431 High expectations for success

(7-12) -0.042 0.684

Instructional leadership (13-18) 0.107 0.294

Clear and focused mission (19-24) 0.058 0.571

Opportunity to learn, time on task

(25-30) -0.076 0.455

Frequent monitoring of student progress (31-36) 0.180 0.076

Home-school relations (37-42) 0.021 0.835

*p < 0.05, two-tailed.

Page 47: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Discussion Null Hypotheses 01-07Null Hypotheses H01-07There was no statistically significant relationship between the rating of A safe and orderly environment; high expectations for student success; instructional leadership; a clear and focused mission; opportunity to learn and time on task; frequent monitoring of student progress; home-school relations;and achievement in a developmental education mathematics course by African American students enrolled at a selected historically Black university.*According to results noted in table 5, null hypotheses 01-07 were not rejected.

Page 48: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings (cont.)

Major Qualitative FindingsTheme 1: Environment Conducive to Learning (15 of 34 or

44%) “In the hallways, control the small things that groups argue

about so that they do not turn into big things.” “My school had a lot of fights…. They pulled the fire alarm

just to get out of school … and there was a high pregnancy rate.”

“Drugs and gangs” “Peer pressure” “Stop students from bringing weapons to school”

Page 49: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings (cont.)

Major Qualitative FindingsTheme 2:Assurance of Effective InstructionalLeadership (20 of 34 or 59%) “It goes back to some teachers want to help students

and some just want to pick up a paycheck”. “We had a lot of substitute teachers”.

Page 50: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Findings (cont.)

Further Analysis of Themes 1 and 2 (90%)o University College fills gaps by offering tutoringo University College fills gaps by connecting with

students often and providing a homey atmosphereo Counselors doors are always open and there are

seminars on lots of thingso UC checks on students on a regular basis

Page 51: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Conclusions

The present study focused on the voice left out in the research on improving African American achievement, the student as a member of the problem solving team.

The quantitative findings indicated that schools were not running effectively at 100 percent using the correlates of effective schools, but were gradually improving.

The qualitative findings revealed that a safe learning environment, strong instructional leadership, and good teachers are what student participants say really concerns them.

What works best in schools for improving student achievement—and in this study, specifically for African American achievement—will be unique to the population the school serves.

Page 52: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Conclusions (cont.)

For school leaders, it is important to continue to believe that schools can make a difference and overcome obstacles to learning and success on the part of students.

It is also important that in moving forward the learner is consulted from time to time on how his or her educators are doing.

In closing, student participants disclosed in interviews that they were thankful for the opportunity to pursue a college degree. They were also thankful that there were programs in place at their current university to help them overcome learning deficiencies.

Page 53: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Recommendations

To address the obstacles to achieving at the highest levels from the perspective of study participants, the following recommendations are presented. Recommendations for Teachers, Counselors, Principals, and Other Educational Leaders: School leaders should maintain an aligned curriculum in which

high school and first year of college curricula in core subjects are fluid.

There should be more direct conversations between high school teachers and college instructors.

African American students in grades 9-14 should receive more guidance and counseling in terms of building self-confidence, solidifying future plans, developing strong time-management skills, and developing strong goal setting skills.

The scores on standardized and state-mandated tests should be discussed with students on a regular basis to help them determine and overcome their specific deficiencies in core subjects.

Page 54: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Recommendations (cont.)

Recommendations for Policy Makers Policy makers should provide information and continue funding

programs on college campuses that help students with known deficiencies to catch up in core subjects.

Policy makers should fund guidance counseling services on a variety of issues for students in grades 9-14.

Page 55: Dr. William Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair

Recommendations (cont.)

Recommendations for Further Study A study could be conducted to explore what additional

means of support are needed to ensure that African American students are successful in mathematics and science in grades 9-12 and beyond.

A study could be conducted with first-year of college mathematics and science instructors to learn more about the challenges they face and the relationship of their pedagogical training to African American student achievement.

A similar study could be conducted with a similar population at other predominantly black institutions of higher learning to understand the achievement gap issue.

A similar study could be conducted with Hispanic and Asian student populations to determine their needs in the transition from high school to college