dr kulkarni

Upload: sapnatulip

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    1/13

    11/5/20

    SNOW AND GLACIERS MONITORING

    ANIL V. KULKARNI

    PROJECT COORDINATORSNOW AND GLACIER PROJECT

    SPACE APPLICATIONS CENTRE

    INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATIONAHMEDABAD-380015, INDIA

    GEOMORPHOLOGY OF HIMALAYAN GLACIERS:

    SAMUDRA TAPU GLACIER, H.P., INDIA

    Tributaryglacier

    Ablation area

    Accumulationarea

    Moraine

    Moraine-dammedlake

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    2/13

    11/5/20

    IRS LISS IV26 Aug. 2008

    Zanskar basin

    (J & K)

    lake

    Ablationarea

    Accumulationarea

    Lateralmoraine

    Snow line

    Glacier boundary

    Tributaryglacier

    Snout

    GLACIER FEATURES

    SAMUDRA TAPU GLACIER, HIMACHALPRADESH IRS LISS IV IMAGERY

    SEPTEMBER 16, 2006

    Year Area of Glacier(sq. km.)

    Cumulative Loss inArea (ha)

    Annual loss inarea (ha/y)

    1976 72.41 --- ----1989 72.17 24 1.82000 71.93 48 2.12006 71.83 58 1.6

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    3/13

    11/5/20

    RETREAT OF GLACIERS IN INDIAN HIMALAYA

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Retreat (m/y)

    Parbati

    Sara Umaga

    Gangotri

    Dokriani Bamak

    Hamta

    Samudra Tapu

    Pindari

    RETREAT OF PARBATI GLACIER

    Dead ice zone

    LISS-III and PAN1998

    4000

    4200

    4400

    4600

    4800

    5000

    5200

    5400

    5600

    5800

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Cumulative percent area

    Altitude(m)Dead ice zone

    LISS-IV: 2004

    4000

    4200

    4400

    4600

    4800

    5000

    5200

    5400

    5600

    5800

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Cumulative percent area

    Altitude(m)

    AREA ALTITUDE DISTRIBUTION

    Year Area

    (sq. km)

    Loss in area

    (sq. km)

    Cumulative

    loss inlength (m)

    Rate

    m/yr.

    1990 40.14 ----- ----

    1998 38.21 1.93 459 57

    2000 37.73 0.48 22 11

    2001 36.87 0.84 97 97

    2004 130 43

    2006 76 38

    Loss 1990-2006 784 49

    Snow line altitude at the end of ablation seasonSnow line altitude at the end of ablation season

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    4/13

    11/5/20

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    Chan

    dra

    Bhaga

    Warwa

    nBh

    utMiyar

    Parbati

    Baspa

    Alakna

    nda

    Bhagarath

    i

    Gauriga

    nga

    Tista

    ANNUAL LOSS OF GLACIER AREA IN INDIAN HIMALAYA1962 - 2001/4

    116

    111

    253

    189

    166

    9019

    126187

    6057

    Mean rate of area loss 0.39 % per year

    MOUNTAIN GLACIER RETREAT IN DIFFERENTREGIONS OF THE WORLD

    From: Racoviteanu et al. 2008

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    5/13

    11/5/20

    FRAGMENTATION OF GLACIER: CHENAB BASIN

    FRAGMENTATION OF GLACIERS

    CHENAB BASIN(Kulkarni et al 2007)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    0 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.2 0.32 0.86 1.4 3.5 5.6 14.3 23 57 91 360area (km^2)

    No.ofGlaciers

    1962

    2001

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    6/13

    11/5/20

    CAUSES OF FRAGMENTATION

    Ice melt near Gomukh, Gangotri glacier.Less melt near Gomukh. (Source: Maruthi

    et.al., 2003)

    3900

    4000

    4100

    4200

    4300

    -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

    Melt in cm

    Height

    Glacier mass balance for 228 glaciersdistributed through out the globe,Cumulative mean ice loss is 20 mw.e. out of 100 m. Disintegratingmany glaciers (Zemp et al., 2009)

    Fragmentation will have profound impact on glacial retreat. It effectively reduces depth,

    response time and accelerates retreat.

    1962

    2004

    52H12003

    52H12004Glacial ice

    GLACIERS IN PARBATI BASIN

    EFFECT OF FRAGMENTATION ON RETREAT: CHENAB

    Fragmentation will have

    profound impact on glacialretreat. It effectively reduces

    depth, response time andaccelerates retreat.

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    10

    Glacier area (sq km)

    Arealossfrom

    1962-2001(%

    )

    Influence of glacier size on retrea t

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

    Glacier Area (sq km)

    Lossinareain%Perye

    ar

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    7/13

    11/5/20

    Chandra

    Sept. 6, 5

    Sept. 6, 5

    MEAN SP. MASS BALANCE: 19 GLACIRS BASPA BASIN

    2001: - 40 cm 2002: -78 cm 2004: -57 cm

    Loss of glacial ice: 0.11735 cu km/year

    -140

    -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

    Accumulation area ratio

    Massbalance(cm)

    R = 0.89

    GLACIERS ZERO AAR: BHAGA: 18 CHANDRA: 4

    BASPA 4

    DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL TO ESTIMATE

    MASS BALANCE: BASPA BASIN(KULKARNI 1992, 2004)

    CHANGES IN MASS BALANCE IN HIMALAYA

    BASPA: Snowline shift 4900- 5200 m between 1976 TO 2006 AAR FROM 0.7 TO 0.3.

    In the Himalaya no systematic record is available. Maximum alt. of snow line is

    shifted from 4800 m to 5200 m from mid 1980 to 2008. This is significantly affectingmass balance

    Snow line altitude at the end of summer onChhotha Shigri glacier

    4700

    4800

    4900

    5000

    5100

    5200

    5300

    5400

    1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

    Year of observation

    snowlinealtitudem

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    5000

    5500

    6000

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Warwan: 340 glaciers

    1975-90

    2000-06

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    5000

    5500

    6000

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Warwan: 340 glaciers

    1975-90

    2000-06

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    8/13

    11/5/20

    From: Shekhar et. al., 2009

    CHANGES IN TEMPERATURE AND PRECEPITATION IN

    WESTERN HIMALAYA

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    1988-891991-921994-951997-982000-012003-042006-07

    Year

    Precipitation(cm)

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    MODELING GLACIAL CHANGESPARBATI GLACIER

    OBSERVATIONS

    Arial extent of glacier in 2001 23.7 km2

    Accumulation area in 2001 3.56 km2

    Accumulation Area Ratio in 2001 0.138

    Estimated glacial mass balance 2001 -86 cm

    Estimated depth of glacier in 2001 126 m

    Measured rate of melting at snout -6 m/year

    Measured glacier length in 2001 10120 m

    PREDICTIONS

    Estimated response time from 2001 21 years

    Estimated loss in glacial length from 2001 to 2022 1461 m (69 m/y)

    VALIDATION

    Measured loss in glacial length from 2001 to 2006 206 m (41 m/y)

    Kulkarni et al., Current Science 88(11), 2005

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    9/13

    11/5/20

    SNOW STUDIES

    SNOW COVER MONITORING USING NDSI METHOD

    DISCRIMINATION of SNOW and CLOUDs, SNOW UNDER MOUNTAIN SHADOW

    FCCFCC NDSI

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    10/13

    11/5/20

    Snow accumulation and ablation pattern in basinslocated in different parts of Himalaya

    Ravi basin (10 Daily)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    1-Oct 1-Dec 1-Feb 1-Apr 1-Jun

    Date

    %

    ArealextentofSnow

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

    Bhaga basin (10 Daily)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    1-Oct 1-Dec 1-Feb 1-Apr 1-Jun

    Date

    %ArealextentofSnow

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    1-Oct 1-Dec 1-Feb 1-Apr 1-Jun

    Date

    %Arealextentofsnow

    year 04-05 year05-06 year 06-07

    Alaknanda basin (10 Daily)

    TISTA BASIN (COMPOSITE) 2004-2008

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    O N D J F M A M J

    MONTHS

    %AREALEXTENTOFSNO

    2004-2005 2005- 2006 2006 -2007 2007- 2008

    OCT DEC FEB APR JUN

    Mean snow fall Western Himalaya: 2004-5: 739 cm; 2005-6: 606 cm; 2006-7: 596 cm

    SNOW DEPLETION CURVE:BEAS BASIN

    ALTITUDE 3000-3600 m

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 85 88 90 92

    Year of observations

    Discharge(cume

    cs)

    5-yr running average December

    INCREASE IN STREAM

    RUNOFF OF BASPABASIN FOR

    DECEMBER BETWEEN1966 TO 1993 IS FROM

    8 TO 14 CUMECS

    (Kulkarni et. al. 2002 and

    2003)

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    11/13

    11/5/20

    DEVELOPMENT OF SNOW AND GLACIER MELT RUNOFF

    MODEL FOR MICRO AND MINI RIVER BASINS

    (Kulkarni et. al. 2002)

    SEASONAL SNOW AND GLACIER MELT RUNOFF MODELING

    (Pre-feasibility investigation, Autumn, winter, summer, Monsoon )Q=c{a(T*G)}+c{S*W)-(M*Sw)} + (c*P*B)Where,

    Q = Average seasonal runoff (cu m/s)

    C = Runoff coefficient

    a = Melt factor (cm/degree C.d)

    T = Average seasonal degree-day (degree.day)

    G = Area of snow and glaciers (sq km)

    S = Area of seasonal snow (sq km)

    W = Water equivalent of winter snow fall (m)

    M = Winter snow melt (m)

    Sw= Snow cover in winter

    P = Average seasonal rainfall (m)

    B = Basin area without snow/glacier (sq m)

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    12/13

    11/5/20

    Validation of snow and glacier melt runoff model: Wangar Gad basin(Rathore and Kulkarni, 2009)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Autumn Winter Monsoon Summer

    Error(%) 3.4 %

    4.7 %

    4.1 %

    4.9 %

    Estimated seasonal runoff (cumecs) in Wangar Gad basin

    due to rise in temperature by 1oC(Rathore and Kulkarni, 2009)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    1 2 3 4

    Season

    Runoff(Cumec)

    Autumn Winter Summer Monsoon

    -20 %

    -18 %

    -8 %-28 %

  • 8/3/2019 Dr Kulkarni

    13/13

    11/5/20

    SALIENT OBSERVATIONS

    Retreat of 1317 glaciers 11 basins suggest 16 % loss in area from 1962.

    Mean of glacial extent reduced from 1.4 to 0.32 sq km. Number of glaciersincreased due to fragmentation but extent is reduced.

    Snow line at the end of summer changed from 4900 m to 5300 m from1970. Many glaciers are without accumulation area and may experienceterminal retreat due to lack of formation of new ice.

    Large scale melting and retreat of seasonal snow was observed in basinslike Ravi throughout the winter. In high altitude basins like Baspa andBhaga, large scale retreat was observed in beginning of winter. Snowdepletion curve in Beas basin suggest early and rapid melting of snowcover.

    Average stream runoff of Baspa river in December was increased by 75per cent from 1970.

    THANKS

    TERMINUS OF PARBATI GLACIER