dpe property project presentation to the parliamentary portfolio committee on public enterprises 21...

37
DPE Property Project Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises 21 June 2006

Upload: bryce-nicholson

Post on 27-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DPE Property Project

Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Public

Enterprises21 June 2006

Overview of Presentation

• Background• Process• Non-core Property breakdown by SOE• Geographical spread of SOE non-core properties• Properties for Sale: B-BBEE Guidelines

– Promoting B-BBEE– Promoting Local Benefit

• Properties for Development– Property Development Process– Property Development Vehicle

Background• DPE sole shareholder for 7 SOE.• SOE are in a process of focusing on core business, divesting

themselves of assets and enterprises that are non-core. • Property project identifies optimal ways to dispose of non-core

property. • Non-core property holdings have been classified as either commercial

or non-commercial properties. • Properties for development can optimise value for SOE and promote

socio-economic development impact.

Property PortfolioProperty Portfolio

CoreCore

Non-coreNon-core

Disposal to GovernmentDisposal to Government

Housing Housing

SaleSale

Non-Commercial

Non-Commercial

CommercialCommercial

DevelopmentDevelopment

Process• Cabinet Memo on the framework for the disposal of non-

core property has been approved.• Submission of Cab Memo on B-BBEE guidelines for

consideration.• PFMA

– Approval granted for Transnet’s non-core list.– Partial PFMA approval granted to Denel.– Transactions will be subject to approval by the Minister

in terms of S54(2).• Properties for Sale

– Competitive process with a set of clearly defined steps in the transaction process.

– B-BBEE Guidelines apply.– Local benefits.

Process

• Disposal to government and consultation with government departments:– Bilateral with Department of Housing is underway.– Bilateral with Department of Education is imminent.– Discussions with Land Affairs have started.

• Once disposals to government departments have been finalised, SOE packaging will proceed followed by disposal to the public.

• Provincial roadshows and communication strategy to raise awareness of the disposals process to alert people to potential purchasing opportunities at a local level.

• Properties for development to be developed under auspices of SPV.

Non-Core Property Share by SOE

Denel20%

Eskom13%

SAA0%

Transnet67%

Transnet

Denel

Eskom

SAA

Spread of SOE Non-Core PropertiesLegend

Number of Non-Core Properties per Location

1 - 2

3 - 6

7 - 10

11 - 15

16 - 23

SA railway

SA Provinces

Eastern Cape

Free State

Gauteng

KwaZulu-Natal

Lesotho

Mpumalanga

North West

Northern Cape

Northern Province

Western Cape

30 March 2006

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Bloemfontein

Touwsrivier

De Doorns

Kimberley

Breyton

Upington

De Aar

Vryheid

PECoega

Durban

Pretoria

Saldanha

Cape Town

Mossel Bay

East London

Beit Bridge

Richards Bay

Johannesburg

Properties for Sale: B-BBEE Guidelines

• Originally, collaborated with DPW on a Joint Disposal Strategy and B-BBEE Guidelines, but resubmission of latest Cab Memo focuses on B-BBEE Guidelines which are applicable to SOE only.

• B-BBEE guidelines are based on the dti Codes of Good Practice and the Property Sector Charter.

• Applicable to properties for sale.• Replicability of these guidelines for properties for

development yet to be determined.

Promoting B-BBEE through Disposals

BEE Status Qualification Recognition Level

Level One Contributor ≥100 points on the Generic Scorecard 135%

Level Two Contributor ≥85 but <100 points on the Generic Scorecard

125%

Level Three Contributor ≥75 but <85 on the Generic Scorecard 110%

Level Four Contributor ≥65 but <75 on the Generic Scorecard 100%

Level Five Contributor ≥55 but <65 on the Generic Scorecard 80%

Level Six Contributor ≥45 but <55 on the Generic Scorecard 60%

Level Seven Contributor ≥40 but <45 on the Generic Scorecard 50%

Level Eight Contributor ≥30 but <40 on the Generic Scorecard 10%

Non-Compliant Contributor <30 on the Generic Scorecard 0%

Where any enterprise is in excess of 50% owned by black people and has achieved the full 7 points under net equity interest, the BEE Status of that Enterprise will be at the level immediately above the level at which its actual score is evaluated.

Promoting B-BBEE

• Overall target:– A minimum of 70% of all asset disposals by value (other than those

for transfer or housing) by each SOE must be to entities with a BBBEE status of at least Level 4, i.e. entities with scorecard points equal to and above 65%.

• BEE thresholds have been set for different property values.• DPE considers that local benefit and economic

development are functional criteria against which bids should be measured - these have been built into the adjudication criteria.

• Each SOE should report quarterly to the DPE on performance against the targets, based on the BBBEE status table.

Properties for Development

• JOHANNESBURG: Newtown North PrecinctSpatial development framework and business case complete, possible JV

• JOHANNESBURG: International AirportProperty strategy complete, land transactions with ACSA in process

• JOHANNESBURG: Kaserne / City-Deep Inland PortScoping study completed

• DURBAN: Non-port related sitesVictoria Embankment and NMR development projects underway

• EAST LONDON CBDDevelopment framework completed, land transfer to District council and Buffalo City Development Agency under consideration

• PORT ELIZABETH: HarbourBusiness case for relocation and harbour development completed, Transnet capital projects reviewing decision by end July 06.

• CAPE TOWN: Culemborg Black-RiverProperties for development identified, negotiations on development framework and bulk infrastructure underway.

Provision of infrastructure services

Construction of improvements

Property Development Process

PROFESSIONFEESPROJECTMANAGELANDENABLECOSTS

Property in current transport usezoning, improvements & infrastructure to support historic use

DEVELOPED PROPERTY TO END USERDEVELOPED PROPERTY TO END USER

Acquisition of alternative land use rights development rights to support mixed alternative land use

Marketresearch

Viabilitystudy

ContextPrecinctPlan

TownPlanning

Developframework

RezoneSurvey

PROPERTYHOLDINGCOSTMANAGEFEE

ELECTRICSEWERAGEWATERROADSSTORMTELECOM

BRICKSMORTORCONSTRUCTION

MARKETINGSALESLEASINGADVERTISING

Newtown North Precinct

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

ACSA

JOHANNESBURG AIRPORT LAND HOLDINGS

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

JOHANNESBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

JOHANNESBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Johannesburg

Kaserne / City Deep

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

2608 Container Data.doc

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

TEUs at City Deep

0200000400000600000800000

10000001200000140000016000001800000

Year

TE

U

Low

Middle

High

CSIR for City of Johannesburg Economic Development Unit, June 2004

Container throughput to double in 10 years

Container Growth Demand

Land required at City Deep (ha)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

2015

2018

Year

ha

Low

Middle

High

CSIR for City of Johannesburg Economic Development Unit, June 2004

Projected Demand for Land

DURBAN

GAUTENG PRETCON

SENTRARAND

CITY DEEP

DURBAN PORT

BAYHEAD

KZN Inland Terminal – e.g. Cato Ridge

ERMELO

WITBANK

KOMATIPOORTMAPUTO

RICHARDS BAY

Coal-link export line, dual electrified 25KVA AC, also carries general freight

Electrified 3KV DC

Electrified 3 KV DC

Non- Electrified

Non Electrified

Durban Gauteng Spoornet mainline service

Dual Electrified 3 KV DC

Current - Approx 25 to 30 trains per day in each direction. 5 to 7 Container trains per day in each direction.Operating at less than 40% of theoretical capacity

IMEX Intermodal service, 1100 wagons, 247 000 teu’s pa = average 6,4 day wagon turnaround, 5 to 8 day container transit time

Proposed- long trains to Sentra rand then short block train diesel loco shuttle to Kaserne and city deep – direct to terminals

Durban Gauteng Road Freight Service

Congestion, road safety and environmental issues

Door to door transit time 2 days

Proposal: Sentra Rand Marshalling yard, Future Inter-modal Terminal

Proposal: Diesel shuttle rail service, Sentra Rand - City Deep

Proposed -Block train Spoornet service to inland port, shuttle diesel rail service to Durban Port. Decreased Spoornet wagon turnaround, decreased costs

Future Road freight terminal

Proposal: City Deep Inter-modal upgrade and re-planning.

Schematic of Corridor

KC-D Action Plan

• Improve operational efficiencies by 2014 - reduce wagon turnaround time from 6 to 2 days.

• Design rail operating system and layout of KC-D block train marshalling and dispatch yard to service container terminals and warehousing facilities.

• Identify container terminals for possible concession, development and service provision.

• Undertake internal high level layout design and establish potential viability and industrial land value.

• Identify town planning, infrastructure and service requirement to maximise land values and operational efficiencies.

• Programme phasing of rail service improvement, system upgrading, marketing and development.

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Durban

• Joint NPA-eThekwini call for proposals on Victoria Embankment.

• Project preparation and excision of NMR site from Spoornet as part of City Sports Precinct for 2010.

East London CBD

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

East London CBD

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Port of Port Elizabeth

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Port Elizabeth: Manganese Ore & Fuel Reservoir

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Port Elizabeth

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Port Elizabeth Development Site

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Transport Corridor approaching Cape Town

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

CAPE TOWNCAPE TOWN

Transnet propertyTransnet property

Transport Corridor approaching Cape Town

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Transport Corridor leaving Cape Town

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Culemborg Development Proposal

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Transport Infrastructure Requirements

PMG note: map not included, please email [email protected]

Property Development Vehicle

• The coordinated development of the key property projects needs overall coordination under a single property development vehicle.

• A model has been designed and is under consideration.

• Key functions to be performed:– Asset management– Development management– Property management– Compliance management

Property Development Vehicle

Guiding principles that have informed the proposed institutional arrangements:

• Decision making must be fair, transparent and certain

• The proposed institutional arrangements must:– Set out defined reporting lines and governance

structure.– Be commercially viable and sustainable.– Ensure public sector oversight, participation and

representation.– Avoid duplication of capacity by utilising existing public

sector SOE capacities.– Contribute to transformation of the property sector.